Manual for Juding Oregon Soils

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Manual for Juding Oregon Soils Manual 6 • Reprinted September 2007 $12.50 MANUAL FOR JUDGING OREGON SOILS MANUAL FOR JUDGINJUDGINGG OREGON SOILS OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY EXTENSION SER OREGON STATE VICE Contents i Chapter l Why Study Soil? ............................................................................................... 1 Chapter 2 Factors of Soil Formation ................................................... 4 The Soil We Study Processes of Soil Formation............................................... 6 From Rock to Soil ................................................................ 7 Chapter 3 Master Horizons .................................................................. 9 Kinds of Soil Horizons Special Kinds of A, B, and C Horizons ............................ 10 Transition Horizons .......................................................... 12 Subdivisions of Thick Horizons ....................................... 13 More Than One Kind of Parent Material......................... 13 Typical Horizon Sequences .............................................. 14 Locating Boundaries Between Horizons ........................ 14 Chapter 4 Color of the Soil Matrix ..................................................... 15 Properties of Soil Horizons Mottling .............................................................................. 17 Texture ................................................................................ 18 Coarse Fragments .............................................................. 23 Soil Structure ..................................................................... 25 Soil Consistence ................................................................ 28 Horizon Boundaries .......................................................... 29 Special Features of Soil Horizons .................................... 30 Chapter 5 Effective Depth of Rooting ............................................... 33 Properties of the Whole Soil Available Water-Holding Capacity ................................... 34 Permeability ....................................................................... 36 Water Erosion Hazard ....................................................... 39 Wind Erosion Hazard ........................................................ 41 Internal Soil Drainage ........................................................ 42 Color Plates ........................................................................ 47 Chapter 6 Landform ............................................................................ 51 Site Characteristics Parent Materials ................................................................ 54 Stoniness and Rockiness .................................................. 57 Slope.................................................................................... 58 Aspect ................................................................................. 59 Chapter 7 Feasibility of Artificial Drainage ...................................... 61 Management Interpretations Suitability for Irrigation .................................................... 63 Most Intensive Crop .......................................................... 64 Erosion Control Practice .................................................. 70 Reaction Correction .......................................................... 73 Limitation for Septic Tank Drainfields ............................ 74 Appendixes A. How to Use Interpretation Guides .............................. 79 B. How to Set Up and Run a Soil Judging Contest ......... 81 C. Horizon Names Used Before 1983............................... 85 Glossary .............................................................................. 87 Scorecard............................................................................ 95 Interpretation Guide ......................................................... 97 ii Foreword oil judging has been part of the important aspects of soil behavior, vocational agriculture curriculum in such as effective depth, water-holding SOregon high schools for more than capacity, susceptibility to erosion, and 40 years. Since 1956, the OSU Extension internal drainage class. Service and the Oregon Association of 4. We explain why soil properties and soil Conservation Districts have worked behavior are important to soil manage- together to organize and operate the State ment. Soil Judging Contest. 5. We develop keys for students to use to The Extension Service also has pro- relate soil properties to important vided educational materials for the stu- decisions about irrigation suitability, dents and conducted training sessions for crop choices, erosion control, and the instructors. For many years, Exten- other questions. sion Bulletin 769, Soil Judging from the We don’t expect students to memorize Ground Up, was used as the primary text all the factors and interactions that enter for the program. into a management decision. We do hope, As we learned more about Oregon soils, however, that they will learn how to use however, and as soil management alterna- the keys to translate their evaluations of tives became more complicated, we profile data into solutions to real prob- realized that just revising EB 769 would lems facing modern agriculturalists and not do the job. Instead a completely new environmental scientists. manual was needed. Above all, we view soil judging prima- We began writing a new soil judging rily as an educational program. Contests manual, and developing a new format for certainly add a dimension of challenge judging soils, in 1978, when we introduced and fun, but they are not the primary several new ideas to a group of about 20 objective of the program. Instead, the Vo-Ag instructors. They liked the new main objective is to encourage students format, and their comments were very to investigate this fascinating resource we helpful as we wrote a draft of a new call soil, to discover how soils are orga- manual. We used this draft for 4 years while nized into horizons, to learn both how to we tested new ideas and revised the text. describe a few key properties of soil Publication of this manual would not horizons and to interpret them in terms of have been possible without numerous management practices—and to develop a suggestions from many soil scientists and sense of stewardship for the soils that Vo-Ag instructors who have been very support them. closely associated with the soil judging Nothing would make us happier than program for a number of years. To each of for a student to challenge some of the them, we express our sincere apprecia- generalized management interpretations tion. we describe in this manual in terms of There are several major changes in this their relevance to his or her own soil new Manual. conditions—and for the instructor to 1. We encourage students to study the seize that opportunity to do some real whole soil profile and evaluate each of teaching about the kinds of interactions the natural soil horizons present. one must consider when deciding how 2. We stress gathering primary data on best to use the soil resources available on just a few important properties that a given farm. When this happens, the students can determine in the field— Manual for Judging Oregon Soils will have color, texture, and structure. accomplished its real purpose. 3. We show students how to use these basic properties to discover some Chapter 1 1 Why Study Soil? oil is an essential natural resource. alfalfa hay and range grasses, we process Without a doubt, that is the most through livestock first. Even the fish we S important reason for studying the eat depend on plants that grow in the sea soil. Nathaniel Shaler put it this way: “Soil, using nutrients that have been washed out ever slipping away in streams to the sea, of the soil and carried to the sea in rivers is a kind of placenta that enables living and streams. things to feed upon the earth.” We study the soil, then, to increase our The sketch in Figure 1 illustrates our understanding of this resource that sup- dependence on the soil. Unlike plant life, ports us. we human beings can’t manufacture our Another important reason for studying own food from the four primary resources soil is that soils are different. Oregon alone of soil, air, water, and sunlight. Instead, we has nearly 2,000 different kinds of soils, depend completely on green plants, which ranging from deep to shallow, clayey to take nutrients and water from the soil and sandy, wet to dry, nearly level to steeply combine them with air and sunlight to sloping. These differences are important, provide our food supply. because different soils require different Some of those plants, such as wheat kinds of management practices. and corn, we eat directly. Others, such as Wet soils, for example, are essential components of wetland ecosystems. Proper management of wet soils depends 1Shaler, N.S., Man and the Earth (Chautauqua, on recognizing the imprint of saturated NY: The Chautauqua Press, 1915). Figure 1.—All of our food resources can be traced directly back to the soil. 2 Chapter 1 • Why Study Soil? conditions on soils and maintaining water morphology. Some properties, such as tables at desired levels. color and root abundance, can be deter- Many soils require irrigation for maxi- mined by eye. Others, such as texture and mum productivity. Both the amount of structure, require a keen sense of touch. irrigation water needed and the proper You, too, can learn how to determine method of applying it depend on a soil’s the important properties of soil
Recommended publications
  • Soils Section
    Soils Section 2003 Florida Envirothon Study Sections Soil Key Points SOIL KEY POINTS • Recognize soil as an important dynamic resource. • Describe basic soil properties and soil formation factors. • Understand soil drainage classes and know how wetlands are defined. • Determine basic soil properties and limitations, such as mottling and permeability by observing a soil pit or soil profile. • Identify types of soil erosion and discuss methods for reducing erosion. • Use soil information, including a soil survey, in land use planning discussions. • Discuss how soil is a factor in, or is impacted by, nonpoint and point source pollution. Florida’s State Soil Florida has the largest total acreage of sandy, siliceous, hyperthermic Aeric Haplaquods in the nation. This is commonly called Myakka fine sand. It does not occur anywhere else in the United States. There are more than 1.5 million acres of Myakka fine sand in Florida. On May 22, 1989, Governor Bob Martinez signed Senate Bill 525 into law making Myakka fine sand Florida’s official state soil. iii Florida Envirothon Study Packet — Soils Section iv Contents CONTENTS INTRODUCTION .........................................................................................................................1 WHAT IS SOIL AND HOW IS SOIL FORMED? .....................................................................3 SOIL CHARACTERISTICS..........................................................................................................7 Texture......................................................................................................................................7
    [Show full text]
  • World Reference Base for Soil Resources 2014 International Soil Classification System for Naming Soils and Creating Legends for Soil Maps
    ISSN 0532-0488 WORLD SOIL RESOURCES REPORTS 106 World reference base for soil resources 2014 International soil classification system for naming soils and creating legends for soil maps Update 2015 Cover photographs (left to right): Ekranic Technosol – Austria (©Erika Michéli) Reductaquic Cryosol – Russia (©Maria Gerasimova) Ferralic Nitisol – Australia (©Ben Harms) Pellic Vertisol – Bulgaria (©Erika Michéli) Albic Podzol – Czech Republic (©Erika Michéli) Hypercalcic Kastanozem – Mexico (©Carlos Cruz Gaistardo) Stagnic Luvisol – South Africa (©Márta Fuchs) Copies of FAO publications can be requested from: SALES AND MARKETING GROUP Information Division Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations Viale delle Terme di Caracalla 00100 Rome, Italy E-mail: [email protected] Fax: (+39) 06 57053360 Web site: http://www.fao.org WORLD SOIL World reference base RESOURCES REPORTS for soil resources 2014 106 International soil classification system for naming soils and creating legends for soil maps Update 2015 FOOD AND AGRICULTURE ORGANIZATION OF THE UNITED NATIONS Rome, 2015 The designations employed and the presentation of material in this information product do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) concerning the legal or development status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The mention of specific companies or products of manufacturers, whether or not these have been patented, does not imply that these have been endorsed or recommended by FAO in preference to others of a similar nature that are not mentioned. The views expressed in this information product are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of FAO.
    [Show full text]
  • Soils and Soil-Forming Material Technical Information Note 04 /2017 30Th November 2017
    Soils and Soil-forming Material Technical Information Note 04 /2017 30th November 2017 Contents 1. Introduction to Soils ........................................................................................................................ 2 2. Components and Properties of Soil ................................................................................................ 7 3. Describing and Categorising soils .................................................................................................. 29 4. Policy, Regulation and Roles ......................................................................................................... 34 5. Soil Surveys, Handling and Management ..................................................................................... 40 6. Recommended Soil Specifications ................................................................................................ 42 7. References .................................................................................................................................... 52 “Upon this handful of soil our survival depends. Husband it and it will grow our food, our fuel, and our shelter and surround us with beauty. Abuse it and the soil will collapse and die, taking humanity with it.” From Vedas Sanskrit Scripture – circa 1500 BC The aim of this Technical Information Note is to assist Landscape Professionals (primarily landscape architects) when considering matters in relation to soils and soil-forming material. Soil is an essential requirement for providing
    [Show full text]
  • Zinc Redistribution in a Soil Developed from Limestone During Pedogenesis C
    Zinc Redistribution in a Soil Developed from Limestone During Pedogenesis C. Laveuf, Sophie Cornu, Denis Baize, Michel Hardy, Olivier Josière, Sylvain Drouin, Ary Bruand, F. Juillot To cite this version: C. Laveuf, Sophie Cornu, Denis Baize, Michel Hardy, Olivier Josière, et al.. Zinc Redistribution in a Soil Developed from Limestone During Pedogenesis. Pedosphere, Elsevier, 2009, 19 (3), pp.292-304. 10.1016/S1002-0160(09)60120-X. insu-00403877 HAL Id: insu-00403877 https://hal-insu.archives-ouvertes.fr/insu-00403877 Submitted on 21 Nov 2016 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Zinc Redistribution in a Soil Developed from Limestone During Pedogenesis∗1 C. LAVEUF1,∗2,S.CORNU1, D. BAIZE1, M. HARDY1, O. JOSIERE1, S. DROUIN2, A. BRUAND2 and F. JUILLOT3 1INRA, UR0272 Science du Sol, Centre de recherche d’Orl´eans, 45075 Orl´eans cedex 2 (France) 2ISTO, UMR 6113, CNRS, Universit´ed’Orl´eans, 45071 Orl´eans cedex 2 (France) 3IMPMC, UMR CNRS 7590, Universit´e Paris 6 et 7, IPGC, 75252 Paris cedex 05 (France) (Received November 20, 2008; revised March 23, 2009) ABSTRACT The long-term redistribution of Zn in a naturally Zn-enriched soil during pedogenesis was quantified based on mass balance calculations.
    [Show full text]
  • Soil Life in Reconstructed Ecosystems: Initial Soil Food Web Responses After Rebuilding a Forest Soil Profile for a Climate Change Experiment
    Soil life in reconstructed ecosystems: Initial soil food web responses after rebuilding a forest soil profile for a climate change experiment Paul T. Rygiewicza,*, Vicente J. Monleonb, Elaine R. Inghamc, Kendall J. Martind, Mark G. Johnsona ABSTRACT Disrupting ecosystem components. while transferring and reconstructing them for experiments can produce myriad responses. Establishing the extent of these biological responses as the system approaches a new equilibrium allows us more reliably to emulate comparable native systems. That is, the sensitivity of analyzing ecosystem processes in a reconstructed system is improved by excluding the period when observed phenomena are primarily responses caused by establishing the experiment rather than effects of imposed treatments; achieved by determining the extent of any pulse of activity caused by preparatory procedures. A native forest soil was physically disrupted when it was collected. sieved. and then rebuilt in lysimeters in a controlled-environment study evaluating the influence of elevated atmospheric CO2 concentration and elevated atmospheric temperature on the reconstructed soil that was planted with Douglas-fir (Pseudotsugo menziesii Mirb. Franco) seedlings. Generally. soil food web populations responded in two phases during the exposure as indicated by preliminary evaluation of the 4.5-year dataset. Also. previous work indicated that relatively elevated soil CO2 effluxes occurred during the first phase. suggesting that food web populations may have responded to carbon sources made available when the soil was harvested and its profile reconstructed in the lysimeters, Results are presented for bacterial and fungal biomass. numbers of protozoa and nematodes to gain insight on whether the first phase responses are attributable to the acute stress of physically disrupting the soil.
    [Show full text]
  • Basic Soil Science: Soil Horizons Notes
    Basic Soil Science: Soil Horizons Notes Date _______________Topic___________________________________ -----------------------------------------Notes-------------------------------------- -- Soil Horizons: ---------------------------------------------- ------------ Formulas Points, Key Ideas, Main ------------------------------------------- Why advocate? ----------------------------------------------------Summary of Main Ideas------------------------------------------------------- ------- Basic Soil Science BSS4 Soil Horizons Basic Soil Science: Soil Horizons Notes -----------------------------------------Notes-------------------------------------- Subordinate Divisions: ---------- -------------------------------------- ------------ Horizon Boundary: Main Ideas, Key Points, Formulas Points, Key Ideas, Main ------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------------Summary of Main Ideas------------------------------------------------------- ------- Basic Soil Science BSS4 Soil Horizons Basic Soil Science: Soil Horizons BSS4.1 Horizon Matching Cards • “Organic” Horizon O • Does not have to be 100% organic matter material • thin O horizons • Do not occur in cultivated areas • Destroyed by plowing • Mineral soil • Dark color formed by Horizon A additional humus • Granular or fine blocky structure • Can be easily crushed • Thickness ranges from a few inches to more than 30 inches • Every cultivated agricultural soil has an A horizon • Important in maintaining soil fertility and favorable environment for
    [Show full text]
  • Paleopedological Evidences of Ancient Man-Induced Environmental Change
    233 Special Section Paleopedology and archaeology: Paleopedological evidences of ancient man-induced environmental change VI. International Symposium and Field Workshop on Paleopedology International Commission on Paleopedology, International Union of Quaternary Research (INQUA), International Union of Soil Sciences (IUSS) Colegio de Postgraduados, Montecillo, Mexico, October 2001 Preface Sergey Sedov and Peter M. Jacobs Guest editors Paleopedology is a rapidly developing branch of geoscience that investigates and inter- prets the carriers and elements of “soil memory” in surface and buried soils to decode the rich and variable paleopedological records of past environmental change. In this volume, Revista Mexicana de Ciencias Geológicas begins publishing papers presented at the VI International Symposium and Field Workshop on Paleopedology, held at the Colegio de Postgraduados, Montecillo, Mexico in October 2001 – an event of the International Commission on Paleo- pedology INQUA-IUSS, which for the first time took place in Latin America. This meeting investigated a wide variety of problems considered by paleopedologists, various case studies, and the methods used for their solution. A large part of paleosol research, whether buried or relict, is interdisciplinary in nature. Among the topics that attract major interest is the investigation of paleopedological indicators of ancient human-induced environmental change and the appli- cation of soil science methods in archaeological research. This issue contains the collection of papers presented during Session V of the Symposium: “Paleopedology and archaeology: Paleo- pedological evidences of ancient man-induced environmental change”, which covers various topics of soil archaeological studies. Heine summarizes decades of research on the record of human-induced soil degradation and erosion preserved in geoforms and soil sedimentary sequences in valleys, finding strong correlation with archaeological data on the settlement pattern and population density for prehispanic and colonial periods in Tlaxcala, Mexico.
    [Show full text]
  • Soil (Pedosphere) Soil Moisture Gravimetric Protocol Overview
    Soil (Pedosphere) Soil Moisture Gravimetric Protocol Overview This module provides step-by-step instructions in how determine soil moisture. Field samples of soil are collected and weighed, with water content, and after the soil has been dried. The difference is the weight of soil moisture. In this instance, gravimetric means determining the amount of moisture in the soil by weight. Learning Objectives: After completing this module, you will be able to: •Explain why soil moisture is worth studying •Determine a schedule for taking this measurement •Choose a sampling pattern •Take soil moisture samples •Measure gravimetric soil moisture content •Report these data to GLOBE •Visualize these data using GLOBE’s Visualization Site Estimated time needed for completion of this module: 1.5 hours 1 The Role of Soil Moisture in the Environment Soil acts like a sponge spread across the land surface. It absorbs rain and snowmelt, slows run-off and helps to control flooding. The absorbed water is held on soil particle surfaces and in pore spaces between particles. This water is available for use by plants. Some of this water evaporates back into the air; some of this water is transpired by plants; some drains through the soil into groundwater. 2 Why your measurements matter: With this measurement, students may investigate how soil moisture: • Relates to precipitation • Relates to surface, soil, and/or air temperatures • How soil moisture varies diurnally and annually as well as over days or weeks • How soil moisture relates to plant phenology Image credit: NASA3 How your measurements can help us understand interactions of the soil with the rest of the Earth system Soil data field campaign, Yanco, Australia.
    [Show full text]
  • Scopes and Limits of Soil Evaluation in Urban Planning Procedures Markus TUSCH, Clemens GEITNER and Jörn DITTFURTH Mag
    reviewed paper A Thematic Soil Plan for the City of Munich – Scopes and Limits of Soil Evaluation in Urban Planning Procedures Markus TUSCH, Clemens GEITNER and Jörn DITTFURTH Mag. Markus Tusch, University of Innsbruck, Inst. of Geography, Innrain 52, A-6020 Innsbruck, [email protected] 1 SOIL AS COMPONENT OF THE URBAN ECOSYSTEM Soil as the top layer of the earth’s crust, formed by mineral particles, organic matter, water, air and living organisms performs a variety of ecological, social and economic functions vital for human life. Nevertheless the ecological value and significance of intact soils is often grossly underrated compared to the economic value of land. Especially in densely populated areas soils and their manifold functions are impaired and endangered by sealing, compaction, contamination or outright removal. In Germany the conservation of soil is therefore regulated by the German Federal Soil Protection Act (BBodSchG 1998). However, until recently soil played but a minor role in urban planning procedures mainly due to a lack of interpreted, planning- oriented information concerning urban soils and their natural functions. Information about "soil" is usually limited to the economic value, i.e. real estate value or land price, to known or assumed contaminations, to the degree of surface sealing and to the mechanical and geohydrological suitability as building ground. Comparatively little is known about the potential of local soils to develop biotopes for animals and plants, about soil performances in carbon, nutrient and water cycles – e.g. the capacity to infiltrate rain water – or soils’ capacity to filter, buffer and transform potentially harmful substances.
    [Show full text]
  • Hazleton Pennsylvania State Soil
    Hazleton Pennsylvania State Soil Soil Science Society of America Introduction Many states have a designated state bird, flower, fish, tree, rock, etc. And, many states also have a state soil – one that has significance or is important to the state. The Hazleton is the official state soil of Pennsylvania. Let’s explore how the Hazleton is important to Pennsylvania. History The selection of Hazleton as the official state soil began in 1995 when the Pennsylvania Association of Professional Soil Scientists (PAPSS) and the Pennsylvania Natural Re- sources Conservation Service (NRCS) collaborated on efforts to prepare for the National Soil Survey Centennial Celebration in 1999. Pennsylvania’s Soil Survey Centennial was celebrated in 2000 based on the first soil survey published in 1900 for “The Lancaster Area”. In order to increase awareness of our most important natural resource, many states developed plans to designate state soils as part of the centennial celebration. The criteria for selecting a state soil included: The soil series must be named for a Penn- sylvania location. The Hazleton was one of several other Pennsylvania soils considered including Berks, Gilpin and Penn soils. However, Hazleton was more extensive in total acreage (approximately 1.5 million acres) and in located in more counties (34 of the 67) mapped across the state. Hazleton was first characterized on the sandstone ridges and sideslopes near the city of Hazleton, Pennsylvania. Based on the selection cri- teria and review by the membership of the Pennsylvania Association of Profes- sional Soil Scientists, the Hazleton soil series was recommended as the state soil for Pennsylvania in 1998.
    [Show full text]
  • Soil Erodibility in the Conditions of Slovakia
    Vedecké práce 2005 27 Proceedings Proceedings No. 27, 2005 Soil Science and Conservation Research Institute, Bratislava Vedecké práce č. 27, 2005 Výskumného ústavu pôdoznalectva a ochrany pôdy, Bratislava Opponent: prof. Ing. Bohdan Juráni, CSc. Vydal: Výskumný ústav pôdoznalectva a ochrany pôdy Bratislava, 2005 Content Proceedings 2005 J. BALKOVIČ, R. SKALSKÝ Raster Database of Agricultural Soils of Slovakia – RBPPS ...................................................... 5 R. BUJNOVSKÝ Mitigation of Soil Degradation Processes in the Slovak Republic within Framework of UN Convention to Combat Desertification .................. 13 J. HALAS Investigation of Soil Compaction within a Selected Field by Measurement of Penetrometric Soil Resistance........................................................... 23 V. HUTÁR, M. JAĎUĎA Soil Mapping in Middle Scale (1:50 000), Several Basic Principles of Soil Parameters as Regionalized Variable in 2Dimension ........................ 29 B. ILAVSKÁ, P. JAMBOR Soil Erodibility in the Conditions of Slovakia................... 35 M. JAĎUĎA Assessment, Description of Soil Profile in the Chemical Waste Dump and its Impact on Urban Planning ....................................................... 43 J. KOBZA, I. MAJOR Comparison of Podzolic Soils in Different Geographical and Climatic Conditions, and Problem of their Classification................................................... 51 J. MAKOVNÍKOVÁ Limit Values Indicating Vulnerability of Ecological Functions of Fluvisols in the Region Stredné Pohronie ......................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Classification of Organic Soils – FHWA/IN/JTRP-2008/2
    FHWA/IN/JTRP-2008/2 Final Report CLASSIFICATION OF ORGANIC SOILS Pao-Tsung Huang Mital Patel Maria Caterina Santagata Antonio Bobet September 2009 Final Report FHWA/IN/JTRP-2008/2 CLASSIFICATION OF ORGANIC SOILS by Pao-Tsung Huang Graduate Research Assistant Mital Patel Graduate Research Assistant Maria Caterina Santagata Assistant Professor and Antonio Bobet Associate Professor School of Civil Engineering Purdue University Joint Transportation Research Program Project No. C-36-36TT File No. 6-14-45 SPR-3005 Conducted in Cooperation with the Indiana Department of Transportation and the U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration The contents of this report reflect the views of the authors who are responsible for the facts and the accuracy of the data presented herein. The contents do not necessarily reflect the official views or policies of the Indiana Department of Transportation or the Federal Highway Administration at the time of publication. This report does not constitute a standard, specification, or regulation. School of Civil Engineering Purdue University September 2009 TECHNICAL REPORT STANDARD TITLE PAGE 1. Report No. 2. Government Accession No. 3. Recipient's Catalog No. FHWA/IN/JTRP-2008/2 4. Title and Subtitle 5. Report Date Classification of Organic Soils September 2009 6. Performing Organization Code 7. Author(s) 8. Performing Organization Report No. Pao-Tsung Huang, Mital Patel, Maria Caterina Santagata, and Antonio Bobet FHWA/IN/JTRP-2008/2 9. Performing Organization Name and Address 10. Work Unit No. Joint Transportation Research Program 1284 Civil Engineering Building Purdue University West Lafayette, IN 47907-1284 11. Contract or Grant No.
    [Show full text]