DOCSLIB.ORG

Paul Davies; Oxford University Press 2006)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Paul Davies; Oxford University Press 2006) Curriculum Vitae Paul C.W. Davies Beyond: Center for Fundamental Concepts in Science Arizona State University http://beyond.asu.edu P.O. Box 871504, Tempe, AZ 85287-1504 (480) 727-0774 Fax: 480 965 7954 [email protected] Nationality: British & Australian Education/degrees BSc First Class in Physics, University College London, 1967 Ph.D, Physics Department, University College London, 1970 DSc honoris causa, Macquarie University, Sydney (2006) DSc honoris causa,, Chapman University, California (2009) Professional Appointments 2006- Director, Beyond: Center for Fundamental Concepts in Science, Co-Director ASU Cosmology Initiative, College Professor, Arizona State University 2001 - 2006 Professor of Natural Philosophy, Macquarie University 1998 - Visiting Professor, Department of Physics, Imperial College London 1998 - Adjunct Professor, Department of Physics, University of Queensland 1993 - 1997 Professor of Natural Philosophy, Department of Physics, The University of Adelaide 1990 - 1993 Professor of Mathematical Physics, The University of Adelaide 1980 - 1990 Professor of Theoretical Physics, University of Newcastle upon Tyne 1972 - 1980 Lecturer in Mathematics, King's College, University of London 1970 - 1972 Research Fellow, Institute of Theoretical Astronomy, University of Cambridge Professional organizations Fellow, UK Institute of Physics Chartered Physicist (CPhys), UK Institute of Physics Fellow, Australian Institute of Physics Fellow, World Economic Forum Fellow, Royal Literary Society Honorary Fellow, Indian Astronomical Society Honorary Fellow of the Singapore Institute of Physics Corresponding Member, International Academy of Astronautics Member, New York Academy of Sciences Member, Foundational Questions Institute Member, International Association of Mathematical Physics Member, Australasian Society for General Relativity and Gravitation Member, International Society for Science and Religion Member, Royal Society of New South Wales Member, American Physical Association Boards and committees Current Origins Initiative Advisory Board, Arizona State University Board of Advisors, Search Magazine New York Festival of Science Planning Committee International Advisory Board, Blue Brain Project SETI Post-Detection Committee, International Academy of Astronautics Board of Advisors. Cosmos Magazine Board of Trustees, John Templeton Foundation (USA) Board of Trustees, Templeton Foundation Press Board of Advisors, John Templeton Foundation (USA) Member, Grants and Programs Committee, Templeton World Charity Foundation Board of Trustees, Templeton World Charity Foundation Board of Advisors, Adelaide Festival of Ideas (Australia) Board of Editors, Astrobiology journal (USA) Patron, The Gravity Discovery Centre, Western Australia Past SPIE BioMEMS and Nanotechnology III (AU02), Committee Member, 4-7 December 2007, Canberra, Australia Board of advisors, Australian Centre for Astrobiology Advisory Committee, Charles Townes 90th birthday symposium, Berkeley, California Organizing Committee, Astrobiology Science Conference 2004 Editorial Board, Journal of Physics A (UK) Board of Governors, Dame Allan's Schools (UK) External Examining Board in Mathematics, University of Wales, Cardiff (UK) Board of Advisors, Eureka Prize (Australia) Board of Advisors, The Australia Prize Patron, The Investigator Centre, Adelaide (Australia) Festival of Arts Committee, Adelaide (Australia) South Australian Arts Task Group Board of Judges, The Templeton Prize World Advisory Panel, Bristol 2000 Science Centre (UK) Scientific advisory consultant, Nature (UK) Editorial consultant, Harvester Publishers (UK) Science Editorial Consultant, Addison - Wesley Publishers (USA & UK) Consultant and Science series editor, Allen & Unwin Publishers (Australia ) Board of Judges, Saatchi & Saatchi Award for Innovation, 2000 Advisor to numerous local, state and national governments on science policy matters. Awards and honors DSc honoris causa,, Chapman University, California (2009) Member of the Order of Australia (2007) DSc honoris causa, Macquarie University, Sydney (2006) Trotter Prize, Texas A & M University (2004) Wilbur Award for religious-themed media, USA (2004) Most Beautiful Export Award, Australia (2003) J.K. Russell Fellowship, CTNS, Berkeley (2003) American Institute of Physics Science Writing Award (2003) Michael Faraday Award, The Royal Society (2002) Nomination, Australian of the Year (2002) Kelvin Medal and Prize, Institute of Physics, UK (2001) The Templeton Prize for Progress in Religion (1995) Templeton - CTNS Book Prize (1995) Advance Australia Award for outstanding contributions to science (1993) Eureka Prize for the Promotion of Science (Australia) (1992) Eureka Book Prize (Australia) (1991) Glaxo Science Writers Fellowship (UK) (1983) Asteroid 1992 OG renamed (6870) Pauldavies Administration Head of Department of Theoretical Physics, University of Newcastle upon Tyne (1980 - 1990) Deputy Head, School of Physics, University of Newcastle upon Tyne (1993 - 1990) Served on numerous planning committees, conference organizing committees and university appointment, promotions, fellowship committees and examining boards; Newcastle University Honorary Degrees Committee and Faculty of Science Spending Authority; Chair of Student - Staff Consultancy Committee (Newcastle); University of Adelaide (1990 - 1997) served on numerous university and departmental committees; Board of Advisors, Australian Centre for Astrobiology. Director, The Beyond center for Fundamental Concepts in Science, Arizona State University Co-Director, Cosmology Initiative, Arizona State University Teaching experience Small group tutorial work for Peterhouse College Cambridge and the Cambridge campus of the Open University, UK. Developed and delivered numerous undergraduate and graduate lecture courses in physics, mathematics and astronomy at the universities of London, Newcastle upon Tyne and Adelaide, including quantum mechanics, quantum field theory, thermodynamics, electromagnetic theory, classical mechanics, general relativity, cosmology, elementary particle physics, group theory and differential geometry. Wide experience in curriculum development (including devising and introducing new degree subjects), student selection procedures, student assessment, and examining. Thesis supervisor for over 20 PhD and MSc students in UK and Australia. Guest lecturer at hundreds of schools, colleges, polytechnics, universities, government laboratories and academic societies in many countries. Devised and presented, or contributed to, numerous television and radio teaching modules for the Open University, UK. Authored or co- authored several undergraduate and graduate teaching textbooks. Current postgraduate students: Carol Oliver, PhD student Kyle Scanlon, graduate student Public outreach and media work Books About twenty books written for the general public on a range of scientific and philosophical topics, translated into more than 20 languages. Several titles have been awarded or nominated for prizes. Most books available in Penguin or Touchstone paperback editions. One work of fiction. Television Devised and presented a one-hour science documentary for BBC 4, „The Cradle of Life.‟ (2002) Devised and presented two six-part science and philosophy series for Australian SBS Channel, „The Big Questions‟ (1995) and „More Big Questions‟ (1998). These programs also appeared in edited book form. Devised and presented a series of science items for Channel 10 news (Australia). The principal subject of several UK and Australian documentaries, including „Equinox‟, „Compass‟ and „Catalyst‟, and several mainstream current affairs programs including „Newsnight With Paxman‟ (UK) and „Lateline‟ (Australia). Contributed to hundreds of studio discussions, prime time news reports, current affairs programs and science documentaries in the UK, USA, Australia, Japan, Holland, Sweden and Italy, Radio Devised, co-produced and presented a series of 45 minute physics and cosmology documentaries for BBC Radio 3, and a series of 30 minute documentaries for the BBC World Service. Devised, co-produced and presented a four-part series for BBC Radio 4 and ABC Radio National on the origin of life. Devised and presented a 50 minute documentary on Einstein for Radio National. Regularly contributed to science, news and current affairs programs in several countries over a period of 30 years, including „Science Friday‟ (USA), „Start the Week‟ (UK) and „Late Night Live‟ (Australia). Newspapers and magazines Long time News and Views writer for Nature. Long time columnist for The Economist. Long time columnist for The Australian Higher Education Supplement. Opinion columnist for two years for The Advertiser (Australia). Long time frequent contributor to The Sciences (USA) and the following European science magazines: PM (Germany), Conocer (Spain), l‘Astronomia (Italy). Continuing regular contributor to The Guardian (UK), The Times (UK) and New Scientist over a thirty year period, and in Australia The Bulletin, The Age, The Sydney Morning Herald and The Australian. Occasional contributor to The Atlantic Monthly, The New York Times, The Wall Street Journal, Time Magazine, Forbes Magazine, Scientific American, The Sunday Times (UK), The Daily Telegraph (UK), Times Higher Education Supplement (UK), The Daily Mail (UK), The Daily Express (UK), Prospect (UK), Focus (UK), Discovery (UK), Physics World (UK), The Daily Telegraph (Australia), The West Australian and several European newspapers and magazines. Public lecturing Frequent lectures
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Divine Action and the World of Science: What Cosmology and Quantum Physics Teach Us About the Role of Providence in Nature 247 Bruce L
    Journal of Biblical and Theological Studies JBTSVOLUME 2 | ISSUE 2 Christianity and the Philosophy of Science Divine Action and the World of Science: What Cosmology and Quantum Physics Teach Us about the Role of Providence in Nature 247 Bruce L. Gordon [JBTS 2.2 (2017): 247-298] Divine Action and the World of Science: What Cosmology and Quantum Physics Teach Us about the Role of Providence in Nature1 BRUCE L. GORDON Bruce L. Gordon is Associate Professor of the History and Philosophy of Science at Houston Baptist University and a Senior Fellow of Discovery Institute’s Center for Science and Culture Abstract: Modern science has revealed a world far more exotic and wonder- provoking than our wildest imaginings could have anticipated. It is the purpose of this essay to introduce the reader to the empirical discoveries and scientific concepts that limn our understanding of how reality is structured and interconnected—from the incomprehensibly large to the inconceivably small—and to draw out the metaphysical implications of this picture. What is unveiled is a universe in which Mind plays an indispensable role: from the uncanny life-giving precision inscribed in its initial conditions, mathematical regularities, and natural constants in the distant past, to its material insubstantiality and absolute dependence on transcendent causation for causal closure and phenomenological coherence in the present, the reality we inhabit is one in which divine action is before all things, in all things, and constitutes the very basis on which all things hold together (Colossians 1:17). §1. Introduction: The Intelligible Cosmos For science to be possible there has to be order present in nature and it has to be discoverable by the human mind.
    [Show full text]
  • And Abiogenesis
    Historical Development of the Distinction between Bio- and Abiogenesis. Robert B. Sheldon NASA/MSFC/NSSTC, 320 Sparkman Dr, Huntsville, AL, USA ABSTRACT Early greek philosophers laid the philosophical foundations of the distinction between bio and abiogenesis, when they debated organic and non-organic explanations for natural phenomena. Plato and Aristotle gave organic, or purpose-driven explanations for physical phenomena, whereas the materialist school of Democritus and Epicurus gave non-organic, or materialist explanations. These competing schools have alternated in popularity through history, with the present era dominated by epicurean schools of thought. Present controversies concerning evidence for exobiology and biogenesis have many aspects which reflect this millennial debate. Therefore this paper traces a selected history of this debate with some modern, 20th century developments due to quantum mechanics. It ¯nishes with an application of quantum information theory to several exobiology debates. Keywords: Biogenesis, Abiogenesis, Aristotle, Epicurus, Materialism, Information Theory 1. INTRODUCTION & ANCIENT HISTORY 1.1. Plato and Aristotle Both Plato and Aristotle believed that purpose was an essential ingredient in any scienti¯c explanation, or teleology in philosophical nomenclature. Therefore all explanations, said Aristotle, answer four basic questions: what is it made of, what does it represent, who made it, and why was it made, which have the nomenclature material, formal, e±cient and ¯nal causes.1 This aristotelean framework shaped the terms of the scienti¯c enquiry, invisibly directing greek science for over 500 years. For example, \organic" or \¯nal" causes were often deemed su±cient to explain natural phenomena, so that a rock fell when released from rest because it \desired" its own kind, the earth, over unlike elements such as air, water or ¯re.
    [Show full text]
  • Modeling the Dynamics of Single-Bubble Sonoluminescence
    Modeling the dynamics of single-bubble sonoluminescence Lucas L. Vignoli‡, Ana L. F. de Barros§, Roberto C. A. Thom´ek, A. L. M. A. Nogueira¶, Ricardo C. Paschoal+, and Hil´ario A. Rodrigues∗ Centro Federal de Educa¸c˜ao Tecnol´ogica Celso Suckow da Fonseca – CEFET/RJ Departamento de F´ısica – DEPES Av. Maracan˜a229, 20271-110, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil Abstract. Sonoluminescence (SL) is the phenomenon in which acoustic energy is (partially) transformed into light. It may occur by means of many or just one bubble of gas inside a liquid medium, giving rise to the terms multi-bubble- and single-bubble sonoluminescence (MBSL and SBSL). In the last years some models have been proposed to explain this phenomenon, but there is still no complete theory for the light emission mechanism (especially in the case of SBSL). In this work, we will not address this more complicated particular issue, but only present a simple model describing the dynamical behaviour of the sonoluminescent bubble, in the SBSL case. Using simple numerical techniques within the software Matlab, we discuss solutions considering various possibilities for some of the parameters involved: liquid compressibility, superficial tension, viscosity, and type of gas. The model may be used as an introductory study of sonoluminescence in physics courses at undergraduate or graduate levels, as well as a quite clarifying example of a physical system exhibiting large nonlinearity. arXiv:1407.5531v1 [physics.ed-ph] 18 Jul 2014 ‡ E-mail: [email protected] § E-mail: [email protected] k E-mail: [email protected] ¶ E-mail: [email protected] + E-mail: [email protected] ∗ E-mail: [email protected] Single bubble sonoluminescence 2 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Kenosis and Nature
    from John Polkinghorne, ed., The Work of Love: Creation as Kenosis. Grand Rapids, MI: Wm. Eeerdmans Publishing Co., and London: SPCK, 2001, pp. 43-65. Kenosis and Nature HOLMES ROLSTON, III Every commonplace detail of nature, every stone and tree, includes an immense richness and variety of lesser detail: in every fragment of it a thousand million lesser fragments cohere and interact. Loves Endeavour, Love's Expense, p. 84 Unless a grain of wheat falls into the earth and dies, it remains alone; but if it dies, it bears much fruit. John 12:24 1. Selfish Genes, Selfish Organisms, and Survival of the Fittest If one compares the general worldview of biology with that of theology, it first seems that there is only stark contrast. To move from Darwinian na- ture to Christian theology, one will have to change the sign of natural his- tory, from selfish genes to suffering love. Theologians also hold that, in regeneration, humans with their sinful natures must be reformed to lives that are more altruistic, also requiring a change of sign. But the problem lies deeper; all of biological nature can seem to run counter to what Jesus teaches: that one ought to lay down one s life for others. In nature, there is no altruism, much less kenosis. 43 HOLMES ROLSTON, III Life, coded by the genes, is always encapsulated in particular organ- isms. In biology we find, at once and pervasively, the organism as a bounded somatic "self" — something quite unknown in physics, chemis- try, astronomy, meteorology, or geology. The general Darwinian interpre- tive framework moves from the coding genes to the coping organisms and sees organisms so constituted genetically that self-interested (typically la- beled "selfish") behavior is inevitable.
    [Show full text]
  • Fine-Tuning, Complexity, and Life in the Multiverse*
    Fine-Tuning, Complexity, and Life in the Multiverse* Mario Livio Dept. of Physics and Astronomy, University of Nevada, Las Vegas, NV 89154, USA E-mail: [email protected] and Martin J. Rees Institute of Astronomy, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB3 0HA, UK E-mail: [email protected] Abstract The physical processes that determine the properties of our everyday world, and of the wider cosmos, are determined by some key numbers: the ‘constants’ of micro-physics and the parameters that describe the expanding universe in which we have emerged. We identify various steps in the emergence of stars, planets and life that are dependent on these fundamental numbers, and explore how these steps might have been changed — or completely prevented — if the numbers were different. We then outline some cosmological models where physical reality is vastly more extensive than the ‘universe’ that astronomers observe (perhaps even involving many ‘big bangs’) — which could perhaps encompass domains governed by different physics. Although the concept of a multiverse is still speculative, we argue that attempts to determine whether it exists constitute a genuinely scientific endeavor. If we indeed inhabit a multiverse, then we may have to accept that there can be no explanation other than anthropic reasoning for some features our world. _______________________ *Chapter for the book Consolidation of Fine Tuning 1 Introduction At their fundamental level, phenomena in our universe can be described by certain laws—the so-called “laws of nature” — and by the values of some three dozen parameters (e.g., [1]). Those parameters specify such physical quantities as the coupling constants of the weak and strong interactions in the Standard Model of particle physics, and the dark energy density, the baryon mass per photon, and the spatial curvature in cosmology.
    [Show full text]
  • Developments in Parrondo's Paradox (Derek Abbott)
    Developments in Parrondo’s Paradox Derek Abbott Abstract Parrondo’s paradox is the well-known counterintuitive situation where individually losing strategies or deleterious effects can combine to win. In 1996, Parrondo’s games were devised illustrating this effect for the first time in a sim- ple coin tossing scenario. It turns out that, by analogy, Parrondo’s original games are a discrete-time, discrete-space version of a flashing Brownian ratchet—this was later formally proven via discretization of the Fokker-Planck equation. Over the past ten years, a number of authors have pointed to the generality of Parrondian be- havior, and many examples ranging from physics to population genetics have been reported. In its most general form, Parrondo’s paradox can occur where there is a nonlinear interaction of random behavior with an asymmetry, and can be mathe- matically understood in terms of a convex linear combination. Many effects, where randomness plays a constructive role, such as stochastic resonance, volatility pump- ing, the Brazil nut paradox etc., can all be viewed as being in the class of Parrondian phenomena. We will briefly review the history of Parrondo’s paradox, its recent developments, and its connection to related phenomena. In particular, we will re- view in detail a new form of Parrondo’s paradox: the Allison mixture—this is where random sequences with zero autocorrelation can be randomly mixed, paradoxically producing a sequence with non-zero autocorrelation. The equations for the autocor- relation have been previously analytically derived, but, for the first time, we will now give a complete physical picture that explains this phenomenon where random mixing counterintuitively reduces randomness.
    [Show full text]
  • The Arrow of Time Volume 7 Paul Davies Summer 2014 Beyond Center for Fundamental Concepts in Science, Arizona State University, Journal Homepage P.O
    The arrow of time Volume 7 Paul Davies Summer 2014 Beyond Center for Fundamental Concepts in Science, Arizona State University, journal homepage P.O. Box 871504, Tempe, AZ 852871504, USA. www.euresisjournal.org [email protected] Abstract The arrow of time is often conflated with the popular but hopelessly muddled concept of the “flow” or \passage" of time. I argue that the latter is at best an illusion with its roots in neuroscience, at worst a meaningless concept. However, what is beyond dispute is that physical states of the universe evolve in time with an objective and readily-observable directionality. The ultimate origin of this asymmetry in time, which is most famously captured by the second law of thermodynamics and the irreversible rise of entropy, rests with cosmology and the state of the universe at its origin. I trace the various physical processes that contribute to the growth of entropy, and conclude that gravitation holds the key to providing a comprehensive explanation of the elusive arrow. 1. Time's arrow versus the flow of time The subject of time's arrow is bedeviled by ambiguous or poor terminology and the con- flation of concepts. Therefore I shall begin my essay by carefully defining terms. First an uncontentious statement: the states of the physical universe are observed to be distributed asymmetrically with respect to the time dimension (see, for example, Refs. [1, 2, 3, 4]). A simple example is provided by an earthquake: the ground shakes and buildings fall down. We would not expect to see the reverse sequence, in which shaking ground results in the assembly of a building from a heap of rubble.
    [Show full text]
  • Science and Belief: the Big Issues Biblical Inspiration from the Time of the Council of Trent (1540’S) to Vatican II in 1962 Are Also Briefly Stannard, R
    Reflections, Impressions & Experiences Changes in the Roman Catholic understanding of Science and belief: The big issues biblical inspiration from the time of the Council of Trent (1540’s) to Vatican II in 1962 are also briefly Stannard, R. (2012). Lion Hudson, Oxford. outlined. The point of this chapter is to show, in the author’s opinion, that Genesis and Evolution are not on a collision course if properly understood. Kevin de Berg The Intelligent Design (ID) chapter amounts largely to a discussion of the arguments for and Associate Professor, School of Science and against evolution. While suggesting that ID is Mathematics, Avondale College of Higher Education, Cooranbong, NSW essentially a “God of the Gaps” type of argument, Stannard claims that, “ID is at least a step on the way towards acknowledging that evolution has The subject of this book originally appeared taken place”. While some ID adherents might as a twelve-episode series for the BBC. The agree, others would disagree with this statement. author, Russell Stannard, is a physicist and Some common misconceptions of evolution such licensed lay minister in the Church of England as the wholly unpredictable nature of evolution who, although finding no conflict between are discussed in terms of the emergence of science and belief himself, allows the reader complexity by a process known as ‘convergence’ to make up their own mind after a stimulating which seems to be endemic to evolution. The discussion of the questions raised. author acknowledges the basic unfairness associated with evolutionary process, but also There are eight major issues raised in the book— recognises that “the deep mystery of premature that relating to Genesis and Evolution, Intelligent death, and indeed the other manifestations of Design, Morality, Creation, Anthropic Principle, life being unfair, has always been with us”.
    [Show full text]
  • Negotiating Uncertainty: Asteroids, Risk and the Media Felicity Mellor
    Accepted pre-publication version Published at: Public Understanding of Science 19(1): (2010) 16-33. Negotiating Uncertainty: Asteroids, Risk and the Media Felicity Mellor ABSTRACT Natural scientists often appear in the news media as key actors in the management of risk. This paper examines the way in which a small group of astronomers and planetary scientists have constructed asteroids as risky objects and have attempted to control the media representation of the issue. It shows how scientists negotiate the uncertainties inherent in claims about distant objects and future events by drawing on quantitative risk assessments even when these are inapplicable or misleading. Although the asteroid scientists worry that media coverage undermines their authority, journalists typically accept the scientists’ framing of the issue. The asteroid impact threat reveals the implicit assumptions which can shape natural scientists’ public discourse and the tensions which arise when scientists’ quantitative uncertainty claims are re-presented in the news media. Keywords: asteroids, impact threat, astronomy, risk, uncertainty, science journalism, media, science news Introduction Over the past two decades, British newspapers have periodically announced the end of the world. Playful headlines such as “The End is Nigh” and “Armageddon Outta Here!” are followed a few days later by reports that there’s no danger after all: “PHEW. The end of the world has been cancelled” (Britten, 1998; Wickham, 2002; Evening Standard , 1998). These stories, and others like them appearing in news media around the world, deal with the possibility that an asteroid or comet may one day collide with the Earth causing global destruction. The threat posed by near-Earth objects (NEOs) has been actively promoted by a group of astronomers and planetary scientists since the late 1980s.
    [Show full text]
  • A Brief Look at Mathematics and Theology Philip J
    Humanistic Mathematics Network Journal Issue 27 Article 14 Winter 1-1-2004 A Brief Look at Mathematics and Theology Philip J. Davis Brown University Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarship.claremont.edu/hmnj Part of the Logic and Foundations of Mathematics Commons, Mathematics Commons, and the Religious Thought, Theology and Philosophy of Religion Commons Recommended Citation Davis, Philip J. (2004) "A Brief Look at Mathematics and Theology," Humanistic Mathematics Network Journal: Iss. 27, Article 14. Available at: http://scholarship.claremont.edu/hmnj/vol1/iss27/14 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at Claremont at Scholarship @ Claremont. It has been accepted for inclusion in Humanistic Mathematics Network Journal by an authorized administrator of Scholarship @ Claremont. For more information, please contact [email protected]. 1 A Brief Look at Mathematics and Theology Philip J. Davis "Such a really remarkable discovery. I wanted your opinion on it. You know the formula m over naught equals infinity, m being any positive number? [m/0 = ]. Well, why not reduce the equation to a simpler form by multiplying both sides by naught? In which case you have m equals infinity times naught [m = x 0]. That is to say, a positive number is the product of zero and infinity. Doesn't that demonstrate the creation of the Universe by an infinite power out of nothing? Doesn't it?" Aldous Huxley, Point Counter Point, (1928), Chapter XI. I Introduction We are living in a mathematical age. Our lives, from the personal to the communal, from the communal to the international, from the biological and physical to the economic and even to the ethical, are increasingly mathematicized.
    [Show full text]
  • Science & ROGER PENROSE
    Science & ROGER PENROSE Live Webinar - hosted by the Center for Consciousness Studies August 3 – 6, 2021 9:00 am – 12:30 pm (MST-Arizona) each day 4 Online Live Sessions DAY 1 Tuesday August 3, 2021 9:00 am to 12:30 pm MST-Arizona Overview / Black Holes SIR ROGER PENROSE (Nobel Laureate) Oxford University, UK Tuesday August 3, 2021 9:00 am – 10:30 am MST-Arizona Roger Penrose was born, August 8, 1931 in Colchester Essex UK. He earned a 1st class mathematics degree at University College London; a PhD at Cambridge UK, and became assistant lecturer, Bedford College London, Research Fellow St John’s College, Cambridge (now Honorary Fellow), a post-doc at King’s College London, NATO Fellow at Princeton, Syracuse, and Cornell Universities, USA. He also served a 1-year appointment at University of Texas, became a Reader then full Professor at Birkbeck College, London, and Rouse Ball Professor of Mathematics, Oxford University (during which he served several 1/2-year periods as Mathematics Professor at Rice University, Houston, Texas). He is now Emeritus Rouse Ball Professor, Fellow, Wadham College, Oxford (now Emeritus Fellow). He has received many awards and honorary degrees, including knighthood, Fellow of the Royal Society and of the US National Academy of Sciences, the De Morgan Medal of London Mathematical Society, the Copley Medal of the Royal Society, the Wolf Prize in mathematics (shared with Stephen Hawking), the Pomeranchuk Prize (Moscow), and one half of the 2020 Nobel Prize in Physics, the other half shared by Reinhard Genzel and Andrea Ghez.
    [Show full text]
  • CLIMATE CHANGE, DOLPHINS, SPACESHIPS and ANTIMI- CROBIAL RESISTANCE - the IMPACT of BUBBLE ACOUSTICS Timothy G
    CLIMATE CHANGE, DOLPHINS, SPACESHIPS AND ANTIMI- CROBIAL RESISTANCE - THE IMPACT OF BUBBLE ACOUSTICS Timothy G. Leighton Institute of Sound and Vibration Research, Faculty of Engineering and the Environment, University of Southampton, Highfield, Southampton SO17 1BJ, UK email: [email protected] Bubbles couple to sound fields to an extraordinary extent, generating and scattering sound, and changing the chemical, physical and biological environments around them when excited to pul- sate by an appropriate sound field. This paper accompanies a plenary lecture, opening with the way that the sound emitted by bubbles, when they are injected into the ocean by breaking waves, helps track the >1 billion tonnes of atmospheric carbon that transfers between atmosphere and ocean annually. However, compared to carbon dioxide, atmospheric methane has at least 20 times the ability, per molecule, to generate ‘greenhouse’ warming. Worldwide there is more than twice the amount of carbon trapped in the seabed in the form of methane hydrate than the amount of carbon worldwide in all other known conventional fossil fuels. Acoustics can track the release of bubbles of seabed methane as this hydrate dissociates in response to increasing ocean tempera- tures, an effect cited by some as a possible climate apocalypse. Continuing the methane theme, this paper discusses the sounds of methane/ethane ‘waterfalls’ on Titan, Saturn’s largest moon, before returning to Earth’s oceans to discuss how whales and dolphins might use the interaction between sound
    [Show full text]