City Government Finances in 1965-66

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

City Government Finances in 1965-66 --'~"J-"'-" ~. 1:~ ":-:-~-. '-.:. ::~ .•...,.~ .• ,..I• GOVERNMENTAL FINANCES /GF No. 12 ,,_ •• II'. It' •• • • ....I' P ••.. • • •• ..•• .", "", ~ ~:. " v n' f," \ I ~ I • tI I •. i"I J • [ J 1\ f I Hl:!~~~~ ! \ I i! (, \ i : CITY GOVERNMENT FINANCES IN 1965-66 u.s. DEPARTMENT OF COM't'lERCE, Alexander B. Trowbridge, Secretary William H. Shaw, Assistant Secrltary, Economic Affairs BUREAU OF THE CENSUS. A. Ross Eckler, Director I, I' t ,I ,• 1 • BUREAU OF THE CENSUS A. ROSS ECKLER, Director HOWARD C. GRIEVES, Deputy Director Governments Division David P. McNeli s, Acting Chief ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Many staff members of the Governments Division participated in the preparation of this report. Statistics for the 43lar gest cities, and also for a limited proportion of smaller municipalities, were assembled by the Compilation Branch, headed by Francis M. Twiss. Other city finance data were examined by the Surveys Branch, headed by Kenneth E. Anderson. The Processing Division of the Bureau carried out machine pro ce ssrng work in accordance with specifications prepared by Sherman Landau of the Governments Division. Tabulation work within the Governments Division was handled mainly by the Management and Operations Branch, headed by Marjorie Ball. Lynden Mannen reviewed t he publication copy. Grateful acknowledgment is made of the cooperation of the numerous municipal finance officials who kindly provided information f or this report. July 1967 Library of Congress Catalog Card Number: 34-2B211 SUGGESTED CITATION U.S. Bureau of the Census, City Government Finances IN 1965-66. Series GF-No. 12. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C., 1967. For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, Government Printing Office Washington, D.C., 20402 - Price 45 cents /I >1- Contents Page Intr oduction .••...... """"""""""". """"""""""""""""". """""""""""""""" 1 Table: 1. --National Summary of City Government Finances: 1965-66 and Prior Periods.. • • • • • • . • • • • . • • • • . • • • • . • • . • • . • . 5 2. --Finances of City ..Operated Utilities: 1965-66................. 6 3. --Selected City Finance Items, by Population-Size Groups: 1965-66""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" 7 4. --Per Capita Amounts of Selected City Finance Items, by Population-Size Groups: 1965-66 ••••.••••••••••••.••••• 8 5. --Finances of Individual Cities and Selected Urban Towns and Townships of over 50, 000: 1965-66 •••.••.••.•...•.••.. 9 6. --Finances of the 43 Largest Cities, in Detail: 1965-66......... 56 7. --Operating Staternent s-o-Utfl.itde s Operated by the 43 Largest Cities: 1965-66 •.•..••••••••••.•••••.•••••.••• 72 Definitions of Selected Terms. • • • • • • • • • • . • . • . • • • • . • • . 75 iii " ; ,> Introduction Revenue of city governments altogether, Sources other than taxes and intergovern- during fiscal 1965-66. amounted to $21.9 bil- mental revenue supplied $3.3 billion of munici- lion. as against $20.3 billion in 1964-65. pal general revenue in fiscal 1965-66. This included $2.1 billion from current charges (other Total revenue consists of all revenue re- than for utility services. classed separately as ceived from external sources by the city lltility revenue). i corporations and their dependent municipal j agencies. including any city-operated utilities f and employee-retirement systems. General I, GENERAL EXPENDITURE • J revenue--i. e., revenue excluding utility and r ' employee-retirement amounts--was approxi- As indicated by table 1, education takes a mately $17.3 billion in fiscal 1965-66. com- larger share of city expenditure than any other pared with $15.9 billion the previous year. function, even though most of this spending is by the small fraction of municipal governments City expenditure totaled $22.4 billion in (including New York City and some other very 1965-66, as against $20.7 billion in 1964-65. large units) that directly administer local public , ' General expenditure--i. e , , spending other 'than schools. In most cities, public schools are ad- for utility and employee-retirement purposes-- ministered by independent school districts, for totaled $17.4 billion in 1965-66. which financial data are not included in this report. National totals on the finances of cities are presented in tables 1 and 2. As suggested by Following is a summary functional distribu- i the column headings. there is some discontin- tion of municipal governments' general expend- uity in the statistics summarized historically iture in fiscal 1965-66: in table 1. Amounts shown there for "1963" pertain to municipal fiscal years which ended ,J, during that calendar year. while amounts shown for the more recent periods pertain to municipal fiscal years which closed within the 12 months Amount Per (millions Per- capita ended June 30 of the later year specified. Function of cent amount Table 3 shows a distribution of financial dollars) (dollars) amounts by city size groups. based on the 1960 Census of Population and 1962 Census of Gov- Total general ernments. 1 Per capita amounts. by city size- expenditure .••...• 17,404 100.0 149.55 groups. appear in table 4. Education••....•...•• 2,747 15.8 23.60 GENERAL REVENUE Police protection ••.• 1,887 10.8 16.21 Highways•..•.•..•.•.• 1,885 10.8 16.20 City-imposed taxes yielded $9.8 billion in Fire protection •.••.• 1,211 7.0 10.41 fiscal 1965-66 or nearly three-fifths of all gen- Sewerage.•..••.....•. 1,100 6.3 9.45 eral revenue of city governments. Property Public welfare .•....• 1,049 6.0 9.01 taxation continued as the predominant revenue Hospitals ••••..•••... 977 5.6 8.40 source supplying $6. 9 billion. Other municipal Parks and recreation. 832 4.8 7.15 tax amounts. as shown in table 1. consisted of Sanitation other than approximately $1.2 billion from general sales sewerage•••..•.••.•. 776 4.5 6.67 and gross receipts taxes. $611 billion from selective sales taxes. and $1. 1 billion from Housing and urban renewal. ••••••.• , ••• licenses and miscellaneous other taxes. 763 4.4 6.56 Interest on general debt................ Municipalities received about $3.3 billion 638 3.7 5.49 from State governments in fiscal 1965-66. This. General control •..•.• 506 2.9 4.35 together with lesser sums received directly Financial adminis- from the Federal Government and frODl other tration .••••..••..•• 304 1.7 2.61 local governments (mainly counties). made the Generltl public total of city intergovernmental revenue $4.1 bil- buildings •.•••..•••• 303 1.7 2.60 lion. or almost one-fourth of general revenue All other functions •• 2,426 13.9 20.85 from all sources. lSize-class distributions of municipal gov- ernments, together with related population fig- Table 1shows annual functional expenditure s ures, are shown nationally and for States and for 1965-66 and selected previous years, with metropolitan areas in GovernmentalOrganization distributions indicating capital outlay amounts (Vol. I of the 1962 Census of Governments). separately for several major functions. i: 1 " , "il ': --, ", 2 Introduction EXPENDITURE BY CHARACTER data for these various type s of utilities are \,," AND OBJECT shown in table 2. In a few States. certain mu- nicipal governments also have liquor store sys- Nearly two-thirds of all municipal expend- tems. Summary figures for these undertakings iture in fiscal 1965-66 (including amounts for appe.ar in table 1. utility and insurance-trust purposes as well as general-government purposes) was for current City utility revenue in fiscal 1965-66 totaled operation. Expenditure of this nature amounted $3.9 billion. including $1. 7 billion for water to $14.9 billion. supply systems and $1.5 billion for electric power systems. Utility expendi.ture amounted Capital outlay--mostly for construction. but to $4.2 billion. of which $2.5 billion was for also including spending for equipment and the current operation. $1. 3 billion was capital out- purchase of land and existing structures-- lay. and the other $374 million was interest on amounted to $4.9 billion. or nearly one-fourth utility debt. of all municipal expenditures. Municipal indebtedness for utilities at the Payments of interest on debt (including utility end of the fiscal year amounted to $11.2 billion. as well as general municipal debt) amounted to or nearly one-third of all city debt outstanding. $1. 0 billion. insurance benefits and repayments were $656 million. and intergovernmental ex- FINANCES OF MUNICIPAL penditure amounted to $268 million. Cash EMPLOYEE-RETIREMENT SYSTEMS assistance payments totaled $587 million. Municipal revenue in 1965-66 included Expenditure for personal services was about employee-retirement revenue of $595 million. $9.8 billion in fiscal 1965-66. and thus ap- consisting of employee contributions and the proached one -half of all municipal expenditure. earnings on retirement system investments. In Personal service costs are mainly for current addition. these retirement systems received operation but include also some amounts for $742 million of employer contributions from personnel engaged in construction wor-k, their parent municipalities (including $18 million of State payments for this purpose). INDEBTEDNESSAND DEBT TRANSACTIONS Benefits and withdrawals paid by municipal retirement systems in 1965-66 totaled $648 At the end of fiscal 1965-66. municipal in- million. and their financial assets at the end of debtedness totaled $33.7 billion. or 5.8 percent the fiscal year amounted to $8.3 billion, as more than a year earlier. The debt total in- shown in table :J... cluded $19.0 billicm of long-term indebtedness pledging the cities
Recommended publications
  • An Algorithm to Measure Daily Bus Passenger Miles Using Electronic Farebox Data
    An Algorithm to Measure Daily Bus Passenger Miles Using Electronic Farebox Data Alex Lu, Alla Reddy Operations Planning New York City Transit Authority Presented at the 90th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board Washington D.C. (2011) T R A N S I T New York City Transit Notice: Opinions expressed in this presentation are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the official New York City Transit policy or position of Metropolitan Transportation Authority or MTA New YorkTRB City Transit. Paper #11-0368 Slide 1 Purpose and Need • Implement 100% electronic data reporting – Monthly “safety module” – Eliminates surveying, data entry, manual checking – More consistent & accurate • Algorithm requirements – Zero manual intervention – Fast: running time of a few minutes per day of data – Rely on schedules and AFC data (no GPS/AVL/APC) Photo: Adam E. Moreira New York City Transit TRB Paper #11-0368 Slide 2 NYCT’s MetroCard AFC Data • “Trip” file 73 bytes per record × about 8,000,000 bus and subway records per weekday = approximately 550 MB per weekday (3am to 2.59am next day) – partial trip records Hypothetical card with bus-only records shown: ....x....1....x....2....x....3....x....4....x....5....x....6....x....7. – no timestamps for 2653058017 20080416 55400 157 027 F02569 1 R482 0 362 2653058017 20080416 63000 157 027 F0027F 1 R480 0 494 cash transactions 2653058017 20080416 73600 157 027 F01E70 2 R494 0 153 2653058017 20080416 160000 157 027 F01E72 2 R494 0 152 2653058017 20080416 161800 157 027 F00214 1 R480 0 494 –
    [Show full text]
  • ATU Local 1056 Reminds Community on Restored Queens Bus Service
    For Immediate Release: Wednesday, January 2, 2013 Contact: Corey Bearak (ATU 1056 Policy & Political Director) (718) 343-6779/ (516) 343-6207 ATU Local 1056 Reminds Community on Restored Queens Bus Service Amalgamated Transit Union (ATU) Local 1056 Queens reminds the public that bus service restorations announced by the MTA last summer get fully implemented next week. ATU 1056 President and Business Agent I. Daneek Miller said the union local wants to make sure Queens residents know they can take advantage of restored service Sunday on the Q24, Q27 and Q36 (extension of route to restore the former Q79) bus routes and Monday on the Q30 and Q42. Miller noted restored service started on the Q76 this past October. ATU 1056 members – bus operators and mechanics – work for MTA New York City Transit's Queens bus division and serve the riding public. “ATU Local 1056 wants the public to know about the return of service once the subject of the misguided and hurtful cuts that affected many communities outside Manhattan,” stated ATU President Miller who noted ATU Local 1056 had organized news conferences, rallies and other events with electeds and community leaders, and testified at hearings to get the MTA to reverse harmful cuts. “We made clear that the dollars existed to restore service in Queens and the facts today make that clear. ATU 1056 will work together with the community, our electeds and our sister transit unions to make sure the MTA delivers what the riding public in Queens needs.” President Miller, who also chairs the MTA Labor Coalition, also thanked the community and their electeds for their advocacy and support throughout this difficult period preceding the service restoration.
    [Show full text]
  • ATU Local 1056, Electeds & Community V. Bus Cuts
    For Immediate Release: Thursday, June 10, 2010 Contact: Corey Bearak (ATU 1056 Policy & Political Director) (718) 343-6779/ (516) 343-6207 ATU Local 1056, Electeds & Community v. Bus Cuts Amalgamated Transportation Union (ATU) Local No. 1056, its president I. Daneek Miller, elected officials including Queens Borough President Helen Marshall and representatives of Council Members James Sanders and Mark Weprin, ATU Local 1179 Vice President John Lyons, the Queens Civic Congress, Community Board 2Q Chair Joseph Conley, Community Board 6 District Manager Frank Gulluscio, Community Board 11 member Steve Behar, Queens civic leaders and concerned residents rallied today to urge the MTA to reverse harmful cuts and eliminations to Queens bus service outside Queens Borough Hall. “At a time when the agency continues to invest funds for Manhattan megaprojects that will make millions for monied interests, our coalition of community, labor and electeds urges the MTA to restore service on these Queens lines: Q14, Q15, Q24, Q26, Q30, Q31, Q42, Q48, Q74, Q75, Q76, Q79, Q89, QM22, QM23, and X51,” stated I. Daneek Miller, president of ATU Local 1056 whichrepresents drivers and mechanics who work for MTA New York City Transit's Queens bus division. “The MTA and its chairman/CEO Jay Walder refuse to exercise other options that would avert these cuts,” explained Mr. Miller. “Instead, they chose to balance their books on the backs of working people who depend on these bus lines each day. The issue is not money; it's policy. The public needs to know MTA chair Walder, once of Queens but late of London, testified to the NYS Assembly that he would NOT (emphasis added) apply new funding or saved resources to restore service cuts and eliminations.
    [Show full text]
  • Testimony to the NYC Traffic Congestion Mitigation Commission
    P.O. Box 238, Flushing, NY 11363 (718) 343-6779 fax: (718) 225-2818 www.queensciviccongress.org [email protected] President: Executive Vice President: Secretary: Treasurer: Corey Bearak Patricia Dolan Seymour Schwartz James Trent Vice Presidents: Founders: Tyler Cassell Richard Hellenbrecht Paul Kerzner David Kulick President Emeritus Sean Walsh Barbara Larkin Audrey Lucas Kathy Masi Nagassar Ramgarib Albert Greenblatt Harbachan Singh Edwin Westley Dorothy Woo Robert Harris FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: Contact: TUESDAY, OCTOBER 30, 2007 Corey Bearak (718) 343-6779 Testimony to the NYC Traffic Congestion Mitigation Commission Presented by Jim Trent, Queens Civic Congress Transportation chair York College, Queens, NY October 30, 2007 Thank you for the opportunity to present the concerns of Queens residents to the NYC Traffic Congestion Mitigation Commission. My name is Jim Trent and I serve as Treasurer and Transportation Committee chair for the Queens Civic Congress, an umbrella organization of more than 110 neighborhood based civic organizations representing property owners, including those owning coops and condos, and tenants who reside in every part of Queens County. The Queens Civic Congress opposes the Congestion Tax. Our Queens Civic Congress Platform, CIVIC 2030, quite succinctly advocates: Maintain free use of all non-TBTA East River and Harlem River bridges for all city residents, and oppose any plan or scheme to impose a tax, fee or toll on vehicles to enter Manhattan such as the "fee" proposed by the Mayor as part of “PlaNYC". As our past-president Sean Walsh wrote in our September newsletter, “The federal grant and the state legislation require any alternative to the congestion tax reduce congestion in Manhattan south of 86th Street by a mere 6.3 percent.
    [Show full text]
  • ATU Local 1056, Queens Electeds, Community Join V. Bus Cuts
    For Immediate Release: Sunday, February 21, 2010 Contact: Corey Bearak (718) 343-6779/ (516) 343-6207 ATU Local 1056, Queens Electeds, Community Join v. Bus Cuts Amalgamated Transportation Union (ATU) Local No. 1056, its President Daneek Miller., Queens elected officials including Member of Congress Gary L. Ackerman, State Senators Frank Padavan and Toby Ann Stavisky, Assembly Member David Weprin, Council Members Leroy Comrie and Mark Weprin, former Council Member Anthony Avella, and representatives of Assembly Member Rory Lancman, Queens civic leaders, including Community 13 Chair Bryan Block and Community Board 8 Vice Chair Martha Taylor, and concerned residents joined with community leaders and concerned residents, come together to oppose the MTA's cuts to Queens bus (and subway) service today (Sunday, February 21, 2010), at noon, at a Q79 bus stop on Little Neck Parkway northwest corner of Union Turnpike in Glen Oaks, Queens. Local 1056 also released the copy (see third page) of a significant ad buy this week to encourage residents to testify at the March 2 MTA hearings. “There the MTA goes again! This time they want to reduce and eliminate bus service throughout Queens. We cannot let these harmful cuts stand at a time when MTA management takes care of folks at top and perpetuates wasteful policies, practices and projects,” stated Mr. Miller. “Tell the MTA NO! Local 1056 and our elected and community leader allies urge residents testify at MTA’s Queens hearing March 2 against the cuts and for using stimulus funding to fund the operations shortful. Make your voices heard.” [Photo Caption - Left to Right: Council Member Mark Weprin, Senator Toby Stavisky, Member of Congress Gary Ackerman, Local 1056 President Daneek Miller, Senator Frank Padavan, Assembly Member David Weprin, Local 1056 Political Action Chair Mel Harris, Local 1056 Vice President Mark Henry.
    [Show full text]
  • Media Survey 2014 Published March 2015
    Copyright © by Market Research Services Limited All rights reserved. No part of this compact disc (CD) covered by the copyrights hereon may be reproduced or copied in any form or by any means – graphic, electronic, or mechanical, including photocopying, taping or information storage and retrieval systems – without written permission of the publisher. Market Research Services Limited 16 Cargill Avenue Kingston 10 Jamaica All Media Survey 2014 Published March 2015 Market Research Services Ltd. All Media Survey 2014 Executive Report Contact Details: Market Research Services Ltd. 16 Cargill Avenue Kingston 10. Tele: 929-6311 or 929-6349 Fax: 960-7753 Email: [email protected] Published: March 2015 All Media Survey 2014 Published March 2015 CONTENTS PAGE # Preface………………………………………………………………………….……………………............ 6-8 Acknowledgements…………………………………………………………………………………….…. 9 Background & Methodology…………………………………………………………………………… 10-12 Glossary of Technical Terms Used………………………………………………………….. ………13 Overview Set Count………………………………….…………………………………………………………………… 15 Potential Audience to Radio, Free To Air (FTA) TV, Local/Regional Cable International Cable (‘000) 2000-2014…………………………………………………………….. 16 Media Interaction (TV, Radio, Newspaper)…...……………………………………………….. 17 Media Share (Radio, FTA TV, Local/Regional Cable, International Cable….......... 18 Media Share (Radio, FTA TV, Local/Regional Cable, International Cable 2012 Vs 2014)…………………………………………………………………………………………………………..19 Tube Share……………………………………………………………………………………………………….20 Average Audience to Radio, FTA
    [Show full text]
  • Students' Willingness to Extend Civil Liberties to Disliked Groups
    University of Tennessee at Chattanooga UTC Scholar Student Research, Creative Works, and Honors Theses Publications 5-2019 Students’ willingness to extend civil liberties to disliked groups NinaSimone Edwards University of Tennessee at Chattanooga, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholar.utc.edu/honors-theses Part of the Political Science Commons Recommended Citation Edwards, NinaSimone, "Students’ willingness to extend civil liberties to disliked groups" (2019). Honors Theses. This Theses is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Research, Creative Works, and Publications at UTC Scholar. It has been accepted for inclusion in Honors Theses by an authorized administrator of UTC Scholar. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Students’ Willingness to Extend Civil Liberties to Disliked Groups Simone Edwards Departmental Honors Thesis The University of Tennessee at Chattanooga Political Science and Public Service Department Examination Date: April 8, 2019 Dr. Amanda Wintersieck UC Foundation Assistant Professor, Political Science Thesis Director Dr. Jessica Auchter UC Foundation Associate Professor, Political Science Department Examiner Dr. Michelle Deardorff Department Head & Adolph S. Ochs Professor of Government, Political Science Department Examiner Table of Contents Abstract………………………………………………………………………….………..…..1 Introduction………………………………………………………………………….…..……2 Literature Review………………………………………………………………….……..…...4 Methodology…………………………………………………………………….………..….15 Data Analysis
    [Show full text]
  • AABB Implementation Package
    MTA Consolidated Additional Actions for Budget Balance - IMPLEMENT ($ in millions) 2010 1 2011 2 Pos Dollars Pos Dollars New York City Transit/Staten Island Railway Administration Managerial 5% Reduction - Bus Service Streamlining 12 0.9 12 1.7 Customer Convenience/Amenities Reduce Station Staffing 450 13.2 330 20.7 Service-Subway Shorten G to Court Square All Times 8 0.1 8 1.4 Increase B Subdiv Headway on Weekends to 10 Minutes 20 1.3 20 2.5 Revise Midday & Evening Guidelines to 125% Seated Load 11 0.4 11 4.2 Increase Headways During 2-5am to 30 Minutes - 0.3 - 3.6 Eliminate W and Extend Q to Astoria 9 0.3 9 3.0 Operate M to Broad St Rush Hrs; Eliminate Z, Add J Local Svce 26 0.2 26 2.4 Service-Buses Express Bus Service Adjustments to Reflect Demand 2 0.1 2 0.3 Eliminate Low Performing Weekend Express Bus Svc 8 0.5 8 0.9 Discontinue Overnight Service on Low Performing Routes 19 1.0 19 2.0 Discontinue Bus to Baretto Park Pool & SIR Baseball Special - 0.1 - 0.1 Reduce Service Span on Low Performing Routes 16 0.8 16 1.6 Restructure Local Bus Routes to Elim Underutilized Segments 51 2.2 51 4.4 Discontinue Weekend Service on Low Performing Routes 131 6.4 131 12.8 Elim or Restruc Local Bus Routes that Duplicate Subway 56 2.9 56 5.8 Discontinue Low Performing Local Routes w/ Alts Available 315 16.3 315 32.6 Bus Maint & Cleaning Positions Assoc with Actions Above 98 0.0 98 0.0 New York City Transit Implement 1,232 $46.7 1,111 $100.0 Long Island Rail Road Service Reductions 58 6.3 58 11.0 Total Long Island Rail Road Implement 58 3 $6.3 58 3 $11.0
    [Show full text]
  • Ton, Hollis Hills Little Neck and Oakland Gardens
    The City of New York Queens Community Board 11 Serving the Communities of Auburndale, Bayside, Douglaston, Hollis Hills Little Neck and Oakland Gardens Eileen Miller Chairperson / Joseph Marziliano District Manager Resolution: Advocating Better Price Equity for North East Queens Long Island Rail Road Customers-To MTA New York City Transit, MTA Long Island Rail Road Whereas, the area covered by Queens Community Board 11 does not have any subway routes nor any +SelectBusService routes, and Whereas, the Port Washington Branch remains the only reliable rail line running through the district, and Whereas, pilot programs already exist for South-East Queens residents to receive reduced fares for travel to Atlantic Terminal, Brooklyn, through Atlantic Ticket, and Whereas, the MetroCard is slated to be completely replaced by the tap-based One Metro New York (OMNY) system by 2023, a system which will include commuter rail service, and Whereas, the borough of Queens is currently undergoing a bus route redesign to improve the quality of service, funded partially through congestion pricing, and Whereas, although we recognize that there are costs to running a rail line, the cost of living has continued to rise for all New York City residents, including those in our district which are burdened by both the cost of a LIRR monthly and an Unlimited MetroCard for commuting, Therefore, be it resolved that: I. OMNY Rollout: Queens Community Board 11 supports the early implementation of OMNY in our community district and neighboring districts in NorthEast Queens. We firmly believe that this would both serve as easier address verification and would increase access to MTA services for community district residents.
    [Show full text]
  • Green Bus Lines
    Analysis of Routes and Ridership of a Franchise Bus Service: Green Bus Lines for New York City Department of Transportation Claire E. McKnight Jose Holguin-Veras Herb Levinson Robert E. Paaswell University Transportation Research Center Region II at City College of New York October 2000 Revised December 2000 Acknowledgments This project could not have been done without the help of a great many people. First of all were the people at New York City Department of Transportation, particularly LuAnn Dunbar, Richard Cohen, and Bill Hough. At Green Bus, we want to thank Doris Drantch, Dave Popiel, Larry Hughes, and Felice Farber. Martin Krieger, Senior Director of Operations Planning, was very generous in sharing with us the ridership numbers for NYCT Queens bus routes. Thurston Clark, Queens Surface, provided information on the electronic fareboxes. Additionally the research team at the University Transportation Research Center consisted of the four authors plus the following associates and students: Andrew Sakawizc Angel Medina Camille Kamga Ellen Thorson Sunanda Patharanage Chang Guan 1: Introduction Ridership on buses throughout New York City has been increasing in the last several years due to the combination of the economic boom and the use of Metrocard which allows passengers to make free transfers between subways and buses. The response to the free transfer was perhaps greater in Queens, where many neighborhoods were far from subways and previously using a bus to access the subway required paying two fares. This “two fare zone,” among other characteristics of Queens, led to the prevalence of the dollar vans, which diverted a significant share of the bus passengers.
    [Show full text]
  • Middlesex Hospital Community Health Needs Assessment
    MIDDLESEX HEALTH Middlesex Hospital Community Health Needs Assessment REPORT FOR YEAR ENDING SEPTEMBER 30, 2019 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Author: Catherine Rees, MPH, Director, Community Benefit, Middlesex Health Many thanks to the following for their participation and input: Contributors: Amber Kapoor, MPH, Health Education and Grants Coordinator, Middlesex Health Cancer Center; Robyn L. Martin, B.S. Public Health, Epidemiology Technician, Infection Prevention and Community Benefit Coordinator, Community Benefit, Middlesex Health; Catherine Martin, Community Benefit Intern, Middlesex Health. Mark Abraham, Executive Director, DataHaven, for assistance with the 2018 DataHaven Community Wellbeing Survey and ChimeData Study. The members of the Middlesex Health Community Health Needs Assessment Advisory Committee: • Reverend Robyn Anderson, Director, • Sheila Daniels, Co-Chair Patient & Family Ministerial Health Fellowship Advisory Council, Middlesex Health PFAC • Wesley Bell, RS, MS, MPH, Director of Health, • Kevin Elak, R.S., Public Health Manager, Cromwell Health Department Middletown Health Department • Monica Belyea, MPH, RD, Program Planner, • Mary Emerling, RN, MPA, Middletown School Opportunity Knocks for Middletown’s Young Health Supervisor, Middletown Public Schools Children, Family Advocacy Maternal Child • Ann Faust, Executive Director, Coalition to End Health, Middlesex Health Homelessness • Ed Bonilla, Vice President of Community • Margaret Flinter, APRN, PhD, c-FNP, FAAN, Impact, Middlesex United Way FAANP, Senior Vice President and
    [Show full text]
  • A Framework for Partnership Between Public Transit and New Mobility Services
    Bundled Mobility Passes: A Framework for Partnership Between Public Transit and New Mobility Services By Apaar Bansal B.S. Civil and Environmental Engineering University of California, Berkeley (2014) Submitted to the Department of Urban Studies and Planning and the Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degrees of Master in City Planning and Master of Science in Transportation at the MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY June 2019 © 2019 Massachusetts Institute of Technology Author ..................................................................................................................................................................... Department of Urban Studies and Planning Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering May 23, 2019 Certified by .............................................................................................................................................................. Jinhua Zhao Edward H. and Joyce Linde Associate Professor of Transportation and City Planning Thesis Supervisor Accepted by ............................................................................................................................................................. Professor of the Practice, Caesar McDowell Co-Chair, MCP Committee Department of Urban Studies and Planning Accepted by ............................................................................................................................................................. Heidi Nepf
    [Show full text]