FERC NOV 20 2015 NRG Chalk Point Order.Pdf
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
20151120-3067 FERC PDF (Unofficial) 11/20/2015 153 FERC ¶ 62,125 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION NRG Chalk Point LLC Docket No. EC15-198-000 NRG Chalk Point CT LLC ORDER AUTHORIZING ACQUISITION AND DISPOSITION OF JURISDICTIONAL FACILITIES (Issued November 20, 2015) On August 28, 2015, NRG Chalk Point LLC (Chalk Point) and NRG Chalk Point CT LLC (Chalk Point CT) (jointly, Applicants) filed an application under section 203(a)(1)(A) of the Federal Power Act (FPA)1 requesting Commission authorization for the disposition of jurisdictional facilities resulting from a proposed transaction (Proposed Transaction) in which Chalk Point CT will acquire ownership and control of an approximately 77 megawatt (MW) generating unit (Facility) at Chalk Point Generating Station in Maryland, and certain associated assets from Southern Maryland Electric Cooperative, Inc. (Southern Maryland Electric). The jurisdictional facilities associated with the Proposed Transaction are certain generator interconnection facilities associated with the Facility and wholesale power sales contracts and books and records related to sales of the output of the Facility. Applicants state that Chalk Point is a Delaware limited liability company. According to Applicants, GenOn Mid-Atlantic, LLC (GenOn Mid-Atlantic) owns all of the membership interests of Chalk Point. Likewise NRG North America LLC owns all of the membership interests of GenOn Mid-Atlantic, and GenOn Americas Generation, LLC (GenOn Americas) owns all of the membership interests NRG North America LLC. NRG Americas Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of GenOn Energy Holdings, Inc. (GenOn Holdings), owns all of the membership interests of GenOn Americas. GenOn Holdings is a wholly owned subsidiary of GenOn Energy, Inc., which is, in turn, a wholly owned subsidiary of NRG Energy, Inc. (NRG). Applicants state that Chalk Point currently operates and leases the Facility from the Southern Maryland Electric. According to Applicants, Chalk Point also owns and operates the remaining units at the Chalk Point Generating Station, which have an aggregate capacity of 2,280 MW. Chalk Point Generating Station is located within the 1 16 U.S.C. § 824b (2012). 20151120-3067 FERC PDF (Unofficial) 11/20/2015 Docket No. EC15-198-000 - 2 - 5004/5005 submarket of the PJM Interconnection, L.L.C. (PJM) market. Chalk Point is an exempt wholesale generator that has obtained authorization from the Commission to sell energy, capacity, and certain ancillary services at market-based rates. According to Applicants, Chalk Point CT is a Delaware limited liability company that was formed for the purposes of acquiring the Facility. NRG is the direct owner of all of the membership interests of Chalk Point CT. Applicants state that Chalk Point CT will be filing an application for authorization to sell energy, capacity, and certain ancillary services and will thus be a public utility under the FPA prior to consummating the Proposed Transaction.2 Applicants state that NRG is a Delaware corporation and an integrated wholesale power generation and retail electricity company whose common stock is publicly traded on the New York Stock Exchange. Applicants represent that they are not aware of any investor or investor group that owns, controls or holds with power to vote 10 percent or more of NRG’s outstanding common stock. According to Applicants, NRG engages in three related electric businesses through various subsidiaries: (1) wholesale power generation and electricity and fuel trading; (2) retail electric supply and demand response; and (3) deployment and commercialization of alternative energy technologies, such as electric vehicle charging infrastructure, distributed solar and smart meter technology. In connection with the first of these business segments, NRG, through various wholly and partially owned subsidiaries, owns or controls over 53,000 MW of electric generating capacity throughout the United States, including approximately 18,590 MW in the PJM market, the relevant market for the Proposed Transaction, where the Facility is located. Applicants state that Southern Maryland Electric is a cooperative utility that receives financing from the Rural Utilities Service under the Rural Electrification Act. According to Applicants, Southern Maryland Electric is thus exempt from FPA section 203 pursuant to section 201(f) of the FPA. Southern Maryland Electric currently owns the Facility and certain associated assets that it leases to Chalk Point. Applicants state that the terms of the Proposed Transaction are set forth in the Asset Purchase Agreement (Purchase Agreement), dated as of October 14, 2013, by and between Southern Maryland Electric and Chalk Point CT. Pursuant to the Purchase Agreement, Chalk Point CT will acquire the Facility and certain associated assets, and the existing lease arrangements relating to the Facility will be terminated. According to Applicants, the Proposed Transaction will thus result in a transfer of ownership of the 2 The Commission approved this filing in NRG Chalk Point CT LLC, Docket No. ER16-10-000 (November 5, 2015) (delegated letter order). 20151120-3067 FERC PDF (Unofficial) 11/20/2015 Docket No. EC15-198-000 - 3 - Facility from Southern Maryland Electric to Chalk Point CT and a transfer of control over the Facility from Chalk Point to Chalk Point CT. According to Applicants, the Proposed Transaction is consistent with the public interest and will have no adverse effect on competition, rates, or regulation. Applicants state that the Proposed Transaction presents no horizontal market power concerns in the PJM market, because the Proposed Transaction is akin to an internal corporate reorganization inasmuch as it simply transfers control over the Facility and associated assets from Chalk Point to Chalk Point CT, which are both wholly owned subsidiaries of NRG. Applicants add that the Proposed Transaction will not result in any change in ultimate control over the Facility and thus does not result in any other corporate entity obtaining ownership or control over the generation facilities of previously unaffiliated entities. Accordingly, Applicants maintain that the Proposed Transaction presents no horizontal market power concerns. Applicants further state that the Proposed Transaction will not have an adverse effect with respect to vertical market power. According to Applicants, the Proposed Transaction does not involve any electric transmission facilities, other than facilities used to interconnect the Facility with the transmission grid, or any other upstream inputs to electricity products and thus presents no vertical market power concerns. Further, none of Applicants or their affiliates owns or controls electric transmission facilities, other than facilities used to interconnect generating facilities with the transmission grid, or inputs to electricity products that could be used to erect barriers to the PJM market. Accordingly, Applicants maintain that the Proposed Transaction presents no vertical market power concerns. According to Applicants, the Proposed Transaction will not have an adverse effect with respect to rates. Applicants state that wholesale sales of the output of the Facility will continue to be made at market-based rates, albeit pursuant to Chalk Point CT’s tariff rather than Chalk Point’s tariff. Applicants add that, through an affiliate, Chalk Point receives cost-based compensation for providing reactive power and voltage support from units at the Chalk Point Generating Station pursuant to Schedule 2 of the PJM Open Access Transmission Tariff (PJM OATT), and the Facility will be included in a revised revenue requirement expected to be filed while this Application is pending. However, Applicants maintain that neither Schedule 2 nor any other provision of the PJM OATT would allow for the pass through of any transaction-related costs. Neither Applicant has any captive wholesale or retail customers or provides unbundled transmission service. Applicants add that certain of Applicants’ affiliates provide reliability must run, reactive power supply and voltage support, and black start services at cost-based rates, but none of the rate schedules and tariffs pursuant to which they provide such services contains any mechanism that would allow for the pass-through of costs related to the Proposed Transaction. Accordingly, Applicants submit that the Proposed Transaction will not have not have an adverse impact on rates charged to captive wholesale or transmission 20151120-3067 FERC PDF (Unofficial) 11/20/2015 Docket No. EC15-198-000 - 4 - customers. Applicants state that the Proposed Transaction will not have any adverse effect on the effectiveness of federal or state regulation. In particular, the Proposed Transaction will not impair the ability of the Commission to regulate rates for wholesale sales from the Facility or of state regulators to regulate retail sales from that facility. With respect to Cross-Subsidization, Applicants submit that the Proposed Transaction falls within the safe harbor for transactions that do not involve a franchised public utility with captive customers. Furthermore, the Transaction is a bona fide, arm’s- length, bargained-for exchange between non-affiliated entities. Nevertheless, Applicants state that, based on facts and circumstances known to them or that are reasonably foreseeable, the Proposed Transaction will not, at the time of the closing of the Proposed Transaction or in the future, result in: (i) any transfer of facilities between a