Judicial Corruption in Eastern Europe: an Examination of Causal Mechanisms in Albania and Romania Claire M

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Judicial Corruption in Eastern Europe: an Examination of Causal Mechanisms in Albania and Romania Claire M James Madison University JMU Scholarly Commons Senior Honors Projects, 2010-current Honors College Spring 2017 Judicial corruption in Eastern Europe: An examination of causal mechanisms in Albania and Romania Claire M. Swinko James Madison University Follow this and additional works at: https://commons.lib.jmu.edu/honors201019 Part of the International Relations Commons Recommended Citation Swinko, Claire M., "Judicial corruption in Eastern Europe: An examination of causal mechanisms in Albania and Romania" (2017). Senior Honors Projects, 2010-current. 334. https://commons.lib.jmu.edu/honors201019/334 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Honors College at JMU Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Senior Honors Projects, 2010-current by an authorized administrator of JMU Scholarly Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Judicial Corruption in Eastern Europe: An Examination of Causal Mechanisms in Albania and Romania _______________________ An Honors Program Project Presented to the Faculty of the Undergraduate College of Arts and Letters James Madison University _______________________ by Claire Swinko May 2017 Accepted by the faculty of the Department of Political Science, James Madison University, in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Honors Program. FACULTY COMMITTEE: HONORS PROGRAM APPROVAL: Project Advisor: John Hulsey, Ph.D., Bradley R. Newcomer, Ph.D., Associate Professor, Political Science Director, Honors Program Reader: John Scherpereel, Ph.D., Professor, Political Science Reader: Charles Blake, Ph. D., Professor, Political Science Dedication For my dad, who supports and inspires me everyday. You taught me to shoot for the stars, and I would not be half the person I am today with out you. 2 Table of Contents List of Figures…………………………………………………………………..4 Acknowledgements…………………………………………………………......5 Introduction…………………………………………………………………......6 Chapter 1: Literature Review and Hypotheses………………………………....11 Chapter 2: Methodology…………...….…………………………………..........33 Chapter 3: Judicial Corruption in Albania……………………………………...47 Chapter 4: Judicial Corruption in Romania………………………………….....93 Chapter 5: Findings and Comparisons……………………………………........135 Conclusion……………………………………………………………………..155 Appendix………………………………………………………………….........163 References by Chapter……………………………………………………........170 3 List of Figures 1 Global perceived levels of judicial corruption …….........……………………..39 2 Comparative values for the CEE region…………………..................................40 3 Average of comparative values for CEE EU and non-EU member countries….40 4 Average comparative scores for CEE region…………………………………...41 5 Overview of Albanian judiciary………………………………………………...49 6 Final results……………………………………………………………………..155 7 Effect of EU membership and candidate status………………………………...157 4 Acknowledgements I would like to thank my thesis project advisor, Dr. John Hulsey, for his guidance and feedback throughout this process; my readers, Dr. John Scherpereel and Dr. Charles Blake, for providing me with helpful comments and direction; and Dr. Hak-Seon Lee for his guidance and support during our honors thesis colloquium classes. I would also like to thank my friends and family for their constant love and encouragement. 5 Introduction After the fall of communism in 1989, the countries of Central and Eastern Europe (CEE) began their transitions from communist strongholds to pillars of democracy. Each CEE country has undergone (or is in the process of undergoing) its own unique democratization process, but most have encountered a similar problem: eradicating the high levels of corruption that have become endemic within their institutions. Corruption can come in many forms. Transparency International, the leading global organization focused on combating corruption, identifies at least eighteen different forms of corruption on its website. Once corruption takes hold in an institution, it quickly spreads to another, and this pattern continues until it becomes widespread within a society. Literature on corruption is robust, and scholars have identified an extensive list of causes to explain how corruption can take root in a country’s institutions. While corruption is a global phenomenon and certainly is not unique to Central and Eastern Europe, it has become systemic in many CEE countries, causing the gradual weakening of the judiciary and rule of law. Transparency International ranks CEE countries among the most corrupt countries in the world. Many studies on corruption focus solely on countries that are developing or newer democracies. While it is true there are countries in the CEE region that can be classified as developing democracies, I chose this particular region because I am interested in examining corruption in post-communist societies. The beauty of the CEE region is found in its political and economic diversity. The countries of CEE have dramatically transformed since 1989, and though no two countries are alike, the homogeneity across numerous variables commonly associated with high levels of judicial corruption makes this region particularly interesting to research. 6 This study seeks to evaluate causes of judicial corruption in two CEE countries, Albania and Romania, in an effort to better understand why and how judicial corruption can become rampant in certain political and economic climates. This study also attempts to extrapolate causes of judicial corruption at the regional level to account for the region’s high judicial corruption values on Transparency International’s Global Corruption Barometer. My project is qualitative in nature and uses case studies to examine causal mechanisms of judicial corruption in Albania and Romania. I use the method of process tracing to track three independent variables over the following time periods: 2000-2004; 2004-2008; 2008-2012; and 2012- present. The three independent variables in this study are judicial independence, EU membership and candidacy status, and levels of media freedom. The two case studies featured in this project have roughly similar judicial corruption levels. Both can be classified as moderately to highly corrupt using Transparency International’s classification system. However, they do differ on certain political and economic variables, suggesting that there are causes that could be country-specific. Of particular interest in this study is the effect of EU membership and candidacy status on curbing judicial corruption levels. The effect of membership in global institutions on promoting democracy is a hotly debated topic in literature, and is particularly relevant today, as the European Union has come under attack in recent years by those who no longer believe the institution to be effective. A key tenant of democracy is upholding the rule of law and respecting the autonomy of the judiciary. An independent judiciary is vested with the proper authority to carry out its mandate, is free from politicization, and preferences upholding the rule of law over pursuing individual interests. Theoretically speaking, EU member and candidate countries should have lower levels of judicial corruption because they have underwent, or are in the process of 7 undergoing, the EU’s strict accession process. As a result, they have adopted numerous laws that are meant to promote a healthy democracy, a key component of which is an independent judiciary. Conditionality is the EU’s most powerful weapon, and over the years it has appeared to be losing its effect. Many CEE EU member countries have been accused of “democratic backsliding”—or the reversion to authoritarian tendencies and a disrespect for the rule of law. Romania, one of the case studies featured in this study, has followed this trend. Literature on this relationship will be explored in depth in the next chapter of this study, but the general consensus amongst scholars is that the effect of EU membership and candidacy status on curbing corruption levels is positive, but there are limitations to the extent of its effectiveness in different stages of the accession process (see Vachudova, 2009; Garbbe, 2014; Dimitrova, 2010). My findings support those of other scholars. First, I argue that the European Union is moderately effective in lowering judicial corruption levels in the early stages of accession, but is even more effective in lowering corruption levels once a country obtains candidacy status and gets closer to acceding to the Union. I also find that EU conditionality stagnates once a country accedes to the EU, as in Romania, because the “carrot” of membership status has been achieved and the “stick” is no longer effective in persuading political elites to continue reforms. Second, I make the case that the domestic context of the potential member country is important when discussing the effect of EU membership and candidacy status on lowering corruption levels. This study examines the influence of public opinion, the political will of the government to adopt EU reforms, and the possible influence of EU “enlargement fatigue”. Second, I examine the relationship between judicial independence and judicial corruption levels. Judicial independence, as previously stated, is a key tenant of a healthy judiciary. If a 8 judiciary is not autonomous from politicians, businessmen, or organized crime, then it is entirely likely that external actors will place undue pressure on judges and other important members of the judiciary. Due to the overarching nature of judicial independence,
Recommended publications
  • Implementing World Bank Projects
    0~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~rg t, ..O - -- WX.'bVIii.,I E,'IIIY"i' -;;' Public Disclosure Authorized %I1iIVE ; ~~~~~~~~~~~1 ''. CZW0'ISd:II' wB I C.-:: ;1344-. :0 Public Disclosure Authorized |~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~!:r ' I Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized IBRD25966 FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF YUGOSLAVIA ¼ Kosovo - ShkodEr' EtEVAllON INCaaR.^iIk'< rn It I ALBANIA . r @ h~~~~~AnoLATL- ' ¼ ELEVATIONSIN METRSt BELOW200 200 '20f)~~~~~~~~~ FYR 20O.~~2043 tc~~, mACEDONIA SELECTEDTOWNS uil ® DtMCTaCENTERS El-)1 NATIOiNA CAPITALA C r ~ 4% INTER$ZATIONALAIRPOIRT~ ® --- INTERNAlIONAL.BOUNDARtE 0r t~~~~~~~~~~~t~ 42 " 0~ ~~~~l425a GREECEd ADR,iAft.C-ZCv& INIAN -GREEC SE Corfu ALBANIAAND THE WORLD BANK BUILDING THE FUTURE THE WORLD BANm Washington, D.C. The views and interpretations in this booklet are not necessarily those of the Executive Directors of the World Bank or the countries they represent. The map on the inside front cover was prepared exclusively for the convenience of readers of this booklet; the denominations used and the boundaries shown do not imply, on the part of the World Bank and its afiliates, any judgment on the legal status of any territory or any endorsement or acceptance of such boundaries. Albania and the World Bank was written by Mary Catherine Andrews and Gulhan Ovalioglu of the Central Europe Country Department or the World Bank's Europe and Central Asia Regional Office, with the assistance of numerous colleagues in the department and counterparts in Albania. Photographic credits Cover: Gisu Mobadjer Page 2: Gulhan Ovalioglu Page 10: Kemal Dervi Page 13: Gulhan Ovalioglu Page 25: Richard MacEwen Page 31: Gian Carlo Guarda Page 35: Maria Nowak Page 40: Maia Nowak P_age45: Matthew Vogel Page 57: Daniel Zelikow 'Page 62: Rory O'Sullivan Page 67: Gisu Mahadjer Page 80: M.
    [Show full text]
  • Fighting Corruption with Con Tricks: Romania's Assault On
    FIGHTING CORRUPTION WITH CON TRICKS: ROMANIA’S ASSAULT ON THE RULE OF LAW David Clark FIGHTING CORRUPTION WITH CON TRICKS FIGHTING CORRUPTION WITH CON TRICKS: ROMANIA’S ASSAULT ON THE RULE OF LAW 2 FIGHTING CORRUPTION WITH CON TRICKS Executive Summary Democracy in Europe is facing its greatest challenge since the fall of the Berlin Wall. The threat comes not only from the rise of political movements that openly reject liberal democratic values, including the governing parties of Hungary and Poland, but also from the risk of creeping authoritarianism caused by a gradual decline in standards of governance and the weakening of important democratic underpinnings, such as the rule of law. Romania is a country of particular concern. Although it has earned international praise for its recent efforts to stamp out corruption, a detailed examination of Romania’s anti-corruption activities shows that they often provide convenient cover for acts of political score settling and serious human rights violations. The methods used show a considerable degree of continuity with the practices and attitudes of the communist era. The strong correlation between those targeted for prosecution and the interests of those in power is indicative of politicised justice. Cases have often been accompanied by campaigns of public vilification designed to maximise their political impact. Far from being above politics, Romania’s National Anti-corruption Directorate (DNA) is an active participant in its partisan struggles. Although the rule of law requires the justice system to work independently of government, there is clear evidence of collusion between prosecutors and the executive in Romania.
    [Show full text]
  • Monitoring SPAK and the Special Court: Building At
    Rr. “Alqi Boshnjaku” (ish Reshit Collaku) Pallati Bora, Ap.11 TIRANË [email protected] [email protected] COLLECTION OF CASE REPORTS AND UPDATES JULY 2020 – APRIL 2021 PROJECT: “Monitoring SPAK and the Special Court: Building a track record of prosecutions and convictions?”, supported by the Embassy of the Kingdom of the Netherlands, through the MATRA funds. Implemented by: The Center for Legal and Social Studies (LSSC) MAY 2021 Rr. “Alqi Boshnjaku” (ish Reshit Collaku) Pallati Bora, Ap.11 TIRANË [email protected] [email protected] SUMMARY This collection of case reports and updates is produced by the Center for Legal and Social Studies (LSSC), in the framework of the project: “Monitoring SPAK and the Special Court: Building a track record of prosecutions and convictions?”, supported by the Embassy of the Kingdom of the Netherlands, through the MATRA funds. In total there are 40 case reports and/or updates of indictments/ convictions prosecuted by SPAK and adjudicated by the Special Court (First Instance and Court of Appeals). The cases selected are mostly of a high profile, either due to the public officials involved, or because of the important trend they represent in tackling organized crime and corruption. The independent comments provided for each case aim to evaluate, from a qualitative perspective, whether these two new institutions are delivering concrete results, worthy of building a track record against organized crime and corruption. The reports are published periodically and can be found in Albanian and in English at: https://lssc-al.com/activities/?lang=en Rr. “Alqi Boshnjaku” (ish Reshit Collaku) Pallati Bora, Ap.11 TIRANË [email protected] [email protected] ROLLING TRACK RECORD REPORT July 2020 Prepared and published by: Legal and Social Studies Center, 01 August 2020.
    [Show full text]
  • Here a Causal Relationship? Contemporary Economics, 9(1), 45–60
    Bibliography on Corruption and Anticorruption Professor Matthew C. Stephenson Harvard Law School http://www.law.harvard.edu/faculty/mstephenson/ March 2021 Aaken, A., & Voigt, S. (2011). Do individual disclosure rules for parliamentarians improve government effectiveness? Economics of Governance, 12(4), 301–324. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10101-011-0100-8 Aaronson, S. A. (2011a). Does the WTO Help Member States Clean Up? Available at SSRN 1922190. http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1922190 Aaronson, S. A. (2011b). Limited partnership: Business, government, civil society, and the public in the Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative (EITI). Public Administration and Development, 31(1), 50–63. https://doi.org/10.1002/pad.588 Aaronson, S. A., & Abouharb, M. R. (2014). Corruption, Conflicts of Interest and the WTO. In J.-B. Auby, E. Breen, & T. Perroud (Eds.), Corruption and conflicts of interest: A comparative law approach (pp. 183–197). Edward Elgar PubLtd. http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:hul.ebookbatch.GEN_batch:ELGAR01620140507 Abbas Drebee, H., & Azam Abdul-Razak, N. (2020). The Impact of Corruption on Agriculture Sector in Iraq: Econometrics Approach. IOP Conference Series. Earth and Environmental Science, 553(1), 12019-. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/553/1/012019 Abbink, K., Dasgupta, U., Gangadharan, L., & Jain, T. (2014). Letting the briber go free: An experiment on mitigating harassment bribes. JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ECONOMICS, 111(Journal Article), 17–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2013.12.012 Abbink, Klaus. (2004). Staff rotation as an anti-corruption policy: An experimental study. European Journal of Political Economy, 20(4), 887–906. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2003.10.008 Abbink, Klaus.
    [Show full text]
  • The Magnitsky Law and the Rico
    SSRG International Journal of Economics and Management Studies Volume 8 Issue 7, 6-20, July, 2021 ISSN: 2393 – 9125 /doi:10.14445/23939125/IJEMS-V8I7P102 © 2021 Seventh Sense Research Group® The Magnitsky Law and The Rico Law - The Guarantee For The Fight Against Corruption And The Mafia In Bulgaria And The European Union - The Example of The Attempts To Steal Private Land Through Concession, Theft of Land And Theft of Land Through State Structures Lord Prof. PhD PhD Momtchil Dobrev-Halachev Scientific Research Institute Dobrev & Halachev.JSC., Sofia.Bulgaria Received Date: 17 May 2021 Revised Date: 22 June 2021 Accepted Date: 05 July 2021 Abstract - Lord prof PhD PhD Momtchil Dobrev- The fight against the mafia and corruption in Bulgaria Halachev and Prof. Mariola Garibova-DObreva and in the European Commission and the European Union developed 2006 “Theory of degree of democracy” and does not yield results because the mafia is at the highest “Theory of degree of justice / injustice /” based on their state and European level and does what it wants. This practice in court, prosecutor's office, state. Prof. Momchil mafia holds courts, prosecutors and all kinds of state Dobrev has been creating Theory of Corruption, "Theory institutions and the latter carry out its orders. of the Mafia," Theory of Mafia "," Financial Banking Resource Technological Mafia Materialism "since 2003" 1.1 Introduce the Problem The problem with the mafia and corruption in Bulgaria Keywords - Crise, mafia, corruption, Magnitsky law, and in the European Union and the European Commission RICO law, finance. is huge. We have repeatedly applied evidence of the scale .
    [Show full text]
  • Romeo Kara: 5 Misteret E Vrasjes Së Hajdarit Dhe Ç'fshihet Pas Diversionit Të Metës, Fantazmat E Së Shkuarës Duan Pushte
    Rr.Sitki Çiço përballë Maternitetit të Ri, Tel: 067 64 75 153, E-mail: [email protected] Faqe 12 Gjiganti “Raiffeisen” drejt Ç ë m k imi 20 le largimit nga territori shqiptar, “OTP Bank” gati të blejë edhe E Hënë 14 Shtator 2020 bankën më të madhe austriake Uashingtoni shkund drejtësinë, pas KED edhe Romeo Kara: 5 misteret e vrasjes së KLGJ nis lëvizjet për Gjykatën e Lartë, brenda vitit Gjykata Hajdarit dhe ç’fshihet pas diversionit Kushtetuese duhet të jetë gati Presioni i Shteteve të Bashkuara të Amerikës dhe Bashkimit Europian për ngritjen e Gjykatës së Lartë dhe asaj Kushtetuese, Këshilli i Emërimeve të Metës, fantazmat e së shkuarës në Drejtësi dhe Këshilli i Lartë Gjyqësor kanë nisur lëvizjet. Ambasadorja amerikaneYuri Kim, por edhe zëdhënësja e Komisionit për Çështjet... Faqe 7 duan pushtet për të ruajtur pasurinë Vetingu rinis me ritme Faqe 2-3 të shpejta, 6 seanca dëgjimore brenda 3 ditëve, ja kush do japë llogari për pasurinë dhe figurën Komisioni i Pavarur i Kualifikimit po vijon sean- cat dëgjimore për gjyqtarët dhe prokurorët me ritme të shpejta. Brenda 3 ditëve, në kalendarin e punimeve të KPK janë parashikuar 6 seanca dëgjimore, por do të ketë edhe një seancë për shpallje vendimi. Sot, para Komisionit do të japin... Faqe 6 ROZI KOSTANI: Kohë e vështirë për artin, Ministria e Kulturës duhet të vërë në punë teatrot, duhet plan për të ringjallur jetën artistike Rozi Kostani ka marrë suksesin në skenën teatrit dhe po vijon me vlerësime. Me veprën teat- rore “Ata hyjnë pa trokitur” si aktore së fundmi ajo Meta nuk ndal kërcënimet u prezantua para publikut.
    [Show full text]
  • Albania by Blendi Kajsiu Capital: Tirana Population: 2.876 Million GNI/Capita, PPP: $11,880
    Albania by Blendi Kajsiu Capital: Tirana Population: 2.876 million GNI/capita, PPP: $11,880 Source: World Bank World Development Indicators. Nations in Transit Ratings and Averaged Scores NIT Edition 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 National Democratic Governance 4.25 4.50 4.75 4.75 5.00 4.75 4.50 4.50 4.50 4.50 Electoral Process 3.75 3.75 4.00 4.25 4.25 4.00 4.00 3.75 3.75 3.50 Civil Society 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 Independent Media 3.75 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.25 4.25 4.25 Local Democratic Governance 2.75 3.00 3.25 3.25 3.50 3.50 3.50 3.50 3.50 3.50 Judicial Framework and Independence 4.25 4.25 4.25 4.75 4.75 4.75 4.75 4.75 4.75 4.75 Corruption 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.25 5.25 5.25 5.25 5.25 5.25 Democracy Score 3.82 3.93 4.04 4.14 4.25 4.18 4.14 4.14 4.14 4.11 NOTE: The ratings reflect the consensus of Freedom House, its academic advisers, and the author(s) of this report. The opinions expressed in this report are those of the author(s). The ratings are based on a scale of 1 to 7, with 1 representing the highest level of democratic progress and 7 the lowest.
    [Show full text]
  • Democratic Backsliding in Bulgaria Institute for Market Economics
    Democratic Backsliding in Bulgaria Institute for Market Economics *Institute for Market Economics is partnering with the "Center for International Private Enterprise" in the initiative "Building Unity and Support for Democratic and Market Values". Contents Intro ......................................................................................................................................................... 2 Democratic Development in Bulgaria ..................................................................................................... 2 Political Landscape .............................................................................................................................. 2 Limits to Prosperity ............................................................................................................................. 5 Democratic Backsliding ....................................................................................................................... 6 Defining the Challenges ........................................................................................................................... 8 Causes of Democratic Backsliding ....................................................................................................... 9 Main Challenges ................................................................................................................................ 11 Judicial System and Corruption ............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • A Tale of Two Visa Regimes: Repercussions of Romania's Accession to the Eu on the Freedom of Movement of Moldovan Citizens
    UNISCI DISCUSSION PAPERS Nº 10 (Enero / January 2006) A TALE OF TWO VISA REGIMES: REPERCUSSIONS OF ROMANIA’S ACCESSION TO THE EU ON THE FREEDOM OF MOVEMENT OF MOLDOVAN CITIZENS AUTHOR:1 GEORGE DURA2 Centre for European Policy Studies (CEPS), Brussels Introduction In many ways Moldova’s3 efforts to obtain a facilitated visa regime with (future) EU/Schengen states is a case of déjà vu across Europe. Moldova finds itself in the same situation as Russia, Ukraine and certain states of the Western Balkans were in before the 2004 enlargement, prior to becoming direct EU neighbours. Moldova has recently been requesting the EU to open talks on a facilitated regime, not only because Romania’s accession to the EU in 2007 adds a sense of urgency to this issue, but also because neighbouring Ukraine is in the process of negotiating such a facilitated visa regime with the EU. Moldova and Ukraine both signed an Action Plan with the EU in February 2005 as part of the European Neighbourhood Policy. Finally, the Moldovan government would thereby also be able to present its electorate with tangible benefits resulting from the progress towards EU integration. However, so far Moldova’s requests have not yet been granted by the EU. The EU has so far failed to set a date for opening the negotiations on a visa facilitated regime with Moldova. The road towards a facilitated visa regime with EU/Schengen states or new EU member states which are in the process of implementing the Schengen acquis has already been taken by several states, such as Russia, Ukraine or Serbia and Montenegro4.
    [Show full text]
  • Crime and Culture : Breaking New Ground in Corruption Research
    SIXTH FRAMEWORK PROGRAMME OF THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION RESEARCH PROJECT: CRIME AND CULTURE Crime as a Cultural Problem. The Relevance of Perceptions of Corruption to Crime Prevention. A Comparative Cultural Study in the EU-Accession States Bulgaria and Romania, the EU-Candidate States Turkey and Croatia and the EU-States Germany, Greece and United Kingdom Dirk Tänzler Konstadinos Maras Angelos Giannakopoulos Crime and Culture Breaking New Ground in Corruption Research Discussion Paper Series No 1 2007 2 Dr. Dirk Tänzler is currently visiting Professor at the University of Zurich 2007, Assistant Professor at the University of Konstanz and Co-ordinator of the EU-Research-Consortium ‘Crime and Culture’ 2006-2008. He was Visiting Professor at Vienna University 2005, 2006, Visiting Lecturer at the University of Luzern 2005-2008, Zeppelin University, Friedrichs- hafen 2006, University of Salzburg 2005, Humboldt University of Berlin 1995, 1996. Director of the Sozialwissenschaftliches Archiv Konstanz (“Alfred-Schütz-Gedächtnis-Archiv)/ Zentralarchiv der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Soziologie 2000-2005, Research Fellow at the University of Konstanz 1999-2000, Research Fellow at the Science Centre Berlin for Social Research (WZB) 1993-1997, Research Fellow at the Institute for Economic Culture at Boston University 1991-1992. He earned his postdoctoral degree (Habilitation) at the University of Konstanz 2005 and his Ph.D. at J.-W. Goethe University of Frankfurt a.M. 1990. His special research and teaching interests are Sociological Theory, Social Philosophy, History of Sociology, Sociology of Knowledge, Sociology of Culture, Political Sociology, Qualitative Methods, Hermeneutics, Media Analysis, Visual Sociology. Dr. Dr. Konstadinos Maras is Lecturer at the University of Tübingen, Faculty of Cultural Sciences, Institute of Art History and research assistant at the “European Centre for Scientific, Ecumenical and Cultural Co-operation”, Würzburg, responsible for documentation and research on the European and International Philhellenism.
    [Show full text]
  • Corruption Assessment Report Albania
    CORRUPTION ASSESSMENT REPORT ALBANIA Copyright © 2016, Albanian Center for Economic Research (ACER), South-East Europe Leadership for Development and Integrity (SELDI) Acknowledgments This report was prepared by ACER under guidance from the Center for the Study of Democracy (CSD, Sofia - Bulgaria) within the framework of SELDI network. Research coordination and report preparation: Zef Preci (ACER) Brunilda Kosta (ACER) Eugena Topi (ACER) Lorena Zajmi (ACER) Field research: Fatmir Memaj (Albanian Socio-Economic Think Tank, ASET) Dhimiter Tole (Faculty of Economy, University of Tirana) Sincere thanks are expressed to the staff engaged with dedication and professionalism in the field work carried for the project survey. Project Associates in Albania: House of Europe, Tirana (Albania) Associated partners in Albania: Albanian Media Institute (AMI), Albania Institute for Democracy and Mediation, Albania We would like to acknowledge the contribution to the report of Mr. Ruslan Stefanov (CSD) and Ms Daniela Mineva (CSD). The survey, in which the current report is based, has followed the Corruption Monitoring System methodology. Mr. Alexander Gerganov (Vitosha Research) has provided methodological guidance and instructions in carrying out the survey and delivering the results. This publication has been produced with the financial assistance of the European Union. The contents of this publication are the sole responsibility of the SELDI initiative and can in no way be taken to reflect the views of the European Union. 1 Project Title: Civil Society
    [Show full text]
  • Law on the Status of Judges and Prosecutor in the Republic of Albania Including Initial Law No
    Funded by the E uro p ean U ni o n STATUS OF JUDGES AND PROSECUTORS STATUSI I GJYQTARËVE DHE PROKURORËVE Disclaimer: Please note that this document is an unofficial translation and is provided for information purposes only. It confers no rights and imposes no obligations separate from those conferred or imposed by the legislation formally adopted and published in the Albanian language. EURALIUS makes no guarantee of accuracy and waives responsibility for the use that might be made of the following information. Date of last check: 30 September 2019 Unofficial translation of the consolidated version of the Law on the Status of Judges and Prosecutor in the Republic of Albania including Initial Law no. 96/2016, dated 06.10.20161 Decision no. 34, dated 10.04.2017 of the Constitutional Court (CC)2 Amending Law no. 48/2019 dated 18.07.20193 LAW No 96/2016 ON THE STATUS OF JUDGES AND PROSECUTORS IN THE REPUBLIC OF ALBANIA Based on Articles 81 and 83, paragraph 1, of the Constitution, on the proposal of a group of Members of the Assembly, ASSEMBLY OF THE REPUBLIC OF ALBANIA D E CI D ED: 1 Law no. 96/2016 adopted on 06.10.2016 entered into force on 22.11.2016. 2 Decision no. 34 dated 10.04.2017of the Constitutional Court entered into force on 18.04.2017 and repealed as incompatible with the Constitution of the Republic of Albania provisions marked as follows: repealed. 3 Law no.48/2019 dated 18.07.2019 adopted on 18.07.2019, entered into force on 21.08.2019.
    [Show full text]