DOCSLIB.ORG

APPENDIX D Natural Environment Technical Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
APPENDIX D Natural Environment Technical Report ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT APPENDIX D Natural Environment Technical Report SCARBOROUGH WATERFRONT PROJECT Toronto and Region Conservation Scarborough Waterfront Project Environmental Assessment Natural Environment Technical Report Final Report – January 2018 Prepared by: Toronto and Region Conservation 5 Shoreham Drive, Downsview, ON M3N 1S4 Natural Environment Report ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................ 1 1.1 Project Description ............................................................................................. 1 1.2 Project Areas ...................................................................................................... 2 1.2.1 Project Area ........................................................................................................... 2 1.2.2 Project Study Area ................................................................................................. 2 1.2.3 Regional Project Areas .......................................................................................... 2 2. BASELINE ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS .............................. 4 2.1 Historical Context ............................................................................................... 4 2.2 Terrestrial Habitat ............................................................................................... 5 2.2.1 Study Methodology ................................................................................................ 5 2.2.1.1 Desktop Study ............................................................................................................... 5 2.2.1.2 Field Study .................................................................................................................... 6 2.2.2 Project Area Terrestrial Habitat ............................................................................. 7 2.2.2.1 Terrestrial Habitat Types ............................................................................................... 7 2.2.2.2 Vegetation Communities ............................................................................................... 8 2.2.2.3 Vascular Plants ........................................................................................................... 21 2.2.3 Wildlife and Wildlife Habitat ................................................................................. 22 2.2.3.1 Wildlife Corridors ......................................................................................................... 22 2.2.4 Birds .................................................................................................................... 23 2.2.5 Mammals ............................................................................................................. 27 2.2.6 Herpetofauna ....................................................................................................... 27 2.2.7 Significant Natural Areas ..................................................................................... 28 2.2.7.1 Areas of Natural and Scientific Interest (ANSIs) .......................................................... 29 2.2.7.2 Environmentally Significant Areas (ESAs) ................................................................... 30 2.2.7.3 Provincially Significant Wetlands (PSWs) .................................................................... 35 2.3 Aquatic Habitat and Fish Community ............................................................... 35 2.3.1 Connected Lake Ontario Ecosystem Zones ........................................................ 36 2.3.1.1 Nearshore Zone .......................................................................................................... 36 2.3.1.2 Offshore Zone ............................................................................................................. 36 2.3.1.3 Interconnectedness ..................................................................................................... 37 2.3.2 Aquatic Habitat Types .......................................................................................... 37 2.3.3 Fish Community ................................................................................................... 43 2.3.3.1 Fish Community Data Collection Methodology ............................................................ 44 2.3.3.2 Fish Community Data Analysis Methodology .............................................................. 48 2.3.3.3 Fish Community Data Analysis Results ....................................................................... 49 2.4 Species at Risk (SAR) ...................................................................................... 64 2.4.1 SAR Recognition and Protection ......................................................................... 64 SCARBOROUGH WATERFRONT PROJECT Toronto and Region Conservation i Natural Environment Report ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT 2.4.2 Plant SAR ............................................................................................................ 66 2.4.3 Terrestrial SAR .................................................................................................... 66 2.4.4 Fish SAR ............................................................................................................. 67 3. DEVELOPMENT OF ALTERNATIVES ........................................ 68 4. COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF ALTERNATIVES ................ 68 4.1 Criteria: Extent of Aquatic Habitat Enhanced or Diminished ............................ 69 4.1.1 Indicator: Ability to Increase Shoreline Morphology by Increasing Shoreline Irregularity ............................................................................................................ 69 4.1.2 Indicator: Ability to Increase Shoreline Substrate Type Diversity ......................... 69 4.1.3 Indicator: Potential for Aquatic Habitat Loss or Modification ................................ 70 4.2 Criteria: Extent of Terrestrial Habitat Attributes Enhanced or Diminished ....... 71 4.2.1 Indicator: Potential to Create Appropriate Land-Water Interface ......................... 71 4.2.2 Indicator: Impact to Vegetation Communities of Concern .................................... 72 4.3 Criteria: Potential for Impact on Terrestrial SAR .............................................. 72 4.3.1 Indicator: Potential Effects to Habitat for Bank Swallow ...................................... 72 4.4 Natural Environment Objective: Results for Comparative Evaluation .............. 73 4.4.1 West Segment ..................................................................................................... 73 4.4.2 Central Segment .................................................................................................. 75 4.4.3 East Segment ...................................................................................................... 77 5. DETAILED ASSESSMENT OF PREFERRED ALTERNATIVE ... 80 5.1 Overview of Preferred Alternative .................................................................... 80 5.1.1 Terrestrial Habitat ................................................................................................ 80 5.1.1.1 West Segment............................................................................................................. 83 5.1.1.2 Central Segment ......................................................................................................... 85 5.1.1.3 East Segment ............................................................................................................. 85 5.1.2 Aquatic Habitat .................................................................................................... 88 5.1.2.1 West Segment............................................................................................................. 93 5.1.2.2 Central Segment ......................................................................................................... 93 5.1.2.3 East Segment ............................................................................................................. 94 5.2 Evaluation Criteria and Effects Assessment .................................................... 94 5.2.1 Criteria: Ability to Minimize Effects Associated with Construction Works, Construction Access and Laydown Areas ........................................................... 94 5.2.1.1 Indicator: Alteration and Loss of Aquatic Habitat ......................................................... 94 5.2.1.2 Indicator: Disruptions to Fish and Fish Habitat ............................................................ 95 5.2.1.3 Indicator: Nuisance Effects on Wildlife ........................................................................ 97 5.2.1.4 Indicator: Removal and Disturbance of Terrestrial Habitat ........................................... 99 5.2.2 Criteria: Ability to Provide Functional Nearshore Open Coast Aquatic Habitat .. 101 5.2.2.1 Indicator: Ability to Increase Shoreline Morphology by Increasing Shoreline Irregularity ................................................................................................................. 101 5.2.2.2 Indicator: Ability to Increase Shoreline Substrate Diversity ........................................ 102 SCARBOROUGH WATERFRONT PROJECT Toronto and Region Conservation ii Natural Environment Report ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT 5.2.2.3 Indicator: Ability to Provide Habitat for Various Life Stages ......................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 3. Description of the Potentially Affected Environment
    ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT 3. Description of the Potentially Affected Environment The purpose of Chapter 3 is to present an overview of the environment potentially affected by the SWP to create familiarity with issues to be addressed and the complexity of the environment likely to be affected by the Project. All aspects of the environment within the Project Study Area (see Figure 2- 1 in Chapter 2) relevant to the Project and its potential effects have been described in this chapter. The chapter is divided into three sections which capture different components of the environment: 1. Physical environment: describes the coastal and geotechnical processes acting on the Project Study Area; 2. Natural environment: describes terrestrial and aquatic habitat and species; and, 3. Socio-economic environment: describes existing and planned land use, land ownership, recreation, archaeology, cultural heritage, and Aboriginal interests. The description of the existing environment is based on the information from a number of studies, which have been referenced in the relevant sections. Additional field surveys were undertaken where appropriate. Where applicable, future environmental conditions are also discussed. For most components of the environment, existing conditions within the Project Area or Project Study Area are described. Where appropriate, conditions within the broader Regional Study Area are also described. 3.1 Physical Environment Structures and property within slopes, valleys and shorelines may be susceptible to damage from natural processes such as erosion, slope failures and dynamic beaches. These processes become natural hazards when people and property locate in areas where they normally occur (MNR, 2001). Therefore, understanding physical natural processes is vital to developing locally-appropriate Alternatives in order to meet Project Objectives.
    [Show full text]
  • Unsettling 2 3
    Unsettling 2 3 Bendale neighbourhood Unsettling Basil AlZeri Lori Blondeau Duorama Terrance Houle Lisa Myers Curated by Bojana Videkanic Cover: Scarborough Bluffs 6 7 Highland Creek Contents 12 (Un)settled Histories Bojana Videkanic 36 Nourishment as Resistance Elwood Jimmy 40 Sub/urban/altern Cosmopolitanism: Unsettling Scarborough’s Cartographic Imaginary Ranu Basu 54 Scarborough Cannot Be Boxed In Shawn Micallef 88 List of Works 92 Bios 98 Acknowledgements 10 11 Gatineau Hydro Corridor 13 I am moved by my love for human life; (Un)settled Histories by the firm conviction that all the world Bojana Videkanic must stop the butchery, stop the slaughter. I am moved by my scars, by my own filth to re-write history with my body to shed the blood of those who betray themselves To life, world humanity I ascribe To my people . my history . I address my vision. —Lee Maracle, “War,” Bent Box To unsettle means to disturb, unnerve, and upset, but could also mean to offer pause for thinking otherwise about an issue or an idea. From May to October 2017, (Un)settled, a six-month-long curatorial project, took place at Guild Park and Gardens in south Scarborough, and at the Doris McCarthy Gallery at the University of Toronto Scarborough (where the exhibition was titled Unsettling), showcasing the work of Lori Blondeau, Lisa Myers, Duorama, Basil AlZeri, and Terrance Houle. The project was a multi-pronged collaboration between myself, the Department of Fine Arts at the University of Waterloo, the Doris McCarthy Gallery, Friends of the Guild, the Waterloo Archives, the 7a*11d International Performance Art Festival’s special project 7a*md8, curated by Golboo Amani and Francisco-Fernando Granados, and the Landmarks Project.
    [Show full text]
  • Guild Park and Gardens Monument Walk
    Councillor Paul Ainslie OFFICIAL RIBBON CUTTING BY COUNCILLOR PAUL AINSLIE Toronto City Councillor October 3, 2015 Scarborough East, Ward 43 Chair - Government Management Committee 416-392-4008 GUILD PARK Welcome to the Official Ribbon Cutting of AND GARDENS “Monument Walk” MONUMENT Guild Park and Gardens WALK Saturday October 3, 2015 10:00 a.m. Guild Park and Gardens 201 Guildwood Pkwy Courtesy of Barbara Eguchi, Eguchi Associates Landscape Architects The "Monument Walk" highlights many significant artefacts that Rosa and Spencer Clark collected. Featured at the west side of the park near the Osterhaut Cabin the monuments were placed in a strategic manner by a landscape architect to provide visitors with a wonderful experience; leading to the back gardens to view Lake Ontario, the Greek Theatre and additional monuments. Finial Column (Rosedale Residence) Origin of Monument: Origin of Monument: Provincial Paper Ltd. c. 1930 Rosedale Residence demolished Materials: for the extension of Mt. Pleasant Limestone Road to Jarvis Street 2 Columns Materials: Limestone column and capital on concrete foundation Mantle Column Origin of Monument: Sherbourne Street Townhouses Fredrick Banting's House at 46 Bedford Road (living room); house Origin of Monument: built in 1928 and demolished in Sherbourne Street Townhouses c. 1966. 1870 demolished c. 1950 Materials: 2 Columns Sandstone fireplace on a solid limestone base Materials: Polished orange granite column, Keystone red sandstone base and capital Origin of Monument: Ionic Capital From Medical Building
    [Show full text]
  • HERITAGE ADVISORY COMMITTEE AGENDA Tuesday October 13, 2020 7:00 PM VIRTUAL MEETING Council Chambers - 111 Sandiford Drive
    TOWN OF WHITCHURCH - STOUFFVILLE HERITAGE ADVISORY COMMITTEE AGENDA Tuesday October 13, 2020 7:00 PM VIRTUAL MEETING Council Chambers - 111 Sandiford Drive As the Municipal Offices (111 Sandiford Drive) are now closed to the public, residents may listen to the meeting live online at townofws.ca/cmlivestream. The audio link will be available 5 minutes before the meeting is expected to start. Please contact the Committee Coordinator at 905-640-1910 x 2236, or [email protected] to: submit written comments, register to provide verbal comments by attending the meeting electronically, or obtain further information regarding the agenda items or the meeting process. Anyone wishing to submit comments during the meeting may call in at 905- 640-1910 x 2222 or email [email protected], and the comments will form part of the public record. Chair: Councillor Kroon Page 1. CALL TO ORDER 2. INTRODUCTION OF ADDENDUM ITEMS 3. CONFIRMATION OF AGENDA 4. DECLARATIONS 5. ADOPTION OF MINUTES 3 - 7 1. Minutes 6. CONSIDERATION OF ITEMS 8 - 22 1. Whitchurch-Stouffville Heritage Awards: Suggested Format 23 - 30 2. Heritage Conservation District: Discussion Item 3. Official Plan Stakeholder Advisory Committee: Update by Dean Horner 31 - 33 4. Heritage Advisory Committee Site Visits 7. CORRESPONDENCE Heritage Advisory Committee Agenda October 13, 2020 34 - 38 1. Ontario Barn Preservation 8. MOTION TO ADJOURN Page 2 of 38 TOWN OF WHITCHURCH - STOUFFVILLE HERITAGE ADVISORY COMMITTEE MINUTES Monday, September 14, 2020 7:00 pm Virtual Meeting (Council Chambers, 111 Sandiford Drive) Chair: Councillor Kroon The meeting of the Heritage Advisory Committee was held on the above date and time.
    [Show full text]
  • Guild Park and Gardens Look-Out Feasibility Study
    GUILD PARK AND GARDENS: LOOK OUT Structural Feasibility Options Study January 30, 2018 1 Guild Park and Gardens: Look Out | Structural Feasibility Options Study ENTUITIVE TABLE OF CONTENTS 2 INTRODUCTION 3 OPTION 1A 4 OPTION 1B 5 OPTION 1C 6 OPTION 2A 7 OPTION 2B 8 OPTION C 2 Guild Park and Gardens: Look Out | Structural Feasibility Options Study ENTUITIVE INTRODUCTION Entuitive was retained by the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority to carry out a structural feasibility study of a look out structure in the park. Taking in to account slope stability analysis performed by Terraprobe Inc., various concepts taking in to account the future projected erosion of the bluffs has been used to develop several possible options of a structure that provides a viewing platform and aims to minimize impact to the existing environmental surroundings. The historic Guild Inn was recently renovated and expanded opening opportunity to enhance the park and offer a new experience to users by allowing for a look out station offering natural views of the surroundings of the Scarborough Bluffs and to Lake Ontario. The proposed look out sites are located in southern GUILDWOOD PARKWAY vicinity of the Guildwood Parkway overlooking the Scarborough Bluffs. Two site locations have been identified as feasible locations for the lookout as indicated on the drawing. This feasibility report presents four, concept level, 50m structural options of the lookout. In all cases, it 100m is assumed that heavy construction loads will remain a minimum of 6m away from the current 200m CULVERT crest position to provide for safe working area, and minimize the need for slope stabilization LIVINGSTON ROAD LIVINGSTON during construction itself.
    [Show full text]
  • Guild Park & Horticulture Plans
    GUILD PARK & GARDENS horticulture plan | 2018 1 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The Horticulture Plan for Guild Park and Gardens reflects the input of the community as well as senior staff from the City of Toronto and TRCA who advised the team with respect to each component of the Plan. CITY OF TORONTO ADVISORY TEAM Brendan McKee - PF&R, Horticulture - Project Coordinator, Landscape Architect Gord Bacon - PF&R, Parks - Scarborough District, General Supervisor Christopher Martin - PF&R, Parks - Scarborough District, Supervisor (Ward 43) Kristen Vincent - PF&R, Urban Forestry - Natural Resource Specialist Cara Webster - PF&R, Urban Forestry, Urban Forest Renewal, Tree Nursery & Natural Resource Management - Supervisor Nicole Bowles - PF&R - Leadhand Horticulturist Ruthanne Henry - PF&R, Parks Development and Capital Projects - Senior Coordinator Barb McLean - Economic Development & Culture, Capital Assets Jo-Ann Pynn - Economic Development & Culture, Capital Assets Jan Donovan - Economic Development & Culture, Capital Assets Julie Frost - Economic Development & Culture, Arts & Culture Services -Senior Arts Consultant CONSULTING TEAM - THE PLANNING PARTNERSHIP Michael Ormston-Holloway Tyler Allen Bradt Jennifer Williamson CONTENTS INTRODUCTION 5 vision for the future 6 purpose 7 PLAN CONTEXT 9 history 11 project context 13 study methodology 23 inventory & analysis 24 consultation 32 issues 34 inspiration 38 RECOMMENDATIONS 45 vision 47 principles & objectives 50 landscape plan 54 key elements 60 planting strategy 68 detailed planting plans 80 planting lists 86 construction practices 100 maintenance 102 PHASING & IMPLEMENTATION 107 implementation 108 roles & responsibilities 112 costing 115 PLANT CATALOGUE 117 Left - The existing main garden walk, looking north towards the Guild Inn Estate. SECTION 1 : introduction GUILD PARK & GARDENS horticulture plan | 2018 5 vision for the future “A park like no other, Guild Park and Gardens is a premiere destination for local residents Guild Park & Gardens is and visitors from the Greater Toronto Area and beyond.
    [Show full text]
  • Making Toronto a Place Where Business and Culture Thrive
    Making Toronto a place where business and culture thrive Economic Development & Culture Division Annual Report 2016 toronto.ca/business | toronto.ca/culture Message from the General Manager In 2016, the Economic Development & Culture Division (EDC) continued its work to make Toronto a place EDC’s Business Improvement Area program continued to facilitate streetscape improvements, leveraging where business and culture thrive. more than $40 million in private sector funding for commercial area revitalization, a 35:1 ratio for every dollar the City spent. On the economic front, we facilitated investment in projects that resulted in a projected $675 million in investment value, the construction or renovation of 4.95 million square feet of floor space, and an Our film office provided support for 1,411 screen-based productions that employed 30,000 people estimated 13,800 jobs retained or attracted to the city. The City’s $24 per capita investment in culture also and generated $2 billion in film, television, digital and commercials production investment in 2016 paid dividends, as more than 17 million people attended over 30,000 City-funded cultural events in the city. – a record-breaking year. And though it’s still early days for the music sector program, the launch of the Toronto Music Directory was yet another step in making Toronto an internationally recognized Music City. These statistics, as notable as they are, reflect only a portion of the full scope of work undertaken across EDC’s program areas to accelerate Toronto’s economy and ensure a thriving environment for culture. Toronto’s historical museums and heritage sites play an important role in remembering and celebrating the Significant strides were made in all portfolios in 2016.
    [Show full text]
  • More Visitors, Improvements Ahead for Guild Park (Cont’D)
    Guildwood Village news & views edition 4/4 The official publication of your Guildwood Village Community Association fall 2017 destination for private gatherings. Park visits will keep increasing as more More Visitors, Improvements people discover this unique destination – where art meets nature. According to Heritage Toronto, Guild Ahead for Guild Park Park is now the second-most popular walking tour among its 60 city tours. soggy summer couldn’t keep and special Canada 150 event; Installing the first Toronto Heritage people away from Guild Park & • the month-long production of She plaque at Guild Park in 2018 will bring Gardens. Stoops to Conquer by the GFT at the more attention. So will having Guild Park ADespite the rainy weather and Greek Theatre; serve as a public access point for the new a disappointing number of event • Toronto Arts’ presentation of Othello; $170-million Scarborough Waterfront cancellations, Guild Park has welcomed • the park’s first-ever native plant give- Trail, now underway by the Toronto & 20 per cent more visitors so far this year away; and Region Conservation Authority. for activities organized by the Guildwood • the series of walking tours that highlight Knowing how many people come to Village Community Association (GVCA), the history and art legacy of the site. any park is important. It affects the size Guild Renaissance Group (GRG), Guild To compare, in past years annual and type of public facilities at the site. Festival Theatre (GFT) and Friends of attendance for volunteer-led events The number of visitors also determines Guild Park. averaged about 10,000. how much money is spent to improve, About 12,000 people came to the 88- Excluded are all the people who operate and bring activities to a park.
    [Show full text]
  • November 2015, Issue 64
    November 2015 Volume 15 Issue 64 Facebook: Councillor Paul Ainslie www.paulainslie.com Twitter: @cllrainslie Dear Friends, As we ready for the winter season please make your surroundings safe for the anticipated conditions, section 20 of this report offers suggested tips for severe weather. Also check on your neighbours who may need assistance. Being a good neighbor contributes to the wellbeing of the community increasing its quality of life. If you or your neighbours require assistance please contact my office at 416-396-7222, we can guide you to services. Keeping road safety in mind, I am making available for pick up the City's "Please Slow Down" Signs at my constituency office located on the 2nd floor of the Scarborough Civic Centre, 150 Borough Road. The signs were printed by Transportation Services who wanted to address the significant increase in pedestrian and cyclist collisions during the Fall season; they serve as an effective reminder that speed is a local issue, not all drivers will necessarily slow down. Please be continue to pay attention when crossing the road or when your children are playing outside. If you would like a sign please call my office 416-392-4008 to schedule a time for pick up. I am pleased to announce that all the approvals for the Bickford Residence (Inn) renovations and extension are now complete and the project is moving forward. On Tuesday November 17, 2015, City of Toronto staff of the Economic Development and Culture Division will host a meeting to provide an overall update on the Guild Park and Gardens site.
    [Show full text]
  • Guild Park & Horticulture Plans
    SECTION 2 : plan context GUILD PARK & GARDENS horticulture plan | 2018 9 10 GUILD PARK & GARDENS horticulture plan | 2018 history The Guild Park and Gardens has a long and illustrious history, which began with the parceling of land tracts for distribution to Loyalists following the American Revolutionary War. One of the property’s earliest owners, William Ousterhout, while never having lived on the site, has come to be associated with the log cabin that bears his name. The Ousterhout Log Cabin has been dated back to approximately 1850 and persists to this day as one of four designated heritage buildings on the Park site. The property changed hands many times in the 19th and early 20th century. In 1914, owner General Bickford, created the Ranelagh Park View of Bickford House and an event tent, country estate on the site and built the Bickford House as a summer 2000 resort. The estate house formed the nucleus for the Guild Inn, which is now a designated cultural heritage building. In 1932 Rosa Hewetson purchased the over 450 acre property, where she married Spencer Clark. The same year, she and Spencer formed the Guild of All Arts. Inspired by the arts and crafts community at Roycroft, New York State, ‘The Guild of All Arts’ started as a social contribution in the depression years, providing a home and a forum for artists and artisans, where their work was created and collected for the enjoyment of many. There is still a significant public art collection on the site. The Guild of All Arts was active from 1932 until 1942 and, after the war, from 1947 until Spencer Clark’s death in the 1980s.
    [Show full text]
  • March 2020 - Volume 20, Issue 109 Outreach - Value – Input Making Our Community Thrive
    March 2020 - Volume 20, Issue 109 Outreach - Value – Input Making Our Community Thrive Dear Scarborough-Guildwood Neighbours, I would like to thank everyone who attended my Community Town Hall Meeting at Cedarbrook Community Centre on Tuesday February 18th. Residents play a vital role in our community and I appreciate the time people out of their busy days to come and speak with me, and our neighbours. Topics discussed at this Town Hall included community safety, traffic concerns, community resources available to the neighbourhood. Staff from Toronto Police Services 43 Division distributed information such as the non- emergency number, how to report issues online, and utilizing Toronto Police Service's website portal to view statistics and events in every neighbourhood. The police called attention to utilizing the non-emergency number 416-808-2222 to report any out of the ordinary observations in your community as it assists if issues develop. Contacting the non-emergency line is important, I cannot stress enough that calling the line will bring more resources to Scarborough-Guildwood as the number of calls and data on the issue is used to determine where to place officers and resources. Toronto Police Services now has online services for everyone to use to report any incident online through its Citizen Online Report Entry (CORE) unit. Visit the Ward Wide Update section of this letter for more details. Toronto Public Health (TPH) is monitoring additional positive cases of COVID-19 in Toronto. TPH continues to work with their provincial and federal health colleagues. At this time the virus is not circulating locally, however given the global circumstances, TPH is actively working with City and health partners to plan for this potentially to take place.
    [Show full text]
  • APPENDIX L9 Public Comments
    ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT APPENDIX L9 Public Comments Table of Contents Public Comments Table .................................................................................... L9-1 SCARBOROUGH WATERFRONT PROJECT Toronto and Region Conservation ID # Date Source Comments Theme(s) 1 September 12, 2015 Shoreline Tour I guess this is a positive comment but could have listened to more more tours throughout the year Access Comment Form Public Access – how to manage an increase in the # of people accessing the Bluffs. Consultation + Parking – better bike access Parking Traffic 2 September 12, 2015 Shoreline Tour Access by car Access Comment Form 3 September 12, 2015 Shoreline Tour I like the emphasis on finding solutions to erosion that are more “natural” or less invasive, and that accommodate Access Comment Form human AND animal / plant / insect life Ecology Making the trail safe for hiking, but still educating people about how not to disturb the natural / wildlife in the area. Erosion 4 September 12, 2015 Shoreline Tour A lot of work to put on. need to promote widely so public awareness is present for full consultation Access Comment Form Promoting widely to obtain maximum exposure + awareness Accessibility Biking trails + accessibility (AODA) Consultation 5 September 12, 2015 Shoreline Tour Hiking Trail Access Comment Form 6 September 12, 2015 Shoreline Tour Connect it with Bluffers Comment on Comment Form Alternative 7 September 12, 2015 Shoreline Tour Better access to the waterfront would be great Access Comment Form 8 September 12, 2015
    [Show full text]