The Equivalency Canard

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Equivalency Canard HAARETZ BOOKS May 2011 Jerusalem sacred and profane Everyone's favorite comfort food ‘No worse than “elite” TV’ James Carroll’s look at a city and an idea 5 A cookbook of potatoes 16 Reality shows under examination 18 Hol o c a u s t St u d i e s The equivalency canard An innovative historical approach lumps Nazi and Soviet murder campaigns together, ignoring the implacable ideological roots behind the Shoah and giving Holocaust collaborators a free ride Bloodlands: Europe Between Hitler and Stalin dubs “the Bloodlands,” taking in 1932-1945. These murderous cam- by Timothy Snyder. Basic Books, 524 pages, $29.95 the area from central Poland to paigns are the central subject of By Efraim Zuroff western Russia through Ukraine, Snyder’s book, which has earned Belarus and the Baltics. It is in this lavish praise from historians, as n this bold attempt to reframe region that, by his account, more well as considerable public atten- a critical period in modern than 14 million civilians were mur- tion, not normally the case with I Eastern European history, Yale dered as a result of deliberate similar academic studies. historian Tim Snyder redraws his- policies of mass annihilation im- Snyder identifies six major mur- torical boundaries to create an ar- plemented by Nazi Germany and der campaigns carried out by the tificial geographic entity that he the Soviet Union during the years German and Soviet dictatorships Continued on page 4 4 BOOKS )""3&5;ď.BZ .BZď)""3&5; would have been appalled to have their Equivalency Jewish identity denied, when it is clear that Continued from page 1 it was the reason for their murder. In this respect, Snyder’s postmodern approach at- during the period that roughly corresponds tributes attitudes popular now to individu- to the existence of the Third Reich. During als who lived and died in the 1930s and ’40s the first, some 3.3 million Soviet citizens, and identified Jews, Poles, Ukrainians, etc. mostly Ukrainians, died of starvation as a If these issues were purely philosophi- result of a famine purposely engineered cal and not the subject of intense contem- by Stalin to advance collectivization in porary political debates with highly impor- 1932-1933. This was followed by the “Great tant practical implications, it would have Terror” of 1937-1938, during which the been far easier to appreciate the scope Soviet security apparatus killed 300,000 of Snyder’s research, his novel approach Soviet citizens, most of them Polish and to the subject, his command of so many Ukrainian citizens, in the Bloodlands. From languages, his creative and surprising the start of World War II until the German historical comparisons and his wonderful invasion of the USSR in June 1941, an ad- prose. The problem is, however, that this ditional 200,000 Poles were executed by book is already on its way to becoming the both occupiers, and during the German oc- bible of the Holocaust distorters in post- cupation of parts of the Soviet Union ‏(1941- Communist Eastern Europe. 1944‏), 4.2 million local residents were delib- Ever since the fall of the Soviet Union erately caused to starve to death. If we add and the transition to democracy, the nations Snyder’s estimate of 5.4 million Jews shot that suffered under Communism ‏(both in- or gassed in the Bloodlands by the Nazis side and outside the Bloodlands‏) have suf- during the same years and 700,000 civilians, fered from a severe case of “Holocaust mostly Belorussians and Poles, shot by the envy,” which lamentably spawned the Germans in reprisals during the same pe- Prague Declaration of June 2008, which riod, we reach a total of 14.1 million, which calls for a rewriting of historical studies and Snyder considers a conservative estimate textbooks to reflect the ‏(historically false‏) of the civilians deliberately murdered in equivalency between Communist and Nazi the same territory between 1932 and 1945. crimes. The declaration also warns that While none of these facts were un- Europe will never be truly reunited until it known, the murderous policies of both AP recognizes its “common legacy” of Nazism Nazi Germany and the Soviet Union hav- and Communism, and lobbies for a joint ing been extensively researched, Snyder A child walks past a row of bodies at the newly liberated Bergen-Belsen camp, in Germany, April 1945. memorial day for all victims of totalitar- asserts that the “deliberate and direct ian regimes. The proposed date is August mass murder by these two regimes in the 23, the day in 1939 on which the Molotov- Bloodlands is a distinct phenomenon wor- The problem is that this book is already on Ribbentrop agreement was signed, and it thy of separate treatment.” To reinforce was deliberately chosen to reflect the os- his argument, Snyder presents some star- its way to being the bible of the Holocaust tensibly “equal blame” of Hitler and Stalin tling comparisons that point to the osten- for the atrocities of World War II − a theme sible uniqueness and significance of the distorters in post-Communist Eastern Europe. that finds clear expression in Snyder’s book, extremely high number of victims in the in which not a word is mentioned about the murder campaigns described in the book. role of the Soviets in defeating Hitler. Thus, for example, 14 million victims is cally every respect, that suffers the most after World War II. The second reason is In view of the fact that collaboration with 13 million more than the number of U.S. from Snyder’s faulty comparisons. By the far larger number of survivors from the Nazis in Eastern Europe was not only and British soldiers killed during World relating to the Shoah as merely one of six concentration camps, as opposed to death widespread, but also particularly lethal in War II, more than 10 million more than the equally terrible murder campaigns, he ig- camps; Auschwitz is the exception, since it its consequences, it is obvious that all those total number of victims who died in Nazi nores the absolute totality of its implacable also functioned as a labor camp. promoting the Prague Declaration have a and Soviet concentration − as opposed to ideological roots, which would have doomed Snyder’s well-taken points on these clear political agenda that seeks to change death − camps throughout the existence of every Jew in the world regardless of their Holocaust-related issues do not make up their status from nations of perpetrators to both regimes, and two million more than politics, religious practice or communal af- for the major flaw in his treatment of the those of victims, and help them to hide or the number of German and Soviet soldiers filiation, as well as its enormous geographic Shoah, which he relativizes by according at least minimize their own complicity in killed in battle in World War II ‏(excluding scope and the Nazis’ success in enlisting the all the other murder campaigns the status Holocaust crimes. those who starved to death and POWs ex- assistance of so many other Europeans in of “genocide,” although none truly fit the An accepted equivalency between the ecuted by shooting‏). Snyder then proceeds its horrific implementation. Nor should the definition coined by Raphael Lemkin, the crimes committed by the two dictatorships to present his version of the history of the creation of unique industrial mass murder most important component of which is the will grant Communist crimes the status of Bloodlands, one that integrates all the mur- installations in Treblinka, Belzec, Sobibor intent to wipe out an entire people. The genocide, something that will relieve the der campaigns into a single narrative. and Chelmno to carry out the Final Solution problem is that though the victims of these pressure on these societies to confront their As shocking as this litany of mass suffer- be ignored. All these factors make the other tragedies deserve to have their suf- past, since they will then be able to point ing is, the question we must ask is whether Holocaust unique among the murder cam- fering recognized, their perpetrators pun- to the participation of Jewish Communists Snyder’s decision to combine such dispa- paigns that took place in the Bloodlands ‏(or ished and their losses restituted, for the in genocidal crimes against them, thus un- rate tragedies is historically justified. In anywhere else‏) − but acknowledging such most part this has still not taken place, cer- dermining any quest for justice and histor- fact, the only characteristics shared by would apparently detract from Snyder’s re- tainly not at the level accorded to the vic- ical truth. In that respect, Snyder’s unfor- these murder campaigns are that they configuration of the history of mass murder tims of the Holocaust. Snyder, a historian tunate downplaying of the significance of were carried out by dictatorships in a spe- in Eastern Europe between 1932 and 1945. of Eastern Europe who reads many of the the role played by Eastern European Nazi cific geographic area ‏(of Snyder’s creation‏) local languages, obviously feels the pain war criminals and Holocaust collabora- during a specific time period, with similar No longer center stage of the other victims of totalitarian crimes tors, which barely distinguishes between horrific results. These factors, however, and seeks to contribute to a redress of their local victims and native perpetrators and do not necessarily create a true equivalen- Thus, most of the treatment of the Shoah legitimate grievances by reframing the ignores the enormous number of those who cy between them. Their scope was not the in this book focuses not on its uniqueness or events of 1932-1945 in such a way that the volunteered to murder their neighbors and same, the motivation to launch them was historical significance, but rather on a fact Holocaust will no longer occupy the center other Jews ‏(and did so in many cases with not the same ‏(aside from the desire of dic- that reinforces its connection to the other stage it deserves in European history.
Recommended publications
  • Importance of European Remembrance for the Future of Europe
    European Parliament 2019-2024 TEXTS ADOPTED P9_TA(2019)0021 Importance of European remembrance for the future of Europe European Parliament resolution of 19 September 2019 on the importance of European remembrance for the future of Europe (2019/2819(RSP)) The European Parliament, – having regard to the universal principles of human rights and the fundamental principles of the European Union as a community based on common values, – having regard to the statement issued on 22 August 2019 by First Vice-President Timmermans and Commissioner Jourová ahead of the Europe-Wide Day of Remembrance for the victims of all totalitarian and authoritarian regimes, – having regard to the United Nations Universal Declaration of Human Rights adopted on 10 December 1948, – having regard to its resolution of 12 May 2005 on the 60th anniversary of the end of the Second World War in Europe on 8 May 19451, – having regard to Resolution 1481 of the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe of 26 January 2006 on the need for international condemnation of crimes of totalitarian Communist regimes, – having regard to Council Framework Decision 2008/913/JHA of 28 November 2008 on combating certain forms and expressions of racism and xenophobia by means of criminal law2, – having regard to the Prague Declaration on European Conscience and Communism adopted on 3 June 2008, – having regard to its declaration on the proclamation of 23 August as European Day of Remembrance for the Victims of Stalinism and Nazism adopted on 23 September 20083, 1 OJ C 92 E, 20.4.2006, p. 392. 2 OJ L 328, 6.12.2008, p.
    [Show full text]
  • The Prague Summit and Nato's Transformation
    THE PRAGUE SUMMIT AND NATO’S TRANSFORMATION NATO PUBLIC DIPLOMACY DIVISION 1110 Brussels - Belgium Web site: www.nato.int E-mail: [email protected] A READER’S GUIDE THE PRAGUE SUMMIT AND NATO’S TRANSFORMATION SUMMIT AND NATO’S THE PRAGUE PRARGENG0403 A READER’S GUIDE TABLE OF CONTENTS PREFACE 3 I THE SUMMIT DECISIONS 9 II KEY ISSUES 19 New members: Expanding the zone of security 20 New capabilities: Adapting to modern challenges 26 New relationships: Practical cooperation and dialogue 34 After Prague: The road ahead 67 © NATO 2003 NATO INVITEES Country* Capital Population GDP Defence Active Troop *Data based on (million) (billion expenditures Strength national sources Euros) (million Euros) Bulgaria (25) Sofia 7.8 16.9 494 (2.9% GDP) 52 630 Estonia (27) Tallin 1.4 6.8 130 (1.9% GDP) 4 783 Latvia (33) Riga 2.3 8.8 156 (1.8% GDP) 9 526 Lithuania (34) Vilnius 3.5 14.5 290 (2.0% GDP) 17 474 Romania (36) Bucharest 22.3 47.9 1117 (2.3% GDP) 99 674 Slovakia (38) Bratislava 5.4 24.9 493 (2.0% GDP) 29 071 ★ Slovenia (39) Ljubljana 2.0 22.4 344 (1.5% GDP) 7 927 III DOCUMENTATION 71 Prague Summit Declaration – 21 November 2002 72 Prague Summit Statement on Iraq – 21 November 2002 78 Announcement on Enlargement – 21 November 2002 79 Report on the Comprehensive Review of the Euro-Atlantic Partnership Council and Partnership for Peace - 21 November 2002 80 Partnership Action Plan Against Terrorism - 21 November 2002 87 Chairman’s Summary of the Meeting of the Euro-Atlantic Partnership Council at Summit Level – 22 November 2002 94 Statement by NATO
    [Show full text]
  • Prague Process Targeted Initiative: Thematic Areas
    Prague Process Targeted Initiative: thematic areas Information paper 2013 February 2014 Introduction Prague Process The Prague Process is a political initiative that emerged out of the “Building Migration Partnerships” (BMP) Ministerial Conference, which took place in Prague on 28 April 2009. At this conference, the participating states1 adopted the Joint Declaration on principles and initiatives for promoting close migration partnerships. Moreover, the participating states agreed to do so through a comprehensive, balanced and pragmatic approach that respects the human rights of migrants and their family members, as well as of refugees. The text of the BMP Joint Declaration was prepared by participating states with the active participation of several EU bodies and international organisations. Specifically, the Joint Declaration established the following five areas as a basis for cooperation and the last, sixth area was added after the endorsement of the Prague Process Action Plan 2012–2016 in Poznan in November 2011: preventing and fighting illegal migration; integration of legally residing migrants; readmission, voluntary return and sustainable reintegration; migration, mobility and development; legal migration with a special emphasis on labour migration; asylum and international protection. The main aim of the Prague Process has been to promote migration partnerships between states of the European Union/Schengen area, Western Balkans, Eastern Partnership, Central Asia, Russia and Turkey, in line with the Global Approach to Migration
    [Show full text]
  • International Conference Crimes of the Communist Regimes, Prague, 24–25 February 2010
    International conference Crimes of the Communist Regimes an assessment by historians and legal experts proceedings Th e conference took place at the Main Hall of the Senate of the Parliament of the Czech Republic (24–25 February 2010), and at the Offi ce of the Government of the Czech Republic (26 February 2010) Th e publication of this book was kindly supported by the European Commission Representation in the Czech Republic. Th e European Commission Representation in the Czech Republic bears no responsibility for the content of the publication. © Institute for the Study of Totalitarian Regimes, 2011 ISBN 978-80-87211-51-9 Th e conference was hosted by Jiří Liška, Vice-chairman of the Senate, Parliament of the Czech Republic and the Offi ce of the Government of the Czech Republic and organized by the Institute for the Study of Totalitarian Regimes together with partner institutions from the working group on the Platform of European Memory and Conscience under the kind patronage of Jan Fischer Prime minister of the Czech Republic Miroslava Němcová First deputy chairwoman of the Chamber of Deputies, Parliament of the Czech Republic Heidi Hautala (Finland) Chairwoman of the Human Rights Subcommittee of the European Parliament Göran Lindblad (Sweden) President of the Political Aff airs Committee of the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe and chairman of the Swedish delegation to PACE Sandra Kalniete (Latvia) former dissident, Member of the European Parliament Tunne Kelam (Estonia) former dissident, Member of the European Parliament
    [Show full text]
  • Trio Presidency Austria, Bulgaria, Czech Republic 18-Month Work Programme 1 January 2011 – 30 June 2012
    Trio Presidency Austria, Bulgaria, Czech Republic 18-month work programme 1 January 2011 – 30 June 2012 Mission Statement Given the need for and possibilities of enhanced cooperation within the Salzburg Forum, a professional framework for cooperation must be created in the coming decade. The Salzburg Forum remains an informal Central European security partnership. Its central functions should be: firstly, cooperation and lobbying within the EU; secondly, regional cooperation; and thirdly, contributing as effectively as possible to a coherent and credible EU external strategy vis-à-vis relevant countries and regions in the security-relevant neighbourhood of the Salzburg Forum. Thus, defining a common EU policy and making a common contribution aimed at strengthening the area of freedom, security and justice will become the pivotal points of cooperation for the Salzburg Forum. Cooperation of the Salzburg Forum will be determined by the shared interests of all or several partners as well as the principle of solidarity. Other partners can be involved as well. In view of the above, the structures of cooperation should be adjusted to those of the European Union. This implies, above all, the introduction of trio presidencies in the Salzburg Forum, the drafting and implementation of 18-month work programmes and related action plans, as well as the introduction of consistent, professional coordination based on the structures within the EU. 1 1. European Union 1.1. Key challenges 2011 – 2012 1. Implementation of the Stockholm Programme o 1.a. Internal Security Strategy and COSI o 1.b. Asylum system 1.c. Schengen Evaluation 1.d. Accession of Bulgaria and Romania into the Schengen area 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Joint Declaration of the Eastern Partnership Summit, Vilnius, 28-29 Ovember 2013
    COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION EN Vilnius, 29 November 2013 17130/13 (OR. en) PRESSE 516 Joint Declaration of the Eastern Partnership Su it, Vilnius, 28-29 Nove ber 2013 Eastern Partnership, the wa. ahead The Heads of State or Government and the representatives of the Republic of Armenia, the Republic of Azerbaijan, the Republic of Belarus, Georgia, the Republic of Moldova and Ukraine, the representatives of the European Union and the Heads of State or Government and representatives of its Member States have met in Vilnius on 28-29 November 2013. The President of the European Parliament and representatives of the Committee of the Regions, the European Economic and Social Committee, the European Investment Bank (EIB) and the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD) the Conference of Regional and Local Authorities of the Eastern Partnership (CORLEAP) and the Euronest Parliamentary Assembly were also present at the Summit. The Prague Summit in May 2009 launched a strategic and ambitious Eastern Partnership, as a specific dimension of the European Neighbourhood Policy, to further support the sustainable reform processes of all Eastern European countries, States participating in the Eastern Partnership, with a view to accelerating the political association and economic integration of interested partners with the European Union (EU). The agenda agreed in Prague and Warsaw contains the guiding principles of the Eastern Partnership. The participants of the Vilnius Summit re-confirm their commitment to implement them fully. P R E S S Rue de la Loi 175 B – 1048 BRUSSELS Tel.: +32 (0)2 281 6319 Fax: +32 (0)2 281 8026 [email protected] http://www.consilium.europa.eu/press 17130/13 1 EN The participants of the Vilnius Summit reviewed the considerable progress made in the Partnership since the September 2011 Warsaw Summit bringing Eastern European partners closer to the EU and agreed on an ambitious agenda for the way ahead.
    [Show full text]
  • Integrating the Central European Past Into a Common Narrative: the Mobilizations Around the ’Crimes of Communism’ in the European Parliament Laure Neumayer
    Integrating the Central European Past into a Common Narrative: the mobilizations around the ’crimes of Communism’ in the European Parliament Laure Neumayer To cite this version: Laure Neumayer. Integrating the Central European Past into a Common Narrative: the mobiliza- tions around the ’crimes of Communism’ in the European Parliament. Journal of Contemporary European Studies, Taylor & Francis (Routledge), 2015, Transnational Memory Politics in Europe: Interdisciplinary Approaches 23 (3), pp.344-363. 10.1080/14782804.2014.1001825. hal-01355450 HAL Id: hal-01355450 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01355450 Submitted on 23 Aug 2016 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Integrating the Central European Past into a Common Narrative: the mobilizations around the ‘crimes of Communism’ in the European Parliament LAURE NEUMAYER Université Paris 1 Panthéon Sorbonne and Institut Universitaire de France, France ABSTRACT: After the Cold War, a new constellation of actors entered transnational European assemblies. Their interpretation of European history, which was based on the equivalence of the two ‘totalitarianisms’, Stalinism and Nazism, directly challenged the prevailing Western European narrative constructed on the uniqueness of the Holocaust as the epitome of evil.
    [Show full text]
  • Free Trade Awry? on the Export of 'Double Genocide' Revisionism
    DRAFT OF DOVID KATZ’S PAPER “Free Trade Awry? On the Export of ‘Double Genocide’ Revisionism” that appeared in the 2017 volume MEDIEVALES 63: De Christine de Pizan à Hans Robert Jauss Etudes offertes à Earl Jeffrey Richards par ses collègues et amis à l’occasion de son soixante- cinquième anniversaire Textes recueillis par Danielle Buschinger et Roy Rosenstein Presses du “Centre d’Études Médiévales de Picardie” Amiens 2017 413 Free Trade Awry? On the Export of ‘Double Genocide’ Revisionism DOVID KATZ (Vilnius Gediminas Technical University) PREAMBLE The fall of the Iron Curtain swiftly enabled free trade in goods and services between the nation states of Eastern Europe freed from Soviet domination with the West and much of the rest of the world. No less important was a new flow of ideas, generally on a west-to-east trajectory, including organizing principles for political processes and governments, education, media, the arts, and more, in short, models for societal structure and governance. Western mores and institutions readily took root in those nations with substantial anti-Soviet and often anti-Russian sentiments, both among the former Warsaw Pact nations, such as Poland and Hungary, and in some former Soviet republics, principally the three Baltic states, Lithuania, Latvia, and Estonia. One common denominator was a legacy, strong by virtue of personal memory and convincingly conveyed immediate family legacy, of the facts of generally successful independent statehood in the interwar period. By contrast, new states such as Belarus and Ukraine had eastern “halves” that had been part of the Soviet Union from around the time of the Russian Revolution.
    [Show full text]
  • Prague Declaration on European Conscience and Communism
    Prague Declaration - Declaration Text http://www.praguedeclaration.eu/ Prague Declaration on European Conscience and Communism Condemn and teach about the crimes of Communism! June 3rd, 2008, Prague, Senate of the Parliament of the Czech Republic Support the Prague Declaration. Join the Declaration Bearing in mind the dignified and democratic future of our European home, Name whereas societies that neglect the past have no future, Occupation whereas Europe will not be united unless it is able to reunite its history, recognize Communism Email address (optional) and Nazism as a common legacy and bring about an honest and thorough debate on all the totalitarian crimes of the past century, Country whereas the Communist ideology is directly responsible for crimes against humanity, United Kingdom whereas a bad conscience stemming from the Communist past is a heavy burden for the future of Security code Europe and for our children, whereas different valuations of the Communist past may still split Europe into "West" and "East", whereas European integration was a direct response to wars and violence provoked by totalitarian systems on the continent, SUBMIT whereas consciousness of the crimes against humanity committed by the Communist regimes throughout the continent must inform all European minds to the same extent as the Nazi regimes number of signatories crimes did, whereas there are substantial similarities between Nazism and Communism in terms of their 0007739 latest on Sep 13 2014 horrific and appalling character and their crimes against
    [Show full text]
  • Institution and Inclination in the Post-Socialist Space: Genocide As “Memory Intervention”
    MISCELLANEA POSTTOTALITARIANA WRATISLAVIENSIA 6/2017 DOI: 10.19195/2353-8546.6.6 DANA DOLGHIN* University of Amsterdam (Amsterdam, The Netherlands) Institution and Inclination in the Post-Socialist Space: Genocide as “Memory Intervention” Institution and Inclination in the Post-Socialist Space: Genocide as “Memory Intervention”. This article investigates memory discourses around communism in Ukraine and Romania and the manner in which account- ability for the past has been mobilized to shape authoritative trauma based memorializations, public appropriations, and increasingly standardized manners of indexing the past. In the last decade, both countries have gone through successive attempts — through memory legislation, historical commis- sions and historiography — to include these negative historical narratives into an ideational redress in the postsocialist period. Alongside national connotations, I argue that trauma based political projects around memory have become an important site where the narrative of a “European” state is produced. In both national contexts, representations have appropriated and benefitted from more liberal-cen- ter representations of memory, which now match the pan-European paradigm of “totalitarianism” introduced by the Prague Declaration on European Conscience and Communism passed by European Council. This article focuses however on one of the consequences of this transnational dynamics of for representing a renewed, European political space, namely the usage of and appeal to legal notions of memory, such as “genocide”, in both public discourse and historiography. Keywords: remembrance, European memory, legalism, trauma Учреждение и склонность в постсоциалистическом пространстве: геноцид как «вмешательство в память» В этой статье исследуются дискурсы памяти, сформированные вокруг коммунизма в Украине и Румы- нии и способы мобилизации ответственности за прошлое для формирования авторитетных мемориализаций на основе травм, государственных ассигнований и все более стандартизи- рованных способов индексирования прошлого.
    [Show full text]
  • Michael Shafir, “The Nature of Postcommunist Antisemitism in East Central Europe: Ideology’S Backdoor Return” in Journal of Contemporary Antisemitism (JCA), Vol
    PROOF ONLY of Michael Shafir, “The Nature of Postcommunist Antisemitism in East Central Europe: Ideology’s Backdoor Return” in Journal of Contemporary Antisemitism (JCA), vol. 1, no. 2, Fall 2018, pp. 33-61. The final version (version of record) is available exclusively from the publishers at: http://journals.academicstudiespress.com/index.php/JCA/article/view/116 JCA 2018 DOI: 10.26613/jca/1.2.12 PROOF: The Nature of Postcommunist Antisemitism in East Central Europe: Ideology’s Backdoor Return Michael Shafir Abstract This article analyzes contemporary antisemitism and Holocaust distortion in Eastern Europe. The main argument is that Brown and Red, Nazism and Communism, respec- tively are not at all equal. In Eastern Europe, in particular, antisemitic ideology is grounded on the rehabilitation of anticommunist national “heroes.” The history of the Holo- caust is thereby distorted. Based on Maurice Halbwachs’s theory of “social frameworks,” the author shows how “competitive martyrdom,” the “Double Genocide” ideology, and “Holocaust obfuscation” are intertwined. Empirically, the paper examines these concepts in Lithuania, Latvia, Estonia, Hungary, Serbia and Croatia, and Romania. Keywords: Double Genocide, Holocaust Distortion, East European antisemitism, Holocaust, Gulag, anticommunism, national identity INTRODUCTION everywhere subjected the Holocaust to oblivion We are currently facing a huge struggle over or, at best, to manipulation. To use Shari Cohen’s history and collective memory of the twenti- terminology,2 they indulged in “state-organized eth century. Antisemitism plays a crucial role national forgetting.” in this struggle, as we see tendencies to com- New regimes are engaged in what has pare or equate the Holocaust to the history of been termed the search for a “usable past.” As Communism.
    [Show full text]
  • Memory of Stalinist Purges in Modern Ukraine
    The Gordian Knot of Past and Present: Memory of Stalinist Purges in Modern Ukraine HALYNA MOKRUSHYNA Thesis submitted to the University of Ottawa in partial Fulfillment of the requirements for the PdD in Sociology School of Sociological and Anthropological Studies Faculty of Social Sciences University of Ottawa © Halyna Mokrushyna, Ottawa, Canada, 2018 ii Table of Contents Table of Contents Abstract ...................................................................................................................................................................................................... iv Preface ......................................................................................................................................................................................................... 1 Chapter 1: Methodology ....................................................................................................................................................................... 5 Research question ............................................................................................................................................................................ 10 Conceptual framework ................................................................................................................................................................... 15 Chapter 2: Social memory framework .........................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]