A People's Climate Plan for New York City
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Gradualism": the Labour Party and Industry, 1918-1931
ORE Open Research Exeter TITLE The industrial meaning of "gradualism": the Labour party and industry, 1918-1931 AUTHORS Thorpe, Andrew JOURNAL Journal of British Studies DEPOSITED IN ORE 03 March 2008 This version available at http://hdl.handle.net/10036/19512 COPYRIGHT AND REUSE Open Research Exeter makes this work available in accordance with publisher policies. A NOTE ON VERSIONS The version presented here may differ from the published version. If citing, you are advised to consult the published version for pagination, volume/issue and date of publication The Industrial Meaning of "Gradualism": The Labour Party and Industry, 1918-1931 Andrew Thorpe The Journal of British Studies, Vol. 35, No. 1. (Jan., 1996), pp. 84-113. Stable URL: http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0021-9371%28199601%2935%3A1%3C84%3ATIMO%22T%3E2.0.CO%3B2-4 The Journal of British Studies is currently published by The University of Chicago Press. Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use, available at http://www.jstor.org/about/terms.html. JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use provides, in part, that unless you have obtained prior permission, you may not download an entire issue of a journal or multiple copies of articles, and you may use content in the JSTOR archive only for your personal, non-commercial use. Please contact the publisher regarding any further use of this work. Publisher contact information may be obtained at http://www.jstor.org/journals/ucpress.html. Each copy of any part of a JSTOR transmission must contain the same copyright notice that appears on the screen or printed page of such transmission. -
Cultural Identities and National Borders
CULTURAL IDENTITIES AND NATIONAL BORDERS Edited by Mats Andrén Thomas Lindqvist Ingmar Söhrman Katharina Vajta 1 CULTURAL IDENTITIES AND NATIONAL BORDERS Proceedings from the CERGU conference held at the Faculty of Arts. Göteborg University 7-8 June 2007 Eds. Mats Andrén Thomas Linqvist Ingmar Söhrman Katharina Vajta 2 CONTENTS Contributers Opening Addresses Introduction 1. Where, when and what is a language? Ingmar Söhrman 2. Identity as a Cognitive Code: the Northern Irish Paradigm Ailbhe O’Corrain 3. Language and Identity in Modern Spain: Square Pegs in Round Holes? Miquel Strubell 4. Struggling over Luxembourgish Identity Fernand Fehlen 5. Language Landscapes and Static Geographies in the Baltic Sea Area Thomas Lundén 6. The Idea of Europa will be Fullfilled by Muslim Turkey Klas Grinell 7. National identity and the ethnographic museum The Musée du Quai Branly Project: a French answer to multiculturalism? Maud Guichard-Marneuor 8. Främlingsidentitet och mytbildning av den utländske författaren [English summary: Mythmaking of the Foreign Author and a Reflection on the Identity as a Stranger: The Case of the Swedish Author Stig Dagerman in France and Italy] Karin Dahl 9. Den glokale kommissarien: Kurt Wallander på film och TV [English summary: Kurt Wallander on film and TV] Daniel Brodén 10. Staden, staten och medborgarskapet [English summary: Studying “undocumented immigrants” in the city with Lefebvre’s spatial triad as a point of departure] Helena Holgersson 3 11. Digging for Legitimacy: Archeology, Identity and National Projects in Great Britain, Germany and Sweden Per Cornell, Ulf Borelius & Anders Ekelund 12. Recasting Swedish Historical Identity Erik Örjan Emilsson 4 Contributers Mats Andrén is professor in The History of Ideas and Science at Göteborg University from 2005. -
Marxism and Reformism
chapter 5 Marxism and Reformism 1 What were the Theoretical Roots of Reformism? The Tangled Web of ‘Catastrophism’1 The two terms that appear in the title of this chapter, Marxism and reformism, have the singular characteristic of having long lost their specificity in what they denote, and yet also of being used as almost universal categories, as if to desig- nate unambiguous contents whose meaning is generally taken for granted. And the qualities of reformism (reasonableness, pragmatism, gradualism), as coun- terposed to the corresponding lack of such qualities in Marxism (dogmatism, abstractness, revolutionism) are thus fixed in a spatial-temporal dimension in which they always appear the same. Generally, the journalistic-political field has been the privileged terrain for this semantic slippage. But given its weak scientific status, and the inevitable strains coming from themes still running very hot on the political terrain, a far from virtuous circle arises between these political expressions and the institutional spheres meant to be responsible for cool analysis. There are two particular elements that characterise the ways in which this circle tends to be activated: the embryonic-genetic approach, and the absolute counterposition of the terms in question. 1 The ‘catastrophism’ dealt with in this part of the chapter concerns the conceptual whole made to derive (or not) from Marx’s economic categories. As well as this way of considering catastrophism, a not-necessarily-connected and wholly political conception also had a wide circulation, in particular in the Giolittian era. In this latter case ‘catastrophism’ did not consist of the natural result of a process of ‘gradual immiseration’, but of the violent contractions of the passage from the old society to the new one, a passage that would not be without pain. -
Curriculum Vitae
John Craig Freeman Professor of New Media Art Emerson College, Department of Visual and Media Arts 120 Boylston Street Boston, MA. 02116-4624 (617) 824-8862 phone (617) 824-8803 fax [email protected] http://JohnCraigFreeman.net Biography: John Craig Freeman is an artist with over three decades of experience using emerging technologies to produce large-scale public work at sites where the forces of globalization are impacting the lives of individuals in local communities. With his work, Freeman expands the notion of ‘public’ by exploring how digital technology and mobile networks are transforming our sense of place. Freeman is a founding member of the international artists collective Manifest.AR and he has produced work and exhibited around the world including in London, Mexico City, Calgary, Havana, Kaliningrad, Warsaw, Zurich, Belfast, Venice, Istanbul, Copenhagen, Milano, Sydney, Singapore, Liverpool, Coimbra, Basel, Paris, across America as well as Beijing, Xi'an, Singapore and Hong Kong. In 2016 he traveled to Wuhan China as part of the ZERO1 American Arts Incubator. In 2015, he was the recipient of a commission from the LACMA’s Art+Technology Lab. He has also had work commissioned by Rhizome.org and Turbulence.org and he was awarded one of the last Individual Artist Fellowships by the NEA in 1992. His work has been reviewed in The New York Times, El Pais, Liberation, Wired News, Artforum, Ten-8, Z Magazine, Afterimage, Photo Metro, New Art Examiner, Time, Harper's and Der Spiegel. Christiane Paul cites Freeman's work in her book Digital Art, as does Lucy Lippard in the Lure of the Local, and Margot Lovejoy in Digital Currents: Art in the Electronic Age. -
Rosa Luxemburg and the Global Violence of Capitalism
Socialist Studies / Études socialistes 6(2) Fall 2010: 160-172 Copyright © 2010 The Author(s) SPECIAL SECTION ON ROSA LUXEMBURG’S POLITICAL ECONOMY Rosa Luxemburg and the Global Violence of Capitalism PAUL LE BLANC Department of History and Political Science, LaRoche College. Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States Abstract: Rosa Luxemburg’s pungent honesty is evident in her critical-minded and ‘unorthodox’ analysis of the economic expansionism of imperialism that arose out of the accumulation of capital. Despite an idiosyncratic reading and critique of Marx’s Capital, she sought to defend and advance the revolutionary perspectives of classical Marxism. Criticisms and counterpoised analyses offered by Rosdolsky, Bukharin, Lenin, and Robinson have not diminished what are generally seen as brilliant contributions. Militarism, war, and inhumanity are perceived as essential to imperialism in her analyses, and imperialism is seen as central to the nature of capitalism. Luxemburg’s account of global economic development reflect impressive economic insight, historical sweep, and anthropological sensitivity that impress critics as well partisans. Résumé : Le franc parler de Rosa Luxemburg est évident dans ses analyses critiques et ‘hétérodoxes’ de l’expansionnisme économique de l’impérialisme qui a émergé de l’accumulation du capital. Malgré une lecture idiosyncratique et critique du Capital de Marx, elle cherchait à défendre et à avancer les perspectives révolutionnaires du marxisme classique. Les critiques et contre-analyses offertes par Rosdolsky, Boukharine, Lénine et Robinson n’ont pas diminué des contributions communément admises comme brillantes. Dans ses analyses, le militarisme, la guerre et l’inhumanité sont perçues comme essentiels à l’impérialisme et l’impérialisme occupe une place centrale dans la nature du capitalisme. -
PRABA PILAR, Ph.D. CURRICULUM VITAE EDUCATION
PRABA PILAR, Ph.D. CURRICULUM VITAE EDUCATION 2014 Ph.D. Performance Studies. University of California, Davis. Designated Emphases in Studies in Performance Practice as Research and in Feminist Theory and Research. Dissertation: Latin@s Byte Back: Contestational Performance in the Technosphere. 2006 B.A. with Honors, Intermedia Arts, Mills College, Oakland, California. ADDITIONAL NEW MEDIA EDUCATION 2015 DIY Technology Design and Creation Mini-Course. Andrew Milne. Video Pool, Winnipeg. 2014 Physical Computing with the Arduino. Ken Gregory. Video Pool, Winnipeg. Wet Lab Biotechnology Workshop. Niki Sperou. Video Pool, Winnipeg. 2007 10-week class on MAX MSP/Jitter programming. Bob Ostertag, California. 2006 Basic Robotics. Elise Baldwin, Oakland, California 2006 From Machine Language to Today: Programming Workshop. Almuzeda. Oakland, California 2004 Zapped! RFID tag creation workshop. Beatriz da Costa, Jamie Schulte and Brooke Singer. New Langton Arts, San Francisco, California 1995-2010 Numerous in digital video, digital audio and web applications. PROFESSIONAL EMPLOYMENT Workshop Leader 2018 Temporary Utopias in the Extractocene. Workshop within La Pocha Nostra Summer School: The City in Ruins, SOMArts, San Francisco. 2017 A Pluriversal Approach to Practice. University of San Francisco. For Cesar Chavez Activism Week: Arte, Accion y Activismo. 2017 Tech Safety for Activists and Community: A Free Viral Workshop. KALA Art Institute, Berkeley; California Institute for Integral Studies, San Francisco; UC Davis, Davis. 2016 Decolonizing Academic and Aesthetic Practices Workshop. University of California at Davis. For the ‘Unsettling Performance’ group of the Performance Studies Doctoral Program. 2015-16 Mapping Myself: Decolonizing Art Practices. Program design, curriculum design, and teaching Through 2-dimensional, digital and storytelling media. -
Elizabeth A. Gunderson, Ph.D
Elizabeth A. Gunderson, Ph.D. Temple University, Weiss Hall [email protected] 1701 N. 13th St. phone: (215) 204-1258 Philadelphia, PA 19122 http://sites.temple.edu/cognitionlearning/ EDUCATION Doctor of Philosophy, Developmental Psychology, University of Chicago 2012 Chicago, IL Dissertation: Individual differences in early number knowledge: Variation in the learner and the learning environment Bachelor of Arts, Computer Science & Psychology, Yale University 2005 New Haven, CT Honors: Magna Cum Laude, Phi Beta Kappa FACULTY POSITIONS Assistant Professor (tenure track), Department of Psychology 2013-present Temple University, Philadelphia, PA RESEARCH POSITIONS Postdoctoral Scholar, Department of Psychology, University of Chicago 2012 Chicago, IL, Laboratory of Dr. Susan Levine Graduate Student, Department of Psychology, University of Chicago 2007-2012 Chicago, IL, Laboratory of Dr. Susan Levine Research Assistant, Yale University Social Robotics Lab, Yale University 2004-2005 New Haven, CT, Laboratory of Dr. Brian Scassellati Research Assistant, Yale University Primate Cognition Lab, Yale University 2003 New Haven, CT, Laboratory of Dr. Laurie Santos EXTERNALLY FUNDED: ONGOING GRANTS NSF CAREER Award, DRL-1452000, Sole PI: Gunderson 2015-2020 CAREER: Spatial Foundations of Symbolic Numeracy Skills in Young Children Total Costs: $1,227,559 PENDING GRANTS NSF ECR, 1760144, PI: Gunderson Submitted Sept. 2017 Co-Is: Hindman, Newcombe, Newton, Weinraub Developing STEM achievement and motivation: The role of spatial skills and parent-child -
Native Americans in Brooklyn Primary Source Packet
NATIVE AMERICANS IN BROOKLYN PRIMARY SOURCE PACKET Student Name INTRODUCTORY READING The people encountered by the Europeans in the 1600s called themselves the Lenape, which loosely translates as either “the common people” or “the ancient people.” They called their homeland Lenapehoking and their communities reached from the Lower Hudson region to the Delaware Bay, including portions of New York, New Jersey, Pennsylvania and Delaware. To other tribes in the region, they were known as “grandfather” because of their ancient roots in the region. In the early 1600s, at the time of European contact, their population was around 20,000, divided into roughly twenty autonomous groups, closely interconnected through clan membership, Turkey, Wolf, or Turtle, which was traced through the mother. The Canarsee and Marechkawieck of the Lenape tribe lived in what is now Brooklyn. Clan lands and dwellings were “owned,” or held in trust for the clan, by the women as heads of households. The concept of shared land use was fundamental to their society – and utterly foreign to the European system of land ownership and leasing. The rise of the European system in North America would prove devastating to the Lenape, whose communal identity was rooted in a land of fluid natural boundaries. When the Dutch arrived in the 17th century in what is now New York City, their encounters with the Lenape were, at first, mostly amicable, according to historical records. They shared the land and traded guns, beads and wool for beaver furs. As the myth goes, the Dutch even “purchased” Manahatta island from the Lenape in 1626. -
Testing the Models of Transition in Practice: the Case-Studies of Estonia and Slovenia Testando Os Modelos De Transição Na Prática: Os Casos Da Estônia E Da Eslovênia
Brazilian Journal of Political Economy, vol . 36, nº 2 (143), pp . 389-409, April-June/2016 Testing the models of transition in practice: the case-studies of Estonia and Slovenia Testando os modelos de transição na prática: os casos da Estônia e da Eslovênia VILJAR VEEBEL ANDRA NAMM* RESUMO: O presente estudo baseia-se na comparação dos verdadeiros processos de transição na Estônia e na Eslovênia, em 1991-2000, com o objetivo de testar dois modelos conceituais (terapia de choque versus gradualismo) da teoria da transição na prática. Este artigo tem dois objetivos principais, estreitamente interligados. A primeira tarefa é analisar se os caminhos de reforma adotados pela Estônia e pela Eslovênia seguiram os conceitos teóricos da “terapia de choque” e “gradualismo”, os modelos dos estados muitas vezes simbolizados em debates teóricos. A segunda tarefa é avaliar a capacidade dos modelos teóricos para alocar corretamente os exemplos clássicos de países para modelos de terapia de choque e gradualistas. Esta pesquisa procura mostrar quais são as vantagens e as desvantagens de uma abordagem polarizada para modelos de teoria de transição e como esses modelos podem ser melhorados. Palavras-chave: Estônia; Eslovênia; modelos de transição. abstract: The following study is based on the comparison of the actual transition processes in Estonia and Slovenia in 1991-2000 with the aim of testing two conceptual models (shock therapy versus gradualism) of transition theory in practice. This article has two main goals, closely interlinked with each other. The first task is to analyse whether the reform paths undertaken by Estonia and Slovenia followed the theoretical concepts of ‘shock therapy’ and ‘gradualism’, the models the states are often symbolising in theoretical debates. -
Sustainability
Queens Museum 2018 SUSTAINABILITY Open Engagement Table of Contents A note about this program: This document, just like the conference itself, is a Front and back cover: 4 Director’s Welcome Jökulsárlón Glacial Lagoon, Iceland, 2017 labor of love split between a tiny part-time staff and a Program Design: 5 Acknowledgments few interns. Please be kind and gentle with us if Lauren Meranda, Andrés Alejandro Chavez, 6 Curatorial Statement you see an error, omission, typo, or any other human Kate Heard mistake while reading this document. 7 OE 2018 Team 8 Locations Social Media 10 Queens Info Follow us on Instagram, Twitter and Facebook Schedule @openengagement 12 Overviews Share your posts from this year with #OE2018 18 Featured Presentations #OpenEngagement 19 Pre-Conference Find further details at 20 Open House www.openengagement.info 23 Saturday Parallel Sessions 26 Conversational Dinners OEHQ 28 Sunday Parallel Sessions OEHQ (information and registration) is our conference 31 Parties & Projects hub! OEHQ is the place for the most up-to-date 33 Open Platform information about the conference throughout the weekend, including any schedule or location changes. 36 Trainings Bronx Museum of the Arts Friday, May 11th: 6:00pm - 7:30pm 37 Featured Presenters 38 Contributor Bios Werwaiss Family Gallery, 2nd Floor, Queens Museum Saturday, May 12th: 9:00am – 5:00pm 42 Schedule at a Glance Sunday, May 13th: 9:00am – 4:00pm 2 3 Director’s Welcome Acknowledgements It is 6:12am and I have been in bed thinking about writing this I wish I could talk to Ted about where we are now. -
“Utterly Essential” the NEW YORK TIMES DIGITAL
Utterly“ essential” THE NEW YORK TIMES 1 Digital World Premiere 1 World Premiere Sonic Experience 1 World Premiere In-Person Installation 3 Digital U.S. Premieres DIGITAL PROGRAM PROTOTYPEFESTIVAL.ORG SCROLL TO CONTINUE TABLE OF CONTENTS Click on any section below to jump to the page. LAND ACKNOWLEDGEMENT TITLE PAGE ARTIST STATEMENT FESTIVAL LINEUP ARTIST INFORMATION ABOUT PROTOTYPE STAFF MEMBERSHIP SUPPORT FOLLOW US ACKNOWLEDGEMENT PROTOTYPE pays respect to the Munsee Lenape ancestors past, present, and future. We acknowledge that the work of PROTOTYPE is situated on the Lenape island of Manhattan (Mannahatta) and more broadly in Lenapehoking, the Lenape homeland. The performers and artistic team of Times3 (Times x Times x Times) are located in many different locations in this country. We acknowledge that this work is situated in various native homelands including those of the Kizh, Mohican, Munsee Lenape, and Tongva. Inspired by the words of Adrienne Wong: PROTOTYPE acknowledges the legacy of colonization embedded within the technology, structures, and ways of thinking we use every day. This production is using equipment and high-speed internet, not available in many Indigenous communities. Even the technologies that are central to much of the art we make leave significant carbon footprints, contributing to changing climates that disproportionately affect Indigenous people worldwide. We invite you to join us in acknowledging all this, as well as our shared responsibility to make good of this time and for each of us to consider our roles -
Big-Bang Versus Gradualism?
Big-bang versus Gradualism? Towards a Framework for Understanding Institutional Change in Central ∗ and Eastern Europe ∗∗ Alexander Lenger ***Prelimary version – please do not quote*** “Despite its victory over socialism and its important successes, capitalism has not been introduced successfully everywhere. At the beginning of the third millennium, there still remains the major challenge of bringing about prosperity and growth via well-working market institutions in the poorest (and highly populated) continents, countries, and regions in the world. By introducing capitalism in former socialist economies, the objective, one hopes, is to bring these countries, within an appropriate period of time, to levels of prosperity comparable to those of the most advanced industrialized countries” (Roland 2000: XVIII, author's emphasis). 1. Introduction The end of socialism created a unique opportunity for the people in the countries of Central and Eastern Europe to develop a better institutional framework. As a matter of fact, in many post-communist countries political freedom was followed by economic liberalization leading to democracies with market economies today. However, the transition from central planning to a free market economy was quite different in the countries. While most westernized countries in Central Eastern Europe and the Baltic States (Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Poland, Hungary, the Czech Republic, Slovakia, Slovenia and Croatia – hereafter CEE) have already realized functioning markets and joined the European Union the countries of the former Soviet Union (Russia, Belarus, Bulgaria, Albania, the Ukraine, Romania, Kazakhstan, Turkmenistan, ∗ Prepared for the spring conference “Ökonomik, Politische Ökonomie und Psychologie staatlicher Reformen in Europa“, 10.-11. April 2008, Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg.