Propagating California Wild Grape

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Propagating California Wild Grape Ratings of rooting systems (left) were best, good, and fair. Almost all types of vine wood yielded good root systems and resulted in vigorous plants. Propagating California wild grape James A. Robbins 0 David W. Burger Easy to start from cuttings, the vine is useful in landscape plantings California native plants are being used fluenced by such factors as date of collec- ing at that time, sap was flowing freely in increasingly in landscape and revegeta- tion, storage conditions, and type of cane the stems. The segments were transport- tion projects, but little information is wood. We conducted a study to investigate ed to Davis in an ice chest and stored in a available on how to propagate them. Cali- the effect of chemical pretreatment, cold room at 43°F (6°C) for three days. fornia wild grape, Vitis californica wood type, and rooting medium on the Before preparing and treating the cut- Benth., is one such plant that would be rooting of dormant hardwood cuttings of tings, we graded the stem wood into seven useful in the revegetation of steep slopes the California wild grape. classes according to stem diameter, stem and embankments. This vigorous, decidu- length, and type of wood (table 1). Al- ous, woody vine, which grows along though this grouping is artificial, these streams throughout the Coast Ranges, Rooting study categories correlated well with the posi- Central Valley, and Sierra Nevada foot- We collected propagation material in tion of wood on the original canes. Thin- hills, can cover large areas in a short mid-March 1985 from wild vines growing nest wood (grade A) would be associated time. Flowers produced in May and June, along the northern shore of Folsom Lake with the terminal part of the canes, thick- although not showy, are very fragrant, near Newcastle, California. Dormant est wood (grade G) with the older wood and the leaves, which resemble a typical canes of one- to two-year-old wood (6 to 10 closer to the base of the cane. We pre- grape leaf, offer a pleasing spectrum of yards long) taken from several plants pared the cuttings by making a fresh colors in the fall from lemon-yellow to were cut into stem segments 4 to 10 transverse cut above the uppermost node orange-pink and maroon. The vine lends inches long with two to four nodes per and a slant cut below the bottommost itself to training on an arbor, providing segment. Although no buds were expand- node. shade in the summer. Although relatively drought tolerant, the California wild grape benefits from moderate watering. A great deal of information exists on TABLE 1. Characteristics of wood grades used for preparing cuttings of the California wild grape the vegetative propagation of other grape Mean stem Mean stem species, but none is available on the Cali- Wood Bark Nodes/ segment segment fornia wild grape. Hardwood cuttings of grade type stem segment diam. length the European grape, Vitis vinifera, read- number mm cm ily form adventitious roots. Cuttings from A Smooth 2-4 4 12 0 Smooth 2-3 5 13 some American grape species and their C Pubescent 2-3 6 14 hybrids, however, often require special D Shredding 2-3 7 15 treatment to induce rooting. E Shredding 2 8 17 Other researchers have found that F Shredding 2 9 19 rooting of hardwood grape cuttings is in- G Shredding 2 10 21 CALIFORNIA AGRICULTURE, MAY-JUNE 1986 9 Treatments included two soil media rooting media in wooden flats. The flats ages. All wood grades except G had sub- and four pretreatment solutions. The two were misted with deionzed water (2% sec- stantially better rooting percentages media were peat:vermiculite (1:l by vol- onds every 2% minutes, dawn to dusk) in after the additional 33 days. ume) and very coarse sand. We used man- a mist bench with bottom heat of 77°F The rooting percentage after 57 days ganese sulfate (MnSO,) as one of the pre- (25°C). Greenhouse temperatures were appeared to be slightly better on the me- treatment solutions, because research in 75°F (24°C) (day) and 64°F (18°C) (night). dium grade woods (C, D, E, F), indicating the past had shown that it increased the On three dates, we removed cuttings a small gradient in rooting ability depend- rooting of several grape varieties. We and evaluated them for rooting percent- ing on the location between vine base and also tested two forms of the auxin IBA - age and quality of the root system. In apex from which cutting material was the acid and the potassium salt (K-IBA). judging quality, we considered both the collected. Auxin is the class of plant hormones most number and length of roots produced. Us- Based on the overall rating at all sam- often associated with increased rooting of ing a numerical value for each quality pling times, grade C wood is the best cuttings. A number of researchers have rating (best=3, good=2, fair=l) and the source for cutting material. Cuttings pre- investigated the effect of synthetic auxins number of cuttings in each category, we treated with deionized water for 24 hours on the rooting of grape varieties with calculated a general quality rating. Multi- had similar rooting percentages and over- variable results; some varieties have re- plying this value by the rooting percent- all ratings to those treated with manga- sponded favorably and others not at all. age yielded an overall cutting rating. Cut- nese sulfate. The four treatment solutions with the tings that had rooted were not returned to K-IBA was no better or worse as a peat:vermiculite medium were 10 mM the flats. chemical pretreatment for wild grape manganese sulfate, 0.8 mM indole-3-b~- than manganese sulfate or water. A 50 tyric acid (potassium salt, K-IBA), 1 mM Results percent ethanol solution of IBA was clear- indole-3-butyric acid (IBA), and deionized Our results indicate that California ly phytotoxic, killing all cuttings within 24 water. Cuttings rooted in sand were treat- wild grape is easy to propagate. Quality days of treatment. ed with 10 mM manganese sulfate. The root systems and high rooting percent- The rooting medium significantly af- solvent for all chemicals was deionized ages can be achieved with little effort. fected rooting percentages and the type of water, except for the IBA, which was dis- Of the cuttings treated with manga- root system produced (general rating). All solved in 50 percent ethanol. nese sulfate and rooted for 24 days in cuttings (grade C wood) in coarse sand After soaking the basal 2 inches of the peat:vermiculite, grades A, C, and G had rooted in 24 days, but only 60 percent of cuttings in the treatment solutions for 24 the highest rooting percentages (fig. 1). those in peat:vermiculite had rooted by hours, we rinsed them in deionized water, After an additional 33 days of rooting, this time (fig. 2). Although rooting was then inserted the basal 2% inches into the grades C and D gave the highest percent- faster in sand, the roots produced were finer and less numerous than those in peat:vermiculite. We obtained similar rooting results for the other wood grades evaluated. Therefore, if propagation bench space is not limited, a better root 100 100 system would be obtained by using peat: r vermiculite and allowing cuttings to root for at least 57 days. Conclusions Based on these results, we can make several recommendations for the vegeta- tive propagation of California wild grape: Cuttings should be collected in late winter or early spring (March, April) to avoid problems with bud dormancy. Ma- B terial collected for our experiments broke buds within days of being placed in the mist beds. It has been shown that, for sev- eral grape varieties, the time of season at which cuttings are made does not affect root formation but does affect bud break. Almost all types of vine wood will yield fairly good quality root systems and high rooting percentages. Chemical pretreatment does not ap- ABCDEFG Peat/vermiculite Sand pear to be required for good rooting when Wood grade Rooting medium cuttings are collected in late winter. 24 days 24days The rooting medium influences the 39 days 39 days type of root system and speed at which it 057 days 057 days is produced. Choice of rooting medium should be based on specific needs. James A. Robbins is Post-Graduate Researcher and David W.Burger is Assistant Professor, Department Fig. 1. Medium-gradewood had the highest Fig. 2. Rooting medium significantly affect- of Environmental Horticulture, University of Cali- fornia, Davis. This research was supported by a rooting percentages (A) and best overall ed rooting percentages (A) and type of root -erant for environmental research from The Pacific rating (B) after 57 days. system produced(overall rating, B) . Gas and Electric Company 10 CALIFORNIA AGRICULTURE, MAY-JUNE 1986 .
Recommended publications
  • A Note on Host Diversity of Criconemaspp
    280 Pantnagar Journal of Research [Vol. 17(3), September-December, 2019] Short Communication A note on host diversity of Criconema spp. Y.S. RATHORE ICAR- Indian Institute of Pulses Research, Kanpur- 208 024 (U.P.) Key words: Criconema, host diversity, host range, Nematode Nematode species of the genus Criconema (Tylenchida: showed preference over monocots. Superrosids and Criconemitidae) are widely distributed and parasitize Superasterids were represented by a few host plants only. many plant species from very primitive orders to However, Magnoliids and Gymnosperms substantially advanced ones. They are migratory ectoparasites and feed contributed in the host range of this nematode species. on root tips or along more mature roots. Reports like Though Rosids revealed greater preference over Asterids, Rathore and Ali (2014) and Rathore (2017) reveal that the percent host families and orders were similar in number most nematode species prefer feeding on plants of certain as reflected by similar SAI values. The SAI value was taxonomic group (s). In the present study an attempt has slightly higher for monocots that indicate stronger affinity. been made to precisely trace the host plant affinity of The same was higher for gymnosperms (0.467) in twenty-five Criconema species feeding on diverse plant comparison to Magnolids (0.413) (Table 1). species. Host species of various Criconema species Perusal of taxonomic position of host species in Table 2 reported by Nemaplex (2018) and others in literature were revealed that 68 % of Criconema spp. were monophagous aligned with families and orders following the modern and strictly fed on one host species. Of these, 20 % from system of classification, i.e., APG IV system (2016).
    [Show full text]
  • Qty Size Name 9 1G Abies Bracteata 5 1G Acer Circinatum 4 5G Acer
    REGIONAL PARKS BOTANIC GARDEN, TILDEN REGIONAL PARK, BERKELEY, CALIFORNIA Celebrating 77 years of growing California native plants: 1940-2017 **FIRST PRELIMINARY**PLANT SALE LIST **FIRST PRELIMINARY** First Preliminary Plant Sale List 9/29/2017 visit: www.nativeplants.org for the most up to date plant list, updates are posted until 10/6 FALL PLANT SALE OF CALIFORNIA NATIVE PLANTS SATURDAY, October 7, 2017 PUBLIC SALE: 10:00 AM TO 3:00 PM MEMBERS ONLY SALE: 9:00 AM TO 10:00 AM MEMBERSHIPS ARE AVAILABLE AT THE ENTRY TO THE SALE AT 8:30 AM Qty Size Name 9 1G Abies bracteata 5 1G Acer circinatum 4 5G Acer circinatum 7 4" Achillea millefolium 6 1G Achillea millefolium 'Island Pink' 15 4" Achillea millefolium 'Island Pink' 6 1G Actea rubra f. neglecta (white fruits) 15 1G Adiantum aleuticum 30 4" Adiantum capillus-veneris 15 4" Adiantum x tracyi (A. jordanii x A. aleuticum) 5 1G Alnus incana var. tenuifolia 1 1G Alnus rhombifolia 1 1G Ambrosia pumila 13 4" Ambrosia pumila 7 1G Anemopsis californica 6 1G Angelica hendersonii 1 1G Angelica tomentosa 6 1G Apocynum cannabinum 10 1G Aquilegia eximia 11 1G Aquilegia eximia 10 1G Aquilegia formosa 6 1G Aquilegia formosa 1 1G Arctostaphylos andersonii 3 1G Arctostaphylos auriculata 5 1G Arctostaphylos bakeri 10 1G Arctostaphylos bakeri 'Louis Edmunds' 5 1G Arctostaphylos catalinae 1 1G Arctostaphylos columbiana x A. uva-ursi 10 1G Arctostaphylos confertiflora 3 1G Arctostaphylos crustacea subsp. subcordata 3 1G Arctostaphylos cruzensis 1 1G Arctostaphylos densiflora 'James West' 10 1G Arctostaphylos edmundsii 'Big Sur' 2 1G Arctostaphylos edmundsii 'Big Sur' 22 1G Arctostaphylos edmundsii var.
    [Show full text]
  • Plant List for Lawn Removal
    VERY LOW WATER USE PLANTS Trees * Aesculus californica California buckeye * Cercis occidentalis western redbud * Fremontodendron spp. flannel bush * Pinus abiniana foothill pine * Quercus agrifolia coast live oak * Quercus wislizeni interior live oak Shrubs * Adenostoma fasciciulatum chamise * Arctostaphylos spp. manzanita * Artemesia californica California sagebrush * Ceanothus spp wild lilac * Cercocarpus betuloides mountain mahogany * Amelanchier alnifolia service berry * Dendromecon spp. bush poppy * Heteromeles arbutifolia toyon * Mahonia nevinii Nevin mahonia Perennials * Artemesia tridentata big sagebrush Ballota pseudodictamnus Grecian horehouond * Monardella villosa coyote mint * Nasella needlegrass Penstemon centranthifolius "Scarlet * scarlet bugler penstemon Bugler" * Romneay coulteri Matilija poppy * Salvia apiana white sage * Sisyrinchium bellum blue-eyed grass * Trichostema lanatum woolly blue curls Edibles Olea europaea olive Opunita spp. prickly pear/cholla Cactus and Succulents Cephalocereus spp. old man cactus Echinocactus barrel cactus Graptopetalum spp graptopetalum Bunch Grasses * Bouteloua curtipendula sideoats gramma * Festuca idahoensis Idaho fescue * Leymus condensatus 'Canyon Prince' giant wild rye Bulbs Amaryllis belladona naked lady * Brodiaea spp. brodiaea Colchicum agrippium autumn crocus Muscari macrocarpum grape hyacinth Narcissus spp. daffodil Scilla hughii bluebell Scilla peruviana Peruvian lily Annuals Dimorphotheca spp. African daisy * Eschscholzia californica California poppy Mirabilis jalapa four
    [Show full text]
  • Vascular Plants of Santa Cruz County, California
    ANNOTATED CHECKLIST of the VASCULAR PLANTS of SANTA CRUZ COUNTY, CALIFORNIA SECOND EDITION Dylan Neubauer Artwork by Tim Hyland & Maps by Ben Pease CALIFORNIA NATIVE PLANT SOCIETY, SANTA CRUZ COUNTY CHAPTER Copyright © 2013 by Dylan Neubauer All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced without written permission from the author. Design & Production by Dylan Neubauer Artwork by Tim Hyland Maps by Ben Pease, Pease Press Cartography (peasepress.com) Cover photos (Eschscholzia californica & Big Willow Gulch, Swanton) by Dylan Neubauer California Native Plant Society Santa Cruz County Chapter P.O. Box 1622 Santa Cruz, CA 95061 To order, please go to www.cruzcps.org For other correspondence, write to Dylan Neubauer [email protected] ISBN: 978-0-615-85493-9 Printed on recycled paper by Community Printers, Santa Cruz, CA For Tim Forsell, who appreciates the tiny ones ... Nobody sees a flower, really— it is so small— we haven’t time, and to see takes time, like to have a friend takes time. —GEORGIA O’KEEFFE CONTENTS ~ u Acknowledgments / 1 u Santa Cruz County Map / 2–3 u Introduction / 4 u Checklist Conventions / 8 u Floristic Regions Map / 12 u Checklist Format, Checklist Symbols, & Region Codes / 13 u Checklist Lycophytes / 14 Ferns / 14 Gymnosperms / 15 Nymphaeales / 16 Magnoliids / 16 Ceratophyllales / 16 Eudicots / 16 Monocots / 61 u Appendices 1. Listed Taxa / 76 2. Endemic Taxa / 78 3. Taxa Extirpated in County / 79 4. Taxa Not Currently Recognized / 80 5. Undescribed Taxa / 82 6. Most Invasive Non-native Taxa / 83 7. Rejected Taxa / 84 8. Notes / 86 u References / 152 u Index to Families & Genera / 154 u Floristic Regions Map with USGS Quad Overlay / 166 “True science teaches, above all, to doubt and be ignorant.” —MIGUEL DE UNAMUNO 1 ~ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ~ ANY THANKS TO THE GENEROUS DONORS without whom this publication would not M have been possible—and to the numerous individuals, organizations, insti- tutions, and agencies that so willingly gave of their time and expertise.
    [Show full text]
  • California Wetlands
    VOL. 46, NO.2 FREMONTIA JOURNAL OF THE CALIFORNIA NATIVE PLANT SOCIETY California Wetlands 1 California Native Plant Society CNPS, 2707 K Street, Suite 1; Sacramento, CA 95816-5130 Phone: (916) 447-2677 • Fax: (916) 447-2727 FREMONTIA www.cnps.org • [email protected] VOL. 46, NO. 2, November 2018 Memberships Copyright © 2018 Members receive many benefits, including a subscription toFremontia California Native Plant Society and the CNPS Bulletin. Look for more on inside back cover. ISSN 0092-1793 (print) Mariposa Lily.............................$1,500 Family..............................................$75 ISSN 2572-6870 (online) Benefactor....................................$600 International or library...................$75 Patron............................................$300 Individual................................$45 Gordon Leppig, Editor Plant lover.....................................$100 Student/retired..........................$25 Michael Kauffmann, Editor & Designer Corporate/Organizational 10+ Employees.........................$2,500 4-6 Employees..............................$500 7-10 Employees.........................$1,000 1-3 Employees............................$150 Staff & Contractors Dan Gluesenkamp: Executive Director Elizabeth Kubey: Outreach Coordinator Our mission is to conserve California’s Alfredo Arredondo: Legislative Analyst Sydney Magner: Asst. Vegetation Ecologist native plants and their natural habitats, Christopher Brown: Membership & Sales David Magney: Rare Plant Program Manager and increase understanding,
    [Show full text]
  • Hybridization of Cultivated Vitis Vinifera with Wild V. 
    Hybridization of cultivated Vitis vinifera with wild V. californica and V. girdiana in California Gerald S. Dangl1, Mary Lou Mendum2, Judy Yang1, M. Andrew Walker3 & John E. Preece4 1Foundation Plant Services, University of California Davis, One Shields Ave., Davis, California 95616 2Department of Plant Sciences, University of California Davis, One Shields Ave., Davis, California 95616 3Department of Viticulture and Enology, University of California Davis, One Shields Ave., Davis, California 95616 4National Clonal Germplasm Repository, USDA-ARS, University of California Davis, One Shields Ave, Davis, California 95616 Keywords Abstract California wild grape, domesticated plan introduction, genetic diversity, mixed-species Hybridization of introduced domesticates and closely related natives is well ancestry, natural hybrids, plant conservation documented in annual crops. The widespread introduction of the domesticated genetics. grapevine, Vitis vinifera, into California where it overlaps with two native con- generics, with which it is interfertile, provides opportunity to investigate Correspondence hybridization between woody perennials. Although geographically widespread, Gerald S. Dangl, Foundation Plant Services, the introduction over the past two centuries has been limited to a few elite clo- University of California Davis, One Shields nal cultivars, providing a unique opportunity to study the effects of hybridiza- Ave., Davis, CA 95616. Tel: (530) 752-7540; tion on the native species. The amount of hybridization with V. vinifera and Fax: (530) 752-2132; the genetic diversity of wild-growing Vitis californica and Vitis girdiana were E-mail: [email protected] examined using nineteen microsatellite markers. STRUCTURE analysis was used to define hybrid and introgressed individuals and to analyze genetic struc- Funding Information ture of the native species.
    [Show full text]
  • Nr 222 Native Tree, Shrub, & Herbaceous Plant
    NR 222 NATIVE TREE, SHRUB, & HERBACEOUS PLANT IDENTIFICATION BY RONALD L. ALVES FALL 2014 NR 222 by Ronald L. Alves Note to Students NOTE TO STUDENTS: THIS DOCUMENT IS INCOMPLETE WITH OMISSIONS, ERRORS, AND OTHER ITEMS OF INCOMPETANCY. AS YOU MAKE USE OF IT NOTE THESE TRANSGRESSIONS SO THAT THEY MAY BE CORRECTED AND YOU WILL RECEIVE A CLEAN COPY BY THE END OF TIME OR THE SEMESTER, WHICHEVER COMES FIRST!! THANKING YOU FOR ANY ASSISTANCE THAT YOU MAY GIVE, RON ALVES. Introduction This manual was initially created by Harold Whaley an MJC Agriculture and Natural Resources instruction from 1964 – 1992. The manual was designed as a resource for a native tree and shrub identification course, Natural Resources 222 that was one of the required courses for all forestry and natural resource majors at the college. The course and the supporting manual were aimed almost exclusively for forestry and related majors. In addition to NR 222 being taught by professor Whaley, it has also been taught by Homer Bowen (MJC 19xx -), Marlies Boyd (MJC 199X – present), Richard Nimphius (MJC 1980 – 2006) and currently Ron Alves (MJC 1974 – 2004). Each instructor put their own particular emphasis and style on the course but it was always oriented toward forestry students until 2006. The lack of forestry majors as a result of the Agriculture Department not having a full time forestry instructor to recruit students and articulate with industry has resulted in a transformation of the NR 222 course. The clientele not only includes forestry major, but also landscape designers, environmental horticulture majors, nursery people, environmental science majors, and people interested in transforming their home and business landscapes to a more natural venue.
    [Show full text]
  • Proceedings of the 2018 Pierce's Disease Research Symposium
    Proceedings of the 2018 Pierce’s Disease Research Symposium - December 2018 - Compiled by: Pierce’s Disease Control Program California Department of Food and Agriculture Sacramento, CA 95814 Editor: Thomas Esser, CDFA Cover Design: Sean Veling, CDFA Cover Photograph: Ken Freeze, Brown-Miller Communication Printer: California Office of State Publishing, Sacramento, California Cite as: Proceedings of the 2018 Pierce’s Disease Research Symposium. California Department of Food and Agriculture, Sacramento, CA. Available on the Internet at: https://www.cdfa.ca.gov/pdcp/Research.html Acknowledgements: Many thanks to the scientists and cooperators conducting research on Pierce’s disease and other pests and diseases of winegrapes for submitting reports for inclusion in this document. Note to Readers: The reports in this document have not been peer reviewed. TABLE OF CONTENTS Section 1: Xylella fastidiosa and Pierce’s Disease REPORTS • The Epidemiology of Novel Pdr1 Resistant Grapevines: Epidemic and Vector Movement Models to Support Integrated Disease Management Rodrigo Almeida. ...................................................................................................................................3 • Evaluating Potential Shifts in Pierce's Disease Epidemiology Rodrigo Almeida ..................................................................................................................................11 • Addressing Knowledge Gaps in Pierce’s Disease Epidemiology: Underappreciated Vectors, Genotypes, and Patterns of Spread Rodrigo
    [Show full text]
  • Barbata Plant List
    Stephen Barbara and Joyce Kirstein's Selected Plant List April 2014 OAK WOODLAND Arbutus unedo. strawberry tree Callistemon viminalis. weeping bottlebrush Calocedrus decyrrens. incense cedar * Carpenteria californica. bush anemone * Cedrus deodara. deodar cedar Cercis occidentalis. western redbud * Garrya elliptica. coast silk tassel * Helleborus argutifolius. corsican hellebore Helleborus sternii. lenten rose hellebore Heteromeles arbutifolia. toyon * Heuchera micrantha. island alum root * Heuchera sanguinea. coral bells Iridaceae innominata. Del Norte County iris * Iris douglasiani. douglas iris * Iris germanica. bearded iris (Ruth Bancroft heirlooms) Lavatera assurgentiflora. island tree mallow * Omphalodes cappadocica. creeping forget-me-not Phoenix reclinata. Senegal date palm Pinus halapensis. Allepo pine Quercus agrifolia. coast live oak * Quercus lobata. valley oak * Quercus wislizenii. interior live oak * Rhamnus alaternus. Italian buckthorn Rhamnus californica. coffeeberry * Robinia pseudoacacia. black locust tree Schinus molle. California pepper tree Schinus terebinthifolius. Chinese pepper tree Tamarix sp. tamarisk Thuja plicata. western red cedar * Vitex agnus-castus. chaste tree Vitis californica. California wild grape * Washingtonia robusta. Mexican fan palm SHRUBLAND Arctostaphylos ‘emerald carpet’. manzanita * Arctostaphylos ‘John Dourley’ manzanita * Arctostaphylos auriculata. Mt. Diablo manzanita * Arctostaphylos bakeri. manzanita * Arctostaphylos densiflora. ‘Austin Griffiths’ manzanita * Arctostaphylos densiflora.’Howard
    [Show full text]
  • Native Plant Garden Tour
    10th ANNIVERSARY THEODORE PAYNE NATIVE PLANT GARDEN TOUR PLANT LIST GARDEN 6 in la CAÑada Flintridge Botanical Name Common Name Acalypha californica California Copperleaf Acer macrophylla Bigleaf Maple Acmispon (Lotus) grandiflorus Chaparral Lotus Adenostoma fasciculatum ‘Black Diamond’ Black Diamond Chamise Adiantum capillus-veneris Southern Maidenhair Fern Aesculus californica California Buckeye Agave shawii Shaw’s Agave Aquilegia formosa Western Columbine Arbutus menziesii Madrone Arctostaphylos ‘Carmel Sur’ Carmel Sur Manzanita Arctostaphylos ‘Dr. Hurd’ Dr. Hurd Manzanita Arctostaphylos ‘Emerald Carpet’ Emerald Carpet Manzanita Arctostaphylos ‘Greensphere’ Greensphere Manzanita Arctostaphylos ‘Howard McMinn’ Howard McMinn Manzanita Arctostaphylos ‘Lester Rowntree’ Lester Rowntree Manzanita Arctostaphylos ‘Sentinel’ Sentinel Manzanita Arctostaphylos ‘Sunset’ Sunset Manzanita Arctostaphylos auriculata ‘Diablo Blush’ Diablo Blush Manzanita Arctostaphylos auriculata ‘Knobcone Point’ Knobcone Point Manzanita Arctostaphylos rudis Sand Mesa or Shagbark Manzanita Aristida purpurea Purple Three Awn Artemisia californica ‘Canyon Grey’ Canyon Grey California Sagebrush Baccharis pilularis Coyote Brush Berberis (Mahonia) aquifolium ‘Golden Abundance’ Golden Abundance Oregon Grape Berberis (Mahonia) aquifolium var. repens Creeping Oregon Grape, Creeping Barberry Berberis (Mahonia) pinnata ‘Skylark’ Skylark California Barberry Bouteloua gracilis Blue Grama Grass Carex praegracilis Field Sedge Carpenteria californica Bush Anenome Ceanothus ‘Dark
    [Show full text]
  • Wine in the Rogue Valley: Peter Britt and the Beginnings
    Wine in the Bogue Valley: Peter Britt and the Beginnings In his authoritative A History of Wine in America: From the Beginnings to Prohibition, author Thomas Pinney states: In Oregon and Washington, the history of winegrowing is practically a reversal of what happened in most other states. Usually men tried to grow grapes in regions where they would not succeed; In Oregon, especially, but in Washington as well, Vitis Vinifera m\\ grow more or less unaided, but there were few who made the effort to grow it. Thus, though the possibility was always there and though it was pretty clearly recognized in theory, no significant commercial winemaking developed in the Pacific Northwest until the second half of the twentieth century. The story of the region before that time is an irregular chronicle of isolated experiment.1 In this work Pinney goes on to devote only one paragraph to the history of winegrowing in southern Oregon and writes nothing at all about the Rogue Valley. We will see however that one of the "isolated experiments" was being carried out by Peter Britt of Jacksonville who demonstrated that Vitis Vinifera could grow successfully there, and in so doing he gave impetus to a small but significant nineteenth and early twentieth century industry which anticipated the development of modern winegrowing in the area. The botanical genus Vitis includes the true grapes Euvitis and the Muscadiniae ? Both these subgenera include species of winegrapes. Vitis Vinifera, the old world species is native to Asia Minor south of the Caucasus and the Caspian Sea in the vicinity of historic Armenia and from there it has been disseminated throughout the world in the temperate zones.
    [Show full text]
  • County of Riverside Friendly Plant List
    ATTACHMENT A COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE CALIFORNIA FRIENDLY PLANT LIST PLANT LIST KEY WUCOLS III (Water Use Classification of Landscape Species) WUCOLS Region Sunset Zones 1 2,3,14,15,16,17 2 8,9 3 22,23,24 4 18,19,20,21 511 613 WUCOLS III Water Usage/ Average Plant Factor Key H-High (0.8) M-Medium (0.5) L-Low (.2) VL-Very Low (0.1) * Water use for this plant material was not listed in WUCOLS III, but assumed in comparison to plants of similar species ** Zones for this plant material were not listed in Sunset, but assumed in comparison to plants of similar species *** Zones based on USDA zones ‡ The California Friendly Plant List is provided to serve as a general guide for plant material. Riverside County has multiple Sunset Zones as well as microclimates within those zones which can affect plant viability and mature size. As such, plants and use categories listed herein are not exhaustive, nor do they constitute automatic approval; all proposed plant material is subject to review by the County. In some cases where a broad genus or species is called out within the list, there may be multiple species or cultivars that may (or may not) be appropriate. The specific water needs and sizes of cultivars should be verified by the designer. Site specific conditions should be taken into consideration in determining appropriate plant material. This includes, but is not limited to, verifying soil conditions affecting erosion, site specific and Fire Department requirements or restrictions affecting plans for fuel modifications zones, and site specific conditions near MSHCP areas.
    [Show full text]