June 10, 2021 A
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
The Pennsylvania State University the Graduate School College of The
The Pennsylvania State University The Graduate School College of the Liberal Arts CITIES AT WAR: UNION ARMY MOBILIZATION IN THE URBAN NORTHEAST, 1861-1865 A Dissertation in History by Timothy Justin Orr © 2010 Timothy Justin Orr Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy May 2010 The dissertation of Timothy Justin Orr was reviewed and approved* by the following: Carol Reardon Professor of Military History Dissertation Advisor Chair of Committee Director of Graduate Studies in History Mark E. Neely, Jr. McCabe-Greer Professor in the American Civil War Era Matthew J. Restall Edwin Erle Sparks Professor of Colonial Latin American History, Anthropology, and Women‘s Studies Carla J. Mulford Associate Professor of English *Signatures are on file in the Graduate School ii ABSTRACT During the four years of the American Civil War, the twenty-three states that comprised the Union initiated one of the most unprecedented social transformations in U.S. History, mobilizing the Union Army. Strangely, scholars have yet to explore Civil War mobilization in a comprehensive way. Mobilization was a multi-tiered process whereby local communities organized, officered, armed, equipped, and fed soldiers before sending them to the front. It was a four-year progression that required the simultaneous participation of legislative action, military administration, benevolent voluntarism, and industrial productivity to function properly. Perhaps more than any other area of the North, cities most dramatically felt the affects of this transition to war. Generally, scholars have given areas of the urban North low marks. Statistics refute pessimistic conclusions; northern cities appeared to provide a higher percentage than the North as a whole. -
PNGMM Newsletter 22
Pennsylvania National Guard Military Museum Building T-8-57, Fort Indiantown Gap Annville, Pennsylvania 17003-5003 (717) 861-2402 PNG MILITARY MUSEUM NEWSLETTER NO.# 22-2015 WWW.PNGMILITARYMUSEUM.ORG CELEBRATING 28 YEARS OF SERVICE TO THE COMMUNITY BOARD OF DIRECTORS INDEX MG Walter F. Pudlowski (USA, Ret.), President The First Wedding 2 Mr. Charles B. Oellig, Museum Director & Curator PA Air National Guard preserves their history 4 Brig. Gen. Stanley J. Jaworski, (USAF, Ret.), Vice- President Ms. Stephanie L. Olsen, Treasurer TSgt Ted Nichols II, Secretary Obituaries of two long term museum friends 5 LTC Richard H. Shertzer, (USA, Ret.), Membership COL Sam Hayes PNGMM 7th Upcoming Golf Tournament 7 Col Carl Magagna (USAF, Ret.) Col. David J. Smoker (USAF, Ret) LTC Jonathan DeVries Farewell to the Red Keystone 11 MAJ Chuck Holbrook (USA, Ret.) Donations 12 WO4 David A. Sakmar Book Review: The Brotherhood that Binds the Brave 15 SGM Herman W. Clemens (USA, Ret.) Museum Membership 16 SGT Damian J. M. Smith Financial Donations 17 Ms. Sharon E. Flaig Ms. Rita Meneses Electronic Newsletter Available 17 Mr. John E. Schreffler Museum Tour Groups 17 Ms. Shannan D. Zerance Museum Wish List 18 Museum Calendar 18 Advisors (Non-Voting Members) Curator’s Corner 19 Mr. Stephen John Bushinski, Esq., Legal Counsel Maj. Gen. James M. Skiff, (USAF, Ret.), Board Member, Hours and Directions 20 Emeritus NEWSLETTER & MEDIA STAFF Ms. Rita Meneses, Editor, Cultural Resources Manager SGT Damian J. M. Smith, Articles/Photos/Command Historian Ms. Carolyn O’Day Malfara, Webmaster PAGE 2 PENNSYLVANIA NATIONAL GUARD MILITARY MUSEUM 22-2015 Fort Indiantown Gap Military Reservation located in THE FIRST WEDDING Pennsylvania. -
Pennsylvania Historical and Museum Commission Guide to Civil War Holdings
PENNSYLVANIA HISTORICAL AND MUSEUM COMMISSION GUIDE TO CIVIL WAR HOLDINGS 2009 Edition—Information current to January 2009 Dr. James P. Weeks and Linda A. Ries Compilers This survey is word-searchable in Adobe Acrobat. 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS Acknowledgements……………………………………………………………..page 3 Introduction by Dr. James P. Weeks………………………………….………...page 4 How to Use this Guide….………………………………………………………page 6 Abbreviations………….……………………..………………………….………page 7 Bureau of Archives and History State Archives Division, Record Groups………………………………..……....page 8 State Archives Division, Manuscript Groups…………………………………...page 46 State Archives Division, Affiliated Archives (Hartranft) ………………………page 118 PHMC Library …………………….……………………………………………page 119 Bureau of The State Museum of Pennsylvania Community and Domestic Life Section……………….………………………..page 120 Fine Arts Section……………………………………….…….…………...…… page 120 Military History Section……………………………….……..…………………page 126 Bureau of Historic Sites and Museums Pennsylvania Anthracite Heritage Museum………………………….……..…..page 131 Drake Well Museum Eckley Miner’s Village Erie Maritime Museum Landis Valley Museum Old Economy Village Pennsylvania Military Museum Railroad Museum of Pennsylvania Bureau for Historic Preservation State Historical Markers Program………………………………………………page 137 National Register of Historic Places and Register of Historical Landmarks……………………………….………………. ………………….…page 137 3 Acknowledgements This survey is a result of the PHMC Scholar-in-Residence (SIR) Program. In 2001, Diane Reed, Chief of the Commission’s Publications and Sales Division proposed that a book be created telling the story of Pennsylvania during the Civil War using the vast holdings of the PHMC. In order to create the book, an overview of the PHMC Civil War holdings was necessary. A SIR collaborative project was funded early in 2002, and Dr. James P. Weeks of the Pennsylvania State University History Department was chosen to create the survey, working with Linda Ries of the Archives staff. -
High Water Mark Heroes, Myth, and Memory
High Water Mark Heroes, Myth, and Memory D. Scott Hartwig In his address at the dedication of the 20th Maine monument in 1889 Joshua Chamberlain said to the gathered group: In great deeds something abides. On great fields something stays. Forms change and pass; bodies disappear; but spirits linger, to consecrate ground for the vision- place of souls. And reverent men and women from afar, and generations that we know not of, heart-drawn to see where and by whom great things were suffered and done for them, shall come to this deathless field, to ponder and dream, and lo! The shadow of a mighty presence shall wrap them in its bosom, and the power of the vision pass into their souls.1 The power of Chamberlain’s words still echo at Gettysburg. Something does remain here on the Gettysburg battlefield. Something felt, not seen. And as Chamberlain foresaw, men and women that he and his comrades would not know have come, and continue to come, to this place in numbers that might have surprised him, to “ponder and dream,” but also to understand, and perhaps find something of themselves upon these fields. There are many evocative places on the battlefield. It is a unique landscape in its own right which the battle, with its post-war memorials and monuments, only rendered more exceptional. Yet it is one of its seemingly most unremarkable places that holds the greatest power and symbolism for those who visit the battlefield. Known variously as the High Water Mark, the Angle, the Clump of Trees, or the Copse of Trees, it is the place where the final great bid for Confederate victory at Gettysburg – Pickett’s Charge – was smashed and thrown back on the steamy afternoon of July 3, 1863. -
Nomination Form
NPS Fo,m t~tcJO.tl 0MB No 1024-0011 (Jan INT} VLR Accepted: 10/8/1991 // NRHP Accepted: 2/6/1992 United States Department of the Interior National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Multiple Property Documentation Form NATiONJ\t REG1STER This form is for use in documenting multiple property groups relating to one or several historic contexts. See instructions in Guidelines for Completing National Register Forms (National Register Bulletin 16). Complete each item by marking "x" in the appropriate box or by entering the requested information. For additional space use continuation sheets (Form 10-900-a). Type all entries. A. Name of Multiple Property Listing Army of the Potomac Winter Encampment, Culpeper and Fauquier Counties, 1863-1864 B. Associated Historic Contexts Civil War Winter Encampments in Culpeper and Fauquier Counties C. Geographical Data Culpeper and Fauquier Counties, Virginia D See continuation sheet D. Certification As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, as amended, I hereby certify that this documentation form meets the National Register documentation standards and sets forth requirements for the listing of related operties consistent with the National Register criteria. This submission meets the procedural and professional require nts t forth i~~ ~Ff Part 60 and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Planning and Evaluati:n . rrul.w V4:,1~1c,1r? 4 Signature of c rtifying official Date Director, VA Department of Historic Resources State or Federal agency and bureau I, hereb , certify that this multiple property documentation form has been approved by the National Register as a basis for eva ating related roperties for listing in the National Register. -
The Commemoration History of the Battle of Antietam, 1862-1937
TO GUARD IN PEACE: THE COMMEMORATION HISTORY OF THE BATTLE OF ANTIETAM, 1862-1937 David K. Graham A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate College of Bowling Green State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF ARTS May 2011 Committee: Scott Martin, Advisor Andrew Schocket © 2011 David K. Graham All Rights Reserved iii ABSTRACT Scott Martin, Advisor The following essay covers the commemoration and history of remembrance of the Battle of Antietam from immediately following the battle to its seventy-fifth anniversary celebration. In some respects, this work is a case study of larger themes and topics on Civil War memory in that it attempts to shed light on how memory of the war evolved and reflected the time in which it took place. Throughout the work I focus on a few key themes. One of those central themes is the politicization of Antietam’s commemoration. During the seventy-five year period covered in the following essay, politicians and partisans used commemoration and monumentalization as an avenue to express both sectional and party political rhetoric. However, the central argument I put forth revolves around the issue of anti-southern sentiment among Union veterans. Previous and contemporary historians argue that during the 1880s and 1890s a spirit of reunion and reconciliation swept across the American landscape and with the culminating effect of the Spanish-American War, the chasm between the North and South closed. Conversely, I argue that although reconciliation dominated the late nineteenth-century, anti-southern sentiment and rhetoric persisted well into the twentieth-century. -
December 13, 2007, the One Hundred and Forty-Seventh Year of the Civil War
Old Baldy Civil War Round Table of Philadelphia December 13, 2007, The One Hundred and Forty-Seventh Year of the Civil War tle facing us. We real- “Glory and Me” ized that membership had dropped off and A Professor’s Short Love/ many members were Hate Affair with Hollywood reluctant to attend The December meeting of the Old meetings, fi nancially Baldy Civil War Round Table will be the Round Table was held on Thursday, December 13 start- on a shaky footing, ing at 7:30 PM at the Civil War and and we believed that Underground Railroad Museum at the real purpose of the 1805 Pine Street in Philadelphia. The organization was not speaker will be Gregory J. W. Urwin only to hold meet- and the subject will be "Glory and Me" ings but to donate to This is an insider’s look at the mak- battlefi eld preserva- ing of Glory, the epic, Oscar-winning tion. Even though it film about the 54th Massachusetts seemed as if we were Volunteer Infantry, the Union Army’s facing insurmountable most famous black regiment in the odds, no one was will- Civil War. Professor Urwin equipped and trained thirteen ing to pull the trigger – so we took the plunge and decided of his black students to participate in filming the climactic to give it a shot. Fort Wagner assault sequence and he commanded them In a moment of weakness, I agreed to accept the posi- and other black extras while portraying one of the 54th’s tion of President with a number of huge caveats: that Don white officers. -
Remembrance and Reconciliation
Remembrance and Reconciliation From the first commemorative activities of the wartime generation to the present day, the legacy of the Civil War continues to reflect the enduring power of both “history,” an intellectual endeavor that prizes critical thinking and seeks objective truth, and “memory,” which rests on emotion rather than reason and is often subjective, sanitizing, and selective. As later generations viewed the war through these two very different sets of lenses, the efforts to remember those who participated often stirred controversy along with commemoration. Mary Shellman placing a flag and flowers on the grave of a Union soldier in Westminster, c.1890 (Historical Society of Carroll County) REMEMBERING THE DEAD The ebb and flow of battle across the Maryland region created a serious problem for those communities left to deal with war’s most lethal legacy, that of burying the dead. For many, this became a sacred duty, and for years after the end of the conflict, soldiers’ final resting places evolved into something more: shrines of remembrance. At Antietam, Ball’s Bluff, and Gettysburg, national cemeteries preserve the memory of the Union dead. Gettysburg established its burial ground first – a site on Cemetery Hill (part of the battlefield already crowned by the town’s Evergreen Cemetery), and Pennsylvania Governor Andrew Curtin solicited support from the other Northern states. Although designated the Soldiers’ National Cemetery, state governors demanded recognition of their individual states’ sacrifices; thus, architect William Saunders divided the concentric semicircles of graves into state plots, plus two for unknown soldiers and one for U.S. Regulars. Samuel Weaver was employed to superintend the exhumation and Sign marking the spot where Union identification of the bodies of Union soldiers. -
Army of the Potomac Essay
Essential Civil War Curriculum | Lawrence A. Kreiser, Jr., The Army of the Potomac | October 2014 The Army of the Potomac By Lawrence A. Kreiser, Jr., Stillman College Ask anyone interested in American history to name the most formidable army of the Civil War and a lively debate is likely to ensue. Many people will argue for the Confederate Army of Northern Virginia. Led by General Robert E. Lee, the Army of Northern Virginia fought ferociously and came closer than any other Rebel army to winning the war for the Confederacy. Other scholars and fans of the Civil War will advocate for the Union Army of the Tennessee. From Shiloh to Atlanta and beyond, the Army of the Tennessee, in the words of its leading historian, knew “nothing but victory.”1 Fewer people will claim the Union Army of the Potomac as the premier fighting force of the Civil War. Upon making the argument, they might face a rather vigorous counter attack. Search the Internet for the Army of the Potomac, and descriptions such as “bumbling;” “overwhelming numbers;” and “disappointment” appear with a surprising frequency. Yet the Army of the Potomac deserves a claim as the best army of the Civil War because it accomplished the most difficult tasks. Between 1861 and 1865, the Army of the Potomac defended Washington, D.C., captured Richmond, Virginia—the Confederate capital—and destroyed Lee’s army. These three accomplishments came at a staggering human cost. At Antietam in 1862, the Union army lost 12,400 soldiers killed, wounded, and missing in one day of combat. -
Sedgwick Memorial Association; 6Th Army Corps
E ./ ii Class Book. 9^c>T 2-? 7 ^-7 V edeojieS // emoriaf (3i%so(Bm\ion ARMY CORPS pette^fuQFiiQ Q©Jdrt ^©Mge, ^et, Cfl&^ M, i^ Qfid is, ii^i. Front View of Monument. INSCRIPTION ON MONUMENT. SEDGWICK. Maj. Genl. John Sedgwick, born Cornwall, Litchfield Co., Conn.. Sept. 13th, 1813. Cadet U. S. Mil. Acmy. July 1st, 1833. 2nd Lieut., 2nd Arty., July 1st, 1837. 1st Lieut., 2nd Arty., Apl. 19, 1839. Captain 2nd Arty, Jan. 26th, 1849. Maj. 1st Cav'ly, Mar. 8th, 1855. Lieut. Col. 2nd Cal'vy, Mar. 16th, 1861. Col. 1st Cal'vy, Apl. 25th, 1861. Brig. Genl. TJ. S. Vols., Aug. 31st, 1861. Maj. Genl. U. S. Vols., July 4, 1862. SIXTH AKMY CORPS. Dedicated May r2th, 1887, on the 23rd anniversary of the heaviest days' fight at Spottsylvania. A tribute to a beloved comraander l)y the survivors of his corps and their friends. Erected to commemorate this spot where Maj. Genl. .John Sedgwick, U. S. Vols., commanding Sixth Army Corps was killed in action on the morning of the 9th of May, 1864. 4 \i\ DUNLAP & CLARKE, PRINTERS, 819 & 821 Filbert St., Philadelphia. DEDICATORY PROCEEDINGS. Introduction, The spot where Sedgwick fell, in the vicinity of Spottsyl- vania Court House, slumbered in fovgetfulness, until General Humphreys, in his investigations, preparatory to the prepara- tion of his substantial and relial:ft»* historic narrative of the ^'Virginia Campaigns of '64 and '65/' first brought it to atten- tion. He visited the locality about 1874, and causing a rough houlder to be rolled to the spot to identify it, subsequently " described it in his work as follows : The skirmishers and sharpshooters were very active on both sides, and in the morn- ing [May 9th] General Sedgwick was killed, close to the en- trenchments, at the right of his Corps, but not under cover, at the point where the forks of the road in Alsop's field unite." Following the direction from which the Union army ap- proached the battle-field, it is really where the forks re-unite. -
Douglas Egerton to Deliver Keynote at Lincoln Dinner
LINCOLN MEMORIAL ASSOCIATION NEWSLETTER Volume 48 • Number 2 Winter 2020 Douglas Egerton to Deliver Keynote at Lincoln Dinner The Watchorn Lincoln Memorial Association is pleased to welcome Dr. Douglas R. Egerton as the 88th Watchorn Lincoln Dinner speaker. Dr. Egerton is Professor of Early American and 19th Century United States History at Le Moyne College in Syracuse, New York. He will discuss President Abraham Lincoln and the recruitment of African American soldiers. A graduate of Georgetown University, Dr. Egerton has focused his research on the intersections between race and politics in early American history. He cites a conversation with his grandmother, the daughter of a Confederate veteran, as the impetus for his interest in writing and teaching about race relations in the African Americans and early American South. After watching the Revolutionary America; television show Roots, Dr. Egerton recalls and Thunder at the Gates: his “normally soft spoken grandmother became The Black Civil War Regiments that Redeemed furious about the way in which the Old South was America, which was awarded the Gilder-Lehrman depicted. She assured me that they, meaning the Lincoln Prize in 2017. planter class, were ‘always kind to our people,’ The Watchorn Lincoln Dinner will take place an inadvertent admission that African American on Wednesday, February 12, 2020 at University of slaves were indeed human property.” Redlands’s Orton Center. Attendance to the Lincoln Dr. Egerton has published numerous works Dinner is $49 for members of the Lincoln Memorial on the topic, including Years of Meteors: Stephen Association who join or renew in January 2020, and Douglas, Abraham Lincoln, and the Election $59 for the general public. -
The Life of Paddy Yank: the Common Irish-American Soldier in the Union Army
THE CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY OF AMERICA The Life of Paddy Yank: The Common Irish-American Soldier in the Union Army A DISSERTATION Submitted to the Faculty of the Department of History School of Arts and Sciences Of The Catholic University of America In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree Doctor of Philosophy By James Zibro Washington, D.C. 2016 The Life of Paddy Yank: The Common Irish-American Soldier in the Union Army James Zibro, Ph.D. Director: Timothy J. Meagher, Ph.D. Nearly 150,000 Irish-born men served as soldiers in the Union army during the American Civil War and since the nineteenth-century, Irish soldiers have been a popular topic of scholarly study. Yet despite the abundance of publications on Irish service, the Civil War, and on Irish America, we know little, if anything about the common Irish-born Union soldier. Indeed, most publications provide little sophisticated analysis and nearly all recycle nineteenth-century stereotypes of Irish immigrants. This study attempts to fill the void in the literature, contributing to the understanding of common Civil War soldiers as well as the history of the Irish in America. Using regimental descriptive books – a source long-ignored by many scholars studying Irish Civil War service – as well as pension and census records, the author constructed a longitudinal social-mobility study of Irish-born soldiers in ethnic Union regiments. In doing so, the study ascertains the typical profile of the Irish immigrant soldier in the sample, the characteristics of his soldiering, and his postwar experience. The data suggests that the typical Irish-born volunteer does not fit the description laid out by previous scholars.