DOCSLIB.ORG

HUMBER PROJECTS MONITORING SHEET Last Update: 08/08/18

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
HUMBER PROJECTS MONITORING SHEET Last Update: 08/08/18 HUMBER PROJECT MONITORING SHEET Paper B HUMBER PROJECTS MONITORING SHEET Last update: 08/08/18 Notes for completion Project number LGF project EZ site refs Project title and brief Named project owner / Project progress and description Last updated main delivery milestones Create a project number To identify if the project Insert site number(s) of Consistent project title in State the name and Note progress to date. Hxx in sequence. This or component(s) of it are related EZ sites. bold. organisation of the Note future milestones. number will act as a funded via LGF funds. Humber LEP to circulate Brief project description person who is unique reference across H – Humber LEP these site references in new paragraph below. responsible for this all LEP activity. record, and can be NY – York, North shortly. contacted for more Yorkshire & East Riding information. LEP Enter the month and year GL – Greater the record was last Lincolnshire LEP updated. TOTAL PROJECT IMPACTS SINGLE CONVERSATION MATTERS Action progress notes Capital value (£M) Jobs Homes Project Stage Need for action Action Rank Current delivery barriers /Matters needing statutory agency action / intervention Insert total capital Identify the direct Identify the direct 4 – Detailed Planning 3 – Immediate action Project Stage x Identify those issues which are Note important updates since the entry was value of the jobs potential homes potential Stage (Has planning/ or intervention required. Need for action= currently, or anticipated to be last updated and important progress / project. This (including enabled) (including enabled) funding status) 2 – Actively monitor for 12-8 High Priority barriers to timely and cost- continued issues. Highlight other issues not provides an of the end of the end effective delivery. suitable for other columns. 3 – Pipeline Project action and delays. 7-4 Medium indication of scale, scheme, as used scheme, as used 2 - In delivery 1 – No (further) Priority Clearly identify the actions or potential economic in any appraisal. in any appraisal. attention required – for interventions required from impact, particularly Note if indirect. Note if indirect. 1 - Completed 3-1 Low Priority information only. statutory agencies in order for for privately funded the project to progress. projects. Project title and brief Named Project progress and TOTAL PROJECT SINGLE CONVERSATION MATTERS Action progress notes description project main delivery IMPACTS owner / milestones Capital Jobs Homes Project Need Action Current delivery Last updated value Stage for Rank barriers / Matters (£M) SCG needing statutory action agency action / intervention LGF project? refs site EZ Project no. Project Action Rank = Project Stage x Need for action= 12-8 High Priority (Red) 7-4 Medium Priority (Amber) 3-1 Low Priority (Green) HUMBER PROJECT MONITORING SHEET Paper B Project title and brief Named Project progress and TOTAL PROJECT SINGLE CONVERSATION MATTERS Action progress notes description project main delivery IMPACTS owner / milestones Capital Jobs Homes Project Need Action Current delivery Last updated value Stage for Rank barriers / Matters (£M) SCG needing statutory action agency action / intervention LGF project? refs site EZ Project no. Project H01 Y - A63 Castle Street Ross Public exhibition £392.5 tbc x Detailed 3 12 Main scheme Highways England is continuing to develop the main A63 Castle Street scheme and is finalising a Improvement Scheme Bellingha spring 2017 m Planning DCO not approved m, Hull which 4 the Environmental Statement and DCO Major Highways England DCO submission – ---------------------------------- documents. scheme to remodel A63 at City September 2018. include Castle Street in Hull city Council s Highways England DCO Approval/SoS centre. advanc responsible for scheme Following meetings with HE Directors, HCC and Decision – February e delivery with support Emma Hardy MP we are now delivering PQ Footbridge forms part of A63 2020. delivery from HCC. bridge in advance of the main scheme subject to Castle Street Improvement Start main scheme of PQ acquiring the land by agreement. Scheme – links Waterfront construction March bridge. Garrison Road Improvement scheme is being area to City Centre Highways England 2020 with completion funded separately by OD and is due to be on site (pedestrian / cycle bridge) engagement with in 18/19. by March 2025. stakeholders continues. Regular monthly meetings with HCC ongoing to There are still a number address technical issues that need resolving prior of technical issues to to DCO submission. resolve with HCC such as traffic management Highways England keen to agree Statements of proposals and site Common Ground with all affected landowners / compound locations. stakeholders. These discussions have Monthly progress commenced and will be continued right up to meetings with HCC to submission of the DCO. address these o/s issues. Historic England understands there is a need to take down a portion of the Earl de Grey as the scheme cannot be built safely with the building where it is. An assessment of the building’s condition has now taken place to identify viable options to relocate the building. HE is working with Historic England to agree a proposal that is acceptable for the DCO application and meetings are ongoing. The Faculty for removal and re-burial of the bodies in TBG and for landscaping following the work have both been out for consultation and are now with the Chancellor for sign off. An objection to faculty for removal of bodies has been received and a written objection is being considered at the moment. HE are aware that Historic England are still unhappy about the number of bodies we are proposing are made available for analysis. Our proposals are in line with the wishes of Holy Trinity Church. It is now proposed to dismantle and rebuild or jack and move the Grade II listed Earl de Grey. At Action Rank = Project Stage x Need for action= 12-8 High Priority (Red) 7-4 Medium Priority (Amber) 3-1 Low Priority (Green) present, Historic England is not satisfied with the assessment of significance and impact. We are also still waiting for a report on the justification for the need in principle for the works. We have consistently advised that this work should be undertaken in advance of the Submission of the LDO. HUMBER PROJECT MONITORING SHEET Paper B Project title and brief Named Project progress and TOTAL PROJECT SINGLE CONVERSATION MATTERS Action progress notes description project main delivery IMPACTS owner / milestones Capital Jobs Homes Project Need Action Current delivery Last updated value Stage for Rank barriers / Matters (£M) SCG needing statutory action agency action / intervention LGF project? refs site EZ Project no. Project HO1 A63 Castle Street Ross Start construction of Detailed 3 12 Early delivery of PQ Tenders for a Principal Contractor have been b Footbridge Bellingha PQ bridge by Oct Planning bridge received and assessed. A ‘validation’ m, Hull 2018 in advance of 4 Land required not exercise will now be undertaken, with City main scheme, subject contract award expected in mid-August. Footbridge forms part of A63 secured by Council to acquiring the land Castle Street Improvement agreement. by agreement, with Scheme – links Waterfront ------------------------------- Land by agreement is progressing well. The completion by March area to City Centre project team believe there are no barriers to 2020. (pedestrian / cycle bridge signing the agreements. Final agreements are being drafted, with singing expected in early August (before contract award). H03 - x Paull / Hedon Haven ABP Site allocated for port Detailed 3 12 This area was covered Constructive meetings a have been held with the Strategic 205ha employment related uses in the Planning by a simplified planning Humber LEP and ERYC around the timescales for site, of which 80ha forms adopted East Riding 4 regime established by the final business case submission and the part of the Humber Green Local Plan an adopted LDO (now process for contracting the award once approved. Port Enterprise Zone. This expired). As a result we are now targeting an earlier site offers the north bank of submission date of the Final LGF business case the Humber area the Updates have been Habitat mitigation work and cost plan at beginning of Q3 2018 versus the greatest opportunity to attract requested, awaiting has been completed in end of Q3 2018 land hungry tier one/two information will report line with the planning supply chain companies for orally at the meeting. conditions within the ABP have budgeted the necessary match funding the offshore wind industry as LDO in 2019 but accessing these funds will need full well as port-related Abnormal infrastructure ABP Board approvals prior to submission of Final renewable and low carbon LDO expired 13 June costs are inhibiting site LGF Full Business case industries. 2018. preparation. Options to The Humber Growth Deal address this are has allocated £3m of funding continually being to improve flood defences looked at. around the site. DCLG EZ Programme team are aware of infrastructure issues. Application for new LDO submitted 8 June 2018. To date, concerns raised by Historic England and Highways England (issued a non- determination for 6 months) Action Rank = Project Stage x Need for action= 12-8 High Priority (Red) 7-4 Medium Priority (Amber) 3-1 Low Priority (Green) HUMBER PROJECT MONITORING SHEET Paper B Project title and brief Named Project progress and TOTAL PROJECT SINGLE CONVERSATION MATTERS Action progress notes description project main delivery IMPACTS owner / milestones Capital Jobs Homes Project Need Action Current delivery Last updated value Stage for Rank barriers / Matters (£M) SCG needing statutory action agency action / intervention LGF project? refs site EZ Project no. Project H04 x South Humber Bank Lesley Update 19.04.16 - Up to Will Detailed 3 12 East Coast review has Next steps is to discharge requirements in (a) Enterprise Zone Potts The infrastructure £450 4,000 accel Planning had impact on the the DCO – m NLC including the AME erate 4 AMEP speed of highways network is AME P devel development AMEP: EA/NE/MMO – ongoing technical in design.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • East Riding Yorkshire. Kirby Underdale. 453
    DIRECTORY.] EAST RIDING YORKSHIRE. KIRBY UNDERDALE. 453 ia 1871: there are 250 sittings. The register dates from the from Hull, at 9.15 a. m.; dispatched at 4.40 p,m, Middle• ylll\r1563. The living is a. vicarage annexed to that of Lund, ton-on-the-Wolds is the nearest money order office & tithe rent-charge £xg, joint net yearly value £270, including Driffield the nearest telegraph office ~II &eres of glebe and residence, in the gift of the Rev. Alex- National School (mixed), for 6o children; average attend- ander Grimston M.A.. vicar of Stillingfleet, and held since 1890 ance, 24; Mrs. Carolina Ford, mistress by the Rev. Charles Smith Sundius M. A. of Trinity College, Wilfholme, 2 .1. miles east, is a place in this township. Oxford, who resides at Lund. Here is a small Primitive ~ :Methodist chapel, formerly used as a school room. Kiln wick Bracken is a hamlet and township in the parish of and Hall, the property of the Hon. Lady Du Cane, and now the x mile west from Kiln wick and 61 south-west from Driffield, residence of Albert Carter Spence esq. is a mansion in the in the union and county court d1strict of Driffield. The Elaabethan style, and stanlls in a well-wooded park of about tithe goes to the perpetual curate of Kiln wick. Lady Du 40 acres. The Hon Lady Du Cane, of Queen's Gate gardens, Cane is lady of the manor and principal landowner. l1; London s w, is lady of the manor and chief landowner.
    [Show full text]
  • Section 58 Restrictions Current Or Proposed - 01/10/2019
    Section 58 restrictions current or proposed - 01/10/2019 Town Name Street Name Street Code Location Status Start Date Period ADLINGFLEET KINGS CAUSEWAY 45908283 From 200m NW of New Brakes Farm, to 64m from southern In Force 06/03/2017 5 Years extension of Park Farm Access Road ALDBROUGH HORNSEA ROAD 45901491 Just north of tight 'S' bend to junction with Queensmead In Force 17/08/2016 5 Years BAINTON MAIN STREET 45901849 Full Length In Force 17/10/2018 5 Years BAINTON MIDDLETON ROAD 45902026 Junction with Main Street/Station Road for approx. 50m In Force 17/10/2018 5 Years BAINTON TIBTHORPE ROAD 45904925 Full Length In Force 17/10/2018 5 Years BALKHOLME MAIN ROAD 45901843 Full Length In Force 11/09/2017 5 Years BARMBY MOOR HODSOW LANE 45901463 Junction with West Green to road split SW of Little Grange Farm In Force 31/08/2018 5 Years BEEFORD BEVERLEY ROAD 45900291 Approx. 25m south of No.1 to junction with Main Street/Skipssea Planned 12/08/2019 3 Years Road (B1249) BEEFORD MAIN STREET 45901850 Full Length Planned 23/09/2019 3 Years BESWICK WILFHOLME ROAD 45903465 Junction with Wilfholme Carrs to Wilfholme Bridge In Force 05/04/2019 5 Years BEVERLEY BECKSIDE 45900229 Junction with Holme Church Lane (Potter Hill) to No.21 In Force 15/05/2018 5 Years BEVERLEY GROVEHILL ROAD 45903890 Grovehill Road Roundabout to Zarya Court In Force 25/01/2019 5 Years BEVERLEY LAIRGATE 45912837 From No.77 to Memorial Hall In Force 04/07/2018 5 Years BEVERLEY LORD ROBERTS ROAD 45904652 Full Length In Force 13/06/2018 5 Years BEVERLEY MORTON LANE 45902127 Junction
    [Show full text]
  • River Hull Integrated Catchment Strategy Strategy Document
    River Hull Advisory Board River Hull Integrated Catchment Strategy April 2015 Strategy Document Draft report This Page is intentionally left blank 2 Inner Leaf TITLE PAGE 3 This page is intentionally left blank 4 Contents 1 This Document.............................................................................................................................17 2 Executive Summary ..............................................................................................................18 3 Introduction and background to the strategy ..................................20 3.1 Project Summary .................................................................................................................................... 20 3.2 Strategy Vision ........................................................................................................................................ 20 3.2.1 Links to other policies and strategies .......................................................................................21 3.3 Background .............................................................................................................................................. 22 3.3.1 Location ........................................................................................................................................... 22 3.3.2 Key characteristics and issues of the River Hull catchment ...............................................22 3.3.3 EA Draft River Hull Flood Risk Management Strategy .........................................................26
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix A: Background Cultural Heritage Context
    Appendix A: Background Cultural Heritage Context Archaeological Sites The East Riding, and the c.980sqkm selected for the SEA Addendum study area, has been shaped by man’s activities over the past 10,000 years. As a result, the area contains a rich heritage of archaeological sites (both designated and non-designated), dating from the early prehistoric periods to the 20th century, which reflect the region’s varied social and economic history. The Prehistoric Periods (up to c.700 BC) The earliest phases of prehistoric occupation are generally characterised by an increasing exploitation of the natural landscape and its resources. Artefactual evidence suggests that there was a human presence in Holderness during the Palaeolithic period, and several sites have been identified within the River Hull corridor; one flint-working site at Brigham was excavated in 1962-63 in advance of gravel extraction. Climatic improvements after the Devensian ice age led to the re- establishment of forests, and plants and animals became available for exploitation. While Holderness saw some transient human activity in the later Mesolithic period (c.8300-4000 BC), there was also a significant population on the Wolds, centred on ‘activity areas’ associated with ponds and springs. The number and density of sites on the Wolds implies that this higher land was well-populated during the subsequent Neolithic period (c.4000-2500 BC). Although initially a pastoral society, the gradual introduction of grain crops resulted in a more widespread mixed agricultural regime. The construction of large communal burial mounds as well as other sacred or ritual sites, such as henges, cursus and mortuary enclosures, suggests that there was an organised, community-based society.
    [Show full text]
  • Spring 2021 – Newsletter
    Keeping you informed April 2021 River Hull Bathymetric The survey covers the 32.3km (20 miles) of the River Hull (from the Survey confluence of West Beck and Frodingham Beck to the mouth of the Background River Hull into the Humber estuary – Figure 1). The Environment Agency (EA) has a regular maintenance programme The survey used a combination of light across East Yorkshire which ensures detection and ranging (LiDAR) and the operation of flood risk assets and multibeam bathymetry methods to facilitates the conveyance of water derive a 0.5m resolution dataset which along the Main River network. Since covers as much of the river bed as 2018, as part of this programme, we was practically possible during the have significantly increased the survey period. desilting maintenance, desilting Burstwick New Clough in 2019 and Lords Clough in 2020. The EA reviews the controls of conveyance along the River Hull and the impact this has on river levels across the catchment. As part of this review a bathymetric (channel bed) survey was commissioned during 2019 – 2020 which allows us: (1) to identify if any location(s) are restricting conveyance along the watercourse and (2) to undertake longer-term planning for the management of the catchment. This briefing note intends to provide you with the context for the survey and an overview of its outputs. Survey Approach The bathymetric survey was carried out between November 2020 and January 2021. Figure 1: River Hull survey length (blue line). www.gov.uk/environment-agency Outputs significant owing to the major logistical Seven sheets display the survey data operations required to access through as well as a long section of the river.
    [Show full text]
  • Landscape and Visual Assessment
    Hornsea Project Four: Preliminary Environmental Information Report (PEIR) Volume 3, Chapter 4: Landscape and Visual Assessment Prepared Land Use Consultants, 27 July 2019 Checked Royal HaskoningDHV 28 July 2019 Accepted Ant Sahota, Ørsted, 30 July 2019 Approved Julian Carolan, Ørsted, 30 July 2019 Doc. No.: A3.4 Version: A Table of Contents 4.1 Introduction ............................................................................................................. 6 4.2 Purpose ..................................................................................................................... 6 4.3 Planning and Policy Context ............................................................................... 7 4.4 Consultation .......................................................................................................... 11 4.5 Hornsea Four Landscape and Visual study area .......................................... 14 4.6 Methodology to inform baseline ...................................................................... 18 4.7 Baseline environment ......................................................................................... 20 4.8 Project basis for assessment ............................................................................. 39 4.9 Maximum Design Scenario ................................................................................. 46 4.10 Assessment methodology ................................................................................. 51 4.11 Impact assessment .............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • TRADES. [NORTH .AND EAST RIDINGS F.&IOIEP.S Continued
    'i86 FAR TRADES. [NORTH .AND EAST RIDINGS F.&IOIEP.S continued. Duck William, Sleighh Dunwell Thomas, :Booth Ferry, l:ned-1 Donaldson Mrs. Ann Elizabeth, East Ducker James, Burstwick, Hull lington, Ho-wden Angrove, Great Ayton Duckles Thomas, Haxby, York Durham Harry, Raw, FylingdaleB, Donaldson John Henry, Great Ayton Dudding Mrs. Mary, Newport Robin Hood's Bay Donaldson Joseph, Tunstall, Catterick Duell Mrs. Annie, Dale ho. Staithes Dntton Edward, Alne, York Donaldson William,Constable Burton Duell Ralph Welford, Rock head, Dutton Joseph, Sheriff Button, York Donkin Henry George, The Grange, Lythe, Whitby Dutton Thomas, Strensall, York Wyton, Hull Duell Robt. C. East Barnby, Whitby Dyas Neville, Kirby Fleetham,Bedale Donkin James, Holme road, Market Duell William, Ugthorpe, Grosmont Dykes Chas. West Huntington, York Weighton Duesbury Arthur, Levisham, Pickerng Dyson Edwin, Patrington, Hull Donkin Jam~s, No-rth Cave Duffield Mrs. Elizabeth & Son, Skew- Eales John, Thornhill, Stearsby, Dookes Thomas, Spring house, Farn- green, Wildon Grange, Thirsk Brandsby, Easingwold dale West Side, Kirby Moorside Duffin Christopher, Asselby, Howden Earle John William, Kirkbridge, Dorsey Amos, Shipton-Thorpe,Marke1 Duffitt John, :Belmire, Whitwell-on- Stanwick St. John, Darlington Weighton the-Hill, York Earle R. Manor ho. Ellerton,Darlngtn Dosser James, Tithe fa.rm, Wansford, Duffus Mrs. Mary &; Son, Bowes hill, Earle 'fhoma.s B. The Hall, .A.ld- Driffield Danby-Wiske, Northallerton brough, Darlington Dougill John, Gunnerside, Richmond Duggelby J. The Grange, Bempton, Easbv J.East Bank, Bilsdale,Stokeslev Douglas Aaron, Barmby-on-tbe- BI"idlington Easby Mrs. Jane, Bilsdale West Side, Marsh, Howden Duggleby Arth. Sheriff Hutton, York Helmsley Douglas Edwa.rd, Easington, Hull Duggleby Charles Henry, Horn Hill Easby John Robert, :Mansfield house.
    [Show full text]
  • Libraries and Multi Service Centres Consultation
    Libraries and Multi Service Centres Consultation 7,780 people told us what is We’ve listened and have a proposal important to them about the for the future of the library service library service and multi service centres Have your say on our proposal, take part in the public consultation from 25 May to 3 August 2016 www.eastriding.gov.uk/proposalconsultation The library service and multi service centres consultation Local Government has experienced significant reductions in funding. Since 2010, East Riding of Yorkshire Council has made savings of £118 million and needs to find a further £60 million over the next four years. The council is proud of its record on libraries and customer services and is committed to providing excellent services in the future. Our proposal takes full account of what you told us in the consultation exercise we undertook from 29 September to 21 December 2015. The proposal ensures that there will continue to be excellent and comprehensive library service and multi service centre provision across the East Riding of Yorkshire whilst contributing to the savings that the council needs to make. In the consultation we asked: ‘Our Proposal’ ‘If savings were to be made to the library budget and you had to choose, should the council save Our proposal would: money by...’ Closing some branch libraries but keeping 1. Retain a library or multi service centre in opening hours the same at the remaining each major town or village in the East Riding branch libraries but reduce opening hours Or 2. Retain a mobile library service which would Keeping all current branch libraries open but continue to deliver services across the East reducing their opening hours Riding but reduce the level of service 87% chose to ‘keep all current branch libraries open but reduce their opening hours.’ 3.
    [Show full text]
  • "Providing Long Term Sustainable Management of Flood Risk"
    River Hull Advisory Board River Hull Integrated Catchment Strategy May 2016 Strategy Document Final report "Providing long term sustainable management of flood risk" This document was issued and approved as follows: Version Control Version Originator Checked Date Comment 1 BK AM 10/07/2015 2 CB AM 30/03/2016 3 BK AM 31/05/2016 Partner Approvals Record Organisation Approver Date of Approval East Riding of Yorkshire Council Cabinet 7 July 2015 Hull City Council Cabinet 22 June 2015 Area Flood and Coastal Environment Agency 3 July 2015 Risk Manager Beverley & North Holderness Board 8 July 2015 Internal Drainage Board Yorkshire Water Flood Risk Manager 9 July 2015 River Hull Advisory Board Board 10 July 2015 Through the above approval the partners are recognising the work that has been carried out to produce the River Hull Integrated Catchment Strategy which sets out a holistic and strategic approach to managing the flood risk for the River Hull catchment. The partners have agreed to have regard to this Strategy in formulating their future proposals for managing flood risk within the catchment. The progression of individual projects or interventions identified within this Strategy will be subject to the normal assurance and approval processes of the individual body concerned and those of any relevant funding body. i RIVER HULL ADVISORY BOARD RIVER HULL INTEGRATED CATCHMENT STRATEGY MAY 2016 ©2016. East Riding of Yorkshire Council. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced in any form or by any means without the prior permission of East Riding of Yorkshire Council ii Contact information For further information about this Strategy, please contact us using the details below.
    [Show full text]
  • Infrastructure Delivery Plan
    East Riding of Yorkshire Council Infrastructure Delivery Plan March 2015 Infrastructure Delivery Plan East Riding Infrastructure Delivery Plan 1.1 This Infrastructure Delivery Plan (IDP) sets out what infrastructure is likely to be needed to support the amount and distribution of housing and economic development set out within the East Riding Local Plan. It draws on information from the East Riding Infrastructure Study and identifies the main partners that will have a role in helping to deliver the Local Plan. The Community Infrastructure Levy (CIL) is likely to be an important way of funding infrastructure, where existing funding sources are insufficient. The delivery timescales set out in the IDP are indicative and based on development occurring at a linear rate each year. However, the baseline (existing) capacity of infrastructure can also change over time, which may result in changes to timescales over which new investment would be required 1.2 The infrastructure set out within the IDP has been broken down to highlight those elements considered to be essential in delivering the scale and location of development promoted within the Local Plan. Essential infrastructure is that which definitely needs to be provided prior to particular developments taking place. Whilst a need exists for other infrastructure, and has been set out within the Delivery Plan, it may still be possible for development to go ahead prior to this infrastructure being in place. East Riding of Yorkshire Council 1 Infrastructure Deli Infrastructure Infrastructure Delivery
    [Show full text]
  • Humber Eel Management Issues: Barriers and Stocking
    UNIVERSITY OF Hull International Fisheries Institute HIFI Humber eel management issues: barriers and stocking FINAL REPORT A. D. Nunn, J. P. Harvey, R. A. A. Noble & I. G. Cowx April 2007 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page No. LIST OF TABLES iv LIST OF FIGURES iv LIST OF PLATES v ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS viii 1. INTRODUCTION 1 2. OBJECTIVES 1 2.1 Specific objectives 2 3. PROJECT STRATEGY 2 3.1 Identification of eel migration barriers 2 3.1.1 Collection and collation of fisheries data 2 3.1.2 Prioritisation of eel migration barriers 2 3.2 Elver stocking 3 4. DEVELOPMENT OF PRIORITISATION MATRICES 3 4.1 Eel migration barrier prioritisation matrix 3 4.2 Elver stocking prioritisation matrix 6 5. PRIORITISATION OF EEL MIGRATION BARRIERS 7 5.1 River Hull 7 5.2 Yorkshire Ouse 11 5.3 Yorkshire Derwent 11 5.4 River Ure 13 5.5 River Swale 14 5.6 River Nidd 15 5.7 River Wharfe 16 5.8 River Trent 17 5.9 River Don 19 5.10 River Rother 20 5.11 River Dearne 21 5.12 River Aire 22 5.13 River Calder 23 5.14 River Ancholme 24 5.15 River Foulness/Market Weighton Canal 25 5.16 Swinefleet Warping Drain 26 5.17 Tetney Haven 26 5.18 Adlingfleet Drain 27 5.19 Pauper’s Drain 27 5.20 Bosky Dyke (Keadby Warping Drain) 28 6. PRIORITISATION OF ELVER STOCKING AREAS 28 6.1 Yorkshire Ouse 28 6.2 Yorkshire Derwent 36 6.3 River Ure 39 6.4 River Trent 39 6.5 River Don 46 6.6 River Rother 49 6.7 River Dearne 51 6.8 River Aire 54 6.9 River Calder 57 6.10 River Ancholme 60 ii 6.11 Swinefleet Warping Drain 60 6.12 Tetney Haven 62 6.13 Adlingfleet Drain 62 6.14 Pauper’s Drain 62 6.15 Bosky Dyke (Keadby Warping Drain) 64 7.
    [Show full text]
  • Hull Times Index 1928-45
    Index Air Force ............................................................................................................................................................................. 3 Agriculture.......................................................................................................................................................................... 4 Antiquities ......................................................................................................................................................................... 11 Army ................................................................................................................................................................................. 14 Art ..................................................................................................................................................................................... 15 Associations ...................................................................................................................................................................... 18 Banks & Finance .............................................................................................................................................................. 22 Books ................................................................................................................................................................................. 23 Bridges .............................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]