NATIONAL MONUMENT Georgia Developed Preliminary Plans for the Cockspur Siege and Surrender of Fort Pulaski H

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

NATIONAL MONUMENT Georgia Developed Preliminary Plans for the Cockspur Siege and Surrender of Fort Pulaski H NATIONAL MONUMENT Georgia developed preliminary plans for the Cockspur Siege and Surrender of Fort Pulaski H. Olmstead: "Colonel, they will make it very FORT PULASKI fort in 182", and work was begun 2 years later warm for you with shells from that point but under the direction of Maj. Samuel Babcock. DURING the tumultuous days that immediately they cannot breach at that distance." About 800 Robert E. Lee's first appointment after his preceded the outbreak of the Civil War, Fort yards was then universally accepted in military National Monument graduation from West Point, in 1829, was to Pulaski had not been garrisoned by the United circles as the distance from which a brick forti­ Cockspur Island, where he assisted with the States. To prevent Federal troops from occu­ fication could be breached with ordinary early work on the fort until 1831. Early in 1831, pying it. Governor Brown, of Georgia, ordered cannon. This belief was soon to be shattered A fine example of an early 19th-century fort and the scene of an Lt. J. K. F. Mansfield replaced Major Babcock it seized on January 3, 1861. Georgia seceded when the real test of Fort Pulaski's strength important bombardment daring the Civil War. in command at Cockspur Island. Under Mans­ from the Union on January 19, and on March came early in 1862. field's supervision, Bernard's plans for the fort 20 the fort was transferred to the Government While cannon and munitions were being were revised, and the structure was built largely of the Confederacy. brought by the Confederates to Cockspur Island ORT PULASKI National Monument of Savannah and enforce customs and quarantine during the 14 years of his administration. In Soon the Confederates undertook to prepare in the fall of 1861. a large Federal military and commemorates the end ol a distinct laws. This early fortification, partially destroyed 1833, the new fort was named Pulaski in honor Fort Pulaski for the inevitable battle which was naval force was moving southward by sea, chapter in the ever-changing develop­ by storms, was dismantled in 1776 by the F of Count Casimir Pulaski. to be waged for its possession. Located about a capturing and blockading ports along the The Arches. Photo by O. Gregg Wilson. ment of military science. Its massive walls, in Americans upon the approach of the British Construction continued at Fort Pulaski more mile from the nearest high land on Tybee Atlantic coast as it came. From a base on Hilton which approximately 26,000,000 bricks were fleet. After the Revolution, new defenses were or less continuously from 1829 to 1847. It was Island, it was then believed that the fort could Head Island, S. C, about 16 miles from Cock­ placed by patient masons over a period of nearly needed for the Savannah River, and the United The siege of Fort Pulaski, moreover, was a an enormous project. Lumber, lime, lead, iron, never be taken. One high military authority spur, the Federal attack on Fort Pulaski was 20 years, still bear the historic scars of a 30-hour States, in 1794-96, erected Fort Greene, named landmark in military history. The breaching of and other building supplies were bought both even said: "You might as well cannonade the planned. bombardment by Federal artillerymen on April in honor of the Revolutionary hero, Gen. the fort's massive brick walls by projectiles from in the North and South in large quantities Rocky Mountains as Fort Pulaski." Early in Federal batteries of the new rifled cannon, to­ 10-11. 1862. The bombardment demonstrated Nathanael Greene. Unfortunately, the life of rifled cannon demonstrated for the first time- for the project. Nearly a million dollars was November 1861, Gen. Robert E. Lee, then in gether with regular cannon, were set up on to the world for tire first time the tremendous this fort was brief and tragic, for the great that the old type of brick and masonry fortifica­ spent on Fort Pulaski, but in one respect it was command of the Confederate defenses on the Tybee Island, opposite the fort, early in 1862. battering power of the new rifled cannon. Sur­ equinoctial gale of 1804 completely demolished tions could not withstand the fire of modern never finished. Its armament was to include southeastern coast, arrived at Fort Pulaski tor a Early on the morning of April 10, when the render of the "impregnable" fortress by the its battery and barracks. A quarter of a century guns. about 140 cannon, but at the beginning of the brief inspection of its preparations for defense. Federal fortes were all in readiness, the Union Confederates, who had seized it at the outbreak elapsed before Cockspur Island was again se­ In 1880, Fort Pulaski was abandoned as an Civil War only 20 cannon had been mounted, It is related that at that time, while referring to commander, Maj. Gen. David Hunter, sent a of the Civil War, gave notice to military engi­ lected as the site of a fortification to command active post, and while temporary defense meas­ and even these were not in a serviceable possible Federal batteries on Tybee Island, he communication to Colonel Olmstead demand­ neers that the day of brick citadels had passed the South Atlantic coast and the Savannah ures were taken within the structure and on the condition. observed to the fort's commandant, Col. Charles ing the unconditional surrender of Fort Pulaski. forever. Today, the structure is not only a River valley. island during the Spanish-American War no memorial to the fortitude of its defenders, but To this Colonel Olmstead replied without hesi­ occasion arose to use these defenses against the also to the valor of Count Casimir Pulaski, Aerial view of Fort Pulaski. tancy: "I am here to defend the Fort, not to Building of Fort Pulaski enemy. Polish friend of America during the Revolution, surrender it." The Federals immediately began who fell at the Siege of Savannah in 1779 and a 30-hour bombardment, during which the THE War of 1812 had shown the great weak­ whose name the fort bears. southeastern angle and wall of Fort Pulaski ness of American coastal defenses. In 1816, The Monument were successfully breached, forcing the 25-year- Congress created a military Board of Engineers Cockspur Island old Colonel Olmstead to surrender about 2 p. m. FORT PULASKI was established as a national for Seacoast Fortifications which undertook to on April 11. The supposedly impregnable for­ monument on October 15, 1924, by Presidential LYING at the mouth of the Savannah River. devise a new scheme of national defense to con­ tress had fallen, and with it were captured 385 proclamation under the jurisdiction of the War Cockspur Island has played a significant role in sist largely of the erection of new brick fortifi­ officers and men, 48 cannon, and a large quan­ Department. It was transferred in 1933 to the the economic development and military defense cations along our exposed coast lines. As a tity of supplies. supervision of the National Park Service. The of coastal Georgia. In the past two centuries, part of this plan. Cockspur Island was chosen Thus, Savannah, one of the principal seaports monument area now embraces 5,361.62 acres three forts have been built on this small marsh as the site of a new fort in the early 1820's. in the South, was cut off from all foreign trade. of Federal lands on McQueens and Cockspur island. Fort George, a palisaded log blockhouse Brig. Gen. Simon Bernard, famed military Since the fort was never relinquished by the Islands. On the latter island is located the his­ and earthen fortification, was begun in 1761 by engineer of Napoleon, who was associated with Federals, it was an effective unit in the blockade toric Georgia fortification, which is surrounded the Colonial Government to defend the harbor the new fortifications board from 1816 to 1831, that was eventually to throttle the economic by a beautiful natural marsh and a wooded area life of the South. Its casemates also served as a where are found many varieties of birds and The National Park System, of which this area is a unit, is dedicated to conserving the scenic, military and political prison in 1864-65. semitropical plants. scientific, and historic heritage of the United States for the benefit and inspiration of its people. 'Pott &ulcL4&i NATIONAL MONUMENT Georgia The Ramparts. Photo by O. Gregg Wilson. Wesley Memorial intendent for special service. The nominal admission fee is waived for children under 12 THE memorial stands on approximately the years of age and groups of school children site where John Wesley knelt to give thanks between the ages of 12 and 18 when accom­ for a safe crossing of the Atlantic Ocean. On panied by adults responsible for their safety coming to America as a missionary to the and conduct. Indians, Wesley landed on Cockspur Island, then called Peeper Island, on February 6, 1736. To commemorate this event, the A dministration Georgia Society, Colonial Dames of America, THE monument is administered by the Na­ erected the memorial cross. tional Park Service, U.S. Department of the Interior. A superintendent, whose address is How to Reach the Monument Box 204, Savannah Beach, Ga., is in imme­ FORT PULASKI is 17 miles east of Savannah diate charge. by way of U.S. 80. The entrance to the monument is on McQueens Island at U.S. 80. Mission 66 Transportation can be arranged with private MISSION 66 is a program designed to be com­ companies in Savannah. pleted by 1966 which will assure the maxi­ mum protection of the scenic, scientific, About Your Visit wilderness, and historic resources of the You may visit the monument from 8:30 a.m.
Recommended publications
  • Scientific and Technological Advances in World War I
    A Clever War: Scientific and Technological Advances in World War I Brian Weaver Central Bucks High School - West Doylestown, Pennsylvania Grade Level: 9 - 12 Objectives: At the conclusion of this lesson, students will be able to Explain different medical technology and techniques used in World War I Analyze historic photographs in order to determine the new types of technology utilized by armies in World War I Synthesize what inventions were used for by studying the photographs from World War I and connecting those inventions to tools used in modern life Compare and contrast the tools needed to support an army in 1914 with those of previous conflicts Demonstrate their writing skills by completing a group essay in a series of small steps Guiding Question: What new developments were armies forced to make during World War I both on and off the battlefield, and why did they make them? Connections to Common Core: CCSS.ELA-Literacy.RH.11-12.2 Determine the central ideas or information of a primary or secondary source; provide an accurate summary that makes clear the relationships among the key details and ideas. CCSS.ELA-Literacy.RH.11-12.3 Evaluate various explanations for actions or events and determine which explanation best accords with textual evidence, acknowledging where the text leaves matters uncertain. CCSS.ELA-Literacy.RH.11-12.9 Integrate information from diverse sources, both primary and secondary, into a coherent understanding of an idea or event, noting discrepancies among sources. Connections to C3 Framework: D2.His.2.9-12. Analyze change and continuity in historical eras.
    [Show full text]
  • Benjamin Oliver Davis, Sr.: a Biography (Courtesy of the US Army Heritage and Education Center)
    Benjamin Oliver Davis, Sr.: A Biography (Courtesy of the US Army Heritage and Education Center) Benjamin Oliver Davis, Sr. was born in Washington, D.C. on 1 July 1877 to Louis P. H. and Henrietta Davis. He attended M Street High School in Washington where he participated in the school’s cadet program. During the Spanish-American War, Davis briefly served in Company D, 1st Separate Battalion of the Washington D.C. National Guard. On 10 July 1898, Davis joined the 8th U.S. Volunteer Infantry Regiment as a first lieutenant of Company G. The 8th United States Volunteer Infantry was stationed at Chickamauga Park, Georgia, from October 1898 until the unit was disbanded in March 1899. On 14 June 1899, Davis enlisted in the Regular Army. He was assigned to Troop I, 3rd Squadron, 9th Cavalry at Ft. Duchesne, Utah, first as the troop’s clerk and then as squadron sergeant major. In the spring of 1901, Troop I was assigned to the Philippine Islands. In August 1901, he was assigned to Troop F, 10th Cavalry, where Davis assumed the duties of a second lieutenant after passing an officers' qualification test. Troop F returned to the United States in August 1902. Davis was then stationed at Fort Washakie, Wyoming, where he also served for several months with Troop M. In September 1905, he was assigned to Wilberforce University in Ohio as Professor of Military Science and Tactics, a post that he filled for four years. In November 1909, shortly after being ordered to Regimental Headquarters, 9th Cavalry, Davis was reassigned for duty to Liberia.
    [Show full text]
  • Military Science - MLS 1
    Military Science - MLS 1 MLS 202 Foundations of Tactical Leadership 3 Credits MILITARY SCIENCE - MLS This course examines the challenges of leading teams in the complex operational environment. The course highlights dimensions of terrain MLS 101 Introduction to the Army and Critical Thinking 3 Credits analysis, patrolling, and operations orders. Further study of the theoretical This course introduces Cadets to the personal challenges and competencies basis of the Army Leadership Requirements Model explores the dynamics that are critical for effective leadership. Cadets learn how the personal of adaptive leadership in the context of military operations. Cadets develop development of life skills such as critical thinking, time management, goal greater self awareness as they assess their own leadership styles and practice setting, stress management, and comprehensive fitness relate to leadership, communication and team building skills. Optional: leadership labs, three one- and the Army profession. Optional: Leadership Lab; three one-hour physical hour PRT sessions, one JFTX per semester. readiness training (PRT) sessions; one Field Training Exercise (FTX) per Offered: spring. semester. MLS 210 Basic Camp 3 Credits Offered: every fall. Required for all students seeking a Commission in the U.S. Army, Army MLS 102 Introduction to Profession of Arms 3 Credits Reserve or Army National Guard; this 29-day course is designed to This course introduces Cadets to the personal challenges and competencies challenge Cadets mentally, physically and prepare them to meet the that are critical for adaptive leadership. Cadets learn the basic of the challenges of becoming a Commissioned Officer. Basic Camp allows communications process and the importance for leader's to develop the students to enter the ROTC Advanced Course without having taken MLS100 essential skills to effectively communicate in the Army.
    [Show full text]
  • Department of Military Science (Army Rotc)
    DEPARTMENT OF MILITARY SCIENCE (ARMY ROTC) The Army Reserve Officers’ Training Corps (ROTC) program at Lander University is designed to enhance a student’s college education by providing unique training and practical experience in leadership and management – qualities essential to success in any career. The military science curriculum consists of a two-year basic course followed by the two-year advanced course. Upon graduation, contracted cadets who have successfully completed ROTC training are awarded a commission as a second lieutenant in the U.S. Army, U.S. Army National Guard, or the U.S. Army Reserve. The first-year basic course introduces the student to the Army and develops a Cadet who accepts the Army as a values-based organization and embraces the scholar-athlete-warrior ethos. The student develops familiarity with individual roles and responsibilities in support of team efforts and problem solving processes in military and non- military situations, demonstrates oral and written communication skills, understands resilience, and demonstrates a commitment to learning. The focus is on developing basic knowledge and comprehension of Army leadership dimensions, attributes and core leader competencies while gaining an understanding of the ROTC program, its purpose in the Army, and its advantages for the student. To prepare students to become commissioned officers, the ROTC program combines college courses in military science and leadership with summer training. The military science curriculum consists of a two-year basic course and a two-year advanced course. The basic course is normally taken during the freshman and sophomore years and covers management principles, national defense, military history, leadership development, military courtesy, customs and traditions of the military, and physical training.
    [Show full text]
  • Military Science
    Lehigh University 2021-22 1 Military Science The Department of Military Science, established in 1919, conducts active service obligation unless the degree is obtained at government the Army Reserve Officers Training Corps (ROTC) program at Lehigh expense. University. This is one of the oldest ROTC programs in the nation. The Course Credit Army ROTC program provides a means for students to qualify for a Students in the College of Arts and Sciences and the College of commission as an officer in the Active Army, Army Reserve, or Army Business may substitute military science advanced credits for six National Guard. hours of electives. In the College of Engineering and Applied Science, OVERVIEW six credits of advanced ROTC work are permissible within the normal The objectives of the military science program are to develop program of each student, irrespective of curriculum. For curricula that leadership and management ability in each student; to provide a include more than six hours of personal electives in the junior and basic understanding of the Army’s history, philosophy, organization, senior years, inclusion of the more than six hours of ROTC credit with responsibilities, and role in American society; and to develop normal programs can be effected only with the approval of academic fundamental professional knowledge and skills associated with advisers. All military science credits, including those in the basic officership. These objectives are achieved through classroom course, apply toward the student’s overall cumulative grade point instruction, leadership laboratories, realistic training scenarios, average. exposure to Army doctrine, professional development, leadership CAREER OPPORTUNITIES simulations, and individual assessment and counseling.
    [Show full text]
  • Military Science (Ms)
    MILITARY SCIENCE (MS) MILITARY SCIENCE (MS) MS.201 Leadership and Decision Making Prereq: MS.102 or permission of instructor ROTC subjects do not carry academic credit at MIT, but they can be U (Fall) counted toward the PE requirement. Up to two points per year with a 2-3-1 units maximum of four points. Familiarizes students with the professional practice of ethics Military Science within the Army by exploring Army values and ethics along with the fundamentals of leadership, personal development, and tactics at MS.101 Introduction to the Army and Critical Thinking the small unit level. Explores ethical and tactical decision-making Prereq: None. Coreq: MS.102 case studies. Students required to demonstrate writing skills and U (Fall, Spring) present information briengs as preparation for development in 1-3-2 units becoming successful future ocers. S. Kirk Introduces students to the personal challenges and competencies that are critical for eective leadership and communication. Explores MS.202 Army Doctrine and Team Development how the personal development of cultural understanding, goal Prereq: MS.201 or permission of instructor setting, time management, stress management and comprehensive U (Spring) tness relate to leadership, ocership, and the Army profession. 2-3-1 units D. Barrera Students practice and apply fundamentals of Army leadership, MS.102 Introduction to the Profession of Arms ocership, Army values and ethics, personal development, and Prereq: None. Coreq: MS.101 small unit tactics at the squad level. Provides systematic and specic U (Fall, Spring) feedback on individual leader attributes, values, and core leader 1-3-2 units competencies. Students demonstrate writing skills and present information briengs as preparation for development in becoming Introduces students to the professional challenges and successful future ocers.
    [Show full text]
  • Military Science Course Description
    Army ROTC Basic Course The Military Science Basic Course takes place during your first two years in college as elective classes. It normally involves one elective class and lab each term along with the requisite Physical Training (PT) and Field Training Exercises (FTX). You learn basic military skills, the fundamentals of leadership and start the groundwork toward becoming an Army leader. Attending the ROTC Basic Course incurs no military obligation. Military Science 100 Series Level Course Descriptions MS 111: Introduction to ROTC (1 Credit Hour) Introduction to ROTC, types of jobs available to Army Officers, Drill and Ceremony, PT, land navigation and the use of a magnetic compass with practical exercises and includes an FTX. MS 112: Land Navigation and Squad Fundamentals (1 Credit Hour) Introduction to customs, courtesies, and traditions of the U.S. Army, Map Reading and Land Navigation I, Tactics I and II, Field Craft, and Effective Communication with practical exercises. Includes an FTX. MS 113: Adventure Training (1 Credit Hour) Introduction to leadership values and attributes, U.S. weapons, map reading II with practical exercises, working as an integral part of a team and includes an FTX. MS 118: Military Physical Training (1 Credit Hour) Designed to prepare Army ROTC students to excel in the Army Physical Fitness Test (APFT). The APFT measures physical endurance in three timed events: two minutes of push-ups, two minutes of sit ups, and the two-mile timed run. Other exercises are included to enhance the components of fitness supported by the principles of exercise. Class is ran and instructed by Military Science III Cadets and supervised by Cadre.
    [Show full text]
  • The Science of Military Strategy from 2001 to 2013 [Book Chapter Draft]
    China’s Changing Approach to Military Strategy: The Science of Military Strategy from 2001 to 2013 [Book chapter draft] The MIT Faculty has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you. Your story matters. Citation Fravel, M. Taylor. (April 2016) "China’s Changing Approach to Military Strategy: The Science of Military Strategy from 2001 and 2013." In Joe McReynolds (Ed.), The Evolution of China’s Military Strategy. Washington, DC: Jamestown Foundation, 2016. As Published https://ssp.mit.edu/publications/2016/chinas-changing-approach- to-military-strategy Version Author's final manuscript Citable link http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/109318 Terms of Use Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike Detailed Terms http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ Massachusetts Institute of Technology Political Science Department Research Paper No. 2016-15 China’s Changing Approach to Military Strategy: The Science of Military Strategy from 2001 and 2013 M. Taylor Fravel Massachusetts Institute of Technology Do Not Cite or Circulate Without Permission from Author China’s Changing Approach to Military Strategy: The Science of Military Strategy from 2001 and 2013 M. Taylor Fravel Department of Political Science Massachusetts Institute of Technology April 2016 Draft of a chapter to appear in Joe McReynolds, ed., The Evolution of China’s Military Strategy (Washington, DC: Brookings forthcoming) Abstract The 2013 publication of the Science of Military Strategy is an essential source for understanding how China’s thinking about military strategy is changing. To examine how China’s approach to military strategy is changing, this chapter compares the 2013 edition of the Science of Military Strategy with the 2001 edition.
    [Show full text]
  • China Military Strategy
    Cover China’s strategic thought is strongly influenced by three authors: Sun Tzu, Karl Marx, and Mao Zedong, according to Chinese sources. The methodology and philosophy of these men impact how Chinese strategists consider their battlefield context and accordingly develop their plans and procedures for the conduct of military operations. The views expressed in this document are those of the author and do not reflect the official policy or position of the Department of Defense or the US government. The author works for the Foreign Military Studies Office (FMSO), Fort Leavenworth, Kansas. FMSO is a component of the US Army's Training and Doctrine Command (TRADOC). The FMSO does strategic, guidance-driven, unclassified research and analysis of the foreign perspective of unconsidered/understudied security issues of the military operational environment. FMSO is the Army’s principal unclassified researcher, leader educator, and operational-support resource regarding the foreign perspective of the Operational Environment, and the Army’s leading advanced open source education developer, provider, and collaboration organization. TIMOTHY L. THOMAS FOREIGN MILITARY STUDIES OFFICE (FMSO) FORT LEAVENWORTH, KS 2014 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION .................................................................................. 1 PART ONE: WHAT IS STRATEGY? ................................................. 9 CHAPTER ONE: CHINA’S MILITARY STRATEGY: WHERE KARL TRUMPS CARL ...................................................................... 11 Introduction
    [Show full text]
  • Military Science
    Military Science The Army Reserve Officers’ Training Corps (ROTC) is the primary source of college-trained, federally commissioned officers for the United States Army, the Army Reserve, and the Army National Guard. Army ROTC is currently offered at over 1,000 universities and colleges across the country. Army ROTC is a four-year elective program and is open to students regardless of their major. It is divided into two parts: the Basic Course and the Advanced Course. The Basic Course is normally attended during the freshman Employment Opportunities and sophomore years. No military commitment or obligation At the beginning of the student’s senior year, the student is incurred in the Basic Course for students unless they are designates which branch of the Army he or she wishes to serve receiving an Army ROTC Scholarship. Students may withdraw in. The following is a list of career fields available: at any time before the beginning of the third year. Combat Arms: Air Defense Artillery, Armor, Field Artillery, To enter the Advanced Course, students agree to graduate and Infantry. and finish the ROTC program and then accept a federal commission and an assignment in either the active duty (full- Combat Support: Aviation, Chemical, Engineers, Military time) or in the reserve forces, i.e. Army Reserves or Army Intelligence, Military Police, and Signal. National Guard (part-time). The active-duty career option is Combat Service Support: Adjutant General, Chemical, usually three years for non-Army ROTC scholarship students Finance, Medical Service, Nursing, Ordnance, Quartermaster, and four years for an Army ROTC scholarship student.
    [Show full text]
  • The Science of Military Strategy
    Naval War College Review Volume 60 Article 11 Number 3 Summer 2007 The cS ience of Military Strategy, Andrew S. Erickson Follow this and additional works at: https://digital-commons.usnwc.edu/nwc-review Recommended Citation Erickson, Andrew S. (2007) "The cS ience of Military Strategy,," Naval War College Review: Vol. 60 : No. 3 , Article 11. Available at: https://digital-commons.usnwc.edu/nwc-review/vol60/iss3/11 This Book Review is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at U.S. Naval War College Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Naval War College Review by an authorized editor of U.S. Naval War College Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Color profile: Generic CMYK printer profile Composite Default screen Erickson: The Science of Military Strategy, BOOK REVIEWS AN ACCESSIBLE WINDOW INTO CHINESE MILITARY THOUGHT Peng Guangqian and Yao Youzhi, eds. The Science of Military Strategy. Beijing: Military Science Publishing House, 2005. 504pp. $40 This first English-language volume on published by China’s National Defense strategy by China’s People’s Liberation University in 2000, the better to under- Army (PLA) was translated by a team of stand actual PLA doctrine. The closest experts at the Academy of Military Sci- U.S. equivalent to these volumes collec- ences from the original Chinese-language tively might be Doctrine for Joint Opera- version (Zhanlüexue, 2001). Edited by tions (Joint Publication 3-0). two major generals with significant Part One surveys China’s historical ex- ability to shape PLA strategy as advisers perience and development of military to China’s powerful Central Military theory.
    [Show full text]
  • The PLA and China's Rejuvenation: National Security and Military
    The PLA and China’s Rejuvenation National Security and Military Strategies, Deterrence Concepts, and Combat Capabilities Timothy R. Heath, Kristen Gunness, Cortez A. Cooper C O R P O R A T I O N For more information on this publication, visit www.rand.org/t/RR1402 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data ISBN: 978-0-8330-9571-8 Published by the RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, Calif. © Copyright 2016 RAND Corporation R® is a registered trademark. Cover: Tiananmen Flag Rising by Elvir K via Flickr. Limited Print and Electronic Distribution Rights This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited. Permission is given to duplicate this document for personal use only, as long as it is unaltered and complete. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial use. For information on reprint and linking permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions. The RAND Corporation is a research organization that develops solutions to public policy challenges to help make communities throughout the world safer and more secure, healthier and more prosperous. RAND is nonprofit, nonpartisan, and committed to the public interest. RAND’s publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors. Support RAND Make a tax-deductible charitable contribution at www.rand.org/giving/contribute www.rand.org Preface This study describes China’s national and security strategies and its approach to war and esca- lation control; summarizes its capabilities developments; and reviews its concepts for deter- rence in strategic (nuclear, space, and cyber) and conventional domains.
    [Show full text]