Corruption and Anti-Corruption in the Justice System

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Corruption and Anti-Corruption in the Justice System CORRUPTION AND ANTI-CORRUPTION IN THE JUSTICE SYSTEM About the author: Cristi Danilet is 34 years old and has been a judge since 1998. Since 2003, he has been a member of a number of different organisations defending the independence of the justice system and promoting the integrity of judges: The Association of Magistrates of Romania (member of the Steering Committee of the Cluj branch 2003 – 2004), The Society for Justice (founding member since 2005, President since 2009), Transparency International Romania (member since 2004, elected on the Steering Committee in 2007) and The National Union of Judges of Romania (member since 2008). The author has been a member of the working group put together by the Superior Council of Magistracy in 2006 and assigned the task of preparing a ‘Profile of the Magistrate in the Romanian Legal System ’. He has co-authored the work 'Pressure factors and conflicts of interests in the justice system. A Handbook for Judges (The Society for Justice, Konrad Adenauer Stiftung, 2007). From 2005 to 2007 Cristi Danilet served as a member of the Council of Europe European Commission for the Efficiency of Justice. There, he translated the relevant recommendations of the Committee of Ministers, which were compiled into the composition ‘ Effectiveness and Fairness of Justice – European Standards ' (The Romanian Institute for Human Rights, 2008), also available on the website of the Council of Europe: www.coe.int/cepej. In March 2007 Cristi Danilet represented Romania on the meeting of experts from the UN member states who contributed to the preparation of the paper ‘ Commentary on the Bangalore Principles of Judicial Conduct’ , which represents the most important code of ethics for judges ever developed. Aspects of this study have been the subject of presentations Cristi Danilet has made during various events: the international symposium 'Professional Ethics and Culture: A Multidisciplinary Approach’, held by the Faculty of History and Philosophy of the Babes-Bolyai University in Cluj-Napoca, on the 5-6 October 2007; an extracurricular conference intended for an audience consisting of first-year students organised at the National Institute of Magistracy on the 9 October 2007; the address given at the Autumn School within the project ‘Journalists’ Network for the Defence of Human Rights ’, organised by the League for the Defence of Human Rights – the Cluj branch in partnership with the Cluj Association of Journalism Professionals, held in Baisoara, County of Cluj, on 19-20 October 2007; the address given within the training programme for journalists ‘Media and Justice – In Search of Dialogue’, organised by Freedom House Romania in Sinaia, on the 22 – 24 of February 2008. A summary presen- tation of this study was initially published by the League for the Defence of Human Rights – the Cluj branch in the 'October – December 2007 Newsletter’, to be subsequently detailed in Copoeru, Ion and Nicoleta Szabo (coordinators) comps. ‘ Etica şi cultura profesională’ (Professional Ethics and Culture), Cluj-Napoca: Editura Casa Cărţii de Ştiinţă, 2008, 218-255. In the area of judicial corruption and anti-corruption, the author received an award from the National Institute of Magistracy for his essay ‘Corruption Seen from Within’, in October 2008. He has also attended a training programme on ‘Building judicial integrity’ organised by the CEELI Institute in Prague, in November 2008. Numerous analyses on corruption, the independence of the judiciary, and the reform of the justice system can be found on the author’s blog, at http://cristidanilet.wordpress.com. Cristi Danileţ CORRUPTION AND ANTI-CORRUPTION IN THE JUSTICE SYSTEM EDITURA C.H. BECK Descrierea CIP a Bibliotecii Naţionale a României DANILEŢ, CRISTI Corruption and anti-corruption in the justice system / Cristi Danileţ. - Bucharest : Editura C.H. Beck, 2009 Bibliogr. ISBN 978-973-115-771-9 343.352 Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung e.V. Tiergartenstrase 35 D-10785 Berlin Germany Tel.: +49 30 269 96 453 Fax: +49 30 269 96 555 Website: www.kas.de Rule of Law Program South East Europe Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung e.V. 50 Plantelor Street Sector 2 RO-023975 Bucharest Romania Tel.: +40 21 323 31 26 Fax: +40 21 326 04 07 e-mail: [email protected] Website: www.kas.de/rspsoe Edited by: Dr. iur. Stefanie Ricarda Roos, Director, Rule of Law Program South East Europe Corina Rebegea, Project Coordinator, Rule of Law Program South East Europe Translation: Veronica Vasilescu This is a free-distribution publication. The Rule of Law Program South East Europe of the Konrad Adenauer Foundation declines any responsibility concerning the content of this publication. The content of this book is the sole responsibility of its author. MOTTO : ‘ Every man invested with power is apt to abuse it’ (Montesquieu) Our thanks go to Prof. Dr. Ion Copoeru from the Faculty of Philosophy of the Babes-Bolyai University of Cluj-Napoca, on whose original idea this book is based. List of Acronyms ANI – National Integrity Agency ANP – National Prison Administration CCJE – Consultative Council of European Judges ECHR – European Court of Human Rights ECEJ – European Commission for the Efficiency of Justice CoE – Council of Europe SCM – Superior Council of Magistracy DGA – Anti-corruption Directorate General DGPA – Directorate General for Anti-corruption Protection NAD – National Anti-corruption Directorate GRECO – Group of States against Corruption HCCJ – High Court of Cassation and Justice MAI – Ministry of Administration and Interior MJ – Ministry of Justice UN – United Nations Organisation SIPA – Independent Protection and Anti-corruption Service SRI – Romanian Intelligence Service TI – Transparency International TI-RO – Transparency International Romania EU – European Union UNDP – United Nations Development Programme UNODC – United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime VII Table of Contents Preface................................................................................................. XI Foreword........................................................................................... XIII Part I. GENERAL NOTIONS ON CORRUPTION .........................................1 1. The three ‘I’-s ...................................................................................... 1 2. What is corruption? .............................................................................. 2 2.1. Public opinion ................................................................................ 4 2.2. Dictionary definition ....................................................................... 4 2.3. International regulations ................................................................. 5 2.4. National regulations ....................................................................... 8 2.5. What is not corruption .................................................................... 9 3. The justice system and corruption ........................................................ 10 PART II. WEAKNESSES IN THE JUSTICE SYSTEM..................................13 1. Public confidence in the judicial system ................................................. 14 2. Judicial corruption in opinion polls......................................................... 15 3. Prosecutions and penalties for judicial corruption.................................... 17 4. Weaknesses in the justice system......................................................... 20 4.1. Types of decisions in the justice system.......................................... 21 4.2. Weaknesses in the judiciary and judicial administration .................... 23 4.3. Weaknesses in administration........................................................ 37 5. Diagnosing corruption in the justice system ........................................... 41 5.1 Causes of corruption...................................................................... 41 5.2 Forms of corruption....................................................................... 48 5.3. Vehicles of corruption ................................................................... 50 5.4. Means of corruption...................................................................... 51 5.5. The purpose of corruption ............................................................. 51 5.6. Effects of judicial corruption .......................................................... 52 5.7. Types of corruption ...................................................................... 54 PART III. STANDARDS OF JUDICIAL INTEGRITY..................................59 1. Worldwide regulations and efforts......................................................... 59 2. Council of Europe instruments ............................................................. 74 3. European Union instruments ................................................................ 82 4. Other anti-corruption and public integrity programmes............................ 85 PART IV. ANTI-CORRUPTION POLICIES IN THE JUSTICE SYSTEM........95 1. Components of anti-corruption policies ................................................ 96 2. Defining features of anti-corruption policies.......................................... 97 3. Current anti-corruption framework...................................................... 97 4. Preventing corruption in the justice system ........................................ 101 5. Combating corruption in the justice system........................................ 132 IX CONCLUSIONS....................................................................................179
Recommended publications
  • Fighting Corruption with Con Tricks: Romania's Assault On
    FIGHTING CORRUPTION WITH CON TRICKS: ROMANIA’S ASSAULT ON THE RULE OF LAW David Clark FIGHTING CORRUPTION WITH CON TRICKS FIGHTING CORRUPTION WITH CON TRICKS: ROMANIA’S ASSAULT ON THE RULE OF LAW 2 FIGHTING CORRUPTION WITH CON TRICKS Executive Summary Democracy in Europe is facing its greatest challenge since the fall of the Berlin Wall. The threat comes not only from the rise of political movements that openly reject liberal democratic values, including the governing parties of Hungary and Poland, but also from the risk of creeping authoritarianism caused by a gradual decline in standards of governance and the weakening of important democratic underpinnings, such as the rule of law. Romania is a country of particular concern. Although it has earned international praise for its recent efforts to stamp out corruption, a detailed examination of Romania’s anti-corruption activities shows that they often provide convenient cover for acts of political score settling and serious human rights violations. The methods used show a considerable degree of continuity with the practices and attitudes of the communist era. The strong correlation between those targeted for prosecution and the interests of those in power is indicative of politicised justice. Cases have often been accompanied by campaigns of public vilification designed to maximise their political impact. Far from being above politics, Romania’s National Anti-corruption Directorate (DNA) is an active participant in its partisan struggles. Although the rule of law requires the justice system to work independently of government, there is clear evidence of collusion between prosecutors and the executive in Romania.
    [Show full text]
  • Judicial Corruption in Eastern Europe: an Examination of Causal Mechanisms in Albania and Romania Claire M
    James Madison University JMU Scholarly Commons Senior Honors Projects, 2010-current Honors College Spring 2017 Judicial corruption in Eastern Europe: An examination of causal mechanisms in Albania and Romania Claire M. Swinko James Madison University Follow this and additional works at: https://commons.lib.jmu.edu/honors201019 Part of the International Relations Commons Recommended Citation Swinko, Claire M., "Judicial corruption in Eastern Europe: An examination of causal mechanisms in Albania and Romania" (2017). Senior Honors Projects, 2010-current. 334. https://commons.lib.jmu.edu/honors201019/334 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Honors College at JMU Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Senior Honors Projects, 2010-current by an authorized administrator of JMU Scholarly Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Judicial Corruption in Eastern Europe: An Examination of Causal Mechanisms in Albania and Romania _______________________ An Honors Program Project Presented to the Faculty of the Undergraduate College of Arts and Letters James Madison University _______________________ by Claire Swinko May 2017 Accepted by the faculty of the Department of Political Science, James Madison University, in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Honors Program. FACULTY COMMITTEE: HONORS PROGRAM APPROVAL: Project Advisor: John Hulsey, Ph.D., Bradley R. Newcomer, Ph.D., Associate Professor, Political Science Director, Honors Program Reader: John Scherpereel, Ph.D., Professor, Political Science Reader: Charles Blake, Ph. D., Professor, Political Science Dedication For my dad, who supports and inspires me everyday. You taught me to shoot for the stars, and I would not be half the person I am today with out you.
    [Show full text]
  • Here a Causal Relationship? Contemporary Economics, 9(1), 45–60
    Bibliography on Corruption and Anticorruption Professor Matthew C. Stephenson Harvard Law School http://www.law.harvard.edu/faculty/mstephenson/ March 2021 Aaken, A., & Voigt, S. (2011). Do individual disclosure rules for parliamentarians improve government effectiveness? Economics of Governance, 12(4), 301–324. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10101-011-0100-8 Aaronson, S. A. (2011a). Does the WTO Help Member States Clean Up? Available at SSRN 1922190. http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1922190 Aaronson, S. A. (2011b). Limited partnership: Business, government, civil society, and the public in the Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative (EITI). Public Administration and Development, 31(1), 50–63. https://doi.org/10.1002/pad.588 Aaronson, S. A., & Abouharb, M. R. (2014). Corruption, Conflicts of Interest and the WTO. In J.-B. Auby, E. Breen, & T. Perroud (Eds.), Corruption and conflicts of interest: A comparative law approach (pp. 183–197). Edward Elgar PubLtd. http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:hul.ebookbatch.GEN_batch:ELGAR01620140507 Abbas Drebee, H., & Azam Abdul-Razak, N. (2020). The Impact of Corruption on Agriculture Sector in Iraq: Econometrics Approach. IOP Conference Series. Earth and Environmental Science, 553(1), 12019-. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/553/1/012019 Abbink, K., Dasgupta, U., Gangadharan, L., & Jain, T. (2014). Letting the briber go free: An experiment on mitigating harassment bribes. JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ECONOMICS, 111(Journal Article), 17–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2013.12.012 Abbink, Klaus. (2004). Staff rotation as an anti-corruption policy: An experimental study. European Journal of Political Economy, 20(4), 887–906. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2003.10.008 Abbink, Klaus.
    [Show full text]
  • Revista Arhivei Maramureşene
    https://biblioteca-digitala.ro REVISTA ARHIVEI MARAMUREŞENE Arhivele Naţionale Maramureş la 60 de ani https://biblioteca-digitala.ro Răspunderea pentru conţinutul ştiinţific al studiilor, formulări şi calitatea rezumatelor în limbi străine revine, în exclusivitate, autorilor. Authors are responsible for the presentation of the facts contained in their articles, for the wording and for the ac- curacy of foreign languages summarie https://biblioteca-digitala.ro Revista Arhivei Maramureşene REVISTA COLEGIUL DE REDACŢIE: ARHIVEI Prof. Univ. Dr. POGANy István Univ. Warwick - U.K. MARAMUREŞENE Prof. Univ. Dr. FARAGO Tamás Univ. Corvinus Budapesta - Ungaria nr. 4//2011 Prof. Univ. Dr. Vasile VESA Univ. Babeş-Bolyai Cluj Napoca Conf. Univ. Dr. Ovidiu Ghitta Univ. Babeş-Bolyai Cluj Napoca Revistă cu apariţie anuală Conf. Univ. Dr. Ionuţ COSTEA editată de: Univ. Babeş-Bolyai Cluj Napoca ARHIVELE NAŢIONALE SERVICIUL JUDEŢEAN MARAMUREŞ REDACŢIA: Klara GUŞeth (STENCZEL) - redactor şef ASOCIAŢIA ARHIVIŞTILOR Marius UGLEA - secretar redacţie “DAVID PRODAN” Diana MUREŞAN MARAMUREŞ Amalia RACOLŢA (MOJOLIC) Robert TőkőLyI Zsolt VARGA Vasile ROGOZSAN Ana-Maria BUCIUMAN Iuliu Victor GREC Redacţia şi administraţia: SJANMM, Baia Mare B-dul Bucureşti nr. 26 Baia Mare http://arhivamm.wordpress.com ISSN 1844-9832 [email protected] [email protected] https://biblioteca-digitala.ro 4 Revista Arhivei Maramureşene CUPRINS: Drd. klara Guşeth (Stenczel) ÎN LOC DE: „ARHIVELE MARAMUREŞENE LA 60 DE ANI” ......... 11 STUDII ŞI ARTICOLE DE ISTORIE Drd. Petra Rausch-Mátyás Beiträge über die Beziehung der Zipser Kammer zur Niederösterreichischen Kammer: Ein kurzer Grundriss der Verwaltung der Bergkammer und der Münzstätten Nagybánya (Baia Mare) 1571–1613. (Studii referitoare la rapoartele Cămării din Spis şi Cămara din Austria de Jos: administrarea Cămării de mină şi a Monetăriei din Baia Mare în perioada 1571-1613) .................
    [Show full text]
  • Comunicare 16.Qxd 28.07.2009 12:03 Page 1
    Revista_comunicare_16.qxd 28.07.2009 12:03 Page 1 REVISTA ROMÂNÃ DE COMUNICARE ªI RELAÞII PUBLICE Volumul 11, nr. 2 (16) / 2009 SNSPA Facultatea de Comunicare ºi Relaþii Publice Revista_comunicare_16.qxd 28.07.2009 12:03 Page 2 Comitetul editorial Colegiul de redacþie Alina Bârgãoanu (SNSPA, România) • Camelia Beciu (SNSPA, România) • Arjen Boin (Universitatea din Leiden, Olanda) • ªtefan Bratosin (Universitatea Paul Sabatier, Franþa) • Manuela Cernat (UNATC „I.L. Caragiale“, România) • Septimiu Chelcea (Universitatea Bucureºti, România) • Cornel Codiþã (SNSPA, România) • Mihai Dinu (Universitatea Bucureºti, România) • Paul Dobrescu (SNSPA, România) • Ion Drãgan (Universitatea Bucureºti, România) • Nicolae Frigioiu (SNSPA, România) • Ana Gil Garcia (Northeastern Illinois University, SUA) • Grigore Georgiu (SNSPA, România) • Dumitru Iacob (SNSPA, România) • Luminiþa Iacob (Universitatea „Alexandru Ioan Cuza“ din Iaºi, România) • Guy Lochard (Universitatea Paris III, Franþa) • Adrian Neculau (Universitatea „Alexandru Ioan Cuza“ din Iaºi, România) • Marian Petcu (Universitatea Bucureºti, România) • Horia Pitariu (Universitatea Babeº-Bolyai, România) • Remus Pricopie (SNSPA, România) • Aurelian Mihai Stãnescu (Politehnica din Bucureºti, România) • ªtefan ªtefãnescu (Academia Românã, România) • Tudor Teoteoi (Universitatea Bucureºti, România) • George Terzis (Universitatea Liberã din Bruxelles, Belgia) • Adrian Vasilescu (BNR, România) Comitetul de referenþi ºtiinþifici Dan Banciu (Institutul de Sociologie, România) • Ilie Bãdescu (Universitatea
    [Show full text]
  • Szilveszter, Magyar Időszámítás Szerint
    2010. december 31.–2011. január 2., péntek–vasárnap www.maszol.ro új magyar szó 20 oldal VI. évfolyam, Ára: 1,5 lej Országos közéleti napilap Alapítva 1947-ben, Romániai Magyar Szó címmel 254. (1320.) szám Boldog új esztendõt kívánunk! Az újévi munkaszünet miatt következõ lapszámunk január 4-één, kedden jelenik meg. Szilveszter, magyar BNR-valutaárfolyamok 1 euró 4,2877 ▼ 1 amerikai dollár 3,2355 ▼ 100 magyar forint 1,5303 ▼ idõszámítás szerint Aktuális 2 Hodorkovszkij marad a börtönben Újabb öt és fél évre ítélte egy moszkvai bí- róság Mihail Hodorkovszkijt, a Jukosz olaj- társaság egykori tulajdonosát kõolajlopás és pénzmosás vádjával. Putyin miniszterelnök ellenlábasa korábban már nyolc évet kapott, így 2017-nél elõbb nem szabadulhat. Aktuális 3 Markó Béla kormánymérlege Ha 2011-ben nem kell újabb megszorító in- tézkedéseket hoznunk, akkor 2010-ben jól dolgoztunk – foglalta össze tegnap az egyéves kormányzás mérlegét Markó Béla miniszterelnök-helyettes. Fotó: Mediafax Fotó: Naptár 6-7 Nem csak a hazai idõszámítás szerinti „román” éjfélt, a Magyarországon érvényes idõzóna szerinti „magyar” évváltást is külön tûzijáték jelzi olyan székelyföldi városokban, ahol a köztereken is elbúcsúzhatnak 2010-tõl az illetõ települések lakói. Az önkormányzatok év végi tartalékától függ, mit kínálnak a helybélieknek szilveszterre. Sepsiszentgyörgyön háromnapos ünneppel búcsúztatják 2010-et és köszöntik 2011-et. Kolozsváron csak egy pohár pezsgõ jár az utcán ünneplõknek. 2011. január 1-jétõl egész Európa „magyar idõszámításra tér át”: szombattól Magyarország tölti be az Európai Unió soros elnöki tisztét. 2., 4. és 8. oldal X Újévi ajándék az ÚMSZ-tõl Rajtra készen a konzulátusok ÚMSZ Vezércikk 3 Felkészülten várják az állam- Harmincegy olvasónkra polgársághoz folyamodókat 2011-tõl ezt kívánjuk mosolygott a szerencse: az hétfõtõl, az új év elsõ munkanap- egyéves elõfizetõink közül teg- jától Magyarország romániai Akit egyre-másra támogatnak, az nem nap kisorsolt nyertesek az Új konzulátusai.
    [Show full text]
  • Romania RISK & COMPLIANCE REPORT DATE: March 2018
    Romania RISK & COMPLIANCE REPORT DATE: March 2018 KNOWYOURCOUNTRY.COM Executive Summary - Romania Sanctions: None FAFT list of AML No Deficient Countries Compliance with FATF 40 + 9 Recommendations Medium Risk Areas: US Dept of State Money Laundering assessment Corruption Index (Transparency International & W.G.I.)) World Governmance Indicators (Average Score) Failed States Index (Political Issues)(Average Score) Major Investment Areas: Agriculture - products: wheat, corn, barley, sugar beets, sunflower seed, potatoes, grapes; eggs, sheep Industries: electric machinery and equipment, textiles and footwear, light machinery and auto assembly, mining, timber, construction materials, metallurgy, chemicals, food processing, petroleum refining Exports - commodities: machinery and equipment, metals and metal products, textiles and footwear, chemicals, agricultural products, minerals and fuels Exports - partners: Germany 18.9%, Italy 12.3%, France 7.1%, Turkey 5.5%, Hungary 5.5% (2012) Imports - commodities: machinery and equipment, chemicals, fuels and minerals, metals, textile and products, agricultural products Imports - partners: Germany 17.5%, Italy 11%, Hungary 9.1%, France 5.7%, Russia 4.4%, Poland 4.3%, Austria 4.2%, Kazakhstan 4.1% (2012) 1 Investment Restrictions: Foreign investors may engage in business activities in Romania by any of the following methods: • Setting up new commercial companies, subsidiaries or branches, either wholly- owned or in partnership with Romanian natural or legal persons; • Participating in the increase of
    [Show full text]
  • Prosecution of Corruption”
    ACN Anti-Corruption Network for Eastern Europe and Central National Anticorruption Directorate, Asia Romania OECD Anti-Corruption Network for Eastern Europe and Central Asia EXPERT SEMINAR “EFFECTIVE MEANS OF INVESTIGATION AND PROSECUTION OF CORRUPTION” Held in Bucharest, Romania on 20 – 22 October 2010 Hosted by the National Anti-Corruption Directorate of Romania PROCEEDINGS OF THE SEMINAR These proceedings were prepared by the Secretariat of the Anti-Corruption Network for Eastern Europe and Central Asia (ACN) at the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). The OECD does not guarantee the accuracy of data included in the presentations and accept no responsibility for any consequences of their use. This document is available for download from the ACN Web site at www.oecd.org/corruption/acn Participants in the expert seminar “Effective Means of Investigation and Prosecution of Corruption”, 20 – 22 October 2010, Bucharest, Romania 2 Table of Contents INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................................. 5 SUMMARY OF DISCUSSIONS ............................................................................................................... 7 TOPIC 1 EFFECTIVE MEANS TO DETECT AND INVESTIGATE CORRUPTION CRIMES .......................... 12 MEANS OF DETECTING AND INVESTIGATING CORRUPTION OFFENCES AND JOINT INVESTIGATION TEAMS (Juuso Oilinki, Finland) ...............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • S-A Terminat Centenarul, `Ncepe Scandalul `Ntre Iohannis ;I PSD-ALDE
    I Anul XXVI Nr. 7720 MAR|I, 4 decembrie 2018 16 pagini 2,5 lei www.informatia-zilei.ro Satu Mare Au fost stinse 6 focare de pest[ 9 incendii `n preajma porcin[, dar mai r[mân 6 Centenarului Eveniment, pag. 3 Amănunte, pag. 3 România primeşte S-a terminat Centenarul, `ncepe 26,1 mld. € prin cinci fonduri structurale România primeşte de la UE 26,1 miliarde de euro prin cinci fonduri structurale< de scandalul `ntre Iohannis ;i PSD-ALDE Coeziune, de Dezvoltare Regională, Social, de Mediu şi de Dezvoltare Rurală. Pe lângă Politica de Coeziune şi cea Agricolă Comună, fondurile T[riceanu `l someaz[ pe Iohannis s[ nu t[r[g[neze numirea mini;trilor vor mai fi dirijate şi în baza Politicii de Cooperare Teritorială, în cadrul căreia vom avea Sărbătorile Centenarului s- programe operaţionale de cooperare cu Ungaria au terminat, a;adar treburile şi cu Bulgaria. Problema complexă şi birocratică este stringente din politică revin în rezolvată într-un ghid de consultanţă simplu, actualitate. concret şi complet care îţi arată exact cui te Șeful statului ar trebui să ia adresezi, cum întocmeşti dosarul, ce acte sunt o decizie cu privire la cele două necesare, unde le depui şi toţi paşii necesari în propuneri, așa cum a anunțat funcţie de tipul afacerii, regiunea şi vârsta. Un atunci când a refuzat numirea alt aspect deosebit de important rezolvat Liei Olguța Vasilescu la începând cu acest an este posibilitatea depunerii Dezvoltare și a lui Mircea proiectului, cu respectarea tuturor celor Drăghici la Transporturi. prevăzute în ghidurile de accesare de fonduri Iohannis a spus atunci că nu va nerambursabile, online.
    [Show full text]
  • The Kleptocracy – a Characteristic of Romanian Economy?
    Annals of the „Constantin Brâncuşi” University of Târgu Jiu, Economy Series, Special Issue ECO-TREND 2015 – Performance, Competitiveness, Creativity THE KLEPTOCRACY – A CHARACTERISTIC OF ROMANIAN ECONOMY? TOMESCU-DUMITRESCU CORNELIA, CONF.UNIV, UNIVERSITATEA „CONSTANTIN BRÂNCUŞI” DIN TÂRGU JIU [email protected] Abstract This paper presents the concept of kleptocratic management closely related to corruption. Considered a product of the transition to capitalist economy, modern kleptocratic management is the opposite of democratic management, strategic, aimed at rapid enrichment by any means. By analyzing Corruption Perception Index and Global Corruption Barometer kleptocratic management have highlighted the manifestation of the Romanian economy. Keywords: kleptocracy, corruption, Corruption Perception Index, Global Corruption Barometer, antimanagement, antiliders, antimanagement Classification JEL: H11, M10, O43 1. Introduction In Romania, SOEs either before 1989 or during this endless process of transition were characterized by an incompetent management with adverse consequences for the entire economy. Ioan Mihut examines this kind of management catastrophic, which appoints kleptocratic management and points out that he has developed especially in the economies of former socialist countries amid worsening and growing poverty, the outbreak of social unrest, strikes and incredible social resistance to change. Although elements of kleptocratic management in Romania have been identified since 1800, specialists in the management believes that during the transition from the capitalist economy is the developer of modern kleptocracy. An organizational culture disincentives, which is based on a negative value field characterized by non-work, dishonesty, inefficiency, incompetence etc. contributes fundamentally to the creation and development of kleptocracy , the non- performing loan and boundary, bankruptcy or disaster. It is a culture that has dominated the socialist economy and still present today, being concentrated around corruption.
    [Show full text]
  • Corruption in Romania : First Steps Towards a Grounded Theory Of
    SIXTH FRAMEWORK PROGRAMME OF THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION RESEARCH PROJECT: CRIME AND CULTURE Crime as a Cultural Problem. The Relevance of Perceptions of Corruption to Crime Prevention. A Comparative Cultural Study in the EU-Accession States Bulgaria and Romania, the EU-Candidate States Turkey and Croatia and the EU-States Germany, Greece and United Kingdom Iuliana Precupetu Corruption in Romania First Steps Towards a Grounded Theory of Corruption Discussion Paper Series No 4 2007 2 Dr. Iuliana Precupe Ńu is a researcher at the Research Institute for Quality of Life, Romanian Academy and an associate lecturer at the Faculty of Sociology and Social Work, University of Bucharest. She has a doctoral degree in sociology obtained from the University of Bucharest for her thesis on community development. Iuliana Precupe Ńu has ten years of experience in social research and teaching. She is specialised in quality of life, social policy, methodology of social research and the study of corruption. 3 Introduction The first years of transition in Romania have been characterised by an escalation of corruption which largely remained unacknowledged at the social level in a time of rapid economic and social deterioration. Only the late 90’s brought the problem of corruption to public agenda as the media began to reveal some cases of grand corruption and in relation to the process of integration of the country in the European Union. A strong discourse about corruption emerged starting with 2000, which pushed into shadow the more ‘classical’ and visible social problems of transition like poverty, unemployment, or issues related to the consolidation of democracy.
    [Show full text]
  • International Conference KNOWLEDGE-BASED ORGANIZATION Vol
    International Conference KNOWLEDGE-BASED ORGANIZATION Vol. XXIII No 2 2017 MASS-MEDIA COMMUNICATION IN ROMANIA Ioana-Narcisa CREȚU “Lucian Blaga” University of Sibiu, Romania [email protected] Abstract: Over 1200 new publications have appeared in Romania since the fall of communism. Some of them don’t exist anymore, but there always appear new ones. The Romanian newspaper market comprises about 1500 publications most of which appear on a weekly basis and 200 daily newspapers. Television is the most familiar source of information. The radio landscape has changed considerably - similar to the television - since 1990. Besides the public broadcaster offering several programs, there are over 150 private local radio stations and various other channels. Despite the diversity of the Romanian press, we cannot yet speak of a completely free press (see the report of the Freedom House organization). The limitations of media freedom and freedom of speech are related to media ownership, but also with gaps in the national legislation. This study aims to contribute to the advancement in the conceptualization of qualitative journalism by proposing to analyze different situations of failure in investigative journalism and identifying factors that conduct to limitation of media freedom. Keywords: freedom of the press, media landscape, Romania, qualitative journalism 1. Introduction impact of the media ownership (case 1 and 2) The limitations of media freedom and and quality journalism (case 3) in Romania. freedom of speech despite of pluralism of the press in former communist countries in 2. National Media Landscape Southeast of Europe, especially in Romania 2.1. Printed press and Moldavia, are related to media Over 1200 new publications have appeared in ownership as in [1], mentioned by Active Romania since the fall of communism.
    [Show full text]