Cosmopolitanism: How the UK Government and News Media Structure the Order of Security Discourse to Impede Challenges on Torture and Abuse
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
University of Huddersfield Repository
University of Huddersfield Repository Verguson, Christine Jane ‘Opting out’? nation, region and locality Original Citation Verguson, Christine Jane (2014) ‘Opting out’? nation, region and locality. Doctoral thesis, University of Huddersfield. This version is available at http://eprints.hud.ac.uk/23523/ The University Repository is a digital collection of the research output of the University, available on Open Access. Copyright and Moral Rights for the items on this site are retained by the individual author and/or other copyright owners. Users may access full items free of charge; copies of full text items generally can be reproduced, displayed or performed and given to third parties in any format or medium for personal research or study, educational or not-for-profit purposes without prior permission or charge, provided: • The authors, title and full bibliographic details is credited in any copy; • A hyperlink and/or URL is included for the original metadata page; and • The content is not changed in any way. For more information, including our policy and submission procedure, please contact the Repository Team at: [email protected]. http://eprints.hud.ac.uk/ ‘OPTING OUT’? NATION, REGION AND LOCALITY The BBC in Yorkshire 1945-1990 CHRISTINE JANE VERGUSON A thesis submitted to the University of Huddersfield in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy The University of Huddersfield January 2014 Copyright statement i. The author of this thesis (including any appendices and/or schedules to this thesis) owns any copyright in it (the “Copyright”) and s/he has given The University of Huddersfield the right to use such copyright for any administrative, promotional, educational and/or teaching purposes. -
Boycotts and Sanctions Against South Africa: an International History, 1946-1970
Boycotts and Sanctions against South Africa: An International History, 1946-1970 Simon Stevens Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of Arts and Sciences COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY 2016 © 2016 Simon Stevens All rights reserved ABSTRACT Boycotts and Sanctions against South Africa: An International History, 1946-1970 Simon Stevens This dissertation analyzes the role of various kinds of boycotts and sanctions in the strategies and tactics of those active in the struggle against apartheid in South Africa. What was unprecedented about the efforts of members of the global anti-apartheid movement was that they experimented with so many ways of severing so many forms of interaction with South Africa, and that boycotts ultimately came to be seen as such a central element of their struggle. But it was not inevitable that international boycotts would become indelibly associated with the struggle against apartheid. Calling for boycotts and sanctions was a political choice. In the years before 1959, most leading opponents of apartheid both inside and outside South Africa showed little interest in the idea of international boycotts of South Africa. This dissertation identifies the conjuncture of circumstances that caused this to change, and explains the subsequent shifts in the kinds of boycotts that opponents of apartheid prioritized. It shows that the various advocates of boycotts and sanctions expected them to contribute to ending apartheid by a range of different mechanisms, from bringing about an evolutionary change in white attitudes through promoting the desegregation of sport, to weakening the state’s ability to resist the efforts of the liberation movements to seize power through guerrilla warfare. -
Part III Eurosceptic Civil Society
Part III Eurosceptic Civil Society 8 Performing Euroscepticism: The UK Press and Cameron’s Bloomberg Speech Oliver Daddow Introduction UK newspapers have exerted manifest structuring effects over Britain’s national debates about ‘Europe’. First, the UK newspaper market is dominated by various forms of Eurosceptical sentiment and since the Eurozone crisis in particular has expounded a form of ‘hard Euroscepticism’ (Taggart and Szczerbiak 2004) which extolls the merits of EU withdrawal. Second, Eurosceptical journalists have popularized a Eurosceptic discourse through which European integration is constructed both as ‘over there’ and as an implied or explicit threat to British sovereignty interests and national identity (Anderson and Weymouth 1998; Hawkins 2012). Chris Gifford has usefully described this ‘populist politics’ of Euroscepticism in his account of the ideological manifestations of Euroscepticism in the UK (Gifford 2014, p.6). It draws on an obsession with past conflicts and the Second World War especially, which have provided British Eurosceptics with a range of linguistic weapons to keep their audiences in a ‘permanent state of discursive war’ (Daddow 2011, pp.109–34) with a malign ‘other’ across the English Channel (Gifford 2006). Third, with elite Europhile opinion seeping away in elite political discourse and policy the UK press has been a significant factor in agenda-setting on European issues policy through the ‘climate of fear’ it has generated against the public espousal of pro-European narratives (Daddow 2012). Comparatively speaking, Britain is home to an ‘unusually Eurosceptical media market’ especially on the press side: this goes for the volume of Eurosceptical coverage and the bombastic, nationalistic and sometimes xenophobic tone of that coverage (Ford et al. -
Bibliography
BIBLIOGRAPHY This biography aims to list the major sources of information about the history of the British Liberal, Social Democrat and Liberal Democrat parties. It concentrates on published books. Some references are made to archival sources for major figures but a guide to archive sources can be found elsewhere on the website and the books listed will guide towards collections of articles. It is organised in four sections: § The philosophic and policy background § The history of the party and Liberal governments § Elections § Biographies and autobiographies of leading party members The list does not attempt to be comprehensive but most of the major works included in this list will contain references to other relevant works. Those new to the subject are referred to our shorter reading list for an introduction to the subject. Unless otherwise indicated, the place of publication is usually London. THE PHILOSOPHIC AND POLICY BACKGROUND GENERAL R Bellamy, Liberalism and Modern Society: An Historic Argument, (Cambridge University Press, 1992) Duncan Brack and Tony Little (eds) Great Liberal Speeches (Politico’s Publishing, 2001) Duncan Brack & Robert Ingham (eds) Dictionary of Liberal Quotations (Politico’s Publishing, 1999) Alan Bullock (ed), The Liberal Tradition from Fox to Keynes, (Oxford University Press, 1967). Robert Eccleshall (ed) British Liberalism: Liberal thought from the 1640s to 1980s (Longman, 1986) S Maccoby (ed), The English Radical Tradition 1763-1914, (1952) Conrad Russell An Intelligent Person’s Guide to Liberalism (Duckworth, -
Housing Cultural Studies – a Memoir, with Buildings, of Stuart Hall, Richard Hoggart and Terence Hawkes John Hartley
Housing Cultural Studies – A memoir, with buildings, of Stuart Hall, Richard Hoggart and Terence Hawkes John Hartley Curtin University, Australia and Cardiff University, Wales Abstract Three globally significant figures in cultural studies died in 2014. They were Terence Hawkes (13 May 1932-16 January 2014), Stuart Hall (3 February 1932-10 February 2014), and Richard Hoggart (24 September 1918-10 April 2014). I miss them all. That personal feeling motivates what follows. But there’s a public aspect to it too. Not only did I watch and admire these three people building cultural studies; I know the buildings they built it in. Suddenly those buildings feel empty, not facing the future but confined to their times, ceasing to ‘speak’ as they silently await sufficient neglect and dilapidation to justify the new-generation wrecking ball of ‘creative destruction’ to open up the space for something new that has already forgotten them. Keywords: Terence Hawkes, Stuart Hall, Richard Hoggart. ‘Et credis cineres curare sepultos?’ ‘And do you think that the ashes of the dead concern themselves with our affairs?’ (Virgil, in Stone 2013: 174) I am motivated to write about Hall, Hoggart and Hawkes because academic society, the ‘critical’ humanities, and cultural studies in particular, are careless of their elders and ancestors. They – we – are inclined too often to accept a rote-learned genesis (‘… and Hoggart begat Hall…’), which does no honour to those named, never mind the many whose names are quietly erased by this all too ‘selective tradition’ (Williams 1977).1 So another part of my motivation is that I think the memorialisation process always gets things wrong. -
Soundbites : Four Episodes of the Bbc Radio 4 Comedy Panel Game Pdf, Epub, Ebook
NEWS QUIZ: SOUNDBITES : FOUR EPISODES OF THE BBC RADIO 4 COMEDY PANEL GAME PDF, EPUB, EBOOK BBC Radio Comedy | 1 pages | 13 Nov 2014 | BBC Audio, A Division Of Random House | 9781910281635 | English | London, United Kingdom News Quiz: Soundbites : Four episodes of the BBC Radio 4 comedy panel game PDF Book Graphic Novels. In , researchers found that listeners were two and a half times more likely to hear a pro-EU speaker on Radio 4 than an anti-EU one. Jojo Moyes. Meik Wiking. Topical panel show taking a satirical look at the week's news. Lila Bowen. From yoga in the garage to getting creative from home, how the UK is adapting to All Genres. Other Series. Nora Roberts. Books Video icon An illustration of two cells of a film strip. Featured Contributors. Julie Garwood. QI Panel game that contains lots of difficult questions and a large amount of quite interesting facts. From A panel of celebrity guests join Victoria Coren Mitchell to use their wit and wisdom to argue against narrow-minded thinking and received opinions of the day. Sandi Toksvig and the panellists wade through a week's news stories. Sophie Jackson. Foreign Language Titles. Margaret Robertson Colonel Jacques Jack Cheng. Gary Watson Josella Playton Audio Software icon An illustration of a 3. Wordaholics Radio 4 panel game that tests the guests linguistic knowledge. Dan Brown. Arthur Conan Doyle. Simon Mayo hosts this Radio 4 panel show that pits three comic generations against each other. Extremely popular radio comedy. Business Development. Helen Fielding. The Guardian. Don't Make Me Laugh Radio 4 series created by David Baddiel in which guests must try to avoid making the audience laugh. -
Political Handbags. the Representation of Women Politicians
MEDIA@LSE Electronic MSc Dissertation Series Compiled by Professor Robin Mansell and Dr. Bart Cammaerts Political handbags. The representation of women politicians. A case study of the websites and newspaper coverage of the women candidates in the Labour Party Deputy Leadership election. Helena Markstedt, MSc in Politics and Communication Other disssertations of the series are available online here: http://www.lse.ac.uk/collections/media@lse/mediaWorkingPapers/ Dissertation submitted to the Department of Media and Communications, London School of Economics and Political Science, September 2007, in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the MSc in Politics and Communication. Supervised by Dr. Maggie Scammell. Published by Media@lse, London School of Economics and Political Science ("LSE"), Houghton Street, London WC2A 2AE. The LSE is a School of the University of London. It is a Charity and is incorporated in England as a company limited by guarantee under the Companies Act (Reg number 70527). Copyright in editorial matter, LSE © 2007 Copyright, Helena Markstedt © 2007. The authors have asserted their moral rights. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means without the prior permission in writing of the publisher nor be issued to the public or circulated in any form of binding or cover other than that in which it is published. In the interests of providing a free flow of debate, views expressed in this dissertation are not necessarily those of the compilers or the LSE. MSc Dissertation Helena Markstedt Political handbags. The representation of women politicians. -
The Conservatives in Crisis
garnett&l 8/8/03 12:14 PM Page 1 The Conservatives in crisis provides a timely and important analysis incrisis Conservatives The of the Conservative Party’s spell in Opposition following the 1997 general election. It includes chapters by leading academic experts The on the party and commentaries by three senior Conservative politicians: Lord Parkinson, Andrew Lansley MP and Ian Taylor MP. Having been the dominant force in British politics in the twentieth century, the Conservative Party suffered its heaviest general Conservatives election defeats in 1997 and 2001. This book explores the party’s current crisis and assesses the Conservatives’ failure to mount a political recovery under the leadership of William Hague. The Conservatives in crisis includes a detailed examination of the reform of the Conservative Party organisation, changes in ideology in crisis and policy, the party’s electoral fortunes, and Hague’s record as party leader. It also offers an innovative historical perspective on previous Conservative recoveries and a comparison with the revival of the US Republican Party. In the conclusions, the editors assess edited by Mark Garnett and Philip Lynch the failures of the Hague period and examine the party’s performance under Iain Duncan Smith. The Conservatives in crisis will be essential reading for students of contemporary British politics. Mark Garnett is a Visiting Fellow in the Department of Politics at the University of Leicester. Philip Lynch is a Senior Lecturer in Politics at the University of Leicester. Lynch Garnett eds and In memory of Martin Lynch THE CONSERVATIVES IN CRISIS The Tories after 1997 edited by Mark Garnett and Philip Lynch Manchester University Press Manchester and New York distributed exclusively in the USA by Palgrave Copyright © Manchester University Press 2003 While copyright in the volume as a whole is vested in Manchester University Press, copyright in individual chapters belongs to their respective authors. -
The Impact of European Monetary Integration on the Labour and Conservative Parties in Britain, 1983–2003
University of Denver Digital Commons @ DU Electronic Theses and Dissertations Graduate Studies 8-1-2011 The Impact of European Monetary Integration on the Labour and Conservative Parties in Britain, 1983–2003 Denise Froning University of Denver Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.du.edu/etd Part of the Economics Commons, and the International Relations Commons Recommended Citation Froning, Denise, "The Impact of European Monetary Integration on the Labour and Conservative Parties in Britain, 1983–2003" (2011). Electronic Theses and Dissertations. 214. https://digitalcommons.du.edu/etd/214 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate Studies at Digital Commons @ DU. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ DU. For more information, please contact [email protected],[email protected]. THE IMPACT OF EUROPEAN MONETARY INTEGRATION ON THE LABOUR AND CONSERVATIVE PARTIES IN BRITAIN, 1983-2003 __________ A Dissertation Presented to the Faculty of the Josef Korbel School of International Studies University of Denver __________ In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy __________ by Denise Froning August 2011 Advisor: Frank Laird ©Copyright by Denise Froning 2011 All Rights Reserved Author: Denise Froning Title: THE IMPACT OF EUROPEAN MONETARY INTEGRATION ON THE LABOUR AND CONSERVATIVE PARTIES IN BRITAIN, 1983-2003 Advisor: Frank Laird Degree Date: August 2011 ABSTRACT -
Loud Signatures Comparing Evaluative Discourse Styles: Rants and Riffs1 Versus Measured Tones
Loud signatures Comparing evaluative discourse styles: rants and riffs1 versus measured tones This paper is intended as a contribution to the investigation of evaluation in texts and in particular as a contribution to Corpus Assisted Discourse Studies (or CADS), defined as a meeting of two disciplines, that of corpus linguistics and that of discourse analysis. One of the main points of CADS lies in the importance given to the systematic observation of naturally occurring data over and above the study of isolated data picked out from individual texts. This approach is particularly useful in the investigation of particular discourse types, text types or genres, to confirm intuitions which are part of the competent native speaker’s knowledge, but it can also help to reveal underlying attitudes and make explicit persuasive devices. Here, two small subcorpora are compared in order to identify the differences in evaluative styles with particular reference to textual interaction, priming, and the resources of engagement. 1.1 The background In attempts to maximise exposure to language and to provide current affairs and cultural input during language learning, EFL students are often encouraged to read newspapers and in particular British broadsheets which provide a good source of naturally occurring language for learner investigations. However the clarity and accessibility of the content and of the language data can be limited for the reader who is unfamiliar with this evaluative style. In my university teaching context I used a 100-million word corpus of newspapers (Papers 93)i as a reference corpus in work in language teaching and found repeatedly that the language data was not helping to clarify either form or meaning problems for students, making the consultation of concordances less useful for our purpose than I had hoped. -
The Shifting Landscape of Prime Ministerial Accountability to Parliament
The shifting landscape of prime ministerial accountability to parliament: An analysis of Liaison Committee scrutiny sessions Paper presented to the PSA Annual Conference, 21-23 March 2016, Brighton. Alexandra Kelso, Mark Bennister and Phil Larkin Alexandra Kelso, Department of Politics and International Relations, School of Social Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton SO17 1BJ, UK. email: [email protected] Mark Bennister, School of Psychology, Politics and Sociology, Canterbury Christ Church University, Canterbury CT1 1QU, UK. email: [email protected] Phil Larkin, Institute for Governance and Policy Analysis, University of Canberra, ACT 2601, AUS. email: [email protected] Abstract Prime ministerial power is always contingent, based on the utilisation of personal and institutional resources, subject to various formal and informal constraints. Parliament is both a political resource to be utilised, but also a veto-player. In the absence of formal mechanisms setting out the requirements for UK prime ministerial accountability to parliament, a fluid and essentially personalised relationship has developed. Regular prime ministerial appearances before the House of Commons Liaison Committee, begun in 2002, have added to parliament’s scrutiny toolkit. This article considers the accountability of the prime minister to parliament by analysing the emergence and development of the Liaison Committee evidence sessions, and draws on interviews with participants and examination of the session transcripts, in order to assess the value of this scrutiny mechanism within the broader framework of prime ministerial-legislative relations. A revised version of this paper is forthcoming in BJPIR; if you wish to cite, please use the published article. 1 Introduction Standing at the apex of the ministerial ‘cone’ that characterizes UK central government (Mackintosh 1962, 452), the prime minister is an obviously powerful political actor, and one who prompts extensive debate both about how executive powers are utilised and how they are constrained. -
PSA Awards 2009
POLITICAL STUDIES ASSOCIATION AWARDS 2009 24 NOVEMBER 2009 Institute of Directors, 116 Pall Mall, London SW1Y 5ED Welcome I am delighted to be able to welcome you to the 2009 Political Studies Association Awards Ceremony. The Political Studies Association is the main association in the UK responsible for developing and promoting political studies. Its growing membership now numbers over 1700 and there has been a parallel increase in the range of its publications, activities and specialist groups. Next year will see the Association’s sixtieth anniversary, to be celebrated in a variety of ways, including special publications and events. As part of these celebrations, in 2010 the Association will launch a new magazine publication, Political Insight, to present political research in an accessible manner to a broader audience. This is the eighth Awards Ceremony to be held by the Association. Each year the Awards Ceremony provides an opportunity to recognise those academics, journalists and politicians who have made an exceptional contribution to public political life either over the preceding year, or over the duration of their careers. This last year has presented unusually demanding challenges, most strikingly in relation to the economic crisis and then the crisis of public confidence in parliament. For many of the award categories the jury had to decide between a large number of nominations. However particular individuals stood out in terms of fulfilling the awards criteria and they are our winners today. As ever thanks are due to all those who have helped to make the Awards Ceremony possible. Thanks go to our jurors and to Professor Lord Bhikhu Parekh for hosting the jurors’ meeting.