DOCSLIB.ORG

Sports and Concert Facilities / Special Events Golden State Warriors Event Center and Mixed-Use Development SEIR, San Francisco, CA

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Sports and Concert Facilities / Special Events Golden State Warriors Event Center and Mixed-Use Development SEIR, San Francisco, CA EDUCATION Mr. Mitchell has provided project management and technical analysis capabilities for a wide variety of projects requiring environmental review, B.S., Civil Engineering, San including transportation and transit, industrial, institutional, commercial, Francisco State residential, mixed-use, educational and recreational projects. He has served University as project director / project manager for a number of CEQA environmental 23 YEARS documents, including environmental review for sports facilities and sporting EXPERIENCE events, capital improvement projects, wineries and vineyards, quarries, university and local school district master plans, specific plans, planned use developments, transit service plans, multi-modal stations, and demolition projects. Mr. Mitchell’s technical analysis responsibilities include required CEQA/NEPA analysis of transportation, air quality, noise, land use and policies, and infrastructure issues. Sports and Concert Facilities / Special Events Golden State Warriors Event Center and Mixed-Use Development SEIR, San Francisco, CA. Project Manager. Paul recently managed a Subsequent EIR for a landmark $1 billion, privately funded development within the thriving Mission Bay neighborhood in San Francisco. The centerpiece is an 18,000-plus–seat event center that will be the new home of the Golden State Warriors basketball team, during the NBA season, and provide a year-round venue for a variety of other uses, including concerts, family shows, other sporting events, cultural events, conferences and conventions. Office, retail, and open space uses and structured parking are also proposed. A Subsequent EIR (SEIR) was prepared for the project, tiering from the 1998 Mission Bay Final SEIR. The project was processed under CEQA streamlining legislation of both AB 900 (“environmental leadership project”) and SB 743. The SEIR included substantial detailed modeling for transportation, air quality, health risks, noise, utilities, and wind and shadow; a helipad airspace assessment, site-specific archaeological testing, urban decay analysis, and stand-alone TMP. Important considerations included ensuring effects of the project on the adjacent UCSF Mission Bay campus and its medical center were fully addressed, and cumulative environmental effects of events of the proposed event center in conjunction with concurrent baseball games at nearby AT&T Park. The Final SEIR was unanimously approved by the City in December 2015. The SEIR adequacy was upheld by the California Superior Court and the California Court of Appeals on all accounts, and in January 2017, the California Supreme Court denied a petition to consider the case for further review. The project will be constructed in time for the Golden State Warriors 2019-20 season. Prior to GSW selecting the Mission Bay site, GSW proposed an equally ambitious proposal on Piers 30-32 and Seawall Lot 330 in San Francisco. This prior proposal included an event center, hotel, residential, retail and maritime uses (including a San Francisco Fire Department fire boat station, water taxi stop and cruise ship berth), and substantial open space. The Piers 30-32 site would have required substantial repair and structural upgrades to the piers, which are currently in disrepair. This project presented a variety of environmental concerns to be addressed in an EIR, including short-term marine biological, hydrologic/water quality and noise impacts from the pile driving and other in-water construction; and long-term transportation effects from increased project traffic and associated air quality emissions. 34th America’s Cup and Cruise Terminal EIR, San Francisco, CA. Co- Project Manager. Paul recently managed the EIR for two projects: 1) the proposed 34th America’s Cup (AC34) - a series of international sailing events to be held in the San Francisco Bay in summer-fall 2012/2013; and 2) a new San Francisco Cruise Terminal. The AC34 project sponsors, the City of San Francisco and the America’s Cup Event Authority, propose a variety of facilities and services needed to support the events, including team bases, media operations, hospitality, and entertainment and spectator venues. A substantial number of temporary and permanent improvements would occur at several Port of San Francisco piers, as well as at Crissy Field, Marina Green, Fort Mason, Aquatic Park, Alcatraz and Fort Baker to accommodate the AC34 events. The site of the proposed America’s Cup Village (at Piers 27-29) would also ultimately serve as the site of the Port’s proposed modern new cruise terminal. The projects posed a number of unique environmental concerns, including potential marine biological and hydrologic/water quality impacts from the proposed installation of two miles of temporary floating docks, wave attenuators and other in-water construction; short-term air quality effects from AC34 event-related recreational, charter and team support boats, and long- term air quality emissions from cruise terminal cruise ships; substantial AC34 event-related traffic impacts; and potential environmental effects associated with long-term development at a number of Port properties. The EIR also addressed a variety of proposed implementation plans proposed to support the AC34 event, including a “People Plan” (transportation management), Parks Events Operations Plan, and Water and Air Traffic Plan. The EIR for this large project was completed in record time - 9 months. The Final EIR was certified by the City of San Francisco on December 15, 2011. Sonoma State University Concert Pavilion, Sonoma, CA. Project Director. Paul directed the completion of the environmental review for a proposed new concert pavilion at Sonoma State University as part of a minor revision to its Master Plan. The concert pavilion is the latest addition to the Green Music Center complex on the University campus. The project consists of a state-of- the-art outdoor venue to serve various musical and arts programs and accommodate a wide range of artists and performances, including symphonic music, opera and dance, and amplified genres of pop and rock. The proposed facilities include a large pavilion structure spanning a performance stage, LED video screens, sound/light towers, and fixed seating within a landscaped amphitheater. ESA completed an EIR addendum to the original Master Plan EIR to evaluate environmental effects of these proposed permanent facilities which would be developed instead of temporary facilities that were originally envisioned. Piedmont Skate Park Environmental Review, Piedmont, CA. Project Manager. Paul managed the completion of the environmental review for a proposed City-owned and -operated skate park in Piedmont. The proposed skate park was developed in response to a growing demand for a public skate facility in the City. Principal issues included geotechnical considerations (the facility is located adjacent to steep slopes), and traffic and pedestrian access issues. Mixed-Use Development Pacific Union College Ecovillage EIR, Napa County, CA. Project Manager. Paul managed the preparation an Administrative Draft EIR for a proposed “Ecovillage” in the unincorporated community of Angwin in Napa County, on land owned by the Pacific Union College (PUC). The project included 380-units of new housing, 72,500-square-feet of commercial uses, organic farm, and a variety of supporting recreation, transportation and infrastructure improvements. In addition, the EIR addressed development of 230 acres for potential vineyards/wineries, and preservation of over 1,100 acres of forest land. The project proposed a number of sustainable features, including but not limited to, upgrade of the PUC’s wastewater treatment plan to provide tertiary-treated water for agricultural irrigation and landscaping; springwater capture and rainwater harvesting; and sustainable technologies, including photovoltaic (PV) panels and geothermal heat pumps; the production of locally-farmed organic food; and implementation of an aggressive transportation demand management program. Further, a “synergistic” relationship was envisioned between the proposed Ecovillage and the PUC, where the Ecovillage would be served in part by the PUC’s cogeneration plant (which burns natural gas, generating electricity and providing steam for heating), and the PUC would benefit from the Ecovillage’s proposed PV system. Prior to publication of the Draft EIR, the Ecovillage project went on hold, pending resolution of funding and other project-related issues. Educational Facilities Sonoma State University Master Plan Revision EIR, Sonoma County, CA. Project Manager. Paul managed the preparation of an EIR for Sonoma State University for a major revision to its Master Plan. The University’s 219- acre campus is located immediately east of the city of Rohnert Park, in Sonoma County. The University proposed over 260,000 square feet of instructional expansion, a 100,000-square-foot music center and concert hall (Green Music Center), a 215,000-square-foot University Center, soccer stadium, and substantial increases in on-site student housing and parking. In addition, under the plan, a large parcel of land adjacent to the campus was planned to be acquired for future student housing. The principal issues associated with the project include traffic, circulation and parking, land use, and potential hydrologic and biological impacts to a seasonal creek that runs through the campus. ESA has also since completed several EIR Addendums for the University for Subsequent Minor Revisions to its Master Plan, including
Load more

Recommended publications
  • SAN FRANCISCO 2Nd Quarter 2014 Office Market Report
    SAN FRANCISCO 2nd Quarter 2014 Office Market Report Historical Asking Rental Rates (Direct, FSG) SF MARKET OVERVIEW $60.00 $57.00 $55.00 $53.50 $52.50 $53.00 $52.00 $50.50 $52.00 Prepared by Kathryn Driver, Market Researcher $49.00 $49.00 $50.00 $50.00 $47.50 $48.50 $48.50 $47.00 $46.00 $44.50 $43.00 Approaching the second half of 2014, the job market in San Francisco is $40.00 continuing to grow. With over 465,000 city residents employed, the San $30.00 Francisco unemployment rate dropped to 4.4%, the lowest the county has witnessed since 2008 and the third-lowest in California. The two counties with $20.00 lower unemployment rates are neighboring San Mateo and Marin counties, $10.00 a mark of the success of the region. The technology sector has been and continues to be a large contributor to this success, accounting for 30% of job $0.00 growth since 2010 and accounting for over 1.5 million sf of leased office space Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 2012 2012 2012 2013 2013 2013 2013 2014 2014 this quarter. Class A Class B Pre-leasing large blocks of space remains a prime option for large tech Historical Vacancy Rates companies looking to grow within the city. Three of the top 5 deals involved 16.0% pre-leasing, including Salesforce who took over half of the Transbay Tower 14.0% (delivering Q1 2017) with a 713,727 sf lease. Other pre-leases included two 12.0% full buildings: LinkedIn signed a deal for all 450,000 sf at 222 2nd Street as well 10.0% as Splunk, who grabbed all 182,000 sf at 270 Brannan Street.
    [Show full text]
  • Transbay Joint Powers Authority
    NEW ISSUE – Book-Entry Only RATINGS: See “RATINGS” In the opinion of Bond Counsel, under existing law and assuming compliance with the tax covenants described herein, and the accuracy of certain representations and certifications made by the Authority, interest on the 2020 Tax-Exempt Bonds is excluded from gross income for federal income tax purposes under Section 103 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”). Bond Counsel is also of the opinion that interest on the 2020 Tax-Exempt Bonds is not treated as a preference item in calculating the alternative minimum tax imposed under the Code. Interest on the Senior 2020A-T Bonds is not excluded from gross income for federal income tax purposes. Bond Counsel is further of the opinion that interest on the 2020 Bonds is exempt from personal income taxes of the State of California (the “State”) under present State law. See “2020 TAX-EXEMPT BONDS TAX MATTERS” and “SENIOR 2020A-T BONDS TAX MATTERS” in this Official Statement regarding certain other tax considerations. TRANSBAY JOINT POWERS AUTHORITY $189,480,000 $28,355,000 Senior Tax Allocation Bonds Senior Tax Allocation Bonds Series 2020A (Tax-Exempt) (Green Bonds) Series 2020A-T (Federally Taxable) (Green Bonds) $53,370,000 Subordinate Tax Allocation Bonds Series 2020B (Tax-Exempt) (Green Bonds) Dated: Date of Delivery Due: October 1, as shown on inside cover Bonds. The Transbay Joint Powers Authority (the “Authority”) is issuing the above-captioned bonds (the “Senior 2020A Bonds,” the “Senior 2020A-T Bonds,” and the “Subordinate 2020B Bonds” and, collectively, the “2020 Bonds”).
    [Show full text]
  • Experience Record As of 12.31.19
    EXPERIENCE RECORD AS OF 12.31.19 EXPERIENCE RECORD AS OF 12-31-19 (updated semi-annually) 165 PROJECTS IN DESIGN OR UNDER CONSTRUCTION SQUARE FEET Office 21,187,413 Living/Housing 24,432,720 Industrial/Logistics 12,088,486 Retail 2,389,141 Other 1,860,592 Total SF 61,958,352 886 COMPLETED DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS Office 152,078,268 Industrial/Logistics 41,910,950 Living/Housing 30,373,890 Retail 12,748,428 Hospitality 8,147,007 Sports Facilities 3,790,107 Medical/Biotechnological 3,472,366 Arts & Cultural 2,041,130 Educational 946,952 Other 3,057,553 Total SF 258,566,651 507 ACQUISITIONS Office 144,464,501 Industrial/Logistics 37,032,278 Retail 13,118,427 Living/Housing 3,325,174 Other 2,534,460 Total SF 200,474,840 539 PROPERTY/ASSET MANAGEMENT ASSIGNMENTS Hines Investment Management, 218 projects 98,100,000 Property-Level Services, 321 projects 134,300,000 Total SF 232,400,000 205 CURRENT HINES LOCATIONS (exclusive of facility management locations) U.S. Cities 106 Cities Outside of the United States 99 Cities with Facilities Mgmt. Assignments Only 454 Global Presence (Number of Cities) 659 Projects In Design and Under Construction Office 9 STEWART STREET 36-52 WELLINGTON 92 AVENUE OF THE AMERICAS Melbourne, Victoria, Australia Melbourne, Victoria, Australia New York, NY 55,208 sq. ft. office building 22,819 sq. ft. site planned for a heavy timber A development management project 10 stories creative office building 24,181 sq. ft. office building 14 stories 100 MILL 415 20TH STREET 561 GREENWICH Tempe, AZ Oakland, CA New York, NY 279,531 sq.
    [Show full text]
  • August 2015 San Francisco Residential
    SAN FRANCISCO RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT AUGUST 2015 REPORT CONTENTS click page numbers to be taken directly to page STATE OF DEVELOPMENT MARKET PERFORMANCE CURRENTLY SELLING Median $/SqFt Currently Year-Over-Year Month-Over-Month Mission Rock is San Francisco’s newest Luxe planned community to hit center stage. In New Condominium $1,196/SqFt 18% 1% November, San Francisco voters will de- Resale Condominium $1,021/SqFt 13% 0% 1650 Broadway at Van Ness | Pacific Heights cide the fate of an Initiative which calls for Status: 34 units available/0 in-contract/0 closed New Apartment $5.10/SqFt 7% n/a increasing allowable building heights up to Pre-sale: August 2015 Closings anticipated: Q1 2016 240 feet at the Development Site, locat- Project info: 34 units, 7-stories, 34 parking spaces ed just South of AT&T Park. In 2014, Voters NEW CONDOMINIUM PRICING & VOLUME passed Proposition B, requiring voter ap- Developer: Belrich Partners proval of height increases along Waterfront Architect: Forum Design Median Price & Closing Volume land owned by the Port. The November Interior Design: Edmonds + Lee Initiative proposes heights between 90 and $1,200,000 180 Features & Finishes: Marble tile and zinc facade, Floor- 160 240 feet, stepping down heights closer to $1,000,000 to-ceiling windows, Bay and Golden Gate views, Studio the Waterfront. Part of the Site currently 140 Most Recent Quarter Becker Cabinetry, Mobile kitchen islands, Caesarstone serves as the Giants’ parking lot, while the $800,000 120 countertops, Subzero refrigerators, Thermador ap- 100 Median: $1,000,000 $600,000 pliances, Uline wine coolers, Duravit and Hansgrohe rest consists of historic Piers in need of 80 fixtures, Victoria + Albert limestone soaking tubs, restoration.
    [Show full text]
  • The Mark Company Standard Monthly Reports San Francisco
    The Mark Company Standard Monthly Reports San Francisco May 2013 Contents Executive Summary Currently Selling Developments Resale Developments Pipeline Report TMC Disclaimer Notes 1) Currently Selling is defined as a new construction residential project selling for the first time or a project in which units have never been lived in as owner-occupied. 2) Resale is defined as a residential unit that has been sold at least once before and has previously been lived in. 3) This report covers Currently Selling residential developments with 20+ Market Rate units and Resale residential developments with 50+ Market Rate units located in Districts 7, 8 and 9. 4) Assume that projects located in the Currently Selling section are actively selling units unless noted otherwise. 5) Date On Market refers to the date the Sales Center opened. 6) Average Absorption is calculated from Date On Market through the first of the month prior to the date of the report. It accounts for units both in contract and closed. 7) Average Price/SF is calculated using only units where both square footage and price are known. Average Price/SF is defined as the average price divided by the average square footage. Averages are weighted averages. 8) Developments are considered Sold Out once the last Market Rate unit has closed OR there have been six months without a closing, all units are in contract and the Sales Center is closed (e.g. there is no active marketing). At that point, projects will be moved to the Resale section and tracked for resale closings. 9) Market Rate Units Available in the Pipeline Report refers to the estimated number of Market Rate units available for sale at the development (e.g.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 4: Affected Environment
    CHAPTER 4: AFFECTED ENVIRONMENT CHAPTER 4: AFFECTED ENVIRONMENT This chapter presents information on the environmental setting in the project area, organized by environmental issue category. The project study area encompasses the geographic area potentially most affected by the project. For most issues involving physical effects, this is the project footprint, or the area that would be disturbed for or replaced by new project facilities. This area includes the proposed downtown extension alignment from the existing Caltrain terminal and storage yard at Fourth and Townsend Streets to the Transbay Terminal, and it also includes the proposed redevelopment area surrounding the Transbay Terminal. Socioeconomic effects may be felt over a larger area. 4.1 LAND USE, WIND AND SHADOW The land use study area, as shown on Figure 4.1-1, includes areas near the Caltrain downtown extension Alternative routes as well as the proposed Transbay Redevelopment Area. The study area is bounded by Third, Fourth and Seventh Streets to the west, China Basin to the south, The Embarcadero and Steuart and Spear Streets to the east, and Howard and Market Streets to the north. Boundaries of the proposed Transbay Redevelopment Area (shown on Figure 4.1-1) encompass the Transbay Terminal and its immediate environs, except for some areas immediately south of the Transbay Terminal. 4.1.1 EXISTING LAND USES IN THE PROJECT AREA The proposed project area contains a mix of light industrial, warehousing/distribution, commercial office, retail, live-work, and residential uses and surface parking lots. Since the 1930s, the area has been dominated by regional transportation facilities associated with the Bay Bridge, including the Bridge structure and approaches, the Terminal Separator Structure (Bay Bridge ramps), the Transbay Terminal and ramp structures that connect to the Bridge, and the Embarcadero Freeway.
    [Show full text]
  • Experience Record As of 06.30.20
    EXPERIENCE RECORD AS OF 06.30.20 EXPERIENCE RECORD AS OF 06-30-20 (updated semi-annually) 165 PROJECTS IN DESIGN OR UNDER CONSTRUCTION SQUARE FEET Office 27,337,600 Living/Housing 23,650,145 Industrial/Logistics 8,582,028 Retail 2,408,363 Other 1,276,806 Total SF 63,254,942 907 COMPLETED DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS Office 152,612,708 Industrial/Logistics 45,403,143 Living/Housing 31,956,204 Retail 13,076,644 Hospitality 9,069,842 Sports Facilities 3,790,107 Medical/Biotechnological 3,472,366 Arts & Cultural 2,041,130 Educational 946,952 Other 3,292,088 Total SF 265,661,184 519 ACQUISITIONS Office 148,387,664 Industrial/Logistics 38,161,731 Retail 12,879,783 Living/Housing 4,243,631 Other 3,379,233 Total SF 207,052,042 576 PROPERTY/ASSET MANAGEMENT ASSIGNMENTS Hines Investment Management, 232 projects 102,788,044 Property-Level Services, 344 projects 143,798,904 Total SF 246,586,948 225 CURRENT HINES LOCATIONS (exclusive of facility management locations) U.S. Cities 118 Cities Outside of the United States 107 Cities with Facilities Mgmt. Assignments Only 450 Global Presence (Number of Cities) 675 Projects In Design and Under Construction Office 9 STEWART STREET 36-52 WELLINGTON 92 AVENUE OF THE AMERICAS Melbourne, Victoria, Australia Melbourne, Victoria, Australia New York, NY 55,208 sq. ft. office building 195,655 sq. ft. heavy timber creative office A development management project 10 stories building 24,181 sq. ft. office building 14 stories 100 MILL 415 20TH STREET 561 GREENWICH Tempe, AZ Oakland, CA New York, NY 279,531 sq.
    [Show full text]
  • Experience Record As of 12.31.20
    EXPERIENCE RECORD AS OF 12.31.20 EXPERIENCE RECORD AS OF 12-31-20 (updated semi-annually) 181 PROJECTS IN DESIGN OR UNDER CONSTRUCTION SQUARE FEET Living/Housing 34,762,687 Office 32,766,913 Industrial/Logistics 10,994,911 Retail 4,786,054 Other 3,020,516 Total SF 86,331,081 920 COMPLETED DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS Office 153,701,231 Industrial/Logistics 47,267,296 Living/Housing 34,025,738 Retail 13,150,871 Hospitality 9,069,842 Sports Facilities 3,790,107 Medical/Biotechnological 3,472,366 Arts & Cultural 2,041,130 Educational 946,952 Other 3,292,088 Total SF 270,757,621 538 ACQUISITIONS Office 151,830,062 Industrial/Logistics 42,773,788 Retail 12,727,154 Living/Housing 4,314,765 Other 3,398,846 Total SF 215,044,615 622 PROPERTY/ASSET MANAGEMENT ASSIGNMENTS Hines Investment Management, 263 projects 106,402,487 Property-Level Services, 359 projects 150,341,195 Total SF 256,743,682 240 CURRENT HINES LOCATIONS (exclusive of facility management locations) U.S. Cities 123 Cities Outside of the United States 117 Cities with Facilities Mgmt. Assignments Only 442 Global Presence (Number of Cities) 682 Projects In Design and Under Construction Office 9 STEWART STREET 36-52 WELLINGTON 92 AVENUE OF THE AMERICAS Melbourne, Victoria, Australia Melbourne, Victoria, Australia New York, NY 55,208 sq. ft. office building 195,655 sq. ft. heavy timber creative office A development management project 10 stories building 24,181 sq. ft. office building 14 stories 100 MILL 415 20TH STREET 561 GREENWICH Tempe, AZ Oakland, CA New York, NY 279,531 sq.
    [Show full text]
  • Building Inspections Performed 52353
    ANNUAL REPORT JULY 1, 2012 – JUNE 30, 2013 BUILDING INSPECTION COMMISSION Building Inspection Commission Page 3 DEPARTMENT OF BUILDING INSPECTION Director’s Office Page 14 ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES Finance Services Division Page 23 Payroll/Personnel Services Division Page 26 Records Management Division Page 28 PERMIT SERVICES Management Information Services Page 36 Permit Submittal and Issuance / Help Desk / Central Permit Bureau Page 38 Initial Permit Review Page 40 Permit Center, 2nd Floor Page 43 Plan Review Services Page 45 Energy/Mechanical Plan Review Page 50 Technical Services Division Page 52 INSPECTION SERVICES Building Inspection Division Page 56 Code Enforcement Section Page 60 Electrical Inspection Division Page 62 Housing Inspection Services Page 66 Plumbing Inspection Division Page 73 Inspection Services Projects Page 77 BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS Board of Examiners Page 85 DEPARTMENT OF BUILDING INSPECTION STAFF Page 86 DEPARTMENT OF BUILDING INSPECTION ANNUAL REPORT FY 2012 – 2013, JULY 1, 2012 – JUNE 30, 2013 Page 1 of 90 DEPARTMENT OF BUILDING INSPECTION PURPOSE To serve the City and County of San Francisco and the general public by ensuring the life and property within the City and County are safeguarded, and to provide a public forum for community involvement in that process. MISSION STATEMENT Under the direction and management of the seven-member citizen Building Inspection Commission, to oversee the effective, efficient, fair, and safe enforcement of the City and County of San Francisco’s Building, Housing, Plumbing, Electrical,
    [Show full text]
  • Icontact Contract Interest List.Xlsx
    iContact Contract Interest List 6.29.21 [email] [fname] [lname] [fax] [phone] [business] [address1] [address2] [city] [state] [zip] [contract] [email protected] Denny Monaghan 402.963.4089 503.597.1627 Silverstone Group 4000 Kruse Way Place Building #2Lake Oswego OR 97035 Actuarial_Services [email protected] Perrin Badini 703-243-2874 703-841-0626 Alcalde & Fay 2111 Wilson Boulevard Arlington VA 22201 All Contracts [email protected] Kim Davis 4159402464 4159402464 Allied Universal 545 Sansome St San Francisco CA 94111 All Contracts [email protected] allison lukanich 415-3920719 9169435228 Allied Universal Security Services 545 Sansome San Francisco CA 94111 All Contracts [email protected] chris Terry 4158464848 4158464848 Angel That's Devilicious 699 Lausanne Ave Daly City CA 94014 All Contracts [email protected] Corinne Kessler 9256916505 9256918500 Associated Right of Way Services, Inc. 2300 Contra Costa Blvd Suite 525 Pleasant Hill California 94523 All Contracts [email protected] Sejal Vakharia 630-628-0116 630-628-1966 Bearings and Industrial Supply Co. 431 Irmen Drive Addison IL 60101 All Contracts [email protected] Katie Eastham 916-978-4904 916-978-4900 Bender Rosenthal Inc. 4400 Auburn Boulevard Suite 102 Sacramento CA 95841 All Contracts [email protected] Bonnie Taylor 4152061711 4152061700 CMC Traffic Control Specialists 3450 3rd St Suite 3G San Francisco California 94124 All Contracts [email protected] Luis Gutierrez 2096070108 2096070108 Conti Corporation 2701 Del Paso Road Sacramento CA 95835 All Contracts [email protected] Kevin Blair 3102160800 4159266996 Desmond Marcello & Amster 1 Sansome St Suite 3500 San Francisco CA 94104 All Contracts [email protected] Katie DeLeuw 206-269-5046 510-368-7055 EnviroIssues 1633 Broadway Suite BW Oakland CA 94612 All Contracts [email protected] Claire Trine 650.853.0430 650.924.3048 Gachina Landscape Management 1130 O'Brien Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • April 2016 San Francisco Residential Development
    SAN FRANCISCO RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT APRIL 2016 NAVIGATION Click page numbers to be taken directly to page NEWS & MARKET CURRENTLY HIGHLIGHTS PERFORMANCE SELLING NEWS AND HIGHLIGHTS MARKET PERFORMANCE CURRENTLY SELLING Median $/SqFt Currently Year-Over-Year Month-Over-Month CURRENTLY SELLING... Luxe New Condominiump. $1,218/SqFt + 15% p. + 2% p. Nearly half of second phase is under contract. Price per square foot3 is 4 1650 Broadway at Van5 Ness | Pacific Heights Shipyard’s Resale Condominium $1,042/SqFt + 11% + 2% averaging approximately $760. The first phase averaged approximately $660 per Status: 34 units available/0 in-contract/0 closed square foot. New Apartment $5.10/SqFt + 7% N/A Pre-sale: August 2015 Closings anticipated: Q1 2016 Less than 100 units remain available at The Rockwell. Current absorption surpasses Project info: 34 units, 7-stories, 34 parking spaces 30 units a month. NEW CONDOMINIUM PRICING & VOLUME Developer: Belrich Partners Sales are expected to commence this month at the second phase of Onyx , consisting Architect: Forum Design of 21 condominiums. Median Price & Closing Volume Interior Design: Edmonds + Lee Features & Finishes: Marble tile and zinc facade, Floor- Closings have commenced at Lumina’s Plaza A. Price per square$1,200,000 foot is averaging 180 approximately $1,500. to-ceiling windows, Bay and Golden Gate views, Studio 160 Click development to be taken directly to page $1,000,000 Becker Cabinetry, Mobile kitchen islands, Caesarstone 140 Most Recent Quarter countertops, Subzero refrigerators, Thermador ap- $800,000 120 pliances, Uline wine coolers, Duravit and Hansgrohe ONE MISSION BAY THE HARRISON100 THEMedian: $1,000,000PACIFIC 388 FULTON 450 HAYES PROPOSED..
    [Show full text]
  • One Rincon Hill Residential Development
    One Rincon Hill Residential Development FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT San Francisco Planning Department Case No. 2003.0029E State Clearinghouse No. 2004062040 Draft EIR Publication Date: March 5, 2005 Draft EIR Public Hearing Date: April 14, 2005 Draft EIR Public Comment Period: March 5 to April 19, 2005 Final EIR Certifi cation Date: August 4, 2005 Harrison Street First Street on-ramp One Rincon Hill Residential Development FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT San Francisco Planning Department Case No. 2003.0029E State Clearinghouse No. 2004062040 Draft EIR Publication Date: March 5, 2005 Draft EIR Public Hearing Date: April 14, 2005 Draft EIR Public Comment Period: March 5 to April 19, 2005 Final EIR Certifi cation Date: August 4, 2005 Indicates material that is new or has been revised since publication of the Draft EIR. Harrison Street • First Street on-ramp • PLANNING COMMISSION CERTIFICATION MOTION File No.2003.0029E 425 First Street One Rincon Hill Assessor’s Block 3765 Lots 1,9 and 15 SAN FRANCISCO CITY PLANNING COMMISSION MOTION NO. 17075 ADOPTING FINDINGS RELATED TO THE CERTIFICATION OF A FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FOR A PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT, LOCATED AT 425 FIRST STREET, IN THE RINCON HILL PLAN AREA ASSESSOR’S BLOCK 3765, LOTS 1,9, AND 15. MOVED, That the San Francisco Planning Commission (hereinafter “Commission”) hereby CERTIFIES the Final Environmental Impact Report identified as case file No.2003.0029E, One Rincon Hill, also known as 425 First Street, (hereinafter “Project”) based upon the following findings: 1) The City and County of San Francisco, acting through the Planning Department (hereinafter “Department”) fulfilled all procedural requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (Cal.
    [Show full text]