Chapter 1 18

Notes

Chapter 1 18. ATI Systems. (2011). Campus solutions. Retrieved from http://www.atisystem.com/markets/campus-alert-systems 1. Truman, J. L., & Langton, L. (2014). Criminal victimization, .htm; Lindsey, S., & Walker, D. (2007, August 23). Va. Tech 2013. Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Statistics. study: Add security, help for troubled students. USA Today, 2. Kyckelhahn, T. (n.d.). Justice expenditures and employ- p. 5A; Toppo, G. (2008, April 15). College on the alert ment extracts, 2 011 . Retrieved from http://www.bjs.gov in low-tech ways, too. USA Today, p. 4D; Easing campus /index.cfm?ty=pbse&sid=33. privacy rules. (2008, April 4). The Week, p. 4. 3. Muskal, M., Winton, R., & Gerber, M. (2015). Death in 19. Lindsey & Walker, see note 18; Toppo, see note 18; “Easing a classroom: Oregon shooter targeted his English class. campus privacy rules,” see note 18. Retrieved from http://www.latimes.com/nation/la-na-or 20. U.S. Congress. (1968). HR 1572; The Omnibus Crime egon-shooting-20151002-story.html. Control and Safe Streets Act (P.L. 90-351). Washington, 4. Fieldstat, E. (2015). Oregon college shooting: Gun- DC: U.S. Government Printing Office; The Comprehensive man Chris Harper Mercer died of suicide, officials say. Crime Control Bill of 1984 (P.L. 98-473). (1984). Washing- Retrieved from http://www.nbcnews.com/storyline ton, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office; The Crime Con- /oregon-college-shooting/oregon-college-shooting-gun trol Act of 1990 (P.L. 101-647). (1990). Washington, DC: man-chris-harper-mercer-died-suicide-officials-n438106. U.S. Government Printing Office; The Violent Crime Con- 5. Healy, J., & Lovett, I. (2015). Oregon killer described as man trol and Law Enforcement Act of 1994 (HR 3355). (1994). of few words, except on topic of guns. Retrieved from http:// Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office; USA www.nytimes.com/2015/10/03/us/chris-harper-mercer PATRIOT Act of 2001 (HR 3162 RDS). (2001). Washing- -umpqua-community-college-shooting.html?_r=0. ton, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office; USA PATRIOT 6. Associated Press. (2015). Fired Oklahoma officer con- Improvement and Reauthorization Act of 2005 (HR 199). victed of raping black women ’picked the wrong lady.’ (2006). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice. Retrieved from http://www.foxnews.com/us/2015/12/11 21. Federal Bureau of Investigation. (2010). Crime in the United /fired-oklahoma-officer-convicted-raping-black-women States, 2009. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice; -picked-wrong-lady.html. The Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act, see 7. Herbert, S. J. (1992, September). King litigation may spur note 20; The Comprehensive Crime Control Bill of 1984, healing or unrest: Rodney King’s civil lawsuit against the see note 20; The Crime Control Act of 1990, see note 20; Los Angeles Police Department. Black Enterprise. Retrieved The Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act of from https://www.highbeam.com/doc/1G1-12539601.html. 1994, see note 20; USA PATRIOT Act of 2001, see note 20; 8. King, R. (1992, May 2). Quotation of the day. The New USA PATRIOT Improvement Act of 2005, see note 20. York Times, p. 6A. 22. Abrams, J. (2011, May 27). Obama, in Europe, signs Patriot 9. Nolan, P., & Lenski, G. (2010). Human societies (11th ed.). Act extension. Associated Press. Retrieved from http:// New York: Paradigm Publishers. abc7chicago.com/archive/8156039/. 10. Durkheim, É. (1885/1938). The rules of sociological method 23. The Disaster Center. (n.d.). United States crime rates, (trans. by S. Solovay & J. Mueller). New York: Free Press; 1960–2009. Retrieved from http://www.disastercenter p. 68. .com/crime/uscrime.htm. 11. Sklar, R. (2008). Pregnancy pact: High schoolers plot- 24. Levitt, S., & Dubner, S. (2006). Freakonomics (rev. ed.) New ted to get pregnant, raise babies together. Retrieved from York: HarperCollins. http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/06/20/pregnancy 25. The Disaster Center, see note 23. -pact_n_108344.html. 26. Pastore, A., & Maguire, K. (2012). Sourcebook of criminal 12. Associated Press. (2009). Blinded Iranian wants eye-for- justice statistics (Table 2.1) Retrieved from http://www eye justice in acid case. Retrieved from http://www.fox .albany.edu/sourcebook/pdf/t212012.pdf. news.com/story/0,2933,504474,00.html. 27. Maraniss, D. (2007, April 19). That was the desk I chose 13. Smith, A. (2015). Forget Ohio. Ten more states try to to die under. The Washington Post, p. A01; Federal Bureau legalize marijuana. Retrieved from http://money.cnn of Investigation. (2007). School shooting: Role of FBI at .com/2015/11/04/news/marijuana-legalization-2016/. Virginia Tech. Retrieved from http://www.fbi.gov/news 14. Durkheim, see note 10. /stories/2007/april/vtech_shoot041607/?searchterm=None. 15. Erickson, K. (1966). Wayward puritans. New York: 28. Data on the number of federal, state, local, and campus MacMillan. police agencies is available at http://bjs.ojp.usdoj.gov 16. London, J. (2009). How the use of marijuana was crimi- /index.cfm?ty=tp&tid=7. nalized and medicalized, 1906–2004. Lewiston, NY: The 29. Reeves, B. (2006, August 1). Federal law enforcement offi- Edward Mellen Press; Goode, E. (2007). Drugs in Ameri- cers, 2004. Retrieved from http://bjs.ojp.usdoj.gov/index can society (7th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill; Faupel, C., .cfm?ty=pbdetail&iid=867. Horowitz, A., & Weaver, G. (2009). The sociology of Ameri- 30. Information on the U.S. Park Police, Traffic Safety Unit, can drug use (2nd ed.). New York: Oxford University Press. is available at https://www.nps.gov/subjects/uspp/traffic- 17. Durkheim, see note 10. safety-unit.htm.

315

Magnifying Glass: Icon made by Freepik from www.flaticon.com; Texture: © echo3005/Shutterstock.

31. Information on U.S. courts is available at http://www DC: U.S. Department of Justice; Rantala & Edwards, see .uscourts.gov. note 8. 32. Parker, L. (2006, February 28). Yates rejects state’s plea 10. Federal Bureau of Investigation. (n.d.). Uniform Crime offer. USA Today, p. 3A. Reports. Retrieved from http://www.fbi.gov/ucr/ucr.htm. 33. Woman not guilty in retrial in the deaths of her 5 chil- 11. Federal Bureau of Investigation. (n.d.). Hate crimes. dren. (2006, July 27). The New York Times. Retrieved from Retrieved from http://www.fbi.gov/hq/cid/civilrights http://www.nytimes.com/2006/07/27/us/27yates.html. /hate.htm. 34. Kaeble, D., Glaze, L., Tsoutis, A., & Minton, A. (2015). Cor- 12. Complying with the Jeanne Cleary Act. Retrieved from rectional Populations in the United States, 2014. Washing- http://clerycenter.org/clery-act-compliance-resources. ton, DC: U.S. Department of Justice Retrieved from http:// 13. National Archive of Criminal Justice Data. (n.d.). National www.bjs.gov/content/pub/pdf/cpus14.pdf. Crime Victimization Survey resource guide. Retrieved 35. Federal Bureau of Prisons. Retrieved from http://www from http://www.icpsr.umich.edu/NACJD/NCVS. .bop.gov. 14. National Archive of Criminal Justice Data, see note 13. 36. The discussion is derived from: Ferdico, F., Fradella, H., & 15. Walsh, A., & Ellis, L. (2007). Criminology. Thousand Oaks, Totter, C. (2008). Criminal procedure for the criminal justice CA: Sage; Biderman A., & Lynch, J. (1991). Understanding professional (10th ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth. crime incidence statistics. New York: Springer-Verlag. 37. Frontline. (2004). The plea. Retrieved from http://www 16. Skogan, W. (1981). Issues in the measurement of victimiza- .pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/plea/etc/synopsis tion. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice. .html. 17. Wells, L. E., & Rankin, J. (1995). Juvenile victimization. 38. Packer, H. (1968). The limits of criminal sanction. Stanford, Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 32, 287–307. CA: Stanford University Press. 18. Lauritsen, J., & Schaum, R. (2005). Crime and victimization 39. Packer, see note 38. in the three largest metropolitan areas, 1980–1998. Washing- 40. Braithwaite, J. (1999). Restorative justice. Burlington, VT: ton, DC: U.S. Department of Justice. Ashgate Press; Braithwaite, J. (2001). Restorative justice and 19. Blumstein, A., Cohen, J., & Rosenfeld, R. (1991). Trend responsibility. In G. Bazemore & M. Schiff (Eds.), Restor- and deviation in crime rates. Criminology, 29, 237–264; ative community justice (pp. 63–84). Cincinnati: Anderson Hindelang, M. (1974). The uniform crime reports revis- Publishing; Braithwaite, J. (2007). Encouraging restorative ited. Journal of Criminal Justice, 2, 1–17; MacDowall, D., justice. Criminology and Public Policy, 6, 689–696. & Loftin, C. (1992). Comparing the UCR and NCS over 41. Elechi, O. (2007). Restorative justice. In G. Barak (Ed.), time. Criminology, 30, 125–132; Messner, S. (1984). The Battleground criminal justice (Vol. 2; pp. 611–618). Westport, ‘dark figure’ and composite indexes of crime. Journal of CT: Greenwood Press; Restorative justice: Beyond crime and Criminal Justice, 12, 435–444. punishment. (1998). Washington, DC: Justice Fellowship. 20. Porterfield, A. (1946). Youth in trouble. Austin, TX: Leo 42. Sadeghi, L., & Price, B. (2007). Social justice. In G. Barak Potishman Foundation; Wallerstein, J., & Wyle, J. C. (Ed.), Battleground criminal justice (Vol. 2, pp. 697–704). (1947). Our law-abiding lawbreakers. Federal Proba- Westport, CT: Greenwood Press; Heffernan, W., & Kleinig, tion, 25, 107–112; Short, Jr., J. F. (1954). A report on the J. (2000). From social justice to criminal justice. New York: incidence of criminal behavior, arrests and convictions Oxford University Press. in selected groups. Research Studies of the State College of 43. Heffernan & Kleinig, see note 42. Washington, 22, 110–118; Short, Jr., J. F., & Nye, F. I. (1958). 44. Heffernan & Kleinig, see note 42. Extent of unrecorded juvenile delinquency. Journal of 45. Heffernan & Kleinig, see note 42. Criminal Law, Criminology, and Police Science, 49, 296–302. 46. Heffernan & Kleinig, see note 42. 21. Ageton, S., & Elliott, D. (1978). The incidence of delinquent behavior in a national probability sample. Boulder, CO: Behavioral Research Institute; Elliott, D., & Ageton, S. Chapter 2 (1980). Reconciling race and class differences in self-re- 1. Stamp, J. (1929). Some economic matters in modern life. ported and official estimates of delinquency. American London: King and Sons; pp. 258–259. Sociological Review, 45, 95–110. 2. Defend Pitbulls. (2009). Pit bull bans (USA). Retrieved 22. National Youth Survey Family Study. Retrieved from from http://defendpitbulls.com/pit-bull-bsl/. http://www.colorado.edu/ibg/human-research-studies 3. The discussion of the Uniform Crime Report is derived /national-youth-survey-family-study. from: Federal Bureau of Investigation. (2015). Crime in the 23. Blackmore, J. (1974). The relationship between self-re- United States, 2014. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of ported delinquency and official convictions amongst ado- Justice. Retrieved from https://www.fbi.gov/about-us/cjis lescent boys. British Journal of Criminology, 14, 172–176. /ucr/crime-in-the-u.s/2014/crime-in-the-u.s.-2014. 24. Gold, M. (1966). Undetected delinquent behavior. Journal 4. Federal Bureau of Investigation, see note 3. of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 3, 27–46; Dentler, R., 5. Federal Bureau of Investigation, see note 3. & Monroe, L. (1961). Social correlates of early adolescent 6. Skogan, W. (1977). Dimensions of the dark figure of unre- theft. American Sociological Review, 26, 733–743; Clark, J., & ported crime. Crime & Delinquency, 23, 41–50; Quetelet, A. Tifft, L. (1966). Polygraph and interview validation of (1831/1984). Research on the propensity for crime at different self-reported deviant behavior. American Sociological ages. Cincinnati: Anderson; Quetelet, A. (1842). Treatise on Review, 31, 516–523. man and the development of his faculties. Edinburgh, Scot- 25. Hindelang, M., Hirschi, T., & Weis, J. (1981). Measuring land: S.W. and R. Chambers. delinquency. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage; p. 114. 7. Walker, S., & Katz, C. (2002). The police in America (4th 26. Wallerstein & Wyle, see note 20; Short, see note 20; Short ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill. & Nye, see note 20. 8. For additional information on the NIBRS, see: Max- 27. Chambliss, W., & Nagasawa, R. (1969). On the validity field, M. (1999). The national incident-based reporting of official statistics. Journal of Research in Crime and Delin- system. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 15, 119–149; quency, 6, 71–77; Gould, L. (1969). Who defines delin- Rantala, R., & Edwards, T. (2000). Effects of NIBRS on crime quency? Social Problems, 16, 325–336; Leiber, M. (1994). statistics. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice. Comparison of juvenile court outcomes for Native Amer- 9. Federal Bureau of Investigation. (2004). Developments in icans, African Americans, and Whites. Justice Quarterly, 11 , the National Incident-Based Reporting System. Washington, 257–279.

28. U.S. Census Bureau. (2014). The 2014 statistical abstract. 56. Klaus, P. (2014). Crimes against persons age 65 or older, Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau. Retrieved from 2003, 1993–2002. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of http://www.census.gov/quickfacts/table/PST045215/00. Justice. 29. Federal Bureau of Investigation, see note 3. 57. Truman & Langton, see note 31. 30. Federal Bureau of Investigation, see note 3. 58. Morgan, R. E., & Mason, B. J. (2014). Crimes against the 31. Truman, J., & Langton, L. (2015). Criminal victimization, elderly, 2003–2013. Retrieved from http://www.bjs.gov 2014. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice. /content/pub/pdf/cae0313.pdf. 32. Truman & Langton, see note 31. 59. Southern Poverty Law Center. (2016). SPLC’s intelligence 33. Levitt, S., & Dubner, S. (2006). Freakonomics (rev. ed.). report: Amid year of lethal violence, extremist groups New York: HarperCollins. expanded ranks in 2015. Retrieved from https://www 34. Sabol, W., West, H., & Cooper, M. (2009). Prisoners in .splcenter.org/news/2016/02/17/splcs-intelligence-report 2008. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice. -amid-year-lethal-violence-extremist-groups-expanded 35. Witkin, G. (1998, May 25). The crime bust. U.S. News & -ranks-2015. World Report, pp. 28–40. 60. Federal Bureau of Investigation, see note 3; Harlow, C. W. 36. Federal Bureau of Investigation, see note 3; U.S. Census (2014). Hate crime reported by victims and police. Washing- Bureau, see note 28. ton, DC: U.S. Department of Justice. 37. Quetelet, Research on the propensity for crime at different 61. Federal Bureau of Investigation. (2014). 2014 hate crime ages, see note 6; Farrington, D. (1983). Age and crime. statistics. Retrieved from https://www.fbi.gov/about-us In M. Tonry & N. Morris (Eds.), Crime and justice (Vol. 7, /cjis/ucr/hate-crime/2014/tables/table-1. pp. 189–250). Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 62. Radzinowicz, L. (1966). Ideology and crime. New York: Hirschi, T., & Gottfredson, M. (1983). Age and the expla- Columbia University Press. nation of crime. American Journal of Sociology, 89, 552–584. 63. Beccaria, C. (1764/1963). On crimes and punishments. 38. U.S. Census Bureau, see note 28. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill. 39. Federal Bureau of Investigation, see note 3. 64. Walsh & Ellis, see note 15. 40. DeLisi, M. (2005). Criminal careers in society. Thousand 65. Clarke, R., & Cornish, D. (1985). Modeling offender deci- Oaks, CA: Sage. sions. In M. Tonry & N. Morris (Eds.), Crime and justice 41. Federal Bureau of Investigation, see note 3. (Vol. 6, pp. 145–167). Chicago: University of Chicago Press. 42. Federal Bureau of Investigation, see note 3. 66. Cohen, L., & Felson, M. (1979). Social change and crime 43. U.S. Census Bureau, see note 28. rate trends. American Sociological Review, 44, 588–609; 44. Federal Bureau of Investigation, see note 3; U.S. Census Felson, M., & Boba, R. (2009). Crime and everyday life Bureau, see note 28. (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. 45. Elliott, D., & Huizinga, D. (1983). Social class and delin- 67. Clarke & Cornish, see note 65. quent behavior. Criminology, 21, 149–177; Huizinga, 68. Hindelang, M., Gottfredson, M., & Garofalo, J. (1978). D., & Elliott, D. (1987). Juvenile offenders. Crime & Victims of personal crime. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger. Delinquency, 33, 206–223. 69. Walsh & Ellis, see note 15. 46. Short, Jr., J. F. (1990). Delinquency and society. Englewood 70. Martineau, H. (1855/2003). The positive philosophy of Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall; p. 115. August Comte. Whitefish, MT: Kessinger. 47. Sampson, R. (1995). The community. In J. Q. Wilson & 71. Lombroso, C. (1876). On criminal man. Milan, Italy: J. Petersilia (Eds.), Crime (pp. 193–216). San Francisco: Hoepli; Wolfgang, M. (1961). Pioneers in criminology: ICS Press. Cesare Lombroso. Journal of Criminal Law, Criminology, and 48. Shaw, C., & McKay, H. (1942/1969). Juvenile delinquency Police Science, 52, 361–369. and urban areas (rev. ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago 72. Goring, C. (1913). The English convict. London: His Majes- Press. ty’s Stationary Office; Hooton, E. (1939/1969). The Amer- 49. Akers, R. (1964). Socioeconomic status and delinquent ican criminal. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press. behavior. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 1, 73. Rowe, D. (2002). Biology and crime. Los Angeles: Roxbury; 38–46; Empey, L., & Erickson, M. (1972). The Provo exper- Rowe, R. (1995). The limits of family influence. New York: iment. Lexington, MA: D.C. Heath. Guilford Press. 50. Stevenson, B. A. (2006). Confronting mass imprison- 74. Mednick, S., Gabrielli, W., & Hutchings, B. (2003). ment and restoring fairness to collateral review of crim- Genetic factors in the etiology of criminal behavior. In inal cases. Harvard Civil Rights–Civil Liberties Law Review. E. McLaughlin, J. Muncie, & G. Witkin (Eds.), Crimino- Retrieved from http://www.law.harvard.edu/students logical perspectives (2nd ed., pp. 67–80). Thousand Oaks, /orgs/crcl/vol41_2/stevenson.pdf. CA: Sage; Mednick, S., & Christiansen, K. (1977). Biosocial 51. Snyder, H., & Sickmund, M. (2006). Juvenile offenders and basis of criminal behavior. New York: Gardner Press. victims: 2006 national report. Washington, DC: U.S. Depart- 75. Farrington, F. (1997). The relationship between low rest- ment of Justice. ing heart rate and violence. In A. Raine, P. Brennan, D. Far- 52. U.S. Department of Justice. (2015). Victims’ rights: crime rington, & S. Mednick (Eds.), Biosocial bases of violence victims’ rights act. Retrieved from https://www.justice.gov (pp. 89–106). New York: Plenum. /usao/priority-areas/victims-rights-services/victims 76. Weir, H., & Kosloski, A. E. (2015). Melding theoretical per- -rights. spectives: A gendered look at low-resting heart rate and 53. Childhelp—Prevention and Treatment of Child Abuse. developmental trajectories of antisocial behavior. Crimi- National child abuse statistics, 2014. Retrieved from nal Justice Studies, 28(1). Retrieved from http://www.tandf https://www.childhelp.org/child-abuse-statistics/; online.com/doi/abs/10.1080/1478601X.2015.1004915 National Center for Injury Prevention and Control. (2006). #.Vty7xvkrLIU. Child maltreatment: Fact sheet, 2006. Atlanta: Centers for 77. Reiff, M., Tippins, S., & Letourveau, A. (2004). ADHD. Elk Disease Control and Prevention; Jones, L. (2006). Child Grove, IL: American Academy of Pediatrics; Pratt, T., Cul- maltreatment trends in the 1990s. Child Maltreatment, 11 , len, F., Daigle, L., & Unnever, J. (2002). The relationship 107–120. of ADHD to crime and delinquency. International Journal 54. Childhelp—Prevention and Treatment of Child Abuse, of Police Science and Management, 4, 344–360. see note 53. 78. Burns, R., & Lynch, M. (2004). Environment crime. New 55. U.S. Census Bureau, see note 28. York: LFB Scholarly Publishing; Fishbein, D. (2001).

Biobehavioral perspectives in criminology. Belmont, CA: 98. See, L., Winfree, Jr., T., Taylor, T., He, N., & Esbensen, F. A. Wadsworth. (2006). Self-control and variability over time. Crime & 79. Day, N., Richardson, G., Goldschmidt, L., & Cornelius, Delinquency, 52, 253–285; Tittle, C., Ward, D., & Gras- M. (2000). Effects of prenatal tobacco exposure on pre- mick, H. (2003). Gender, age, and crime/deviance. Jour- schoolers’ behavior. Journal of Developmental and Behav- nal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 40, 426–453; ioral Pediatrics, 21, 180–188. Grasmick, H., Tittle, C., Bursik, R., & Arneklev, B. (1993). 80. Brennan, P., Grekin, E., & Mednick, S. (1999). Maternal Testing the core empirical implications of Gottfredson smoking during pregnancy and adult male criminal out- and Hirschi’s general theory of crime. Journal of Research in comes. Archives of General Psychiatry, 56, 215–219. Crime and Delinquency, 30, 5–29; Burt, C. H., Simons, R., & 81. Opler, M., Brown, A., Grziano, J., Desal, M., Zheng, W., Simons, L. (2006). A longitudinal test of the effects of par- Schaefer, C., et al. (2004). Prenatal lead exposure, ami- enting and the stability of self-control: Negative evidence nolevulinic acid, and schizophrenia. Environmental Health for the general theory of crime. Criminology, 44, 353–397. Perspectives, 112, 548–552; CBSNews.com. (2004, April 99. Beaver, K. M., DeLisi, M., Mears, D. P., & Stewart, E. 25). Report: CA ignored poison candy; The Denver Post. (2009). Low self-control and contact with the criminal (2001, April 27). Lead-wrapped lollipop poses health justice system in a nationally representative sample of hazard, p. 15A. Retrieved from http://www.cbsnews.com males. Justice Quarterly, 26(4). Retrieved from http:// /news/poison-candy-ignored-by-calif/ www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/074188208025 82. Florini, K., Krumbhaar, G., & Silbergeld, E. (1990). Legacy 93352. of lead. Washington, DC: Environmental Defense Fund; 100. Cooley, C. H. (1902). Human nature and the social order. Needleman, H. (1991). Human lead exposure. Boca Raton, New York: Scribners and Sons; Mead, G. H. (1934). Mind, FL: CRC Press. self, and society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 83. Needleman, H., & Ballinger, D. (1994). Prenatal exposure to Thomas, W. I. (1923). The unadjusted girl. Boston: Little, toxicants. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press. Brown. 84. Freud, S. (1925). The standard edition of the complete psy- 101. Becker, H. (1963). Outsiders. New York: The Free Press; chological works of Sigmund Freud. London: Hogarth Press. Becker, H. (1964). The other side. New York: The Free Press. 85. Skinner, B. F. (1938). The behavior of organisms. New York: 102. Palamara, F., Cullen, F., & Gersten, J. (1986). The effects Appleton; Skinner, B. F. (1953). Science and human behav- of police and mental health intervention on juvenile devi- ior. New York: Macmillan. ance. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 27, 90–106; 86. Bandura, A. (1977). Social learning theory. Englewood Myers, D. (2003). Adult crime, adult time. Youth Violence Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall. and Juvenile Justice, 1, 173–197. 87. Rocky Mountain News. (2007, December 20). Teens charged 103. Thomas, C., & Bishop, D. (1984). The effects of formal in 7-year-old sister’s ‘Mortal Kombat’ death. Retrieved from and informal sanctions on delinquency. Journal of Crimi- https://www.highbeam.com/doc/1G1-172630690.html nal Law and Criminology, 75, 1222–1245. Teen jailed over girl’s ‘Mortal Kombat’ death. Retrieved 104. Jackson, D. B., & Hay, C. (2013). The conditional impact from http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/28704783/. of official labeling on subsequent delinquency consider- 88. Shaw & McKay, see note 48. ing the attenuating role of family attachment. Journal of 89. Only in America. (2008, April 25). The Week, p. 6. Research in Crime and Delinquency, 50(2), 300–322. 90. Sampson, R., & Groves, W. B. (1989). Community struc- 105. Bernburg, J. G., Krohn, M. D., & Riviera, C. J. (2006). ture and crime. American Journal of Sociology, 94, 774–802. Official labeling, criminal embeddedness and subsequent 91. Sampson, R., & Bean, L. (2006). Cultural mechanisms of delinquency: A longitudinal test of labeling theory. Journal killing fields. In R. Peterson, L. Krivo, & J. Hagan (Eds.), of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 43, 67–88. The many colors of crime (pp. 5–11). New York: New York 106. Jackson & Hay, see note 103. University Press. 107. Marx, K., & Engels, F. (1867/1967). Capital. New York: 92. Sutherland, E. (1947). Principles of criminology (4th ed.). International Publishers. Philadelphia: Lippincott. 108. DeLisi, M., & Beaver, K. (2010). Criminology theory. Sud- 93. Hochstetler, A., Copes, H., & DeLisi, M. (2002). Differ- bury, MA: Jones & Bartlett Learning. ential association in group and solo offending. Journal 109. Chicago Area Project. (n.d.). Home page. Retrieved from of Criminal Justice, 30, 559–566; Haynie, D., & Payne, D. http://www.chicagoareaproject.org. (2006). Race, friendship networks, and violent delin- 110. Office of Head Start. (2014). Home page. Retrieved from quency. Criminology, 44, 775–805; Haynie, D., Silver, E., & http://www.acf.hhs.gov/programs/ohs. Teasdale, B. (2006). Neighborhood characteristics, peer 111. National Association of Police Athletic/Activities League. networks, and adolescent violence. Journal of Quantita- (n.d.). Home page. Retrieved from http://www.national tive Criminology, 22, 147–169; Matthews, S., & Agnew, R. pal.org/. (2008). Extending deterrence theory. Journal of Research in 112. Schur, E. (1973). Radical nonintervention. Englewood Crime and Delinquency, 45, 91–118. Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall. 94. Hanson, L. L. (2016). Baby steps: Urban violence, gangs, and 113. DeLisi & Beaver, see note 108. school safety. In S. Harding (Ed.), Global perspectives on youth gang behavior, violence, and weapons use (pp. 19–35). Retrieved from https://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=v3W Chapter 3 BCwAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PA19&dq=differential+asso- 1. Aristotle. (1994). The politics (Book VII, trans. C. Lord). ciation+and+gangs&ots=WHRxZF09CW&sig=J4b9Nk Chicago: University of Chicago Press; p. 4. ftS-qPL-arLKr03uuiMJI#v=onepage&q=differential%20 2. Hostettler, J. (2009). A history of criminal justice in England and association%20and%20gangs&f=false. Wales. Hook, Hampshire, UK: Waterside Press; pp. 22–41. 95. Merton, R. (1938). Social structure and anomie. American 3. Thomas, C., & Bishop, D. (1987). Criminal law: Under- Sociological Review, 3, 672–682; Merton, R. (1968). Social standing basic principles. Newbury Park, CA: Sage; p. 25. theory and social structure (rev. ed.). New York: Macmillan. 4. Thomas & Bishop, see note 3, pp. 25–26. 96. Hirschi, T. (1969). Causes of delinquency. Berkeley: Univer- 5. Atiyah, P. S., & Summers, R. (1987). Form and substance in sity of California Press. Anglo-American law: A comparative study in legal reasoning, 97. Gottfredson, M., & Hirschi, T. (1990). A general theory of legal theory and legal institutions. Oxford, UK: Oxford Uni- crime. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press. versity Press; p. 97.

6. Robinson v. California, 370 U.S. 660 (1962). given 16-year term. Lawrence Journal-World. Retrieved from 7. U.S. Department of Justice. (1988). Report to the nation on http://www2.ljworld.com/news/2006/mar/04/childs crime and justice (2nd ed.). Washington, DC: Bureau of _killer_expresses_regret_hes_given_16year_te/. Justice Statistics; p. 16. 32. Jacobson v. United States, 503 U.S. 540, 548 (1992). 8. Hewitt, J. (1987, August). Gardeners shape a new future 33. Mathews v. United States, 485 U.S. 58, 63 (1988). for delinquents. China Reconstructs, 29–31. 34. Sherman v. United States, 356 U.S. 369 (1958). 9. California Penal Code, Section 211 35. United States v. Russell, 411 U.S. 423 (1973). 10. Colorado §18.4.401 36. American Law Institute, see note 14, Section 2.09.1. 11. Coghill, E. (2015). Man faces federal charges after trying 37. United States v. Cheek, 498 U.S. 192 (1994). to hire hitman to kill his wife. Retrieved from http://www 38. Jones, D. (1978). Crime and criminal responsibility. Chi- .wlky.com/news/man-faces-federal-charges-after-trying cago: Nelson-Hall; pp. 67–68. -to-hire-hitman-to-kill-wife/32353328. 39. Jones, see note 37, p. 68. 12. Orwell, G. (1981/1949). 1984. New York: Penguin. 40. Netto, J. (2016). Boy, 11, sentenced in shotgun murder 13. Holmes, O. W. (1881). The common law. Boston: Little, of 8-year-old girl in Tennessee. Retrieved from http:// Brown and Co.; p. 3. www.cnn.com/2016/02/05/us/tennessee-11-year-old 14. American Law Institute. (1962). Model Penal Code, pro- -sentenced-for-first-degree-murder. posed official draft (Section 2.02.1). Philadelphia: Ameri- 41. Grey, T. (1977). Procedural fairness and substantive rights. can Law Institute. In J. R. Pennock & J. Chapman (Eds.), Due process (p. 185). 15. Unze, D. (2014). Man to spend life in prison for kill- New York: New York University Press. ing teens in burglary. Retrieved from http://www.usa 42. State v. Hairston and Williams, 63 N.C. 439 (1869). today.com/story/news/nation/2014/04/29/minnesota 43. State v. Gibson, 36 Ind. 393 (1871). -homeowner-kills-teens/8480047/. 44. Hurtado v. California, 110 U.S. 516 (1884). 16. Liptak, A. (2006, August 7). 15 states expand right to 45. Adamson v. California, 332 U.S. 46 (1947). shoot in self-defense. New York Times. Retrieved from 46. Palko v. Connecticut, 302 U.S. 319 (1937). http://nytimes.com/2006/08/07/us/07shoot.html. 17. Farrington, B. (2016). Senate passes stand your ground extension, gun bills. Retrieved from http://www.wsvn Chapter 4 .com/story/31092041/senate-passes-stand-your-ground 1. Smith, B. (1941). Enforcement of the criminal law. Annals -expansion-gun-bills. of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 217, 18. American Law Institute, see note 14, Section 3.02.1. 12–18. 19. Johnson, K. (2004). Prosecutors drop Kobe Bryant rape 2. Smith, B. (1940). Police systems in the United States. New case. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/2004/09 York: Harper & Brothers. /02/national/02kobe.html; O’Driscoll, P. (2005, March 3. McCoy, C. (2010). Holding police accountable. New York: 2). Kobe Bryant, accuser settle her civil lawsuit. USA The Urban Institute Press; Commission to Combat Police Today. Retrieved from http://www.usatoday.com/sports Corruption. (2010). 12th annual report. New York: The /basketball/nba/2005-03-02-bryant-settles_x.htm. City of New York. Retrieved from http://www.nyc.gov 20. Steadman, H., & Braff, J. (1983). Defendants not guilty by /html/ccpc/assets/downloads/pdf/Twelfth-Annual reason of insanity. In J. Mohanan & H. Steadman (Eds.), -Report-February-2010.pdf; Johnson, K. (2007, Decem- Mentally disordered offenders (pp. 200–237). New York: Ple- ber 1). Police brutality cases on the rise since 9/11. USA num; Martin, J. (1998, February 27). The insanity defense: Today. Retrieved from http://www.usatoday.com/news/ A closer look. The Washington Post. Retrieved from http:// nation/2007-12-17-copmisconduct_n.htm; Kaelin, A. www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/local/longterm/aron (2009). The growing problem of police misconduct and /qa227.htm; Associated Press. (2005, January 4). Texas brutality. Retrieved from http://www.bukisa.com/articles lawmakers studying state’s insanity defense. Retrieved /104483_the-growing-problem-of-police-misconduct from http://www.demaction.org/dia/organizations/ncadp -and-brutality. /news.jsp?key=1080&t=; Bonnie, R. J. (2000). A case study 4. Steffens, L. (1931). The autobiography of Lincoln Steffens. in the insanity defense: The trial of John W. Hinkley, Jr. New New York: Harcourt, Brace; Lardner, J., & Reppetto, T. York: Foundation Press. (2000). Behind the NYPD’s blue wall of silence. New York: 21. Simon, R., & Aaronson, D. (1988). The insanity defense. Henry Holt. New York: Praeger. 5. Monkkonen, E. (1981). Policing in urban America, 1860– 22. M’Naghten’s Case, 8 Eng. Rep. 718 (H.I. 1843). 1920. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; Miller, 23. Parsons v. State, 81 Alabama 577 (1886). W. (1999). Cops and bobbies (2nd ed.). Columbus, OH: 24. Durham v. United States, 214 F.2d 862 (D.C. Cir. 1954). Ohio State University Press. 25. American Law Institute, see note 14, Section 4.01. 6. Reaves, B. A. (2011). Census of state and local law enforce- 26. Kaufman, I. (1982, August 8). The insanity plea on trial. ment agencies, 2008. Retrieved from http://www.bjs.gov The New York Times Magazine, p. 18. /content/pub/pdf/csllea08.pdf. 27. United States v. Brawner, 471 F.2d 969 (1972). 7. Reith, C. (1956). A new study of police history. Edinburgh, 28. U.S. Congress. (1984). The Comprehensive Crime Control UK: Oliver & Boyd. Act of 1984 (P.L. 98–473). Washington, DC: Author. 8. The discussion of English policing history is derived from: 29. Public Broadcasting Station. A Crime of Insanity: State Johnson, D. (1981). American law enforcement. St. Louis: Insanity Defense Laws.(2014). Retrieved from: http:// Forum Press; Richardson, J. (1970). The New York police. www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/crime/trial New York: Oxford University Press; Johnson, H. (1988). /states.html History of criminal justice. Cincinnati: Anderson; Uchida, 30. Klofas, J., & Yandrasits, J. (1988). “Guilty but mentally ill” C. (1989). The development of the American police. In and the jury trial: A case study. Criminal Law Bulletin, 24, 425. R. Dunham & G. P. Alpert (Eds.), Critical issues in policing 31. Weslander, E. (2005, November 2). Dillon plans ‘intox- (pp. 14–30). Prospect Heights, IL: Waveland Press. ication’ defense. Lawrence Journal-World. Retrieved from 9. Emsley, C. (1961). The English police. New York: Palgrave http://www2.ljworld.com/news/2005/nov/02/dillon Macmillan. _plans_intoxication_defense/?city_local; Weslander, E. 10. Lee, M. (1971). A history of police in England. Montclair, NJ: (2006, March 4). Child’s killer expresses regret as he’s Patterson Smith.

11. Gorski, R. (2003). The fourteenth century sheriff. Suffolk, 39. Saavedra, T. (2014, September 22) From batons to body UK: The Boydell Press; Lee, see note 10; Uchida, see note 8. cameras: the evolution of police technology. The Orange 12. Gorski, see note 11; Lee, see note 10; Uchida, see note 8. County Register. Retrieved from http://www.ocregister 13. Reynolds, E. (1998). Before the bobbies. Palo Alto, CA: Stan- .com/articles/police-635953-officers-policing.html. ford University Press. 40. National Institute of Justice. (2016, June 3). Research on 14. McMullan, J. (1996). The new improved money police. body-worn cameras and law enforcement. Retrieved from British Journal of Criminology, 36, 85–108. http://www.nij.gov/topics/law-enforcement/technology 15. Fielding, H., & Trumble, A. (2010). The history of the life of /pages/body-worn-cameras.aspx. the late Mr. Jonathan Wild the great. Charleston, SC: Nabu 41. Ready, J. T., & Young, J. T. (2015, June 14). The impact Press; Van Der Kiste, J. (2010). Jonathan Wild. London: of on-officer video cameras on police–citizen con- Amberley Publishing; Pringle, P. (1965). Hue and cry: The tacts: findings from a controlled experiment in Mesa, story of Henry and John Fielding and their Bow Street Runners. AZ. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 11(3), 445-458. New York: Morrow. Retrieved from http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007 16. Pringle, see note 15. /s11292-015-9237-8. 17. New Westminster Police Service. (n.d.). Sir Robert Peel’s 42. Walker & Katz, see note 21. nine principles. Retrieved from http://www.newwest 43. Mapp v. Ohio, 367 U.S. 643 (1961). police.org/peel.html. 44. Weeks v. United States, 232 U.S. 383 (1914). 18. Germann, A. C., Day, F., & Gallati, R. (1962). Introduction 45. Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 (1966). to law enforcement. Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas Pub- 46. Katz v. United States, 389 U.S. 347 (1967). lishers; Reith, see note 7. 47. Reaves, B. A. (2015). Local police departments, 2013: 19. Uchida, see note 8. Personnel, policies, and practices. Retrieved from http:// 20. Uchida, see note 8. www.bjs.gov/content/pub/pdf/lpd13ppp.pdf. 21. The discussion of American policing is derived from: 48. Skogan, W. (2006). The promise of community polic- Harris, A. (2004). Policing the city. Columbus, OH: Ohio ing. In D. Weisbund & A. Braga (Eds.), Policing innovation State University Press; Fogelson, R. (1977). Big-city police. (pp. 27–43). New York: Cambridge University Press. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; Goldstein, H. 49. Skolnick, J., & Bayley, D. (1988). Community policing. (1990). Problem-oriented policing. New York: McGraw-Hill; Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice. Johnson, H. (1988). History of criminal justice. Cincinnati: 50. Weisheit, R., Wells, L. E., & Falcone, D. (1994). Commu- Anderson; Klockars, C. (1985). The idea of policing. Beverly nity policing in small towns and rural America. Crime & Hills, CA: Sage; Lane, R. (1967). Policing the city. Cam- Delinquency, 40, 549–567. bridge, UK: Harvard University Press; Monkkonen, see 51. Decker, S. The rural country sheriff. Criminal Justice note 5; Miller, see note 5; Walker, S., & Katz, C. (2010). Review, 4, 105. The police in America (7th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill. 52. Weisheit, Wells, & Falcone, see note 44. 22. Johnson, see note 21; Lane, see note 21; Walker & Katz, 53. Goldstein, H. (1993). The new policing. Paper presented at see note 21. the National Institute of Justice Conference on Commu- 23. Zinn, H. (1980). A people’s history of America. New York: nity Policing; p. 5. Harper & Row. 54. Weisheit, Wells, & Falcone, see note 44, p. 556. 24. Uchida, see note 8. 55. Burton, O. (1993, May 31). While breaking the law, some- 25. Asbury, H. (1927). The gangs of New York. Garden City, NY: one may be watching. Law Enforcement News, 7. Garden City Publishing; p. 237. 56. Goldstein, see note 47. 26. Steffens, see note 4, p. 209. 57. Goldstein, see note 47, p. 33. 27. Perez, D., & Barkhurst, M. Paradoxes of leadership in police man- 58. Cordner, G., & Biebel, E. P. (2005). Problem-oriented agement (1st ed.). Independence, KY: Cengage Learning, 2011. policing in practice. Criminology and Public Policy, 4, 28. Berman, J. S. (1987). Police administration and progres- 155–180. sive reform. New York: Greenwood Press; p. 71. 59. Kelling, G., & Wilson, J. Q. (1982). Broken windows. 29. Uchida, see note 8. Atlantic Monthly, 249, 29–38. 30. Carte, G., & Carte, E. (1975). Police reform in the United 60. Kelling & Wilson, see note 53. States. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press. 61. Kelling & Wilson, see note 53. 31. Carte & Carte, see note 29. 62. Bratton, W. (1996). Remark: New strategies for combating 32. Berman, see note 27. crime in New York City. Fordham Urban Law Journal, 23, 33. Taylor, F. (1911). The principles of scientific management. 71–785. New York: Harper & Row. 63. Bratton, see note 56. 34. Carte & Carte, see note 29. 64. Kahn, D. (1997). Social influence, social meaning, and 35. NYPD. (2011, April 26). NYPD emergency service unit deterrence. Virginia Law Review, 83, 349–395. adds 44 new members. Retrieved from http://www.nyc 65. Harcourt, B. (1998). Reflecting on the subject. Michigan .gov/html/nypd/html/pr/pr_2011_04_26_esu_graduation Law Review, 97, 291–389. .shtml. 66. Kahn, see note 58. 36. Mijares, T., & McCarthy, R.M. The management of police spe- 67. Levitt, S. (2004). Understanding why crime fell in the cialized tactical units. Springfield: Charles C. Publishing, 1990s. Journal of Economic Perspective, 18, 163–190; Roe v. LTD, 2000. Wade, 410 U.S. 113 (1973). 37. Weisel, D. L., & Shelley, T.C. (2004). Specialized gang 68. Kelling, G., & Coles, C. (1996). Fixing broken windows. units: form and function in community policing. Final New York: The Free Press. Report to the National Institute of Justice. Retrieved from 69. Walker & Katz, see note 21. https://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/nij/grants/207204.pdf. 70. Walker & Katz, see note 21. 38. Bond, B. J., & Gabriele, K. R. (2016, January 21). Research 71. Bureau of Justice Statistics. (2010). Key facts at a glance: and planning units an innovation instrument in the Justice expenditure and employment extracts. Retrieved 21st-century police organization. Criminal Justice Policy from http://bjs.ojp.usdoj.gov/content/glance/exptyp.cfm; Review. Retrieved from http://cjp.sagepub.com/content Reaves, Census of state and local law enforcement agen- /early/2016/01/20/0887403415624947.abstract. cies, 2008, see note 6.

72. Reaves, Census of state and local law enforcement agen- 98. Interpol. (2011). About Interpol. Retrieved from http:// cies, 2008. www.interpol.int/public/icpo/default.asp; Fooner, M. 73. Reaves, Local police departments, see note 41; Reaves, (1989). Interpol. New York: Plenum Press; Bashfield, J. Census of state and local law enforcement agencies, 2008, (2004). Interpol. Milwaukee: World Almanac Library. see note 6. 99. Morn, F. (1982). The eye that never sleeps. Bloomington, 74. Reaves, Local police departments, see note 41. IN: Indiana University Press. 75. Reaves, Local police departments, see note 41. 100. U.S. Department of Justice. (2004). National policy summit: 76. See the New York City Police Department website: http:// Building private security/public policing partnerships to prevent www.nyc.gov/html/nypd/html/faq/faq_police.shtml#1. and respond to terrorism and public disorder. Washington, 77. Reaves, Local police departments, see note 41. DC: International Association of Chiefs of Police. 78. Reaves, Local police departments, see note 41. 101. Joh, E. (2004). The paradox of private policing. Journal of 79. Burch, A. M. (2012). Sheriff’s offices, 2007—Statistical Criminal Law and Criminology, 95, 49–131. tables. Retrieved from http://www.bjs.gov/content/pub 102. Strom, K., Berzofsky, M., Shook-Sa, B., Barrick, K., Daye, C., /pdf/so07st.pdf. Horstmann, N., & Kinsey, S. (2010). The private secu- 80. Brown, L. (1978). The role of sheriff. In A. Cohn (Ed.), rity industry: A review of the definitions, available data The future of policing (pp. 227–247). Beverly Hills, CA: sources, and paths moving forward. Retrieved from Sage; Brammer, D. (1968). A study of the office of the sheriff https://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/bjs/grants/232781.pdf. in the United States. Jackson, MS: University of Mississippi 103. Carter, J. C. (2007). Public-private partnerships: Vital Press. resources for law enforcement. The Police Chief, 74(9). 81. See the Los Angeles County Sheriff’s website: http://sheriff Retrieved from http://www.policechiefmagazine.org .lacounty.gov/wps/portal/lasd/family/. /magazine/index.cfm?fuseaction=display_arch&article 82. Burch, see note 73. _id=1257&issue_id=92007. 83. Reaves, Local police departments, see note 41. 104. Frost, B. (2000). The privatization and civilianization of 84. Reaves, Census of state and local law enforcement agen- policing. In C. Friel (Ed.), Criminal justice 2000: Boundary cies, 2008, see note 6. changes in criminal justice (pp. 19–79). Washington, DC: 85. Davis, R. C., Lombardo, M. E., Woods, D. J., Koper, C., National Institute of Justice; Benson, B. L. (2001). The & Hawkins, C. (2014). Civilian staff in policing: An countervailing trend to FBI failure: A return to privatized assessment of the 2009 Byrne Civilian Hiring Program. police services. Retrieved from http://www.independent Retrieved from https://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/nij/grants .org/newsroom/article.asp?id=389; Reaves, Local police /246952.pdf. departments, see note 41, p. 2. 86. Reaves, Census of state and local law enforcement agen- 105. The discussion of private security is derived from: Dempsey, cies, 2008, see note 6. J. (2010). Introduction to private security (2nd ed.). Florence, 87. Utley, R. (2002). Lone star justice. New York: Oxford Uni- KY: Cengage Learning; Hess, K. (2008). Introduction to private versity Press; Robinson, C. (2001). The men who wear the security (5th ed.). Florence, KY: Cengage Learning; Nemeth, star. New York: Modern Library. C. (2004). Private security and the law (3rd ed.). St. Louis: 88. The Pennsylvania state police. (1910, February 28). The New Butterworth-Heinemann; Fischer, R., Halibozek, E., & York Time. Retrieved from http://select.nytimes.com/mem Walters, D. (2008). Introduction to security (8th ed.). St. Louis: /archive/pdf?res=FB0E10FC3F5417738DDDA10A94DA Butterworth-Heinemann; Cunningham, W., Strauchs, J., & 405B808DF1D3. Van Meter, C. (1990). Private security trends, 1970–2000: The 89. Burch, see note 73. Hallcrest Report 2. Woburn, MA: Butterworth-Heinemann. 90. Hughes, T. (2010, September 17). Free-speech ruling gives U.S. parks pause. USA Today, p. 3A. 91. Reaves, Federal law enforcement officers, 2008, see note Chapter 5 6; Hughes, K. (2006). Justice expenditure and employment in 1. Mydans, S. (1994, June 2). Punitive damages denied in the United States, 2003. Washington, DC: U.S. Department beating of Rodney King. The New York Times. Retrieved of Justice. from http://www.nytimes.com/1994/06/02/us/punitive 92. The discussion of U.S. marshals is derived from: http:// -damages-denied-in-beating-of-rodney-king.html. www.usdoj.gov/marshals/; Chenowith, J. (2004). Down 2. Ornelas v. United States, 517 U.S. 690 (1996). darkness wide. Frederick, MD: Publish America; Sommer, 3. The ‘Lectric Law Library. (n.d.). Probable cause. Retrieved R. S. (1993). A history of U.S. marshals. Philadelphia: Run- from http://www.lectlaw.com/def2/p089.htm. ning Press. 4. Handler, J. (1993). Ballentine’s law dictionary. Florence, KY: 93. U.S. Secret Service. (2010). Frequently asked questions. Cengage Learning. Retrieved from http://www.secretservice.gov/about/faqs/; 5. Payton v. New York, 445 U.S. 573 (1980); Cohen, W. Melanson, P., & Stevens, P. (2005). Secret service. New (2005). Constitutional law. (12th ed.). Belmont, CA: Foun- York: Carroll and Graf. dation Press. 94. U.S. Postal Inspection Service. (n.d.). Mission statement. 6. Weeks v. United States, 232 U.S. 383 (1914). Retrieved from https://postalinspectors.uspis.gov/aboutus 7. Elkins v. United States, 364 U.S. 206 (1960). /mission.aspx; U.S. Postal Service. (2011). Postal facts. 8. Mapp v. Ohio, 367 U.S. 643 (1961). http://www.usps.com/communications/newsroom/post 9. Linkletter v. Walker, 381 U.S. 618 (1965). alfacts.htm; Makris, J. (1959). The silent investigators. Bos- 10. Nix v. Williams, 467 U.S. 431 (1984). ton: E.P. Dutton. 11. United States v. Leon, 468 U.S. 897 (1984); also see the com- 95. U.S. Postal Inspection Service. (2015). Annual report FY panion case: Massachusetts v. Sheppard, 468 U.S. 981 (1984). 2015. Retrieved from https://postalinspectors.uspis.gov 12. Hudson v. Michigan, 547 U.S. 1096 (2006). /radDocs/pubs/2015_AnnualReport.pdf. 13. Virginia v. Moore, 553 U.S. 164 (2008). 96. Federal Bureau of Investigation. (n.d.). Quick facts. 14. Herring v. United States, 555 U.S. 135 (2009). Retrieved from http://www.fbi.gov/quickfacts.htm. 15. Chimel v. California, 395 U.S. 752 (1969). 97. Federal Bureau of Investigation, see note 90. 16. Chimel v. California, see note 14.

17. New York v. Belton, 453 U.S. 454 (1981). 66. Edwards v. Arizona, 451 U.S. 477 (1981). 18. Thornton v. United States, 514 U.S. 615 (2004). 67. Davis v. United States, 114 S. Ct. 2350 (1994). 19. Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1 (1968). 68. Maryland v. Shantzer, No. 08-680 (2010). 20. Terry v. Ohio, see note 18. 69. New York v. Quarles, 467 U.S. 649 (1984). 21. United States v. Sokolow, 490 U.S. 1 (1989). 70. Arizona v. Roberson, 486 U.S. 675 (1988). 22. United States v. Robinson, 414 U.S. 218 (1973). 71. Minnick v. Mississippi, 498 U.S. 146 (1990). 23. United States v. Arvizu, 534 U.S. 266 (2002). 72. Dickerson v. United States, 530 U.S. 428 (2000). 24. Cloud, M. (1985). Search and seizure by the numbers. 73. Berghuis v. Tompkins, No. 08-1470 (2010). Boston University Law Review, 65, 843–921; Robin, G. 74. Schmerber v. California, 384 U.S. 757 (1966); United States (1993). Inquisitive cops, investigative stops, and drug v. Dionisio, 410 U.S. 1 (1973); United States v. Mara, 410 courier hops. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 9, U.S. 19 (1973); Gilbert v. California, 388 U.S. 263 (1967); 41–49. United States v. Wade, 388 U.S. 218 (1967); United States v. 25. Florida v. Royer, 460 U.S. 491 (1983). Euge, 444 U.S. 707 (1980). 26. Carroll v. United States, 267 U.S. 132 (1925). 75. United States v. Wade, see note 73. 27. United States v. Ross, 456 U.S. 798 (1982). 76. Kirby v. Illinois, 406 U.S. 682 (1972). 28. California v. Acevedo, 500 U.S. 565 (1991). 77. Simmons v. United States, 390 U.S. 377 (1968); Neil v. Big- 29. Illinois v. Cabelles, 543 U.S. 405 (2005). gers, 409 U.S. 188 (1972). 30. Delaware v. Prouse, 440 U.S. 648 (1978). 78. Beating nullifies conviction. (1991, July 6). Seattle Times, 31. United States v. Antoine Jones, 565 U.S._(2012). pp. A1, 12. 32. Harris v. United States, 390 U.S. 234 (1968). 79. Hopt v. Utah, 110 U.S. 574 (1884). 33. Hester v. United States, 265 U.S. 57 (1924); Oliver v. United 80. Wilson v. United States, 162 U.S. 613 (1896). States, 466 U.S. 170 (1984); Florida v. Riley, 488 U.S. 445 81. Brown v. Mississippi, 297 U.S. 278 (1936). (1989). 82. Chambers v. Florida, 309 U.S. 227 (1940). 34. Schneckloth v. Bustamonte, 412 U.S. 218 (1973). 83. Blackburn v. Alabama, 361 U.S. 199 (1960). 35. Florida v. Bostick, 501 U.S. 429 (1991). 84. McNabb v. United States, 318 U.S. 332 (1943). 36. Bond v. United States, 529 U.S. 334 (2000). 85. Mallory v. United States, 354 U.S. 449 (1957). 37. Georgia v. Randolph, 547 U.S. 103 (2006). 86. Levy, L., Karst, K., & Mahoney, D. (2000). Encyclopedia of 38. Illinois v. Rodriguez, 497 U.S. 177 (1990); United States v. the American Constitution (2nd ed.). New York: Macmillan Matlock, 415 U.S. 164 (1974). Reference Books. 39. California v. Greenwood, 486 U.S. 35 (1988). 87. Gideon v. Wainwright, 372 U.S. 335 (1963). 40. California v. Greenwood, see note 39. 88. Argersinger v. Hamlin, 407 U.S. 25 (1972). 41. Almeida-Sanchez v. United States, 413 U.S. 266 (1973); 89. Escobedo v. Illinois, see note 59. United States v. Brignoni-Ponce, 422 U.S. 873 (1975); United States v. Ortiz, 422 U.S. 891 (1975). 42. United States v. Martinez-Fuerte, 428 U.S. 543 (1976). Chapter 6 43. United States v. Flores-Montano, 541 U.S. 149 (2004). 1. Lubin, G. The 15 most dangerous jobs in America. Business 44. Olmstead v. United States, 277 U.S. 438 (1928). Insider. Retrieved from http://www.businessinsider.com/ 45. Communications Act of 1934. Retrieved from http:// the-15-most-dangerous-jobs-in-america-2010-3#no-10- www.fcc.gov/Reports/1934new.pdf. police-and-sheriffs-patrol-officers-7; Achenbach, J., Wan, 46. Katz v. United States, 389 U.S. 347 (1967). W., Berman, M., & Balingit, M. (2016). Five Dallas police 47. Kyllo v. United States, 533 U.S. 27 (2001). officers were killed by a lone attacker; authorities say. 48. Michigan Department of State Police v. Sitz, 496 U.S. 444 The Washington Post. Retrieved from https://www.wash (1990). ingtonpost.com/news/morning-mix/wp/2016/07/08 49. United States v. Leon, see note 11. /like-a-little-war-snipers-shoot-11-police-officers-during 50. Screws v. United States, 325 U.S. 91 (1945). -dallas-protest-march-killing-five/. 51. Malley v. Briggs, 475 U.S. 335 (1986). 2. Federal Bureau of Investigation. (2014). Crime in the 52. Heimbach v. Village of Lyons, 597 F2d 344 (2d Cir 1979); United States, 2014. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Stump v. Sparkman, 435 U.S. 349 (1978); Pierson v. Ray, Justice. Retrieved from https://www.fbi.gov/about-us/cjis 386 U.S. 547 (1967). /ucr/crime-in-the-u.s/2014/crime-in-the-u.s.-2014. 53. Cohen, see note 5. 3. Bronitt, S. H., & Stenning, P. (2011). Understanding dis- 54. United States v. Watson, 423 U.S. 411 (1976); United States cretion in modern policing. Criminal Law Journal, 35(6), v. Santana, 427 U.S. 38 (1976). 319–332. 55. Payton v. New York, see note 5. 4. Federal Bureau of Investigation, see note 2. 56. Minnesota v. Olson, 495 U.S. 91 (1990). 5. Hickman, M., & Reaves, B. (2006). Local police departments, 57. Atwater v. Lago Vista, 532 U.S. 318 (2001); Gearan, A. 2003. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice; Myers, (2001). Police can arrest for minor offenses. Retrieved from S. (2004). Police encounters with juvenile suspects: Explain- http://abcnews.go.com/US/story?id=93495&page=1. ing the use of authority and provision of support. Washington, 58. Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 (1966). DC: National Institute of Justice. Retrieved from https:// 59. State v. Miranda, 401 P.2nd 721 (1965). www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/nij/grants/205124.pdf. 60. Escobedo v. Illinois, 378 U.S. 478 (1964). 6. Myers, see note 5. 61. Davies, D. (1967, February 25). Second rape conviction 7. Terry, R. (1967). Discrimination in the handling of for Miranda. Arizona Republic, pp. 1A, 4A; Baker, L. (1983). juvenile offenders by social-control agencies. Journal of Miranda: Crime, law and politics. New York: Atheneum. Research in Crime and Delinquency, 4, 218–230; Black, D., 62. Baker, see note 60. & Reiss, A. (1970). Police control of juveniles. American 63. Graham, F. (1966, June 14). High court puts new curb on Sociological Review, 35, 63–77. powers of the police to interrogate suspects. The New York 8. Kochel, T. R., Wilson, D. B., & Mastrofski, S. D. (2011). Times, p. A1. Effect of suspect race on officers’ arrest decisions. Criminol- 64. Miranda v. Arizona, see note 57. ogy, 49(2). Retrieved from http://kroesler.com/citations/ 65. Brewer v. Williams, 430 U.S. 387 (1977). Kochel-2011.pdf.

9. Goldman, N. (1963). The differential selection of juvenile 32. Allen, T. (2005). Taking a juvenile into custody: Situa- offenders for court appearance. New York: National Council tional factors that influence police officers’ decisions. Jour- on Crime and Delinquency. nal of Sociology and Social Welfare, 32, 121–129. 10. Myers, see note 5. 33. Federal Bureau of Investigation. (2015). 2014 crime 11. Farrell, R., & Swigert, L. (1978). Prior offense record as in the United States. Retrieved from https://www a self-fulfilling prophecy. Law and Society Review, 12, .fbi.gov/about-us/cjis/ucr/crime-in-the-u.s/2014/crime 437–453; Kochel, see note 8. -in-the-u.s.-2014/tables/table-33. 12. Brown, R. (2005). Black, white, and unequal: Examining 34. Novak, K., Frank, J., Smith, B., & Engel, R. (2002). Revis- situational determinants of arrest decisions from police– iting the decision to arrest: Comparing beat and commu- suspect encounters. Criminal Justice Studies, 18, 51–68. nity officers. Crime & Delinquency, 48, 70–98; McCord, J., 13. Ericson, R. (1982). Reproducing order. Toronto: University Widom, C., & Crowell, N. (2001). Juvenile crime/juvenile of Toronto Press. justice. Washington, DC: National Academies Press, p. 245. 14. Piliavin, I., & Briar, S. (1964). Police encounters with juve- 35. Monahan, T. (1970). Police dispositions of juvenile niles. American Journal of Sociology, 70, 206–214. offenders. Phylon, 31, 91–107. 15. Piliavin & Briar, see note 14, p. 210. 36. Armstrong, G. (1977). Females under the law: Protected 16. Dunham, R., & Alpert, G. (2009). Officer and suspect but unequal. Crime & Delinquency, 23, 109–120; Chesney- demeanor. Police Quarterly, 12, 6–21. Lind, M. (1970). Judicial paternalism and the female status 17. Raab, S. (1993, September 28). Former policeman tells of offender. Crime & Delinquency, 23, 121–130; Horowitz, R., & corruption. The New York Times, pp. 1A, 15A; Black, D. Pottieger, A. (1991). Gender bias in juvenile justice (1980). The manners and customs of the police. New York: handling of seriously crime-involved youth. Journal of Academic Press. Research in Crime and Delinquency, 28, 75–100. 18. LaFraniere, S., & Lehren, A. W. (2015, October 24). 37. Visher, C. (1983). Gender, police arrest decisions, and The disproportionate risks of driving while black. The notions of chivalry. Criminology, 21, 5–28. New York Times. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes 38. Smith, D., & Visher, C. (1981). Street-level justice. Social .com/2015/10/25/us/racial-disparity-traffic-stops-driv Problems, 29, 167–177; Mastrofski, S., Worden, R., & ing-black.html?_r=0. Snipes, J. (1995). Law enforcement in a time of com- 19. Langton, L., & Durose, M. (2013). Police behavior during munity policing. Criminology, 33, 539–563; Bachman, R. traffic and street stops, 2011. U.S. Department of Justice, (1996). Victims’ perceptions of initial police responses Bureau of Justice Statistics. Retrieved from http://www.bjs to robbery and aggravated assault. Journal of Quantita- .gov/content/pub/pdf/pbtss11.pdf. tive Criminology, 12, 363–390; Huizinga, D., & Elliott, 20. Rivera, R. (2002, August 15). Pockets of city see higher use D. (1987). Juvenile offenders. Crime & Delinquency, 33, of force during police stops. The New York Times. Retrieved 206–223. from http://www.nytimes.com/2012/08/16/nyregion/in 39. Ferdinand, T. (1980). Police attitudes and police organiza- -police-stop-data-pockets-where-force-is-used-more-of tion. Police Studies, 3, 46–60. ten.html. 40. Lanza-Kaduce, L., & Greenleaf, R. (2000). Age and race 21. Kochel et al., see note 8; Lytle, D. J. (2014). The effects of deference reversals. Journal of Research in Crime and Delin- suspect characteristics on arrest: A meta-analysis. Journal of quency, 37, 221–236; Crawford, C., & Burns, R. (2002). Criminal Justice, 42(6), 589–597; http://onlinelibrary.wiley Resisting arrest. Police Practice and Research, 3, 105–117. .com/doi/10.1111/j.1745-9125.2011.00230.x/abstract; 41. Smith, D., & Klein, J. (1984). Police control of interper- jsessionid=22D7E6BC6FF3BB16C1E15AAB3AC74C67 sonal disputes. Social Problems, 31, 468–481. .f02t03. Exploring Criminal Justice—Collected Notes.docx. 42. Bodine, G. (1964). Factors related to police dispositions 22. Engel, R. S., Sobol, J. J., & Worden, R. E. (2000). Further of juvenile offenders. Paper presented at the annual meet- exploration of the demeanor hypothesis: The interaction ing of the American Sociological Association. effects of suspects’ characteristics and demeanor on police 43. Fyfe, J. (1979). Administrative interventions on police behavior. Justice Quarterly, 17(2), 235–258. shooting discretion. Journal of Criminal Justice, 7, 309–323. 23. Myers, see note 6. 44. Alpert, G. (1997). Police pursuits. Washington, DC: U.S. 24. Smith, D., & Visher, C. (1981). Street level justice. Social Department of Justice. Problems, 29, 167–178; Black, D. (1980). The manners and 45. Wilson, J. Q. (1968). Varieties of police behavior. Cam- customs of the police. New York: Academic Press. bridge, MA: Harvard University Press. 25. Brooks, L. (2001). Police discretionary behavior. In 46. Reiss, A. (1992). Police organization in the twentieth R. Dunham & G. Alpert (Eds.), Critical issues in policing (4th century. In M. Tonry & N. Morris (Eds.), Modern policing ed., pp. 117–131). Prospect Heights, IL: Waveland Press; (pp. 51–97). Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Riksheim, E., & Chermak, S. (1993). Causes of police 47. Walker, S., & Katz, C. (2011). The police in America (7th behavior revisited. Journal of Criminal Justice, 21, 353–382. ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill. 26. Walker, S., Spohn, C., & DeLone, M. (2006). The color of 48. Engel, R., Sobol, J., & Worden, R. (2000). Further explo- justice (4th ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth. ration of the demeanor hypothesis. Justice Quarterly, 17, 27. Boydstun, J. (1975). San Diego field interrogation. Wash- 249. ington, DC: The Police Foundation; Sampson, R. (1986). 49. Metro-Dade Police Department. (1984). Guidelines and Effects of socioeconomic context on official reaction to instructions in high-speed pursuits. Miami: City of Miami. juvenile delinquency. American Sociological Review, 51, 50. Hickman & Reaves, see note 5; Jennings, W., & Hudak, 876–885. E. (2005). Police response to persons with mental ill- 28. Black & Reiss, see note 7. ness. In R. Dunham & G. Alpert (Eds.), Critical issues in 29. Federal Bureau of Investigation, see note 2. policing (5th ed., pp. 115–128). Long Grove, IL: Waveland 30. Brooks, see note 25; Sherman, L. (1985). Causes of police Press. behavior. In A. Blumberg (Ed.), The ambivalent force (3rd 51. Walker & Katz, see note 47. ed., pp. 183–195). New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston. 52. Manning, P. (1992). Information technologies and the 31. Werthman, C., & Piliavin, I. (1967). Gang members and police. In M. Tonry & N. Morris (Eds.), Modern policing the police. In D. Bordua (Ed.), The police (pp. 56–98). (pp. 349–398). Chicago: University of Chicago Press. New York: John Wiley & Sons. 53. Walker & Katz, see note 47.

54. Roebuck, J., & Barker, T. (1974). A typology of police cor- 78. Collins, A. (1998). Shielded from justice. New York: Human ruption. Social Problems, 21, 423–437. Rights Watch. 55. Kleinig, J. (2002). Rethinking noble cause corruption. 79. CNN. Rampart scandal. Retrieved from http://edition.cnn International Journal of Police Science and Management, 4, .com/2001/LAW/11/08/lapd.corruption.scandal/?urls=. 287–314. 80. Independent Commission on the Los Angeles Police 56. Chicago Crime Commission. (n.d.). Mission & over- Department. (1991). Report of the Independent Commission view. Retrieved from http://www.chicagocrimecommis on the Los Angeles Police Department. Los Angeles: Author. sion.org/content.aspx?page_id=22&club_id=783436& 81. Department of Justice. (2015). Justice Department module_id=138494. Announces Findings of Two Civil Rights Investigations 57. Wickersham, W. (1931). Enforcement of prohibition. Wash- in Ferguson, Missouri. Retrieved from https://www ington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office. .justice.gov/opa/pr/justice-department-announces-find 58. Asbury, H. (1927). The gangs of New York. Garden City, NY: ings-two-civil-rights-investigations-ferguson-missouri. Garden City Publishing; Costello, A. (1985). Our police 82. Terrill, W., & Mastrofski, S. (2002). Situational and offi- protectors. New York: C.F. Roper; Ellis, E. (1966). The epic cer-based determinants of police coercion. Justice Quar- of New York City. New York: Coward-McCann; Morris, L. terly, 19, 215–248; Garner, J., & Maxwell, C. (2002). (1951). Incredible New York. New York: Bonanza; Report of Understanding the use of force by and against the police in six the special committee appointed to investigate the police depart- jurisdictions. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice. ment of the City of New York. (1895). Albany: State of New 83. Alpert, G., Dunham, R., & Stroshine, M. (2006). Policing. York; Richardson, J. (1970). The New York police. New York: Long Grove, IL: Waveland Press. Oxford University Press; Sifakis, C. (1982). The encyclope- 84. Terrill and Mastrofski, see note 82; Garner and Maxwell, dia of American crime. New York: Facts on File; Steffens, L. see note 82. (1931). The autobiography of Lincoln Steffens. New York: 85. Terrill and Mastrofski, see note 82; National Center for Harcourt Brace. Women and Policing. (2002). Men, women, and police 59. Mollen, M. (1994). Commission to investigate allegations excessive force. Los Angeles: Author; Independent Commis- of police corruption and the anti-corruption procedures of the sion on the Los Angeles Police Department, see note 80; police department. New York: Mollen Commission. Kappeler, V. (2006). Critical issues in police civil liability (4th 60. Raab, see note 17; Police corruption. (1994, July 12). USA ed.). Long Grove, IL: Longman Press. Today, p. 3A. 86. Kappeler, see note 85. 61. Mollen, see note 59, p. 2. 87. Johnson, K. (2007, December 18). Police brutality cases 62. Lee, H., Lim, H., Moore, D. D., Kim, J. (2013). How police up 25%; Union worried over dip in hiring standards. organizational structure correlates with frontline officers’ USA Today, p. 1A; Federal Bureau of Investigation. (2003). attitudes toward corruption: A multilevel model. Police Police brutality. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Jus- Practice and Research, 14(5). Retrieved from http://www tice. Retrieved from http://fbilibrary.fbiacademy.edu/ .tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/15614263.2011 bibliographies/policebrutality.htm; McCoy, C. (2010). .635483. Holding police accountable. Washington, DC: Urban Insti- 63. Sherman, L. (1978). Scandal and reform. Berkeley, CA: Uni- tute Press; Komp, C. (2006, June 27). Justice dept. reports versity of California Press. inaction on police brutality. The New Standard. Retrieved 64. Raab, see note 17. from http://newstandardnews.net/content/index.cfm/ 65. Chambliss, W. The police and organized vice in a western items/3343. city. In L. Sherman (Ed.), Police corruption (p. 160). New 88. Federal Bureau of Investigation. (2006). Supplementary York: Doubleday. homicide reports, 1976–2004. Washington, DC: Bureau of 66. Chambliss, see note 65, pp. 168–169. Justice Statistics. 67. Rayman, G. (2010, May 4). The NYPD tapes: Inside Bed- 89. Geller, W., & Toch, H. (2005). Police violence. New Haven, Stuy’s 81st precinct. The Village Voice. Retrieved from http:// CT: Yale University Press; Geller, W., & Karales, K. (1981). www.villagevoice.com/2010-05-04/news/the-nypd-tapes Shootings of and by Chicago police. Chicago: Law Enforce- -inside-bed-stuy-s-81st-precinct/. ment Study Group, p. 56. 68. Lee et al., see note 62. 90. Tennessee v. Garner, 471 U.S. 1 (1985). 69. Mollen, see note 59, p. 53. 91. Tennessee v. Garner, 471 U.S. 1 (1985). 70. Westley, W. (1953). Violence and the police. American 92. Tennessee v. Garner, 471 U.S. 1 (1985). Journal of Sociology, 59, 34–41; Raab, see note 17; Walker & 93. Tennessee v. Garner, 471 U.S. 1 (1985). Katz, see note 47. 94. Higgs, R. (2015). State panel sets guidelines on police 71. Mollen, see note 59, p. 59. use of force, focusing on preserving life. Cleveland.com 72. Williamson, F. (1973, January 16). Her majesty’s inspector Retrieved from http://www.cleveland.com/open/index of constabulary, retired. Guardian, 14; Lee et al., see note .ssf/2015/08/state_panel_sets_guidelines_on.html. 62; Lee, et al. (2013) How police organizational structure 95. Federal Bureau of Investigation, see note 88. correlates with frontline officers’ attitudes toward corrup- 96. Johnson, M.A. (2014). Georgia cop who killed teen was tion: a multilevel model, Police Practice and Research: An fired from previous police job. NBC News. Retrieved from International Journal, 14, 386–401. Retrieved from http:// http://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/georgia-cop- www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/15614263.2011 who-killed-teen-was-fired-previous-police-job-n44491. .635483. 97. Fyfe, J. (1978). Reducing the use of deadly force. In Police 73. Mollen, see note 59. use of deadly force (p. 29). Washington, DC: U.S. Depart- 74. Bittner, E. (1980). The functions of the police in modern soci- ment of Justice. ety. Cambridge, MA: Oleschalager, Gunn, and Hain. 98. Fyfe, J. (1988). Police use of deadly force. Justice Quarterly, 75. National Institute of Justice. (n.d.). Police use of force. 5, 165–205; Geller, W. (1992). Deadly force. Washington, Retrieved from http://www.nij.gov/topics/law-enforce DC: Police Executive Research Forum; Milton, C., Halleck, ment/officer-safety/use-of-force/pages/welcome.aspx. J., Lardner, J., & Albrecht, G. (1977). Police use of deadly 76. Bittner, E. (1970). The functions of the police in modern soci- force. Washington, DC: Police Foundation; Brown, J., & ety. Rockville, MD: National Institute of Mental Health, Langan, P. (2001). Policing and homicide, 1976–98: Justi- pp. 36–47. fiable homicide by police, police officers murdered by felons. 77. Wickersham, see note 57. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.

99. Matulia, K. (1985). A balance of forces (2nd ed.). Gaithers- 122. Worden, A. P. (1993). The attitudes of women and men in burg, MD: International Association of Chiefs of Police. policing. Criminology, 31, 203–242. 100. Fyfe, see note 98; Geller, see note 98; Amnesty Interna- 123. Myers, G. (1995). A municipal mother. Corvallis, OR: Ore- tional. (2015). Deadly force: Police use of lethal force gon State University Press. in the United States. Retrieved from https://www.amnes 124. International Association of Women Police. (n.d.). Focus tyusa.org/sites/default/files/aiusa_deadlyforcereport on IAWP campaigns. Retrieved from http://www.iawp june2015.pdf. .org/campaigns/HT/index.htm. 101. Fyfe, J. (1981). Who shoots. Journal of Police Science and 125. Clements, P. (2008). Policing a diverse society (2nd ed.). Administration, 9, 367–382. New York: Oxford University Press; Wells, S., & Alt, B. 102. Hoffman, P., & Hickey, E. (2005). Use of force by female (2005). Police women. New York: Praeger; Harrington, P. police officers. Journal of Criminal Justice, 33, 145–151. History of women in policing. Retrieved from http:// 103. Associated Press. Study examines police use of deadly womenandpolicing.com/history/index.asp. force. CBSNEWS. Retrieved from http://www.cbsnews 126. President’s Commission on Law Enforcement and Admin- .com/stories/2007/10/11/national/main3359288.shtml. istration of Justice. (1967). The challenge of crime in a free 104. Kindy, K., Fisher, M., Tate, J., & Jenkins, J. (2015, Decem- society. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office. ber 26). A year of reckoning: Police fatally shoot nearly 127. President’s Commission, see note 126. 1,000. Retrieved from http://www.washingtonpost.com 128. Federal Bureau of Investigation. (2014). Crime in the /sf/investigative/2015/12/26/a-year-of-reckoning-police United States 2013. Retrieved from https://www.fbi -fatally-shoot-nearly-1000/. .gov/about-us/cjis/ucr/crime-in-the-u.s/2013/crime-in-the 105. Hickman, M., Piquero, A., & Garner, J. (2008). Toward a -u.s.-2013/tables/table-74/table_74_full_time_law_ national estimate of police use of nonlethal force. Crimi- enforcement_employees_by_population_group_percent nology & Public Policy, 7, 563–604. _male_and_female_2013.xls. 106. Associated Press, see note 103. 129. Archbold, C., & Schulz, D. M. (2008). Making rank. Police 107. Federal Bureau of Investigation, see note 2; Sherman, M. Quarterly, 11 , 50–73. (2007, February 24). High-speed chase reaches supreme 130. Ritchie, M. (2009, September 19). U.S. has 212 female court. USA Today. Retrieved from http://www.usatoday police chiefs, still a vast minority. Chicago Tribune. .com/news/washington/judicial/2007-02-24-police-chase Retrieved from http://www.policeone.com/chiefs-sheriffs -case_x.htm. /articles/1888050-U-S-has-212-female-police-chiefs 108. Frank, T. (2015). High-speed police chases have killed -still-a-vast-minority/; National Center for Women and thousands of innocent bystanders. Retrieved from http:// Policing. (2002). Equality denied: The status of women www.usatoday.com/story/news/2015/07/30/police in policing 2001. Retrieved from http://www.womenand -pursuits-fatal-injuries/30187827. policing.org/PDF/2002_Status_Report.pdf. 109. Adams, S. (2010). Vehicle Pursuits: Legal Issues of Police 131. Worden, A. (1993). The attitudes of women and men Pursuits. Retrieved from http://www.cji.edu/site/assets in policing. Criminology, 31, 203–242; Sichel, J. (1978). /files/1921/vehiclepursuits.pdf. Women on patrol. Washington, DC: U.S. Government 110. Hill, J. (2002, July). High-speed police pursuits. FBI Law Printing Office. Enforcement Bulletin, pp. 1–5. 132. Homant, R., & Kennedy, D. (1985). Police perceptions of 111. Cabrera, G. (2004). Police pursuit policies in other jurisdic- spouse abuse. Journal of Criminal Justice, 13, 29–47. tions. San Francisco: City of San Francisco Government. 133. Abel, R. (2006). The black shields. Bloomington, IN: 112. Cabrera, see note 111. AuthorHouse; National Black Police Association. (n.d.). 113. Travis v. City of Mesquite, 830 S.W.2d 94 (1992). Home page. Retrieved from http://www.blackpolice.org; 114. Sacramento v. Lewis, 523 U.S. 833 (1998); Indianapolis v. Kuykendall, J., & Burns, D. (1980). The black officer. Jour- Garman, 49S00-0602-CV-55 (2006); Corcoran, K. (2006, nal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 1, 103–113. June 15). Bystanders can sue police over chases. The Indi- 134. Reaves, B. A. (2015). Local police departments, 2013: Per- anapolis Star, p. 1A; Scott v. Harris, 550 U.S. 372 (2007). sonnel, policies, and practices. U.S. Department of Justice, 115. Kerley, K. (2005). The costs of protecting and serv- Bureau of Justice Statistics. Retrieved from http://www ing. In H. Copes (Ed.), Policing and stress (pp. 73–86). .bjs.gov/content/pub/pdf/lpd13ppp.pdf; Retrieved from Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall; Huffington Post. http://factfinder.census.gov/faces/tableservices/jsf/pages/ (2012, July 15). Police officers may face added health productview.xhtml?src=CF risk: Study. Retrieved from http://www.huffingtonpost 135. New York City Civilian Complaint Review Board. Status .com/2012/07/15/police-health-risks-sleep-metabolic report, January–December 2009. Retrieved from http:// -syndrome-shift-work_n_1665979.html. www.nyc.gov/html/ccrb/downloads/pdf/ccrbann2009.pdf. 116. Lord, V. (1992). Changes in social support sources of new law 136. Fyfe, see note 98. enforcement officers. Doctoral dissertation, North Carolina 137. Reiss, A. (1968). Police brutality—answers to key ques- State University. tions. Transaction, 5, 10–19. 117. Crank, J., & Caldero, M. (1991). The production of occu- 138. Reaves, see note 134, Homant, see note 132. pational stress in medium-sized police agencies. Journal of 139. Griggs v. Duke Power Company, 401 U.S. 424 (1971); Albe- Criminal Justice, 19, 339–349. marle Paper Co. v. Moody, 422 U.S. 405 (1975). 118. Donlon-Cotton, C. (2007). How dangerous is that 140. United States v. Paradise, 480 U.S. 149 (1987). reporter? Law and Order, 55, 20–22; Dowler, K., & Zawilski, V. (2007). Public perceptions of police misconduct and discrimination: Examining the impact of media Chapter 7 consumption. Journal of Criminal Justice, 35, 193–203. 1. Johnson, H. (1988). History of criminal justice. Cincinnati: 119. Kerley, see note 115. Anderson; pp. 82–84. 120. Stevens, D. (1999). Police officer stress. Law and Order, 2. Marbury v. Madison, 1 Cr. 137 (1803). 47(9), 77–81; Copes, H. (2005). Policing and stress. Upper 3. Fletcher v. Peck, 6 Cr. 87 (1810). Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall. 4. Carp, R., & Stidham, R. (1985). The federal courts. Wash- 121. Kappeler, V., & Potter, G. (2004). The mythology of the crim- ington, DC: Congressional Quarterly. inal justice system (4th ed.). Prospect Heights, IL: Waveland 5. Langton, L., & Cohen, T. (2007). State court organization, Press. 1987–2004. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.

6. National Center for Courts. (2014). State trial court case- of Justice. (2009). Federal justice statistics 2006: Statistical loads, 2014. Williamsburg, VA: National Center for State tables. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice; Levin, Courts. D. (2008). Pretrial release of Latino defendants. Washington, 7. National Center for Courts, see note 6. DC: Pretrial Justice Institute. 8. Administrative Office of the United States Courts. (2014). 34. Hall, A. (1984). Pretrial release program options. Washing- Judicial business of the United States Courts, 2014. Washing- ton, DC: National Institute of Justice; pp. 32–33. ton, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office. 35. Pub. Law 89-465, 89th Cong. S. 1357, 80 Stat. 214. 9. Administrative Office of the United States Courts, see 36. Goldkamp, J., & Gottfredson, M. (1984). Judicial guidelines note 8. for bail: The Philadelphia experiment. Washington, DC: U.S. 10. Supreme Court of the United States. (2015). 2015 year- Department of Justice; Goldkamp, J., & White, M. (2001). end report on the federal judiciary. Washington, DC: U.S. Restoring accountability in pretrial release: The Philadelphia Supreme Court. pretrial release supervision experiments, final report. Philadel- 11. Associated Press. (2009, April 21). Sticky situation: Judge phia: Crime and Justice Research Institute. orders defendant’s mouth taped shut. Retrieved from 37. Comprehensive Crime Control Act of 1984, Public Law http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,517382,00.html. 98-473, October 12, 1984. 12. U.S. Department of Justice Executive Office for the 38. United States v. Salerno, see note 29. United States Attorneys. (2014). United States Attorneys’ 39. Kuckes, N. (2004). The useful, dangerous fiction of grand Annual Statistical Report, Fiscal Year 2013. Retrieved from jury independence. American Criminal Law Review, 41, https://www.justice.gov/sites/default/files/usao/legacy 1–66. /2014/09/22/13statrpt.pdf. 40. United States v. Calandra, 414 U.S. 338 (1974). 13. Perry, S. (2008). Prosecutors in state courts, 2007. Washing- 41. Walker, S. (2005). Sense and nonsense about crime: A policy ton, DC: U.S. Department of Justice; p. 3. guide (6th ed.). Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole; pp. 22–27. 14. American Bar Association. (2015). Lawyer demographics. 42. Carlson, R. (1991). Criminal justice procedure (4th ed.). Chicago: American Bar Association. Cincinnati: Anderson; p. 65 15. Uphoff, R. (1992, September–October). The criminal 43. Boykin v. Alabama, 395 U.S. 238 (1969). defense lawyer: Zealous advocate, double agent, or belea- 44. United States v. Buckles, 490 U.S. 1099 (1989). guered dealer? Criminal Law Bulletin, p. 420. 45. United States v. Hyde, 520 U.S. 670 (1997). 16. Powell v. Alabama, 287 U.S. 45 (1932). 46. Duke, A. (2011). Mel Gibson pleads ’no contest’ to bat- 17. Johnson v. Zerbst, 304 U.S. 458 (1938). tery against ex-girlfriend. Retrieved from http://www.cnn 18. Betts v. Brady, 316 U.S. 455 (1942). .com/2011/SHOWBIZ/celebrity.news.gossip/03/11/mel 19. Gideon v. Wainwright, 372 U.S. 335 (1963). .gibson.hearing/. 20. Argersinger v. Hamlin, 407 U.S. 25 (1972). 47. Steadman, H., & Braff, J. (1983). Defendants not guilty by 21. Scott v. Illinois, 440 U.S. 367 (1979). reason of insanity. In J. Mohanan & H. Steadman (Eds.), 22. Supreme Court of the United States Blog. (2013). Mar- Mentally disordered offenders. New York: Plenum. shall v. Rogers. Retrieved from http://www.scotusblog.com 48. Durose, M., & Langan, P. (2007). Felony sentences in /case-files/cases/marshall-v-rodgers/. state courts, 2004. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of 23. Herberman, E., & Kyckelhan, T. (2014, July). State gov- Justice; p. 1. ernment indigent defense expenditures, FY 2008–2012— 49. Walsh, A. (1990). Standing trial versus copping a plea: Is updated. Retrieved from http://www.bjs.gov/content there a penalty? Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, /pub/pdf/sgide0812.pdf. 6, 226–236. 24. DeFrances, C., & Litras, M. (2000). Indigent defense services 50. Baker, S., & Mezzetti, C. (2001). Prosecutorial resources, in large counties, 1999. Washington, DC: U.S. Department plea bargaining, and the decision to go to trial. Jour- of Justice. nal of Law, Economics, and Organization, 17, 149–167; 25. Smolowe, J. (1993, March 29). The trials of the public McDonald, W. (1985). Plea bargaining: Critical issues and defender. Time, p. 50. common practices. Washington, DC: U.S. Government 26. PayScale. (n.d.). Salary survey report for jobs: Pub- Printing Office; Albonetti, C. (1986). Criminality, pros- lic defender. Retrieved from http://www.payscale.com ecutorial screening, and uncertainty: Toward a theory of /research/US/Job=Public_Defender/Salary. discretionary decision making in felony case processing. 27. American Bar Association. (2004). A comprehensive review Criminology, 24, 623–644. of indigent defense in Virginia. West Newton, MA: The Span- genberg Group. 28. Benner, L. A. (2011). Eliminating excessive public defender Chapter 8 workloads. Criminal Justice, 26(2). Retrieved from http:// 1. Burchfield, D. (1991, Fall). Appearance v. reality: ‘L.A. law’. www.americanbar.org/content/dam/aba/publications Phi Kappa Phi Journal, p. 20. /criminal_justice_magazine/cjsu11_benner.authcheck 2. Mills, H. (2014, June 2). Judge denies change of venue dam.pdf. for theater shooting trial, at least for now. Retrieved from 29. Gerstein v. Pugh, 420 U.S. 103 (1975). http://kdvr.com/2014/05/23/judge-denies-change-of-ven 30. Riverside County, California v. McLaughlin, 500 U.S. 44 ue-for-theater-shooting-trial-at-least-for-now/#. (1991). 3. Dusky v. United States, 362 U.S. 402 (1960). 31. United States v. Salerno, 481 U.S. 739 (1987). 4. Barker v. Wingo, 407 U.S. 514 (1972). 32. Bureau of Justice Statistics. (2009). Compendium of federal 5. Ostrom, B., & Hanson, R. (2000). Efficiency, timeliness, and justice statistics, 2009. Washington, DC: U.S. Department quality: A new perspective from nine state criminal trial courts. of Justice; Table 3.1. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice; p. 5. 33. Schlesinger, T. (2005). Racial and ethnic disparity in pre- 6. Ostrom & Hanson, note 5, p. 2. trial criminal processing. Justice Quarterly, 22, 170–193; 7. Gannett Co., Inc. v. DePasquale, 443 U.S. 368 (1979). Demuth, S., & Steffensmeier, D. (2004). The impact of gen- 8. Press Enterprise Co. v. Superior Court of California, 478 U.S. der and race-ethnicity in the pretrial release process. Social 1 (1986). Problems, 51, 222–242; Cohen, T., & Reaves, B. (2008). 9. Nebraska Press Association v. Stuart, 427 U.S. 539 (1976). Pretrial release of felony defendants in state courts. Washing- 10. Greene, E. (1990). Media effects on jurors. Law and Human ton, DC: U.S. Department of Justice; U.S. Department Behavior, 14, 442.

11. Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts. (n.d.). History of 42. Tanford, S., & Penrod, S. (1986). Jury deliberations: cameras in courts. Retrieved from http://www.uscourts.gov/ Discussion content and influence processes in jury about-federal-courts/cameras-courts/history-cameras-courts. decision making. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 16, 12. Rosenmerkel, S., Durose, M., & Farole, D. (2009). Felony 322–347. sentences in state courts, 2006—Statistical tables. Washing- 43. Lynch, M., & Haney, C. (2015, March). Emotion, author- ton, DC: U.S. Department of Justice; Table 4.1. ity, and death: (Raced) negotiations in mock capital jury 13. Richardson, O. (1983). Jury or bench trial? Consider- deliberations. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate ations. Trial, 19, 58–63; Kalven, H., & Zeisel, H. (1966). .net/profile/Mona_Lynch/publication/269419016_Emo- The American jury. Boston: Little, Brown; pp. 56–60. tion_Authority_and_Death_%28Raced%29_Negotiations 14. The Economist. (2009, February 12). The jury is out. Retrieved _in_Mock_Capital_Jury_Deliberations/links/5499f9fd from http://www.economist.com/node/13109647. 0cf21eb3df60e224.pdf. 15. Hans, V., & Vidmar, N. (1986). Judging the jury. New York: 44. Hannaford-Agor, P., Hans, V., Mott, N., & Munsterman, Plenum; p. 109. T. (2002). Are hung juries a problem? Williamsburg, VA: 16. Palko v. Connecticut, 302 U.S. 319 (1937). National Center for State Courts. 17. Snyder v. Massachusetts, 291 U.S. 97 (1934). 45. Gershman, B. (1991). Judicial misconduct during jury 18. Duncan v. Louisiana, 391 U.S. 145 (1968). deliberations. Criminal Law Bulletin, 27, 291–314. 19. Blanton v. North Las Vegas, 489 U.S. 538 (1989). 46. Levine, note 26, p. 164. 20. McKeiver v. Pennsylvania, 403 U.S. 528 (1971). 47. Allen v. United States, 164 U.S. 492 (1896). 21. Williams v. Florida, 399 U.S. 78 (1970). 48. Grant, O. (2004). Rational choice or wrongful discrimina- 22. Williams v. Florida, note 21; Colgrove v. Battin, 413 U.S. 149 tion: The law and economics of jury nullification. George (1973). Mason University Civil Rights Law Journal, 14, 145–187. 23. Ballew v. Georgia, 435 U.S. 223 (1978). 49. Rubenstein, A. (2006). Verdicts of conscience: Nullifica- 24. Waters, N. (2004). Does jury size matter? A review of the liter- tion and the modern jury trial. Columbia Law Review, 106, ature. Williamsburg, VA: National Center for State Courts. 959–993. 25. Waters, see note 24. 50. Hannaford-Agor, P., & Hans, V. (2003). Nullification 26. Boatright, R. (1999). Why citizens don’t respond to jury at work? A glimpse from the National Center for State summonses and what courts can do about it. Judicature, Courts Study of Hung Juries. Chicago-Kent Law Review, 78, 82, 156–163; King, N. (1996). Juror delinquency in crim- 1249–1277. inal trials in America, 1796–1996. Michigan Law Review, 51. Johnson v. Louisiana, 406 U.S. 356 (1972); Apodaca v. Ore- 94, 2673–2715; Levine, J. (1992). Juries and politics. Pacific gon, 406 U.S. 404 (1972). Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole. 52. Douglas v. California, 372 U.S. 353 (1963). 27. Burnett, A. (2005). Jury reform for the 21st century: A 53. Chapper, J., & Hanson, R. (1990). Understanding revers- judge’s perspective. Criminal Justice, 20(1), 32–39. ible error in criminal appeals. State Court Journal, 14, 28. Kutz, A. L. (2005). A jury of one’s peers: Virginia’s restoration 16–18, 24; Neubauer, D. (1991). Winners and losers of rights process and its disproportionate effect on the Afri- before the Louisiana supreme court: The case of criminal can American community. William and Mary Law Review, 46, appeals. Justice Quarterly, 8, 85–106. 2109–2162; Steinberg, M. (1991). The case for eliminating 54. Roper, R., & Melone, A. (1981). Does procedural due pro- peremptory challenges. Criminal Law Bulletin, 27, 216–229. cess make a difference? A study of second trials. Judicature, 29. Fay v. New York, 332 U.S. 261 (1947). 65, 136–141. 30. Batson v. Kentucky, 476 U.S. 79 (1986). 55. Fay v. Noia, 372 U.S. 391 (1963). 31. Hernandez v. New York, 500 U.S. 352 (1991). 56. Coleman v. Thompson, 501 U.S. 722 (1991). 32. Dewan, S. (2010, June 2). Study finds blacks blocked from 57. Keeney v. Tamayo-Reyes, 504 U.S. 1 (1992). Southern juries. The New York Times, p. A14. 58. Herrera v. Collins, 506 U.S. 390 (1993). 33. J.E.B. v. Alabama, 511 U.S. 127 (1994). 34. Scheffey, T. (1999, April 5). Connecticut outlaws reli- gion-based juror challenges. Connecticut Law Tribune; State Chapter 9 v. Fuller, 862 A.2d 1130 (N.J. 2004). 1. Wilson, J. Q. (1985). Thinking about crime (Rev. ed.). New 35. Casarez v. State, 913 S.W.2d 468 (Tex. Crim. App. 1995); York: Vintage Books; p. 260. State v. Davis, 504 N.W. 2d 767 (Minn. 1993). 2. Hobbes, T., as cited in Newman, G. (1985). The punish- 36. Langton, L and Cohen, T. (2008). Civil bench and jury ment response. Albany, NY: Harrow and Heston; p. 201. trials in state courts, 2005. Washington, DC: Bureau of 3. von Hirsch, A. (1976). Doing justice: The choice of punish- Justice Statistics. ments. New York: Hill and Wang; p. 54. 37. Griffin v. California, 380 U.S. 609 (1965). 4. Beccaria, C. (1963). On crimes and punishments (trans. by 38. Small, R. (2009). Assessing readability of capital pattern H. Paolucci). New York: Bobbs-Merrill; Burns, J. H., & jury instructions. Journal of Research in Psychology, 1, 33–92; Hart, H. L. A. (Eds.). (1970). The collected works of Jeremy Lieberman, J., & Krauss, D. (2009). Jury psychology: Social Bentham: An introduction to the principles of morals and legis- aspects of trial process. Burlington, VT: Ashgate; Hastie, R. lation. London: Athlone Press. R., Penrod, S., & Pennington, N. (2002). Inside the jury. 5. Stahlkopf, C., Males, M., & Macallair, D. (2010). Testing Clark, NJ: Lawbook Exchange; Severance, L., Greene, E., & incapacitation theory: Youth crime and incarceration in Loftus, E. (1984). Toward criminal jury instructions that California. Crime & Delinquency, 56, 253–268. jurors can understand. Journal of Criminal Law and Crimi- 6. Piquero, A., & Blumstein, A. (2007). Does incapacita- nology, 75, 198–233. tion reduce crime? Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 23, 39. Elwork, A., Sales, B., & Alfini, J. (1982). Making jury instruc- 267–285. tions understandable. Charlottesville, VA: Michie; Steele, W., 7. DeLisi, M. (2001). Extreme career criminals. American Jr., & Thornburg, E. (1991). Jury instructions: A persistent Journal of Criminal Justice, 25, 239–252. failure to communicate. Judicature, 74, 249–254. 8. Piquero & Blumstein, see note 6; Levitt, S. (1998). Why do 40. Treger, T. L. (1992, December). One jury invisible: A increased arrest rates appear to reduce crime: Deterrence, group dynamics approach to voir dire. Retrieved from incapacitation, or measurement error? Economic Inquiry, http://scholarship.kentlaw.iit.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi? 36, 353–373; Canela-Cacho, J., Blumstein, A., & Cohen, J. article=2883&context=cklawreview. (1997). Relationship between the offending frequency of 41. Kalven & Zeisel, see note 13, p. 488. imprisoned and free offenders. Criminology, 35, 133–176;

Levitt, S. (1996). The effect of prison population size on (2007, December 12). For crack offenders, earlier shot at crime rates: Evidence from prison overcrowding litigation. release. Retrieved from http://www.washingtonpost.com Quarterly Journal of Economics, 111, 319–351. /wp-dyn/content/article/2007/12/11/AR2007121101655 9. Spohn, C. (2009). How do judges decide? The search for .html. fairness and justice in punishment (2nd ed.). Los Angeles: 28. U.S. Sentencing Commission. (n.d.). Amendments to the Sage; p. 15. guidelines manual. Retrieved from http://www.ussc.gov 10. Martinson, R. (1974). What works? Questions and answers /guidelines-manual/amendments-guidelines-manual. about prison reform. Public Interest, 35, 22–54; Lipton, 29. Families Against Mandatory Minimums. (2013). Federal D., Martinson, R., & Wilks, J. (1975). The effectiveness of mandatory minimums. Retrieved from http://famm.org correctional treatment: A survey of evaluation studies. New /wp-content/uploads/2013/08/Chart-All-Fed-MMs-NW York: Praeger; Bailey, W. (1966). Correctional outcome: .pdf. An evaluation of 100 reports. Journal of Criminal Law, 30. The Fair Sentencing Act corrects a long-time wrong in Criminology, and Police Science, 57, 153–160; Eysenck, H. cocaine cases. (2010, August 3). Washington Post. Retrieved (1965). The effects of psychotherapy. International Journal from http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content of Psychiatry, 1, 99–144. /article/2010/08/02/AR2010080204360.html. 11. Lowencamp, C., Latessa, E., & Holsinger, A. (2006). 31. Heumann, M., & Loftin, C. (1979). Mandatory sentencing The risk principle in action: What have we learned from and the abolition of plea bargaining: The Michigan felony 13,676 offenders and 97 correctional programs? Crime & firearm statute. Law and Society Review, 13, 393–430; U.S. Delinquency, 52, 77–93. Department of Justice. (1982). Mandatory sentencing: The 12. Wormith, S., Althouse, R., Simpson, M., Reitzel, L., Fagan, experience of two states (policy briefs). Washington, DC: U.S. T., & Morgan, R. (2007). The rehabilitation and reintegra- Government Printing Office. Meierhoefer, B. (1992). The tion of offenders: The current landscape and some future general effect of mandatory minimum prison terms. Washing- directions for correctional psychology. Criminal Justice and ton, DC: Federal Judicial Center. Behavior, 34, 879–892. 32. Ulmer, J., Kurlychek, M., & Kramer, J. (2007). Prosecutorial 13. Angel, C. M., Sherman, L. W., Strang, H., Ariel, B., Ben- discretion and the imposition of mandatory minimum nett, S., Inkpen, N.,... Richmond, T. S. (2014). Short-term sentences. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 44, effects of restorative justice conferences on post-traumatic 427–458. stress symptoms among robbery and burglary victims: 33. Kempinen, C. (2010). A multi-method study of manda- A randomized controlled trial. Journal of Experimental tory minimum sentences in Pennsylvania. Pennsylvania Criminology, 10(3), 291–307. Retrieved from https://www Commission on Sentencing Research Bulletin, 9, 1–8. .restorativejustice.org.uk/sites/default/files/resources 34. Rohter, L. (1994, May 10). In wave of anticrime fervor, /files/Short-term%20effects%20of%20restorative%20 states rush to adopt laws. The New York Times, p. A19. justice%20conferences%20on%20post-traumatic%20 35. California Courts. (n.d.). California’s three strikes sentenc- stress%20symptoms.pdf. ing law. Retrieved from http://www.courts.ca.gov/20142 14. Johnstone (2008). The agendas of the restorative justice .htm. movement. In H. Miller (Ed.), Restorative justice: from 36. Stanford Law School. (2014, April). Proposition 36 theory to practice (pp. 59–79). Bingley, England: Emerald progress report: Over 1,500 prisoners released histor- Group. ically low recidivism rate. Retrieved from http://law 15. Angel et al., see note 13; Daly, K. (2016). What is restor- .stanford.edu/wp-content/uploads/sites/default/files ative justice? Fresh answers to a vexed question. Vic- /child-page/595365/doc/slspublic/ThreeStrikesReport tims & Offenders, 11(1). Retrieved from http://www .pdf. .tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/15564886.2015 37. Rosich, K., & Kane, K. (2005). Truth in sentencing and .1107797?journalCode=uvao20#.VuXUZPkrLIU. state sentencing practices. NIJ Journal, 252, 18–21. 16. Minnesota Department of Corrections. (n.d.). Restor- 38. Zimring, F., Kamin, S., & Hawkins, G. (1999). Crime and ative justice. Retrieved from http://www.doc.state.mn.us punishment in California. Berkeley, CA: Institute of Govern- /pages/index.php/facilities/juvenile-facilities/red-wing mental Studies Press. /restorative-justice/. 39. Kovandzic, T., Sloan, J., & Vieraitis, L. (2004). ‘Striking 17. Restorative Justice Colorado. (n.d.). What is restorative out’ as crime reduction policy: The impact of ‘three strikes’ justice? Retrieved from http://www.rjcolorado.org/index laws on crime rates in U.S. cities. Justice Quarterly, 21, 207– .html. 240; Kovandzic, T., Sloan, J., & Vieraitis, L. (2002). Unin- 18. Berman, D., & Bibas, S. (2012, June 16). Engaging capital tended consequences of politically popular sentencing emotions. Retrieved from http://www.northwesternlaw policy: The homicide promoting effects of ‘three-strikes’ review.org/online/engaging-capital-emotions; Kennedy v. laws in U.S. cities. Criminology and Public Policy, 1, 399– Louisiana, No. 07-343 (2008). 424; Marvell, T., & Moody, C. (2001). The lethal effects of 19. Ewing v. California, 538 U.S. 11 (2003). three strikes laws. Journal of Legal Studies, 30, 89–106; Mas- 20. Weems v. United States, 217 U.S. 349 (1910). sachusetts Sentencing Commission. (2000). Survey of sen- 21. Trop v. Dulles, 356 U.S. 86 (1958). tencing practices: Truth-in-sentencing reform in Massachusetts. 22. Hillsman, S., Mahoney, B., Cole, G., & Auchter, B. (1987). Boston: Massachusetts Sentencing Commission; Sabol, Fines as criminal sanctions. Washington, DC: National W., Rosich, K., Kane, K., Kirk, D., & Dubin, G. (2002). The Institute of Justice. influences of truth-in-sentencing reforms on changes in states’ 23. Clear, T., Hewitt, J., & Regoli, R. (1978). Discretion and sentencing practices and prison populations. Washington, DC: the determinate sentence: Its distribution, control, and Urban Institute. effect on time served. Crime & Delinquency, 24, 428–445. 40. Sabol, W., Rosich, K., Kane, K., Kirk, D., & Dubin, G. 24. Fogel, D. (1975).We are the living proof. In The justice (2002). Influences of truth-in-sentencing reforms on changes model for corrections (p. 310). Cincinnati: Anderson. in states’ sentencing practices and prison populations. Wash- 25. Blakely v. Washington, 542 U.S. 296 (2004). ington, DC: The Urban Institute. 26. United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220 (2005). 41. Lovegrove, A. (1989). Judicial decision making, sentencing 27. Mears, B. (2007). Justices: Judges can slash crack sen- policy, and numerical guidance. London: Springer-Verlag, tences. Retrieved from http://www.cnn.com/2007/US 42. McLeod, M. (1986). Victim participation at sentencing. /law/12/10/scotus.crack.cocaine/index.html; Fears, D. Criminal Law Bulletin, 22, 501–517.

43. Cassell, P. (2009). In defense of victim impact statements. resources in judicial sentencing. Review of Public Data The Ohio State Journal of Criminal Law, 6, 611–648. Use, 5, 30–51; Steffensmeier, D., Kramer, J., & Streifel, C. 44. Myers, B., & Greene, E. (2004). The prejudicial nature of (1993). Gender and imprisonment decisions. Criminology, victim impact statements: Implications for capital sentenc- 31, 411–446. ing policy. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 10, 492–515. 57. Daly, K. (1987). Discrimination in the criminal courts: 45. Ulmer, J., Eisenstein, J., & Johnson, B. (2010). Trial penal- Family, gender, and the problem of equal treatment. Social ties in federal sentencing: Extra-guidelines factors and dis- Forces, 66, 154. trict variation. Justice Quarterly, 27, 560–592; Ulmer, J., & 58. Daly, K. (1989). Rethinking judicial paternalism: Gender, Bradley, M. (2006). Variation in trial penalties among seri- work-family relations, and sentencing. Gender & Society, ous violent offenses. Criminology, 44, 631–670; King, N., 3, 9–36; Belknap, J. (2001). The invisible woman. Belmont, Soulé, D., Steen, S., & Weidner, R. (2005). When process CA: Thomson/Wadsworth; Moyer, I. (1992). The changing affects punishment: Differences in sentences after guilty roles of women in the criminal justice system (2nd ed.) Pros- plea, bench trial, and jury trial in five guideline states. pect Heights, IL: Waveland Press. Columbia Law Review, 105, 960–1009; Johnson, B. (2003). 59. Steffensmeier et al., see note 57. Racial and ethnic disparities in sentencing departures 60. Wooldredge, J. (2007). Neighborhood effects on felony across modes of conviction. Criminology, 41, 449–490. sentencing. Journal of Research on Crime and Delinquency, 46. Blumstein, A., Cohen, J., Martin, S., & Tonry, M. (1983). 44, 238–263; LaFrentz, C., & Spohn, C. (2006). Who is Research on sentencing: The search for reform (Vol. I). Wash- punished more harshly in federal courts? The interac- ington, DC: National Academies Press; p. 8. tion of race/ethnicity, gender, age, and employment sta- 47. Lovegrove, see note 41, p. 4. tus in the sentencing of drug offenders. Justice Research & 48. Carson, A. (2015). Prisoners in 2014. Washington, DC: Policy, 8, 25–56; Stacey, A., & Spohn, C. (2006). Gender Bureau of Justice Statistics. and the social costs of sentencing: An analysis of sen- 49. Crow, M. (2008). The complexities of prior record, race, tences imposed on male and female offenders in three ethnicity, and policy: Interactive effects in sentencing. U.S. district courts. Berkeley Journal of Criminal Law, 11 , Criminal Justice Review, 33, 502–523. 43–76; Spohn, C. (2005). Sentencing decisions in three 50. Muñoz, E., & Freng, A. (2007). Age, racial/ethnic minority U.S. district courts: Testing the assumption of uniformity status, gender and misdemeanor sentencing. Journal of in the federal sentencing process. Justice Research & Policy, Ethnicity in Criminal Justice, 5, 29–57; Mitchell, O. (2005). 7, 1–28. A meta-analysis of race and sentencing research: Explain- 61. Spohn, C. (2009). Race, sex, and pretrial detention in fed- ing the inconsistencies. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, eral court: Indirect effects and cumulative disadvantage. 21, 439–466; Demuth, S., & Steffensmeier, D. (2004). Eth- Kansas Law Review, 57, 879–902. nicity effects on sentence outcomes in large urban courts: 62. Turner, G., & Champion, D. (1988/1989). The elderly Comparisons among white, black, and Hispanic defen- offender and sentencing leniency. Journal of Offender dants. Social Science Quarterly, 85, 994–1011. Counseling, Services, and Rehabilitation, 13, 125–140. 51. Brennan, P., & Spohn, C. (2008). Race/ethnicity and sen- 63. Chettiar, I., & Gupta, V. (2012, June 13). Why are we tencing outcomes among drug offenders in North Caro- spending so much to lock up elderly prisoners who pose lina. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 24, 371–398. little threat? Retrieved from https://www.aclu.org/blog/ 52. Carson, see note 48; Wooldredge, J., Frank, J., Goulette, why-are-we-spending-so-much-lock-elderly-prisoners- N., & Travis III, L. (2015). Is the impact of cumulative who-pose-little-threat. disadvantage on sentencing greater for Black defendants? 64. Johnson, see note 45. Criminology & Public Policy, 14, 187–223. 65. Wu, J., & Spohn, C. (2009). Does an offender’s age have 53. Blackwell, B., Holleran, D., & Finn, M. (2008). The impact an effect on sentence length? Criminal Justice Policy Review, of the Pennsylvania sentencing guidelines on sex differ- 20, 379–413. ences in sentencing. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Jus- 66. Snell, T. (2010). Capital punishment, 2014—Statistical tables. tice, 24, 399–418; Brennan, P. (2006). Sentencing female Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice. misdemeanants: An examination of the direct and indi- 67. Furman v. Georgia, 408 U.S. 238 (1972). rect effects of race/ethnicity. Justice Quarterly, 23, 60–95; 68. Gregg v. Georgia, 428 U.S. 153 (1976). Spohn, C., & Beichner, D. (2000). Is preferential treat- 69. Coker v. Georgia, 433 U.S. 584 (1977). ment of female offenders a thing of the past? A multisite 70. Kennedy v. Louisiana, see note 18. study of gender, race, and imprisonment. Criminal Justice 71. McCleskey v. Kemp, 481 U.S. 279 (1986). Policy Review, 11 , 149–184. 72. Penry v. Lynaugh, 492 U.S. 302 (1989). 54. Doerner, J., & Demuth, S. (2010). The independent and 73. Atkins v. Virginia, 536 U.S. 304 (2002). joint effects of race/ethnicity, gender, and age on sentenc- 74. Payne v. Tennessee, 498 U.S. 1076 (1991). ing outcomes in U.S. federal courts. Justice Quarterly, 27, 75. Booth v. Maryland, 482 U.S. 496 (1987); South Carolina v. 1–27; Steffensmeier, D., & Demuth, S. (2006). Does gen- Gathers, 490 U.S. 805 (1989). der modify the effects of race-ethnicity on criminal sen- 76. Payne v. Tennessee, see note 75. tencing? Sentences for male and female white, black, and 77. Roper v. Simmons, 543 U.S. 551 (2005). Hispanic defendants. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 78. Stanford v. Kentucky, 492 U.S. 361 (1989). 22, 241–261; Johnson, see note 45. 79. Snell, see note 67. 55. Freiburger, T. (2010). The effects of gender, family status, 80. Snell, see note 67. and race on sentencing decisions. Behavioral Sciences and 81. Snell, see note 67. the Law, 28, 378–395; Daly, K. (1989). Neither conflict 82. Snell, see note 67; O’Connor, A. (2010, September 23). nor labeling, nor paternalism will suffice: Intersections Woman, 41, is executed in Virginia. The New York Times. of race, ethnicity, gender, and family in criminal court Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/2010/09/24/ decisions. Crime & Delinquency, 35, 136–168; Daly, K., & us/24execute.html. Tonry, M. (1997). Gender, race, and sentencing. Crime and 83. Hill v. Florida, No. SC06-2 (2006). Justice, 22, 201–252. 84. Baze et al., v. Rees, No. 07-5439 (2008). 56. Lotz, R., & Hewitt, J. (1977). The influence of legally irrel- 85. Baze et al., v. Rees, see note 85; Word, R. (2006, April 23). evant factors on felony sentencing. Sociological Inquiry, High court to hear lethal injection case. Mercury News, 47, 39–48; Hewitt, J. (1977). The effects of individual p. A1; Mears, B. (2006, April 26). Justices: Does lethal

injection hurt? Retrieved from http://www.cnn.com/2006 of Empirical Legal Studies, 11(4), 637–696. Retrieved from /LAW/04/26/scotus.injection/. https://www.unc.edu/~fbaum/teaching/POLI490-Fa15 86. De Vogue, A., & Powell, D. (2009, December 8). Ohio killer /JLES-2014-Donohue.pdf. executed, first person in U.S. to die by 1-drug lethal injection. 104. Rapaport, E. (1991). The death penalty and gender dis- Retrieved from http://www.foxnews.com/us/2009/12/08 crimination. Law and Society Review, 25, 367–383. /ohio-killer-executed-person-die-drug-lethal-injection/. 105. Streib, V. (2009). Death penalty for female offenders, 87. Eckholm, E. (2015, April 29). Supreme Court justices January 1, 1973 through June 30, 2009. Retrieved from hear Oklahoma inmates’ lethal injection case. Retrieved http://www.scribd.com/doc/17311216/Death-Penalty from http://www.nytimes.com/2015/04/30/us/supreme -for-Female-Offenders-by-Victor-Streib. -court-to-hear-oklahoma-inmates-lethal-injection-case 106. O’Connor, see note 83. .html?_r=0. 107. Williams, M., Demuth, S., & Holcomb, J. (2007). Under- 88. Glossip v. Gross, 576 U.S. (2015). standing the influence of victim gender in death penalty 89. Wilson, see note 1, p. 178. cases: The importance of victim race, sex-related victimiza- 90. Ehrlich, I. (1976). The deterrent effect of capital punish- tion, and jury decision making. Criminology, 45, 865–891; ment: A question of life and death. American Economic Holcomb, J., Williams, M., & Demuth, S. (2004). White Review, 65, 397–417. female victims and death penalty disparity research. Jus- 91. Zimmerman, P. (2004). State executions, deterrence, and tice Quarterly, 21, 877–902; Williams, M., & Holcomb, J. the incidence of murder. Journal of Applied Economics, 7, (2004). The interactive effects of victim race and gender 163–193. on death sentence disparity findings. Homicide Studies, 8, 92. Yang, B., & Lester, D. (2008). The deterrent effect of execu- 350–376. tions: A meta-analysis thirty years after Ehrlich. Journal of 108. Stauffer, A., Smith, D., Cochran, J., Fogel, S., & Bjerre- Criminal Justice, 36, 453–460. gaard, B. (2006). The interaction between victim race and 93. Gallup. (n.d.). Death penalty. Retrieved from http://www gender on sentencing outcomes in capital murder trials. .gallup.com/poll/1606/death-penalty.aspx. Homicide Studies, 10, 98–117. 94. Gallup, see note 94. 109. Shepherd, J. (2005). Deterrence versus brutalization: 95. Federal Bureau of Investigation. (2013). Crime in the Capital punishment’s differing impacts among the states. United States, 2013. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Michigan Law Review, 104, 203–255; Steiker, C. (2005). Justice. No, capital punishment is not morally required: Deter- 96. Collins, P. A., Boruchowitz, R. C., Hickman, M. J., & rence, deontology, and the death penalty. Stanford Law Larrañaga, M. A. (2015, January 1). An analysis of the eco- Review, 58, 751–790. nomic costs of seeking the death penalty in Washington 110. Bowers, W. (1988). The effect of executions is brutal- state. Retrieved from http://www.deathpenaltyinfo.org ization, not deterrence. In K. Haas & J. Inciardi (Eds.), /documents/WashingtonCosts.pdf. Challenging capital punishment: Legal and social science 97. Snell, T. L. (2014). Capital punishment, 2013—Statistical approaches (pp. 49–89). Newbury Park, CA: Sage; see also tables. Retrieved from http://www.bjs.gov/content/pub Bowers, W., & Pierce, G. (1980). Deterrence or brutal- /pdf/cp13st.pdf. ization? What is the effect of executions? Crime & Delin- 98. Legislative auditor, Carson City, Nevada. (2014). State quency, 26, 453–484. of Nevada performance audit. Fiscal costs of the death 111. Radelet, M., & Borg, M. (2000). The changing nature of penalty. Retrieved from http://www.deathpenaltyinfo.org death penalty debates. Annual Review of Sociology, 26, /documents/NevadaCosts.pdf. 43–61; Donohue, J., & Wolfers, J. (2005).Uses and abuses 99. Keil, T., & Vito, G. (1990). Race and the death penalty in of empirical evidence in the death penalty debate. Stanford Kentucky murder trials: An analysis of post-Gregg out- Law Review, 58, 791–846. comes. Justice Quarterly, 7, 189–206; Gross, S., & Mauro, R. 112. The Innocence Project. Facts on post-conviction DNA (1989). Death and discrimination: Racial disparities in capital exonerations. Retrieved from http://www.innocenceproj sentencing. Boston: Northeastern University Press; Zeisel, ect.org/exonerate/. H. (1981). Race bias in the administration of the death 113. Gross, S., Jacoby, K., Matheson, D., Montgomery, N., & penalty: The Florida experience. Harvard Law Review, 95, Patil, S. (2005). Exonerations in the United States, 1989 456–468 through 2003. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 95, 100. Pierce, G., & Radelet, M. (2002). Race, region, and death 523–560. sentencing in Illinois, 1988–1997. Oregon Law Review, 81, 114. McCleskey v. Kemp, see note 72. 39–96; Paternoster, R., Brame, R., Bacon, S., Ditchfield, A., 115. McCleskey v. Zant, 499 U.S. 467 (1991). Biere, D., Beckman, K., et al. An empirical analysis of Mary- land’s death sentencing system with respect to the influence of race and legal jurisdiction: Final report. Retrieved from Chapter 10 http://www.aclu-md.org/uploaded_files/0000/0377/md 1. Bureau of Justice Statistics. (2015, February 26). Jus- _death_penalty_race_study.pdf. tice expenditure and employment extracts, 2012— 101. Baldus, D., Pulaski, C., & Woodworth, G. (1983). Com- Preliminary. Retrieved from http://www.bjs.gov/index parative review of death sentences: An empirical study .cfm?ty=pbdetail&iid=5239. of the Georgia experience. Journal of Criminal Law and 2. Morse, W. (1973). The attorney general’s survey of release Criminology, 74, 661–685; Baldus, D., & Woodworth, G. procedures. In G. Killinger & P. Cromwell, Jr. (Eds.), Penol- (2003). Race discrimination in the administration of the ogy (p. 23). St. Paul, MN: West. death penalty: An overview of the empirical evidence with 3. Johnston, N. (2004). The world’s most influential prison: special emphasis on the post-1990 research. Criminal Law Success or failure? The Prison Journal, 84, 20S–40S. Bulletin, 39, 194–227. 4. Thorsten Sellin, T. (1970). The origin of the Pennsylva- 102. Pierce, G., & Radelet, M. (2005). The impact of legally nia system of prison discipline. The Prison Journal, 50, inappropriate factors on death sentencing for California 15–17. homicides, 1990–1999. Santa Clara Law Review, 46, 1–47. 5. Barnes, H. H. (1930). The story of punishment. Boston: 103. Donohue III, J. J. (2014). An empirical evaluation of the Stratford. Connecticut death penalty system since 1973: Are there 6. Sullivan, L. (1990). The prison reform movement: Forlorn unlawful racial, gender, and geographic disparities? Journal hope. Boston: Twayne Publishers; p. 13.

7. Wilson, M. (1931). The crime of punishment. New York: 29. Kaeble, D., Glaze, L., Tsoutis, A., & Minton, T. (2015). Cor- Harcourt Brace. rectional populations in the United States, 2014. Retrieved 8. Barnes, H. E., & Teeters, N. (1959). New horizons in crimi- from http://www.bjs.gov/content/pub/pdf/cpus14.pdf. nology (3rd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall. 30. Kaeble et al., see note 29. 9. de Beaumont, G., & de Tocqueville, A. (1833/1964). On 31. Stephan, J. (2008). Census of state and federal correctional the penitentiary system in the United States and its applica- facilities, 2005. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of tion in France. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Justice. Press. 32. Mears, D., & Watson, J. (2006). Toward a fair and bal- 10. Barry, J. V. (1957, June 27). Captain Alexander Macon- anced assessment of supermax prisons. Justice Quarterly, ochie. Victorian Historical Magazine, p. 5. 23, 232–270. 11. Wilson, see note 7. 33. National Institute of Corrections. (1997). Supermax hous- 12. Barry, J. V. (1956). Alexander Maconochie. Journal of Crim- ing: A survey of current practices. Longmont, CO: National inal Law, Criminology and Police Science, 47, 145–161. Institute of Corrections Information Center. 13. Barnes & Teeters, see note 8, p. 423; see also Eriksson, T. 34. Pizarro, J., & Stenius, V. (2004). Supermax prisons: Their (1976). The reformers (trans. by C. Djurklou). New York: rise, current practices, and effects on inmates. The Prison Elsevier; pp. 91–97. Journal, 84, 248–264. 14. State of New York. (1871). Twenty-sixth annual report of 35. Bravin J. (2015, September 2). Large number of inmates the executive committee of the prison association of New York in solitary poses problem for justice system, study says. and accompanying documents for the year 1870. Albany, NY:, Retrieved from http://www.wsj.com/articles/large-num Author. ber-of-inmates-in-solitary-poses-problem-for-justice-sys 15. Barnes, H. E., & Teeters, N. (1942/1945). New hori- tem-study-says-1441209772. zons in criminology (rev. ed.). New York: Prentice Hall; 36. Maine Department of Corrections. (2006). Bolduc Cor- pp. 555–556. rectional Facility. Retrieved from http://www.maine.gov 16. Carson. A. (2015). Prisoners in 2014. Washington, DC: /corrections/adultfacilities/bolduc.shtml. Bureau of Justice Statistics. 37. Oregon Department of Corrections. South Fork Forest 17. Minton, T. D. (2015). Census of jails: Population changes, Camp. Retrieved from https://www.oregon.gov/doc/OPS 1999–2013. Retrieved from http://www.bjs.gov/content /PRISON/pages/sffc.aspx; California Department of For- /pub/pdf/cjpc9913.pdf. estry and Fire Protection. (n.d.). Sugar Pine Conservation 18. Freedman, E. (1974). Their sisters’ keepers. Feminist Stud- Camp #9. Retrieved from http://www.cdcr.ca.gov/Conser ies, 2, 77–95. vation_Camps/Camps/Sugar_Pine/index.html. 19. Hofstadter, R. (1955). The age of reform. New York: Vintage 38. Federal prisons to eliminate boot camps. (2005). Correc- Books; Klein, P. (1920). Prison methods in New York State. tions Today, 67, 13. New York: Longmans Green. 39. Jolliffe, D., Farrington, D. P., & Howard, P. (2013). How 20. Young, Vernetta D. and Rebecca Reviere. 2006. Women long did it last? A 10-year reconviction follow-up study Behind Bars: Gender and Race in U.S. Prisons. Boulder, of high intensity training for young offenders. Journal of CO: Lynne Rienner. Experimental Criminology, 9(4), 515–531. 21. Harris, K. (1998). Women’s imprisonment in the United 40. Haasenritter, D. (2003). The military correctional system: States: A historical analysis of female offenders through An overview. Corrections Today, 65, 58–61; Kaeble et al., see the early 20th century. Corrections Today, 60, 74–80. note 29. 22. Feinman, C. (1984). An historical overview of the treat- 41. Peck, W., & Purcell, T. (2003). U.S. Navy Corrections: ment of incarcerated women. The Prison Journal, 63, 12–26. Confining sailors both at sea and on land. Corrections 23. Harris, see note 21; Rafter, N. (1985). Partial justice: Women Today, 65, 66–70. in state prisons, 1800–1935. Boston: Northeastern Uni- 42. American Correctional Association. (2007). 2007 direc- versity Press; Rafter, S. N. (1989). Gender and justice. In tory: Adult and juvenile correctional departments, institutions, L. Goodstein & D. MacKenzie (Eds.), The American prison agencies, and probation and parole authorities. Lanham, MD: (pp. 89–109). New York: Plenum. American Correctional Association. 24. Public Law 96-157, 827, codified as 18 U.S. Code 1761(c). 43. Ross, J., Heffernan, E., Sevick, J., & Johnson, F. (1980). 25. Turner, S., & Petersilia, J. (1996). Work release: Recidivism Characteristics of co-correctional institutions. In J. and corrections costs in Washington State. Washington, DC: Smykla (Ed.), Coed prison (pp. 77–78). New York: Human U.S. Department of Justice. Sciences Press; Smykla, J. O., & Williams, J. (1996). 26. Pursell, T. (2010, September 23). Work release inmates Co-corrections in the United States of America, 1970– busted. Retrieved from http://dailyitem.com/0100_news 1990: Two decades of disadvantages for women prisoners. /x1535827298/Work-release-inmates-busted; Winona Women and Criminal Justice, 8, 61–76. Daily News. (2010, March 11). Inmate on work release 44. Short, D. (2002). Illinois correctional policy-makers initi- now faces abduction charges. Retrieved from http:// ate historical changes. Corrections Today, 64, 102–106. www.winonadailynews.com/news/state-and-regional/wi 45. U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement. (n.d.). FY /inmate-on-work-release-now-faces-abduction-charges 2015 ICE immigration removals. Retrieved from https:// /article_27675566-2cd5-11df-a582-001cc4c03286.html; www.ice.gov/removal-statistics. Lincoln police arrest work release inmate. (2010, July 14). 46. Federal Bureau of Prisons. (2016, February 27). Inmate Lincoln Journal Star. http://journalstar.com/news/local statistics. Retrieved from https://www.bop.gov/about /crime-and-courts/article_b62596b8-8fa5-11df-acb7 /statistics/statistics_inmate_offenses.jsp. -001cc4c03286.html. 47. Powell, J. C. (1891). The American Siberia. Chicago: H. 27. 13WhoTV.com. (2016, January 15). Authorities looking J. Smith; Prison labor in 1936. (1938). Monthly Labor for sex offender who failed to return from work release. Review, 47, 251. Retrieved from http://whotv.com/2016/01/15/authori 48. Ethridge, P., & Marquart, J. (1993). Private prisons in ties-looking-for-sex-offender-who-failed-to-return-from Texas. Justice Quarterly, 10, 31–50. -work-release/#. 49. Hanson, L. C. (1991). The privatization of corrections 28. U.S. Department of Justice. (1974). National Advisory Com- movement. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 7, mission on Criminal Justice Standards and Goals, Standard 1–28; see also Thomas, C. (1988). Does the private sector 2.17, part 2c. Washington, DC: Author. have a role in American corrections? Paper presented at

A Critical Look at Privatization conference, Indianapolis, 5. Goffman, E. (1961). Asylums: Essays on the social situation of IN; Dilulio, Jr., J. (1988). Private prisons. Washington, DC: mental patients and other inmates. New York: Doubleday; p. 6. U.S. Department of Justice; Hutto, T. D. (1990). The pri- 6. Irwin, J., & Austin, J. (1994). It’s about time: America’s vatization of prisons. In J. Murphy & J. Dison (Eds.), Are imprisonment binge. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth; p. 74. prisons any better? (pp. 111–127). Newbury Park, CA: Sage. 7. Carson, E. A. (2015). Prisoners in 2014. Retrieved from 50. Kaeble et al., see note 29. http://www.bjs.gov/content/pub/pdf/p14.pdf. 51. Perrone, D., & Pratt, T. (2003). Comparing the quality of 8. Carson, see note 7. confinement and cost-effectiveness of public versus pri- 9. Williams, P., & Wu, Y. (2004). The great wall of confine- vate prisons: What we know, why we do not know more, ment. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press; Hawk, and where to go from here. The Prison Journal, 83, 301– D. (2003). The hidden Gulag: Exposing North Korea’s 322; Board, D. Private prisons in Oregon. Portland. prison camps, prisoners’ testimonies, and satellite pho- 52. Bales, W., Bedard, L., Quinn, S., Ensley, D., & Holley, G. tographs. U.S. Committee for Human Rights in North (2005). Recidivism of public and private state prison Korea. Retrieved from https://www.hrnk.org/uploads inmates in Florida. Criminology and Public Policy, 4, 57–82; /pdfs/The_Hidden_Gulag.pdf. Thomas, C. (2005). Recidivism and public and private 10. Bureau of Labor Statistics. (n.d.). Occupational employ- state prison inmates in Florida: Issues and unanswered ment and wages, 2015: 33-3012 correctional officers and questions. Criminology and Public Policy, 4, 89–99. jailers. Retrieved from http://www.bls.gov/oes/current 53. Robbins, I. (1988). The legal dimensions of private incarcera- /oes333012.htm. tion. Washington, DC: American Bar Association. 11. Carson, see note 7. 54. Pratt, T., & Maahs, J. (1999). Are private prisons more 12. Carson, see note 7. cost-effective than public prisons? A meta-analysis of eval- 13. Carson, see note 7. uation research studies. Crime & Delinquency, 45, 358–371. 14. Pennsylvania Department of Corrections. (n.d.). Correc- 55. Dilulio, see note 53. tional industries. Retrieved from http://www.cor.pa.gov 56. Medina v. O’Neill, 589 F. Supp. 1028 (1984). /pci/Pages/default.aspx; Section 4122(b) of title 18, 57. Richardson v. McKnight, 521 U.S. 399 (1997). United States Code; Mullen, J., Chabotar, K., & Carrow, 58. Correctional Services Corporation v. Malesko, 534 U.S. 61 D. (1985). The privatization of corrections. Washington, DC: (2001). National Institute of Justice. 59. Weisheit, R., Falcone, D., & Wells, L. E. (1994). Rural crime 15. Louis, T. P., & Sparger, J. (1990). Treatment modalities and rural policing: An overview of selected issues. Normal, IL: within prison. Are prisons any better? Twenty years of correc- Rural Police Project. tional reform. Newbury Park, CA: Sage; p. 151. 60. Irwin, J. (1985). Jails. Berkeley: University of California 16. Heigel, C. P., Stuewig, J., & Tangney, J. P. (2011). Self- Press. reported physical health of inmates: Impact of incarcer- 61. Minton, see note 17. ation and relation to optimism. Journal of Correctional 62. Minton, see note 17. Health Care, 16(2). Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm 63. Mays, G. L., & Thompson, J. (1988). Mayberry revisited: .nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3086199/. The characteristics and operations of America’s small jails. 17. Carson, see note 7. Justice Quarterly, 5, 421–440. 18. Stephan, J. (2008). Census of state and federal correctional 64. Weisheit et al., see note 64. facilities, 2005. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice. 65. Paulus, P., McCain, G., & Cox, V. (1981). Prison standards: 19. Duwe, G., & Clark, V. (2014). The effects of prison-based Some pertinent data on crowding. Federal Probation, 45, educational programming on recidivism and employ- 48–54. ment. The Prison Journal, 94(4), 454–478. 66. Spears, L., & Taylor, D. (1990). Coping with our jam- 20. Stephan, see note 18. packed jails. Corrections Today, 52, 20. 21. Dallao, M. (1996). Changing the rules of recidivism 67. Wener, R. (2006). Effectiveness of the direct supervi- through recreation. Corrections Today, 58, 80, 101. sion system of correctional design and management: 22. Cressey, D. (1965). Prison organizations. In J. March A review of the literature. Criminal Justice and Behavior, (Ed.), Handbook of organizations (pp. 1023–1070). Chi- 33, 392–410; Zupan, L. (1991). Jails: Reform and the new cago: Rand McNally. generation philosophy. Cincinnati: Anderson; Zupan, L., & 23. Federal Bureau of Prisons. (2016). Staff statistics. Washing- Menke, B. (1988). Implementing organizational change: ton, DC: Federal Bureau of Prisons. From traditional to new generation jail operations. Policy 24. Cornelius, G. (2010). The correctional officer: A practical Studies Review, 7, 615–625; Zupan, L., & Stohr-Gillmore, guide (2nd ed.). Durham, NC: Carolina University Press. M. (1988). Doing time in the new generation jail. Policy 25. Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2015). Household data annual Studies Review, 7, 626–640. averages: 11. Employed persons by detailed occupation, 68. Noonan, M. (2015). Mortality in local jails and state pris- sex, race, and Hispanic or Latino ethnicity. Retrieved from ons, 2000–2013—Statistical tables. Retrieved from http:// http://www.bls.gov/cps/cpsaat11.pdf. www.bjs.gov/content/pub/pdf/mljsp0013st.pdf. 26. Federal Bureau of Prisons. (2016). Staff gender. Retrieved from https://www.bop.gov/about/statistics/statistics_staff _gender.jsp. Chapter 11 27. Rowan, J. (1996). Who is safer in male maximum security 1. Quoted in Giallombardo, R. (1966). Society of women: A prisons? Corrections Today, 58, 186–189. study of a women’s prison. New York: John Wiley & Sons; 28. Bagley v. Watson, 579 F.Supp. 1099 (D.Or. 1983). p. 23. 29. Forts v. Ward, 621 F.2d 1210 (2d Cir. 1980). 2. Henrichson, C., & Delaney, R. (2012). The price of pris- 30. Jordan v. Gardner, 986 F.2d 1521 (9th Cir. 1993). ons: What incarceration costs taxpayers. Retrieved from 31. Seidel, J. (2009, January 4). Sexual assaults on female http://www.vera.org/sites/default/files/resources/down inmates went unheeded. Detroit Free Press. Retrieved from loads/price-of-prisons-updated-version-021914.pdf. http://www.november.org/stayinfo/breaking09/Sexua 3. CNN. (n.d.). Education vs prison costs. Retrieved from l_Assaults_Unheeded.html. http://money.cnn.com/infographic/economy/education 32. Beck, A. J., & Rantala, R. R. (2014). Sexual victimization -vs-prison-costs/. reported by adult correctional authorities, 2009–11. Retrieved 4. Henrichson & Delaney, see note 2. from http://www.bjs.gov/content/pub/pdf/svraca0911.pdf.

33. Cardona, F. (2009, June 1). Inmate wins $1.3 million in 59. National Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Coa- Denver rape case. Denver Post. Retrieved from http://www lition. (2011, February 15). Recommendations for juvenile .denverpost.com/2009/06/10/inmate-wins-1-3-million justice reform: Opportunities for the Obama administra- -in-denver-rape-case/. tion. Retrieved from http://www.sentencingproject.org 34. Mills, J. F., & Kroner, D. G. (2003). Anger as a predictor /publications/recommendations-for-juvenile-justice of institutional misconduct and recidivism in a sample -reform-opportunities-for-the-obama-administration. of violent offenders. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 18, 60. National Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention 282–294; Trulson, C. R. (2007). Determinants of disrup- Coalition, see note 58. tion. Institutional misconduct among state-committed 61. Carson, see note 7. delinquents. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, 5, 7–34. 62. Carson, see note 7. 35. Morris, R., Longmire, D., Buffington-Vollum, J., & Vollum, 63. Carson, see note 7. S. (2010). Institutional misconduct and differential parole 64. Severance, T. (2005). ‘You know who you can go to’: eligibility among capital inmates. Criminal Justice and Cooperation and exchange between incarcerated women. Behavior, 37, 417–438. The Prison Journal, 85, 343–367. 36. Cunningham, M., & Sorensen, J. (2007). Predictive factors 65. Giallombardo, R. (1966). Social roles in a prison for women. for violent misconduct in close custody. The Prison Journal, Social Problems, 13, 268–288; Propper, A. (1982). Make 87, 241–253. -believe families and homosexuality among imprisoned 37. McDougall, A., Campbell, M. A., & Santor, D. A. (2013). girls. Criminology, 20, 127–139; Cranford, S., & Williams, R. Institutional offense patterns in adolescent offenders: (1998). Critical issues in managing female offenders. Cor- The role of antisocial and mental health indicators. Youth rections Today, 60, 130–134; Severance, see note 63. Violence and Juvenile Justice, 11(2), 99–114. 66. U.S. General Accounting Office. (1999). Women in prison: 38. Gardner, B. O., Boccaccini, M. T., Bitting, B. S., & Edens, Issues and challenges confronting U.S. correctional systems. J. F. (2015). Personality Assessment Inventory scores as Washington, DC: U.S. General Accounting Office; Greene, predictors of misconduct, recidivism, and violence: A J., & Pranis, K. (2006). Growth trends and recent research. meta-analytic review. Psychological Assessment, 27(2), 534. In A. Jacobs & S. From (Eds.), Hard hit: The growth in the 39. Wolff v. McDonnell, 418 U.S. 539 (1974). imprisonment of women, 1977–2004 (pp. 7–28). New York: 40. Frost, N. A., & Monteiro, C. E. (2016). National Insti- Women’s Prison Association. tute of Justice: Administrative segregation in U.S. pris- 67. The Sentencing Project. (2015). Incarcerated women and ons. Retrieved from https://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1 girls. Retrieved from http://www.sentencingproject.org /nij/249749.pdf. /doc/publications/cc_Incarcerated_Women_Factsheet_ 41. Irwin & Austin, see note 6, p. 91. Sep24sp.pdf; Glaze, L. E., & Maruschak, L. M. (2008). Par- 42. Maruschak, L. M. (2012). HIV in prisons, 2000–2010. ents in prison and their minor children. Retrieved from Retrieved from http://www.bjs.gov/content/pub/pdf http://www.bjs.gov/content/pub/pdf/pptmc.pdf. /hivp10.pdf. 68. Greene & Pranis, see note 65. 43. Maruschak, see note 41. 69. Gebreyes, R. (2015, March 11). Formerly incarcer- 44. James, D., & Glaze, L. (2006). Mental health problems of ated woman remembers giving birth while shackled prison and jail inmates. Washington, DC: U.S. Department to a bed. Retrieved from http://www.huffingtonpost of Justice. .com/2015/03/11/incarcerated-woman-birth-shackled 45. James & Glaze, see note 43. _n_6846112.html. 46. James & Glaze, see note 43. 70. Holt, K. (1982). Nine months to life: The law and the 47. Adams, K., & Ferrandino, J. (2008). Managing mentally pregnant inmate. Journal of Family Law, 20, 537. ill inmates in prisons. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 35, 71. Villanueva, C. K. (2009). Mothers, infants and impris- 913–927. onment: A national look at prison nurseries and com- 48. Washington v. Harper, 494 U.S. 210 (1990). munity-based alternatives. Retrieved from http://www 49. Carson, see note 7. .wpaonline.org/wpaassets/Mothers_Infants_and_Impris 50. Office of the Inspector General. (2016). The impact of an onment_2009.pdf. aging inmate population on the Federal Bureau of Pris- 72. Villanueva, see note 70. ons. Retrieved from https://oig.justice.gov/reports/2015 73. Fritz, S., & Whiteacre, K. (2016). Prison nurseries: Experi- /e1505.pdf. ences of incarcerated women during pregnancy. Journal of 51. Shellenbarger, P. (2006, September 25). Aging inmates bring Offender Rehabilitation, 55(1), 1–20. increased ailments, expenses. Grand Rapids Press, p. A3. 74. Sykes, G. (1956). Society of captives: A study of a maxi- 52. Faryon, J. (2010, January 20). Health care costs rising mum security prison. New York: Random House; Haney, as Calif. prison population ages. KPBS. Retrieved from C. (2006). Reform of punishment: Psychological limits to the http://www.kpbs.org/news/2010/jan/20/health-care pains of imprisonment. Washington, DC: American Psycho- -costs-rising-calif-prison-population-a/. logical Association. 53. Chen, S. (2009, November 13). Prison health-care costs 75. Irwin, J., & Cressey, D. (1962). Thieves, convicts, and the rise as inmates grow older and sicker. CNN. Retrieved from inmate culture. Social Problems, 10, 142–155. http://www.cnn.com/2009/CRIME/11/13/aging.inmates 76. Wheeler, S. (1961). Socialization in correctional commu- /index.html. nities. American Sociological Review, 26, 250. 54. Aday, R. (2003). Aging prisoners: Crisis in American correc- 77. Clemmer, D. (1940). The prison community. New York: tions. Westport, CT: Praeger. Holt, Rinehart & Winston. 55. Kerbs, J., & Jolley, J. (2009). A commentary on age seg- 78. Tittle, C. (1974). Prison and rehabilitation: The inevitabil- regation for older prisoners. Criminal Justice Review, 34, ity of failure. Social Problems, 21, 385–394. 119–139. 79. Sykes, G., & Messinger, S. (1960). The inmate social sys- 56. Chen, see note 52. tem. In R. Cloward et al. (Eds.), Theoretical studies in the 57. Bronson, J., Maruschak, L. M., & Berzofsky, M. (2015). social organization of the prison (pp. 5–19). New York: Disabilities among prison and jail inmates, 2011–12. Social Science Research Council. Retrieved from http://www.bjs.gov/content/pub/pdf 80. Trammel, R. (2009). Values, rules, and keeping the peace: /dpji1112.pdf. How men describe order and the inmate code in Califor- 58. Pennsylvania Dept. of Corrections v. Yeskey, 118 F.3d 168 (1998). nia prisons. Deviant Behavior, 30, 746–771.

81. Jacobs, J. (1977). Stateville: The penitentiary in mass society. 101. 148 Congressional Record, 1489, 1494, Statement of Sen. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; p. 207. McConnell, 2002. 82. Winterdyk, J., & Ruddell, R. (2010). Managing prison 102. Manza, J., & Uggen, C. (2006). Locked out: Felon disenfran- gangs: Results from a survey of U.S. prison systems. Journal chisement and American democracy. New York: Oxford Uni- of Criminal Justice, 38, 730–736. versity Press; The Sentencing Project, see note 99. 83. Florida Department of Corrections. Major prison gangs. 103. H.R. 3335 The Democracy Restoration Act of 2009, intro- Gang and security threat group awareness. Retrieved from duced in the House of Representatives, July 24, 2009. http://www.dc.state.fl.us/pub/gangs/prison.html. 104. Wynn, M. (2015, November 24). Beshear restores 84. Beck & Rantala, see note 32. voting rights to some felons. Retrieved from http:// 85. Hassine, V. (2008). Life without parole. New York: Oxford www.courier-journal.com/story/news/2015/11/24 University Press; p. 138. /beshear-restores-voting-rights-some-felons/76282838/. 86. Fleisher, M., & Krienert, J. (2009). The myth of prison rape: 105. The Sentencing Project. (n.d.). Felony disenfranchise- Sexual culture in American prisons. New York: Rowman & ment. Retrieved from http://www.sentencingproject.org Littlefield; p. xiii. /template/page.cfm?id=133. 87. Fleisher & Krienert, see note 85, p. 54. 106. Banning v. Looney, cert. denied, 348 U.S. 859 (1954). 88. Struckman-Johnson, C., & Struckman-Johnson, D. (2002). 107. Jacobs, J. (1980), The prisoner’s rights movement and its Sexual coercion reported by women in three Midwestern impacts. In N. Morris & M. Tonry (Eds.), Crime and justice: prisons. Journal of Sex Research, 39, 217–227; Alarid, L. An annual review of research. (Vol. 2, pp. 557–586). Chi- (2000). Sexual assault and coercion among incarcerated cago: University of Chicago Press. women prisoners: Excerpts from prison letters. Prison Jour- 108. American Correctional Association. (1987). Legal responsi- nal, 80, 391–406; Baro, A. (1997). Spheres of consent: bility and authority of correctional officers. College Park, MD: An analysis of the sexual abuse and sexual exploitation American Correctional Association; p. 8. of women incarcerated in the state of Hawaii. Women and 109. Fulwood v. Clemmer, 206 F.Supp. 370 (D.C. Cir. 1962). Criminal Justice, 8, 61–84; Struckman-Johnson, C., Struck- 110. Kahane v. Carlson, 527 F.2d 492 (2d Cir. 1975). man-Johnson, D., Rucker, L., Bumby, K., & Donaldson, S. 111. Gallahan v. Hollyfield, 670 F.2d 1345 (4th Cir. 1982). (1996). Sexual coercion reported by men and women in 112. Cutter v. Wilkinson, 544 U.S. 709 (2005). prison. Journal of Sex Research, 33, 67–76. 113. Holt v. Hobbs, 574 U.S. ___ (2015). 89. Struckman-Johnson & Struckman-Johnson, see note 87. 114. Gittlemacker v. Prasse, 428 F.2d 1 (3d Cir. 1970). 90. Noonan, M. (2010). Deaths in custody: State prison deaths, 115. United States v. Hitchcock, cert. denied, 410 U.S. 916 (1973). 2001–2007—Statistical tables. Washington, DC: Bureau of 116. Bell v. Wolfish, 441 U.S. 520 (1979); Byrd v. Arpaio, et al. Justice Statistics. No. 07-16640 (9th Cir. 2011). 91. CNN. (2009, January 26). Staffers fired shots to break 117. Hudson v. Palmer, 468 U.S. 517 (1984). up prison brawl, officials say. Retrieved from http:// 118. Block v. Rutherford, 468 U.S. 576 (1984). www.cnn.com/2009/US/01/25/florida.prison.unrest 119. Nolan v. Fitzpatrick, 451 F.2d. 545 (1st Cir. 1971). /index.html; Howell, K. (2016, March 12). Riot breaks 120. Procunier v. Martinez, 416 U.S. 396 (1974). out at Alabama prison; warden stabbed as inmates 121. Ramos v. Lamm, 639 F.2d 559 (10th Cir. 1980). run wild. The Washington Times. Retrieved from 122. Shaw v. Murphy, 523 U.S. 233 (2001). http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2016/mar/12 123. Johnson v. Avery, 393 U.S. 483 (1969). /riot-breaks-out-at-alabama-prison-warden-stabbed-a/. 124. Younger v. Gilmore, 404 U.S. 15 (1971). 92. Langford, T. (2015, July 15). Rookie prison guard killed 125. Procunier v. Martinez, see note 119. escorting violent inmate. The Texas Tribune. Retrieved from 126. Bounds v. Smith, 430 U.S. 817 (1977). https://www.texastribune.org/2015/07/15/rookie-tdcj 127. Bell v. Wolfish, see note 115. -guard-killed-escorting-violent-inmate/. 128. Whitley v. Albers, 475 U.S. 312 (1986). 93. McShane, M. (2008). Prisons in America. New York: LFB 129. Hudson v. McMillian, 503 U.S. 1 (1992). Scholarly Publishing; pp. 161–162. 130. Estelle v. Gamble, 429 U.S. 97 (1976). 94. Wicker, T. (1994). A time to die: The Attica Prison riot. Lin- 131. United States v. DeColegro, 821 F.2d (1st Cir. 1987). coln, NE: University of Nebraska Press. 132. Holt v. Sarver, 309 F.Supp. 362 (E.D. Ark. 1970). 95. Williams, C. J., & Santa Cruz, N. (2009, August 11). Prison 133. Pugh v. Lock, 406 F.Supp 318 (N.D. Ala. 1976). officials had warning that a disturbance was likely in Chino. 134. Ruiz v. Estelle, 503 F.Supp. 1265 (S.D. Tex. 1980). Retrieved from http://articles.latimes.com/2009/aug/11 135. Farmer v. Brennan, Warden, et al., 511 U.S. 825 (1994). /local/me-prison-riot11. 96. Castillo, M., & Shoichet, C. E. (2016, February 11). 49 dead in riot at Mexico’s Topo Chico prison. Retrieved Chapter 12 from http://www.cnn.com/2016/02/11/americas/mexico 1. Murton, T. (1971). Inmate self-government. University of -monterrey-topo-chico-prison-riot/. San Francisco Law Review, 6, 88. 97. Paulus, P. (1988). Prison crowding: A psychological perspec- 2. Kaeble, D., Glaze, L., Tsoutis, A., & Minton, T. (2015). Cor- tive. New York: Springer-Verlag. rectional populations in the United States, 2014. Retrieved 98. McCorkle, R., Miethe, T., & Drass, K. (1995). The roots of from http://www.bjs.gov/content/pub/pdf/cpus14.pdf. prison violence: A test of the deprivation, management, 3. Glaze, L., & Bonczar, T. (2015). Probation and parole in the and ‘not-so-total’ institution models. Crime & Delinquency, United States, 2014. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of 41, 317–331; Boin, R. A., & Van Duin, M. (1995). Prison Justice. riots as organizational failures: A managerial perspective. 4. Kaeble, D., Maruschak, L. M., & Bonczar, T. P. (2015). Pro- The Prison Journal, 75, 357–379; Berg, M., & DeLisi, M. bation and parole in the United States, 2014. Retrieved (2006). The correctional melting pot: Race, ethnicity, cit- from http://www.bjs.gov/content/pub/pdf/ppus14.pdf. izenship, and prison violence. Journal of Criminal Justice, 5. Glaze & Bonczar, see note 3. 34, 631–642. 6. United States Courts. (2013, July 18). Supervision 99. Gerber v. Hickman, 264 F.3d 882 (9th Cir. 2001). costs significantly less than incarceration in federal 100. The Sentencing Project. (2008). Felony disenfranchisement system. Retrieved from http://www.uscourts.gov/news laws in the United States. Washington, DC: The Sentencing /2013/07/18/supervision-costs-significantly-less-incarcer Project. ation-federal-system.

7. United States Courts. (2015). Judicial business 2015. 30. Bennis v. Michigan, 516 U.S. 442 (1996). Retrieved from http://www.uscourts.gov/statistics-reports 31. Naylor, R. (2007). Criminal profits, terror dollars, and /judicial-business-2015. nonsense. Crime & Justice International, 23, 27–33; Clinger- 8. Board of Probation and Parole. (2005). Annual report FY mayer, J., Hecker, J., & Madsen, S. (2005). Asset forfeiture 2004–05. Nashville: Board of Probation and Parole. and police priorities: The impact of program design on 9. American Probation and Parole Association. (2013). Pro- law enforcement activities. Criminal Justice Policy Review, bation & parole directory. Retrieved from http://www.appa 16, 319–335. -net.org/eweb/DynamicPage.aspx?Webcode=VB_Directory. 32. National Center for Victims of Crime. (n.d.). Restitu- 10. Andrews, D., & Bonta, J. (1995). LSI-R, The level of service tion. Retrieved from https://victimsofcrime.org/help inventory—Revised. Toronto: Multi-Health Systems, Inc.; -for-crime-victims/get-help-bulletins-for-crime-victims Manchak, S., Skeem, J., Douglas, K., & Siranosian, M. /restitution. (2009). Does gender moderate the predictive utility of 33. Welsh, D. B., & Farrington, D. (2000). Correctional inter- the level of service inventory—Revised (LSI-R) for seri- vention programs and cost-benefit analysis. Criminal Jus- ous violent offenders? Criminal Justice and Behavior, 36, tice and Behavior, 27, 115–133. 425–442. 34. Agopian, M. (1989). Targeting juvenile gang offenders for 11. Kaeble et al., see note 4. community service. Community Services: International Jour- 12. McCarthy, B., & McCarthy, Jr., B. (1991). Community-based nal of Family Care, 1, 99–108. corrections (2nd ed.). Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole; p. 376. 35. See, for example: Olson, S., & Dzur, A. (2004). Revisit- 13. U.S. v. Knights, 534 U.S. 112 (2001). ing informal justice: Restorative justice and democratic 14. Drug treatment role increasing for probation, parole agen- professionalism. Law and Society Review, 38, 139–176; cies. (1988). Criminal Justice Newsletter, 9, 6. Braithwaite, J. (2002). Restorative justice and responsive reg- 15. Taxman, F. (2002). Supervision—Exploring the dimen- ulation. New York: Oxford University Press; Perry, J. (Ed.). sions of effectiveness. Federal Probation, 66, 14–27. (2002). Repairing communities through restorative justice. 16. Taxman, see note 15. Lanham, MD: American Correctional Association; John- 17. Gagnon v. Scarpelli, 411 U.S. 778 (1973). stone, G. (2002). Restorative justice: Ideas, values, debates. 18. Glaze & Bonczar, see note 3, p. 4. Portland, OR: Willan; Van Ness, D., & Strong, K. (2006). 19. Petersilia, J., Turner, S., Kahan, J., & Peterson, J. (1985). Restoring justice (3rd ed.). Cincinnati: Anderson; Bilchik, Granting felons probation: Public risks and alternatives. Santa S., Bazemore, G., & Umbreit, M. (1997). Balanced and Monica, CA: Rand. restorative justice for juveniles: A framework for juvenile justice 20. Latessa, E., Travis, L., Fulton, B., & Stichman, A. (1998). in the 21st century. Washington, DC: Office of Juvenile Jus- Evaluating the prototypical ISP: Final report. Cincinnati: Uni- tice and Delinquency Prevention. versity of Cincinnati and American Probation and Parole 36. Braithwaite, see note 35; Bazemore, G., & Griffiths, C. Association. (1997). Conferences, circles, boards, and mediations: The 21. Humphrey, J. A., Burford, G., & Dye, M. H. (2012). A lon- ‘new wave’ of community justice decision making. Federal gitudinal analysis of reparative probation and recidivism. Probation, 61, 25–37. Criminal Justice Studies, 25(2), 117–130. 37. Levrant, S., Cullen, F., Fulton, B., & Wozniak, J. (1999). 22. Fulton, B., Latessa, E., Stichman, A., & Travis, L. (1997). Reconsidering restorative justice: The corruption of benev- The state of ISP: Research and policy implications. Federal olence revisited? Crime & Delinquency, 45, 3–27. Probation, 61, 65–76. 38. Clear, T. (2005). Places not cases? Re-thinking the proba- 23. Petersilia, J., & Turner, S. (1993). Evaluating intensive super- tion focus. Howard Journal, 44, 172–184. vision probation/parole: Results of a nationwide experiment. 39. Crawford, A., & Clear, T. (2001). Community justice: Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice. Transforming communities through restorative justice? In 24. Petersilia, J., & Turner, S. (1990). Comparing intensive G. Bazemore & M. Schift (Eds.), Restorative community jus- and regular supervision for high-risk probationers: Early tice (pp. 127–149). Cincinnati, OH: Anderson. results from an experiment in California. Crime & Delin- 40. Morse, W. (1939). The attorney general’s survey of release quency, 36, 105. procedures. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing 25. Deschenes, E., Turner, S., & Petersilia, J. (1995). Intensive Office. community supervision in Minnesota: A dual experiment in 41. Kaeble et al., see note 4. prison diversion and enhanced supervised release. Washington, 42. Glaze & Bonczar, see note 3, p. 37. DC: National Institute of Justice; Steiner, B. (2004). Treat- 43. Maxwell, A. (2015, July 6). The parole process. Retrieved ment retention: A theory of post-release supervision for the from https://www.doc.ks.gov/prb/process. substance abusing offender. Federal Probation, 68, 24–29; 44. U.S. Department of Justice (2010, September). Audit of Burrow, L., Joseph, J., & Whitehead, J. (2001). A compar- the federal bureau of prisons’ furlough program. Retrieved ison of recidivism in intensive supervision and regular from https://oig.justice.gov/reports/BOP/a1044.pdf; Aba- probation. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the dinsky, H. (2008). Probation and parole (10th ed.). Upper Academy of Criminal Justice Sciences, Washington, DC. Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall. 26. National Institute of Justice. (1999). Keeping track of elec- 45. Piehl, A. (2009). Preparing prisoners for employment: tronic monitoring. Washington, DC: National Law Enforce- The power of small rewards. Manhattan Institute for Pol- ment and Corrections Technology Center; Stutzman, R. icy Research. Retrieved from http://www.manhattan-insti (2002, December 29). Ankle monitors show a higher rate tute.org/html/cr_57.htm; Cheliotis, L. (2009). Before the of success. Orlando Sentinel, p. A15. next storm: Some evidence-based reminders about tem- 27. House Arrest Services. (n.d.). Home page. Retrieved from porary release. International Journal of Offender Therapy and http://www.housearrest.com. Comparative Criminology, 53, 420–432. 28. Corbett, R., & Marx, G. (1991). Critique: No soul in the 46. Visher, C., & Travis, J. (2003). Transitions from prison to new machine: Technofallacies in the electronic monitor- community: Understanding individual pathways. Annual ing movement. Justice Quarterly, 8, 400. Review of Sociology, 29, 89–114. 29. Mahoney, B., Green, J., Greene, J., & Eigler, J. (1996). How 47. Petersilia, J. (2009). When prisoners come home: Parole and to use structured fines (day fines) as an intermediate sanction. prisoner reentry. New York: Oxford University Press; Aba- Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Assistance. dinsky, see note 44.

48. Castro, H. (2003, January 8). Sex offender registry failing. 10. Smith, B. L., & Damphousse, K. R. (1996). Punishing Seattle Post-Intelligencer. Retrieved from http://seattlepi political offenders: The effect of political motive on fed- .nwsource.com/local/103212_register08.shtml. eral sentencing decisions. Criminology, 34(3), 289–321; 49. Associated Press. (2008, February 1). Police: Convicted Smith, B. L., Damphousse, K. R., Jackson, F., & Sellers, A. sex offender rapes boy at Massachusetts library. Retrieved (2002). The prosecution and punishment of international from http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,327590,00 terrorists in federal courts: 1980–1998. Criminology and .html. Public Policy, 1(3), 311–338. 50. Bureau of Justice Assistance. (n.d.). Homelessness and 11. National Commission on Terrorist Attacks Upon the prisoner re-entry. Retrieved from https://www.prisonle United States. (2003). The 9/11 Commission Report. New galnews.org/news/publications/bureau-of-justice-assis York: W. W. Norton; p. 4. tance-homelessness-and-prisoner-reentry/. 12. Strom, K., & Eyerman, J. (2007). Interagency coordination 51. Veysey, B. M., Ostermann, M., & Lanterman, J. L. (2014). in response to terrorism: Promising practices and barriers The effectiveness of enhanced parole supervision and com- identified in four countries. Criminal Justice Studies, 20(2), munity services New Jersey’s serious and violent offender 131–137. reentry initiative. The Prison Journal, 94(4), 435–453. 13. Pew Research Center for the People and the Press. (2006). 52. Morrissey v. Brewer, 408 U.S. 471 (1972). The 2004 political landscape: Evenly divided and increasingly 53. Kaebel et al., see note 4. polarized. Washington, DC: Pew Research Center. 54. Solomon, A., Kachnowski, V., & Bhati, A. (2005). Does 14. Swift, A. (2015, December 16). Americans more worried parole work: Analyzing the impact of postprison supervision on about terrorism than mass shootings. Retrieved from rearrest outcomes. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute. http://www.gallup.com/poll/187688/americans-wor 55. Ostermann, M. (2015). How do former inmates perform ried-terrorism-mass-shootings.aspx?g_source=TERROR in the community? A survival analysis of rearrests, recon- ISM&g_medium=topic&g_campaign=tiles. victions, and technical parole violations. Crime & Delin- 15. Institute for Economics and Peace. (2015). Global ter- quency, 61(2), 163–187. rorism index 2015. Retrieved from http://static.vision- 56. Raphael, S., & Stoll, M. (2004). The effect of prison releases ofhumanity.org/sites/default/files/2015%20Global%20 on regional crime rates. In W. Gale & J. Pack (Eds.), Brook- Terrorism%20Index%20Report.pdf. ings-Wharton papers on urban affairs 2004. Washington, 16. Hoffman, B. (2006). Inside terrorism (2nd ed.). New York: DC: Brookings Institution Press. Columbia University Press; Emerson, S. (2002). American 57. Visher & Travis, see note 46. jihad: The terrorists living among us. New York: Free Press; 58. Wilson, J., & Davis, R. (2006). Good intentions meet hard National Commission on Terrorist Attacks Upon the realities: An evaluation of the Project Greenlight reentry United States. (2003). The 9/11 Commission Report. New program. Criminology and Public Policy, 5, 303–338. York: W. W. Norton; p. 4; O’Block, R. Timeline of terror- 59. Wilson, J. (2007, June). Habilitation or harm: Project ism: A historical overview of events related to radical-Is- Greenlight and the potential consequences of correctional lamic-based terror. Retrieved from http://www.acfei.com programming. NIJ Journal. Retrieved from http://www.ojp /images/PDF/Final%20Timline%20of%20T.%20color .usdoj.gov/nij/journals/257/habilitation-or-harm.html. .pdf; Jihad Watch. (2007). Al-Qaeda claims murder of Benazir Bhutto. Retrieved from https://www.jihadwatch .org/2007/12/al-qaeda-claims-murder-of-benazir-bhutto. Chapter 13 17. U.S. Department of Justice. (2006, June 23). Examples of 1. Harrell, E. (2015). Victims of identity theft, 2014. Retrieved terrorism convictions since Sept. 11, 2001. Retrieved from from http://www.bjs.gov/content/pub/pdf/vit14.pdf. http://www.usdoj.gov/opa/pr/2006/June/06_crm_389 2. Federal Bureau of Investigation. (2005). Terrorism .html. 2002–2005. U.S. Department of Justice. Retrieved from 18. Homeland Security Office of Intelligence and Analysis. http://www.fbi.gov/stats-services/publications/terror (2015, November 5). (U//FOUO) Analysis of ISIL-related ism-2002-2005/terror02_05.pdf. arrests in the homeland from January 2014–September 3. Federal Criminal Code (Title 18 U.S.C. § 2331). 2015. Retrieved from https://assets.documentcloud.org 4. Urquhart, F. (2003, October 9). US links put Britain in /documents/2515184/isil-related-arrests-in-homeland front rank for dirty bomb attack by al-Qaeda. The Scots- -from-jan2014.pdf. man, p. 7; Burnett, J., & Whyte, D. (2005). Embedded 19. U.S. Department of Justice. (2006, March 2). Fact sheet: expertise and the new terrorism. Journal for Crime, Conflict USA PATRIOT Act Improvement and Reauthorization and the Media, 1(4), 5. Act of 2005. Retrieved from http://www.justice.gov/opa 5. Gurr, N., & Cole, B. (2000). The new face of terrorism: /pr/2006/March/06_opa_113.html. Threats from weapons of mass destruction. London: United 20. American Civil Liberties Union. (n.d.). Surveillance under Kingdom: I.B. Tauris; p. 30. the PATRIOT Act. Retrieved from https://www.aclu.org 6. Hoffman, B. (1998). Inside terrorism. London, United /infographic/surveillance-under-PATRIOT-act. Kingdom: Indigo; pp. 48–49; Schweitzer, Y., & Shay, S. 21. 50 U.S.C. §§ 1801–1811, 1821–1829, 1841–1846, 1861– (2003). The globalization of terror: The challenge of al-Qaeda 1862. and the response of the international community. London, 22. Aftergood, S. (2011). Federal Intelligence Surveillance Act. United Kingdom: Transaction; p. 3. Retrieved from http://www.fas.org/irp/agency/doj/fisa/. 7. Wilson, C. (2003, October 17). Computer attack and 23. House of Representatives Judiciary Committee. (n.d.). cyber terrorism: Vulnerabilities and policy issues for Con- USA Freedom Act. Retrieved from https://judiciary.house gress. U.S. Congressional Research Report RL32114; p. 4. .gov/issue/usa-freedom-act/. Retrieved from http://www.fas.org/irp/crs/RL32114.pdf. 24. Department of Homeland Security. (2015). Securing 8. Kane, J., & Wall, A. (2005). Identifying the links between our homeland: U.S. Department of Homeland Security white-collar crime and terrorism. Retrieved from http://www strategic plan fiscal years 2014–2018. Retrieved from .ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/nij/grants/209520.pdf. https://www.dhs.gov/sites/default/files/publications 9. D’Souza, D. (2002). What’s so great about America. Wash- /FY14-18%20Strategic%20Plan.PDF. ington, DC: Regnery. 25. Federal Bureau of Investigation, see note 2.

26. Transportation Security Administration. (2015). Transpor- 48. Wilson, see note 7. tation Security Overview. Retrieved from https://www.dhs 49. Public Safety Canada. (2002, January 30). Terrorist inter- .gov/transportation-security-overview. est in water supply and SCADA systems. Retrieved from 27. US Customs and Border Protection agency (n.d.). About http://www.publicsafety.gc.ca/cnt/ntnl-scrt/index-en CBP. Retrieved from https://www.cbp.gov/about. .aspx. 28. Immigration and Customs Enforcement. (2011). ICE over- 50. Department of Homeland Security. (2003, January). The view. Retrieved from http://www.ice.gov/about/overview/. national strategy to secure cyberspace; p. x. Retrieved from 29. U.S. Department of Homeland Security. (2016). Opera- http://www.us-cert.gov/reading_room/cyberspace_strat tional and support components. Retrieved from https:// egy.pdf. www.dhs.gov/operational-and-support-components#. 51. Berkshire District Attorney. (2010). Identity theft. Com- 30. Kane & Wall, see note 8. monwealth of Massachusetts. Retrieved from http://www 31. Leson, J. (2005). Assessing and managing the terrorism threat: .mass.gov/ago/consumer-resources/consumer-informa New realities. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice. tion/scams-and-identity-theft/identity-theft/understand 32. Chapman, R., Baker, S., Bezdikian, V., Cammarata, P., ing-id-theft.html. Cohen, D., et al. (2002). Local law enforcement responds to 52. Brown seeks identity theft law. (2002, June 2). New York terrorism: Lessons in prevention and preparedness. Washing- Law Journal, p. 9. ton, DC: U.S. Department of Justice; Thatcher, D. (2005). 53. Associated Press. (2006, September 20). Task force recom- The local role in homeland security. Law and Society mends steps to curb identity theft. USA Today, p. 5A. Review, 39(3), 635–676. 54. Newman, G. (2004). Identity theft. Washington, DC: U.S. 33. Lynn, P. (2005). Mutual aid: Multijurisdictional partnerships Department of Justice. for meeting regional threats. Washington, DC: U.S. Depart- 55. Allison, S., Schuck, A., & Lersch, K. (2005). Exploring the ment of Justice. crime of identity theft: Prevalence, clearance rates, and 34. Ortiz, C., Hendricks, N., & Sugie, N. (2007). Policing ter- victim/offender characteristics. Journal of Criminal Justice, rorism: The response of local police agencies to homeland 33(1), 19–29. security concerns. Criminal Justice Studies, 20(2), 91–109. 56. McDonald, P. (2006, May). National strategy to combat 35. Mayhood, K. (2006, July 15). Ohio sweep nets 154. identity theft. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Columbus Dispatch, p. B1. Office of Community Oriented Policing Services. 36. Nugent, M. E., Johnson, J., Bartholomew, B., & Bromirski, 57. Baum, K. (2007, November). National crime victimization D. (2005). Local prosecutors’ response to terrorism. Washing- survey: Identity theft, 2005. NCJ 219411. Washington, DC: ton, DC: U.S. Department of Justice. U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics. 37. Nugent et al., see note 36. 58. Pollock, J., & May, J. (2002). Authentication technology: 38. Hamdan v. Rumsfeld, 548 U.S. 557 (2006). Identity theft and account takeover. FBI Law Enforcement 39. Maras, M-H. (2011). Computer forensics: Cybercriminals, Bulletin, 71(6), 1–4. laws and evidence. Sudbury, MA: Jones & Bartlett. 59. Miller, J. (2014, October 17). Latest Obama order aims 40. CBS/AP. (2015, November 10). Three charged for larg- to combat identity theft, data breaches. Retrieved from est-ever bank data breach. Retrieved from http://www http://www.cbsnews.com/news/latest-obama-order-aims- .cbsnews.com/news/three-charged-for-jpmorgan-data to-combat-identity-theft-data-breaches/. -breach-the-largest-ever/. 41. Backman, M. (2014, September 18). Home Depot: 56 million cards exposed in breach. Retrieved from http:// Chapter 14 money.cnn.com/2014/09/18/technology/security 1. Statement by FBI Director J. Edgar Hoover, warning /home-depot-hack/. against “misguided policies which encourage criminal 42. Yang, J. L., & Jayakumar, A. (2014, January 10). Tar- activity and often result in arrogant and defiant attitudes get says up to 70 million more customers were hit by by youth.” As cited in Bernard, T. (1992). The cycle of juve- December data breach. Retrieved from https://www nile justice. New York: Oxford University Press; p. 34. .washingtonpost.com/business/economy/target-says 2. Retrieved from http://www.sentencingproject.org/wp -70-million-customers-were-hit-by-dec-data-breach -content/uploads/2016/01/NJJDPC-Juvenile-Justice-Rec -more-than-first-reported/2014/01/10/0ada1026-79fe ommendations-for-Congress-2011.pdf. -11e3-8963-b4b654bcc9b2_story.html. 3. Federal Bureau of Investigation. (2015). Crime in the 43. Kelion, L. (2014, September 7). Apple toughens iCloud United States, 2014. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of security after celebrity breach. Retrieved from http://www Justice. .bbc.com/news/technology-29237469. 4. Federal Bureau of Investigation, see note 3, Table 36. 44. Federal Criminal Code (Title 18 U.S.C. § 1030). 5. Wolfgang, M., Figlio, R., & Sellin, T. (1972). Delinquency 45. Computer Crime and Intellectual Property Section. (n.d.). in a birth cohort. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; About CCIPS. U.S. Department of Justice. Retrieved from Wolfgang, M., Thornberry, T., & Figlio, R. (1987). From https://www.justice.gov/criminal-ccips/about-ccips. boy to man, from delinquency to crime. Chicago: University 46. Computer Crime and Intellectual Property Section, see of Chicago Press; Dinitz, S., & Conrad, J. (1980). The note 45. dangerous two percent. In D. Shichor & D. Kelly (Eds.), 47. National Intellectual Property Law Enforcement Coor- Critical issues in juvenile delinquency (pp. 129–155). Lex- dination Council. (2006, September). Report to the ington, MA: Lexington Books; Nevares, D., Wolfgang, M., President and Congress on coordination of intellectual & Tracy, P. (1990). Delinquency in Puerto Rico: The 1970 property enforcement and protection. Retrieved from birth cohort study. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press; Shan- https://www.justice.gov/archive/opa/pr/2006/Septem non, L. (1982). Assessing the relationships of adult criminal ber/06_opa_657.html; United States Attorney’s Office, careers to juvenile offenders: A summary. Washington, DC: District of Colorado. (2006, June 20). Department of U.S. Government Printing Office. Justice creates new computer hacking and intellectual 6. Deuteronomy 21:18–21. (2001). The Holy Bible, English property units in seven cities. U.S. Department of Justice. Standard Version. Wheaton, IL: Crossways Bibles. Retrieved from https://www.justice.gov/archive/usao/co 7. Ludwig, F. (1955). Youth and the law. New York: Founda- /news/2006/June06/6_20_06.html. tion Press; p. 12.

8. Sanders, W. (1970). Juvenile offenders for a thousand years. 35. Sickmund, M. (2010). Juveniles in residential placement, Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press. 1997–2008. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice. 9. Tobias, J. (1967). Crime and industrial society in the 19th 36. Sickmund, M., & Puzzanchera, C. (Eds.). (2014). Juvenile century. New York: Shocken Books. offenders and victims: 2014 national report. Pittsburgh, PA: 10. Hawes, J. (1971). Children in urban society: Juvenile delin- National Center for Juvenile Justice. Retrieved from http:// quency in nineteenth-century America. New York: Oxford www.ojjdp.gov/ojstatbb/nr2014/downloads/chapter6 University Press; pp. 15–19. .pdf. 11. Hawes, see note 10, p. 14. 37. Sickmund & Puzzanchera, see note 36. 12. Ariès, P. (1962). Centuries of childhood (trans. by R. Bal- 38. Sedlak, A., & Bruce, C. (2010). Youth’s characteristics and dick). New York: Knopf; pp. 411–412. backgrounds: Findings from the survey of youth in residential 13. Ariès, see note 12. placement. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice. 14. Haskins, G. (1968). Law and authority in early Massachu- 39. Snyder & Sickmund, see note 32, p. 232; Snyder, H. setts. New York: Archon Books. (2004). An empirical portrait of the youth reentry popula- 15. Platt, A. (1969). The Child Savers: The invention of delin- tion. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, 2, 39–55. quency. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. 40. Goodstein, L., & Sontheimer, H. (1997). The implementa- 16. Dorne, C. (1989). Crimes against children. New York: Har- tion of an intensive aftercare program for serious juvenile row and Heston; p. 30. offenders. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 24, 332–359. 17. New York Society for the Reformation of Juvenile Delin- 41. Howell, J. (2003). Preventing and reducing juvenile delinquents. (1832). Documents relative to the house of refuge. quency: A comprehensive framework. Thousand Oaks, CA: New York: Mahlon Day. Sage. 18. Brace, C. (1880/1970). The dangerous classes of New York 42. Hockenberry & Puzzanchera, see note 22. and twenty years’ work among them. New York: Wynkoop 43. Regoli et al., see note 23. and Hellenbeck; O’Connor, S. (2001). Orphan trains. Bos- 44. Feld, B. (1999). Bad kids: Race and the transformation of the ton: Houghton-Mifflin. juvenile court. New York: Oxford University Press. 19. Carter, R. (1976). The police view of the justice system. In 45. Mears, D. (2003). A critique of waiver research: Critical next M. Klein (Ed.), The juvenile justice system (p. 131). Beverly steps in assessing the impacts of laws for transferring juve- Hills, CA: Sage. niles to the criminal justice system. Youth Violence and Juve- 20. Brown, R. (2005). Black, white, and unequal: Examining nile Justice, 1, 156–172; Snyder & Sickmund, see note 32. situational determinants of arrest decisions from police– 46. Kent v. United States, 383 U.S. 541 (1966). suspect encounters. Criminal Justice Studies, 18, 51–68; 47. Kent v. United States, see note 46. Resig, M., McCluskey, J., Mastrofski, S., & Terrill, W. 48. Breed v. Jones, 421 U.S. 519 (1975). (2004). Suspect disrespect toward the police. Justice Quar- 49. Thomas, C., & Bilchik, S. (1985). Prosecuting juveniles in terly, 21, 241–268; Piliavin, I., & Briar, S. (1964). Police criminal courts: A legal and empirical analysis. Journal of encounters with juveniles. American Journal of Sociology, Criminal Law and Criminology, 76, 439–479. 70, 206–214; Alpert, G., MacDonald, J., & Dunham, R. 50. Rudman, C., Hartstone, E., Fagan, J., & Moore, M. (1986). (2005). Police suspicion and discretionary decision mak- Violent youth in adult court: Process and punishment. ing during citizen stops. Criminology, 43, 407–434. Crime & Delinquency, 32, 75–96; Reed, D. (1983). Needed: 21. National Advisory Committee for Juvenile Justice and Serious solutions for serious juvenile crime. Chicago: Chicago Delinquency Prevention. (1976). Juvenile justice and delin- Law Enforcement Study. quency prevention. Washington, DC: U.S. Government 51. Cohen, T., & Reaves, B. (2006). Felony defendants in large Printing Office. urban counties, 2002. Washington, DC: U.S. Department 22. Hockenberry, S., & Puzzanchera, C. (2015). Juvenile court of Justice; p. 24; Champion, D. (1992). The juvenile jus- statistics 2013. Retrieved from http://www.ojjdp.gov tice system. New York: Macmillan; p. 583; Rudman et al., /ojstatbb/nr2014/downloads/chapter6.pdf. see note 48, p. 86; Bishop, D., Frazier, C., & Henretta, J. 23. Regoli, R., Hewitt, J., & DeLisi, M. (2010). Delinquency in (1989). Prosecutorial waiver: Case study of a questionable society (8th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill; p. 426. reform. Crime & Delinquency, 35, 180. 24. Puzzanchera et al., see note 22 52. Grisso, T., & Schwartz, R. (2000). Youth on trial: A develop- 25. Feld, B. (2000). Cases and materials on juvenile justice mental perspective on juvenile justice. Chicago: University of administration. St. Paul, MN: West; p. 313. Chicago Press; Grisso, T., Steinberg, L., Woolard, J., Cauff- 26. Austin, J., Johnson, K., & Weitzer, R. (2005). Alternatives to man, E., Scott, E., Graham, S., et al. (2003). Juveniles’ secure detention and confinement of juvenile offenders. Wash- competence to stand trial: A comparison of adolescents’ ington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice. and adults’ capacities as trial defendants. Law and Human 27. Puzzanchera et al., see note 22 Behavior, 27, 333–363; Poythress, N., Lexcen, F., Grisso, 28. Krisberg, B., Schwartz, I., Litsky, P., & Austin, J. (1986). The T., & Steinberg, L. (2006). The competence-related abili- watershed of juvenile justice reform. Crime & Delinquency, ties of adolescent defendants in criminal court. Law and 32, 5–38; Krisberg, B., DeComo, R., Herrera, N., Steketee, Human Behavior, 30, 88. M., & Roberts, S. (1991). Juveniles taken into custody: Fis- 53. Champion, D. (1992). The juvenile justice system. New cal year 1990 report. San Francisco: National Council on York: Macmillan; p. 92. Crime and Delinquency. 54. Clement, M. (1997). A five-year study of juvenile waiver 29. Schall v. Martin, 467 U.S. 253 (1984). and adult sentences: Implications for policy. Criminal Jus- 30. In re Gault, 387 U.S. 1 (1967). tice Policy Review, 8, 201–219; Kurlychek, M., & Johnson, 31. McKeiver v. Pennsylvania, 403 U.S. 528 (1971). B. (2004). The juvenile penalty: A comparison of juvenile 32. Snyder, H., & Sickmund, M. (2006). Juvenile offenders and and young adult sentencing outcomes in criminal court. victims: 2006 national report. Pittsburgh: National Center Criminology, 42, 485–517; Fagan, J. (1996). The compara- for Juvenile Justice; p. 198. tive advantage of juvenile versus criminal court sanctions 33. Hockenberry & Puzzanchera, see note 22. on recidivism among adolescent felony offenders. Law 34. Hockenberry, S., Sickmund, M., & Sladky, A. (2009). Juve- and Policy, 18, 77–114; Barnes, C., & Franze, R. (1989). nile residential facility census, 2006: Selected findings. Wash- Questionably adult: Determinants and effects of the juve- ington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice. nile waiver decision. Justice Quarterly, 6, 117–135.

55. Daugherty, C. E. (2015). Zero tolerance: How states com- 59. Evan v. Miller, 567 U.S. (2012). ply with PREA’s youthful inmate standard. Retrieved from 60. Montgomery v. Louisiana, 577 U.S. (2016). http://cfyj.org/images/pdf/Zero_Tolerance_Report.pdf. 61. Barnes, R. (2016, January 25). Supreme Court: Life sen- 56. Forst, M., Fagan, J., & Vivona, T. S. (1989). Youth in pris- tences on juveniles open for later reviews. Washington ons and training schools: Perceptions and consequences Post. Retrieved from https://www.washingtonpost.com of the treatment–custody dichotomy. Juvenile and Family /politics/courts_law/supreme-court-juveniles-sentenced Court Journal, 40, 1–14. -to-life-have-option-for-new-reviews/2016/01/25/06e3d 57. Eisikovits, Z., & Baizerman, M. (1982). ‘Doing time’: Violent fc2-c378-11e5-8965-0607e0e265ce_story.html. youth in a juvenile facility and in an adult prison. Journal of 62. Regoli et al., see note 23. Offender Counseling, Services and Rehabilitation, 6(10), 9. 63. Eddings v. Oklahoma, 455 U.S. 104 (1982). 58. Heide, K., Spencer, E., Thompson, A., & Solomon, E. 64. Thompson v. Oklahoma, 487 U.S. 815 (1988). (2001). Who’s in, who’s out, and who’s back: Follow-up 65. Stanford v. Kentucky, 492 U.S. 361 (1989). data on 59 juveniles incarcerated in adult prison for mur- 66. Roper v. Simmons, 543 U.S. 551 (2005). der or attempted murder in the early 1980s. Behavioral Sci- 67. Regoli et al., see note 23. ences and the Law, 19, 97–108.