DOCSLIB.ORG

Strengthening European Integration Through the Analysis of Conflict Discourses Revisiting the Past, Anticipating the Future

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Strengthening European Integration Through the Analysis of Conflict Discourses Revisiting the Past, Anticipating the Future D6.16 Policy Recommendations Reports Strengthening European integration through the analysis of conflict discourses Revisiting the Past, Anticipating the Future 9 November 2020 RePAST Deliverable D6.16 Policy Recommendations for Poland Tomasz Rawski & Katarzyna Bojarska Widok Foundation This project has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement No 769252 1 / 19 D6.16 Policy Recommendations Reports Project information Grant agreement no: 769252 Acronym: RePAST Title: Strengthening European integration through the analysis of conflict discourses: revisiting the past, anticipating the future Start date: May 2018 Duration: 36 months (+ extension of 6 months) Website: www.repast.eu Deliverable information Deliverable number and name: D6.16 Policy recommendations reports for each of the countries (8) and the EU in general (1) for addressing the troubled past(s) Work Package: WP6 Dissemination, Innovation and Policy Recommendations / WP6.6 Developing Policy Recommendations (Activity 6.6.1 Developing roadmaps for the countries and the EU to address the issues arising from the troubled past(s) Lead Beneficiary: VeCo/UL Version: 2.0 Authors: Tomasz Rawski, Katarzyna Bojarska Submission due month: October 2020 Actual submission date: 9 November 2020 Dissemination level: Public Status: Submitted 2 / 19 D6.16 Policy Recommendations Reports Document history Version Date Author(s) / Organisation Status Description Distribution Tomasz Rawski, Katarzyna First draft for 1.1 21/07/2020 1st draft Internal Bojarska (Widok) internal review Second draft, ready Email for submission to the communicatio Tomasz Rawski, Katarzyna 1.2 26/08/2020 2nd draft EU and Polish policy- n to policy- Bojarska (Widok) makers and makers and stakeholders stakeholders Third draft, revised in accordance with Tomasz Rawski, Katarzyna the inputs of six EU 1.3 14/10/2020 3rd draft Internal Bojarska (Widok) and Polish policy- makers and stakeholders Fourth draft ready Tomasz Rawski, Katarzyna for peer-review of RePAST cloud 1.4 29/10/2020 4th draft Bojarska (Widok) the RePAST folder consortium Final document, Submitted to revised in line with Tomasz Rawski, Katarzyna EU 2.0 Final the RePAST Bojarska (Widok) Participants consortium Portal comments Peer reviewed by: Partner/Body Reviewer RePAST Consortium Anke Fiedler, LMU 3 / 19 D6.16 Policy Recommendations Reports Table of Contents 1. Introduction 5 2. Methodology 5 3. The EU’s approach to the troubled past in Poland 6 4. Proposing strategies for mitigating the challenges arising from the troubled past: policy recommendations 8 4.1. Media 9 4.2. History 11 4.3. Politics 13 4.4. Arts and culture 14 5. Conclusions 16 References 17 4 / 19 D6.16 Policy Recommendations Reports 1. Introduction Before World War II about one-third of the population of Poland were members of national, ethnic and religious minorities, including Ukrainians, Jews, Belarusians, and Germans. However, as a result of the Nazi and Soviet invasion of Poland, the Holocaust (when about 90% of Polish Jews were exterminated), the expulsion of Germans and the resettlement of Ukrainians, the post-1945 Poland became an ethnically homogeneous nation- state. It is estimated that about 5.7 million Polish citizens died as a result of the German occupation and about 150,000 Polish citizens died as a result of the Soviet occupation. In the aftermath of the war Poland was a state of reduced sovereignty. The communist Polish United Workers’ Party (PZPR) gained firm control over domestic politics, which nonetheless remained under the Soviet influence. In the period 1945-1989, the country’s memory politics was fully dependent on the narrative dictated by the state and influenced by the pro- Soviet optics. However, the collective memory, the acts of oppositional memory, and oppositional commemorative acts recurred in this period and re-emerged in the early 1990s. This is when many troubled past issues entered public sphere from various vantage points and in various ways including the Holocaust, the Roma genocide, forced sexual labour of women and rape as a war crime, the Polish-Ukrainian conflicts, the Polish anti-Semitism and the role of Poles in the Nazi genocide, the participation of Poles in the communist regime, the participation in Poles in oppositional movement against the regime. These and many other elements of the troubled Polish past have been used and abused in public debates, i.e. addressed by the politicians, by cultural and artistic institutions, writers and artists, NGOs and academics. Although in post-1989 Poland this conversation has been multidimensional, two dominant competing trends/narratives can be distinguished: the so-called “pedagogy of shame” vs. the so-called “patriotic pride.” The former one is associated with European integration, modernisation, emancipation and equality within the EU, where Poland features a partner who has worked through its historical traumas, recompensated for the guilts. etc. It was called the pedagogy of shame by the right-wing historians. The latter one is associated with nationalistic, catholic, conservative and anti-European positions. The discourse of pride counters the discourse of guilt and shame by refusing to acknowledge the collective entanglement and, at times, complicity of Poles in the war and post-war crimes, in the wrongdoings against the minorities. It focuses mostly on stressing the victimhood of the Polish nation. In the RePAST research project, we have revisited some of the episodes from the Polish troubled past and analysed their effects in the present. Precisely speaking, we investigated the troubled past, as it appears in four different domains: i) history; b) politics; c) media; d) arts and culture. In this deliverable, which is one of the final outputs of the project, we thus build on the insights gained so far as a result of a multi-method research design employed by the RePAST project. Based on our research in Poland, and in line with the RePAST instructions for WP6.6 set by the University of Ljubljana (in agreement with the consortium) in early 2020, this document outlines the policy recommendations (a country-specific roadmap) for Poland to deal with its troubled past. This document is structured as follows. In Chapter 2, we explain our methodological approach regarding this task, e.g. we: (a) describe the rules of interviewee selection; (b) elaborate on the main factor that influenced the selection process (COVID-19 pandemic); (c) list the names of the interviewees who gave their feedback to us. In Chapter 3, we reconstruct the EU’s approach to the troubled past in post-1989 Poland, divided into four main periods. In Chapter 4, which constitutes the main part of this document, we propose policy recommendations for each of the areas covered by RePAST, i.e.: (i) media; (ii) history; (iii) politics; (iv) arts & culture. Finally, we close our recommendations with concise conclusions. 2. Methodology The first version of the policy recommendations, based on the initial results of RePAST research regarding Poland, was ready in late spring 2020. However, due to the COVID-19 pandemic, all interviews with the policy- 5 / 19 D6.16 Policy Recommendations Reports makers and stakeholders were conducted a little later, in August and September 2020. We decided to wait out the period of greatest pandemic social chaos and tension, and turn to our interviewees during the period of partial normalisation. As shown by the quite high response rate (~50%), this was a good decision which provided us with a valuable input from the interviewees. Importantly, due to COVID-19 pandemic all interviews were conducted online, via videoconferencing (Google Meet). In our interviewee selection process, we were guided by the principle of equal representation of experts from national and EU-levels. We also ensured a proportionate representation of the two main expert groups, i.e. policy-makers and stakeholders. More precisely, at the EU-level we focused on inviting policy-makers, i.e. people who are best informed about what European policies towards the troubled past are at the same time most needed and most feasible. In turn, at national-level we gave the floor primarily to stakeholders who represented think-tanks and public institutions, and are critically oriented towards the policies of the current right-wing government in Poland. In this way we attempted at providing the widest possible response to our recommendations. Eventually, the following interviewees provided their feedback to the first version of the document: 1. (EU-level) Włodzimierz Cimoszewicz – a Polish center-left MEP (2019-2024); the former Prime Minister of Poland (1996-1997) and Foreign Minister of Poland (2001–2005). 2. (EU-level) Danuta Hubner – a Polish center-right MEP (2019-2024); the former European Commissioner for Regional (2004-2009); a member of the International Honorary Council of the European Academy of Diplomacy (since 2012). 3. (EU-level) Michał Boni – a Polish center-right MEP (2014-2019); the former Minister of Administration and Digitization of Poland (2011-2013). 4. (national-level) Bartosz Machalica – a historian and political scientist; the co-founder of the Ignacy Daszyński Centre think-tank, an institution focused, among other things, on cultivating the memory of the achievements of Polish social democracy. 5. (national-level) Katarzyna Wielga-Skolimowska – the former director of the Polish Cultural Institute in Berlin, at present the Director of the Goethe Institute in Saudi Arabia. 6. (national-level) Paweł Machcewicz – a Polish historian and university professor; the former president of the Bureau of Public Education at the Institute of National Remembrance (IPN; 2000-2006) and the director of the Museum of the Second World War in Gdansk (2008-2017). After receiving comments from the interviewees, we revised the first version of policy recommendations and came up with this (final) version of the document. 3. The EU’s approach to the troubled past in Poland The EU approach to the troubled past in post-1989 Poland is worth seeing as part of a broader EU approach to troubled past in Central Eastern Europe (CEE).
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Youtube and the Vernacular Rhetorics of Web 2.0
    i REMEDIATING DEMOCRACY: YOUTUBE AND THE VERNACULAR RHETORICS OF WEB 2.0 Erin Dietel-McLaughlin A Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate College of Bowling Green State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY August 2010 Committee: Kristine Blair, Advisor Louisa Ha Graduate Faculty Representative Michael Butterworth Lee Nickoson ii ABSTRACT Kristine Blair, Advisor This dissertation examines the extent to which composing practices and rhetorical strategies common to ―Web 2.0‖ arenas may reinvigorate democracy. The project examines several digital composing practices as examples of what Gerard Hauser (1999) and others have dubbed ―vernacular rhetoric,‖ or common modes of communication that may resist or challenge more institutionalized forms of discourse. Using a cultural studies approach, this dissertation focuses on the popular video-sharing site, YouTube, and attempts to theorize several vernacular composing practices. First, this dissertation discusses the rhetorical trope of irreverence, with particular attention to the ways in which irreverent strategies such as new media parody transcend more traditional modes of public discourse. Second, this dissertation discusses three approaches to video remix (collection, Detournement, and mashing) as political strategies facilitated by Web 2.0 technologies, with particular attention to the ways in which these strategies challenge the construct of authorship and the power relationships inherent in that construct. This dissertation then considers the extent to which sites like YouTube remediate traditional rhetorical modes by focusing on the genre of epideictic rhetoric and the ways in which sites like YouTube encourage epideictic practice. Finally, in light of what these discussions reveal in terms of rhetorical practice and democracy in Web 2.0 arenas, this dissertation offers a concluding discussion of what our ―Web 2.0 world‖ might mean for composition studies in terms of theory, practice, and the teaching of writing.
    [Show full text]
  • Importance of European Remembrance for the Future of Europe
    European Parliament 2019-2024 TEXTS ADOPTED P9_TA(2019)0021 Importance of European remembrance for the future of Europe European Parliament resolution of 19 September 2019 on the importance of European remembrance for the future of Europe (2019/2819(RSP)) The European Parliament, – having regard to the universal principles of human rights and the fundamental principles of the European Union as a community based on common values, – having regard to the statement issued on 22 August 2019 by First Vice-President Timmermans and Commissioner Jourová ahead of the Europe-Wide Day of Remembrance for the victims of all totalitarian and authoritarian regimes, – having regard to the United Nations Universal Declaration of Human Rights adopted on 10 December 1948, – having regard to its resolution of 12 May 2005 on the 60th anniversary of the end of the Second World War in Europe on 8 May 19451, – having regard to Resolution 1481 of the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe of 26 January 2006 on the need for international condemnation of crimes of totalitarian Communist regimes, – having regard to Council Framework Decision 2008/913/JHA of 28 November 2008 on combating certain forms and expressions of racism and xenophobia by means of criminal law2, – having regard to the Prague Declaration on European Conscience and Communism adopted on 3 June 2008, – having regard to its declaration on the proclamation of 23 August as European Day of Remembrance for the Victims of Stalinism and Nazism adopted on 23 September 20083, 1 OJ C 92 E, 20.4.2006, p. 392. 2 OJ L 328, 6.12.2008, p.
    [Show full text]
  • Object Summary Collections 11/19/2019 Collection·Contains Text·"Manuscripts"·Or Collection·Contains Text·"University"·And Status·Does Not Contain Text·"Deaccessioned"
    Object_Summary_Collections 11/19/2019 Collection·Contains text·"Manuscripts"·or Collection·Contains text·"University"·and Status·Does not contain text·"Deaccessioned" Collection University Archives Artifact Collection Image (picture) Object ID 1993-002 Object Name Fan, Hand Description Fan with bamboo frame with paper fan picture of flowers and butterflies. With Chinese writing, bamboo stand is black with two legs. Collection University Archives Artifact Collection Image (picture) Object ID 1993-109.001 Object Name Plaque Description Metal plaque screwed on to wood. Plaque with screws in corner and engraved lettering. Inscription: Dr. F. K. Ramsey, Favorite professor, V. M. Class of 1952. Collection University Archives Artifact Collection Image (picture) Object ID 1993-109.002 Object Name Award Description Gold-colored, metal plaque, screwed on "walnut" wood; lettering on brown background. Inscription: Present with Christian love to Frank K. Ramsey in recognition of his leadership in the CUMC/WF resotration fund drive, June 17, 1984. Collection University Archives Artifact Collection Image (picture) Object ID 1993-109.003 Object Name Plaque Description Wood with metal plaque adhered to it; plque is silver and black, scroll with graphic design and lettering. Inscription: To Frank K. Ramsey, D. V. M. in appreciation for unerring dedication to teaching excellence and continuing support of the profession. Class of 1952. Page 1 Collection University Archives Artifact Collection Image (picture) Object ID 1993-109.004 Object Name Award Description Metal plaque screwed into wood; plaque is in scroll shape on top and bottom. Inscription: 1974; Veterinary Service Award, F. K. Ramsey, Iowa Veterinary Medical Association. Collection University Archives Artifact Collection Image (picture) Object ID 1993-109.005 Object Name Award Description Metal plaque screwed onto wood; raised metal spray of leaves on lower corner; black lettering.
    [Show full text]
  • The Prague Summit and Nato's Transformation
    THE PRAGUE SUMMIT AND NATO’S TRANSFORMATION NATO PUBLIC DIPLOMACY DIVISION 1110 Brussels - Belgium Web site: www.nato.int E-mail: natodoc@hq.nato.int A READER’S GUIDE THE PRAGUE SUMMIT AND NATO’S TRANSFORMATION SUMMIT AND NATO’S THE PRAGUE PRARGENG0403 A READER’S GUIDE TABLE OF CONTENTS PREFACE 3 I THE SUMMIT DECISIONS 9 II KEY ISSUES 19 New members: Expanding the zone of security 20 New capabilities: Adapting to modern challenges 26 New relationships: Practical cooperation and dialogue 34 After Prague: The road ahead 67 © NATO 2003 NATO INVITEES Country* Capital Population GDP Defence Active Troop *Data based on (million) (billion expenditures Strength national sources Euros) (million Euros) Bulgaria (25) Sofia 7.8 16.9 494 (2.9% GDP) 52 630 Estonia (27) Tallin 1.4 6.8 130 (1.9% GDP) 4 783 Latvia (33) Riga 2.3 8.8 156 (1.8% GDP) 9 526 Lithuania (34) Vilnius 3.5 14.5 290 (2.0% GDP) 17 474 Romania (36) Bucharest 22.3 47.9 1117 (2.3% GDP) 99 674 Slovakia (38) Bratislava 5.4 24.9 493 (2.0% GDP) 29 071 ★ Slovenia (39) Ljubljana 2.0 22.4 344 (1.5% GDP) 7 927 III DOCUMENTATION 71 Prague Summit Declaration – 21 November 2002 72 Prague Summit Statement on Iraq – 21 November 2002 78 Announcement on Enlargement – 21 November 2002 79 Report on the Comprehensive Review of the Euro-Atlantic Partnership Council and Partnership for Peace - 21 November 2002 80 Partnership Action Plan Against Terrorism - 21 November 2002 87 Chairman’s Summary of the Meeting of the Euro-Atlantic Partnership Council at Summit Level – 22 November 2002 94 Statement by NATO
    [Show full text]
  • Painting Photographs: Absence on Mohammed Mahmoud Street
    Bowling Green State University ScholarWorks@BGSU 19th Annual Africana Studies Student Research Africana Studies Student Research Conference Conference and Luncheon Feb 24th, 3:00 PM - 4:20 PM Painting Photographs: Absence on Mohammed Mahmoud Street Kirsten Stricker Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.bgsu.edu/africana_studies_conf Part of the African Languages and Societies Commons Stricker, Kirsten, "Painting Photographs: Absence on Mohammed Mahmoud Street" (2017). Africana Studies Student Research Conference. 3. https://scholarworks.bgsu.edu/africana_studies_conf/2017/005/3 This Event is brought to you for free and open access by the Conferences and Events at ScholarWorks@BGSU. It has been accepted for inclusion in Africana Studies Student Research Conference by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks@BGSU. Painting Photographs: Absence on Mohammed Mahmoud Street Kirsten E. Stricker Stricker 1 Mohammed Mahmoud Street is the metaphoric tomb of Tahrir Square, Cairo where violent protests erupted during the Egyptian Revolution which began in 2011.1 It is on the walls of this street that Ammar Abo Bakr painted outside of his studio for the first time.2 “Lost Eyes,” a large mural commemorating the men and women who lost their eyes in clashes during a demonstration against military rule on November 19, 2011, was the first large mural that he made commemorating those who were injured during the struggle for freedom (Figure 1). Since then Bakr has continued to work on an ever evolving mural on Mohammed Mahmoud Street. While he is responsible for a great number of fascinating pieces of art this paper will focus primarily on the mural he added to the wall in May 2012—a mural of mourning mothers holding photographs of their children who died in the revolution.
    [Show full text]
  • Prague Process Targeted Initiative: Thematic Areas
    Prague Process Targeted Initiative: thematic areas Information paper 2013 February 2014 Introduction Prague Process The Prague Process is a political initiative that emerged out of the “Building Migration Partnerships” (BMP) Ministerial Conference, which took place in Prague on 28 April 2009. At this conference, the participating states1 adopted the Joint Declaration on principles and initiatives for promoting close migration partnerships. Moreover, the participating states agreed to do so through a comprehensive, balanced and pragmatic approach that respects the human rights of migrants and their family members, as well as of refugees. The text of the BMP Joint Declaration was prepared by participating states with the active participation of several EU bodies and international organisations. Specifically, the Joint Declaration established the following five areas as a basis for cooperation and the last, sixth area was added after the endorsement of the Prague Process Action Plan 2012–2016 in Poznan in November 2011: preventing and fighting illegal migration; integration of legally residing migrants; readmission, voluntary return and sustainable reintegration; migration, mobility and development; legal migration with a special emphasis on labour migration; asylum and international protection. The main aim of the Prague Process has been to promote migration partnerships between states of the European Union/Schengen area, Western Balkans, Eastern Partnership, Central Asia, Russia and Turkey, in line with the Global Approach to Migration
    [Show full text]
  • Holocaust Memorial Days an Overview of Remembrance and Education in the OSCE Region
    Holocaust Memorial Days An overview of remembrance and education in the OSCE region 27 January 2015 Updated October 2015 Table of Contents Foreword .................................................................................................................................... 1 Introduction ................................................................................................................................ 2 Albania ................................................................................................................................. 13 Andorra ................................................................................................................................. 14 Armenia ................................................................................................................................ 16 Austria .................................................................................................................................. 17 Azerbaijan ............................................................................................................................ 19 Belarus .................................................................................................................................. 21 Belgium ................................................................................................................................ 23 Bosnia and Herzegovina ....................................................................................................... 25 Bulgaria ...............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • International Conference Crimes of the Communist Regimes, Prague, 24–25 February 2010
    International conference Crimes of the Communist Regimes an assessment by historians and legal experts proceedings Th e conference took place at the Main Hall of the Senate of the Parliament of the Czech Republic (24–25 February 2010), and at the Offi ce of the Government of the Czech Republic (26 February 2010) Th e publication of this book was kindly supported by the European Commission Representation in the Czech Republic. Th e European Commission Representation in the Czech Republic bears no responsibility for the content of the publication. © Institute for the Study of Totalitarian Regimes, 2011 ISBN 978-80-87211-51-9 Th e conference was hosted by Jiří Liška, Vice-chairman of the Senate, Parliament of the Czech Republic and the Offi ce of the Government of the Czech Republic and organized by the Institute for the Study of Totalitarian Regimes together with partner institutions from the working group on the Platform of European Memory and Conscience under the kind patronage of Jan Fischer Prime minister of the Czech Republic Miroslava Němcová First deputy chairwoman of the Chamber of Deputies, Parliament of the Czech Republic Heidi Hautala (Finland) Chairwoman of the Human Rights Subcommittee of the European Parliament Göran Lindblad (Sweden) President of the Political Aff airs Committee of the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe and chairman of the Swedish delegation to PACE Sandra Kalniete (Latvia) former dissident, Member of the European Parliament Tunne Kelam (Estonia) former dissident, Member of the European Parliament
    [Show full text]
  • A Turbulent Year for Ukraine Urbulent Was the Way to Describe 2009 for Ukraine, Which Plunged Into Financial Crisis
    No. 3 THE UKRAINIAN WEEKLY SUNDAY, JANUARY 17, 2010 5 2009: THE YEAR IN REVIEW A turbulent year for Ukraine urbulent was the way to describe 2009 for Ukraine, which plunged into financial crisis. No other European country suffered as much as TUkraine, whose currency was devalued by more than 60 percent since its peak of 4.95 hrv per $1 in August 2008. In addition, the country’s industrial production fell by 31 percent in 2009. Prime Minister Yulia Tymoshenko con- fronted the challenge of minimizing the crisis fallout, while at the same time campaigning for the 2010 presi- dential elections. Her critics attacked her for pursuing populist policies, such as increasing wages and hiring more government staff, when the state treasury was broke as early as the spring. Ms. Tymoshenko herself admitted that her gov- ernment would not have been able to make all its pay- ments without the help of three tranches of loans, worth approximately $10.6 billion, provided by the International Monetary Fund. Her critics believe that instead of borrowing money, Ms. Tymoshenko should have been introducing radical reforms to the Ukrainian economy, reducing government waste, eliminating out- dated Soviet-era benefits and trimming the bureaucracy. The year began with what is becoming an annual tra- Offi cial Website of Ukraine’s President dition in Ukraine – a natural gas conflict provoked by the government of Russian Federation Prime Minister President Viktor Yushchenko and Prime Minister Yulia Tymoshenko at the heated February 10 meeting of Vladimir Putin. Whereas the New Year’s Day crisis of the National Security and Defense Council.
    [Show full text]
  • Trio Presidency Austria, Bulgaria, Czech Republic 18-Month Work Programme 1 January 2011 – 30 June 2012
    Trio Presidency Austria, Bulgaria, Czech Republic 18-month work programme 1 January 2011 – 30 June 2012 Mission Statement Given the need for and possibilities of enhanced cooperation within the Salzburg Forum, a professional framework for cooperation must be created in the coming decade. The Salzburg Forum remains an informal Central European security partnership. Its central functions should be: firstly, cooperation and lobbying within the EU; secondly, regional cooperation; and thirdly, contributing as effectively as possible to a coherent and credible EU external strategy vis-à-vis relevant countries and regions in the security-relevant neighbourhood of the Salzburg Forum. Thus, defining a common EU policy and making a common contribution aimed at strengthening the area of freedom, security and justice will become the pivotal points of cooperation for the Salzburg Forum. Cooperation of the Salzburg Forum will be determined by the shared interests of all or several partners as well as the principle of solidarity. Other partners can be involved as well. In view of the above, the structures of cooperation should be adjusted to those of the European Union. This implies, above all, the introduction of trio presidencies in the Salzburg Forum, the drafting and implementation of 18-month work programmes and related action plans, as well as the introduction of consistent, professional coordination based on the structures within the EU. 1 1. European Union 1.1. Key challenges 2011 – 2012 1. Implementation of the Stockholm Programme o 1.a. Internal Security Strategy and COSI o 1.b. Asylum system 1.c. Schengen Evaluation 1.d. Accession of Bulgaria and Romania into the Schengen area 2.
    [Show full text]
  • HADIFOGSÁG, MÁLENKIJ ROBOT, GULÁG Kárpát-Medencei Magyarok És Németek Elhurcolása a Szovjetunió Hadifogoly- És Kényszermunkatáboraiba (1944–1953)
    HADIFOGSÁG, MÁLENKIJ ROBOT, GULÁG Kárpát-medencei magyarok és németek elhurcolása a Szovjetunió hadifogoly- és kényszermunkatáboraiba (1944–1953) Nemzetközi tudományos konferencia Beregszász, 2016. november 17–20. A II. Rákóczi Ferenc Kárpátaljai Magyar Főiskola Lehoczky Tivadar Társadalomtudományi Kutatóközpontjának kiadványa Beregszász–Ungvár 2017 HADIFOGSÁG, MÁLENKIJ ROBOT, GULÁG Kárpát-medencei magyarok és németek elhurcolása a Szovjetunió hadifogoly- és kényszermunkatáboraiba (1944–1953) Nemzetközi tudományos konferencia Beregszász, 2016. november 17–20. A II. Rákóczi Ferenc Kárpátaljai Magyar Főiskola Lehoczky Tivadar Társadalomtudományi Kutatóközpontjának kiadványa Szerkesztette: Molnár D. Erzsébet – Molnár D. István „RIK-U” Kiadó Beregszász–Ungvár 2017 ББК: 63.3 (2POC)-8 УДК: 323.282 (061.3) Т-12 A kötet a 2016. november 17–20-án Beregszászon megtartott a Lehoczky Tivadar Társadalomtudományi Kutatóközpont által rendezett „HADIFOGSÁG, MÁLENKIJ ROBOT, GULÁG. Kárpát-medencei magyarok és németek elhurcolása a Szovjetunió hadifogoly- és kényszermunkatáboraiba (1944–1953)” c. nemzetközi konferencia anyagait tartalmazza. Készült a II. Rákóczi Ferenc Kárpátaljai Magyar Főiskola Lehoczky Tivadar Társadalomtudományi Kutatóközpont műhelyében az Emberi Erőforrások Minisztériuma támogatásával. Szerkesztette: Molnár D. Erzsébet – Molnár D. István A kiadásért felel: Orosz Ildikó Tördelés: Molnár D. István Borító: Molnár D. István Korrektúra: Hnatik-Riskó Márta A közölt tanulmányok tartalmáért a szerzők a felelősek. A kiadvány megjelenését Magyarország
    [Show full text]
  • Joint Declaration of the Eastern Partnership Summit, Vilnius, 28-29 Ovember 2013
    COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION EN Vilnius, 29 November 2013 17130/13 (OR. en) PRESSE 516 Joint Declaration of the Eastern Partnership Su it, Vilnius, 28-29 Nove ber 2013 Eastern Partnership, the wa. ahead The Heads of State or Government and the representatives of the Republic of Armenia, the Republic of Azerbaijan, the Republic of Belarus, Georgia, the Republic of Moldova and Ukraine, the representatives of the European Union and the Heads of State or Government and representatives of its Member States have met in Vilnius on 28-29 November 2013. The President of the European Parliament and representatives of the Committee of the Regions, the European Economic and Social Committee, the European Investment Bank (EIB) and the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD) the Conference of Regional and Local Authorities of the Eastern Partnership (CORLEAP) and the Euronest Parliamentary Assembly were also present at the Summit. The Prague Summit in May 2009 launched a strategic and ambitious Eastern Partnership, as a specific dimension of the European Neighbourhood Policy, to further support the sustainable reform processes of all Eastern European countries, States participating in the Eastern Partnership, with a view to accelerating the political association and economic integration of interested partners with the European Union (EU). The agenda agreed in Prague and Warsaw contains the guiding principles of the Eastern Partnership. The participants of the Vilnius Summit re-confirm their commitment to implement them fully. P R E S S Rue de la Loi 175 B – 1048 BRUSSELS Tel.: +32 (0)2 281 6319 Fax: +32 (0)2 281 8026 press.office@consilium.europa.eu http://www.consilium.europa.eu/press 17130/13 1 EN The participants of the Vilnius Summit reviewed the considerable progress made in the Partnership since the September 2011 Warsaw Summit bringing Eastern European partners closer to the EU and agreed on an ambitious agenda for the way ahead.
    [Show full text]