DOCSLIB.ORG

The Mediterranean: One Sea, Many Names

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

The 14th International Seminar on Sea Names Geography, Sea Names, and Undersea Feature Names The Mediterranean: One sea, many names Pokoly Bela (Senior Adviser, Committee on Geographical Names, Ministry of Agriculture and Regional Development, Hungary) 1.An Important Sea 1.1. The Mediterranean Sea, covering an area of 2,5 million sq. kms, holds its importance in its geographical position. Wedged between Europe, Asia and Africa, it is lined by no less than 21 independent states. Of all countries of the world at least one in ten has a coastline along its shores. Fig. 1. The Countries around the Mediterranean Sea 1.2. Indeed the sea has, over the centuries, lost some of its overwhelming position. With the expanding contacts to the Far East and with the exploration of the „new” continents, it was realized that it is no longer the centre of earth. 1.3 With the opening of the Suez Canal, with the discoveries of vastly important oil and gas deposits in the Middle East, and with expanding international contacts and tourism it has witnessed a comeback in the past two centuries. 2. It is not possible to highlight all aspects of this sea however, so I need to look some aspects of its naming. 2.1. As with all seas, local people of ancient times, unaware of other seas called it The 324 The 14th International Seminar on Sea Names Geography, Sea Names, and Undersea Feature Names Sea. Similarly with other seas, it was also called Great Sea by local peoples living along its shores. 2.2. The first specific names applied to the sea could be the Egyptian “Great Green” or “Very Green” from around the 2nd millenium BC (as decrypted from hieroglyphs), but these names may refer also to the Nile Delta. 2.3. Old Testament sources refer to the Hind/Last/Utmost/or Western Sea (yam ha- aharon [Deuteronomy 11:24, 34:2]), and to the Sea of the Philistines (yam pelishtim [Exodus 23:31]) 2.4. Both Greeks and Romans have, however colloquially called it “Our Sea” (Latin: Mare Nostrum), parallel with their rising consciousness. 2.5. In the work titled "De mundo" and probably not correctly attributed to Aristotle we find the expression "inner sea" (he eso thalassa) as opposed to the outer sea or ocean: it is this term that will eventually lead, in Latin translation, to the name Mare Internum. The Roman historian Sallust is believed to have used first this term in his description of the Jugurthine War in the 1st century BC. Fig. 2. Mare Internum on the Map of the Roman Empire in a modern school atlas ©Cartographia, Budapest 1997 3. Based on the expression "inner sea" (he eso thalassa) the Greeks started to use the name Mesogeios (Μεσόγειος), meaning "in the interior of lands" (μεσο, "middle" + γαιος, "land, earth"), some time around the birth of Christ. 3.1. Although the Latin term „mediterraneus” primarily means landlocked, „in the interior of lands”, it was Isidore of Seville (560-636 A.D.), one of the great scholars of the early Middle Ages, who in his work Etymologiae first fixed the term “Mediterraneus” in the present sense “between the lands”. 325 The 14th International Seminar on Sea Names Geography, Sea Names, and Undersea Feature Names Mare Magnum est quod ab occasu ex Oceano fluit et in meridiem vergit, deinde ad septentrionem tendit; quod inde magnum appellatur quia cetera maria in conparatione eius minora sunt. Iste est et Mediterraneus, quia per mediam terram usque ad orientem perfunditur, Europam et Africam Asiamque disterminans. (The Great Sea flows from the ocean in the west; it faces south and reaches north. It is called 'great' because other seas pale in comparison; it is called the Mediterranean because it washes against the surrounding land all the way to the east, dividing Europe, Africa, and Asia3 – in: Predrag Matvejević: Mediterranean: A Cultural Landscape Translated by MICHAEL HENRY HEIM. Los Angeles: University of California Press, 1999.) Fig. 3. Part of the world of Isidore of Seville as presented by K.Miller’s Mappaemundi. Stuttgart, 1895-1898 3.2. Subsequent cartographers of the Middle Ages used the term Mare Mediterraneum in the sense “between the lands” (of Europe, Asia and Africa)2 until the end of the 18th century, or roughly the time, when Latin was used for official documents. Fig. 4. Sebastian Münster’s 1540 edition 326 The 14th International Seminar on Sea Names Geography, Sea Names, and Undersea Feature Names of Ptolemy’s Geographia from James Ford Bell Library, University of Minnesota Fig. 5. Excerpt from a map of Europe Abraham Ortelius’ Theatrum Orbis Terrarum. 1570 Antwerp Fig. 6. Excerpt from a map of Europe by Johann Matthias Hase, 1789 3.3. With an overlap, from the 17th century onward national (French, English etc.) names gradually replace Latin in maps and atlases. 327 The 14th International Seminar on Sea Names Geography, Sea Names, and Undersea Feature Names Fig. 7. John Thomson’s Chart of the Mediterranean Sea 1817, Edinburgh 4. Today the sea is basically referred to in its translated forms of the Latin „Mediterraneum” in most languages, in its simplified form, or, in the case of Turkish, using the colour of white (bright), and – in Arabic – combining the specific elements of „middle” and „white”. 4.1. A summary in table form is given below for the names of the Mediterranean Sea in a number of languages3 : Language Name English translation Arabic Al-Baħr Al-Abyad Al- White Central Middle/ Sea/ ر حب ل ا) Mutawassit ( طس وت م ل ا ضيبألا English Mediterranean Sea French /la mer/ Méditerranée Mediterranean Sea Spanish Mar Mediterráneo Mediterranean Sea Italian /mar/ Mediterraneo Mediterranean Sea Slovenien Sredozemsko morje Mediterranean Sea Croatian/Serbian/Bosnian Sredozemno more Mediterranean Sea Albanian deti Mesdhe Mediterranean Sea Greek Mesogeios (Μεσόγειος) Mediterranean Sea Turkish Akdeniz White (bright) Sea (Middle (central (ןֹו כיִּתַה םָּי ַה) Hebrew Hayam Hatikhon Sea German Mittelmeer Middle (central) German formerly, rarely: Mittelländisches Meer Sea Mediterranean Sea Russian Средиземное море Mediterranean Sea 328 The 14th International Seminar on Sea Names Geography, Sea Names, and Undersea Feature Names References: 1 Predrag Matvejević: Mediterranean: A Cultural Landscape. Translated by MICHAEL HENRY HEIM. Los Angeles: University of California Press, 1999. 2 Egli, J.J. Nomina geographica. 2. Auflage, Leipzig, 1893 3 Päll, Peeter, Maailma kohanimed (Geographical names of the world). Tallinn 1999 329 .
Recommended publications
  • The Corvus, the Roman Boarding Device

    The Corvus, the Roman Boarding Device

    Wright State University CORE Scholar Classics Ancient Science Fair Religion, Philosophy, and Classics Spring 2020 The Corvus, the Roman Boarding Device Jacob Stickel Wright State University - Main Campus, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://corescholar.libraries.wright.edu/ancient_science_fair Part of the Ancient History, Greek and Roman through Late Antiquity Commons, History of Science, Technology, and Medicine Commons, and the Military History Commons Repository Citation Stickel , J. (2020). The Corvus, the Roman Boarding Device. Dayton, Ohio. This Presentation is brought to you for free and open access by the Religion, Philosophy, and Classics at CORE Scholar. It has been accepted for inclusion in Classics Ancient Science Fair by an authorized administrator of CORE Scholar. For more information, please contact [email protected]. A philological examination of Eratosthenes’ calculation of Earth’s circumference Kelly Staver1 1 Wright State University, Dayton, Ohio, U.S.A. Introduction Errors in Eratosthenes ’ Assumptions Historical Inconsistencies of Eratosthenes’ Final Result • A Greek mathematician named Eratosthenes calculated an accurate measurement Two of Eratosthene’s five assumtpions are either mistaken or questionable at • Cleomedes and John Philophus state Eratosthenes’ result was 250,000, whereas of the Earth’s circumference, that being 250,000 stades or close to Earth’s actual best: many others such as Vitruvius, Martianus Capella, Strabo, and many others state circumference of 40,120 km,¹ in Hellenistic Alexandria, Egypt circa 240 B.C.E.² • Assumption (1) is incorrect. The longitudinal difference between it was 252,000 stades.¹⁴ • To do this, Eratosthenes’ utilized the distance between Alexandria and Syene and Syene and Alexandria is about 3 degrees.⁶ • Benefits of 252,000 stades: gnomon measurements taken in Syene and Alexandria at noon on the summer • Assumption (2) is questionable since we do not know how long a • Yields a clean 700 stades per circular degree.¹⁵ solstice.³ stadion is.
  • The History of Cartography, Volume 3

    The History of Cartography, Volume 3

    THE HISTORY OF CARTOGRAPHY VOLUME THREE Volume Three Editorial Advisors Denis E. Cosgrove Richard Helgerson Catherine Delano-Smith Christian Jacob Felipe Fernández-Armesto Richard L. Kagan Paula Findlen Martin Kemp Patrick Gautier Dalché Chandra Mukerji Anthony Grafton Günter Schilder Stephen Greenblatt Sarah Tyacke Glyndwr Williams The History of Cartography J. B. Harley and David Woodward, Founding Editors 1 Cartography in Prehistoric, Ancient, and Medieval Europe and the Mediterranean 2.1 Cartography in the Traditional Islamic and South Asian Societies 2.2 Cartography in the Traditional East and Southeast Asian Societies 2.3 Cartography in the Traditional African, American, Arctic, Australian, and Pacific Societies 3 Cartography in the European Renaissance 4 Cartography in the European Enlightenment 5 Cartography in the Nineteenth Century 6 Cartography in the Twentieth Century THE HISTORY OF CARTOGRAPHY VOLUME THREE Cartography in the European Renaissance PART 1 Edited by DAVID WOODWARD THE UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO PRESS • CHICAGO & LONDON David Woodward was the Arthur H. Robinson Professor Emeritus of Geography at the University of Wisconsin–Madison. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago 60637 The University of Chicago Press, Ltd., London © 2007 by the University of Chicago All rights reserved. Published 2007 Printed in the United States of America 1615141312111009080712345 Set ISBN-10: 0-226-90732-5 (cloth) ISBN-13: 978-0-226-90732-1 (cloth) Part 1 ISBN-10: 0-226-90733-3 (cloth) ISBN-13: 978-0-226-90733-8 (cloth) Part 2 ISBN-10: 0-226-90734-1 (cloth) ISBN-13: 978-0-226-90734-5 (cloth) Editorial work on The History of Cartography is supported in part by grants from the Division of Preservation and Access of the National Endowment for the Humanities and the Geography and Regional Science Program and Science and Society Program of the National Science Foundation, independent federal agencies.
  • Alexander and the 'Defeat' of the Sogdianian Revolt

    Alexander and the 'Defeat' of the Sogdianian Revolt

    Alexander the Great and the “Defeat” of the Sogdianian Revolt* Salvatore Vacante “A victory is twice itself when the achiever brings home full numbers” (W. Shakespeare, Much Ado About Nothing, Act I, Scene I) (i) At the beginning of 329,1 the flight of the satrap Bessus towards the northeastern borders of the former Persian Empire gave Alexander the Great the timely opportunity for the invasion of Sogdiana.2 This ancient region was located between the Oxus (present Amu-Darya) and Iaxartes (Syr-Darya) Rivers, where we now find the modern Uzbekistan and Tajikistan, bordering on the South with ancient Bactria (present Afghanistan). According to literary sources, the Macedonians rapidly occupied this large area with its “capital” Maracanda3 and also built, along the Iaxartes, the famous Alexandria Eschate, “the Farthermost.”4 However, during the same year, the Sogdianian nobles Spitamenes and Catanes5 were able to create a coalition of Sogdianians, Bactrians and Scythians, who created serious problems for Macedonian power in the region, forcing Alexander to return for the winter of 329/8 to the largest city of Bactria, Zariaspa-Bactra.6 The chiefs of the revolt were those who had *An earlier version of this paper was presented at the Conflict Archaeology Postgraduate Conference organized by the Centre for Battlefield Archaeology of the University of Glasgow on October 7th – 9th 2011. 1 Except where differently indicated, all the dates are BCE. 2 Arr. 3.28.10-29.6. 3 Arr. 3.30.6; Curt. 7.6.10: modern Samarkand. According to Curtius, the city was surrounded by long walls (70 stades, i.e.
  • As Fast As a Hare: Colonization of the Heterobranch Aplysia Dactylomela (Mollusca: Gastropoda: Anaspidea) Into the Western Mediterranean Sea

    As Fast As a Hare: Colonization of the Heterobranch Aplysia Dactylomela (Mollusca: Gastropoda: Anaspidea) Into the Western Mediterranean Sea

    Cah. Biol. Mar. (2017) 58 : 341-345 DOI: 10.21411/CBM.A.97547B71 As fast as a hare: colonization of the heterobranch Aplysia dactylomela (Mollusca: Gastropoda: Anaspidea) into the western Mediterranean Sea Juan MOLES1,2, Guillem MAS2, Irene FIGUEROA2, Robert FERNÁNDEZ-VILERT2, Xavier SALVADOR2 and Joan GIMÉNEZ2,3 (1) Department of Evolutionary Biology, Ecology, and Environmental Sciences and Biodiversity Research Institute (IrBIO), University of Barcelona, Av. Diagonal 645, 08028 Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain E-mail: [email protected] (2) Catalan Opisthobranch Research Group (GROC), Mas Castellar, 17773 Pontós, Catalonia, Spain (3) Department of Conservation Biology, Estación Biológica de Doñana (EBD-CSIC), Americo Vespucio 26 Isla Cartuja, 42092 Seville, Andalucía, Spain Abstract: The marine cryptogenic species Aplysia dactylomela was recorded in the Mediterranean Sea in 2002 for the first time. Since then, this species has rapidly colonized the eastern Mediterranean, successfully establishing stable populations in the area. Aplysia dactylomela is a heterobranch mollusc found in the Atlantic Ocean, and commonly known as the spotted sea hare. This species is a voracious herbivorous with generalist feeding habits, possessing efficient chemical defence strategies. These facts probably promoted the acclimatation of this species in the Mediterranean ecosystems. Here, we report three new records of this species in the Balearic Islands and Catalan coast (NE Spain). This data was available due to the use of citizen science platforms such as GROC (Catalan Opisthobranch Research Group). These are the first records of this species in Spain and the third in the western Mediterranean Sea, thus reinforcing the efficient, fast, and progressive colonization ability of this sea hare.
  • 9 · the Growth of an Empirical Cartography in Hellenistic Greece

    9 · the Growth of an Empirical Cartography in Hellenistic Greece

    9 · The Growth of an Empirical Cartography in Hellenistic Greece PREPARED BY THE EDITORS FROM MATERIALS SUPPLIED BY GERMAINE AUJAe There is no complete break between the development of That such a change should occur is due both to po­ cartography in classical and in Hellenistic Greece. In litical and military factors and to cultural developments contrast to many periods in the ancient and medieval within Greek society as a whole. With respect to the world, we are able to reconstruct throughout the Greek latter, we can see how Greek cartography started to be period-and indeed into the Roman-a continuum in influenced by a new infrastructure for learning that had cartographic thought and practice. Certainly the a profound effect on the growth of formalized know­ achievements of the third century B.C. in Alexandria had ledge in general. Of particular importance for the history been prepared for and made possible by the scientific of the map was the growth of Alexandria as a major progress of the fourth century. Eudoxus, as we have seen, center of learning, far surpassing in this respect the had already formulated the geocentric hypothesis in Macedonian court at Pella. It was at Alexandria that mathematical models; and he had also translated his Euclid's famous school of geometry flourished in the concepts into celestial globes that may be regarded as reign of Ptolemy II Philadelphus (285-246 B.C.). And it anticipating the sphairopoiia. 1 By the beginning of the was at Alexandria that this Ptolemy, son of Ptolemy I Hellenistic period there had been developed not only the Soter, a companion of Alexander, had founded the li­ various celestial globes, but also systems of concentric brary, soon to become famous throughout the Mediter­ spheres, together with maps of the inhabited world that ranean world.
  • Northwestern Iberian Tin Mining from Bronze Age

    Northwestern Iberian Tin Mining from Bronze Age

    Northwestern Iberian Tin Mining from Bronze Age to Modern Times: an overview Beatriz Comendador Rey, Emmanuelle Meunier, Elin Figueiredo, Aaron Lackinger, João Fonte, Cristina Fernández Fernández, Alexandre Lima, José Mirão, Rui J.C. Silva To cite this version: Beatriz Comendador Rey, Emmanuelle Meunier, Elin Figueiredo, Aaron Lackinger, João Fonte, et al.. Northwestern Iberian Tin Mining from Bronze Age to Modern Times: an overview. A Celebration of the Tinworking Landscape of Dartmoor in its European context: Prehistory to 20th century, Dartmoor Tinworking Research Group, May 2016, Tavistock, United Kingdom. pp.133-153. hal-02024038 HAL Id: hal-02024038 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02024038 Submitted on 21 Mar 2019 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Northwestern Iberian Tin Mining from Bronze Age to Modern Times: an overview Beatriz Comendador Rey1*, Emmanuelle Meunier2, Elin Figueiredo3, Aaron Lackinger1, João Fonte4, 1 5 6 3 Cristina Fernández Fernández , Alexandre Lima , José Mirão , Rui J.C. Silva 1. Grupo de Estudos de Arqueoloxía, Antigüidade e Territorio (GEAAT), Universidade de Vigo, Spain 2. Laboratoire TRACES (CNRS), University of Toulouse Jean Jaurès, France 3. Centro de Investigação em Materiais (CENIMAT/I3N), Faculdade de Ciências e Tecnologia, Universidade NOVA de Lisboa, Portugal 4.
  • The Catalyst for Warfare: Dacia's Threat to the Roman Empire

    The Catalyst for Warfare: Dacia's Threat to the Roman Empire

    The Catalyst for Warfare: Dacia’s Threat to the Roman Empire ______________________________________ ALEXANDRU MARTALOGU The Roman Republic and Empire survived for centuries despite imminent threats from the various peoples at the frontiers of their territory. Warfare, plundering, settlements and other diplomatic agreements were common throughout the Roman world. Contemporary scholars have given in-depth analyses of some wars and conflicts. Many, however, remain poorly analyzed given the scarce selection of period documents and subsequent inquiry. The Dacian conflicts are one such example. These emerged under the rule of Domitian1 and were ended by Trajan2. Several issues require clarification prior to discussing this topic. The few sources available on Domitian’s reign describe the emperor in hostile terms.3 They depict him as a negative figure. By contrast, the rule of Trajan, during which the Roman Empire reached its peak, is one of the least documented reigns of a major emperor. The primary sources necessary to analyze the Dacian wars include Cassius Dio’s Roman History, Jordanes’ Getica and a few other brief mentions by several ancient authors, including Pliny the Younger and Eutropius. Pliny is the only author contemporary to the wars. The others inherited an already existing opinion about the battles and emperors. It is no surprise that scholars continue to disagree on various issues concerning the Dacian conflicts, including the causes behind Domitian’s and Trajan’s individual decisions to attack Dacia. This study will explore various possible causes behind the Dacian Wars. A variety of reasons lead some to believe that the Romans felt threatened by the Dacians.
  • Maps in Renaissance Libraries and Collections George Tolias

    Maps in Renaissance Libraries and Collections George Tolias

    25 • Maps in Renaissance Libraries and Collections George Tolias The aim of this chapter is to highlight some apparently “he compiles it [the description] into a well-ordered and peripheral yet widespread scholarly uses of maps during proportionally measured map lest it be lost.” 2 the Renaissance—uses associated with map collecting, The allegory broadly agrees with Strabo’s view of display, and study. The chapter examines the role of maps mapmaking as a process of mnemonic reconstruction.3 as visual memory aids in the light of the available evi- However, the fact that Cusanus used the map as a metaphor dence; it then traces the presence and arrangement of to help his readers understand both the process of recon- maps in Renaissance libraries and collections; and finally, it examines the symbolic functions and learned uses of maps within early modern humanistic culture. The research for this chapter was made possible by the Arthur and Janet Holzheimer Fellowship, 2001–2, awarded by the Institute for Re- search in the Humanities of the University of Wisconsin, Madison, and Maps as Memory Aids thanks are due to the fellows of the institute for their helpful comments in the early stages of the work. I was particularly fortunate in being able Although the Renaissance has been described as “the age to use the resources of the History of Cartography Project, and warm of manuals,” a period “inexhaustible in its search for nor- thanks are due to the members of the Project for their constant and valu- able assistance. Naturally, my warmest thanks of all would have gone mative principles of general and perennial value, which to David Woodward for his encouragement and generous advice.
  • Link to PDF File

    Link to PDF File

    THE ORIGIN OF ALEXANDER THE GREAT AND THE MACEDONIANS DOCUMENTATION ACCORDING TO ANCIENT GREEK LITERARY TEXTS Herodotus, Thucydides, Plutarchus, Arrian, Demosthenes, Polybius, Isocrates, Strabo, Hesiod INTRODUCTION This survey is written to prove historical facts that are actually indisputable and beyond the shadow of any doubt. However, since today there is on-going discourse on the self- evident, it might be useful that we should remain and explore these issues for a while. One of my recent studies on the origin of Alexander and the Macedonians, based on the works of great authors of ancient Greece has led to the documentation of the –more or less known- arguments on the issue. And since the semiotic value of the word is a far more serious issue that one could assume, and even more significantly when it concerns an historic and highly controversial word as Macedonia, it is essential to take a close look on what is recorded by the historians of antiquity1. Ι. THUCYDIDES (464 – 395 BC) Starting from the beginnings of the references on the term Hellenes/Greeks we see that Thucydides, one of the greatest historians and political philosophers of all times reports that before the Trojan War, there is no mention of the term Hellenes and that the first time we meet the term is in Homer as a definition of those from Fthiotis under Achilles who participated in the expedition against Troy – “the first Hellenes”2. In Homer, Thucydides continues, the Hellenes are referred to in the same sense as the Achaeans, Argaei (from Argos), Danaäns. It should be pointed out that the term “barbarians” is not met in the Homeric epics since the term “Hellenes” had not yet been singled out (and later established) “as the exact opposite definition” to distinguish Hellenes from ‘barbarians’3, as the great historian concludes.
  • Cave Dwellings in the Mediterranean Basin

    Cave Dwellings in the Mediterranean Basin

    ISSN 0354-8724 (hard copy) | ISSN 1820-7138 (online) Cave dwellings in the Mediterranean Basin Urdiales Viedma María EugeniaA*, Maccarone AlessandraB Received: July 2011 | Revised: October 2011 | Accepted: November 2011 Abstract The construction and use of subterranean caves for different functions has been relatively commonplace through- out history in different regions around the world, especially in the Mediterranean basin. Some of them are still standing at the beginning of the 21st century, and are a good example of adaptation to the geographic environ- ment, and a part of the historical heritage. Following a short overview of the different Mediterranean countries, this work pays special attention to the pre- sent use of caves as dwelling spaces in Italy, and particularly in Spain where the caves are currently in an interest- ing process of renovation to meet the needs of the present population. This process is helping to boost the local economy, and it is funded by both private and public sources in several towns in Andalusia (Spain). Keywords: Cave dwelling, Mediterranean basin, popular house, cultural heritage, bioclimatic housing Introduction encouraging their practical utilization in order to The excavation of subterranean areas has been rel- foster the development of rural areas at the begin- atively common throughout Human History, hav- ning of the 21st century. ing developed a wide range of functions, chief In the present work we present a synthesis of a among them mining, water transportation, prod- number of previous studies on the cave dwellings, uct and tool storage, and as places of worship, cem- alongside a new study carried out by the authors eteries, and more frequently as human dwellings, about the present and prospective status of these making the excavated home a typical popular con- homes.
  • Indigenous Mapmaking in Intertropical Africa

    Indigenous Mapmaking in Intertropical Africa

    3 · Indigenous Mapmaking in Intertropical Africa THOMAS J. BASSETT Although [they are] also known for their mapmaking A third factor behind the meager historiography is that skills, the cartography of the peoples of Africa is less restricted definitions of "map" have excluded a range well known than that of the Indians [of North and of processes and artifacts from serious study. Even if South America].1 This chapter could not have been written without the contributions of many individuals who provided references, illustrations, and critical Our knowledge of African mapmaking has substantially comments at various stages of its preparation. In particular I thank improved since Bruno Adler's seminal survey of non­ Daniel Ayana, Edmond Bernus, Donald Crummey, Jim Delehanty, Western cartographic traditions in 1910. This is particu­ Henry Drewal, Kimbwandaende Kia Bunseki Fu-Kiau, Christraud larly true for North African mapmaking, which emerged Geary, Christian Jacob, Manfred Kropp, Jamie McGowan, Philip out of ancient Egyptian civilizations and Islamic cultures.2 Porter, Labelle Prussin, Allen Roberts, Mary (Polly) Nooter Roberts, Charles Stewart, Jeffrey C. Stone, Taddesse Tamrat, Claude Tardits, and However, our understanding of sub-Saharan mapmaking Jan Vansina. remains comparatively weak (see fig. 3.1 for a reference 1. Bruno F. Adler, "Karty pervobytnykh narodov" (Maps of primi­ map of Africa). The historiography is particularly scanty. tive peoples), Izvestiya Imperatorskago Obshchestva Lyubiteley Yeste­ When maps of Africa do receive attention, the focus is al­ stvoznanya, Antropologii i Etnografii: Trudy Geograficheskago Otde­ most exclusively on European maps of the continent.3 The liniya (Proceedings of the Imperial Society of the Devotees of National Sciences, Anthropology, and Ethnology: Transactions of the Division of dearth of studies of indigenous African mapmaking may Geography) 119, no.
  • "The Failure of Alexander's Conquests and the Administration of Bactria

    "The Failure of Alexander's Conquests and the Administration of Bactria

    64 Hirundo The Failure of Alexander’s Conquest and Administration of Bactria-Sogdiana By Michèle Smith Both during his lifetime and following his death, Alexander III of Macedon became a legend for his conquest of the Persian Empire until “the limits of the known oecumene.”1 Despite this fame, several of Alexander the Great’s conquests were not as successful as popular memory suggests. The ancient evidence clearly states the difficulties during Al- exander’s campaigning in the upper satrapies of Bactria-Sogdiana in 329-327 B.C., which took approximately eighteen months to suppress.2 Some scholars have dismissed this as a difficult campaign in which Alexander ultimately succeeded. However, an in-depth study of the ancient evidence not only reveals the failures in the method of conquest which Alexander used in these satrapies, but also his inability to control the satrapy once he had re-crossed the Hindu Kush to conquer India.3 Thus, the events at Bactria-Sogdiana as recorded by the available ancient evidence demonstrate that Alexander only succeeded in “extricat[ing] himself from a problem largely of his own making” in these satrapies, as well as his greater failure in administering the empire.4 A study of the vulgate tradition reveals that his inflexible assertion of control on local practices caused revolt, which was impossible to completely suppress during his lifetime due to locals’ use of guerrilla tactics and unrelenting determination. This example illustrates the fact that Alexander was famous for his conquests, not the management of his empire. Alexander’s speech after the revolt at Hyphasis clearly indicates his preference to conquer new lands rather than to return to his doriktetos chora, “which are not held securely.”5 This proved to be one of his largest failures, as his empire was already unravelling even before his premature death in 323 B.C.