DOCSLIB.ORG

APPENDIX L9 Public Comments

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
APPENDIX L9 Public Comments ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT APPENDIX L9 Public Comments Table of Contents Public Comments Table .................................................................................... L9-1 SCARBOROUGH WATERFRONT PROJECT Toronto and Region Conservation ID # Date Source Comments Theme(s) 1 September 12, 2015 Shoreline Tour I guess this is a positive comment but could have listened to more more tours throughout the year Access Comment Form Public Access – how to manage an increase in the # of people accessing the Bluffs. Consultation + Parking – better bike access Parking Traffic 2 September 12, 2015 Shoreline Tour Access by car Access Comment Form 3 September 12, 2015 Shoreline Tour I like the emphasis on finding solutions to erosion that are more “natural” or less invasive, and that accommodate Access Comment Form human AND animal / plant / insect life Ecology Making the trail safe for hiking, but still educating people about how not to disturb the natural / wildlife in the area. Erosion 4 September 12, 2015 Shoreline Tour A lot of work to put on. need to promote widely so public awareness is present for full consultation Access Comment Form Promoting widely to obtain maximum exposure + awareness Accessibility Biking trails + accessibility (AODA) Consultation 5 September 12, 2015 Shoreline Tour Hiking Trail Access Comment Form 6 September 12, 2015 Shoreline Tour Connect it with Bluffers Comment on Comment Form Alternative 7 September 12, 2015 Shoreline Tour Better access to the waterfront would be great Access Comment Form 8 September 12, 2015 Shoreline Tour One of the existing accesses to the waterfront be made available in Guildwood, but not Greyabbey Trail Comment on Comment Form Alternative 9 September 12, 2015 Shoreline Tour Waterfront Trail West to Connect Comment on Comment Form Alternative 10 September 12, 2015 Shoreline Tour Continuous Walking / Cycling Trail to Boardwalk At Woodbine Comment on Comment Form Alternative 11 September 12, 2015 Shoreline Tour Connect to Bluffers Park for Public Access Comment Form 12 September 12, 2015 Shoreline Tour I hope Bluffers will join the present trail in some capacity. Comment on Comment Form Alternative 13 September 12, 2015 Shoreline Tour Better access to the Waterfront → So we could walk the tour rather than needing vans. Access Comment Form Better connections to the parks East & West of the site Comment on Alternative 14 September 12, 2015 Shoreline Tour Make this a part of the Waterfront Trail Comment on Comment Form Alternative L9-1 ID # Date Source Comments Theme(s) 15 September 12, 2015 Shoreline Tour As a walker using the road along the waterfront, I would enjoy less vegetation along the water side of path. With all Ecology Comment Form the trees & bushes on both sides it gets very hot, as well as not having good views of the lake. Existing Conditions 16 September 12, 2015 Shoreline Tour Look Forward to Ongoing Communication On the Progress Signage Comment Form Information Signs So People Can Learn 17 September 12, 2015 Shoreline Tour Post a sign / picture board of the fish that are ‘catchable’ near the places where people are currently fishing with Existing Comment Form instructions of what they should do with their catch. currently people who catch carp throw them in the bushes. Conditions Signage 18 September 12, 2015 Shoreline Tour Instructional Signs e.g. layers of the bluff Signage Comment Form 19 September 12, 2015 Shoreline Tour It is good option to preserve the environment and engage community to actively part of it. Consultation Comment Form Ecology 20 September 12, 2015 Shoreline Tour Shoreline protection is very important, but in the process, we lose the “bluff” or cliff. I’d like to see that preserved Ecology Comment Form somewhere – and Bluffer’s Park may do. It’s a shame should we lose all of it. 21 September 12, 2015 Shoreline Tour Better explanation of who has jurisdiction over what would be good e.g. wind turbines vs bird habitat. Accessibility Comment Form We prefer to keep the area more on the wild side even at the expense of accessibility. (AODA) Ecology Miscellaneous 22 September 12, 2015 Shoreline Tour Swimming beaches Beach Comment Form Diving park for shipwrecks Boat dock / launch Washrooms / marina Trail must be made safe for women & kids Comment on Emergency phones Alternative Lighting Park Amenities Connect trail to beach (bluffers park) Safety Connect trail to P.U. trail Build marina at East Point Build sports facilities at East Point 23 September 12, 2015 Shoreline Tour Maintaining natural beauty Ecology Comment Form Make the road smoother Materials Create look out points with maps and info about the area Signage 24 September 12, 2015 Shoreline Tour Love to see clearer public access pts and connections to bluffers. Appreciate we may need to use trail design to Access Comment Form provide access and protect natural feel. Comment on Alternative L9-2 ID # Date Source Comments Theme(s) 25 September 12, 2015 Shoreline Tour Include sign posts with descriptions along trail long-term-commission various art works between fool’s paradise & Park Amenities Comment Form guild park. Create an art & nature walk. Signage 26 September 12, 2015 Shoreline Tour Focus on preservation as opposed to making it more recreational. Ecology Comment Form 27 September 12, 2015 Shoreline Tour As neighbours we hope to see the nature preserved as well as a place our family can explore Access Comment Form Protected and preserved areas without human access as well as controlled spaces for walking + bicycles, water Ecology access 28 September 12, 2015 Shoreline Tour Footpath along shore, informal, no lighting Beach Comment Form No swimming beach Boat dock / launch No marina / marina Comment on Alternative 29 September 12, 2015 Shoreline Tour It would be nice to see the trees & shrubs cut down from road/path to water - be removed/cut down Access Comment Form More items like ‘the Passage’ on the shoreline Ecology 30 September 12, 2015 Shoreline Tour Education to public on danger of Bluffs eroding i.e. see too many people climbing down Erosion Comment Form Existing Conditions 31 September 12, 2015 Shoreline Tour More info on how this study connects with neighbouring areas. Development Comment Form Only recreational, non-commercial opportunities Other Initiatives 32 September 12, 2015 Shoreline Tour Water park on waterfront! Park Amenities Comment Form 33 September 12, 2015 Shoreline Tour Picnic areas along the various spots in the project area. Park Amenities Comment Form Any activities that will draw in visitors to enjoy the shoreline. 34 September 12, 2015 Shoreline Tour Not sure. I like all the ideas and think they are sufficient. Maybe install some tall posts for bat boxes? And see if Comment on Comment Form the water would be safe to swim? Alternative Ecology Water quality 35 September 12, 2015 Shoreline Tour Improved trail (waterfront trail) Comment on Comment Form I like focus on wildlife habitat, fish spawning areas Alternative Ecology 36 September 12, 2015 Shoreline Tour Consider a site/post where people with smart technology can interact. Post and get info about the area and Consultation Comment Form project. Park Amenities Please encourage the younger generation to participate in the project. 37 September 12, 2015 Shoreline Tour Erosion # 1 of course Erosion Comment Form Swimming – Interesting to note that beaches are a great form of prevention Park Amenities L9-3 ID # Date Source Comments Theme(s) 38 September 12, 2015 Shoreline Tour Wish money was available to let more people enjoy & appreciate this area Funding / cost Comment Form 39 September 12, 2015 Shoreline Tour Social media, especially instagram has popularized the bluffs to a huge degree in the past 4 months. Many visitors Existing Comment Form every weekend result in huge traffic jams every weekend and crazy unsafe behavior at the top of the bluffs at Conditions scarb. bluffs park. No understanding of the dangers of undercut. people will be killed. Fire dept now out too Safety regularly plucking folks off the bluffs. Traffic 40 September 12, 2015 Shoreline Tour Leave it alone Comment on Comment Form Alternative 41 September 12, 2015 Shoreline Tour Could add more wetlands to improve diversity Ecology Comment Form 42 September 12, 2015 Shoreline Tour Improve road Materials Comment Form 43 September 12, 2015 Shoreline Tour Doing a fantastic job Comment on Comment Form Alternative 44 September 12, 2015 Shoreline Tour Public Access Access Comment Form Bluff Remediation Management 45 September 12, 2015 Shoreline Tour Site is wonderful. Keep it as natural as possible. Access for older folks would be great – perhaps not the whole Access Comment Form length but some of it. Maybe a boardwalk connecting to Bluffers rather than change the shoreline? Accessibility There was concern about bringing more people into this sensitive area. Need to protect the slopes as well as the (AODA) wildlife from the people. The Bluffs are unique and need to be preserved. Ecology 46 September 12, 2015 Shoreline Tour Link up to bluffers park from the east. Comment on Comment Form Alternative 47 September 12, 2015 Shoreline Tour Would like to know more about future plans to preserve the Bluffs. Bluff Geology Comment Form 48 August 24, 2015 Email This letter is in response to the “shoreline concern” that was published in the summer edition of News and Views. Access There are several alternative perspectives to those expressed by and , and this letter presents Comment on one of those alternative perspectives. Alternative The first concern that the list is that a sandy beach at the base of the bluffs will be eliminated by the Miscellaneous construction of “an unnecessary bikeway”. Private Other developments that TRCA has along the shoreline have demonstrated that sandy beaches can be a part of any Landowners change that would make the beautiful shoreline at the base of the bluffs accessible to more people.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 3. Description of the Potentially Affected Environment
    ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT 3. Description of the Potentially Affected Environment The purpose of Chapter 3 is to present an overview of the environment potentially affected by the SWP to create familiarity with issues to be addressed and the complexity of the environment likely to be affected by the Project. All aspects of the environment within the Project Study Area (see Figure 2- 1 in Chapter 2) relevant to the Project and its potential effects have been described in this chapter. The chapter is divided into three sections which capture different components of the environment: 1. Physical environment: describes the coastal and geotechnical processes acting on the Project Study Area; 2. Natural environment: describes terrestrial and aquatic habitat and species; and, 3. Socio-economic environment: describes existing and planned land use, land ownership, recreation, archaeology, cultural heritage, and Aboriginal interests. The description of the existing environment is based on the information from a number of studies, which have been referenced in the relevant sections. Additional field surveys were undertaken where appropriate. Where applicable, future environmental conditions are also discussed. For most components of the environment, existing conditions within the Project Area or Project Study Area are described. Where appropriate, conditions within the broader Regional Study Area are also described. 3.1 Physical Environment Structures and property within slopes, valleys and shorelines may be susceptible to damage from natural processes such as erosion, slope failures and dynamic beaches. These processes become natural hazards when people and property locate in areas where they normally occur (MNR, 2001). Therefore, understanding physical natural processes is vital to developing locally-appropriate Alternatives in order to meet Project Objectives.
    [Show full text]
  • Rail Deck Park Executive Summary
    EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Background The proposal for Rail Deck Park (RDP) comprises the construction of a decking structure over the rail corridor in downtown Toronto between Blue Jays Way and Bathurst Street to facilitate the development of approximately 20 acres of new parkland with associated pedestrian / cycle connections as shown in Figure 1. (Potential inclusion of the Metrolinx- owned property at the southwest corner of Spadina Avenue and Front Street increases the size to 21 acres.) In 2017, an Engineering and Costing Study for Rail Deck Park was undertaken by Build Toronto and consultants WSP and McMillan Associates Architects, in consultation with the City of Toronto. This document provides a high-level summary of the findings from that study. Figure 1 - Rail Deck Park Study Area The purpose of the study was to produce a comprehensive reference design concept for RDP with a specific focus on the technical aspects of the site and surrounding areas including: • Topography, landforms and physical features; • Rail corridor and yard operations, initiatives and constraints; • Geotechnical and hydrogeological conditions; • Structural solutions; • Archaeological considerations; • Construction methodologies; Executive Summary – Rail Deck Park Engineering & Costing Study Report Page 1 of 10 • Vibration and sound attenuation; • Utilities; • Traffic and transportation; and • Permits and approvals. The study did not involve specific design or programming for the park itself. Instead it incorporated assumptions concerning potential future park design elements to inform the requirements for the decking structure. Reference Design Concept The reference design concept for RDP was developed from the “bottom up” utilizing data that was collected from various sources. The design concept was informed by a tabletop review of existing conditions that was undertaken at the onset of the study.
    [Show full text]
  • What Spot Off the Beaten Path Would You Show a Tourist? Recommendations from @Metromorning Followers on Twitter
    Toronto What spot off the beaten path would you show a tourist? Recommendations from @metromorning followers on Twitter. Feb 2017 9 Metro Morning 10 jauntful.com/metromorning 2 1 3 6 4 8 7 ©OpenStreetMap contributors, ©Mapbox, ©Foursquare Étienne Brulé Park 1 Toronto Hunt Club 2 Kensington Market 3 Grenadier Pond 4 Park Golf Course Neighborhood Lake Depends on the season! Fall: Etienne The Toronto Hunt Club and its view of Off-the-beaten-path #toronto: You just don't expect to see that kind of Brûlé Park (colour, salmon jumping). the lake at sunset when there is a sailing Kensington Market, Sunnybrook beauty off a major street in T.O. @tvgurl @KinderFynes regatta going on! @Think_teach Park/Don River bike trail, Ashbridges Bay/Beaches. @MartiniBlake 13 Crosby Ave, Toronto 1355 Kingston Rd., Toronto Note Against the Grain Urban Tavern... 6 Cherry Beach 7 Ward's Island 8 Bar Beach Neighborhood One of the best kept secrets in the City Sugar Beach! Against the Grain for lunch Cherry beach, Leslie street spit! The islands are a popular recreational are the parks, vistas and views all along on patio, stroll along lake, relax on @jengonzales8 destination, and are home to a small the Scarborough Bluffs, top and bottom. "beach", share Redpath history. residential community and to the Billy @CllrCrawford @jsquaredink Bishop Toronto City Airport. @nogahK 25 Dockside Dr, Toronto (647) 344-1562 corusquay.atgurbantavern.ca Cherry Beach, Toronto Brickworks Park 9 Humber Arboretum 10 Other Garden A community environmental centre that Located behind Humber College's North inspires and equips visitors to live, work campus, the Humber Arboretum consists and play more sustainably.
    [Show full text]
  • City of Toronto — Detached Homes Average Price by Percentage Increase: January to June 2016
    City of Toronto — Detached Homes Average price by percentage increase: January to June 2016 C06 – $1,282,135 C14 – $2,018,060 1,624,017 C15 698,807 $1,649,510 972,204 869,656 754,043 630,542 672,659 1,968,769 1,821,777 781,811 816,344 3,412,579 763,874 $691,205 668,229 1,758,205 $1,698,897 812,608 *C02 $2,122,558 1,229,047 $890,879 1,149,451 1,408,198 *C01 1,085,243 1,262,133 1,116,339 $1,423,843 E06 788,941 803,251 Less than 10% 10% - 19.9% 20% & Above * 1,716,792 * 2,869,584 * 1,775,091 *W01 13.0% *C01 17.9% E01 12.9% W02 13.1% *C02 15.2% E02 20.0% W03 18.7% C03 13.6% E03 15.2% W04 19.9% C04 13.8% E04 13.5% W05 18.3% C06 26.9% E05 18.7% W06 11.1% C07 29.2% E06 8.9% W07 18.0% *C08 29.2% E07 10.4% W08 10.9% *C09 11.4% E08 7.7% W09 6.1% *C10 25.9% E09 16.2% W10 18.2% *C11 7.9% E10 20.1% C12 18.2% E11 12.4% C13 36.4% C14 26.4% C15 31.8% Compared to January to June 2015 Source: RE/MAX Hallmark, Toronto Real Estate Board Market Watch *Districts that recorded less than 100 sales were discounted to prevent the reporting of statistical anomalies R City of Toronto — Neighbourhoods by TREB District WEST W01 High Park, South Parkdale, Swansea, Roncesvalles Village W02 Bloor West Village, Baby Point, The Junction, High Park North W05 W03 Keelesdale, Eglinton West, Rockcliffe-Smythe, Weston-Pellam Park, Corso Italia W10 W04 York, Glen Park, Amesbury (Brookhaven), Pelmo Park – Humberlea, Weston, Fairbank (Briar Hill-Belgravia), Maple Leaf, Mount Dennis W05 Downsview, Humber Summit, Humbermede (Emery), Jane and Finch W09 W04 (Black Creek/Glenfield-Jane
    [Show full text]
  • 3131 Lower Don River West Lower Don River West 4.0 DESCRIPTION
    Lower Don River West Environmental Study Report Remedial Flood Protection Project 4.0 DESCRIPTION OF LOWER DON 4.1 The Don River Watershed The Don River is one of more than sixty rivers and streams flowing south from the Oak Ridges Moraine. The River is approximately 38 km long and outlets into the Keating Channel, which then conveys the flows into Toronto Harbour and Lake Historic Watershed Ontario. The entire drainage basin of the Don urbanization of the river's headwaters in York River is 360 km2. Figure 4.1 and Figure 4.2, on the Region began in the early 1980s and continues following pages, describe the existing and future today. land use conditions within the Don River Watershed. Hydrologic changes in the watershed began when settlers converted the forests to agricultural fields; For 200 years, the Don Watershed has been many streams were denuded even of bank side subject to intense pressures from human vegetation. Urban development then intensified settlement. These have fragmented the river the problems of warmer water temperatures, valley's natural branching pattern; degraded and erosion, and water pollution. Over the years often destroyed its once rich aquatic and during the three waves of urban expansion, the terrestrial wildlife habitat; and polluted its waters Don River mouth, originally an extensive delta with raw sewage, industrial/agricultural marsh, was filled in and the lower portion of the chemicals, metals and other assorted river was straightened. contaminants. Small Don River tributaries were piped and Land clearing, settlement, and urbanization have buried, wetlands were "reclaimed," and springs proceeded in three waves in the Don River were lost.
    [Show full text]
  • Meadowcliffe Drive Erosion Control Project
    Meadowcliffe Drive Erosion Control Project Toronto and Region Conservation Authority Environmental Study Report March 1, 2010 5 Shoreham Drive, Downsview, Ontario M3N 1S4 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The Toronto and Region Conservation Authority gratefully acknowledges the efforts and contributions of the following people participating in the planning and design phases of the Meadowcliffe Drive Erosion Control Project: Al Sinclair Meadowcliffe Drive Resident Barbara Heidenreich Ontario Heritage Trust Beth McEwen City of Toronto Bruce Pinchin Shoreplan Engineering Limited Councilor Brian Ashton City of Toronto Councillor Paul Ainslie City of Toronto Daphne Webster Meadowcliffe Drive Resident David Argue iTransConsulting Limited Don Snider Meadowcliffe Drive resident Janet Sinclair Meadowcliffe Drive Resident Jason Crowder Terraprobe Limited Jim Berry Toronto and Region Conservation Authority Joe Delle Fave Toronto and Region Conservation Authority Joseph Palmissano iTransConsulting Limited Larry Field Toronto and Region Conservation Authority Laura Stephenson Toronto and Region Conservation Authority Lindsay Prihoda Toronto and Region Conservation Authority Lori Metcalfe Guildwood Village Community Association Mark Preston Toronto and Region Conservation Authority Mike Tanos Terraprobe Limited Moranne McDonnell Toronto and Region Conservation Authority Nancy Lowes City of Toronto Nick Saccone Toronto and Region Conservation Authority Patricia Newland Toronto and Region Conservation Authority Paul Albanese City of Toronto Peter Xiarchos M.P.P Lorenzo Berardinetti’s Office Susan Scinocca Meadowcliffe Drive Resident Sushaliya Ragunathan M.P.P Lorenzo Berardinetti’s Office Timo Puhakka Guildwood Village Community Association Trevor Harris Meadowcliffe Drive Resident Tudor Botzan Toronto and Region Conservation Authority II EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) continues to work towards ensuring healthy rivers and shorelines, greenspace and biodiversity, and sustainable communities.
    [Show full text]
  • Unsettling 2 3
    Unsettling 2 3 Bendale neighbourhood Unsettling Basil AlZeri Lori Blondeau Duorama Terrance Houle Lisa Myers Curated by Bojana Videkanic Cover: Scarborough Bluffs 6 7 Highland Creek Contents 12 (Un)settled Histories Bojana Videkanic 36 Nourishment as Resistance Elwood Jimmy 40 Sub/urban/altern Cosmopolitanism: Unsettling Scarborough’s Cartographic Imaginary Ranu Basu 54 Scarborough Cannot Be Boxed In Shawn Micallef 88 List of Works 92 Bios 98 Acknowledgements 10 11 Gatineau Hydro Corridor 13 I am moved by my love for human life; (Un)settled Histories by the firm conviction that all the world Bojana Videkanic must stop the butchery, stop the slaughter. I am moved by my scars, by my own filth to re-write history with my body to shed the blood of those who betray themselves To life, world humanity I ascribe To my people . my history . I address my vision. —Lee Maracle, “War,” Bent Box To unsettle means to disturb, unnerve, and upset, but could also mean to offer pause for thinking otherwise about an issue or an idea. From May to October 2017, (Un)settled, a six-month-long curatorial project, took place at Guild Park and Gardens in south Scarborough, and at the Doris McCarthy Gallery at the University of Toronto Scarborough (where the exhibition was titled Unsettling), showcasing the work of Lori Blondeau, Lisa Myers, Duorama, Basil AlZeri, and Terrance Houle. The project was a multi-pronged collaboration between myself, the Department of Fine Arts at the University of Waterloo, the Doris McCarthy Gallery, Friends of the Guild, the Waterloo Archives, the 7a*11d International Performance Art Festival’s special project 7a*md8, curated by Golboo Amani and Francisco-Fernando Granados, and the Landmarks Project.
    [Show full text]
  • Tommy Thompson Park Update
    Attachment 3: City of Toronto Report for Action REPORT FOR ACTION Tommy Thompson Park Update Date: May 10, 2021 To: Infrastructure and Environment Committee From: Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation Wards: Ward 14 - Toronto-Danforth SUMMARY Tommy Thompson Park (the Park) is the largest component of the broader Leslie Street Spit (the Spit), located at the base of Leslie Street where it meets the shore of Lake Ontario; all components of the Spit will ultimately be consolidated as Tommy Thompson Park (see Attachment 1). The Park is designated in the Official Plan as an Environmentally Significant Area and is recognized internationally as a Canadian Important Bird Area for supporting the conservation of birds and their habitat. The Park is owned by Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) and managed in partnership between TRCA and the City of Toronto. The Park demonstrates that nature can flourish in cities and contribute to the well-being of city residents; only minutes from downtown, the Park is an escape from the city, and a place to marvel at the force of nature. It is a pet-free urban wilderness that exists as the result of decades of careful management and stewardship of natural succession and habitat restoration processes by TRCA with the support of the City, community groups, and other partners. Its significant and diverse aquatic and terrestrial environments provide habitat for at-risk species who are otherwise challenged by the interrelated impacts of habitat loss, habitat fragmentation, urbanization and climate change. The Park's evolution into an urban wilderness can also be attributed to the work of advocacy groups like the Friends of the Spit, founded in 1977 by naturalists advocating for the Spit to grow naturally, without development and the privatization of uses.
    [Show full text]
  • AECOM Report 1.Dot
    Environmental Assessment chapter 3. description of the potentially affected environment 3. Description of the Potentially Affected Environment This chapter is divided into four different sections which describe different components of the baseline or existing environmental conditions. The first section describes the river characteristics which will influence the development of alternatives. This information has been separated from the remaining description of the natural environment such that some emphasis can be given to those aspects of the existing environment that are driving the development of alternatives for the DMNP. The second section describes the remaining components of the natural environment: fish and fish habitat, terrestrial vegetation, and wildlife. The third section addresses components related to soils and groundwater contamination. The final section describes socio-economic components: land use, air quality and noise, archaeology, aboriginal interests, and built heritage. 3.1 River Characteristics in the Project and Impact Assessment Study Areas The Don Watershed possesses a dendretic drainage pattern that flows southward for 38 kilometres (as the crow flies) from the Oak Ridges Moraine (ORM) to the Inner Harbour of Toronto. The Don possesses two major branches (the East and West Don), each consisting of many smaller sub-watershed systems, such as but not limited to Taylor Massey Creek, Wilket Creek, Patterson Creek and Pomona Creek. The confluence of the East and West Branches occurs approximately 6 kilometres upstream of the Impact Assessment Study Area. Downstream from the confluence, the sub-watershed is known as the Lower Don and includes all of the Don Narrows until reaching the Keating Channel. The entire watershed area or drainage basin of the Don River is approximately 360 square kilometres (Figure 3−1).
    [Show full text]
  • Rail Deck Park Engineering and Costing Study
    Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................................. 1 1.0 BACKGROUND ............................................................................................................... 8 1.1 Purpose ..................................................................................................................... 8 1.2 Alignment with Other Initiatives ................................................................................. 8 1.3 Project Team ............................................................................................................. 9 City of Toronto.................................................................................................. 9 Build Toronto.................................................................................................... 9 WSP Canada Group Limited............................................................................ 9 2.0 STUDY METHODOLOGY.............................................................................................. 10 2.1 Study Area............................................................................................................... 10 2.2 Data Gathering ........................................................................................................ 10 3.0 EXISTING CONDITIONS............................................................................................... 12 3.1 Topography & Landforms.......................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Framework Planning
    PORT LANDS PLANNING FRAMEWORK Purpose / Elements of the Planning Framework The Purpose of the Port Lands Planning Framework is to: Elements of the Planning Framework: • Integrate the other planning initiatives currently underway • An overall vision for the Port Lands and development objectives • A connections plan which will identify: • Update and refresh the vision for the Port Lands o Major and intermediate streets o Major pedestrian and cycling facilities • Provide a comprehensive picture of how the area should redevelop over the long-term and o A transit plan that also addresses City Council direction reconcile competing interests • Generalized land use direction • Provide a flexible/adaptable planning regime • Identification of character areas • A parks and open space plan which will define: • Ensure sustainable community building o Green corridors o District / Regional parks • Ensure that public and private investments contribute to the long-term vision and have o Water’s Edge Promenades lasting value • A heritage inventory and direction for listing/designating heritage resources • Provide the basis for Official Plan amendments • Urban design principles and structure plan: o Built form and building typologies • Resolve Ontario Municipal Board appeals of the Central Waterfront Secondary Plan o Special sites (catalyst uses) o Relationship of development to major public spaces o Urban design context for heritage features o Identification of major views • A high -level community services and facilities strategy • Implementation and phasing direction PROCESS WE ARE HERE PHASE 2: PHASE 1: PHASE 3: Vision / Background Recommendations Alternatives CONSULTATION Public Meeting | November 28, 2013 PORT LANDS PLANNING FRAMEWORK Port Lands Acceleration Initiative Plan (PLAI) EASTER N AV.E DON VALLEY PARKWAY EASTERN AVENUE Don River DON RIVER NOD RI REV STREET LESLIE KRAP LAKE SHORE BOULEVARD EAST Port Lands Acceleration Initiative (PLAI) TRLYA DRS The PLAI was initiated in October 2011 to: New River Crossing DON ROADWAY CARLAW AVE.
    [Show full text]
  • Midtown in Focus Parks and Public Realm Plan Part 3 of 3
    Attachment 2 - Part 3 of 3 CHAPTER 8 CITY OF TORONTO 2018 102 A CONNECTED AND VERSATILE NETWORK OF PUBLIC PARKS The parkland analysis and public feedback received have been synthesized with new park spaces previously identified as part of the 2014 Midtown in Focus: Parks, Open Space and Streetscape Master Plan to create a connected and versatile network of public parks for Midtown (Figure 11). The network capitalizes on the area’s existing park assets with an eye to expanding these parks and making better use of these spaces to support local needs. It also identifies a series of proposed public parks of all shapes and sizes throughout the area. In some instances, the identification of proposed parks is opportunistic to complement and further strengthen the Public Realm Moves or to recognize the transformative potential associated with the existing subway trench and Davisville Yard. In other instances, a practical approach has been taken to provide new park spaces capable of accommodating a range of locally-oriented passive and active activities throughout the area that will not only provide new park spaces, but also fill in missing gaps. Taken as a whole, the network of public parks that will be created responds to the challenges and opportunities facing Midtown both now and into the future. It has the potential to add at least 17 hectares of new parkland to Midtown’s existing 26.2 hectares of parkland. 103 Figure 11: Parks and Open Space Network Plan BLYTHWOOD ROAD Sherwood Park BRIAR HILL ROAD SHERWOOD AVE KEEWATIN AVE ROSELAWN AVE
    [Show full text]