GENERAL COUNSEL C.W.Hisgen

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

GENERAL COUNSEL C.W.Hisgen OFFICE OT FEC Complaint RevB GENERAL COUNSEL C.W.Hisgen 7!1I9 H'M 70 PH |: 48 ' Las Vegas Nevada ^ 89107-1103 SENSITIVE Junl9,2018 Office of the General Counsel i I I Federal Elections Commission [wl IIR S / ^ ( 999 "E" Street NW IV«w i rr Washington DC 20463 By E-Mail and U.S. Mail » CO c_ cr Re; Written Complaint against Danny Tarkanian rvf " » t and Danny Tarkanian for Congress campaign of 2012 ~c< Dear Sir / Madame: Complaintant, as undersigned, hereby requests an immediate investigation into an illegal cop'%ate contribution made to a Federal campaign committee, Tarkanian For Congress. Danny Tarkanian was a candidate for Federal office and is also a current candidate for Federal office. In 2012 he used impermitted funds from an LLC he owns and controls, JAMD LLC, directly, and corporate funds from a public charity he owns and controls, the Tarkanian Basketball Academy, indirectly, in each case "in the name of another" to his 2012 Federal campaign committee, Tarkanian For Congress. His use of JAMD LLC was as a conduit for charity finds as will be shown. Complaintant cautions the FEC that Danny Tarkanian has been adjudicated a fraud, specifically frandulant transfer of assets: "steps were undertaken to both hinder and delay the collection efforts of creditors" in a bankruptcy proceeding (Case-13-20495-mkn-Doc-l 86 Memorandum Decision). Consequently any documents or testimony taken from him by commission investigators need to be thoroughly checked and positively vetted. The information identified herein was unknowable until it came to light during candidate Danny Tarkanian's bankruptcy proceedings as found in Federal Bankruptcy court Case 13-20495-mkn. Because the statutes of limitations on these offenses expire in 2019, complaintant respectfully requests that the Federal Election Comission, and if necessary the IRS and the FBI, kindly expedite the Comission's investigation into this matter. Background In 2018, Danny Tarkanian is again running for US Congress. I say again because this year he is running in Nevada CD3 for the second time. This complaint concerns matters from his 2012 campaign for congress in CD4. Again, the claimed unlawful activities were deliberately concealed and did not come to light until his bankruptcy litigation begining in 2013 and testimony given under oath bv him in May 2014. Factual Assertions Charity Problems Tarkanian Basketball Academy Inc. (TarkBBA) Mr. Tarkanian and his brother George Tarkanian founded a public charity, the Tarkanian Basketball Jun 19,2018 1 10:10:06 AM FEC Complaint RevB C.W.Hisgen Academy, Inc in Las Vegas Nevada in 2001 or 2002. The transcripts and documents provide two different dates. The Exhibits in Case 13-20495-mkn Doc 158 page 25 show 2001. The hearing transcript in Case 13-20495-mkn Doc 159 page 45 line 25 and page 46 lines 1:3: 'J " 25 And then the third one is the Tarkanian . 1 Basketball Academy which I briefly discussed which is a 2 sports facility that I started in 2002 I believe with my 3 brother. 'i-. The Tarkanian Basketball Academy Inc received its tax exampt status in 2003. Public charties organized under IRS Section 501(c)(3) are prohibited from participating "in, or intervene in (including the publishing or distributing of statements), any political campaign on behalf of (or in opposition to) any candidate for public office." Mr. Tarkanian will no doubt assert that the funds from the Tarkanian Basketball Academy, Inc were funds owed to him from a $2.2 million loan he made when founding the public charity. A thorough examination of his IRS 990 filings for the Tarkanian Basketball Academy quickly demonstrate that this is impossible. Nowhere on any of the filings from 2004 to 2015 is a liability the size of $2.2 million carried on the books. From 2004 forward, no liability is carried at all. Complaintent asks that the commission look at the page for "assets and liabilities" and specifically under the entiy for "Loans from officers, directors, trustees, and key employeees" which is blank for the begining of the year and the end of the year. This is true for each of the years 2004,2005, 2006,2007,2008, 2009, 2010,2011, 2012,2013, 2014, and 2015. This makes any assertion that funds taken out of Tarkanian Basketball Academy in any of these yearsuntrue. In 2012 alone the Tarkanian Basketball Academy appears to have "loaned" over $112,221 to JAMD, LLC, a property company over which Danny Tarkanian has checkbook control. The use of a public charity and its "excess cash flow" to bankroll or fund a private for profit business is not permitted. Nor is the diversion of funds from the public charity, directly or indirectly, to fund a political campaign. The details of this information come from a deposition made by Danny Tarkanian on 20 May 2014. As of the day of his deposition the "loan" had not yet been paid back. This for a $40,000 amount paid out on June 30,2012. The statute of limitations for FEC matters is five years. Since the activity of indirectly making a payment to his campaign from the charity only came to light as a result of the bankruptcy lawsuit in 2013 and deposition in May 2014, the statute of limitations did start until May 2014. Case-13-20495-mkn Doc 159, page 71, lines 1:7 Case-13-20495-mkn Doc 159, page 71, lines 8:19 extracted and shown below: 1 Q. Mr. Tarkanian, I believe you mentioned that you had 2 been borrowing — or JAMD had been borrowing money from 3 the Tarkanian Basketball Academy, right? 4 A. It did on occasions, yes. 5 Q. What did you do with the $40,000 amount that the 6 Tarkanian Basketball Academy borrowed from JAMD on 7 June 28th of 2012? 8 A. It lent it to JAMD, and it went into JAMD's account. 9 Q. And then didn't that money go into your account 10 after that? 11 A. It went into the congressional campaign account. Jun 19,2018 2 10:10:06 AM FEC Complaint RevB C.W.Hisgen 12 Well, it probably went into my account first, yes. 13 Q. Okay. And then you withdrew that same $40,000 on 14 June 28th of 2012, correct? 15 A. Yes. 16 Q. Have you personally repaid that $40,000 back to the 17 nonprofit that it came out of? 18 A. I didn't personally borrow it from it. JAMD did, 19 and JAMD has not repaid it back yet. JAMD, LLC Corporation or Partnership JAMD LLC is a limited liability company (LLC). From the court transcripts, exhibits, and public records it is impossible to determine if JAMD LLC is handled as a corporation or a partnership by its owners. JAMD, LLC lists no corporate stock on its registration. The exhibits provided in the bankruptcy case in Case-13-20495-mkn Doc 123-9 do not indicate a partitioning of JAMD LLC by shares of stock, but, rather by percentages allocated to the various partners. Exhibit C, Pages 13-29,. In the absence of a declaration JAMD, LLC is handled as a corporation, it is entirely reasonable to ascertain that JAMD, LLC is a partnership. For purposes of the charge herein it does not matter. JAMD LLC's role in this was as an entitiy with interests indestinguishable from Danny's and over which he had operational and checkbook control and consequently served as a conduit to mask his actions. , Complaintant's Analysis and Understanding of FEC Rules Campaigns may not accept contributions from the treasury funds of corporations, labor organizations or national banks. This prohibition applies to any incorporated organization, including a nonstock corporation, a trade association, an incorporated membership organization and an incorporated cooperative. Incorporated charitable organizations— like other corporations — are prohibited from making contributions in connection with federal elections. Unlike most other corporations, charities face additional restrictions on political activity under provisions of the internal revenue code. Contributions in the name of another; CFR Title 11 Section 110.4 A contribution made by one person in the name of another is prohibited. For example, an individual who has already contributed up to the limit to the campaign may not give money to another person to make a contribution to the same candidate. Similarly, a corporation is prohibited from using bonuses or other methods of reimbursing employees for their contributions. Contributions CFR Title 11 Section 114.1 Definitions. (a) For purposes of part 114— (1) The terms contribution and expenditure shall include any direct or indirect payment, distribution, loan, advance, deposit, or gift of money, or any services, or anything of value (except a loan of money by a State bank, a federally chartered depository institution (including a national bank) or a depository institution whose deposits and accounts are insured by tlie Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation or the National Credit Union administration, if such loan is made in accordance with 11 CFR 100.82(a) through (d)) to any Jun 19,2018 3 10:10:06 AM FEC Complaint RevB C.W.Hisgen candidate, political party or committee, organization, or any other person in connection with any election to any of the offices referred to in 11 CFR 114.2 (a) or (b) as applicable. Complaintant's Conclusions Complaintant has reviewed applicable FEC regulations. Based on Complaintant's read of the transcripts and read of the FEC regulations, complaintant reasonably believes that the following CFR Title 11 sections have been violated as discussed above: CFR 11 Section 110.4 Count (1) Contributions made by one person in the name of another: money from the J AMD LLC Partnership contributed in a manner to appear as a loan from the candidate, Danny Tarkanian.
Recommended publications
  • The Republican Party and the Chamber of Secrets How the U.S
    December 7, 2016 www.citizen.org The Republican Party and the Chamber of Secrets How the U.S. Chamber of Commerce Waved Its Dark Money Wand on the 2016 Elections and Elected a Slew of GOP Politicians Beholden to Big Business Acknowledgments This report was written by Grace Aylmer, Campaign Coordinator for Public Citizen’s U.S. Chamber Watch division and edited by U.S. Chamber Watch Director Dan Dudis and Congress Watch Director Lisa Gilbert. About Public Citizen Public Citizen is a national non-profit organization with more than 400,000 members and supporters. We represent consumer interests through lobbying, litigation, administrative advocacy, research, and public education on a broad range of issues including consumer rights in the marketplace, product safety, financial regulation, worker safety, safe and affordable health care, campaign finance reform and government ethics, fair trade, climate change, and corporate and government accountability. Public Citizen’s Congress Watch 215 Pennsylvania Ave. S.E Washington, D.C. 20003 P: 202-546-4996 F: 202-547-7392 http://www.citizen.org © 2016 Public Citizen Public Citizen The Republican Party and the Chamber of Secrets Introduction The U.S. Chamber of Commerce (Chamber) was the second largest overall non-disclosing (or “dark money”) outside spender in 2016 federal races after the National Rifle Association, and was the largest non-disclosing outside spender on 2016 congressional races. Additionally, the Chamber was the largest non-disclosing outside spender in 75 percent of the races in which it spent money. The Chamber involved itself most heavily in races for the U.S. Senate, spending a total of $25.8 million in 10 Senate races.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 in the Shadow of Trump: How the 2016 Presidential Contest Affected
    In the Shadow of Trump: How the 2016 Presidential Contest Affected House and Senate Primaries Prepared for the 2017 State of the Parties Conference, Akron, Ohio Robert G. Boatright, Clark University [email protected] The presidential race did not quite monopolize all of the uncivil or bizarre moments of the summer of 2016. One of the more interesting exchanges took place in Arizona in August of 2016, during the weeks before the state’s Senate primary election. Senator John McCain, always a somewhat unpredictable politician, has had difficulties in his last two primaries. Perhaps because he was perceived as having strayed too far toward the political center, or perhaps simply because his presidential bid had created some distance between McCain and Arizonans, he faced a vigorous challenge in 2010 from conservative talk show host and former Congressman J. D. Hayworth. McCain ultimately beat back Hayworth’s challenge, 56 percent to 32 percent, but only after a bitter campaign in which McCain spent a total of over $21 million and abandoned much of his “maverick” positioning and presented himself as a staunch conservative and a fierce opponent of illegal immigration (Steinhauer 2010). His task was made easier by his ability to attack Hayworth’s own checkered career in Congress. In 2016, McCain again faced a competitive primary opponent, physician, Tea Party activist, and two-term State Senator Kelli Ward. Ward, like Hayworth, argued that McCain was not conservative enough for Arizona. Ward was (and is), however, a decade younger than Hayworth, and her shorter tenure in political office made it harder for McCain to attack her.
    [Show full text]
  • Rosen V. Tarkanian 135 Nev. Adv. Op. No. 59 (2019)
    135 Nev., Advance Opinion 561 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA JACKY ROSEN, AN INDIVIDUAL; AND No. 73274 ROSEN FOR NEVADA, A 527 ORGANIZATION, Appellants, FILE vs. DANNY TARKANIAN, DEC 1 2 2019 Respondent. Appeal from a district court order denying an anti-SLAPP special motion to dismiss in a tort action. Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Jerry A. Wiese, Judge. Reversed and remanded with instructions. Perkins Coie LLP and Marc E. Elias, Elisabeth C. Frost, and Amanda R. Callais, Washington, D.C.; Wolf, Rifkin, Shapiro, Schulman & Rabkin, LLP, and Bradley Schrager and Daniel Bravo, Las Vegas, for Appellants. Randazza Legal Group, PLLC, and Marc J. Randazza and Alex J. Shepard, Las Vegas, for Respondent. SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA IGI- 9-041)-b BEFORE THE COURT EN BANC.' OPINION By the Court, HARDESTY, J.: In this appeal, we consider the appropriate test for determining if protected communications are made in "good faith" under Nevada's anti- SLAPP statutes. At issue in this case are allegedly defamatory statements made by appellant Jacky Rosen during her political campaign against respondent Danny Tarkanian. After being sued for defamation by Tarkanian, Rosen filed a special motion to dismiss the action under the anti- SLAPP statutes, which require her to demonstrate that the protected statements were made in good faith—that is, that they were true or made without knowledge of any falsehood. We hold that, in determining whether the communications were made in good faith, the court must consider the "gist or stine of the communications as a whole, rather than parsing individual words in the communications.
    [Show full text]
  • Rosen Leads Tarkanian by 6 Points in Nevada's 3Rd
    TO: Interested Parties FROM: DCCC Targeting and Analytics Department DATE: June 28, 2016 ROSEN LEADS TARKANIAN BY 6 POINTS IN NEVADA’S 3RD CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICT ROSEN LEADS BY 6 Democrat Jacky Rosen leads Republican Danny Tarkanian by 50% 6 points (40% to 34%, with 26% undecided) in a DCCC survey 40% of likely general election voters conducted in Nevada’s third 30% district on June 18-19, 2016. 20% Tarkanian performs worse than Michael Roberson, who 10% trailed a hypothetical general election matchup to Rosen by 0% one point in a March 2016 DCCC poll. Rosen Tarkanian HILLARY CLINTON HAS AN 8-POINT LEAD OVER DONALD TRUMP In the presidential contest, Democrat Hillary Clinton leads Republican Donald Trump by 8 points (43% to 35%). ROSEN WINS HISPANICS/LATINOS AND INDEPENDENTS, CONSOLIDATES DEMOCRATS Rosen leads with registered independents by 5 points (32% to 27%) and Hispanic/Latino voters by 37 points (58% to 21%). Rosen also consolidates 74% of registered Democrats, up from 61% against Michael Roberson in the March 2016 poll. TARKANIAN HAS A NET NEGATIVE PROFILE IN THE DISTRICT Voters in the district hold an unfavorable view of Tarkanian (-13 net, 22% fav to 35% unfav) and his extreme conservative profile. Tarkanian’s ties to Trump are also a liability in this district, as 59% of voters have an unfavorable view of Trump. A mainly suburban (47.0%) district, Nevada’s third congressional district runs along the southern tip of the state and includes portions of Las Vegas and Henderson. The Citizen Voting Age Population is 12.5% Asian American/Pacific Islander, 11.8% Hispanic/Latino, and 6.9% African American.
    [Show full text]
  • The Power of the Latino Vote in America They Tipped Elections in 2008; Where Will They Be in 2010?
    The Power of the Latino Vote in America They Tipped Elections in 2008; Where Will they be in 2010? February 2010 LATINO VOTER TRENDS IN RECENT ELECTION CYCLES Over the past decade, Latino voters have steadily increased their political power, and made a decisive impact in races at all levels, including the Presidency. In 2010, Latino voters are poised to play a crucial role in key House and Senate races across the country. Many analysts have noted that as the Latino electorate grows in size and power, candidates from all political parties must take their views into account to remain viable in an increasing number of House and Senate races as well as future Presidential contests. While trending Democratic overall, at least one segment of the Latino electorate—foreign‐born, naturalized U.S. citizens of Latino descent, who represent 40% of the Latino voter population—has proven to be a true swing constituency. Candidates for political office in 2010, elected officials, and political strategists would be wise to not just look at how Latino voters are likely to vote this cycle, but why. This report lays out trends in Latino voting patterns over the last several years, and examines some of the factors that motivate and influence this segment of the electorate. The report features a list of “Races to Watch”—forty battleground House and Senate contests where Latino voters will play a key role—and details the Congressional districts where Latino voting power is most concentrated. The Latino Vote is Growing – In Size and Geographic Diversity For the past few election cycles, Latino voters have been making an impact at ballot boxes throughout the country.
    [Show full text]
  • The 2010 Senate Landscape Is Almost Evenly Split Down The
    ELECTION 2010 ELECTION 2010 The 2010 Senate landscape is almost evenly split down the middle: Republicans will be defending 18 seats, while Democrats will be defending 19 seats, including the January special election in Massachusetts. The Senate Watchlist BY CHARLES MAHTESIAN CONNECTICUT NEVada ARKANSAS COLORADO PENNSYLVANIA LOUISIANA CALIFORNIA NORTH CAROLINA WHY TO WATCH WHY TO WATCH WHY TO WATCH WHY TO WATCH WHY TO WATCH WHY TO WATCH WHY TO WATCH WHY TO WATCH Chris Dodd, a five-term Democrat, is arguably The only thing stopping Senate Majority Leader In a state where John McCain crushed Barack Democrat Michael Bennet, appointed Democratic Sen. Arlen Specter faces what may Just when it looked like GOP Sen. David Democratic Sen. Barbara Boxer won a There’s no scandal or silver-bullet issue. He’s the party’s most vulnerable Senate incumbent — Harry Reid from being rated as the most vulnerable Obama by 20 points in 2008 and where polls show to the Senate seat left vacant when Ken be the toughest election of his Senate career, Vitter might weather the scandal surrounding second term in 1998 by 10 percentage points reasonably well-funded. And unlike former GOP just look at the lengthy list of Republicans who are Democratic senator is the quality of his opposition. voters are deeply skeptical of Obama’s health care Salazar became interior secretary, has two which is saying something given the long arc of his the revelation that he was a client of a and a third in 2004 by 20 points. colleague Sen. Elizabeth Dole, who lost by a champing at the bit to take him on.
    [Show full text]
  • UNLV "Rebels" 1982 Preseason Basketball Prospectus
    UNLV Basketball Programs UNLV Athletics 1982 UNLV "Rebels" 1982 Preseason Basketball Prospectus University of Nevada, Las Vegas Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalscholarship.unlv.edu/basketball_programs Part of the American Popular Culture Commons, and the Civic and Community Engagement Commons Repository Citation University of Nevada, Las Vegas (1982). UNLV "Rebels" 1982 Preseason Basketball Prospectus. Available at: https://digitalscholarship.unlv.edu/basketball_programs/103 This Pamphlet is protected by copyright and/or related rights. It has been brought to you by Digital Scholarship@UNLV with permission from the rights-holder(s). You are free to use this Pamphlet in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. For other uses you need to obtain permission from the rights-holder(s) directly, unless additional rights are indicated by a Creative Commons license in the record and/or on the work itself. This Pamphlet has been accepted for inclusion in UNLV Basketball Programs by an authorized administrator of Digital Scholarship@UNLV. For more information, please contact [email protected]. UNXT Runnin' Rebels I I ~~ · ,t l I - f. ~ ~ ~i ' ' ,~- . ~ I Larry Anderson Sidney Green 6-6 Senior 6-9 Senior Danny Tarkanian 6-2 Junior 1982 Preseason Basketball Prospectus 1982 UNLV BASKETBALL STAFF f h u t ir tr: A Pr Major College - 14 Years AT UNLV (l 1968-73 - Cal State Long Beach NCAA Tournament A 122-20 (.859) 1975-76· UN 1973-82 - UNL V NCAA Final Four - 3rd Place th 202-63 (. 762) 1977 at Total - 324-83 (.796) NIT Final Four - 4th Place 1980 19 p NIT Participant - 2nd Round 1982 F He As JERRY TARKANIAN 'Winningest Active College Basketball Coach In America' As Ma Se AU A Ass MARK WARKENTIEN TIM GRGURICH Ath Assistant Coach Assistant Coach 1982 UNLV PRESEASON BASKETBALL PROSPECTUS r~DCOACH JERRY TARKANIAN--Enters 1982-83 as the winningest active basketball coach in America and the third winningest of all time.
    [Show full text]
  • Murs 6606 & 6676 Tarkanian for Cong
    FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20463 VIA FIRST CLASS MAIL Christie Hastie JUN 3 0 20tt Tarkanian for Congress 3008 Campbell Circle Las Vegas, NV 89107 RE; MURs 6606 & 6676 Tarkanian for Congress and Chrissie Hastie in her official capacity as treasurer Danny Tarkanian 7 Dear Ms. Hastie: 8 On July 18, 2012 and January 16, 2013, the Federal Election Commission (the "Commission") notified Tarkanian for Congress and you in your official capacity as treasurer (the "Committee") and Danny Tarkanian of complaints alleging violations of the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971, as amended. On June 24, 2014, based upon the information in the complaints and information that the Committee provided, the Commission found no reason to believe that the Committee violated 2 U.S.C. §§ 441a, 441a(f), and 441 b(a). The Commission dismissed a separate allegation that the Committee violated 2 U.S.C. § 441b(a) and the remaining allegations in the complaints. The Commission closed its files in these matters on June 24, 2014. The Commission encourages the Committee and Mr. Tarkanian to review the enclosed Factual and Legal Analysis, which sets forth the statutory and regulatory provisions considered by the Commission in this matter. The Commission reminds the Committee that: 1. Under 2 U.S.C. § 441 b(a), it is unlawful for the Committee to accept or receive any prohibited contribution, including contributions from corporations; 2. Under 11 C.F.R. § 103.3(b)(1), that the Committee's treasurer is responsible for examining all contributions received for evidence of illegality and for ascertaining whether contributions received, when aggregated with other contributions from the same contributor, exceed the contributions limitations; 3.
    [Show full text]
  • 2018 Senate Ratings 2018 S
    This issue brought to you by North Dakota Senate: Heitkamp Hoping for Another Home Run Campaign MAY 4, 2018 VOLUME 2, NO. 9 By Leah Askarinam The map of competitive Senate races has opened up to some unexpected places. One year ago, it seemed unlikely that we’d be 2018 Senate Ratings discussing2018 whether Democrats Senate could win a RatingsSenate seat in Tennessee or Toss-Up Texas, let alone that the GOP would lose a seat in Alabama. But North Dakota has been on the map sinceToss-Up the day after the November 2012 Donnelly (D-Ind.) McCaskill (D-Mo.) election,Donnelly when (D-Ind.) Heidi Heitkamp squeakedManchin out a(D-W.Va.) victory to keep the seat in Heitkamp (D-N.D.) Nelson (D-Fla.) Democratic hands. Heitkamp (D-N.D.) McCaskill (D-Mo.) Heller (R-Nev.) AZ Open (Flake, R) Just a couple years before Heitkamp ran for Senate, North Dakota’s Manchin (D-W.Va.) congressionalHeller (R-Nev.)# delegation was entirely Democratic. Two of those seats fell Tilt Democratic Tilt Republican toTilt Republicans Democratic before Heitkamp tookTilt office—one Republican was ousted by a GOP challenger, and another retired. Republicans were confident that they’d Baldwin (D-Wis.) Baldwin (D-Wis.) take over the third seat in a state where President Barack Obama was Nelson (D-Fla.) Tester (D-Mont.) unpopular. But Heitkamp ran a near-perfect campaign and Democrats Lean Democratic Lean Republican heldTester the (D-Mont.) seat by nine-tenths of a percentage point. Brown (D-Ohio) TN Open (Corker, R) LeanThis Democratictime around, a couple thingsLean remain Republican the same.
    [Show full text]
  • Candidates Asked Views on Pressing Issues at Las Vegas Forum by Ramona Giwargis / Las Vegas Review-Journal - October 18, 2018
    Candidates Asked Views on Pressing Issues at Las Vegas Forum By Ramona Giwargis / Las Vegas Review-Journal - October 18, 2018 Governor candidate Steve Sisolak tore into rival Adam Laxalt for missing a candidate forum Thursday before tackling questions about maintaining the state’s Medicaid expansion, investing in affordable housing and cracking down on predatory payday lenders. Sisolak, the Democratic gubernatorial nominee, told the crowd at the Nevadans for the Common Good forum that he had 12 events to attend earlier in the Governor candidate Steve Sisolak speaks at the Nevadans for the Common Gook forum at West Prep in Las Vegas on Oct. 18, 2018. day, but he still showed up. (Photo by Ramona Giwargis/L.V. Review-Journal) “I could have stayed away because I didn’t want to answer hard questions, but I didn’t do that,” Sisolak said to applause and cheers. “I came here to answer your questions, and I wish my opponent would have been here.” Laxalt campaign spokesman Parker Briden said Laxalt couldn’t attend because he was at an event in Reno. Congressional District 4 candidate Steven Horsford Nevadans for the Common Good, a bipartisan federation of speaks at the Nevadans for the Common Good forum October 18, 2018(Photo by Ramona Giwargis/LVRJ) 46 faith-based organizations and nonprofits, posed questions to nearly 20 candidates about issues such as immigration, education, health care, housing, transportation and payday lending. Sisolak was joined by Democratic Rep. Jacky Rosen, who is challenging incumbent GOP Sen. Dean Heller, and 4th Congressional District candidate Democrat Steven Horsford and 3rd Congressional District candidates Democrat Susie Lee and Republican Danny Tarkanian.
    [Show full text]
  • Heller Would Oust Ensign in Primary
    FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE January 10, 2011 INTERVIEWS: DEAN DEBNAM 888-621-6988 / 919-880-4888 (serious media inquiries only please, other questions can be directed to Tom Jensen) QUESTIONS ABOUT THE POLL: TOM JENSEN 919-744-6312 Heller would oust Ensign in primary Raleigh, N.C. – Last week’s release showed John Ensign trailing every possible Democrat, should he decide to seek another term in 2012. It also showed Dean Heller beating those same Democrats. Part of Heller’s comparative strength was not only a greater appeal across the aisle but also within the party. Indeed, if Heller were the sole challenger to Ensign in a primary right now, he would soundly defeat the incumbent, 52- 34. Even when given seven possible choices, 30% of reliable Republicans choose Heller, and only 20% pick Ensign, with Sue Lowden and Danny Tarkanian following at 12% and 10%, respectively, Sharron Angle at 9%, Brian Krolicki at 6%, and John Chachas at 5%. Behind Ensign’s weak 53-30 intraparty approval rating is a 59-25 margin with conservatives, but he is dragged down a bit by moderates, who split, 40-40. As such, conservatives are actually in favor of Ensign running again, but only by a 47-38 margin. For moderates, that is flipped; they side against his re-election bid, 32-48. Therefore, it is no surprise that moderates are the driving force behind Heller’s 30-20 lead in the multi-candidate slate; with them, Heller gets 30% to Ensign’s 14%, not far above Lowden and Tarkanian. With conservatives, Heller leads only 30-23.
    [Show full text]
  • Tarkanian Received More Than $700,000 from a Children's Charity
    Tarkanian received more than $700,000 from a children’s charity he founded, including paying himself over half a million dollars, including some while the charity had a six-figure deficit, and moved money from the charity to help pay off debts of his political campaign. Tarkanian Basketball Academy Was A Children’s Charity. “But the newest detail — allegations of taking $700,000 from Tarkanian Basketball Academy, a children’s charity founded by Tarkanian in the early 2000s — hasn’t been reported on before this year, and seemed salacious enough to warrant another look.” [Nevada Independent, 2/10/18] 2005-18: Tarkanian Has Received At Least $705,291 In Salary From Tarkanian Basketball Academy. 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Total Tarkanian $7,800 $6,000 $11,000 $34,565 $39,456 $37,970 $0 $0 $0 $127,000 $162,000 $237,000 $42,500 $705,291 Salary 2005-17: Tarkanian Took More Than $662,000 In Salary From Tarkanian Basketball Academy, Earning $237,000 Most Recently. “But the newest detail — allegations of taking $700,000 from Tarkanian Basketball Academy, a children’s charity founded by Tarkanian in the early 2000s — hasn’t been reported on before this year, and seemed salacious enough to warrant another look. […] According to a decade of IRS filings and his 2016-2017 personal finance disclosure (that Heller’s campaign posted on its website), Tarkanian has received just more than $662,000 in salary from the charity since 2005. The biggest chunk of that income is $237,000 in salary income from the nonprofit that he reported on his 2017 financial disclosure form for his current U.S.
    [Show full text]