DOCSLIB.ORG

Draft Environmental Impact Statement for the Siting, Construction, and Operation of New Production Reactor Capacity

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Draft Environmental Impact Statement for the Siting, Construction, and Operation of New Production Reactor Capacity DOE/EIS-01440 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Office of New Production Reactors Washington, DC 20585 Draft Environmental Impact Statement for the Siting, Construction, and Operation of New Production Reactor Capacity Volume 3: Sections 7-12 Appendices A·C April 1991 DOCUMENT CONTENTS VOLUME1 Summary VOLUME 2 Foreword Section 1 Introduction Section 2 Analysis of Programmatic Alternatives Section 3 Project Alternatives, Including No Action Section 4 Affected Environment of Alternative Sites Section 5 Environmental Consequences Section 6 Environmental Regulations and Permit Requirements VOLUME 3 Section 7 References Section 8 List of Preparers Section 9 List of Recipients Section 10 Acronyms, Abbreviations, and Units of Measure Section 11 Glossary Section 12 Index Appendix A Heavy-Water Reactor Technology Appendix B Light-Water Reactor Technology Appendix C Modular High-Temperature Gas-Cooled Reactor Technology VOLUME 4 Appendix D Geologic Resources Appendix E Air Resources and Noise Appendix F Water Resources Appendix G Biotic Resources Appendix H · Radiological Impacts of Normal Operations Appendix I Radiological Impacts of Postulated Nonsevere Accidents Appendix J Radiological Impacts of Postulated Severe Accidents Appendix K Impacts from Transportation of Radioactive Materials Appendix L Methodology for Nonradioactive Hazardous Material Accident Assessment Appendix M Waste Management Appendix N Socioeconomics Appendix 0 Decontamination and Decommissioning Appendix P Waste Stream Composition Data Appendix Q Cultural Resources Appendix R Supplemental Evaluation of Environmental Impacts for a Six-Module 450-MWt MHTGR Production Complex V3 - iii CONTENTS -VOLUME 3 DOCUMENT CONTENTS . V3 - iii CONTENTS - VOLUME 3 . V3 - v FIGURES - VOLUME 3 ................................................V3 - xiii TABLES - VOLUME 3 .................................................V3 - xvi 7 REFERENCES . 7-1 8 LIST OF PREPARERS . 8-1 9 LIST OF RE CIPIENTS . 9-1 10 ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS. 10-1 11 GLC>SSAR Y . 11-1 12 INDEX . 12-1 APPENDIX A: HEAVY-WA TER REA CTOR TE CHNOLOGY . A-1 A.1 Overview . A-3 A.1.1 Introduction . A-3 A.1.2 Safety and Safety Assurance . A-4 A.1.2.1 New Facilities . A-4 A.1.2.2 Existing Facilities . A-4 A.1.2.3 Specific Requirements Met by the HWR . A-5 A.1.3 Heavy-Water Reactor Technology . A-5 A.1.3.1 Reactor . A-5 A.1.3.2 Fuel and Tritium-Target Cycle . A-5 A.1.3.3 Fuel/Plutonium-Target Cycle . A-6 A.1.3.4 Waste Management . A-9 A.2 Heavy-Water Reactor Technology at SRS . A-10 A.2.1 Introduction . A-10 A.2.1.1 New and Existing Facilities Required for the NP R . A-10 A.2.1.2 Location . A-10 A.2.1.3 Existing Facilities, Utilities, and On-site Transportation . A-10 A.2.2 Heavy-Water Reactor Facility . A-12 A.2.2.1 Plant Structures . A-12 A.2.2.2 Nu clear Reactor Systems . A-14 A.2.2.3 Engineered Safety Features . A-14 A.2.2.4 Reactor Containment . A-14 A.2.2.5 Fuel and Target Handling . A-15 A.2.2.6 Heavy-Water Processing . A-15 A.2.2.7 Power Conversion System . A-16 V3 -v CONTENTS - VOLUME 3 (Confd) A.2.2.8 Utilities . A-16 A.2.2.9 Heat Dissipation Systems . A-17 A.2.2.10 Waste Management . A-22 A.2.3 Fuel and Tritium-Target Fabrication . A-26 A.2.3.1 Facility Description . A-26 A.2.3.2 Fuel and Target Description . A-26 A.2.3.3 Process Description . A- 26 A.2.3.4 Process Effluents and Wastes . A-26 A.2.4 Fuel/Plutonium-239 Target Fabrication . A- 27 A.2.4.1 Facility Description . A-27 A.2.4.2 Fuel/ Target Description . A-28 A.2.4.3 Process Description . A-28 A.2.4.4 Process Effluents and Wastes . A-29 A.2.5 Spent Fuel Processing . A-29 A.2.5.1 Facility Description . A-30 A.2.5.2 Process Description . A-30 A.2.5.3 Process Effluents and Wastes . A-3 1 A.2.6 Tritium-Target Processing . A-3 1 A.2.6.1 Facility Description . A-3 1 A.2.6.2 Process Description . A-3 2 A.2.6.3 Process Effluents and Wastes . A-3 2 A.2.7 Fuel/Plutonium-Target Processing . A-33 A.2.7.1 Facility Description . A-33 A.2.7.2 Process Description . A-33 A.2.7.3 Process Effluents and Wastes . A-33 A.2.8 Plant Operation . A-3 4 A.2.9 Sitewide Waste Management . A-3 4 A.2.9.1 Was.te Management Facilities . A-37 A.2.9.2 Liquid Waste Processing . A-38 A.2.9.3 Solid Waste Processing . A-3 9 A.3 Heavy-Water Reactor Technology at Hanford . A-40 A.3.1 Introduction . A-40 A.3.1.1 New and Existing Facilities Required for the NP R . A-40 A.3.1.2 Location . A- 41 A.3.1.3 Existing Facilities, Utilities, and On-site Transportation . A-4 1 A.3.2 Heavy-Water Reactor Facility . A-4 1 A.3.2.l Plant Structures . A-4 1 A.3.2.2 Heat Dissipation Systems . A-43 A.3.2.3 Electric System . A-45 A.3.3 Fuel and Tritium-Target Fabrication . A-45 A.3.3.1 Facility Description . A-45 A.3.3. 2 Fuel and Target Description . A-47 A.3.3.3 Process Description . A-47 A.3.3.4 Process Effluents and Wastes . A-47 A.3.4 Fuel/Plutonium-Target Fabrication . A-47 A.3.4.1 Facility Description . A- 48 A.3.4.2 Fuel/ Target Description . A-48 A.3.4.3 Process Description . A-48 V3 - vi CONTENTS - VOLUME 3 (Confd) A.3.4.4 Process Effluents and Wastes . A-48 A.3.5 Spent Fuel Processing . A-48 A.3.5.l Facility Description . A-48 A.3.5.2 Process Description . A-50 A.3.5.3 Process Effluents and Wastes . A-53 A.3.6 Tritium-Target Processing . A-55 A.3.6.1 Facility Description . A-55 A.3.6. 2 Process Description . A-55 A.3.6.3 Process Effluents and Wastes . A-55 A.3.7 Fuel/Plutonium-Target Processing . A-56 A.3.7. 1 Facility Description . A- 56 A.3.7. 2 Process Description . A-56 A.3.7.3 Process Effluentsand Wastes . ..
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Appendix File Anes 1988‐1992 Merged Senate File
    Version 03 Codebook ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ CODEBOOK APPENDIX FILE ANES 1988‐1992 MERGED SENATE FILE USER NOTE: Much of his file has been converted to electronic format via OCR scanning. As a result, the user is advised that some errors in character recognition may have resulted within the text. MASTER CODES: The following master codes follow in this order: PARTY‐CANDIDATE MASTER CODE CAMPAIGN ISSUES MASTER CODES CONGRESSIONAL LEADERSHIP CODE ELECTIVE OFFICE CODE RELIGIOUS PREFERENCE MASTER CODE SENATOR NAMES CODES CAMPAIGN MANAGERS AND POLLSTERS CAMPAIGN CONTENT CODES HOUSE CANDIDATES CANDIDATE CODES >> VII. MASTER CODES ‐ Survey Variables >> VII.A. Party/Candidate ('Likes/Dislikes') ? PARTY‐CANDIDATE MASTER CODE PARTY ONLY ‐‐ PEOPLE WITHIN PARTY 0001 Johnson 0002 Kennedy, John; JFK 0003 Kennedy, Robert; RFK 0004 Kennedy, Edward; "Ted" 0005 Kennedy, NA which 0006 Truman 0007 Roosevelt; "FDR" 0008 McGovern 0009 Carter 0010 Mondale 0011 McCarthy, Eugene 0012 Humphrey 0013 Muskie 0014 Dukakis, Michael 0015 Wallace 0016 Jackson, Jesse 0017 Clinton, Bill 0031 Eisenhower; Ike 0032 Nixon 0034 Rockefeller 0035 Reagan 0036 Ford 0037 Bush 0038 Connally 0039 Kissinger 0040 McCarthy, Joseph 0041 Buchanan, Pat 0051 Other national party figures (Senators, Congressman, etc.) 0052 Local party figures (city, state, etc.) 0053 Good/Young/Experienced leaders; like whole ticket 0054 Bad/Old/Inexperienced leaders; dislike whole ticket 0055 Reference to vice‐presidential candidate ? Make 0097 Other people within party reasons Card PARTY ONLY ‐‐ PARTY CHARACTERISTICS 0101 Traditional Democratic voter: always been a Democrat; just a Democrat; never been a Republican; just couldn't vote Republican 0102 Traditional Republican voter: always been a Republican; just a Republican; never been a Democrat; just couldn't vote Democratic 0111 Positive, personal, affective terms applied to party‐‐good/nice people; patriotic; etc.
    [Show full text]
  • Nuclear Power Plant Organization and Staffing for Lessons Learned
    IAEA-TECDOC-1052 minium XA9848504 Nuclear power plant organization staffingand for improved performance: lessons learned INTERNATIONAL ATOMIC ENERGY AGENCY fl/U Lr\^ The originating Section of this publication in the IAEA was: Nuclear Power Engineering Section International Atomic Energy Agency Wagramer Strasse5 P.O. Box 100 A-1400 Vienna, Austria NUCLEAR POWER PLANT ORGANIZATION AND STAFFING FOR IMPROVED PERFORMANCE: LESSONS LEARNED IAEA, VIENNA, 1998 IAEA-TECDOC-1052 ISSN 1011-4289 ©IAEA, 1998 Printe IAEe th AustriAn y i d b a November 1998 The IAEA does not normally maintain stocks of reports in this series. However, microfiche copies of these reports can be obtained from INIS Clearinghouse International Atomic Energy Agency Wagramerstrasse5 0 10 P.Ox Bo . A-1400 Vienna, Austria Orders shoul accompaniee db prepaymeny db f Austriao t n Schillings 100, fore for e chequa th f mth IAEmf o n i n o i r eAo microfiche service coupons which may be ordered separately from the INIS Clearinghouse. FOREWORD Experience from well operated nuclear power plants (NPPs) aroun worle dth d indicates that an organizational structure that effectively supports plant operation s i essentias n i l economically achieving high level f safet so operationa d yan l performance same th t e A .time , in many Member States, energy market e beinar s g opene o competitiont d n i s i t I . consideration of this new competitive energy market that this publication focuses on organization and staffing of NPPs to improve efficiency and effectiveness. This publication is primarily intended for senior NPP and utility managers.
    [Show full text]
  • CONVERSATIONS MATTER Why Medicare (Unlike Medicaid and the Veterans Health Administration) Cannot Negotiate Prescription Drug Prices
    Kari Gottfried POL 317: U.S. Health Policy & Politics CONVERSATIONS MATTER Why Medicare (Unlike Medicaid and the Veterans Health Administration) Cannot Negotiate Prescription Drug Prices Gottfried 1 Introduction & Background The national conversation around health care reform has been approached from many angles, but the general consensus is this: the United States is spending more on health care, and getting less in return, than any other comparable country.1 There are many reasons why this is the case, and health policy experts have been trying to get to the bottom of this problem for years. One case they make for astronomical health care costs is the rising price of prescription drugs.2 Both Democrats and Republicans have emerged as critics of this issue, placing the blame on the pharmaceutical industry and their powerful lobby.3 In a Congressional hearing last February, Senator Sherrod Brown (D-Ohio) challenged pharmaceutical executives, telling them, “We cannot continue to give Big Pharma the blank check that you have had to pay for high- priced prescription drugs.”4 Senator Cassidy (R-La.) argues that the burden should not be placed on the government to pay for these expensive drugs, since the cost eventually falls on taxpayers. He says “if the taxpayer is paying that money… it is almost as if the taxpayer has ‘stupid’ written on their face, which they should not. That is unfair.”5 However, legislators discount the role they have had in this crisis. Nearly one third of prescription drug spending is through the Medicare Part D prescription drug benefit,6 but 1 In this paper, “comparable” or “similar” countries to the United States refers to countries that are a part of the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development, or OECD countries.
    [Show full text]
  • 038 12 Conduct of Operations
    TMI-1 UFSAR CHAPTER 12 – CONDUCT OF OPERATIONS TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION TITLE 12.0 CONDUCT OF OPERATIONS 12.1 ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE 12.1.1 OFFSITE ORGANIZATION 12.1.2 OPERATING ORGANIZATION 12.1.2.1 PLANT DIVISION 12.1.2.1.1 OPERATIONS DEPARTMENT 12.1.2.1.2 MAINTENANCE DEPARTMENT 12.1.2.1.3 WORK MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT 12.1.2.1.4 RADIOLOGICAL HEALTH AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT 12.1.2.1.5 CHEMISTRY DEPARTMENT 12.1.2.2 SECURITY DEPARTMENT 12.1.2.3 SITE ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT 12.1.2.3.1 PLANT ENGINEERING SECTION 12.1.2.3.2 DESIGN ENGINEERING SECTION 12.1.2.3.3 PROGRAMS SECTION 12.1.2.4 TRAINING DEPARTMENT 12.1.2.5 BUSINESS OPERATIONS DEPARTMENT 12.1.2.6 REGULATORY ASSURANCE DEPARTMENT 12.1.2.7 MANAGER – HUMAN RESOURCES 12.1.2.8 PROJECT MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT 12.1.3 QUALIFICATION OF NUCLEAR PLANT PERSONNEL 12.1.4 SAFETY REVIEWS 12.2 TRAINING 12.2.1 TRAINING PROGRAMS 12.2.2 TECHNICAL TRAINING 12.2.2.1 MAINTENANCE TRAINING 12.2.2.2 RADIOLOGICAL CONTROLS/CHEMISTRY TRAINING PROGRAMS 12.2.3 OPERATIONS TRAINING 12.2.3.1 REPLACEMENT OPERATOR TRAINING PROGRAM (AO/CRO/SRO) 12.2.3.2 LICENSED OPERATOR REQUALIFICATION TRAINING PROGRAM (CRO/SRO) 12.2.3.3 SHIFT TECHNICAL ADVISOR (STA) TRAINING PROGRAM 12.2.3.4 AUXILIARY OPERATOR (AO) REQUALIFICATION TRAINING PROGRAM 12.2.4 TRAINING SUPPORT 12.2.4.1 GENERAL EMPLOYEE TRAINING PROGRAMS 12.2.4.2 FIRE PROTECTION TRAINING PROGRAM 12.2.4.3 EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS TRAINING PROGRAMS 12.2.4.4 NOT USED 12.2.5 ENGINEERING SUPPORT PERSONNEL (ESP)TRAINING PROGRAM 12.2.6 TRAINING RECORDS CHAPTER 12 12-i REV.
    [Show full text]
  • Off the Record
    About the Center for Public Integrity The CENTER FOR PUBLIC INTEGRITY, founded in 1989 by a group of concerned Americans, is a nonprofit, nonpartisan, tax-exempt educational organization created so that important national issues can be investigated and analyzed over a period of months without the normal time or space limitations. Since its inception, the Center has investigated and disseminated a wide array of information in more than sixty Center reports. The Center's books and studies are resources for journalists, academics, and the general public, with databases, backup files, government documents, and other information available as well. The Center is funded by foundations, individuals, revenue from the sale of publications and editorial consulting with news organizations. The Joyce Foundation and the Town Creek Foundation provided financial support for this project. The Center gratefully acknowledges the support provided by: Carnegie Corporation of New York The Florence & John Schumann Foundation The John D. & Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation The New York Community Trust This report, and the views expressed herein, do not necessarily reflect the views of the individual members of the Center for Public Integrity's Board of Directors or Advisory Board. THE CENTER FOR PUBLIC INTEGRITY 910 17th Street, N.W. Seventh Floor Washington, D.C. 20006 Telephone: (202) 466-1300 Facsimile: (202)466-1101 E-mail: [email protected] Copyright © 2000 The Center for Public Integrity All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or by any information and retrieval system, without permission in writing from The Center for Public Integrity.
    [Show full text]
  • Of Operation and Control Ion-Exchange Processes For
    TECHNICAL REPORTS SERIES No. 78 Operation and Control Of Ion-Exchange Processes for Treatment of Radioactive Wastes INTERNATIONAL ATOMIC ENERGY AGENCY,VIENNA, 1967 OPERATION AND CONTROL OF ION-EXCHANGE PROCESSES FOR TREATMENT OF RADIOACTIVE WASTES The following States are Members of the International Atomic Energy Agency: AFGHANISTAN GERMANY, FEDERAL NIGERIA ALBANIA REPUBLIC OF NORWAY ALGERIA GHANA PAKISTAN ARGENTINA GREECE PANAMA AUSTRALIA GUATEMALA PARAGUAY AUSTRIA HAITI PERU BELGIUM HOLY SEE PHILIPPINES BOLIVIA HUNGARY POLAND BRAZIL ICELAND PORTUGAL BULGARIA INDIA ROMANIA BURMA INDONESIA SAUDI ARABIA BYELORUSSIAN SOVIET IRAN SENEGAL SOCIALIST REPUBLIC IRAQ SIERRA LEONE CAMBODIA ISRAEL SINGAPORE CAMEROON ITALY SOUTH AFRICA CANADA IVORY COAST SPAIN CEYLON JAMAICA SUDAN CHILE JAPAN SWEDEN CHINA JORDAN SWITZERLAND COLOMBIA KENYA SYRIAN ARAB REPUBLIC CONGO, DEMOCRATIC KOREA, REPUBLIC OF THAILAND REPUBLIC OF KUWAIT TUNISIA COSTA RICA LEBANON TURKEY CUBA LIBERIA UKRAINIAN SOVIET SOCIALIST CYPRUS LIBYA REPUBLIC CZECHOSLOVAK SOCIALIST LUXEMBOURG UNION OF SOVIET SOCIALIST REPUBLIC MADAGASCAR REPUBLICS DENMARK MALI UNITED ARAB REPUBLIC DOMINICAN REPUBLIC MEXICO UNITED KINGDOM OF GREAT ECUADOR MONACO BRITAIN AND NORTHERN IRELAND EL SALVADOR MOROCCO UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ETHIOPIA NETHERLANDS URUGUAY FINLAND NEW ZEALAND VENEZUELA FRANCE NICARAGUA VIET-NAM GABON YUGOSLAVIA The Agency's Statute was approved on 26 October 1956 by the Conference on the Statute of the IAEA held at United Nations Headquarters, New York; it entered into force on 29 July 1957, The Headquarters of the Agency are situated in Vienna. Its principal objective is "to accelerate and enlarge the contribution of atomic energy to peace, health and prosperity throughout the world". © IAEA, 1967 Permission to reproduce or translate the information contained in this publication may be obtained by writing to the International Atomic Energy Agency, Kamtner Ring 11, A-1010 Vienna I, Austria.
    [Show full text]
  • Upgrading Water Treatment Plants
    Upgrading Water Treatment Plants E. G. Wagner and R. G. Pinheiro ISBN 0-419-26050-1 (pbk) 0-419-26040-4 Published on behalf of the WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION London and New York First published 2001 by Spon Press 11 New Fetter Lane, London EC4P 4EE Simultaneously published in the USA and Canada by Spon Press 29 West 35th Street, New York, NY 10001 Spon Press is an imprint of the Taylor & Francis Group © 2001 World Health Organization The authors alone are responsible for the views expressed in this publication. Printed and bound in Great Britain by TJ International Ltd, Padstow, Cornwall All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reprinted or reproduced or utilised in any form or by any electronic, mechanical, or other means, now known or hereafter invented, including photocopying and recording, or in any information storage or retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publishers. The publisher makes no representation, express or implied, with regard to the accuracy of the information contained in this book and cannot accept any legal responsibility or liability for any errors or omissions that may be made. Publisher's Note This book has been prepared from camera-ready copy provided by the authors. British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data A catalogue record has been requested Foreword The availability of safe water, and in particular safe drinking water, has been an area of concern to the World Health Organization for many years.
    [Show full text]
  • Reflections University Libraries Publications
    University of South Carolina Scholar Commons Reflections University Libraries Publications Spring 2009 Reflections - Spring 2009 University Libraries--University of South Carolina Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarcommons.sc.edu/reflections Part of the Library and Information Science Commons Recommended Citation University of South Carolina, "University of South Carolina Libraries - Reflections, Spring 2009". http://scholarcommons.sc.edu/ reflections/4/ This Newsletter is brought to you by the University Libraries Publications at Scholar Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Reflections by an authorized administrator of Scholar Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. S McNally Named Dean of University Libraries Thomas F. McNally was named dean of University Libraries at the University of South Carolina’s Columbia campus on March 1. N McNally had served the libraries as interim dean since July 1, 2007, and as director of Thomas Cooper Library from 1991 to 2007. During his nearly 19 years as an administrator with the libraries, McNally was instrumental in pro- viding innovative library services to the University O community, in moving the libraries into the area of cont. on page 2 Tom McNally at the Hollings Library work site I To the University community: This is my first opportunity to write to you our collections. As always, we will be presenting as dean of University Libraries. For me, it is an outstanding programs with terrific speakers. T opportunity to say “thank you.” Over the last year The months and years ahead are going to offer and one-half that I have served as interim dean, extraordinary challenges and opportunities for our you have greeted me with offers of support, encour- University Libraries.
    [Show full text]
  • Configuration Management in Nuclear Power Plants
    IAEA-TECDOC-1335 Configuration management in nuclear power plants January 2003 The originating Section of this publication in the IAEA was: Nuclear Power Engineering Section International Atomic Energy Agency Wagramer Strasse 5 P.O. Box 100 A-1400 Vienna, Austria CONFIGURATION MANAGEMENT IN NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS IAEA, VIENNA, 2003 IAEA-TECDOC-1335 ISBN 92–0–100503–2 ISSN 1011–4289 © IAEA, 2003 Printed by the IAEA in Austria January 2003 FOREWORD Configuration management (CM) is the process of identifying and documenting the characteristics of a facility’s structures, systems and components of a facility, and of ensuring that changes to these characteristics are properly developed, assessed, approved, issued, implemented, verified, recorded and incorporated into the facility documentation. The need for a CM system is a result of the long term operation of any nuclear power plant. The main challenges are caused particularly by ageing plant technology, plant modifications, the application of new safety and operational requirements, and in general by human factors arising from migration of plant personnel and possible human failures. The IAEA Incident Reporting System (IRS) shows that on average 25% of recorded events could be caused by configuration errors or deficiencies. CM processes correctly applied ensure that the construction, operation, maintenance and testing of a physical facility are in accordance with design requirements as expressed in the design documentation. An important objective of a configuration management program is to ensure that accurate information consistent with the physical and operational characteristics of the power plant is available in a timely manner for making safe, knowledgeable, and cost effective decisions with confidence.
    [Show full text]
  • Facilities Operations Manual
    U.S. Department of Justice Federal Bureau of Prisons P R O G R A M S T A T E M E N T OPI: ADM/FAC NUMBER: 4200.11 DATE: April 12, 2016 Facilities Operations Manual /s/ Approved: Thomas R. Kane Acting Director, Federal Bureau of Prisons 1. PURPOSE AND SCOPE Since the Manual’s last edition, operations have been changed and new policies developed to improve organizational efficiency. This edition incorporates individual duties of Facilities Management staff, makes changes reflecting new laws and regulations, and consolidates Bureau directives regarding physical plant maintenance and operations. a. Summary of Changes Policy Rescinded P4200.10 Facilities Operations Manual (1/24/2006) This Program Statement incorporates changes in the areas listed below: ■ Rewrite of Chapter 1, Facilities Administration and Organization ■ Rewrite of Chapter 2, Work Programming, Scheduling and Reporting ■ Rewrite of Chapter 3, Buildings and Facilities Projects ■ Rewrite of Chapter 4, Architect-Engineer Services ■ Rewrite of Chapter 5, Preventive Maintenance/Inspections ■ Rewrite, renaming, and renumbering of Chapter 6, Automated Systems and Document Control ■ Rewrite and renaming of Chapter 7, Life Safety/Fire Protection ■ Rewrite and renaming of Chapter 8, Environmental ■ Rewrite of Chapter 9, Telecommunication Systems and Electronic Equipment ■ Rewrite and renaming of Chapter 10, Vehicle Fleet ■ Rewrite of Chapter 11, Mechanical Systems and Power Plant Operations ■ Rewrite of Chapter 12, Electrical Systems ■ Rewrite of Chapter 13, Physical Plant Review Program ■ Rewrite of Chapter 14, Plumbing Systems ■ Rewrite of Chapter 15, Accessibility ■ Rewrite, renaming, and renumbering of Chapter 16, Energy/Water Conservation and Greenhouse Gas ■ Rewrite of Chapter 17, Historic Preservation b.
    [Show full text]
  • Webster. Chamberlain & Bean
    LAW OFFICES WEBSTER.CHAMBERLAIN & BEAN 1747 PENNSYLVANIAAVENUE. N.W. WASHINGTON.D.C. 20000 (202)785-0500 GEORGZ D WEBSTER lleBl-ln6.el OF COUNSU FAX: (202)835-0243 J COLEHAN BE*N CHIRLES E CHAMBERLAIN November 21, 1997 Dawn M. Odrowski, Esq. Office of General Counsel Federal Election Commission Sixth Floor 999 E Street, N.W. ...~,... Washington, D.C. 20463 ia:'-...: .. Re: MUR 3774 National Risht to Work Committee Dear Ms. Odrowski: The National Right to Work Committee recently discovered additional documents that are responsive to the requests contained in your letter of September 4, 1997. The documents have been organized in accordance with the separate numbered paragraphs in your September 4 letter and each batch of documents is accompanied by a cover sheet identifying the paragraphs of your letter to which that group of documents is responsive. Frank M. Northam Enclosures FMN/ctb cc: National Right to Work Committee BEFORE THE FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION ... _.... .... In the Matter of 1 ... -.._I_.... .. Witness Subpoena to ) MUR 3774 The National Right to) :--: ......... Work Committee ) ._.... 3.:.....i.: DOCUMENTS FROM NRWC Supplemental Submission in Response to Letter from FEC dated 9/4/97 Item 1.a. G (Ateach to FINAL copy) .- FROM: 4 HAVE ALL RECOMMENDED CMAEGES BEEN MADE? BYES 0 NO PROOFlNG: 1ST pfi! SUF. IO/(> REVISION NEEDED 2ND IP6 REVISION NEEDED -h Ir 3RD I0l/L( REVISION NEEDED Nb 4TH - REVISION NEEDED 5TH REVISION NEEDED 6TH / REVISION NEEDED FINAL COPY APPROVED? DATE: sc U.S. Senate Questions#: 1 2 a 4 B 6 7 8 9 Dirtrlat 2 Questions# 123456789 Floyd Spence-R YYYYYYY-Y ritz Hollings-D --------- (803) 254-5120 (803) 327-1114 i YYYYY-YYY (8031 723-0700 Will.iam Horne-R Fomy Hartnetc-R YYYYYYYYY D-kt 3 (803) 720-8860 James Bland-R YYYYYYYYY (803) 641-1408 U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Fundamentals of Nuclear Power
    Fundamentals of Nuclear Power Juan S. Giraldo Douglas J. Gotham David G. Nderitu Paul V. Preckel Darla J. Mize State Utility Forecasting Group December 2012 Table of Contents List of Figures .................................................................................................................................. iii List of Tables ................................................................................................................................... iv Acronyms and Abbreviations ........................................................................................................... v Glossary ........................................................................................................................................... vi Foreword ........................................................................................................................................ vii 1. Overview ............................................................................................................................. 1 1.1 Current state of nuclear power generation in the U.S. ......................................... 1 1.2 Nuclear power around the world ........................................................................... 4 2. Nuclear Energy .................................................................................................................... 9 2.1 How nuclear power plants generate electricity ..................................................... 9 2.2 Radioactive decay .................................................................................................
    [Show full text]