DOCSLIB.ORG

50+ Years of Protein Folding

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
50+ Years of Protein Folding ISSN 0006-2979, Biochemistry (Moscow), 2018, Vol. 83, Suppl. 1, pp. S3-S18. © Pleiades Publishing, Ltd., 2018. Original Russian Text © A. V. Finkelstein, 2018, published in Uspekhi Biologicheskoi Khimii, 2018, Vol. 58, pp. 7-40. REVIEW 50+ Years of Protein Folding A. V. Finkelstein Institute of Protein Research, Russian Academy of Sciences, 142290 Pushchino, Moscow Region, Russia; E-mail: [email protected] Received May 25, 2017 Revision received July 10, 2017 Abstract—The ability of proteins to spontaneously form their spatial structures is a long-standing puzzle in molecular biol- ogy. Experimentally measured rates of spontaneous folding of single-domain globular proteins range from microseconds to hours: the difference – 10-11 orders of magnitude – is the same as between the lifespan of a mosquito and the age of the Universe. This review (based on the literature and some personal recollections) describes a winding road to understanding spontaneous folding of protein structure. The main attention is given to the free-energy landscape of conformations of a protein chain – especially to the barrier separating its unfolded (U) and the natively folded (N) states – and to physical the- ories of rates of crossing this barrier in both directions: from U to N, and from N to U. It is shown that theories of both these processes come to essentially the same result and outline the observed range of folding and unfolding rates for single-domain globular proteins. In addition, they predict the maximal size of protein domains that fold under solely thermodynamic (rather than kinetic) control, and explain the observed maximal size of “foldable” protein domains. DOI: 10.1134/S000629791814002X Keywords: protein folding rate, Levinthal’s paradox, folding funnel, free-energy landscape, phase separation, free-energy barrier, detailed balance law, protein secondary structure formation and assembly Protein folding is a physical process during which a biologically-reasonable time interval, i.e. minutes (see protein chain acquires its native (biologically functional) Figs. 5 and 9 below), only in the case of “domain-by- spatial structure “by itself”. domain” formation of its structure, which can be facili- The spontaneous folding phenomenon was discov- tated by the stepwise appearance of a protein chain from ered by Anfinsen’s group in 1961 [1] on the example of the ribosome. It is also known that the relatively small spontaneous restoration of biochemical activity and “cor- (about 150 a.a.) globin chain is already able to bind its lig- rect” S–S bonds in vitro in bovine ribonuclease A after its and (heme) when the ribosome has only synthesized a lit- complete (including elimination of all S–S bonds) tle more than half of it [5]. These and similar facts lead to unfolding by a denaturing agent followed by returning it the assumption that cotranslational (and chaperone- back to the “native” conditions. This discovery was fur- dependent) folding of a protein chain in vivo significantly ther confirmed for many other proteins that were not sub- differs from its folding in vitro. ject to substantial posttranslational modification [2, 3]. However, there is no noticeable difference between In a living cell, a protein is synthesized on a ribosome cotranslational in vivo folding and in vitro renaturation in and “matures under the care” of special protein-chaper- the case of small single-domain proteins. According to ones. Synthesis of a protein chain occurs during seconds some recent works [6-8], in the case of such proteins to minutes. Overall production of the “complete” folded (which being labeled by 15N and 13C isotopes can be dis- protein requires approximately the same period of time – tinguished from the background of ribosomes and other there is no difference in the experiment [2-4]. cellular machinery) “polypeptides [on ribosomes] remain Thus, one might suggest that protein folding starts on unstructured during elongation but fold into a compact, the ribosome even before completion of the synthesis of native-like structure when the entire sequence is avail- the protein chain. Apparently, this is the case for large able” [6, 7], and “cotranslational folding … proceeds multidomain proteins. Thus, luciferase (approximately through a compact, non-native conformation [i.e. appar- 540 a.a.-long and folded into at least two domains) is ently, through something like a molten globule – AF], active immediately after biosynthesis [4]. Apparently, …the compact state rearranges into a native-like structure folding of such a large protein in vitro can occur during a immediately after the full domain sequence has emerged S3 S4 FINKELSTEIN from the ribosome” [8]. Thus, in vivo, on the ribosome, of 100 residues, as each residue can adopt at least two an incomplete single-domain protein chain behaves as a (“correct” and “wrong”), but rather even three (α, β, shortened by several C-terminal amino acid residues in “coil”) or 10 [22] or even (10_by_ϕ) × (10_by_ψ) = 100 vitro: it does not form a certain spatial structure [9]. conformations [21]; thus, their “brute force” search Two conclusions may be drawn from cotranslational should take about ∼2100, or 3100, or 10100, or 100100 ps behavior of small proteins. assuming that transition between conformations requires First, it (similarly to behavior of the heme-binding N- about 1 ps (the period of a thermal oscillation); this cor- terminal half of the globin chain, see above) is reminiscent responds to ∼1010, or 1025, or 1080, or even 10180 years. A of the behavior of “natively unfolded” proteins [10, 11], the full search can only be “brute force” because a protein majority of which represent molten globules and acquire may “sense” conformation stability only by directly certain spatial structure only upon binding a ligand. adopting it, as 1 Å deviation can greatly increase the Second, both in vivo and in vitro native structures chain energy in a dense protein globule. emerge only in complete amino acid protein sequences Structural biologists and biophysicists were deeply (or in protein domains whose chains are usually sufficient influenced by “Levinthal’s paradox” (E. Shakhnovich for formation of their proper structures [12]). compared this with the effect of “Fermat’s Last Lack of a principal difference in folding is also true Theorem” on beginning mathematicians). Furthermore, for participation of chaperones (whose main function is under the influence of the hypothesis that cotranslational prevention of protein aggregation in the dense “cellular (and chaperone-dependent) in vivo folding of a protein soup” [13]). Discovery of chaperones suggested that they chain significantly differs from its in vitro folding, many possessed “structure-forming” catalytic activity (see, for people assumed that there must be two solutions to this instance, [14] and references therein); thus, formation of paradox: (i) for in vitro and (ii) for in vivo folding; and, protein structure might proceed in completely different probably, one more solution for folding of model protein ways in vivo and in vitro. However, analysis of data provid- chains in silico [B. K. Lee, remark on a seminar at NIH]! ed in the work [14] showed that the best-studied chaper- Trying to solve his paradox, Levinthal suggested that one, GroEL, does not accelerate protein folding [15]; a native protein structure is not determined by stability, these data rather confirm the previous conclusion [16, i.e. not by the thermodynamics, but by the kinetics. 17], that GroEL acts as a temporary “trap”, which binds Therefore, a protein follows some special “fast” folding folding protein chains present in abundance, thus pre- pathway, and its native fold is just the end of this pathway venting their irreversible aggregation. with no regard for whether it is the most stable one. In Therefore, Anfinsen’s discovery of spontaneous fold- other words, Levinthal assumed that native structure cor- ing in vitro [1, 18] (further confirmed for a number of responds to a rapidly reachable minimum of chain free other proteins), lack of cotranslational formation of energy rather than the global one. native structures in incomplete proteins [6-8] along with However, computer experiments with lattice protein the possibility of chemical synthesis of a polypeptide models have convincingly demonstrated that chains folds chain, which spontaneously folds into an active protein into their most stable structure, i.e. the “native structure (experiments of Merrifield et al. [19]), – all this allows, to of a protein model” has the lowest energy, and thus pro- a first approximation, separating the spontaneous struc- tein folding is under thermodynamic rather than kinetic ture formation of a protein (at least, for a single-domain control [23, 24]. one) from its biosynthesis. Nevertheless, most protein folding hypotheses are The present review focuses on exactly the sponta- based on the “kinetic control hypothesis”. neous formation of a structure of a single-domain globu- In 1966 (even prior to Levinthal), Phillips suggested lar protein, i.e. on its in vitro folding. [25] that the protein folding core is formed at the N-ter- minus of its growing chain, whereas the remaining part is wrapped over this core. However, it was later demonstrat- HISTORICAL EXCURSUS ed that successful in vitro folding of many single-domain proteins and protein domains does not commence at their The ability of a protein chain to spontaneously fold N-termini [26, 27]. into a complex spatial structure has been puzzling researchers for a long time: the chain must find its native From personal memories. The paper of Phillips in structure (and the most stable one, as this structure is Scientific American attracted my attention in the Moscow found both in vitro and during biogenesis, i.e. starting Lenin Library in the same 1966. After seeing there for the from various initial conditions) among a countless num- first time a picture of three-dimensional atomic protein ber of others during several minutes or seconds that are structure, being a third-year student of PhysTech (the allocated by biology.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Chapter 6 Protein Structure and Folding
    Chapter 6 Protein Structure and Folding 1. Secondary Structure 2. Tertiary Structure 3. Quaternary Structure and Symmetry 4. Protein Stability 5. Protein Folding Myoglobin Introduction 1. Proteins were long thought to be colloids of random structure 2. 1934, crystal of pepsin in X-ray beam produces discrete diffraction pattern -> atoms are ordered 3. 1958 first X-ray structure solved, sperm whale myoglobin, no structural regularity observed 4. Today, approx 50’000 structures solved => remarkable degree of structural regularity observed Hierarchy of Structural Layers 1. Primary structure: amino acid sequence 2. Secondary structure: local arrangement of peptide backbone 3. Tertiary structure: three dimensional arrangement of all atoms, peptide backbone and amino acid side chains 4. Quaternary structure: spatial arrangement of subunits 1) Secondary Structure A) The planar peptide group limits polypeptide conformations The peptide group ha a rigid, planar structure as a consequence of resonance interactions that give the peptide bond ~40% double bond character The trans peptide group The peptide group assumes the trans conformation 8 kJ/mol mire stable than cis Except Pro, followed by cis in 10% Torsion angles between peptide groups describe polypeptide chain conformations The backbone is a chain of planar peptide groups The conformation of the backbone can be described by the torsion angles (dihedral angles, rotation angles) around the Cα-N (Φ) and the Cα-C bond (Ψ) Defined as 180° when extended (as shown) + = clockwise, seen from Cα Not
    [Show full text]
  • Protein Misfolding in Human Diseases
    Linköping Studies in Science and Technology Dissertation No. 1239 Protein Misfolding in Human Diseases Karin Almstedt Biochemistry Department of Physics, Chemistry and Biology Linköping University, SE-581 83 Linköping, Sweden Linköping 2009 The cover shows a Himalayan mountain range, symbolizing a protein folding landscape. During the course of the research underlying this thesis, Karin Almstedt was enrolled in Forum Scientium, a multidisciplinary doctoral program at Linköping University, Sweden. Copyright © 2009 Karin Almstedt ISBN: 978-91-7393-698-9 ISSN: 0345-7524 Printed in Sweden by LiU-Tryck Linköping 2009 Never Stop Exploring 83 ABSTRACT The studies in this thesis are focused on misfolded proteins involved in human disease. There are several well known diseases that are due to aberrant protein folding. These types of diseases can be divided into three main categories: 1. Loss-of-function diseases 2. Gain-of-toxic-function diseases 3. Infectious misfolding diseases Most loss-of-function diseases are caused by aberrant folding of important proteins. These proteins often misfold due to inherited mutations. The rare disease carbonic anhydrase II deficiency syndrome (CADS) can manifest in carriers of point mutations in the human carbonic anhydrase II (HCA II) gene. One mutation associated with CADS entails the His107Tyr (H107Y) substitution. We have demonstrated that the H107Y mutation is a remarkably destabilizing mutation influencing the folding behavior of HCA II. A mutational survey of position H107 and a neighboring conserved position E117 has been performed entailing the mutants H107A, H107F, H107N, E117A and the double mutants H107A/E117A and H107N/E117A. We have also shown that the binding of specific ligands can stabilize the disease causing mutant, and shift the folding equilibrium towards the native state, providing a starting point for small molecule drugs for CADS.
    [Show full text]
  • Evolution, Energy Landscapes and the Paradoxes of Protein Folding
    Biochimie 119 (2015) 218e230 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Biochimie journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/biochi Review Evolution, energy landscapes and the paradoxes of protein folding Peter G. Wolynes Department of Chemistry and Center for Theoretical Biological Physics, Rice University, Houston, TX 77005, USA article info abstract Article history: Protein folding has been viewed as a difficult problem of molecular self-organization. The search problem Received 15 September 2014 involved in folding however has been simplified through the evolution of folding energy landscapes that are Accepted 11 December 2014 funneled. The funnel hypothesis can be quantified using energy landscape theory based on the minimal Available online 18 December 2014 frustration principle. Strong quantitative predictions that follow from energy landscape theory have been widely confirmed both through laboratory folding experiments and from detailed simulations. Energy Keywords: landscape ideas also have allowed successful protein structure prediction algorithms to be developed. Folding landscape The selection constraint of having funneled folding landscapes has left its imprint on the sequences of Natural selection Structure prediction existing protein structural families. Quantitative analysis of co-evolution patterns allows us to infer the statistical characteristics of the folding landscape. These turn out to be consistent with what has been obtained from laboratory physicochemical folding experiments signaling a beautiful confluence of ge- nomics and chemical physics. © 2014 Elsevier B.V. and Societ e française de biochimie et biologie Moleculaire (SFBBM). All rights reserved. Contents 1. Introduction . ....................... 218 2. General evidence that folding landscapes are funneled . ....................... 221 3. How rugged is the folding landscape e physicochemical approach . ....................... 222 4.
    [Show full text]
  • Behind the Folding Funnel Diagram
    commentary Behind the folding funnel diagram Martin Karplus This Commentary clarifies the meaning of the funnel diagram, which has been widely cited in papers on protein folding. To aid in the analysis of the funnel diagram, this Commentary reviews historical approaches to understanding the mechanism of protein folding. The primary role of free energy in protein folding is discussed, and it is pointed out that the decrease in the configurational entropy as the native state is approached hinders folding, rather than guiding it. Diagrams are introduced that provide a less ambiguous representation of the factors governing the protein folding reaction than the funnel diagram. nderstanding the mechanism fewer) generally fold in times on the order to that shown in Figure 1. It is a schematic by which proteins fold to their of milliseconds to seconds (except in cases representation of how the effective Unative state remains a problem of with special factors that slow the folding, potential energy, implicitly averaged fundamental interest in biology, in spite of such as proline isomerization), there was over solvent interactions (in the vertical the fact that it has been studied for many indeed a paradox. The ultimate statement direction), and the configurational entropy years1. Moreover, now that misfolding has of the paradox was given in the language (in the horizontal direction) of a protein been shown to be the source of a range of of computational complexity5. Many decrease as the native state is approached; diseases, a knowledge of the factors that phenomenological models were proposed picturesque three-dimensional funnels are determine whether a polypeptide chain to show how the conformational space that also being used11.
    [Show full text]
  • The Protein Folding Problem
    The Protein Folding Problem Ken A. Dill,1,2 S. Banu Ozkan,3 M. Scott Shell,4 and Thomas R. Weikl5 1Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, 2Graduate Group in Biophysics, University of California, San Francisco, California 94143; email: [email protected] 3Department of Physics, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona 85287; email: [email protected] 4Department of Chemical Engineering, University of California, Santa Barbara, California 93106; email: [email protected] 5Max Planck Institute of Colloids and Interfaces, Department of Theory and Bio-Systems, 14424 Potsdam, Germany; email: [email protected] Annu. Rev. Biophys. 2008. 37:289–316 Key Words The Annual Review of Biophysics is online at structure prediction, funnel energy landscapes, CASP, folding biophys.annualreviews.org code, folding kinetics This article’s doi: 10.1146/annurev.biophys.37.092707.153558 Abstract Copyright c 2008 by Annual Reviews. The “protein folding problem” consists of three closely related puz- All rights reserved zles: (a) What is the folding code? (b) What is the folding mechanism? 1936-122X/08/0609-0289$20.00 (c) Can we predict the native structure of a protein from its amino acid sequence? Once regarded as a grand challenge, protein fold- ing has seen great progress in recent years. Now, foldable proteins and nonbiological polymers are being designed routinely and mov- ing toward successful applications. The structures of small proteins are now often well predicted by computer methods. And, there is now a testable explanation for how a protein can fold so quickly: A protein solves its large global optimization problem as a series of smaller local optimization problems, growing and assembling the native structure from peptide fragments, local structures first.
    [Show full text]
  • Shaping up the Protein Folding Funnel by Local Interaction: Lesson from a Structure Prediction Study
    Shaping up the protein folding funnel by local interaction: Lesson from a structure prediction study George Chikenji*†, Yoshimi Fujitsuka‡, and Shoji Takada*‡§¶ *Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Science, and ‡Graduate School of Science and Technology, Kobe University, Nada, Kobe 657-8501, Japan; †Department of Computational Science and Engineering, Graduate School of Engineering, Nagoya University, Nagoya 464-8603, Japan; and §Core Research for Evolutionary Science and Technology, Japan Science and Technology Agency, Nada, Kobe 657-8501, Japan Edited by R. Stephen Berry, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, and approved December 30, 2005 (received for review September 22, 2005) Predicting protein tertiary structure by folding-like simulations is CASP6, our group Rokko (as well as the server Rokky) used the one of the most stringent tests of how much we understand the SIMFOLD software as a primary prediction tool, demonstrating principle of protein folding. Currently, the most successful method one of the top-level prediction performances in the new fold for folding-based structure prediction is the fragment assembly category (elite club membership by the assessor, B.K. Lee). (FA) method. Here, we address why the FA method is so successful In this work, we start with comparison of the structures and its lesson for the folding problem. To do so, using the FA predicted in the past. We then design a structure prediction test method, we designed a structure prediction test of ‘‘chimera of ‘‘chimera proteins,’’ where the local structural preference is proteins.’’ In the chimera proteins, local structural preference is that for the wild-type (WT) sequence and nonlocal interactions specific to the target sequences, whereas nonlocal interactions are are the only sequence-independent compaction force.
    [Show full text]
  • THEORY of PROTEIN FOLDING: the Energy Landscape Perspective
    P1: NBL/ary/dat P2: N/MBL/plb QC: MBL/agr T1: MBL July 31, 1997 9:34 Annual Reviews AR040-19 Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. 1997. 48:545–600 Copyright c 1997 by Annual Reviews Inc. All rights reserved THEORY OF PROTEIN FOLDING: The Energy Landscape Perspective Jose´ Nelson Onuchic Department of Physics, University of California at San Diego, La Jolla, California 92093-0319 Zaida Luthey-Schulten and Peter G. Wolynes School of Chemical Sciences, University of Illinois, Urbana, Illinois 61801 KEY WORDS: folding funnel, minimal frustration, lattice simulations, heteropolymer phase diagram, structure prediction ABSTRACT The energy landscape theory of protein folding is a statistical description of a protein’s potential surface. It assumes that folding occurs through organizing an ensemble of structures rather than through only a few uniquely defined structural intermediates. It suggests that the most realistic model of a protein is a minimally frustrated heteropolymer with a rugged funnel-like landscape biased toward the native structure. This statistical description has been developed using tools from the statistical mechanics of disordered systems, polymers, and phase transitions of finite systems. We review here its analytical background and contrast the phenom- ena in homopolymers, random heteropolymers, and protein-like heteropolymers that are kinetically and thermodynamically capable of folding. The connection between these statistical concepts and the results of minimalist models used in by University of California - San Diego on 07/02/07. For personal use only. computer simulations is discussed. The review concludes with a brief discus- sion of how the theory helps in the interpretation of results from fast folding experiments and in the practical task of protein structure prediction.
    [Show full text]
  • Folding Proteins with Both Alpha and Beta Structures in a Reduced Model
    Folding Proteins with Both Alpha and Beta Structures in a Reduced Model Nan-Yow Chen Department of Physics, National Tsing Hua University, Hsinchu, Taiwan, Republic of China Advisor: Chung-Yu Mou Department of Physics, National Tsing Hua University, Hsinchu, Taiwan, Republic of China Advisor: Zheng-Yao Su National Center for High-Performance Computing, Hsinchu, Taiwan, Republic of China June, 2004 Contents Abstract iii 1 Introduction 1 2 Essentials of Proteins Structures and Numerical Methods 5 2.1 Building Blocks and Level of Protein Structures 5 2.2 Monte Carlo Method 9 3 Reduced Protein Folding Model (RPFM) 11 3.1 Coarse-Grained Representation of the Protein Molecules 12 3.1.1 Backbone Units 12 3.1.2 Side-chain Units 15 3.2 Interaction Potentials 19 3.3 Relative Energy Strengths and Conformation Parameters 34 3.3.1 Relative Energy Strengths 34 3.3.2 Conformation Parameters 36 i 4 Simulation Results and Analysis 39 4.1 Simulation Results 40 4.1.1 One Alpha Helix Case 40 4.1.2 One Beta Sheet Case 45 4.1.3 One Alpha Helix and One Beta Sheet Case 50 4.1.4 Effects of Dipole-Dipole Interactions and 56 Local Hydrophobic Interactions 4.2 Real Protein Peptides 59 5 Conclusions and Outlook 63 Bibliography 67 Appendix 71 ii Abstract A reduced model, which can fold both helix and sheet structures, is proposed to study the problem of protein folding. The goal of this model is to find an unbiased effective potential that has included the effects of water and at the same time can predict the three dimensional structure of a protein with a given sequence in reasonable time.
    [Show full text]
  • Folding Funnel J
    Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA Vol. 92, pp. 3626-3630, April 1995 Biophysics Toward an outline of the topography of a realistic protein- folding funnel J. N. ONUCHIC*, P. G. WOLYNESt, Z. LUTHEY-SCHULTENt, AND N. D. SoccI* tSchool of Chemical Sciences, University of Illinois, Urbana, IL 61801; and *Department of Physics-0319, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093-0319 Contributed by P. G. Wolynes, December 28, 1994 ABSTRACT Experimental information on the structure other; thus, intermediates are not present at equilibrium (i.e., and dynamics ofmolten globules gives estimates for the energy a free thermodynamic energy barrier intercedes). In a type I landscape's characteristics for folding highly helical proteins, transition, activation to an ensemble of states near the top of when supplemented by a theory of the helix-coil transition in this free-energy barrier is the rate-determining step. Type I collapsed heteropolymers. A law of corresponding states transitions occur when the energy landscape is uniformly relating simulations on small lattice models to real proteins smooth. When the landscape is sufficiently rugged, in addition possessing many more degrees of freedom results. This cor- to surmounting the thermodynamic activation barrier, at an respondence reveals parallels between "minimalist" lattice intermediate degree of folding, unguided search again be- results and recent experimental results for the degree ofnative comes the dominant mechanism. At this point, a local glass character of the folding transition state and molten globule transition has occurred within the folding funnel. If the glass and also pinpoints the needs of further experiments. transition occurs after the main thermodynamic barrier, the mechanism is classified as type IIa.
    [Show full text]
  • Energy Landscape in Protein Folding and Unfolding
    Energy landscape in protein folding and unfolding Francesco Mallamacea,b,c,1, Carmelo Corsaroa,d, Domenico Mallamacee, Sebastiano Vasid, Cirino Vasia, Piero Baglionif, Sergey V. Buldyrevg, Sow-Hsin Chenb, and H. Eugene Stanleyc,1 aCNR-Istituto per i Processi Chimico Fisici Messina, I-98166 Messina, Italy; bDepartment of Nuclear Science and Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139; cCenter for Polymer Studies and Department of Physics, Boston University, Boston, MA 02215; dDipartimento di Fisica e di Scienze della Terra, Università di Messina, I-98166 Messina, Italy; eConsorzio per lo Sviluppo dei Sistemi a Grande Interfase, Unità di Catania, I-95125 Catania, Italy; fDipartimento di Chimica, Università di Firenze and Consorzio per lo Sviluppo dei Sistemi a Grande Interfase, I-50019 Florence, Italy; and gDepartment of Physics, Yeshiva University, New York, NY 10033 Contributed by H. Eugene Stanley, December 22, 2015 (sent for review March 17, 2015; reviewed by Anders Nilsson and Michele Parrinello) We use 1H NMR to probe the energy landscape in the protein fold- simulation (9, 10) and different experimental techniques (11–16). ing and unfolding process. Using the scheme ⇄ reversible unfolded Whereas MD simulations directly model peptide conformational (intermediate) → irreversible unfolded (denatured) state, we study transitions in terms of the energy landscape, experiments supply the thermal denaturation of hydrated lysozyme that occurs when useful but limited information, revealing some details in the the
    [Show full text]
  • Theory of Protein Folding Jose´ Nelson Onuchic1,2, and Peter G Wolynes1,2,3
    Theory of protein folding Jose´ Nelson Onuchic1,2,Ã and Peter G Wolynes1,2,3 Protein folding should be complex. Proteins organize leave others to review the results of highly detailed all- themselves into specific three-dimensional structures, through atom simulation. a myriad of conformational changes. The classical view of protein folding describes this process as a nearly sequential Basic concepts series of discrete intermediates. In contrast, the energy The locations of atoms in proteins can be determined, in landscape theory of folding considers folding as the progressive favorable cases, to an accuracy of less than 3 A˚ using X-ray organization of an ensemble of partially folded structures crystallography. This specificity of structure arises from through which the protein passes on its way to the natively the heterogeneity of the protein chain. The differing folded structure. As a result of evolution, proteins have a rugged energies associated with positioning different residues funnel-like landscape biased toward the native structure. near or far from each other or from solvent enable some Connecting theory and simulations of minimalist models with structures to be more stable than others. If a sequence experiments has completely revolutionized our understanding is chosen at random, the specificity of structure is still of the underlying mechanisms that control protein folding. small — a variety of globally different structures have very low energies, but within a few kBT of each other. Addresses This mathematical observation has been the bane of 1Center for Theoretical Biological Physics, 2Department of Physics, computational protein structure prediction using energy 3 Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of California functions.
    [Show full text]
  • Thermodynamics and Kinetics of Iso-1-Cytochrome C Denatured State
    University of Montana ScholarWorks at University of Montana Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers Graduate School 2009 Thermodynamics and Kinetics of Iso-1-cytochrome c Denatured State Franco Ollan Tzul The University of Montana Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umt.edu/etd Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Recommended Citation Tzul, Franco Ollan, "Thermodynamics and Kinetics of Iso-1-cytochrome c Denatured State" (2009). Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers. 1112. https://scholarworks.umt.edu/etd/1112 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at ScholarWorks at University of Montana. It has been accepted for inclusion in Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks at University of Montana. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THERMODYNAMICS AND KINETICS OF ISO-1-CYTOCHROME C DENATURED STATE By FRANCO OLLAN TZUL B. Sc. Chemistry & Biology, Regis University, Denver, CO, USA, 1997 Dissertation presented in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Chemistry & Biochemistry The University of Montana Missoula, MT March 2009 Approved by: Perry Brown, Associate Provost for Graduate Education Graduate School Dr. J.B. Alexander Ross, Committee Chairperson Department of Chemistry & Biochemistry Dr. Bruce E. Bowler, Committee Member Department of Chemistry & Biochemistry Dr. Klára Briknarová, Committee Member Department of Chemistry & Biochemistry Dr. Michael DeGrandpre, Committee Member Department of Chemistry & Biochemistry Dr. Michele A. McGuirl, Committee Member Division of Biological Sciences Tzul, Franco O., Ph. D., Spring 2009 Chemistry & Biochemistry Thermodynamics and Kinetics of Iso-1-cytochrome c Denatured State Chairperson: J.
    [Show full text]