DOCSLIB.ORG

On the Development and Applications of Automated Searches For

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
On the Development and Applications of Automated Searches For On the Development and Applications of Automated Searches for Eclipsing Binary Stars A thesis presented by Jonathan Devor to The Department of Astronomy in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the subject of arXiv:0811.0017v1 [astro-ph] 3 Nov 2008 Astronomy Harvard University Cambridge, Massachusetts 13 February 2008 c 2008, by Jonathan Devor All rights reserved. Dissertation Advisor: Prof. David B. Charbonneau Jonathan Devor On the Development and Applications of Automated Searches for Eclipsing Binary Stars Abstract Eclipsing binary star systems provide the most accurate method of measuring both the masses and radii of stars. Moreover, they enable testing tidal synchronization and circularization theories, as well as constraining models of stellar structure and dynamics. With the recent availability of large-scale multi-epoch photometric datasets we were able to study eclipsing binary stars en masse. In this thesis, we analyzed 185,445 light curves from ten TrES fields, and 218,699 light curves from the OGLE II bulge fields. In order to manage such large quantities of data, we developed a pipeline with which we systematically identified eclipsing binaries, solved for their geometric orientations, and then found their components’ absolute properties. Following this analysis we assembled catalogs of eclipsing binaries with their models, computed statistical distributions of their properties, and located rare cases for further follow-up, including T-Cyg1-03378, which has unusual eclipse timing variations. Of particular importance are low-mass eclipsing binaries, which are rare yet critical for resolving the ongoing mass-radius discrepancy between theoretical models and observations. To this end, we have discovered over a dozen new low-mass eclipsing binary candidates and spectroscopically confirmed the masses of five of them. One of these confirmed candidates, T-Lyr1-17236, is especially interesting because of its long orbital period. We examined T-Lyr1-17236 in detail and found that it is consistent with the magnetic disruption hypothesis. Both the source code of our pipeline and the complete list of our candidates are freely available. iii Contents Abstract..................................... iii Acknowledgments................................ ix 1 Introduction 1 1.1 A Brief Historical Overview of Eclipsing Binary Analysis . 4 1.2 APrimeronParameterExtraction . 7 1.3 ASimpleBinaryLightCurveGenerator . 11 1.4 ChapterSummaries............................ 15 2 Solutions for 10,000 Eclipsing Binaries in the Bulge Fields of OGLE II Using DEBiL 19 2.1 Introduction................................ 20 2.2 Motivation................................. 22 2.3 Method .................................. 26 2.3.1 The First Tier – Finding the Period . 27 2.3.2 The Second Tier – DEBiL Fitter . 29 2.3.3 Limitations . 36 2.4 Tests.................................... 38 2.5 Results................................... 39 2.5.1 Population Distributions . 44 2.5.2 ExtremeSystems ......................... 49 iv 2.6 Conclusions ................................ 50 2.7 Appendix-StatisticalTests . 52 2.7.1 FitnessScore ........................... 52 2.7.2 ScatterScore ........................... 53 2.7.3 Waviness.............................. 54 2.8 Appendix-DensityEstimation . 55 3 A Novel Approach to Analyzing Eclipsing Binaries in Large Photo- metric Datasets 63 3.1 Introduction................................ 64 3.2 Express Method for Eclipsing Component Identification (MECI-express) 66 3.3 Method for Eclipsing Component Identification (MECI) . 67 3.4 Conclusions ................................ 70 4 MECI: A Method for Eclipsing Component Identification 73 4.1 Introduction................................ 74 4.2 Motivation................................. 76 4.2.1 Characterizing the Binary Stellar Population . 76 4.2.2 Identifying Low-Mass Main-Sequence EBs . 78 4.2.3 EBsasStandardCandles. 79 4.3 Method .................................. 81 4.3.1 Stage1: FindingtheOrbitalParameters . 81 4.3.2 Stage 2: Finding the Absolute Stellar Parameters . 83 4.3.3 Assessing the Likelihood of a Binary Pairing . 86 4.3.4 Optimization . 88 4.4 TestingMECI............................... 89 4.4.1 ObservedSystems......................... 90 4.4.2 SimulatedSystems ........................ 91 v 4.4.3 Limitations . 100 4.5 Conclusions ................................ 102 5 Identification, Classifications, and Absolute Properties of 773 Eclips- ing Binaries Found in the TrES Survey 103 5.1 Introduction................................ 104 5.2 Method .................................. 107 5.3 Results................................... 132 5.3.1 Low-MassEBs .......................... 157 5.3.2 EccentricEBs........................... 159 5.3.3 AbnormalEBs .......................... 168 5.4 Conclusions ................................ 171 5.5 Appendix - Rejecting Single-Eclipse EB Models . 173 5.6 Appendix - Description of the Catalog Fields . 174 6 T-Lyr1-17236: A Long-Period Low-Mass Eclipsing Binary 179 6.1 Introduction................................ 180 6.2 Initial Photometric Observations . 182 6.3 Follow-up Photometric Observations . 186 6.4 SpectroscopicObservations. 190 6.5 OrbitalAnalysis.............................. 195 6.6 PhysicalParameters ........................... 202 6.7 ChromosphericActivity . .. .. 207 6.8 Comparison with Models and Conclusions . 209 7 Conclusions and Future Work 215 7.1 Low-Mass Candidates with At Least Three RV Measurements . 218 7.1.1 T-CrB0-10759........................... 224 vi 7.1.2 T-Cyg1-12664........................... 228 7.1.3 T-Tau0-04859 ........................... 231 7.1.4 T-Tau0-07388 ........................... 234 7.2 Low-Mass Candidates with Fewer than Three RV Measurements . 237 7.2.1 T-And0-04829........................... 240 7.2.2 T-And0-20382........................... 243 7.2.3 T-CrB0-14232........................... 246 7.2.4 T-Dra0-03021 ........................... 249 7.2.5 T-Dra0-07116 ........................... 252 7.3 T-Cas0-07656: A Pulsating Eclipsing Binary . 256 7.4 T-Cyg1-03378: A Binary with Large O-C Eclipse Timing Variations . 258 References 266 vii “The only way to realize the full scientific benefit of our observations is to share the data with our competition.” –Bohdan Paczy´nski (1940 - 2007) For my Family. Acknowledgments Alfr´ed R´enyi once said, and many others subsequently paraphrased him, that “a mathematician is a device for turning coffee into theorems.” Indeed, in the hard-nosed professional world we live in, be it academic or otherwise, it is easy to forget all the human elements that must fall into place for one to be able to produce original work. In the years leading up to graduate school, I was extraordinarily fortunate to be surrounded by friends, family, and teachers who provided me with continuous support and guidance. My parents, who would patiently answer an unending stream of questions from a very persistent child, would later encourage me to follow my heart’s desire, wherever it might lead me. My decision to spend over a half-decade in school to study Astronomy, was never once questioned. However, as so often the case, my path to Astronomy was by no means a straightforward one. Carl Sagan’s Cosmos provided me with the first major push in this direction, and numerous visits to the San Francisco Exploratorium and the Boston Museum of Science cemented my love for the physical sciences at a young age. However, if it was not for an inspirational high school physics teacher named Reuben Tel-Dan, I would probably never have considered further studying physics in college. After serving in the Israeli military, I enrolled at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem, where I would meet a second inspirational teacher– Avishai Dekel. I first met Professor Dekel at a talk he gave during a freshman survey course. In that lecture I was first introduced to the concepts of dark matter, dark energy, and the concordance model of cosmology. He concluded with the current attempts to simulate the Universe at ix the grandest scales. I was immediately hooked, and proceeded to work in his group until my graduation. It is due to this experience that I chose to go to graduate school, while most of my friends were pursuing jobs at high tech companies. My first encounter with Harvard University resulted in a bit of a culture shock due to its immense range of possibilities, both academically and otherwise. In the following years I would make a point of trying as many activities as I could, sometimes to the dismay of my professors, from rowing in crew and Dragon Boat teams, to building robots that play soccer. When it came time to choose a research topic I had a very difficult time settling on a single project. I was naturally drawn to the search for Exoplanets, which was at that time and probably still is, ranked as the sexiest topic in Astronomy. However, following the sage advice of Bob Noyse and Dimitar Sasselov, I decided to start with something easier and more of a “sure thing”– finding eclipsing binary stars. This topic was intended to be a stepping stone, to get my feet wet, however the more I learned about eclipsing binaries, the more interested I got. The two most attractive aspects of this field were the fact that the necessary observational data were already available from the OGLE team and others, and the fact that even a quick perusal through this data reveals strange and curious variable stars that no one had ever studied before. My first attempts at automatic clustering
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Stsci Newsletter: 1997 Volume 014 Issue 01
    January 1997 • Volume 14, Number 1 SPACE TELESCOPE SCIENCE INSTITUTE Highlights of this issue: • AURA science and functional awards to Leitherer and Hanisch — pages 1 and 23 • Cycle 7 to be extended — page 5 • Cycle 7 approved Newsletter program listing — pages 7-13 Astronomy with HST Climbing the Starburst Distance Ladder C. Leitherer Massive stars are an important and powerful star formation events in sometimes dominant energy source for galaxies. Even the most luminous star- a galaxy. Their high luminosity, both in forming regions in our Galaxy are tiny light and mechanical energy, makes on a cosmic scale. They are not them detectable up to cosmological dominated by the properties of an distances. Stars ~100 times more entire population but by individual massive than the Sun are one million stars. Therefore stochastic effects times more luminous. Except for stars prevail. Extinction represents a severe of transient brightness, like novae and problem when a reliable census of the supernovae, hot, massive stars are Galactic high-mass star-formation the most luminous stellar objects in history is atempted, especially since the universe. massive stars belong to the extreme Massive stars are, however, Population I, with correspondingly extremely rare: The number of stars small vertical scale heights. Moreover, formed per unit mass interval is the proximity of Galactic regions — roughly proportional to the -2.35 although advantageous for detailed power of mass. We expect to find very studies of individual stars — makes it few massive stars compared to, say, difficult to obtain integrated properties, solar-type stars. This is consistent with such as total emission-line fluxes of observations in our solar neighbor- the ionized gas.
    [Show full text]
  • Naming the Extrasolar Planets
    Naming the extrasolar planets W. Lyra Max Planck Institute for Astronomy, K¨onigstuhl 17, 69177, Heidelberg, Germany [email protected] Abstract and OGLE-TR-182 b, which does not help educators convey the message that these planets are quite similar to Jupiter. Extrasolar planets are not named and are referred to only In stark contrast, the sentence“planet Apollo is a gas giant by their assigned scientific designation. The reason given like Jupiter” is heavily - yet invisibly - coated with Coper- by the IAU to not name the planets is that it is consid- nicanism. ered impractical as planets are expected to be common. I One reason given by the IAU for not considering naming advance some reasons as to why this logic is flawed, and sug- the extrasolar planets is that it is a task deemed impractical. gest names for the 403 extrasolar planet candidates known One source is quoted as having said “if planets are found to as of Oct 2009. The names follow a scheme of association occur very frequently in the Universe, a system of individual with the constellation that the host star pertains to, and names for planets might well rapidly be found equally im- therefore are mostly drawn from Roman-Greek mythology. practicable as it is for stars, as planet discoveries progress.” Other mythologies may also be used given that a suitable 1. This leads to a second argument. It is indeed impractical association is established. to name all stars. But some stars are named nonetheless. In fact, all other classes of astronomical bodies are named.
    [Show full text]
  • Magnetism, Dynamo Action and the Solar-Stellar Connection
    Living Rev. Sol. Phys. (2017) 14:4 DOI 10.1007/s41116-017-0007-8 REVIEW ARTICLE Magnetism, dynamo action and the solar-stellar connection Allan Sacha Brun1 · Matthew K. Browning2 Received: 23 August 2016 / Accepted: 28 July 2017 © The Author(s) 2017. This article is an open access publication Abstract The Sun and other stars are magnetic: magnetism pervades their interiors and affects their evolution in a variety of ways. In the Sun, both the fields themselves and their influence on other phenomena can be uncovered in exquisite detail, but these observations sample only a moment in a single star’s life. By turning to observa- tions of other stars, and to theory and simulation, we may infer other aspects of the magnetism—e.g., its dependence on stellar age, mass, or rotation rate—that would be invisible from close study of the Sun alone. Here, we review observations and theory of magnetism in the Sun and other stars, with a partial focus on the “Solar-stellar connec- tion”: i.e., ways in which studies of other stars have influenced our understanding of the Sun and vice versa. We briefly review techniques by which magnetic fields can be measured (or their presence otherwise inferred) in stars, and then highlight some key observational findings uncovered by such measurements, focusing (in many cases) on those that offer particularly direct constraints on theories of how the fields are built and maintained. We turn then to a discussion of how the fields arise in different objects: first, we summarize some essential elements of convection and dynamo theory, includ- ing a very brief discussion of mean-field theory and related concepts.
    [Show full text]
  • GU Monocerotis: a High-Mass Eclipsing Overcontact Binary in the Young Open Cluster Dolidze 25? J
    A&A 590, A45 (2016) Astronomy DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201628224 & c ESO 2016 Astrophysics GU Monocerotis: A high-mass eclipsing overcontact binary in the young open cluster Dolidze 25? J. Lorenzo1, I. Negueruela1, F. Vilardell2, S. Simón-Díaz3; 4, P. Pastor5, and M. Méndez Majuelos6 1 Departamento de Física, Ingeniería de Sistemas y Teoría de la Señal, Escuela Politécnica Superior, Universidad de Alicante, Carretera de San Vicente del Raspeig s/n, 03690 San Vicente del Raspeig, Alicante, Spain e-mail: [email protected] 2 Institut d’Estudis Espacials de Catalunya, Edifici Nexus, c/ Capitá, 2−4, desp. 201, 08034 Barcelona, Spain 3 Instituto de Astrofísica de Canarias, Vía Láctea s/n, 38200 La Laguna, Tenerife, Spain 4 Departamento de Astrofísica, Universidad de La Laguna, Facultad de Física y Matemáticas, Avda. Astrofísico Francisco Sánchez s/n, 38205 La Laguna, Tenerife, Spain 5 Departamento de Lenguajes y Sistemas Informáticos, Universidad de Alicante, Apdo. 99, 03080 Alicante, Spain 6 Departamento de Ciencias, IES Arroyo Hondo, c/ Maestro Manuel Casal 2, 11520 Rota, Cádiz, Spain Received 30 January 2016 / Accepted 3 March 2016 ABSTRACT Context. The eclipsing binary GU Mon is located in the star-forming cluster Dolidze 25, which has the lowest metallicity measured in a Milky Way young cluster. Aims. GU Mon has been identified as a short-period eclipsing binary with two early B-type components. We set out to derive its orbital and stellar parameters. Methods. We present a comprehensive analysis, including B and V light curves and 11 high-resolution spectra, to verify the orbital period and determine parameters.
    [Show full text]
  • Uvsat: a Concept of an Ultraviolet/Optical Photometric Satellite
    UVSat: a concept of an ultraviolet/optical photometric satellite A. Pigulski1, A. Baran2, M. Bzowski3, H. Cugier1, B. Czerny4, J. Daszy´nska-Daszkiewicz1, W. Dziembowski5·6, G. Handler5, Z. Ko laczkowski1, M. Kr´olikowska3, J. Krzesi´nski2, G. Maciejewski7, G. Michalska1, J. Molenda-Zakowicz_ 1, P. Moskalik5, A. Niedzielski7, E. Niemczura1, J. Ostrowski1, A. Pamyatnykh5, M. Ratajczak1, S. Rucinski8, M. Siwak2, R. Smolec5, S. Szutowicz3, T. Tomov7,L. Wyrzykowski6, S. Zo la9 and M. Sarna5 1. Instytut Astronomiczny, Uniwersytet Wroc lawski, Kopernika 11, 51-622 Wroc law, Poland 2. Instytut Fizyki Uniwersytetu Pedagogicznego, Podchora_zych, 2, 30-084 Krak´ow, Poland 3. Centrum Bada´nKosmicznych PAN, Bartycka 18a, 00-716 Warszawa, Poland 4. Centrum Fizyki Teoretycznej PAN, Al. Lotnik´ow 32/46, 02-668 Warszawa, Poland 5. Centrum Astronomiczne im. M. Kopernika PAN, Bartycka 18, 00-716 Warszawa, Poland 6. Obserwatorium Astronomiczne Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego, Al. Ujazdowskie 4, 00-478 Warszawa, Poland 7. Centrum Astronomii, Wydzia lFizyki, Astronomii i Informatyki Stosowanej, Uniwersytet Miko laja Kopernika, Grudziadzka, 5, 87-100 Toru´n, Poland 8. Department of Astronomy & Astrophysics, University of Toronto, 50 St. George Street, Toronto, Canada 9. Obserwatorium Astronomiczne Uniwersytetu Jagiello´nskiego, Orla 171, 30-244 Krak´ow, Poland Time-series photometry from space in the ultraviolet can be presently done with only a few platforms, none of which is able to provide wide-field long-term high- cadence photometry. We present a concept of UVSat, a twin space telescope which will be capable to perform this kind of photometry, filling an observational niche. The satellite will host two telescopes, one for observations in the ultravi- olet, the other for observations in the optical band.
    [Show full text]
  • A New Universe to Discover: a Guide to Careers in Astronomy
    A New Universe to Discover A Guide to Careers in Astronomy Published by The American Astronomical Society What are Astronomy and Astrophysics? Ever since Galileo first turned his new-fangled one-inch “spyglass” on the moon in 1609, the popular image of the astronomer has been someone who peers through a telescope at the night sky. But astronomers virtually never put eye to lens these days. The main source of astronomical data is still photons (particles of light) from space, but the tools used to gather and analyze them are now so sophisticated that it’s no longer necessary (or even possible, in most cases) for a human eye to look through them. But for all the high-tech gadgetry, the 21st-Century astronomer is still trying to answer the same fundamental questions that puzzled Galileo: How does the universe work, and where did it come from? Webster’s dictionary defines “astronomy” as “the science that deals with the material universe beyond the earth’s atmosphere.” This definition is broad enough to include great theoretical physicists like Isaac Newton, Albert Einstein, and Stephen Hawking as well as astronomers like Copernicus, Johanes Kepler, Fred Hoyle, Edwin Hubble, Carl Sagan, Vera Rubin, and Margaret Burbidge. In fact, the words “astronomy” and “astrophysics” are pretty much interchangeable these days. Whatever you call them, astronomers seek the answers to many fascinating and fundamental questions. Among them: *Is there life beyond earth? *How did the sun and the planets form? *How old are the stars? *What exactly are dark matter and dark energy? *How did the Universe begin, and how will it end? Astronomy is a physical (non-biological) science, like physics and chemistry.
    [Show full text]
  • STERNBILD GIRAFFE (Camelopardalis – Cam)
    STERNBILD GIRAFFE (Camelopardalis – Cam) Die GIRAFFE ist ein Sternbild des nördlichen Himmels. Sie kulminiert im Dezember gegen 24h. Es ist ein unauffälliges Sternbild und besteht aus visuell lichtschwachen Sternen, beinhaltet aber interessante Mehrfachsterne und Deep Sky- Objekte. Für ungeübte Beobachter ein Tip: fast alle Sterne, die zwischen dem POLARSTERN und CAPELLA aufzuspüren sind, gehören zur Giraffe. Im Februar und März 2016 zeigt sich der Komet C/2013 US10 CATALINA in diesem Sternbild. Die Giraffe befindet sich innerhalb der Koordinaten RE 14h 26’ bis 03h 15’ und DE +52° bis +86°; Die Nachbarsternbilder sind im Norden KEPHEUS, im Westen KASSIOPEIA, im Süden PERSEUS, FUHRMANN und LUCHS sowie im Osten der GROßE BÄR, DRACHE und KLEINE BÄR Die Giraffe ist nördlich von 37° geogr. Breite zirkumpolar und südl. von –4° nicht mehr vollständig sichtbar. Die Objekte: 1. die Markierungssterne 2. Doppel- und Mehrfachsterne 3. die Veränderlichen 4. der Offene Sternhaufen NGC 1502 5. die Galaxien NGC2403 und IC 342 1. die Markierungssterne Die Sterne im Giraffen gehören wahrlich nicht zu den sichtbar Hellsten, wenn man bedenkt, dass der Stern BETA mit 4 Magnituden an der Spitze steht. Es sind jedoch mitunter wahre Leuchtkraftriesen dabei, die wegen der immensen Distanz nicht heller erscheinen. Das Gerüst des Giraffen wird von den Sternen 7 Cam – Beta – Alpha – Gamma – CS und CE markiert. Gamma (γ) Camelopardalis, RE 03h 50' 21“ / DE +71° 20' mv= 4,59mag; Spektrum= A2IVn; Distanz= 335LJ; LS= 128fach; Mv= -1,0Mag; MS= 3,7fach; RS= 5,5fach; OT= 9250K; EB= 0,042“/Jhr.; RG= -1,0km/s; Doppelstern; mv Komponente B= 12,4mag; Distanz A-B= 56,2“; PW= 240° (1909) Gamma markiert das Hinterteil der Giraffe; Alpha (α) Camelopardalis, 9 Cam; RE 04h 54' 03“ /DE +66°20' mv= 4,26mag; Spektrum= 09,5Ia, Distanz ca.
    [Show full text]
  • Arxiv:0908.2624V1 [Astro-Ph.SR] 18 Aug 2009
    Astronomy & Astrophysics Review manuscript No. (will be inserted by the editor) Accurate masses and radii of normal stars: Modern results and applications G. Torres · J. Andersen · A. Gim´enez Received: date / Accepted: date Abstract This paper presents and discusses a critical compilation of accurate, fun- damental determinations of stellar masses and radii. We have identified 95 detached binary systems containing 190 stars (94 eclipsing systems, and α Centauri) that satisfy our criterion that the mass and radius of both stars be known to ±3% or better. All are non-interacting systems, so the stars should have evolved as if they were single. This sample more than doubles that of the earlier similar review by Andersen (1991), extends the mass range at both ends and, for the first time, includes an extragalactic binary. In every case, we have examined the original data and recomputed the stellar parameters with a consistent set of assumptions and physical constants. To these we add interstellar reddening, effective temperature, metal abundance, rotational velocity and apsidal motion determinations when available, and we compute a number of other physical parameters, notably luminosity and distance. These accurate physical parameters reveal the effects of stellar evolution with un- precedented clarity, and we discuss the use of the data in observational tests of stellar evolution models in some detail. Earlier findings of significant structural differences between moderately fast-rotating, mildly active stars and single stars, ascribed to the presence of strong magnetic and spot activity, are confirmed beyond doubt. We also show how the best data can be used to test prescriptions for the subtle interplay be- tween convection, diffusion, and other non-classical effects in stellar models.
    [Show full text]
  • FY13 High-Level Deliverables
    National Optical Astronomy Observatory Fiscal Year Annual Report for FY 2013 (1 October 2012 – 30 September 2013) Submitted to the National Science Foundation Pursuant to Cooperative Support Agreement No. AST-0950945 13 December 2013 Revised 18 September 2014 Contents NOAO MISSION PROFILE .................................................................................................... 1 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................................ 2 2 NOAO ACCOMPLISHMENTS ....................................................................................... 4 2.1 Achievements ..................................................................................................... 4 2.2 Status of Vision and Goals ................................................................................. 5 2.2.1 Status of FY13 High-Level Deliverables ............................................ 5 2.2.2 FY13 Planned vs. Actual Spending and Revenues .............................. 8 2.3 Challenges and Their Impacts ............................................................................ 9 3 SCIENTIFIC ACTIVITIES AND FINDINGS .............................................................. 11 3.1 Cerro Tololo Inter-American Observatory ....................................................... 11 3.2 Kitt Peak National Observatory ....................................................................... 14 3.3 Gemini Observatory ........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Magnetic Doppler Imaging of 53 Camelopardalis in All Four Stokes Parameters
    A&A 414, 613–632 (2004) Astronomy DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361:20031595 & c ESO 2004 Astrophysics Magnetic Doppler imaging of 53 Camelopardalis in all four Stokes parameters O. Kochukhov1,, S. Bagnulo2,G.A.Wade3, L. Sangalli3, N. Piskunov1,J.D.Landstreet4, P. Petit5, and T. A. A. Sigut4 1 Uppsala Astronomical Observatory, Box 515, 751 20 Uppsala, Sweden 2 European Southern Observatory, Casilla 19001, Santiago 19, Chile 3 Department of Physics, Royal Military College of Canada, Box 17000, Kingston, Ontario, K7K 4B4 Canada 4 Physics and Astronomy Department, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, N6A 3K7 Canada 5 Observatoire Midi-Pyr´en´ees, 14 avenue Edouard´ Belin, 31400 Toulouse, France Received 30 June 2003 / Accepted 10 October 2003 Abstract. We present the first investigation of the structure of the stellar surface magnetic field using line profiles in all four Stokes parameters. We extract the information about the magnetic field geometry and abundance distributions of the chemically peculiar star 53 Cam by modelling time-series of high-resolution spectropolarimetric observations with the help of a new magnetic Doppler imaging code. This combination of the unique four Stokes parameter data and state-of-the-art magnetic imaging technique makes it possible to infer the stellar magnetic field topology directly from the rotational variability of the Stokes spectra. In the magnetic imaging of 53 Cam we discard the traditional multipolar assumptions about the structure of magnetic fields in Ap stars and explore the stellar magnetic topology without introducing any global a priori constraints on the field structure. The complex magnetic model of 53 Cam derived with our magnetic Doppler imaging method achieves a good fit to the observed intensity, circular and linear polarization profiles of strong magnetically sensitive Fe spectral lines.
    [Show full text]
  • GEORGE HERBIG and Early Stellar Evolution
    GEORGE HERBIG and Early Stellar Evolution Bo Reipurth Institute for Astronomy Special Publications No. 1 George Herbig in 1960 —————————————————————– GEORGE HERBIG and Early Stellar Evolution —————————————————————– Bo Reipurth Institute for Astronomy University of Hawaii at Manoa 640 North Aohoku Place Hilo, HI 96720 USA . Dedicated to Hannelore Herbig c 2016 by Bo Reipurth Version 1.0 – April 19, 2016 Cover Image: The HH 24 complex in the Lynds 1630 cloud in Orion was discov- ered by Herbig and Kuhi in 1963. This near-infrared HST image shows several collimated Herbig-Haro jets emanating from an embedded multiple system of T Tauri stars. Courtesy Space Telescope Science Institute. This book can be referenced as follows: Reipurth, B. 2016, http://ifa.hawaii.edu/SP1 i FOREWORD I first learned about George Herbig’s work when I was a teenager. I grew up in Denmark in the 1950s, a time when Europe was healing the wounds after the ravages of the Second World War. Already at the age of 7 I had fallen in love with astronomy, but information was very hard to come by in those days, so I scraped together what I could, mainly relying on the local library. At some point I was introduced to the magazine Sky and Telescope, and soon invested my pocket money in a subscription. Every month I would sit at our dining room table with a dictionary and work my way through the latest issue. In one issue I read about Herbig-Haro objects, and I was completely mesmerized that these objects could be signposts of the formation of stars, and I dreamt about some day being able to contribute to this field of study.
    [Show full text]
  • Biography of Horace Welcome Babcock
    NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES H O R ACE W ELCOME B A B COC K 1 9 1 2 — 2 0 0 3 A Biographical Memoir by GEO R G E W . P R ESTON Any opinions expressed in this memoir are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Academy of Sciences. Biographical Memoir COPYRIGHT 2007 NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES WASHINGTON, D.C. Photograph by Mount Wilson and Los Campanas Observatories HORACE WELCOME BABCOCK September 13, 1912−August 29, 2003 BY GEORGE W . P RESTON ORACE BABCOCK’S CAREER at the Mount Wilson and Palomar H(later, Hale) Observatories spanned more than three decades. During the first 18 years, from 1946 to 1964, he pioneered the measurement of magnetic fields in stars more massive than the sun, produced a famously successful model of the 22-year cycle of solar activity, and invented important instruments and techniques that are employed throughout the world to this day. Upon assuming the directorship of the observatories, he devoted his last 14 years to creating one of the world’s premier astronomical observatories at Las Campanas in the foothills of the Chilean Andes. CHILDHOOD AND EDUCATION Horace Babcock was born in Pasadena, California, the only child of Harold and Mary Babcock. Harold met Horace’s mother, Mary Henderson, in Berkeley during his student days at the College of Electrical Engineering, University of California. After brief appointments as a laboratory assis- tant at the National Bureau of Standards in 1906 and as a physics teacher at the University of California, Berkeley, in 1907, Horace’s father was invited by George Ellery Hale in 1908 to join the staff of the Mount Wilson Observatory (MWO), where he remained for the rest of his career.
    [Show full text]