DOCSLIB.ORG

Information Sheet

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Information Sheet INFORMATION SHEET CONSTITUTIONAL RECOGNITION OF TASMANIAN ABORIGINAL PEOPLE JUNE 2016 The Premier and Minister for Aboriginal Affairs, Will Hodgman MP, has announced a proposed amendment to the Tasmanian Constitution to provide for constitutional recognition of Tasmanian Aboriginal people. What is constitutional recognition? The draft amendment to the preamble of the Tasmanian Constitution Act 1934 is a factual statement that acknowledges and recognises the significant history of Tasmanian Aboriginal people. The draft amendment is consistent with the recommendations of the House of Assembly Standing Committee on Community Development Inquiry into the Constitutional Recognition of Aboriginal People as Tasmania’s First People, tabled in November last year. Tasmania is the only state in Australia that has not already provided for constitutional recognition of Aboriginal people. The Tasmanian Government views constitutional recognition as an important symbolic statement, although it is only one part of its package of reforms in relation to Aboriginal affairs that aims to make a real difference to outcomes for Tasmanian Aboriginal people. The draft amendment is set out in full on the second page of this Information Sheet. Have your say The Tasmanian Government wants to hear your views on the draft amendment to the Tasmanian Constitution. Feedback is open until Friday 29 July 2016 and can be forwarded to the Department of Premier and Cabinet by: Email: [email protected] Mail: Policy Division, DPAC Department of Premier and Cabinet GPO Box 123 HOBART TAS 7001 For further information, please contact the Policy Division of the Department of Premier and Cabinet by telephone on (03) 6232 7550. Draft amendment The draft amendment to the preamble of the Constitution Act 1934 is set out below. The proposed amendment is shown as underlined text. The underlined text would be inserted into the existing preamble as shown. Preamble Whereas by an Act of Council intituled an Act to establish a Parliament in Van Diemen's Land and to grant a Civil List to Her Majesty (known as the Constitutional Act and later as the Constitution Act) passed in the eighteenth year of the reign of Her Majesty Queen Victoria by the Governor and Legislative Council of the Colony of Van Diemen's Land in pursuance of the provisions of an Imperial Act called the Australian Constitution Act 1850, it was enacted for the purpose of securing the peace, welfare, and good government of the said Colony, that in place of the said Legislative Council there should be one Legislative Council and one House of Assembly, constituted as therein provided, which should exercise all the powers and functions of the then existing Legislative Council, and that the Governor and Legislative Council and House of Assembly together should be called the Parliament of Van Diemen's Land:And whereas Her said Majesty Queen Victoria, by Order-in-Council directed that, on and after 1st January 1856, the name of the said Colony should be changed to Tasmania:And whereas by force of the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act 1900, the said Colony, on the establishment of the said Commonwealth, was constituted and became a State of the Commonwealth of Australia:And whereas many of the provisions of the Constitution Act have been repealed or replaced, and numerous amendments have been made therein, and it is desirable to make certain other amendments therein, and that the said Act and its amendment should be consolidated in one Act: Whereas the Parliament, on behalf of all the people of Tasmania, acknowledges Aboriginal people as Tasmania’s First People and the traditional and original owners of Tasmanian lands and waters; recognises the ongoing spiritual, social, cultural and economic importance of traditional lands and waters to Tasmanian Aboriginal people; and recognises the unique and lasting contribution that Tasmanian Aboriginal people make to Tasmania. Be it therefore enacted by His Excellency the Governor of Tasmania, by and with the advice and consent of the Legislative Council and House of Assembly, in Parliament assembled, as follows: GPO Box 123 HOBART TAS 7001 Phone: 03 6232 7550 Email: [email protected] Visit: www.dpac.tas.gov.au .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Office of the Governor Annual Report 2014
    Office of the Governor of Tasmania Annual Report 1 July 2014- 30 June 2015 Government House Hobart Available on the Office of the Governor website: www. ovhouse. tas. ov. au Table of Contents Table of Contents 1 Letter ofTransmittal 3 Mission 4 Objectives The Office of the Governor 4 Overview 4 Organisational Structure 4 Functions of the Office 5 Corporate Governance 5 Output Report 6 Output 1. 1 Support of the Governor 6 Financial Performance 6 Performance Indicators for Output 1.1 6 Qualitative Assessment 7 Key Activities - Results 7 The Year in Review 8 Constitutional 8 Administration in the absence of the Governor 10 Ceremonial 11 Visitors to Government House 13 Significantevents 13 School and community groups 19 Official callers and DiplomaticVisits 20 Recqrtions 22 Monthly State Rooms and garden tours 24 Government House productivity and training services 24 External events 25 The Government House website 28 The Government House Estate 28 Staff 29 Honorary Aides-de-Camp 30 Human Resource Management 31 Indicators of OrganisationalHealth 31 - Sick Leave and Overtime 31 - Staff Turnover 31 -Staff Leave 31 - Workers' Compensation 31 StaffEnterprise Agreement and StaffAward 31 Training and Development 32 Training Services 32 Industrial Relations 32 Work Health and Safety 32 Asset Management and Risk Policies 32 Asset Management 32 Maintenance and Capital Programs 33 Asset Management Systems 33 Acquisition and Disposal ofAssets 33 Risk Management 33 Government Procurement - Support for Local Business 33 Supplementary Information 33 Pricing
    [Show full text]
  • Strategy-To-Win-An-Election-Lessons
    WINNING ELECTIONS: LESSONS FROM THE AUSTRALIAN LABOR PARTY 1983-1996 i The Institute of International Studies (IIS), Department of International Relations, Universitas Gadjah Mada, is a research institution focused on the study on phenomenon in international relations, whether on theoretical or practical level. The study is based on the researches oriented to problem solving, with innovative and collaborative organization, by involving researcher resources with reliable capacity and tight society social network. As its commitments toward just, peace and civility values through actions, reflections and emancipations. In order to design a more specific and on target activity, The Institute developed four core research clusters on Globalization and Cities Development, Peace Building and Radical Violence, Humanitarian Action and Diplomacy and Foreign Policy. This institute also encourages a holistic study which is based on contempo- rary internationalSTRATEGY relations study scope TO and WIN approach. AN ELECTION: ii WINNING ELECTIONS: LESSONS FROM THE AUSTRALIAN LABOR PARTY 1983-1996 By Dafri Agussalim INSTITUTE OF INTERNATIONAL STUDIES DEPARTMENT OF INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS UNIVERSITAS GADJAH MADA iii WINNING ELECTIONS: LESSONS FROM THE AUSTRALIAN LABOR PARTY 1983-1996 Penulis: Dafri Agussalim Copyright© 2011, Dafri Agussalim Cover diolah dari: www.biogenidec.com dan http:www.foto.detik.com Diterbitkan oleh Institute of International Studies Jurusan Ilmu Hubungan Internasional, Fakultas Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik Universitas Gadjah Mada Cetakan I: 2011 x + 244 hlm; 14 cm x 21 cm ISBN: 978-602-99702-7-2 Fisipol UGM Gedung Bulaksumur Sayap Utara Lt. 1 Jl. Sosio-Justisia, Bulaksumur, Yogyakarta 55281 Telp: 0274 563362 ext 115 Fax.0274 563362 ext.116 Website: http://www.iis-ugm.org E-mail: [email protected] iv ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This book is a revised version of my Master of Arts (MA) thesis, which was written between 1994-1995 in the Australian National University, Canberra Australia.
    [Show full text]
  • The Australian Head of State: Putting Republicanism Into the Republic
    The Australian Head of State: Putting Republicanism into the Republic The Australian Head of State: Putting Republicanism into the Republic* Harry Evans A reasonably detached observer could be forgiven for thinking that the Australian republican movement is floundering. The arguments against sharing a nominal head of state with another country, which is now a member of a foreign quasi-federation, seemed so irresistible. Why does the movement fall so far short of the degree of popular support required to carry the change? A large part of the explanation is provided by a lack of coherence in the official republican movement, which is illustrated by the head of state issue.1 Having proclaimed that the monarchy must go, and that we must have an Australian president, the movement immediately founders on the question of how the replacement is to be chosen. The response of a large majority of Australians, according to the polls, is that they want to elect a president.2 The official republicans recoil in horror from such a suggestion, resort to irrational arguments against it, and speak of the need to re-educate the public.3 It has to be explained to the people that we are making the change in such a way as to avoid changing the system of government: an odd argument for any kind of reformers attempting to persuade people to change anything. Never * This article was first published in Agenda, vol. 3, no. 2, 1996. Harry Evans is the Clerk of the Senate. 1 The conclusions of the official movement are contained in a statement by the Prime Minister, the Hon.
    [Show full text]
  • A Constitutional Convention (Year 7)
    LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY FOR THE AUSTRALIAN CAPITAL TERRITORY Office of the Legislative Assembly Civics and Citizenship—Australian curriculum The Australian Constitution—A Constitutional Convention (Year 7) Civic Square, London Circuit GPO Box 1020, Canberra ACT 2601 Phone (02) 6205 3016 Email [email protected] www.parliament.act.gov.au Facebook @ACTAssembly Twitter @ACT_Assembly Table of Contents A Constitutional Convention ............................................................................................................... 1 Australian curriculum ................................................................................................................................ 1 Introduction ............................................................................................................................................... 1 Learn about the Australian Constitution ............................................................................................... 1 Case study on the Australian Constitution ............................................................................................ 3 Reforming the Australian Constitution .................................................................................................. 4 Possible topics for proposed Constitutional changes ........................................................................... 5 Conducting a referendum ...................................................................................................................... 6 Reflection
    [Show full text]
  • Structure and Ideology in the Tasmanian Labor Party
    Structure and Ideology in the Tasmanian Labor Party: Postmaterialism and Party change ,- By Peter James Patmore LL.B., Dip. Crim. Submitted in fulfilment of the requirements fo r the degree of Doctor of Philosophy University of Tasmania, March 2000 II This thesis contains no material which has been accepted for a degree or diploma by the University or any other institution, except by way of background information and duly acknowledged in the thesis, and to the best of my knowledge and belief no material previously pubJished or written by another person except where due acknowledgment is made in the text ofthe thesis. ................�................. �---=;,.......... Peter Patmore 23" February 2000. III This thesis is not to be made available for loan or copying for two years fo llowing the date this statement is signed. Following that time the thesis may be made available for loan and limited copying in accordance with the Copyright Act 1968. Peter Pa tmore 23'" February 2000 iv ABSTRACT The Tasmanian Labor Party has found itself, like many western social democratic parties, recently subject to challenge; not from its traditional enemy, the economic right, but froma new postmaterialist left. This thesis considers the concept of postmaterialism, its rise and role in the fo rmation of new ecocentric political parties, and its impact on the structure, ideology and electoral strategy of the Tasmanian Labor Party. Maurice Duverger's typology of political parties has been used to elucidate and consider the characteristics and fo rmation of political parties and the importance of electoral systems - particularly proportional representation - in achieving representational success.
    [Show full text]
  • Archives Office of Tasmania GOVERNOR's OFFICE
    Archives Office of Tasmania GUIDE TO THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF TASMANIA SECTION TWO GOVERNOR’S OFFICE by P.R. Eldershaw HOBART ARCHIVES OFFICE OF TASMANIA 1958 (Reprinted 2000) © STATE of TASMANIA, ARCHIVES OFFICE OF TASMANIA Other Guides in this series Section One, Colonial Secretary’s Office Section Three, Convict Department Section Four, Records Relating to Free Immigration CONTENTS INTRODUCTION.............................................................................................................................................I THE GOVERNOR'S OFFICE ............................................................................................................................. I NOTE ON TRANSFERS............................................................................................................................ XXXIX PART 1 – DESPATCHES, 1818-1932 ............................................................................................................ 1 A. - DESPATCHES RECEIVED.......................................................................................................................... 4 B. - DESPATCHES SENT ................................................................................................................................ 13 PART 2 - CORRESPONDENCE RECORDS, 1820-1932.......................................................................... 19 A. - CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED.............................................................................................................. 21 B. CORRESPONDENCE
    [Show full text]
  • No. 1 TUESDAY, 22 JUNE 2021
    No. 1 TUESDAY, 22 JUNE 2021 A SESSION OF THE PARLIAMENT OF TASMANIA, COMMENCED AND HOLDEN IN THE CITY OF HOBART ON TUESDAY THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF JUNE IN THE SEVENTIETH YEAR OF OUR SOVEREIGN LADY, QUEEN ELIZABETH THE SECOND AND IN THE YEAR OF OUR LORD TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE. PARLIAMENT OF TASMANIA 1 COUNCIL MEETS.⎯ On which day being the first day of the meeting of this Session of Parliament for the despatch of business, pursuant to Proclamation hereunder annexed, the Council met at eleven o’clock in the forenoon. 2 PARLIAMENT OPENED BY COMMISSION. ⎯ Her Excellency’s Commissioners, the Honourable Ruth Jane Forrest, the Honourable Leonie Anne Hiscutt and the Honourable Tania Verene Rattray appointed by Her Excellency the Governor, having been introduced to the Council Chamber by the Usher of the Black Rod, Timothy Alan Mills, and being seated on the dais, the Honourable Ruth Jane Forrest in the centre with the Honourable Leonie Anne Hiscutt on her right hand, and the Honourable Tania Verene Rattray on her left hand; the Clerk of the Council read Her Excellency’s Proclamation, as follows:⎯ A PROCLAMATION WHEREAS by the Constitution Act 1934 it is provided that the Governor shall call the Parliament of Tasmania together for the despatch of business after every general election of members of the Assembly, within 90 days after the dissolution of the Assembly. AND WHEREAS the Assembly was dissolved on 26 March 2021 and a general election of members of the Assembly was held on 1 May 2021 AND WHEREAS it is expedient that I call Parliament
    [Show full text]
  • Tasmanian Government Submissions to Inquiries and Reviews PRINCIPLES
    Tasmanian Government Submissions to Inquiries and Reviews PRINCIPLES Preparing a Tasmanian Government submission to an Inquiry or Review can require significant resources. It may present an important opportunity to influence policies or strategies in areas significant to the State. These principles provide a common framework for departments to consider when assessing whether to prepare a Tasmanian Government submission. This should be read in conjunction with the associated ‘Process’ document. The two documents are designed to assist departments to work together and apply a consistent approach to Inquiries and Reviews. Definition and coverage These principles should be used to assess all Inquiries, Reviews and calls for submissions undertaken by: Tasmanian statutory or Parliamentary committees; Australian Government departments and statutory bodies, the Commonwealth Parliament, various Commissions or special Inquiries; and non-government organisations or international bodies. Exclusions: Matters related to international treaties entered into by the Australian Government, and Commonwealth-State Agreements – these have their own processes (available at www.dpac.tas.gov.au/divisions/policy/intergovernmental_relations). Although the principles should always be applied, the associated process will not apply in all cases. See the ‘Process’ document for relevant exemptions. How to use these principles The principles must be weighed against each other to assess whether a submission is justified. Sometimes only one principle will be satisfied but it will be significant enough to justify making a submission. In other cases, multiple principles may be satisfied, but to an insufficient degree to justify the diversion of resources to prepare a submission. Senior departmental officials are expected to use professional judgment in applying these Principles, and to consult central agency officials where there are queries or concerns about the application of the Principles.
    [Show full text]
  • Submission to Tasmanian Industrial Commission Parliamentary Salaries and Allowances Graeme Lindsay P O Box 170 Deloraine 7304 W
    Submission to Tasmanian Industrial Commission Parliamentary Salaries and Allowances Graeme Lindsay P O Box 170 Deloraine 7304 Whips – There should be no additional payment made to Whips. This is for 2 reasons. Firstly, the definition of ‘whip’ as it pertains to Parliament in the Oxford Dictionary (1998) is as follows; an official of a political party appointed to maintain parliamentary discipline amongst its members, especially as to ensure attendance and voting in debates. As a party whip works for the benefit of his or her party, any additional remuneration should be paid by the political party with no cost incurred by the taxpayer. Secondly, while a historic position brought from England (its lower house has 650 members) the current size of the House of Assembly (25 members) with the Liberal party holding 13 seats does not justify the position of a whip or any additional salary. With the opposition having smaller numbers in the House, this is even more applicable. If a political party consisting of nine ministers, one Speaker, one Parliamentary Secretary, one backbencher and, currently, a government whip cannot organise attendance and voting at ‘debates’ without a whip, then one would have to question their abilities. This applies to the Opposition whip as well, although I would suggest that this position does not act for all members who are not part of the dominant party. Secretary to Cabinet There are two questions relating to this position, unnecessary in the current parliament. 1. What is the role and duties of this position? 2. What is the relationship between this position and the Premier, Cabinet Office and Office of the Secretary of the Department of Premier and Cabinet? Currently no member of parliament is recognised as the Secretary to Cabinet in the Tasmanian Parliament website.
    [Show full text]
  • Equal Representation in Electoral
    VOTE WEIGHTING IN ELECTORAL SYSTEMS: THE ‘ONE VOTE, ONE VALUE’ DEBATE IN WESTERN AUSTRALIA Norman John Patrick Kelly A dissertation presented as part of the requirements for the award of the degree of Bachelor of Social Sciences (Politics) (Honours) within the Faculty of Media, Society and Culture of the Curtin University of Technology, 2004. November 2004 One Vote, One Value ii Declaration I declare that this Honours thesis is my own work and has not been submitted in any form for another degree or diploma at any university or other institute of tertiary education. Information derived from the published or unpublished work of others has been acknowledged in the text and a list of references is given. Norman John Patrick Kelly 1 November 2004 One Vote, One Value iii Acknowledgements I would like to express my thanks to my supervisors, Associate Professor David Charnock and Dr Alan Fenna – David, particularly for assisting in the development of the scope and direction of the thesis, and theoretical perspectives; and Alan, for your willingness to step in at a late stage of the project. Thank you to the staff at Curtin, particularly Dr Philip Moore and Dr Patrick Bertola, who always responded promptly and effectively to my long- distance requests. Thanks also to Karin Hosking and Liz Foster, for your technical guidance in the preparation of the thesis, and to the staff at the Parliamentary Library of Western Australia, and Members’ staff, for your ready assistance. Special thanks go to my interview participants, who generously gave of their time to openly discuss matters that were of particular political sensitivity.
    [Show full text]
  • House of Assembly Wednesday 19 September 2018
    Wednesday 19 September 2018 The Speaker, Ms Hickey, took the Chair at 10 a.m., acknowledged the Traditional People, and read Prayers. RECOGNITION OF VISITORS Madam SPEAKER - Honourable members, it is my great pleasure to welcome the Sergeant- at-Arms, the Chief Librarian and research officers from the Parliament of Samoa who the parliament is hosting this week through the United Nations development program as part of our parliament's twinning relationship with the Parliament of Samoa. Aloha and welcome to our parliament. Members - Hear, hear. Madam SPEAKER - We also welcome Miendetta Primary School grades 4, 5 and 6 to the Chamber. Members - Hear, hear. QUESTIONS Royal Hobart Hospital - Patient Accommodation Ms WHITE question to MINISTER FOR HEALTH, Mr FERGUSON [10.07 a.m.] You have so chronically underfunded the health and hospital system that your latest plan to address the crisis you have created is to put patients at the Royal Hobart Hospital in store rooms and alcoves and give them hand bells. How can you justify this plan and how can this be acceptable in any modern health and hospital system? ANSWER Madam Speaker, I thank the Leader of the Opposition for her question. Yes, we saw her coming. This is a desperate attempt to run yet another medi-scare campaign against the Tasmanian people. The Leader of the Opposition could not have misrepresented what our local clinicians have circulated for consultation more than she just did. It is appalling that you attack our doctors and nurses for seeking to implement solutions in our hospital. I will begin immediately by debunking the notion that the Government is chronically underfunding health.
    [Show full text]
  • Tasmanian Global Education Growth Strategy
    Tasmanian Global Education Growth Strategy Department of State Growth Contents Message from the Minister ...................................................................................................... 2 Introduction: The Tasmanian Global Education Growth Strategy ................................. 4 Why a global education growth strategy?............................................................................................................4 Why Tasmania? ........................................................................................................................... 6 Governance ................................................................................................................................. 8 Tasmanian Global Education Growth Strategy ................................................................... 9 Vision .......................................................................................................................................... 10 Purpose ...................................................................................................................................... 10 Goals and actions ......................................................................................................................11 Goal 1: Leverage Tasmania’s brand as a study destination .....................................................................11 Goal 2: Strengthen industry partnerships and pathways ..........................................................................12 Goal 3: Enhance
    [Show full text]