Summary Table of Contents

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Summary Table of Contents SUMMARY TABLE OF CONTENTS Foreword ................................................................................................ i Preface .............................................................................................. iii Table of Abbreviations..................................................................... vi Summary Table of Contents .................................................CON - 1 Detailed Table of Contents ...................................................CON - 9 Supplemental Table of Cases ................................................STC - 1 Table of Cases............................................................................. TC - 1 Table of Statutes........................................................................ TS - 1 Table of Rules............................................................................. TR - 1 Table of Regulations .............................................................. REG - 1 VIEW FROM THE TOP: ADMINISTRATIVE LAW IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CANADA 2017-2018................................................................................2018VT -1 2016-2017................................................................................2017VT -1 2015-2016................................................................................2016VT -1 2014-2015................................................................................2015VT -1 2013-2014................................................................................2014VT -1 CON - 1 December 2018 Page PART I JUDICIAL REVIEW JURISDICTION CHAPTER 1 JURISDICTION TO GRANT PREROGATIVE REMEDIES, DECLARATIONS AND INJUNCTIONS 1:1000 INTRODUCTION ............................................................ 1 - 1 1:2000 CERTIORARI AND PROHIBITION............................... 1 - 5 1:3000 MANDAMUS ................................................................. 1 - 33 1:4000 QUO WARRANTO......................................................... 1 - 49 1:5000 HABEAS CORPUS........................................................ 1 - 52 1:6000 DECLARATIONS AND INJUNCTIONS: AN INTRODUCTION....................................................... 1 - 59 1:7000 DECLARATIONS .......................................................... 1 - 62 1:8000 INJUNCTIONS.............................................................. 1 - 72 CHAPTER 2 THE APPLICATION FOR JUDICIAL REVIEW 2:1000 INTRODUCTION ............................................................ 2 - 1 2:2000 THE BRITISH COLUMBIA AND ONTARIO JUDICIAL REVIEW PROCEDURE ACTS.................2 - 2 2:3000 PRINCE EDWARD ISLAND'S JUDICIAL REVIEW ACT............................................................. 2 - 36 2:4000 FEDERAL COURTS ACT............................................. 2 - 40 CHAPTER 3 DISCRETIONARY BARS TO JUDICIAL REVIEW 3:1000 INTRODUCTION ............................................................ 3 - 1 3:2000 ADEQUATE ALTERNATIVE REMEDIES .................... 3 - 6 3:3000 MOOTNESS, LACK OF UTILITY AND JUSTICIABILITY ...................................................... 3 - 46 3:4000 PREMATURITY ............................................................ 3 - 57 CON - 2 Page 3:5000 DELAY ........................................................................... 3 - 68 3:6000 WAIVER......................................................................... 3 - 74 3:7000 OTHER DISQUALIFYING CONDUCT........................ 3 - 76 3:8000 TECHNICAL DEFECTS AND NON-MATERIAL ERRORS..................................................................... 3 - 79 3:9000 BALANCE OF CONVENIENCE .................................. 3 - 83 PART II JUDICIAL REVIEW PROCEDURE CHAPTER 4 PARTIES TO A JUDICIAL REVIEW PROCEEDING 4:1000 INTRODUCTION ............................................................ 4 - 1 4:2000 CAPACITY....................................................................... 4 - 2 4:3000 STANDING TO SEEK JUDICIAL REVIEW ................. 4 - 9 4:4000 RESPONDENTS............................................................ 4 - 52 4:5000 INTERVENORS ............................................................ 4 - 65 CHAPTER 5 COMMENCEMENT OF JUDICIAL REVIEW PROCEEDINGS 5:0000 OVERVIEW ..................................................................... 5 - 1 5:1000 LIMITATION PERIODS ................................................. 5 - 6 5:2000 THE NATURE OF THE RELIEF SOUGHT ................ 5 - 24 5:3000 COMMENCEMENT OF PROCEEDINGS IN ONTARIO, MANITOBA AND PEI............................ 5 - 56 5:4000 PETITIONS IN BRITISH COLUMBIA AND THE YUKON ............................................................. 5 - 77 5:5000 ALBERTA AND THE NORTHWEST TERRITORIES........................................................... 5 - 80 5:6000 SASKATCHEWAN ........................................................ 5 - 84 5:7000 NEW BRUNSWICK ...................................................... 5 - 87 5:8000 NOVA SCOTIA AND NEWFOUNDLAND................... 5 - 90 5:9000 JUDICIAL REVIEW IN THE FEDERAL COURT ...... 5 - 95 CON - 3 December 2018 Page CHAPTER 6 INTERLOCUTORY PROCEEDINGS, PERFECTION AND ORDERS 6:1000 INTRODUCTION ............................................................ 6 - 1 6:2000 STAY OF PROCEEDINGS.............................................. 6 - 2 6:3000 OTHER INTERIM RELIEF .......................................... 6 - 34 6:4000 MOTIONS ...................................................................... 6 - 36 6:5000 EVIDENCE IN JUDICIAL REVIEW PROCEEDINGS ............................................................ 6 - 49 6:6000 THE APPLICATION RECORD .................................... 6 - 84 6:7000 THE FACTUM, BRIEF, OR MEMORANDUM OF FACT AND LAW ....................................................... 6 - 97 6:8000 FORM OF THE COURT ORDER ............................... 6 - 109 PART III REVIEW OF ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURE CHAPTER 7 THE DUTY OF FAIRNESS: ITS SCOPE AND CONTENT 7:1000 OVERVIEW ..................................................................... 7 - 1 7:2000 THE SCOPE OF THE DUTY OF FAIRNESS.............. 7 - 26 7:3000 PROCEDURAL FAIRNESS: CONTENT AND CONTEXT .................................................................. 7 - 65 CHAPTER 8 STATUTORY AND CONSTITUTIONAL PROCEDURAL REQUIREMENTS 8:1000 INTRODUCTION ............................................................ 8 - 1 8:2000 STATUTORY PROCEDURES......................................... 8 - 2 8:3000 ALBERTA'S ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES ACT .................................................................................. 8 - 4 CON - 4 Page 8:3500 BRITISH COLUMBIA'S ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNALS ACT........................................................ 8 - 5 8:4000 ONTARIO'S STATUTORY POWERS PROCEDURE ACT ...................................................... 8 - 8 8:5000 THE PUBLIC INQUIRIES ACTS ................................ 8 - 25 8:6000 CANADIAN BILL OF RIGHTS .................................... 8 - 29 8:7000 CANADIAN CHARTER OF RIGHTS AND FREEDOMS ............................................................... 8 - 34 CHAPTER 9 PRE-HEARING PARTICIPATORY RIGHTS: NOTICE, DISCLOSURE, DELAY AND ADJOURNMENTS 9:1000 NOTICE: THE GENERAL RULE................................... 9 - 1 9:2000 WHO IS ENTITLED TO NOTICE? .............................. 9 - 12 9:3000 THE MANNER IN WHICH NOTICE MUST BE GIVEN.................................................................. 9 - 24 9:4000 TIME WHEN NOTICE MUST BE GIVEN.................................................................. 9 - 31 9:5000 CONTENT OF THE NOTICE....................................... 9 - 33 9:6000 DISCLOSURE OF EVIDENCE BY A PARTY ............. 9 - 54 9:7000 DISCLOSURE OF EVIDENCE BY THE ADMINISTRATIVE AGENCY................................... 9 - 64 9:8000 DELAY ........................................................................... 9 - 78 9:9000 ADJOURNMENTS ........................................................ 9 - 97 CHAPTER 10 THE HEARING AND PARTICIPATORY RIGHTS 10:0000 THE RIGHT TO PARTICIPATE .................................. 10 - 1 10:1000 ORAL HEARINGS......................................................... 10 - 3 10:2000 IN CAMERA HEARINGS ........................................... 10 - 16 10:3000 THE RIGHT TO COUNSEL ....................................... 10 - 27 10:4000 THE RIGHT TO AN INTERPRETER ........................ 10 - 44 10:5000 THE RIGHT TO ADDUCE EVIDENCE..................... 10 - 50 10:6000 THE RIGHT TO CROSS-EXAMINE .......................... 10 - 80 10:7000 EXCLUSION OF WITNESSES .................................. 10 - 90 10:8000 OFFICIAL NOTICE .................................................... 10 - 93 CON - 5 December 2018 Page 10:9000 THE RIGHT TO MAKE SUBMISSIONS ................. 10 - 100 CHAPTER 11 INTEREST, BIAS AND INDEPENDENCE 11:1000 INTRODUCTION .......................................................... 11 - 1 11:2000 PECUNIARY OR PROPRIETARY INTEREST IN THE DECISION ................................................... 11 - 6 11:3000 THE CONCEPT OF REASONABLE APPREHENSION OF BIAS .................................... 11 - 10 11:4000 DISQUALIFICATION FOR REASONABLE APPREHENSION OF BIAS .................................... 11 - 21 11:5000 EXCEPTIONS AND DEFENCES............................... 11 - 71 11:6000 RAISING AN OBJECTION......................................... 11 - 82 CHAPTER 12 REVIEW OF THE DECISION-MAKING PROCESS 12:1000 INTRODUCTION .......................................................... 12 - 1 12:2000 OBTAINING EXTRA-RECORD
Recommended publications
  • "The Death of the Irreparable Injury Rule" in Canada
    "THE DEATH OF THE IRREPARABLE INJURY RULE" 957 "THE DEATH OF THE IRREPARABLE INJURY RULE" IN CANADA DAVID A. CRERAR• RJR-MacDonald establishes the current tripartite RJR MacDonald presente /es trois criteres de la Canadian test for i'!functions. The applicant must preuve permettant actuellement de justifier la establish first, a serious question to be tried, necessite des i'!fonctions au Canada. Le premier second, that irreparable harm will result if the critere consiste a etab/ir qu 'ii s 'agit d'une question injunction is not granted, and third, that the serieuse ajuger; le second doit prouver un risque balance of convenience favours an i'!function. The de dommage irreparable; et le troisieme est celui de author argues that the entrenchment in the test of la preponderance des inconvenients. Se/on /'auteur, irreparable harm, with its multiplicity of meanings, la constitutionnalisation de la preuve du prejudice has caused confusion in the jurisprudence. The irreparable, et son caractere polysemique, seme la author starts by tracing the genealogy and confusion dans la jurisprudence. L 'auteur retrace substance of the doctrine of irreparable harm in the d'abord /es origines et la substance du principe du English case of American Cyanamid and the prejudice irreparable dans la cause anglaise Canadian cases of Metropolitan Stores and RJR American Cyanamid et /es causes canadiennes The author argues that despite judicial protestations Metropolitan Stores et RJR II estime que, to the contrary, irreparable harm survives as a contrairement a ce qu 'affirme la magistrature, le condition precedent which will sometime unfairly prejudice irreparable subsiste a titre de condition deny an injunction.
    [Show full text]
  • Agriculture and Marketing — (Continued)
    Agriculture and Marketing — (Continued) Murray, Ralph C................. 3,636 44 Smith, David M.................. 2,795 48 Murray, Robert A............... 6,591 73 Smith, George C................. 6,734 99 Murray. Thomas A............. 4,721 56 Smith, Judith M.................. 2.402 94 Murray, Vernon R.............. 6.067 36 Smith, Weldon L................ 4,124 I I Neary, James M.................. 3,148 78 Sodhi, B. S........................... 2,003 51 Nicholson, Fraser C............ 2,385 92 Stead, Phillip B................... 4,164 64 Nixon, William A................ 5,586 37 Stewart, Peter S................... 5,322 19 Nunn, Thomas R................ 4,865 01 Swan, Stephen .................. 5,411 91 Oderkirk, Alexander H. F. 5,494 30 Swinkels, Peter M............... 6,395 84 O'Reilly, Ellen M................ 3,376 85 Tait, John C........................ 4,334 93 Palfrey, G. Donald ........... 5,918 23 Taylor, Ralph H................. 3,983 94 Parker, Joan M................... 4,192 38 Thompson. Charles N........ 5,880 85 Phillips, Robin M................ 6,818 84 Thomson, John P............... 2,954 41 Pick, Arthur A..................... 7,514 65 Thurber, Ethelynn............. 3,060 93 Pierce, Fredrick A............... 6,139 73 Thyssen, Yvonne............... 4,749 58 Porter, Sherry E.................. 8,075 58 Tomlinson, Michael J........ 8,459 45 Redden, John E................... 3,154 32 Trenholm, Bruce M............ 4,836 58 Rideout, Peter J ................... 6,552 86 Van der Leest, J a n ............. 5,476 44 Roach, Henry J ................... 4,539 23 Van Dyk, Jean B................ 7,982 82 Robinson, David E............. 2,883 74 Walsh, Frederick A............ 4,853 97 Rouse, A n g u s..................... 6,064 61 Warman, Philip R..............
    [Show full text]
  • Flowcasting the Retail Supply Chain
    title 4/6/06 9:58 AM Page 1 "Never forecast what you can calculate." Dr. Joseph Orlicky "When it comes to Retail Supply Chain Management, people are beginning to understand that Demand Planning should start at store level. What we must now agree upon is that Demand Planning should also end at store level. This book is dedicated to that objective." André Martin, Mike Doherty and Jeff Harrop title 4/6/06 9:58 AM Page 2 Advance Praise for Flowcasting the Retail Supply Chain "Very often we read about Supply Chain principles such as Visibility, Collaboration, Flexibility, and Integration. We understand the concepts, agree with the principles, and look for ways to turn concept into reality. Flowcasting brings these prin- ciples to life. Its focus on simplifying Forecasting, combined with the tremendous versatility of time phased planning is both leading edge and exe- cutable today. Andre, Mike, and Jeff have done a great job of demonstrating the practical application ofFlowcasting concepts with everyday Retail challenges. Flowcasting is a great read, and worthy of serious consideration." Geoff Frodsham - Senior Vice President, Canadian Logistics Loblaw Companies Limited title 4/6/06 9:58 AM Page 3 "André Martin has had a dream and vision to inte- grate end-to-end the "extended supply chain" all the way down to the store shelf. The future is now here and what was previously unmanageable in real life is now possible - driving the factory floor from the store shelf. Leveraging collaborative business processes along with the strength of the time series DRP orders forecasting methodology has positioned his dream into the industry's emerging best practice." Robert Bruce - Former Vice President, Supply Chain Strategies Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • The Shelf Space and Strategic Placement of Healthy and Discretionary Foods in Urban, Urban-Fringe and Rural/ Non-Metropolitan Australian Supermarkets
    Public Health Nutrition: 21(3), 593–600 doi:10.1017/S1368980017003019 The shelf space and strategic placement of healthy and discretionary foods in urban, urban-fringe and rural/ non-metropolitan Australian supermarkets Adrian J Cameron* Global Obesity Centre, Deakin University, 221 Burwood Highway, Burwood, VIC 3125, Australia Submitted 27 September 2016: Final revision received 4 September 2017: Accepted 6 September 2017: First published online 16 November 2017 Abstract Objective: Supermarkets are a key influence on eating behaviours, but it is unknown if the promotion of food within stores varies on a geographic gradient from urban, to urban-fringe and non-metropolitan areas. The present study aimed to assess the shelf space and strategic placement of healthy and discretionary foods in each of urban, urban-fringe and non-metropolitan Australian supermarkets. Design/Setting: In-store audits were conducted in stores from one of the two major Australian supermarket chains in urban (n 19), urban-fringe (n 20) and non-metropolitan (n 26) areas of Victoria. These audits examined selected food items (crisps/chips, chocolate, confectionery, soft drinks/sodas, fruits and vegetables) and measured the shelf space and the proportion of end-of-aisle and cash register displays containing these products. Store size was measured as the sum of aisle length. Differences in the supermarket food environment with respect to location were assessed, before and after adjustment for neighbourhood socio-economic position. Results: The strategic placement of discretionary foods was commonly observed in all supermarkets. Adjusting for store size (larger in urban-fringe and rural areas), urban stores had greater shelf space devoted to fruits and vegetables, and less checkouts with soft drinks, than urban-fringe and rural/non-metropolitan areas.
    [Show full text]
  • Metropolitan. Stores
    ' .. • . , , " ~y, Deeewber ~n~962=.-,-_____________---:T:..B~l\l_J_B..;.W;..I_S_B_P_O_S_T ________________ ----p-Me..::.:....;,.\SeVeJJ..;....~te-erI Thursday, December 20, 1962 Page Sixteen THE JEWISH POST Image of the Jew in Negro Community Holiday Greetings to our Jewish Friends and Clients (Cont. from page 10) ity among men, of the brotherhood their: 'considering their people su­ of all men UllIler one God, have not perior, ours inferior: considering Jews did work for equality, the been hearki9"ed:to too often in the theirs; eonsidering their people su­ Maisonneuve Shoe Supply Co. Liel. majority were more than hedging. past. They have helped t:reate a gent, ours innately retarded; con­ TASHLICH 4281 Iberville Street MONTREAL LAfontaine 6-7759 Jews llave it in their organizational climate of opinion that is favorable Sidering their people superior ill she was living in exile~. She didn't seem to . power to respond massively to the to abolishing all practices of dis- manners and behaviour, ours inferior LAfontaine 6-7750 ever stop meditating, would pause to examin~ plight ot the American Negro on ~ erimination. The impetus for mak- in all ways. As it was a lie when ., broad a scale as we have to the ing this appeal'comes not juSt from 'applied to us, so is it a lie when . , trees and would reflectively start down well , Reprinted from TbeJewisb Chronicle , . .' shafts. I kept trying to meet ,herb~tcouldn't needs of Jews overseas., ~t Mr. personal observation but from reli- applied to the Negro. Translated by the author anll- Cecil Hem1ey . think of a plan.
    [Show full text]
  • Public Accounts of the Province of Manitoba for the Fiscal Year Ending Nov. 30
    CASH PAYMENTS TO CORPORATIONS, ETC., 1969 - 1970 209 GOVERNMENT OF THE PROVINCE OF MANITOBA Cash paid to corporations, firms, individuals, municipalities, cities, towns and villages, arranged in alphabetical order to show the amount paid to each payee where the total payments exceed $1,000.00 for the year ended 31st March, 1970 (For Salaries, Page No. 175) Name Address Amount Name Address Amount “A" Acme Seeley Business Systems Ltd., Toronto, A & A, Toronto, Ont. $ 3,391.46 Ont. 9,388.00 Aactive Electric Co., Acme Welding & Supply Winnipeg . 1,072.21 Ltd., Winnipeg . 5,750.55 \ A E I Telecommunications Acres & Co., Ltd., H. G., Canada Ltd., Winnipeg .... 1,045.12 Niagara Falls, Ont. 99,114.37 A & H Equipment Leasing Acthim, J., Winnipeg . 1,076.18 j Co., Winnipeg . 2,186.01 Active Transfer & AIM Steel Ltd., Regina, Messenger, Winnipeg . 1,055.45 ! Sask. 2,569.56 Adams Supply Co. Ltd., A., ; A-l Sewage Services, Winnipeg . 1,102.35 St. Boniface . 1,373.50 Adams, E. H., Goodlands . 1,549.60 Abbott Clinic, Winnipeg .... 1,631.25 Adams, Ivor, Swan River .... 16,562.92 Abbott Laboratories Ltd., Adams, Lorraine, Dauphin .. 2,977.36 Montreal, Que. 5,405.05 Adams, Norman R., ’Abel & Company Canada Goodlands . 3,078.00 Ltd., Richard, Richmond Adams Store, Skownan . 5,718.56 1 Hill, Ont. 12,628.22 Adams, Walter, Portage Abelard, Schuman Canada la Prairie . 2,336.35 Ltd., Scarboro, Ont. 1,007.27 Adanac Household Supplies Aberdeen Hotel Ltd., (1968) Ltd., Winnipeg .... 31,148.26 Winnipeg . 1,359.13 Addison-Wesley Canada Abe’s Service, Plumas .
    [Show full text]
  • Integrated Annual Report
    Integrated Annual Report for the year ended December 2018 OUR COMMITMENT: OUR DIVISIONS: TO SAVE OUR CUSTOMERS MONEY SO THEY CAN LIVE BETTER COMPRISES FOUR DIVISIONS OPERATING 436 STORES IN OUR PURPOSE: 13 SUB-SAHARAN COUNTRIES To be the most trusted, high-volume, lowest cost, wholesale and retail group in sub- Saharan Africa, delivering exceptional value Through our widely-recognised, differentiated retail to mass market consumers. and wholesale formats, we have leading shares in the General Merchandise, Liquor, Home Improvement OUR BUSINESS: and Wholesale Food markets. Our key foundations Our business model is built on high-sales of high volume, low cost and operational excellence density formats, procurement scale and enable our price leadership. cost-efficient routes to market. As a result, we are able to optimise supplier distribution and obtain price leadership, which enables us to deliver on our commitment of saving our customers money so they can live better. Table of contents Our business Transparency and Our performance 02 at a glance 04 06 accountability 18 24 49 65 87 92 Our business Our business Chief Financial Independent Our approach Board model Officer’s review auditor’s report to corporate Committee 20 governance feedback Our footprint 26 54 Our stakeholder Directors’ See more of our performance online 88 96 relationships report www.massmart.co.za/iar2018 Our Board Remuneration 22 /groupafs report Our value /companyafs creation story 57 /5yearreview Summary Consolidated Group Financial Our business Statements 03 context
    [Show full text]
  • Jewish Heritage Centre of Western Canada
    i " . ~: " , 'Thursday, December 11, 1969 THE. JEWISH POST r I ALIYAH INFORMATION -, .' • Women who do not wish to use for sentimental or other reasons, Everyone seriously considering '." : Elegant Handbags set .patterns may .use needlepoint 'be sure to consult Mr. Furmy~ of settling in Israel within the next THE ,·DACOTAH ; '. ' designs of their own . The result .Elvette Handbag Company. You --------~---- Ithree years is invited to contact the -.'1 . LechFurmyk of Elvette Handbag kind of service. Women who wish is an original, elegant bag, beauti­ Joyous Chanukah Greetings to ·BARNEY GLAZER Winnipeg branch of the MCA - MOTOR HOTEL Co. at 164 Princess St. started mak- to make their own needlepoint and fully designed and artistically the Jewish Community Association of Americans and Cana­ ing 'needlepoint bags in addition to petit point bags, may do so with executed. dians for Aliyah for information. I,N DOWNTOWN GRAND FORKS "We Appreciate Your his regular handbag manufacturing professional help from Mr. Furmyk. Elvetle Handbag Co. also does IN ROLLYWOOD The executive will make every "HEADQUARTERS FOR CANADIANS" Patronage" business about six or seven years It takes about 50 hours of hand- handbag repairs of all kinds. They effort to ,assis·t prospective Olim to CD Rcd Cape Bar and Coc1rtail LOlUlge - Live Entert:UrUncnt Nightly ago. The first year he made only work to complete the needlepoint. will change the handles, set in new make arrangements or to channel CD Red Garter Dining Room CD Blue Horizon Coffee Shop "a couple of dozen." Since then the The actual construction of the hand- forms, linings, etc.
    [Show full text]
  • CITY of CHATHAM D CLASSIFIED BUSINESS Direcrory 0
    BILL CITY OF CHATHAM D CLASSIFIED BUSINESS DIREcrORY 0 ABATIOIR Johns, J L, Entlf'P'I~S, b50 Grand ave L Lenover Brothers UmolA!d, n s Park av e ext ALUMINUM WINDOWS t. DOORS Armstrong, 0 B, 28 O'Neol A ACCOUNT AN T S~~LIC HOSKINS SUPPLY CO (CHATHAM) LIMITED, CHARTERED AND AUDITORS 24 0 William s Hutcningaml' Alummum Products, 2 Indian Creek Austin, G Harold, 52 Fourth road e M Brown , Edmund A, 89 Thames CHATHAM BOOKKEEPING & DUPLICATING AMBULANCES SERVICE, 218 StClair Chrysler, Shollln~oo & Co, 52 Fourth ARBOUR' S CHATHAM AMBULANCE, 159 Ralel~ 0 Janes, C Morley & Co, 31 Sixth Kirne, Beattl~ & Co, 39 Grand av w ANNUITIES Mirtm, Antl1ff & Co, 141 Gral'ld «V e Canad.an Govemmenl Annu1t.es, Federal Bldg McCrack~n , Chas, 188 lnshes av R Pearsoo, Edwards & Co, b7 A~lafde s ANTENNA INSTALLATION PEAT , LEONARD W, 204 Queen Richardsoo, E U & Co, 259 Queen Chatham TV Antenna lnstallat•on5, 401 Queen Papps Antenna Servocc, 1871'1 Rletwnood E ADDRESSING ANTIQUES CHATHAM STENOGRAPHIC SERVICE, 137 King w Pbotopphic Bloomfield House, w s Bloomfield Side rd Studio AGRICULTURAL IMPLEMENTS APARTMENT BUILDINGS ond Case Power & Equ,pment , b53 Grand iN e Chapman's Fann Equipment Ltd, 545 Grand ave And.- Block Apts, 1131, King w Camera Dent, J V & Soo, n s RlchmOf'ld Amold Apts, 342 King w INTERNATIONAL HARVESTER SALES & SERVICE, Avenel Apts, 141 Williams Shop 700 Rlchmood 8,1tes Apts, 30'1 Willlaro s Leeson Tractor Ltd, 400 Rlchmood ext Bosveld & Gr.tham Apts, 32 Lacroox McGrail F.-m Equ1pment, n s lndllll'l Creek rd w Brown Apts 1 87 H!l'vey 8ouud Spocer, Wm & Sons, s s Grand ave Burrows Apts, 58~ Thames Toml'n Mfg Co, 3 Wood Carltoo Arms, 190 Thaml's Tnack Wlleox Glen Farm Equipment, 35 Wellington e Comet A pts, s ·s Richmond Commerce Apt s, 4 7 Market sQ e Crump Apts, 10'n KinCJ w AIR CONDITIONING Eastoo Block Apts, b9~ King w P.
    [Show full text]
  • Metropolitan Stores Mondor Hosiery Limited Canada Post Office
    ,'.,J. THC JJ:WISH POST Thursday, November 30, 1961 Thursday, November 30, 1961 TH1!l JEWISH POST Page Forty-<llle Page Forty must also feel again what they felt Army and many well-meaning ac­ of them said, "I don't wish to talk about him at all." Others spoke in those first days after mankind Holiday Greetings to the Jewish Community • quaintances managed to find decency lost his innocence. in ~:)1otin's death because at the of the accident "reluctantly" and from , . critical moment he acted like a hero. held the event at arm's length. Conservative Judaism in merlca And of course it all happened long Philip Morrison, who is now at Cor­ -P~k: By LOUIS FINKELSTEIN Hillel was, first, describing the ~================-~-=..-----. +,--.,.....,-.---'"'-",----==;'1 nell University, said levelly, "It was ! ago. Mondor Hosiery Chancellor of the Jewish Theological Seminary of America, relation of the Torah to its central Best Wishes for a HaWY and Prosperous Chanukah ·to all our ,I So it is interesting to find that the the most painful time of my life BOSTON, LOS ANGELES the religious centre of Conservative Judaism commandment. He was one of the Patrons and Friends scientists who were then, or ever and I don't like to go back to it." LONDON most lem'ned scholars in the Jewish had been, at Los Alamos choose to They do not say why they are un­ Limited ONSERVATIVE Judaism is a relatively new movement. Yet, to I tradition. Obviously, commentaries willing. But it may be that if they Zipurslc.y's Kosher Meat Marlc.et avoid thinking of him.
    [Show full text]
  • The Lochner Era and Comparative Constitutionalism
    ARTICLE The Lochner era and comparative constitutionalism Sujit Choudhry* We should be careful to avoid the pitfall of Lochner v. New York which has been described by Professor Tribe... as being "not in judicial interven- tion to protect 'liberty' but in a misguided understanding of what liberty actually required in the industrial age." The Lochner era gave rise to serious questions about judicial review and the relationship between the court and the legislature.... President Arthur Chaskalson, Constitutional Court of South Africa' I therefore reject the application of the American line of cases that suggest that liberty under the Fourteenth Amendment includes liberty of contract. As I stated earlier these cases have a specific historical context, a context that incorporated into the American jurisprudence certain laissez-faire principles that may not have a corresponding application to the interpretation of the [Canadian] Charter [of Rights and Freedoms] in the present day. 2 Justice (later Chief Justice) Antonio Lamer, Supreme Court of Canada Faculty of Law, University of Toronto. E-mail: [email protected]; website: www.law.utoronto.ca/faculty/choudhry. I thank Blake Brown, Roy Lee, and Jo-Anne Pickel for excellent research assistance, Ted Tjaden for invaluable help in securing Supreme Court of Canada facta, Trish McMahon for helpful information, and Bernadette Mount for superb secretarial support. This work was financially supported by the Cecil Wright Foundation and the Connaught Foundation. An earlier version of this paper was presented at the 2001 Annual Meeting of the Law and Society Association in Budapest, the 2002 Annual Meeting of the Law and Society Association in Vancouver, and to audiences at the Witswatersrand University School of Law, and the Faculty of Law, University of Cape Town.
    [Show full text]
  • PDF Format Or in HTML at the Following Internet Site
    Telecom Decision CRTC 2005-53 Ottawa, 14 September 2005 Aliant Telecom Inc.'s request for interim relief with respect to the local winback rule and wireline promotion rules Reference: 8622-A53-200504953 In this Decision, the Commission denies Aliant Telecom Inc.'s (Aliant Telecom) request for interim relief from the local winback rule and the rules governing local wireline promotions in the residential local exchange market in Nova Scotia and Prince Edward Island pending the Commission's determination on Aliant Telecom's application in the proceeding commenced by Forbearance from regulation of local exchange services, Telecom Public Notice CRTC 2005-2, 28 April 2005. The application 1. Aliant Telecom Inc. (Aliant Telecom) filed an application, dated 22 April 2005, pursuant to Part VII of the CRTC Telecommunications Rules of Procedure, requesting interim relief with respect to the local winback rule and the rules governing local wireline promotions. 2. Specifically, Aliant Telecom requested that the Commission remove the local winback rule and the rules governing local wireline promotions in the residential local exchange market in Nova Scotia and Prince Edward Island (P.E.I.), on an interim basis, pending the Commission's determination on the company's application for forbearance in the proceeding commenced by Forbearance from regulation of local exchange services, Telecom Public Notice CRTC 2005-2, 28 April 2005 (Public Notice 2005-2). 3. Aliant Telecom asserted that it had suffered economic damage as a result of competition from a competitor, Bragg Communications Inc., carrying on business as EastLink (EastLink). Aliant Telecom also asserted that the local winback rule violated section 2(b) of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms (the Charter).
    [Show full text]