Decision on a Last Resort Supplier Payment Claim from Scottishpower

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Decision on a Last Resort Supplier Payment Claim from Scottishpower Gas and Electricity Suppliers, Electricity Distribution Network Operators, Gas Transporters Email: [email protected] and all other interested parties Date: 29 January 2021 Dear colleagues, Decision on Last Resort Supply Payment claim from ScottishPower Energy Retail Limited On 7 December 2020, we1 published our minded-to position2 on a claim by ScottishPower Energy Retail Limited (“ScottishPower”) for a Last Resort Supply Payment (“LRSP”). ScottishPower is seeking to claim for costs incurred in acting as a Supplier of Last Resort (“SoLR”) to former customers of Extra Energy Supply Limited (“Extra Energy”). We received two confidential responses to our consultation. This letter confirms our decision to consent to ScottishPower claiming a LRSP of up to £10.6m.3 Our decision will allow ScottishPower to recover the costs of protecting the credit balances owed to former customers of Extra Energy, and certain other costs incurred in complying with the terms of the Last Resort Supply Direction (“LRSD”).4 In taking this decision, we have had due regard to Ofgem’s principal objective of protecting the interests of current and future energy consumers, the relevant provisions of ScottishPower’s gas and electricity supply licences, Ofgem’s “Guidance on supplier of last resort and energy supply company administration orders” (our “Guidance”),5 the terms of the LRSD and the particular circumstances of compliance with the LRSD. 1 References to the “Authority”, “Ofgem”, “we” and “our” are used interchangeably in this document. The Authority refers to GEMA, the Gas and Electricity Markets Authority. The Office of Gas and Electricity Markets (Ofgem) supports GEMA in its day-to-day work 2 Consultation on a Last Resort Supply Payment Claim from Scottish Power Energy Retail Limited 3 £10.573m 4 Direction to appoint ScottishPower Energy Retail Limited as Gas Supplier of Last Resort and Direction to appoint ScottishPower Energy Retail Limited as Electricity Supplier of Last Resort. 5 Supplier of Last Resort: Revised Guidance 2016. The Office of Gas and Electricity Markets Commonwealth House, 32 Albion Street, Glasgow, G1 1LH Tel 020 7901 7000 www.ofgem.gov.uk As per Supply Licence Condition 9 (Claims for Last Resort Supply Payment), a SoLR may make a claim for a LRSP from relevant distribution networks where we have given our consent to the amount claimed.6 ScottishPower’s claim is for £13.6m.7 This letter sets out the reasons for our decision to consent to a claim from ScottishPower for a LRSP of up to £10.6m.8 Background The SoLR process Electricity and gas supply is a competitive activity in Great Britain. Competition has the potential to bring many benefits to consumers but in a competitive market, companies that are not operating efficiently may fail. This applies as much in relation to the gas and electricity supply markets as it does to other markets. It is Ofgem’s statutory duty to protect customers’ interests in light of supplier failure. When a supplier fails, our focus is to ensure continuity of supply for its customers and to minimise wider negative impacts on the market. These wider effects stem from the fact that if an energy supplier fails, its customers will continue to be physically supplied with gas and/or electricity, but the supplier will not be able to meet the costs of providing this energy. In these circumstances, the costs of procuring the necessary electricity will be smeared across all suppliers and the costs of procuring gas will fall to the relevant shipper. There is also a real risk that if a supplier fails without urgent intervention, consumer trust and confidence in the energy market could be materially damaged. Ofgem can ensure continuity of supply to the failed supplier’s customers and minimise these wider negative effects by appointing a SoLR to supply the failed supplier’s customers at very short notice.9 6 In accordance with Standard Condition 9 of the electricity and gas supply licences 7 £13.635m. 8 £10.573m 9 The obligation for a supplier to comply with a LRSD derives from standard licence condition 8 of each supplier’s gas and electricity supply licences and is intended to ensure a universal service for Great British energy consumers (for further information on this universal service, see Article 27 of the Directive (EU) 2019/944, as retained in domestic law). The duties of a SoLR are further described in our Guidance and the LRSD contains specific details of ScottishPower’s obligations to supply Extra Energy’s former customers. The Office of Gas and Electricity Markets Commonwealth House, 32 Albion Street, Glasgow, G1 1LH Tel 020 7901 7000 www.ofgem.gov.uk Claim for a Last Resort Supply Payment As set out in the gas and electricity supply standard licence conditions, a supplier may make a claim for any additional costs it incurs in complying with a LRSD.10 As part of their competitive bid to become a SoLR, a supplier will include whether they expect to make a claim for a LRSP, or whether it will waive this right, in whole or in part. As stated in our Guidance, our preference is for the SoLR not to make any claim, and we expect efficient SoLRs to be able to minimise their exposure to otherwise unrecoverable costs to reduce the costs smeared across the rest of the market through a LRSP. In our Guidance, we explain that we will decide on a case-by-case basis whether it might be appropriate for a SoLR to make a claim under these arrangements. We also explain that we would consider whether the amount of any claim or the reasons for any claim were reasonable. In that Guidance, we note that, in certain circumstances, we may consider it appropriate to approve a claim where it relates to costs associated with the protection of customers who held a credit balance with the failed supplier. ScottishPower indicated at the time of our SoLR appointment process that it would not waive its right to make a claim. ScottishPower committed to funding £10m of open and closed credit balances and said that it would claim for any balances above this £10m level and associated costs, for example to cover working capital requirements. Our decision On balance, taking into consideration all information available to us and the specific circumstances of this case, we are minded to consent to ScottishPower claiming a LRSP of up to £10.6m.11 We have taken this decision in light of the broader market considerations and our wider statutory duties to protect both existing and future consumers. Our decision will enable ScottishPower to recover up to this amount from relevant gas and electricity distribution network licensees. This is subject to any costs recovered by ScottishPower from its claim from the Extra Energy liquidation process. For the avoidance 10 Standard condition 9 of the electricity and gas supply licences. 11 £10.573m The Office of Gas and Electricity Markets Commonwealth House, 32 Albion Street, Glasgow, G1 1LH Tel 020 7901 7000 www.ofgem.gov.uk of any doubt, we consider on a case-by-case basis whether it may be appropriate for any SoLR to make a claim for a LRSP. We have set out below our reasons for our decision. This should not be taken as setting a precedent for any future claims, which would also be considered on their merits and on a case-by-case basis, taking into account all relevant circumstances of the particular case. Our reasons for our decision Our decision will allow ScottishPower to recover the cost of refunding credit balances owed to former customers of Extra Energy and for the cost incurred in relation to service/operational work, data quality and interest on the cost of working capital. We do not consent to the recovery of the cost of item 4, consumer debt. Table 1: ScottishPower LRSP claim – decision Item Cost Category associated with Cost claimed Decision SoLR (£k) (£k) 1 Recovery of customer credit 6,526 6,526 balances 2 Service/Operational 2,547 2,547 3 Data quality 313 313 4 Consumer debt 3,062 0 5 Working capital 1,187 1,187 Total 13,635 10,573 Credit balances ScottishPower is claiming £6.5m12 for the costs of credit balances refunded to former domestic customers of Extra Energy for open and closed customer credit balances. Our Guidance states that we may in certain circumstances approve a claim associated with costs incurred in repaying credit balances to customers who had a positive credit balance with a failed supplier. 12 £6.526m The Office of Gas and Electricity Markets Commonwealth House, 32 Albion Street, Glasgow, G1 1LH Tel 020 7901 7000 www.ofgem.gov.uk We are satisfied in this case (subject to the points discussed below) that the claimed amount is consistent with the relevant criteria and, in particular, is consistent with the commitments made by ScottishPower in its SoLR bid. We have considered whether the costs ScottishPower is seeking to claim for credit balances are otherwise unrecoverable; we consider that it should be possible for ScottishPower to recover some of this claimed amount through the ongoing administration process for Extra Energy. We expect a SoLR making a claim for a LRSP to have taken all reasonable steps to make and pursue a claim from the administration/liquidation of the failed supplier for the cost of outstanding credit balances. The current licence provisions related to LRSPs do not require us to make our decision on ScottishPower’s claim ahead of the conclusion of the liquidation process. However, in our view, delaying a decision until the conclusion of the liquidation process would introduce a disproportionate degree of uncertainty around the timing of any approved LRSP claim, and ultimately increase the future costs liable to by paid by energy suppliers and consumers.
Recommended publications
  • SUSTAINABILITY REPORT ROYAL DUTCH SHELL PLC SUSTAINABILITY REPORT 2011 I Shell Sustainability Report 2011 Introduction
    SUSTAINABILITY REPORT ROYAL DUTCH SHELL PLC SUSTAINABILITY REPORT 2011 i Shell Sustainability Report 2011 Introduction CONTENTS ABOUT SHELL INTRODUCTION Shell is a global group of energy and petrochemical companies employing 90,000 people in more than 80 i ABOUT SHELL countries. Our aim is to help meet the energy needs of 1 INTRODUCTION FROM THE CEO society in ways that are economically, environmentally and socially responsible. OUR APPROACH Upstream 2 BUILDING A SUSTAINABLE ENERGY FUTURE Upstream consists of two organisations, Upstream International and Upstream Americas. Upstream searches for and recovers oil 3 SD AND OUR BUSINESS STRATEGY and natural gas, extracts heavy oil from oil sands for conversion 4 SAFETY into synthetic crudes, liqueƂ es natural gas and produces synthetic oil products using gas-to-liquids technology. It often works in joint 5 COMMUNITIES ventures, including those with national oil companies. Upstream 6 CLIMATE CHANGE markets and trades natural gas and electricity in support of its business. Our wind power activities are part of Upstream. Upstream 8 ENVIRONMENT International co-ordinates sustainable development policies and 9 LIVING BY OUR PRINCIPLES social performance across Shell. Downstream OUR ACTIVITIES Downstream manufactures, supplies and markets oil products and 10 SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT IN ACTION chemicals worldwide. Our Manufacturing and Supply businesses include reƂ neries, chemical plants and the supply and distribution 11 KEY PROJECTS of feedstocks and products. Marketing sells a range of products 12 DELIVERING ENERGY RESPONSIBLY including fuels, lubricants, bitumen and liqueƂ ed petroleum 12 Natural gas gas for home, transport and industrial use. Chemicals markets 15 The Arctic petrochemicals for industrial customers.
    [Show full text]
  • ENERGY DARWINISM the Evolution of the Energy Industry
    ENERGY DARWINISM The Evolution of the Energy Industry Citi GPS: Global Perspectives & Solutions October 2013 J ason Channell Heath R J ansen Alastair R Syme Sofia Savvantidou Edward L Morse Anthony Yuen Citi is one of the world’s largest financial institutions, operating in all major established and emerging markets. Across these world markets, our employees conduct an ongoing multi-disciplinary global conversation – accessing information, analyzing data, developing insights, and formulating advice for our clients. As our premier thought-leadership product, Citi GPS is designed to help our clients navigate the global economy’s most demanding challenges, identify future themes and trends, and help our clients profit in a fast-changing and interconnected world. Citi GPS accesses the best elements of our global conversation and harvests the thought leadership of a wide range of senior professionals across our firm. This is not a research report and does not constitute advice on investments or a solicitation to buy or sell any financial instrument. For more information on Citi GPS, please visit www.citi.com/citigps. Citi GPS: Global Perspectives & Solutions October 2013 Jason Channell is a Director and Global Head of Citi's Alternative Energy and Cleantech equity research team. Throughout his career Jason's research has spanned the energy spectrum of utilities, oil & gas, and alternative energy. He has worked for both buy and sell-side firms, including Goldman Sachs and Fidelity Investments, and has been highly ranked in the Institutional Investor, Extel and Starmine external surveys. His knowledge has led to significant interaction with regulators and policymakers, most notably presenting to members of the US Senate Energy and Finance committees, and to United Nations think-tanks.
    [Show full text]
  • The Economics of Wind Energy. Collection of Papers For
    EWEA Special Topic Conference *95 THE ECONOMICS OF WIND ENERGY 5.-7. September 1995, Finland EWEA Helsinki COLLECTION OF PAPERS FOR DISCUSSIONS Edited by Harri Vihriala, Finnish Wind Power Association D IMATRAN VOIMA OY DISTRIBUTION OF THIS DOCUMENT IS WUMTTED /IaA I 1 1 DISCLAIMER Portions of this document may be illegible in electronic image products. Images are produced from the best available original document. Table of Index Table of Index i A Word from Editor iii Session A: National Programmes & Operational experience Panel 1: A1 Jagadeesh A, India: Wind Energy looking ahead in Andra Pradesh A2 Gupta, India: Economics of Generation of Electricity by Wind in India. A3 Padmashree R Bakshi, India: The Economics on Establishing a 10 MW Windfarm in Tamil Nadu, South India. A4 Ruben Post, Estonia: Wind energy make difficult start in Estonia. AS Moved to E6 A6 Barra Luciano, Italy: Status and Perspectives of Wind Turbine Installations in Italy. Panel 2: A7 Voicu Gh. et Al., Romania: Economic and Financial Analysis for Favourable Wind Sites in Romania. A8 Gyulai Francisc, Romania: Considerations Concemig the Costs of the 300 kW Wind Units Developed in Romania. A9 Vaidyanathan, India: Economics of Wind Power Development - an Indian experience. A10 Rave Klaus, Germany: 1000 WEC's in 6 years - Wind Energy Development in Schleswig -Holstein. All Koch Martin, Germany: Financial assistance for investments in wind power in Germany - Business incentives provided by the Deutsche Ausgleichsbank. A12 Helby Peter, Sweden: Rationality of the subsidy regime for wind power in Sweden and Denmark. Session B: Grid Issues and Avoided Direct Costs Panel 1: B1 Grusell Gunnar, Sweden: A Model for Calculating the Economy of Wind Power Plants.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 7 on Energy Systems Gas (GHG) Emissions
    7 Energy Systems Coordinating Lead Authors: Thomas Bruckner (Germany), Igor Alexeyevich Bashmakov (Russian Federation), Yacob Mulugetta (Ethiopia / UK) Lead Authors: Helena Chum (Brazil / USA), Angel De la Vega Navarro (Mexico), James Edmonds (USA), Andre Faaij (Netherlands), Bundit Fungtammasan (Thailand), Amit Garg (India), Edgar Hertwich (Austria / Norway), Damon Honnery (Australia), David Infield (UK), Mikiko Kainuma (Japan), Smail Khennas (Algeria / UK), Suduk Kim (Republic of Korea), Hassan Bashir Nimir (Sudan), Keywan Riahi (Austria), Neil Strachan (UK), Ryan Wiser (USA), Xiliang Zhang (China) Contributing Authors: Yumiko Asayama (Japan), Giovanni Baiocchi (UK / Italy), Francesco Cherubini (Italy / Norway), Anna Czajkowska (Poland / UK), Naim Darghouth (USA), James J. Dooley (USA), Thomas Gibon (France / Norway), Haruna Gujba (Ethiopia / Nigeria), Ben Hoen (USA), David de Jager (Netherlands), Jessica Jewell (IIASA / USA), Susanne Kadner (Germany), Son H. Kim (USA), Peter Larsen (USA), Axel Michaelowa (Germany / Switzerland), Andrew Mills (USA), Kanako Morita (Japan), Karsten Neuhoff (Germany), Ariel Macaspac Hernandez (Philippines / Germany), H-Holger Rogner (Germany), Joseph Salvatore (UK), Steffen Schlömer (Germany), Kristin Seyboth (USA), Christoph von Stechow (Germany), Jigeesha Upadhyay (India) Review Editors: Kirit Parikh (India), Jim Skea (UK) Chapter Science Assistant: Ariel Macaspac Hernandez (Philippines / Germany) 511 Energy Systems Chapter 7 This chapter should be cited as: Bruckner T., I. A. Bashmakov, Y. Mulugetta, H. Chum, A. de la Vega Navarro, J. Edmonds, A. Faaij, B. Fungtammasan, A. Garg, E. Hertwich, D. Honnery, D. Infield, M. Kainuma, S. Khennas, S. Kim, H. B. Nimir, K. Riahi, N. Strachan, R. Wiser, and X. Zhang, 2014: Energy Systems. In: Climate Change 2014: Mitigation of Climate Change. Contribution of Working Group III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [Edenhofer, O., R.
    [Show full text]
  • Carbon Capture Utilization and Storage
    Carbon Capture Utilization and Storage Towards Net-Zero 2021 Compiled by the Kearney Energy Transition Institute Carbon Capture Utilization and Storage Acknowledgements The Kearney Energy Transition Institute wishes to acknowledge the following people for their review of this FactBook: Kamel Bennaceur, CEO at Nomadia Energy Consulting, Former Director of Sustainable Energy Policies and Technologies at IEA, former Minister of Industry, Energy and Mines of Tunisia; as well as Dr. Adnan Shihab-Eldin, Claude Mandil, Antoine Rostand, and Richard Forrest, members of the board for the Kearney Energy Transition Institute. Their review does not imply that they endorse this FactBook or agree with any specific statements herein. About the FactBook: Carbon Capture Utilization and Storage This FactBook seeks to provide an overview of the latest changes in the carbon capture, utilization and storage landscape. It summarizes the main research and development priorities in carbon capture, utilisation and storage, analyses the policies, technologies and economics and presents the status and future of large-scale integrated projects. About the Kearney Energy Transition Institute The Kearney Energy Transition Institute is a non-profit organization that provides leading insights on global trends in energy transition, technologies, and strategic implications for private-sector businesses and public-sector institutions. The Institute is dedicated to combining objective technological insights with economical perspectives to define the consequences and opportunities for decision-makers in a rapidly changing energy landscape. The independence of the Institute fosters unbiased primary insights and the ability to co-create new ideas with interested sponsors and relevant stakeholders. Authors Romain Debarre, Prashant Gahlot, Céleste Grillet and Mathieu Plaisant 2 Executive Summary……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….
    [Show full text]
  • Energy Supply
    4 Energy Supply Coordinating Lead Authors: Ralph E.H. Sims (New Zealand), Robert N. Schock (USA) Lead Authors: Anthony Adegbululgbe (Nigeria), Jørgen Fenhann (Denmark), Inga Konstantinaviciute (Lithuania), William Moomaw (USA), Hassan B. Nimir (Sudan), Bernhard Schlamadinger (Austria), Julio Torres-Martínez (Cuba), Clive Turner (South Africa), Yohji Uchiyama (Japan), Seppo J.V. Vuori (Finland), Njeri Wamukonya (Kenya), Xiliang Zhang (China) Contributing Authors: Arne Asmussen (Germany), Stephen Gehl (USA), Michael Golay (USA), Eric Martinot (USA) Review Editors: Hans Larsen (Denmark), José Roberto Moreira (Brazil) This chapter should be cited as: R.E.H. Sims, R.N. Schock, A. Adegbululgbe, J. Fenhann, I. Konstantinaviciute, W. Moomaw, H.B. Nimir, B. Schlamadinger, J. Torres-Martínez, C. Turner, Y. Uchiyama, S.J.V. Vuori, N. Wamukonya, X. Zhang, 2007: Energy supply. In Climate Change 2007: Mitigation. Contribution of Working Group III to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [B. Metz, O.R. Davidson, P.R. Bosch, R. Dave, L.A. Meyer (eds)], Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA. Energy Supply Chapter 4 Table of Contents Executive Summary .................................................. 253 4.4 Mitigation costs and potentials of energy supply ................................................................. 289 4.1 Introduction ...................................................... 256 4.4.1. Carbon dioxide emissions from energy supply 4.1.1 Summary of Third Assessment Report (TAR) .... 258 by 2030 ........................................................... 289 4.2 Status of the sector .......................................... 258 4.4.2 Cost analyses .................................................. 290 4.4.3 Evaluation of costs and potentials for low-carbon, 4.2.1 Global development trends in the energy sector energy-supply technologies ............................. 293 (production and consumption) ........................
    [Show full text]
  • User Registered Company Number Registered Company Address
    Registered Company User Number Registered Company Address Category of Use 3R Energy Solution Limited SC354680 The Mechanics Workshop, New Lanark, Lanark, Lanarkshire ML11 9DB Directly Connected Power Station Aberarder Wind Farm 00398487 Beaufort Court,Egg Farm Lane,Kings Langley,Hertfordshire,WD4 8LR Directly Connected Power Station Aberdeen Offshore Wind Farm Limited SC278869 Johnstone House, 52-54 Rose Street, Aberdeen, AB10 1HA Directly Connected Power Station Abergelli Power Limited 08190497 Drax Power Station, Selby, North Yorkshire, YO88PH Directly Connected Power Station Abernedd Power Company Limited 06383166 6th Floor, Riverside Building, County Hall, London SE1 7BF Directly Connected Power Station ABO WIND UK LIMITED SC314110 1 Houstoun Interchange Business Park, Livingston, West Lothian, EH54 5DW Directly Connected Power Station First Floor , 500 Pavillion Drive , Northampton Business Park ,Northampton A'Chruach Wind Farm Limited 06572505 ,NN4 7YL Directly Connected Power Station Addito Supply Limited 8053202 1 America Square, Crosswall, London, EC3N 2SG Interconnector User AES Energy Limited 3896738 37 Kew Foot Road, Richmond, Surrey, TW9 2SS Supplier Unit 7 Riverside Business Centre, Brighton Road, Shoreham-By-Sea, West Affect Energy 9263368 Sussex, England, BN43 6RE Supplier Embedded Exemptable Large Power Aikengall Community Wind Company Limited SC313596 Edinburgh Quay, 133 Fountain Bridge, Edinburgh, EH3 9AG Station Suite F3 Clyde View, Riverside Business Park, 22 Pottery Street, Greenock, Airies Wind Farm Limited SC407954
    [Show full text]
  • The Case for Fossil Fuel Divestment University of Manchester Students' Union and Fossil Free Manchester
    The Case for Fossil Fuel Divestment University of Manchester Students’ Union and Fossil Free Manchester The Case for Fossil Fuel Divestment – University of Manchester Students’ Union and Fossil Free Manchester Overall argument We believe that the actions and activities of Fossil Fuel companies are unethical and immoral, and that the holding of investments in fossil fuels is incompatible with the University’s values and policies. We call for the University to divest from its assets in fossil fuel companies to demonstrate its commitment to its values, support scientific inquiry and demonstrate positive moral leadership on this issue. The University’s commitment to social responsibility The University is an organisation created to contribute to society. Its founding charter states its objects are to “advance education, knowledge and wisdom by research, scholarship, learning and teaching, for the benefit of individual and society at large.” The University has also committed, through its 2020 strategic plan, to further advance its contribution to Society by being “an ethical organisation with exemplary policies and procedures which will lead to the highest standards in all our activities”. In addition, the strategic plan also commits the University to “environmental sustainability, setting and meeting the highest possible standards across the full range of our activities”. Specifically on investments, the University has committed through its Socially Responsible Investment Policy to “reduce and ideally eliminate, irresponsible corporate behaviour leading to: environmental degradation; armament sales to military regimes; human rights violations; the institutionalisation of poverty through discriminatory market practices; racial or sexual discrimination; tobacco production, cultivation and manufacture; the exploitation of workers; the giving or receiving of bribes.” The University has previously divested itself for this reason from tobacco companies and any companies linked to the defence or aerospace sector.
    [Show full text]
  • Energy Best Deal Evaluation Report
    Energy Best Deal Evaluation Report, 2013/2014 July 2014 Prepared by: Centre for Sustainable Energy 3 St Peter’s Court Bedminster Parade Bristol BS3 4AQ Tel: 0117 9341 400 Fax: 0117 9341 410 Email: [email protected] Web: www.cse.org.uk Registered charity no.298740 Contents Contents .................................................................................................................................................. 1 Summary of key findings ......................................................................................................................... 2 Methods .................................................................................................................................................. 5 Consumers: questionnaire responses ..................................................................................................... 7 Consumers: follow‐up interviews ......................................................................................................... 12 Frontline workers: questionnaire responses ........................................................................................ 20 Frontline workers: follow‐up interviews ............................................................................................... 26 Quality of the presentation and materials ............................................................................................ 34 2012/2013 participant interviews – consumers ................................................................................... 37 2012/2013
    [Show full text]
  • The University of Oklahoma Graduate College
    THE UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA GRADUATE COLLEGE HYDRAULIC FRACTURING OF POORLY CONSOLIDATED FORMATIONS: CONSIDERATIONS ON ROCK PROPERTIES AND FAILURE MECHANISMS A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE GRADUATE FACULTY In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY by IVAN GIL Norman, Oklahoma 2005 UMI Number: 3152841 UMI Microform 3152841 Copyright 2005 by ProQuest Information and Learning Company. All rights reserved. This microform edition is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code. ProQuest Information and Learning Company 300 North Zeeb Road P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, MI 48106-1346 HYDRAULIC FRACTURING OF POORLY CONSOLIDATED FORMATIONS: CONSIDERATIONS ON ROCK PROPERTIES AND FAILURE MECHANISMS A DISSERTATION APPROVED FOR THE MEWBOURNE SCHOOL OF PETROLEUM AND GEOLOGICAL ENGINEERING BY _________________________ Dr. Jean-Claude Roegiers (Chairman) _________________________ Dr. Richard Hughes _________________________ Dr. Roy Knapp _________________________ Dr. Subhash Shah _________________________ Dr. Luther White © Copyright by Ivan Gil, 2005 All Rights Reserved To my parents and unconditional friends, who taught me that anything is possible; thank you Luis and Dora To Sandra, my support and partner in life To a little bundle of energy and source of inspiration called Gabriel To my sister Adriana and my brother Ronald iv Acknowledgements I would like to express my heartfelt appreciation and gratitude to Dr. Jean-Claude Roegiers, my advisor and mentor. His support, guidance, and encouragement made the completion of my studies possible. It was through him that I started enjoying the absorbing world of rock mechanics. I have been honored to receive from Dr. Roegiers, priceless lessons in both technical and personal aspects.
    [Show full text]
  • Energywatch Super-Complaint + 10: the Lost Decade
    energywatch super-complaint + 10: The Lost Decade Consumer Experience of Energy Billing Issues 2005–2015 Final Report by Andrew Faulk, Independent Consumer Energy Consultant, on behalf of the Citizens Advice Service June 2015 Fall 08 energywatch super-complaint + 10: The Lost Decade Consumer Experience of Energy Billing Issues 2005–2015 Table of Contents ABOUT US III CITIZENS ADVICE SERVICE IN ENGLAND, WALES AND SCOTLAND III ABOUT THIS REPORT V EXECUTIVE SUMMARY VI THE ENERGYWATCH SUPER-COMPLAINT VI CHANGES TO BILLS SINCE 2005 VII FUTURE CHANGES: SMART METER ROLL-OUT VIII INTRODUCTION 1 1. DEFINING THE BOUNDARIES OF ‘BILLS AND BILLING’ 6 2. ENERGYWATCH SUPER-COMPLAINT 8 OFGEM RESPONSE TO THE ENERGYWATCH SUPER-COMPLAINT 13 3. CHANGES IN THE GB ENERGY MARKET 2005–2015 16 4. CHANGES TO BILLING INTRODUCED BY OFGEM 24 5. CURRENT ENERGY BILL CONTENT, IMPACTS ON SWITCHING RATES AND CONSUMER UNDERSTANDING OF ENERGY BILLS 33 6. CURRENT ENERGY COMPLAINTS AND COSTS 45 6. TRUST IN THE ENERGY SECTOR AND BILLING 68 8. BILLING CHANGES AS A RESULT OF THE INTRODUCTION OF SMART METERS 79 9. SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS 92 ii energywatch super-complaint + 10: The Lost Decade Consumer Experience of Energy Billing Issues 2005–2015 About us Citizens Advice Service in England, Wales and Scotland The Citizens Advice Service provides free, confidential and impartial advice to help people resolve their problems. As the UK’s largest advice provider, the Citizens Advice Service is equipped to deal with any issue, from anyone, spanning debt and employment to housing and immigration plus everything in between. We value diversity, promote equality and challenge discrimination.
    [Show full text]
  • What Does the Power Outage on 9 August 2019 Tell Us About GB Power System Janusz Bialek
    What does the power outage on 9 August 2019 tell us about GB power system EPRG Working Paper 2006 Cambridge Working Paper in Economics 2018 Janusz Bialek Professor of Power and Energy Systems, Newcastle University, UK Full Professor, Skolkovo Institute of Science and Technology (Skoltech), Russia Abstract The power outage on 9th August 2019 affected over 1 million customers in England and Wales and caused a major disruption to other critical infrastructures. While the power system responded exactly how it was designed to in response to an unsecured (N-2) event, it has uncovered important fault lines which may significantly affect reliability of the system in a near future. Over the last 10 years or so the GB power system has changed quite rapidly due to the decarbonisation drive and penetration of smart grids technologies. Hence it is increasingly difficult for the ESO to fully monitor, model and control the whole system and therefore the probability of hidden common modes of failures has increased. This would suggest that it might be prudent to strengthen the old (N-1) security standard by providing extra security margin. There were also other issues highlighted by the outage. Embedded generation reached such a high penetration level that it cannot be treated any longer as negative demand. Traditional under-frequency load shedding disconnects indiscriminately all customers on the disconnected feeders, including embedded generation and frequency response units, hence reducing its effectiveness. The ability of critical infrastructures and services to ride through the disturbances has to be closely monitored and tested. Finally, we have concluded that, in GB at least, power outages matter only if they affect critical infrastructures, especially transport, in London and the surrounding areas.
    [Show full text]