DOCSLIB.ORG

Mathematical Argumentation and Indian Logic (Nyaya)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Mathematical Argumentation and Indian Logic (Nyaya) FLM 25(2) 6/18/05 2:57 PM Page 26 SECONDARY SCHOOL STUDENTS’ MATHEMATICAL ARGUMENTATION AND INDIAN LOGIC (NYAYA) BRUNO D’AMORE Over a long period of time, I have been observing students known that in India a philosophical doctrine called nyaya (in involved in demonstrating theorems. [1] The demonstrations Sanskrit) opposed the classic Buddhist school. (Nyaya liter- were intended to be individual activity, but were carried out ally means logic, so it is redundant to call the logic of that within a classroom setting and were therefore able to be con- school nyaya.) Nyaya considered rational speculation to sidered as social activity. I noticed that, although there were comprise a fundamental basis for a coherent doctrine of many typologies of more or less spontaneous behaviour pre- knowledge, coming close to what we would now call deduc- sented to satisfy the teacher’s request (i.e., a pattern more or tive logic, relinquished by Buddhist philosophy. less bound to Aristotelian or Megarian-Stoic logic), some stu- The basis of the nyaya school was empiricism: as we shall dents’demonstrative modality could have been thought about see, such logic was consequently quite different from the in a different way from the one expected by the teacher. This Greek Aristotelian model that prevailed throughout the modality brought clearly to mind quite a different kind of Western world at the time. Among other things, Aristotelian logic, highlighting certain factors such as the use of examples logic also shaped, in a form that still persists today, the way or the preliminary enunciation of the thesis. of handling mathematical demonstration. However, while The nyaya approach described in this article shows that this is certainly true at an academic level, it is not so for other cultures have produced intellectual mechanisms of young students at school. [2] ‘truth’ generalization and predication different from Aris- By denying a transcendent principle of the universe (typ- totle’s logic (see, for example, Needham, 1959; D’Amore ical of many Indian doctrines), nyaya built an atomistic and Matteuzzi, 1976; and more recently, Sarma, 2005; physics, within a realistic mould, that supported the exis- Sarukkai, 2005). Both the ideas of collecting evidence of the tence of nine primordial substances and a system of sixteen implicit and unaware use of this logic, along with an analytic objective categories immanent within the real. Its gnosiol- perspective, gave rise to this article. I initially introduce the ogy (philosophy of knowledge) was based on a unity basic elements of this logic, followed by the presentation of between purely sensory knowledge (relative to the external three illustrative cases. I finally present some concluding world) and the conversational one (relative to no matter remarks and reflections. which communicative language). The nyaya doctrine thus I explicitly want to emphasise that my purpose here is acknowledged a form of existence where communicable not to substitute one logical model for another in school edu- concepts are also real entities. cation. From the explorations I have conducted and relate The nyaya school claimed the hegemony of four means of here, it emerges that, in order to reason properly, students gaining knowledge (pramana): have a strong tendency to use particular cases in order to • witness/testimony ‘read’ and ‘see’ the general in them. There is evidence of a • analogy dialectic between generalisation (or abstraction) and con- • perception cretisation (or specialisation) that must necessarily be taken • inference. into account while teaching. Even after this piece of research, I do not believe that I will examine each of these concepts in more detail: these students think in exact accordance with nyaya logic. Witness (sabda) deals with what is reliable from handed- Nevertheless, having recourse to this logic for the analysis of down communication, written or oral. This would include students’ mathematical reasoning highlights the fact that any such things as God’s revelations, handed-down history, didactic analysis presupposes, in one way or another, a prayers and sacred poems. frame of reference: it is possible to use several logical Analogy (upamana, also translated as comparison or frames to account for the students’ deductive behaviour. equivalence) is the way of reasoning that defines an object in Each interpretation of deduction presupposes a logical frame terms of resemblance to others. Note that nyaya analogy of reference, and deviant behaviour is judged only relative to classifies objects according to categories or classes of ana- the particular frame of reference considered. logues, distinguishing between two classes on the basis that they do not have analogous terms. Since an analogy between Some characteristics of the nyaya philosoph- existing objects depends on considerations regarding the ical school object itself (and therefore these are not abstract considera- Although European syllabi seldom take into account the tions but classificatory and experimental ones), this form of study of oriental philosophies, I believe it is fairly well knowledge relates to some present-day concepts also found 26 For the Learning of Mathematics 25, 2 (July, 2005) FLM Publishing Association, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada FLM 25(2) 6/18/05 2:57 PM Page 27 in mathematics. We could refer to geometry, with its closely Application: 4. F(A) from the general related type and proximal genus and specific differences in case, we return to definitions. Or we could mention more developed ones here, the case we are so-called analytic definitions that characterise a class of studying: a force objects through the quotient construction: in other words, by exerts an action means of an equivalence relation. on A Perception (pratyaska) is the relation between the visible Conclusion: 5. P(A) A moves (that which we see with eyes) – or at least with the senses (a relation that is produced by the contact of the sensory organ with the object) – and the image we have of that Classic Buddhist critics argue against the first and the sec- object. I avoid considerations regarding the six senses that ond steps, because they do not belong to true reasoning but nyaya philosophers attributed to human beings, highlighting can nonetheless be included in the thesis. I would like to instead the importance ascribed to the sixth sense, the intel- emphasise that this is frequently carried out in our common lect (manas), because of the regulating and mediating way of reasoning: for example, in didactic action. We point function this ‘organ’ has, with respect to the other five. out the final object of the proof right from the beginning: According to nyaya philosophy, communicable concepts otherwise, it would be impossible to organise that kind of acquire their own reality in contrast with Buddhism that reasoning exactly. I shall return to this issue later on. assigns them the role of a mental image. Buddhists wrongly refused the fifth step, a sort of modus Finally, I consider inference (anumana) that in the nyaya ponens extended to predicate calculus, a logically correct and school represents the sublime stage. The nyaya syllogism (so essential operation for that type of syllogism. The relative called because its form is apparently similar to the Aris- formal linguistic expression is: totelian one) is not widely known. Nyaya distinguished five {(∀X) [(F(X) P(X)) ∧ F(X)] P(X)} {[(F(A) assertive elements in its syllogism (compared with three in P(A)) ∧ F(A)] P(A)} an Aristotelian syllogism): The logical analysis of language, related to the close con- • the statement (pratijna) (not proved; the enuncia- nection assigned to the dichotomous language-object of tion we want to prove) thought, leads to an exact language criticism similar to that • the reason (hetu) of rhetoric in modern times. • the general proposition or enunciation (udaha- According to nyaya, the enemies of correct deduction and rana), followed by an example speaking are: • the application (upanay), also called the second statement • ambiguity (chala), resulting from an improper use • the conclusion (nigamana). of a term (i.e., a wrong use of analogy) • unfinished thinking (jati), looped speech without The following example is a classic nyaya (as well as content Socrates’s pseudo-syllogism for Aristotelian logic): • absurd arguments (nigrahastama), adopted by 1. object A moves (statement); someone without logic: his fate is to be defeated 2. because of a force applied to it (reason); dialectically by someone who operates with logic 3. whenever we apply a force to an object, the object and rational arguments. moves (general proposition); for example: if oxen Nyaya philosophers studied the instances in which their syl- pull a cart, the cart moves (example); logisms led to sophisms. Here are the principal cases of this 4. a force is applied to object A (application); harmful reduction: therefore: 5. object A moves (conclusion). • an incorrect correspondence between the syllo- gism’s constituent parts, therefore there is no It is relatively easy to put this reasoning into symbolic form. relationship between terms Before I proceed to do so, here is a convenient formalism: • an intrinsic absurdity that appears in a term stating Let A, B be given objects, and X a general object; the opposite to that which it should affirm P(X): the open predicate statement, “X moves”; • an explicit absurdity due to the contrast between F(X): “a force is applied to X”. two terms of the syllogism that exclude each other • The open statement F(X) is always true if F(A) is experi- the lack of a proof or a test of one of the terms sup- porting the reasoning mentally verifiable whenever we replace the variable X with • a constant A (we experience its truth through our senses, at the falsity of the major term, the non-existence of least according to nyaya’s empiricist interpretation). the object [3] we are referring to or the attribution Nyaya’s syllogism can be formally interpreted as follows: of false properties to it.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Universals : Studies in Indian Logic and Linguistics / J
    UNIVERSALS Frits Staal UNIVERSALS Studies in Indian Logic and Linguistics The University of Chicago Press Chicago and London FRITS STAAL is professor of philosophy and South Asian languages at the University of California, Berkeley. THE UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO PRESS, CHICAGO 60637 THE UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO PRESS, LTD., LONDON © 1988 by Frits Staal All rights reserved. Published 1988 Printed in the United States of America 97 96 95 94 93 92 91 90 89 88 5 4 3 2 1 Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data Staal, Frits. Universals : studies in Indian logic and linguistics / J. Frits Staal. p. cm. Bibliography: p. Includes index. 1. Hindu logic. 2. Language and logic. 3. Universals (Philosophy) I. Title. BC25.S76 1988 87-23187 160'.954—dcl9 CIP ISBN 0-226-76999-2 (cloth); 0-226-77000-1 (paper) Contents Preface vii Introduction 1 1. Universals, Shadowy and Substantial 1 2. The Evidence from Indian Logic 12 3. The Evidence from Indian Linguistics 29 4. Seven Reviews 35 5. Conclusions 36 Bibliography 51 PART i INDIAN LOGIC 1. Correlations between Language and Logic in Indian Thought. 59 Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies 23 (1960): 109-22 2. Formal Structures in Indian Logic. 73 Synthese: An International Quarterly for the Logical arid Psychological Study of the Foundations of Science 12 (1960): 279-86 3. Means of Formalization in Indian and Western Logic. 81 Proceedings of the XHth International Congress of Philosophy, Florence 10 (1960): 221-27 4. The Theory of Definition in Indian Logic. 88 Journal of the American Oriental Society 81 (1961): 122-26 5.
    [Show full text]
  • Logic in Action: Wittgenstein's Logical Pragmatism and the Impotence of Scepticism
    This is the final, pre-publication draft. Please cite only from published paper in Philosophical Investigations 26:2 (April 2003), 125-48. LOGIC IN ACTION: WITTGENSTEIN'S LOGICAL PRAGMATISM AND THE IMPOTENCE OF SCEPTICISM DANIÈLE MOYAL-SHARROCK UNIVERSITY OF GENEVA 1. The Many Faces of Certainty: Wittgenstein's Logical Pragmatism So I am trying to say something that sounds like pragmatism. (OC 422) In his struggle to uncover the nature of our basic beliefs, Wittgenstein depicts them variously in On Certainty: he thinks of them in propositional terms, in pictorial terms and in terms of acting. As propositions, they would be of a peculiar sort – a hybrid between a logical and an empirical proposition (OC 136, 309). These are the so-called 'hinge propositions' of On Certainty (OC 341). Wittgenstein also thinks of these beliefs as forming a picture, a World-picture – or Weltbild (OC 167). This is a step in the right (nonpropositional) direction, but not the ultimate step. Wittgenstein's ultimate and crucial depiction of our basic beliefs is in terms of a know-how, an attitude, a way of acting (OC 204). Here, he treads on pragmatist ground. But can Wittgenstein be labelled a pragmatist, having himself rejected the affiliation because of its utility implication? But you aren't a pragmatist? No. For I am not saying that a proposition is true if it is useful. (RPP I, 266) Wittgenstein resists affiliation with pragmatism because he does not want his use of use to be confused with the utility use of use. For him, it is not that a proposition is true if it is useful, but that use gives the proposition its sense.
    [Show full text]
  • Logic Model Workbook
    Logic Model Workbook INNOVATION NETWORK, INC. www.innonet.org • [email protected] Logic Model Workbook Table of Contents Page Introduction - How to Use this Workbook .....................................................................2 Before You Begin .................................................................................................................3 Developing a Logic Model .................................................................................................4 Purposes of a Logic Model ............................................................................................... 5 The Logic Model’s Role in Evaluation ............................................................................ 6 Logic Model Components – Step by Step ....................................................................... 6 Problem Statement: What problem does your program address? ......................... 6 Goal: What is the overall purpose of your program? .............................................. 7 Rationale and Assumptions: What are some implicit underlying dynamics? ....8 Resources: What do you have to work with? ......................................................... 9 Activities: What will you do with your resources? ................................................ 11 Outputs: What are the tangible products of your activities? ................................. 13 Outcomes: What changes do you expect to occur as a result of your work?.......... 14 Outcomes Chain ......................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction to Philosophy. Social Studies--Language Arts: 6414.16. INSTITUTION Dade County Public Schools, Miami, Fla
    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 086 604 SO 006 822 AUTHOR Norris, Jack A., Jr. TITLE Introduction to Philosophy. Social Studies--Language Arts: 6414.16. INSTITUTION Dade County Public Schools, Miami, Fla. PUB DATE 72 NOTE 20p.; Authorized Course of Instruction for the Quinmester Program EDRS PRICE MF-$0.65 HC-$3.29 DESCRIPTORS Course Objectives; Curriculum Guides; Grade 10; Grade 11; Grade 12; *Language Arts; Learnin4 Activities; *Logic; Non Western Civilization; *Philosophy; Resource Guides; Secondary Grades; *Social Studies; *Social Studies Units; Western Civilization IDENTIFIERS *Quinmester Program ABSTRACT Western and non - western philosophers and their ideas are introduced to 10th through 12th grade students in this general social studies Quinmester course designed to be used as a preparation for in-depth study of the various schools of philosophical thought. By acquainting students with the questions and categories of philosophy, a point of departure for further study is developed. Through suggested learning activities the meaning of philosopky is defined. The Socratic, deductive, inductive, intuitive and eclectic approaches to philosophical thought are examined, as are three general areas of philosophy, metaphysics, epistemology,and axiology. Logical reasoning is applied to major philosophical questions. This course is arranged, as are other quinmester courses, with sections on broad goals, course content, activities, and materials. A related document is ED 071 937.(KSM) FILMED FROM BEST AVAILABLE COPY U S DEPARTMENT EDUCATION OF HEALTH. NAT10N41
    [Show full text]
  • CONCEPT of UNIVERSAL PROPOSITION (UDHARANA) in NAYAYA PHILOSOPHY Mudasir Ahmad Tantray Lecturer at Dept
    ANVESAK ISSN : 0378 – 4568 UGC Care Group 1 Journal CONCEPT OF UNIVERSAL PROPOSITION (UDHARANA) IN NAYAYA PHILOSOPHY Mudasir Ahmad Tantray Lecturer at Dept. of Philosophy, Govt. Boys College Sopore Email: [email protected] Tariq Rafeeq Khan Lecturer at Dept. of Philosophy, Govt. degree college Women’s Sopore Email: [email protected] ABSTRACT Universal proposition (Udharana) is also known as general proposition or categorical proposition. Universal proposition is defined as the proposition in which the relation between the subject term and the predicate term is without any condition, in which the predicate is either affirmed or denied of the subject unconditionally. In nyaya logic the term vyapti is a universal proposition or invariable relation between the middle term (linga/hetu) and the major term (sadya) . According to the category of relation propositions are divided into categorical and the conditional. Although proposition is a logical entity which is an assertion, either affirm or deny the subject. Truth and falsity are the values of proposition. Universal proposition is of two kinds: universal affirmative proposition and universal negative proposition while universality is the quantity of the subject and affirmation or negation is the quality of the proposition. Anumana (inference) is the knowledge of the objects which follows some other knowledge. In nyaya logic Inference is a combined deductive-inductive reasoning consisting of at least three categorical propositions and in it there are at least three propositions consisting of three terms, viz. the paksa or minor term about which we infer something, the sadhya or major term which inferred object, and the linga(probans) or sadana or middle which is invariably related to the major, and is present in the minor.
    [Show full text]
  • Revised Syllabus for P.G. Courses in Philosophy
    REVISED SYLLABUS FOR P.G. COURSES IN PHILOSOPHY COURSE NO. PHIL/P.G/1.1 Logic (Indian) 1. Nature of Indian Logic: the close relationship of logic, epistemology and metaphysics in the Indian tradition; primacy of logical reasoning in establishing one’ own system and refuting all rival systems; the concepts of ānvikṣikī and anumiti 2. Definition of Anumāna: Nyāya and Buddhist perspectives 3. Constituents of Anumāna: Nyāya and Buddhist perspectives 4. Process of Anumāna: Nyāya and Buddhist perspectives 5. Types of Anumāna: Nyāya and Buddhist perspectives 6. Nyāya: paķṣata, parāmarśa, definition of vyāpti 7. Inductive elements in Indian Logic: the concepts of vyāptigrahopāya, sāmānyalakṣaṇaprātyasatti, tarka, upādhi 8. Hetvābhāsa 9. Jňāniyapratibaddha-pratibandhakābhāva Suggestive Texts: Keśava Miśra: Tarkabhāṣā, ed. by Pandit Badarinath Shukla, Motilal Banarasidas Publishers Ltd., N. Delhi Dharmakīrti: Nyāyabindu, ed. by D. Malvania, Patna, 1971 Uddyotakara: Nyāyavārttika, ed. by M. M. Anantalal Thakur, ICPR Publication, N. Delhi Praśastapādabhāṣya, ed. By Ganganath Jha, Sapurnanda Sanskrit University, Benares Nyāyasūtra – Vātsayanabhāsya (select portions), ed. by MM Phanibhusan Tarkavagish, Rajya Pustak Parshad, WB Viśvanātha,Bhāṣāparichheda, ed. by Pandit Panchanan Shastri with commentary Muktavali- Samgraha, Sanskrita Pustak Bhandar Annambhatta,TarkasaṁgrahawithDipika, ed. by Pandit Panchanan Shastri, Sanskrita Pustak Bhandar (Bengali) Annambhatta,TarkasaṁgrahawithDipika, trans. by Prof. Gopinath Bhattacharya in English, Progressive Pub, 1976 Suggested Readings: S.S. Barlingay,A Modern Introduction to Indian Logic, National Publishing House, 1965 Gangadhar Kar,Tarkabhāsā Vol– I, 2nd ed. Jadavpur University Press, 2009 19 D.C. Guha,Navya Nyaya System of Logic, Motilal Banarsidass, 1979 Nandita Bandyopadhyay,The Concept of Logical Fallacies, Sanskrit Pustak Bhandar, 1977 B.K. Matilal,The Navya Nyaya Doctrine of Negation,Harvard University Press, 1968 B.K.
    [Show full text]
  • Indian Philosophy Encyclopædia Britannica Article
    Indian philosophy Encyclopædia Britannica Article Indian philosophy the systems of thought and reflection that were developed by the civilizations of the Indian subcontinent. They include both orthodox (astika) systems, namely, the Nyaya, Vaisesika, Samkhya, Yoga, Purva-mimamsa, and Vedanta schools of philosophy, and unorthodox (nastika) systems, such as Buddhism and Jainism. Indian thought has been concerned with various philosophical problems, significant among them the nature of the world (cosmology), the nature of reality (metaphysics), logic, the nature of knowledge (epistemology), ethics, and religion. General considerations Significance of Indian philosophies in the history of philosophy In relation to Western philosophical thought, Indian philosophy offers both surprising points of affinity and illuminating differences. The differences highlight certain fundamentally new questions that the Indian philosophers asked. The similarities reveal that, even when philosophers in India and the West were grappling with the same problems and sometimes even suggesting similar theories, Indian thinkers were advancing novel formulations and argumentations. Problems that the Indian philosophers raised for consideration, but that their Western counterparts never did, include such matters as the origin (utpatti) and apprehension (jñapti) of truth (pramanya). Problems that the Indian philosophers for the most part ignored but that helped shape Western philosophy include the question of whether knowledge arises from experience or from reason and distinctions such as that between analytic and synthetic judgments or between contingent and necessary truths. Indian thought, therefore, provides the historian of Western philosophy with a point of view that may supplement that gained from Western thought. A study of Indian thought, then, reveals certain inadequacies of Western philosophical thought and makes clear that some concepts and distinctions may not be as inevitable as they may otherwise seem.
    [Show full text]
  • A Survey of Indian Logic from the Point of View of Computer Science
    Sadhana, "Col. 19, Part 6, December 1994, pp 971-983. © Printed in India A survey of Indian logic from the point of view of computer science V V S SARMA Department of Computer Science & Automation, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore 560012, India Abstract. Indian logic has a long history. It somewhat covers the domains of two of the six schools (darsanas) of Indian philosophy, namely, Nyaya and Vaisesika. The generally accepted definition of In- dian logic over the ages is the science which ascertains valid knowledge either by means of six senses or by means of the five members of the syllogism. In other words, perception and inference constitute the sub- ject matter of logic. The science of logic evolved in India through three ~ges: the ancient, the medieval and the modern, spanning almost thirty centuries. Advances in Computer Science, in particular, in Artificial Intelligence have got researchers in these areas interested in the basic problems of language, logic and cognition in the past three decades. In the 1980s, Artificial Intelligence has evolved into knowledge-based and intelligent system design, and the knowledge base and inference engine have become standard subsystems of an intelligent System. One of the important issues in the design of such systems is knowledge acquisition from humans who are experts in a branch of learning (such as medicine or law) and transferring that knowledge to a computing system. The second important issue in such systems is the validation of the knowl- edge base of the system i.e. ensuring that the knowledge is complete and consistent.
    [Show full text]
  • Anekāntavāda and Dialogic Identity Construction
    religions Article Anekantav¯ ada¯ and Dialogic Identity Construction Melanie Barbato Seminar für Religionswissenschaft und Interkulturelle Theologie, University of Münster, 48143 Münster, Germany; [email protected] Received: 1 November 2019; Accepted: 14 November 2019; Published: 20 November 2019 Abstract: While strong religious identity is often associated with violence, Jainism, one of the world’s oldest practiced religions, is often regarded as one of the most peaceful religions and has nevertheless persisted through history. In this article, I am arguing that one of the reasons for this persistence is the community’s strategy of dialogic identity construction. The teaching of anekantav¯ ada¯ allows Jainas to both engage with other views constructively and to maintain a coherent sense of self. The article presents an overview of this mechanism in different contexts from the debates of classical Indian philosophy to contemporary associations of anekantav¯ ada¯ with science. Central to the argument is the observation that anekantav¯ ada¯ is in all these contexts used to stabilize Jaina identity, and that anekantav¯ ada¯ should therefore not be interpreted as a form of relativism. Keywords: Jainism; anekantav¯ ada¯ ; identity; Indian philosophy; Indian logic 1. Introduction: Religious Identity and the Dialogic Uses of Anekantav¯ ada¯ Within the debate on the role of religion in public life, strong religious identity is often and controversially discussed within the context of violent extremism.1 Strong religion, as in the title of a book by Gabriel A. Almond, R. Scott Appleby and Emmanuel Sivan (Almond et al. 2003), is sometimes just another word for fundamentalism, with all its “negative connotations” (Ter Haar 2003, p.
    [Show full text]
  • A History of Navya-Nyāya Study and Its Future: Tathaivāsmābhir Viyogādāv Api Mantavyam / from the Methodological Point of View
    （34） From Rasa to Bhaktirasa（Okita） Journal of Indian and Buddhist Studies Vol. 65, No. 3, March 2017 （35） atyuṣṇamadhuradugdhavan na tatra rasatvavyāghātaḥ / 19）Prītisandarbha, Anuccheda 111: kiṃ ca svābhāvikālaukikatve sati yathā laukikarasavidāṃ laukikebhyo ’pi kāvyasaṃśrayād alaukikaśaktiṃ dadhānebhyo vibhāvādyākhyāprāptakāraṇādibhyaḥ śokādāv api sukham eva jāyate iti rasatvāpattis A History of Navya-nyāya Study and Its Future: tathaivāsmābhir viyogādāv api mantavyam / From the Methodological Point of View Primary Sources Kane, P. V., ed. 1923. The Sāhityadarpaṇa of Viśvanātha with Notes on Parichchhedas I, II, X and History of Alaṅkāra Literature. 2nd ed. Bombay: Pandurang Vamana Kane. Wada Toshihiro Purīdāsa Mahāśaya, ed. 1951. Śrī-śrīla-śrī-Jīva-gosvāmi-prabhupāda-viracite Ṣaṭsandarbhātmaka-śrī-śrī- Bhāgavatasandarbhe ṣaṣṭhaḥ. śrī-śrī-Prītisandarbha. Vṛndāvana: Haridāsa Śarmaṇa. 1. Method of Research Shastri, J. L., ed. 1983. Bhāgavata Purāṇa of Kṛṣṇa Dvaipāyana Vyāsa with Sanskrit Commentary Bhāvārthabodhinī of Śrīdhara Svāmin. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass. In order to illustrate the history of Navya-nyāya study, I have focused upon the method Śivadatta, Paṇḍit, and Kāśīnāth Paṇḍurang Parab, eds. 1894. The Nāṭyaśāstra of Bharata Muni. of research employed by scholars in the field. There appear to be two major methods, Kāvyamālā 42. Bombay: Nirnaya-Sagara Press. which I have designated as the philosophical and historical. The former method Secondary Sources attempts to present a “rational interpretation” of Navya-nyāya texts based upon Hara, Minoru. 2009. “Divine Procreation.” Indo-Iranian Journal 52: 217–249. principles accepted by this school, 1) their commentaries, or traditional interpretation Lutjeharms, Rembert. 2014. “Can Devotion Become Rasa? Jīva Gosvāmī’s Prīti-sandarbha.” In still alive in India. Research employing this method sometimes lends itself to Caitanya Vaiṣṇava Philosophy: Tradition, Reason, and Devotion, ed.
    [Show full text]
  • Brahma Sutra
    BRAHMA SUTRA CHAPTER 1 1st Pada 1st Adikaranam to 11th Adhikaranam Sutra 1 to 31 INDEX S. No. Topic Pages Topic No Sutra No Summary 5 Introduction of Brahma Sutra 6 1 Jijnasa adhikaranam 1 a) Sutra 1 103 1 1 2 Janmady adhikaranam 2 a) Sutra 2 132 2 2 3 Sastrayonitv adhikaranam 3 a) Sutra 3 133 3 3 4 Samanvay adhikaranam 4 a) Sutra 4 204 4 4 5 Ikshatyadyadhikaranam: (Sutras 5-11) 5 a) Sutra 5 324 5 5 b) Sutra 6 353 5 6 c) Sutra 7 357 5 7 d) Sutra 8 362 5 8 e) Sutra 9 369 5 9 f) Sutra 10 372 5 10 g) Sutra 11 376 5 11 2 S. No. Topic Pages Topic No Sutra No 6 Anandamayadhikaranam: (Sutras 12-19) 6 a) Sutra 12 382 6 12 b) Sutra 13 394 6 13 c) Sutra 14 397 6 14 d) Sutra 15 407 6 15 e) Sutra 16 411 6 16 f) Sutra 17 414 6 17 g) Sutra 18 416 6 18 h) Sutra 19 425 6 19 7 Antaradhikaranam: (Sutras 20-21) 7 a) Sutra 20 436 7 20 b) Sutra 21 448 7 21 8 Akasadhikaranam : 8 a) Sutra 22 460 8 22 9 Pranadhikaranam : 9 a) Sutra 23 472 9 23 3 S. No. Topic Pages Topic No Sutra No 10 Jyotischaranadhikaranam : (Sutras 24-27) 10 a) Sutra 24 486 10 24 b) Sutra 25 508 10 25 c) Sutra 26 513 10 26 d) Sutra 27 517 10 27 11 Pratardanadhikaranam: (Sutras 28-31) 11 a) Sutra 28 526 11 28 b) Sutra 29 538 11 29 c) Sutra 30 546 11 30 d) Sutra 31 558 11 31 4 SUMMARY Brahma Sutra Bhasyam Topics - 191 Chapter – 1 Chapter – 2 Chapter – 3 Chapter – 4 Samanvaya – Avirodha – non – Sadhana – spiritual reconciliation through Phala – result contradiction practice proper interpretation Topics - 39 Topics - 47 Topics - 67 Topics 38 Sections Topics Sections Topics Sections Topics Sections Topics 1 11 1 13 1 06 1 14 2 07 2 08 2 08 2 11 3 13 3 17 3 36 3 06 4 08 4 09 4 17 4 07 5 Lecture – 01 Puja: • Gratitude to lord for completion of Upanishad course (last Chandogya Upanishad + Brihadaranyaka Upanishad).
    [Show full text]
  • The Etienne Gilson Series 21
    The Etienne Gilson Series 21 Remapping Scholasticism by MARCIA L. COLISH 3 March 2000 Pontifical Institute of Mediaeval Studies This lecture and its publication was made possible through the generous bequest of the late Charles J. Sullivan (1914-1999) Note: the author may be contacted at: Department of History Oberlin College Oberlin OH USA 44074 ISSN 0-708-319X ISBN 0-88844-721-3 © 2000 by Pontifical Institute of Mediaeval Studies 59 Queen’s Park Crescent East Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5S 2C4 Printed in Canada nce upon a time there were two competing story-lines for medieval intellectual history, each writing a major role for scholasticism into its script. Although these story-lines were O created independently and reflected different concerns, they sometimes overlapped and gave each other aid and comfort. Both exerted considerable influence on the way historians of medieval speculative thought conceptualized their subject in the first half of the twentieth cen- tury. Both versions of the map drawn by these two sets of cartographers illustrated what Wallace K. Ferguson later described as “the revolt of the medievalists.”1 One was confined largely to the academy and appealed to a wide variety of medievalists, while the other had a somewhat narrower draw and reflected political and confessional, as well as academic, concerns. The first was the anti-Burckhardtian effort to push Renaissance humanism, understood as combining a knowledge and love of the classics with “the discovery of the world and of man,” back into the Middle Ages. The second was inspired by the neo-Thomist revival launched by Pope Leo XIII, and was inhabited almost exclusively by Roman Catholic scholars.
    [Show full text]