Making Toronto a Place Where Business and Culture Thrive
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Neighbourhood Equity Scores for Toronto Neighbourhoods and Recommended Neighbourhood Improvement Areas
Appendix B Neighbourhood Equity Scores for Toronto Neighbourhoods and Recommended Neighbourhood Improvement Areas All Scores are out of a maximum 100 points: the lower the Score, the higher the level of total overall inequities faced by the neighbourhood. Neighbourhoods with Scores lower than the Neighbourhood Equity Benchmark of 42.89 face serious inequities that require immediate action. Neighbourhoods marked with "*" in the Rank column were designated by Council as Priority Neighbourhood Areas for Investment (PNIs) under the 2005 Strategy. For neighbourhoods marked with a "+" in the Rank column, a smaller portion of the neighbourhood was included in a larger Priority Neighbourhood Areas for Investment designated by Council under the 2005 Strategy. Neighbourhood Recommended Rank Neighbourhood Number and Name Equity Score as NIA 1* 24 Black Creek 21.38 Y 2* 25 Glenfield-Jane Heights 24.39 Y 3* 115 Mount Dennis 26.39 Y 4 112 Beechborough-Greenbrook 26.54 Y 5 121 Oakridge 28.57 Y 6* 2 Mount Olive-Silverstone-Jamestown 29.29 Y 7 5 Elms-Old Rexdale 29.54 Y 8 72 Regent Park 29.81 Y 9 55 Thorncliffe Park 33.09 Y 10 85 South Parkdale 33.10 Y 11* 61 Crescent Town 33.21 Y 12 111 Rockcliffe-Smythe 33.86 Y 13* 139 Scarborough Village 33.94 Y 14* 21 Humber Summit 34.30 Y 15 28 Rustic 35.40 Y 16 125 Ionview 35.73 Y 17* 44 Flemingdon Park 35.81 Y 18* 113 Weston 35.99 Y 19* 22 Humbermede 36.09 Y 20* 138 Eglinton East 36.28 Y 21 135 Morningside 36.89 Y Staff report for action on the Toronto Strong Neighbourhoods Strategy 2020 1 Neighbourhood Recommended -
Tall Buildings: up up and Away?
expect the best Tall Buildings: Up Up and Away? by Marc Kemerer Originally published in Blaneys on Building (April 2011) There has been much debate about tall buildings (buildings over 12 storeys in height) in Toronto in the past number of years particularly due to the decreasing availability of development land, and the province and municipal forces on intensification – but how tall is too tall and where should tall buildings be permitted? Marc Kemerer is a municipal As we have reported previously, the City of Toronto continues to review proposals for tall towers partner at Blaney McMurtry , against its Tall Buildings Guidelines which set out standards for podiums, setbacks between sister with significant experience in towers and the like. Some of those Guidelines were incorporated into the City’s new comprehensive all aspects of municipal planning and development. zoning by-law (under appeal and subject to possible repeal by City Council - see the Planning Updates section of this issue) while the Guidelines themselves were renewed last year by City Marc may be reached directly Council for continued use in design review. at 416.593.2975 or [email protected]. Over the last couple of years the City has embarked on the “second phase” of its tall buildings review through the “Tall Buildings Downtown Project”. In connection with this phase, the City has recently released the study commissioned by the City on this topic entitled: “Tall Buildings: Inviting Change in Downtown Toronto” (the “Study”). The Study focused on three issues: where should tall buildings be located; how high should tall buildings be; and how should tall buildings behave in their context. -
3. Description of the Potentially Affected Environment
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT 3. Description of the Potentially Affected Environment The purpose of Chapter 3 is to present an overview of the environment potentially affected by the SWP to create familiarity with issues to be addressed and the complexity of the environment likely to be affected by the Project. All aspects of the environment within the Project Study Area (see Figure 2- 1 in Chapter 2) relevant to the Project and its potential effects have been described in this chapter. The chapter is divided into three sections which capture different components of the environment: 1. Physical environment: describes the coastal and geotechnical processes acting on the Project Study Area; 2. Natural environment: describes terrestrial and aquatic habitat and species; and, 3. Socio-economic environment: describes existing and planned land use, land ownership, recreation, archaeology, cultural heritage, and Aboriginal interests. The description of the existing environment is based on the information from a number of studies, which have been referenced in the relevant sections. Additional field surveys were undertaken where appropriate. Where applicable, future environmental conditions are also discussed. For most components of the environment, existing conditions within the Project Area or Project Study Area are described. Where appropriate, conditions within the broader Regional Study Area are also described. 3.1 Physical Environment Structures and property within slopes, valleys and shorelines may be susceptible to damage from natural processes such as erosion, slope failures and dynamic beaches. These processes become natural hazards when people and property locate in areas where they normally occur (MNR, 2001). Therefore, understanding physical natural processes is vital to developing locally-appropriate Alternatives in order to meet Project Objectives. -
Toronto Walking Strategy Walkability in Action
W CREATING SPACES AND PLACES FOR PEDESTRIANS: STRATEGY ACTIONS 4 DESIGN GATHERING PLACES 4 SUPPORT A BEAUTIFUL PUBLIC REALM FOR PEDESTRIANS • 5.4: Continue to work with all of Toronto's communi- • 5.1: Develop, implement and evaluate a variety of ties to design and implement small and large-scale pedestrian street design options including full-time neighbourhood beautification projects. and occasional pedestrian streets. • 5.5: Develop design standards for attractive and • 5.2: Investigate innovative street designs such as functional transit waiting areas to provide a positive shared-streets, where appropriate, so that neighbour- and enjoyable experience for transit customers. hood streets can serve as important community • 5.6: Build public squares and plazas at key intersec- places while providing local transportation access. tions in Toronto through the development review • 5.3: Support regular, community-led pedestrian process, public-private partnerships and by converting street events by developing a "how-to" guide and under-utilized sections of roadways and public space. promotional materials. • 5.7 Review current boulevard parking permit pro- grams and investigate opportunities for transforming paved boulevards to attractive public spaces. Yonge-Dundas Square PHOTO BY SAM JAVANROUki 32 CITY OF TORONTO WALKING STRATEGY WALKABILITY IN ACTION CIVIC IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM The Civic Improvement Program is intended to guide decisions regarding capital investment to improve public spaces including streets, plazas, parks, and public buildings. The program enhances ongoing capital programs in other City divisions. Civic improvement projects can be grouped under three general themes: PLACES: looks for opportunities to create outdoor "rooms' or dis- tinctive "locations" in the public realm that enhance the quality of the pedestrian environment. -
An Exploration of Travel Behaviour Change After the Implementation of Cycle Tracks: a Case Study of Sherbourne Street in Toronto
AN EXPLORATION OF TRAVEL BEHAVIOUR CHANGE AFTER THE IMPLEMENTATION OF CYCLE TRACKS: A CASE STUDY OF SHERBOURNE STREET IN TORONTO by Raymond Andrew Ziemba, Bachelor of Arts, University of Toronto, 2012 A Major Research Paper presented to Ryerson University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Planning in Urban Development Toronto, Ontario, Canada, 2015 © Raymond Ziemba 2015* Author’s Declaration for Electronic Submission of a MRP I hereby declare that I am the sole author of this MRP. This is a true copy of the MRP, including any required final revisions. I authorize Ryerson University to lend this MRP to other institutions or individuals for the purpose of scholarly research. I further authorize Ryerson University to reproduce this MRP by photocopying or by other means, in total or in part, at the request of other institutions or individuals for the purpose of scholarly research. I understand that my MRP may be made electronically available to the public. II AN EXPLORATION OF TRAVEL BEHAVIOUR CHANGE AFTER THE IMPLEMENATION OF CYCLE TRACKS IN TORONTO © Raymond Andrew Ziemba, 2015 Master of Planning in Urban Development Ryerson University ABSTRACT With the growing environmental, health and economic concerns associated with automobiles, municipalities are investing in cycling infrastructure. These new infrastructures are often assumed to facilitate a mode substitution effect, encouraging users to switch to active transportation. This study explores the impact of cycle tracks on travel behavior. A case study was conducted on Sherbourne Street, in the city of Toronto, that was redeveloped in 2012 to include cycle tracks, i.e., separated bicycle lanes. -
NAVIGATING a CAREER in the ARTS for NEWCOMERS Findings and Recommendations March 2021
NAVIGATING A CAREER IN THE ARTS FOR NEWCOMERS Findings and Recommendations March 2021 SUMMARY OF CONTENTS Message from WorkInCulture’s Executive Director ................................................................... 3 Acknowledgements ................................................................................................................... 4 1. About the Project, Navigating a Career in the Arts for Newcomers ....................................... 7 1.1 Key questions explored ............................................................................................................. 8 1.2 Assessment methods and approach ........................................................................................ 9 1.3 Advisory Committee Members ................................................................................................. 9 2. The Toronto Arts and Culture Ecosystem for New Canadian Arts Professionals ................. 10 2.1 Terms Used by the Arts and Culture Sector .......................................................................... 10 2.2 The Newcomer Spectrum ........................................................................................................ 12 2.3 The Settlement Context........................................................................................................... 14 3. What We Heard .................................................................................................................... 15 3.1 From New Canadian Arts Professionals Themselves ......................................................... -
Unsettling 2 3
Unsettling 2 3 Bendale neighbourhood Unsettling Basil AlZeri Lori Blondeau Duorama Terrance Houle Lisa Myers Curated by Bojana Videkanic Cover: Scarborough Bluffs 6 7 Highland Creek Contents 12 (Un)settled Histories Bojana Videkanic 36 Nourishment as Resistance Elwood Jimmy 40 Sub/urban/altern Cosmopolitanism: Unsettling Scarborough’s Cartographic Imaginary Ranu Basu 54 Scarborough Cannot Be Boxed In Shawn Micallef 88 List of Works 92 Bios 98 Acknowledgements 10 11 Gatineau Hydro Corridor 13 I am moved by my love for human life; (Un)settled Histories by the firm conviction that all the world Bojana Videkanic must stop the butchery, stop the slaughter. I am moved by my scars, by my own filth to re-write history with my body to shed the blood of those who betray themselves To life, world humanity I ascribe To my people . my history . I address my vision. —Lee Maracle, “War,” Bent Box To unsettle means to disturb, unnerve, and upset, but could also mean to offer pause for thinking otherwise about an issue or an idea. From May to October 2017, (Un)settled, a six-month-long curatorial project, took place at Guild Park and Gardens in south Scarborough, and at the Doris McCarthy Gallery at the University of Toronto Scarborough (where the exhibition was titled Unsettling), showcasing the work of Lori Blondeau, Lisa Myers, Duorama, Basil AlZeri, and Terrance Houle. The project was a multi-pronged collaboration between myself, the Department of Fine Arts at the University of Waterloo, the Doris McCarthy Gallery, Friends of the Guild, the Waterloo Archives, the 7a*11d International Performance Art Festival’s special project 7a*md8, curated by Golboo Amani and Francisco-Fernando Granados, and the Landmarks Project. -
Tree Canopy Study 201
IE11.1 - Attachment 2 Tree Canopy Study 201 Prepared by: KBM Resources Group Lallemand Inc./BioForest Dillon Consulting Limited 8 With Special Advisors Peter Duinker and James Steenberg, Dalhousie University 2018 Tree Canopy Study Consulting Team Lallemand Inc./BioForest Allison Craig, MFC John Barker, MFC KBM Resources Group Rike Burkhardt, MFC, RPF Ben Kuttner, PhD, RPF Arnold Rudy, MScF Dillon Consulting Limited David Restivo, HBSc, EP John Fairs, HBA Sarah Galloway, HBES Merrilees Willemse, HBA, MCIP, RPP Dalhousie University (Special Advisors) Peter Duinker, PhD James Steenberg, PhD Acknowledgements We gratefully acknowledge the contributions of the field crews, who recorded the i-Tree data used to generate many of the findings in this report: Lallemand Inc./BioForest: Ahmad Alamad, Laura Brodey, George Chen, Jessica Corrigan, Aurora Lavender, Julia Reale Dillon Consulting Ltd: Trevor Goulet Our thanks go to the City of Toronto Steering Committee members who provided valuable insight and expertise. Daniel Boven, Acting Manager Beth McEwen, Manager Forestry Policy and Planning Forest & Natural Area Management Connie Pinto, Program Standards & Carol Walker, Manager Development Officer Urban Forestry – EWMS Project Forestry Policy and Planning Raymond Vendrig, Manager Ryan Garnett, Manager Urban Forestry Renewal Geospatial Data Integration & Access Page i of 270 2018 Tree Canopy Study Our thanks go also to the key experts who provided input on the draft key findings. Amory Ngan, Project Manager, Tree Planting Strategy, Urban Forestry Andrew Pickett, Urban Forestry Coordinator (A), Urban Forestry Christine Speelman, Sr. Project Coordinator (A), Urban Forestry David Kellershohn, Manager, Stormwater Manager, Toronto Water Jane Welsh, Project Manager, Zoning Bylaw & Environmental Planning, City Planning Jane Weninger, Sr. -
Digital Communications at the City of Toronto
STAFF REPORT ACTION REQUIRED Digital Communications at the City of Toronto Date: June 11, 2012 To: Government Management Committee From: City Manager Wards: All Reference Number: SUMMARY At its meeting on May 24, 2012, the Government Management Committee requested the City Manager to report to the June 27, 2012 meeting: 1. With the proposed role and responsibilities of the digital communications position; and 2. That the report also include an itemized listing and account names of the following: - 53 e-update lists - 23 RSS (Really Simple Syndication) feeds - 31 Twitter accounts - 26 Facebook pages - 2 Flickr photo streams - 3 City blogs - 1 official YouTube channel This report provides additional information about the role and responsibilities associated with the digital communications position Strategic Communications is creating. It also provides an itemized listing of the City’s various digital communications channels and social media platforms (Appendix A), which are available at www.toronto.ca/e-updates. As outlined in the May 9, 2012 report, Supporting Digital Communications at the City of Toronto, it is important that the City leverage the opportunities that digital, mobile and social media platforms provide to communicate and engage with residents, businesses and visitors about City programs, services, events and initiatives. Staff report on Digital Communications at the City of Toronto 1 The digital communications position within Strategic Communications will be responsible for providing leadership and direction related to the development of the City’s corporate-wide digital communications strategy, ensuring the City’s digital activities are coordinated and aligned with other communications planning initiatives, and for supporting the appropriate and effective use of social media. -
Renaming to the Toronto Zoo Road
Councillor Paul Ainslie Constituency Office, Toronto City Hall Toronto City Council Scarborough Civic Centre 100 Queen Street West Scarborough East - Ward 43 150 Borough Drive Suite C52 Scarborough, Ontario M1P 4N7 Toronto, Ontario M5H 2N2 Chair, Government Management Committee Tel: 416-396-7222 Tel: 416-392-4008 Fax: 416-392-4006 Website: www.paulainslie.com Email: [email protected] Date: October 27, 2016 To: Chair, Councillor Chin Lee and Scarborough Community Council Members Re: Meadowvale Road Renaming between Highway 401 and Old Finch Road Avenue Recommendation: 1. Scarborough Community Council request the Director, Engineering Support Services & Construction Services and the Technical Services Division begin the process to review options for the renaming of Meadowvale Road between Highway 401 and Old Finch Avenue including those of a "honourary" nature. 2. Staff to report back to the February 2017 meeting The Toronto Zoo is the largest zoo in Canada attracting thousands of visitors annually becoming a landmark location in our City. Home to over 5,000 animals it is situated in a beautiful natural habitat in one of Canada's largest urban parks. Opening its doors on August 15, 1974 the Toronto Zoo has been able to adapt throughout the years developing a vision to "educate visitors on current conservation issues and help preserve the incredible biodiversity on the planet", through their work with endangered species, plans for a wildlife health centre and through their Research & Veterinary Programs. I believe it would be appropriate to introduce a honourary street name for the section of Meadowvale Road between Highway 401 and Old Finch Avenue to recognize the only public entrance to the Toronto Zoo. -
Update on Metrolinx Transit Expansion Projects –
June 8th, 2021 Sent via E-mail Derrick Toigo Executive Director, Transit Expansion Division Toronto City Hall 24th fl. E., 100 Queen St. W. Toronto, ON M5H 2N2 Dear Derrick, Thank you for your ongoing support and close collaboration in advancing Metrolinx transit expansion projects across the City of Toronto. The purpose of this letter is to respond to your letter dated May 13, 2021 which transmitted City Council’s decisions of April 7th and 8th, 2021, where Toronto City Council adopted the recommendations in agenda item MM31.12: Ontario Line - Getting Transit Right: Federal Environmental Assessment and Hybrid Option Review – moved by Councillor Paula Fletcher, seconded by Councilor Joe Cressy with amendments, we provide the following information. Request for Federal Environmental Assessment In response to the request made by Save Jimmie Simpson! and the Lakeshore East Community Advisory Committee in March 2021 to conduct an environmental assessment of the above- ground section of Ontario Line (the “Project”) through Riverside and Leslieville, on April 16, 2021, the Honourable Jonathan Wilkinson, Federal Minister of Environment and Climate Change (the “Minister”), announced the Project does not warrant designation under the Impact Assessment Act. The Minister’s response is available at the Impact Assessment Agency of Canada website, Reference Number 81350. In making his decision, the Minister considered the potential for the Project to cause adverse effects within federal jurisdiction, adverse direct or incidental effects, public concern related to these effects, as well as adverse impacts on the Aboriginal and Treaty rights of the Indigenous peoples of Canada. The Minister also considered the analysis of the Impact Assessment Agency of Canada. -
The Hidden Epidemic a Report on Child and Family Poverty in Toronto
THE HIDDEN EPIDEMIC A Report on Child and Family Poverty in Toronto The hidden epidemic A Report on Child and Family Poverty in Toronto November 2014 1 Acknowledgements This report was researched and written by a working group consisting of: Michael Polanyi Children’s Aid Society of Toronto and Alliance for a Poverty-Free Toronto Lesley Johnston Social Planning Toronto Anita Khanna Family Service Toronto/Ontario Campaign 2000 Said Dirie Children’s Aid Society of Toronto and Alliance for a Poverty-Free Toronto michael kerr Colour of Poverty – Colour of Change and Alliance for a Poverty-Free Toronto Research and data analysis support provided by the City of Toronto is gratefully acknowledged. Financial support was provided by the Children’s Aid Society of Toronto and the Children’s Aid Foundation’s Community Initiatives Program. Editing and design support was provided by Tilman Lewis and Peter Grecco. We thank Ann Fitzpatrick, Christa Freiler, Skylar Maharaj, Laurel Rothman and Alex Tranmer for their review of and assistance with the paper. THE HIDDEN EPIDEMIC A Report on Child and Family Poverty in Toronto Contents Executive Summary 1 1. Introduction 3 2. Current Levels of Child and Family Poverty in Toronto and Beyond 6 3. Which Toronto Children Are Affected by Poverty? 9 Geography 9 Ethno-racial Background 12 Indigenous Communities 13 Immigration or Citizenship Status 13 Disability 13 Family Structure 13 4. Growing Up in poverty – Reality and impacts on children in Toronto 14 Access to Nutrition 14 Access to Housing 16 Access to Education 17 Access to Recreation 19 5. Underlying Causes of Family Poverty 20 Inadequate Employment Income 20 Inadequate Income Supports and Community Services 22 Lack of Access to Affordable Public Services 24 6.