DOCSLIB.ORG

Civilisation Britannique L II

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Civilisation Britannique L II Civilisation britannique L II TOPIC I : THE INSTITUTIONAL ENVIRONMENT OF BRITAIN In Britain they speak of the constitution as being uncodified or flexible, whereas the American and the French systems are based on a single document. In its widest sense the constitution covers the various institutions that make up its core : the Crown, Parliament, the Government and Administration, and the Judiciary. More details The British constitution does not adhere to the doctrine of the separation of powers as practiced in the US and France. In the USA the constitution is enshrined in a document and the Supreme Court has the power to declare legislation unconstitutional while the President has the power to veto legislation. In this way congress(the legislature) is controlled or checked by the Supreme Court (the judiciary) and the Government (the executive). The three main branches of the constitution in Britain are the Legislature (Parliament, the House of Lords, and the House of Commons), the Executive (Government : Prime Minister, the Cabinet and the Civil Service) and the Judiciary (the law i.e, the courts, House of Lords). In this system, all members of the Executive must also be members of the House of Commons and House of Lords. I. The Role of Parliament Parliament can be traced back to the great assemblies of the middle ages when powerful magnates gave advice to the King and acknowledged the decisions. Since the end of the 18th century, the prerogative powers of the Crown have been gradually exercised by Ministers, and Parliament has become accountable to the electorate. A. The Monarchy Two of the most important powers of the monarchy relate to the opening and dissolution of Parliament. The former is associated with the Queen ‘s speech which, according to convention is written by the Government of the day. The second operates before the calling of a general election or after a major defeat of 1 the Government in the House of Commons. The Crown also appoints and dismisses Ministers on the advice of the Prime Minister. In general the Monarch gives automatic consent for all the bills passed in parliament. But as Head of State, the sovereign has in certain times of crisis played a constitutional role in helping to select Prime Ministers. Prime Ministers meet the Queen on a weekly basis to keep her abreast of political developments, and to ask for her advice, In recent years the popularity of the monarch has plummeted. A poll published in the summer of 1997 revealed that only 48 per cent of the respondents thought that Britain would be worse off if monarchy was abolished… The decline is partly due to the undignified behaviour of younger members of the family, but also far more to substantial problems, such as the cost of the institution. Parliament used to finance the royal family through the annual Civil List (list of sums appropriated annually by parliament to pay the expenses of the sovereign and his or her household) to whom money is paid by the government , while further expenses on behalf of the monarch were made by various ministerial departments. In spite of the immense wealth of theCrown the Queen used not to pay any income tax. But as from 1993, the Queen agreed that the Civil List should be reduced to include only herself, the Duke of Edinburgh and the Queen Mother, and announced that she would be paying income tax. Public sympathy for the royal family was not restored by the death of Princess Diana, princess of Wales in 1997. However, the death of the Queen Mother in 2002, along with the Golden Jubilee (the 50th anniversary of the Queen’s accession to power in 1952) of the same year, led to an upsurge of nostalgia and affection in public opinion. This mood was further reinforced when Elizabeth II turned 80 in 2006, which suggests that the existence of the monarchy is not a contentious issue today. B. The House of Lords Britain not only has a hereditary monarchy but also an Upper House, the membership of which is based largely on the same principle. The present House of Lords consists of the following groups. 1. Hereditary peers of the Realm. Those who have inherited their titles. number 814 2. Hereditary peers of Scotland 3. The Lords spiritual 4. The Lords in appeal 5. Life peers 2 The Lords spiritual (6) comprise the Archbishopsof York and Canterbury, the bishops of London, Durham and Winchester. The Lords in appeal known as the law lords, perform the judicial work of the House of Lords when it seats as a Court of Appeal. But recently their function has been taken over by a new Supreme Court of the United Kingdom that was officially installed on October 1st, 2009. Lastly there are the life peers, about 590, who are usually appointed on the advice of the Prime Minister after a long period of public service. This group often includes ex-Prime Ministers, Cabinet Ministers and civil servants. They are appointed because they have a certain expertise in their respective domains and can help the government. There is an ongoing debate about how to make that chamber democratic and more representative. C. The House of Commons The House of Commons is the major legislative and debating body of the country. Representation in the present House of Commons is governed by the Representation of the People Act of 1985. There are now 646 Mps. An MP is elected either in a general election, (within every five years of Parliament) or a by election, the latter taking place usually after the death or the resignation of a sitting member. The influence of the House of Commons comes from its ability to speak to and for the people. An MPs’ day in the House begins in the early afternoon and can go on throughout the night. Half of the time is taken up with debating stages of a bill and raising local constituency issues. The rest is usually associated with various duties including oral questions to ministers, motions to discuss important current issues, scrutinizing of Government expenditure and Private members’ bills. The Speaker of the House, who is an MP protects its rights and is responsible for order and discipline during debates. He is elected by a secret ballot since 2009. He acts as an adjudicator in all procedural matters and has the power to temporarily evict a sitting member if he feels convention has been breached. When a debate is concluded, the Speaker puts the question to the House by rising from his chair and saying , « The question is… » He will then ask for a voice vote either for or against the question and makes a judgement as to who 3 has the majority. If the house agrees with his decison the debate ends. However if a party feels the need for a more formal vote, the Speaker will call for a second vote. The main function of the House is to scrutinize and analyse Government policies and actions through the conventions of questions in formal debates or in committees. The purpose of a question is to « obtain information and press for action » There are many types of questions : The usual one is the ORAL QUESTION although in fact the great majority of such questions are given written answers. But the most obvious and adversarial quesion time is the half hour each Wednesday afternoon when the Prime Minister has to answer MPs’ questions. During this time the Leader of the Opposition (the largest minority party in the House) is given a special opportunity to question the Prime Minister. This convention allows the backbenchers (MPs who do not hold office) to question ministers and to put their constituents’ views across. The committees also have a critical function in the detailed discussion that surrounds a piece of legislation.. Here MPs examine proposals of legislation and recommend revisions and changes.This is done outside the chamber and is part of the cross-examination process. Once a bill passes its second reading in the House of Commons it must be considered by a committee of the house which has responsibility for examining each clause and suggest improvemens and amendments. There are many types of bills • Public bills Bills that affect the entire community and are part of the general law of the country. Such bills are in general introduced by the minister responsible for the policy and would usually have been foreshadowed in the Queen’s speech. • Private bills They are introduced to change the law in respect of a particular locality or company. Unlike a public bill, such bills do not seek to affect the country as a whole. • Money bills They are normally associated with the Chancellor of the Exchequer in the form of budget proposal : 4 • Private member’s bills : Certain Fridays of the Parliamentary session are alloted to these bills. MPs not in government are allowed to bring in their own legislation and are chosen by ballot. II. THE LEGISLATIVE PROCESS Parliament’s main role is to approve legislation.Bills often range from simple administrative proposals to highly controversial political changes, such as the privatization of nationalized industries or the introduction ofLocal Government finance. Ideas for new legislation can come from a variety of sources, for instance party advisers and professional bodies, but most bills originate in the parties’ electoral manifesto, which embodies most of its law making intentions. A. The Passage of a bill A bill goes through many readings in the House of Commons. Then it goes to the House of Lords and after new many readings it is given the Royal Assent.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Thomas Prince, the Puritan Past, and New England's Future, 1660-1736
    W&M ScholarWorks Dissertations, Theses, and Masters Projects Theses, Dissertations, & Master Projects 2011 The Wondrous Chain of Providence: Thomas Prince, the Puritan Past, and New England's Future, 1660-1736 Thomas Joseph Gillan College of William & Mary - Arts & Sciences Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.wm.edu/etd Part of the United States History Commons Recommended Citation Gillan, Thomas Joseph, "The Wondrous Chain of Providence: Thomas Prince, the Puritan Past, and New England's Future, 1660-1736" (2011). Dissertations, Theses, and Masters Projects. Paper 1539626655. https://dx.doi.org/doi:10.21220/s2-rkeb-ec16 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses, Dissertations, & Master Projects at W&M ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations, Theses, and Masters Projects by an authorized administrator of W&M ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The Wondrous Chain of Providence: Thomas Prince, the Puritan Past, and New England’s Future, 1660-1736 Thomas Joseph Gillan Winter Springs, Florida Bachelor of Arts, University of Central Florida, 2008 A Thesis presented to the Graduate Faculty of the College of William and Mary in Candidacy for the Degree of Master of Arts Lyon G. Tyler Department of History The College of William and Mary May 2011 APPROVAL PAGE This Thesis is submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts Thomas Joseph GillaiT"'J Approved by the Com^^ ^ ^ March, 2011 Committee Chair Associate Professor Chandos M. Brown, History The College of WrNiam and Mary Professor Ifhristopher Grasso, History The College of William and Mary Assistant Professor Nicholas S.
    [Show full text]
  • The Maryland Disease: Popish Plots and Imperial Politics in the Seventeeth
    The Maryland Disease: Popish Plots and Imperial Politics in the Seventeeth Century Courtesy Collection of the of Maryland State Archives By Owen Stanwood The Occasional Papers of The Center for the Study of Democracy Volume 4, Number 1, Fall 2011 The Center for the Study of Democracy: A Better Understanding of Maryland and the World Although we often focus on contemporary issues associated with democracy and liberty, the Center for the Study of Democracy was originally inspired by the historical importance of St. Mary’s City and the discussion of innovative 17th-century ideas about politics that helped establish effective civil government in the Maryland colony. This occasional paper brings us back to our 17th-century roots. Among the most important principles of civil government instituted at St. Mary’s City is ‘freedom of conscience’—a principle that remains in practice today and one that continues to act as the bedrock for many other core democratic values in the United States. This principle not only provides support for democratic liberties concerning freedom of speech and freedom of the press, but also directly supports the legal notion of separation of church and state. In the early years of Maryland’s founding, colonists, through the Assembly of Maryland, officially separated religion from civil government by passing An Act Concerning Religion. This act, as Judge Thomas Penfield Jackson points out “…represented the first time in the English-speaking world that government formally renounced by legislative enactment the right to dictate to its citizens what they must believe or how they must evince it.” It allowed settlers of different Christian faiths to vote and hold public office without a religious test and it remains a foundational civil liberty in the United States today; citizens of all faiths are entitled to freely participate in our democracy, irrespective of religious beliefs.
    [Show full text]
  • RIVERS, ENERGY, and the REMAKING of COLONIAL NEW ENGLAND by ZACHARY M
    FLOWING POWER: RIVERS, ENERGY, AND THE REMAKING OF COLONIAL NEW ENGLAND By ZACHARY M. BENNETT A dissertation submitted to the School of Graduate Studies Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey In partial fulfillment of the requirements For the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Graduate Program in History Written under the direction of James Delbourgo And approved by New Brunswick, New Jersey May, 2019 ABSTRACT OF THE DISSERTATION Flowing Power: Rivers, Energy, and the Remaking of Colonial New England by Zachary M. Bennett Dissertation Director: James Delbourgo This dissertation considers how river energy was a source of authority in colonial New England. The caloric, kinetic, and mechanical energy people derived from rivers was necessary for survival in New England’s forbidding environment. During the initial stages of colonization, both Europeans and Indians struggled to secure strategic positions on waterways because they were the only routes capable of accommodating trade from the coast to the interior. European and Native peoples came into conflict by the late seventeenth century as they overextended the resource base. Exerting dominion in the ensuing wars on New England’s frontiers was directly tied to securing strategic river spaces since the masters of these places determined the flow of communication and food for the surrounding territory. Following British military conquest, colonists aggressively dammed rivers to satisfy the energy demands of their growing population. These dams eviscerated fish runs, shunting access to waterpower away from Native Americans and yeoman farmers. The transformation of New England’s hydrology was a critical factor in the dispossession indigenous peoples before the Revolution and essential in laying the legal groundwork for the region’s industrial future.
    [Show full text]
  • Plymouth Colony
    Name: ____________________________________________ Date: _______________________ Plymouth Colony Overview: Plymouth Colony was an English colony from 1620-1691. It is also known as New Plymouth or Plymouth Bay Colony. It was one of the earliest successful colonies in North America and took part in the first Thanksgiving in 1621. Origins of Colonists: The original group of settlers were known as separatists because they had gone against the King of England and the Anglican Church. The group was under religious persecution to leave England. In 1619 they obtained a land patent from the London Virginia Company to let them settle a colony in North America. In 1620 the colonists left for America on the ships Mayflower and Speedwell. Leaving: The two ships left South Hampton England on August 15th, 1620. The Mayflower had 90 passengers and the Speedwell had 30 passengers. The Speedwell had immediate problems and had to go back. The Mayflower returned and it finally left for America with 102 passengers on September 16th, 1620. Voyage: The voyage from England to America at these times would typically take 2 months. In the first month the Mayflower had smooth sailing. In the second month they were hit by a strong winter storm which killed two of the passengers. Arrival: The Mayflower first arrived at Provincetown Harbor on November 11th, 1620. The following day Susanna White gave birth to Peregrine White who was the first child born to a pilgrim in the New World. While exploring the area they ran into a Native American tribe and went looking for another area. The ship soon came across an area they agreed to settle.
    [Show full text]
  • Property, Identity and Place in Seventeenth-Century New England
    Property, Identity and Place in Seventeenth-Century New England A thesis submitted to the School of History of the University of East Anglia in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy By Elizabeth Jean Southard 26 July 2013 © This copy of the thesis has been supplied on condition that anyone who consults it is understood to recognise that its copyright rests with the author and that no quotation from the thesis, nor any information derived therefrom, may be published without the author’s prior, written consent. Abstract This thesis presents a study of the construction and defence of English settler-colonies in New England during the seventeenth century, focusing upon the relationship between ordinary people and their environment. This work initially examines the pre- exploration reports and the first few decades of settlement and how commodification and naming practices helped in translating the landscape into a familiar, useful and, most importantly, English place. This continues in Chapter Two with a study of the distribution and construction of towns, boundaries and familiar patterns of agricultural usage. This patterning reveals how early settlers perceived their world, and how they secured traditional English customs and patterns onto this uncultivated landscape. The final two chapters will examine challenges to this system, from within New England and across the Atlantic. Chapter Three focuses on the challenge of native land rights, which threatened to undermine the initial basis of conquest and discovery as claims to the land. However, this was overcome due the flexibility of narratives of ownership and possession and the addition of native land rights to English property regimes.
    [Show full text]
  • New England Colonies in the Seventeenth Century
    AP U.S. History: Unit 2.2 Student Edition New England Colonies in the Seventeenth Century I. Protestant Reformation and the eventual rise of Puritanism Use Space Below for Notes A. 1517, Martin Luther began his break from the Catholic church; signaled the birth of Protestantism 1. Luther declared the Bible alone was the source of God's word. 2. Faith alone would determine salvation; he denounced the authority of the pope. 3. The Reformation came to dominate European politics well into the next century. B. John Calvin elaborated on Luther's ideas and founded Calvinism in his Institutes of the Christian Religion (1536) 1. God was all powerful and all-good. 2. Humans, due to original sin, were weak and wicked. 3. Predestination a. God was all-knowing and knew beforehand who was going to heaven or hell. The "elect" were chosen by God to have eternal salvation. b. "Good works" (such as following the sacraments of the Catholic Church) did not determine salvation. c. However, one could not act immoral since no one knew their status before God. d. A conversion experience (an intense identifiable personal experience with God) was seen to be a sign from God that one had been chosen. "Visible saints": After conversion, people expected to lead "sanctified" lives as a model for the community. C. Church of England and the Puritans 1. King Henry VIII broke ties with Roman Catholic church in the 1530's and became head of the newly formed Church of England or Anglican Church. 2. Puritans were Protestants seeking to reform the Anglican Church by removing its Catholic elements and excluding people who were not committed.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter Preview
    HISTORY OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA-I Dr. Hemanta Kumar Mohapatra M.A., Ph.D Retd. Associate Professor of History Odisha Education Service ISO 9001:2008 CERTIFIED © Author No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording and/or otherwise without the prior written permission of the author and the publisher. First Edition : 2018 Published by : Mrs. Meena Pandey for Himalaya Publishing House Pvt. Ltd., “Ramdoot”, Dr. Bhalerao Marg, Girgaon, Mumbai - 400 004. Phone: 022-23860170, 23863863; Fax: 022-23877178 E-mail: [email protected]; Website: www.himpub.com Branch Offices : New Delhi : “Pooja Apartments”, 4-B, Murari Lal Street, Ansari Road, Darya Ganj, New Delhi - 110 002. Phone: 011-23270392, 23278631; Fax: 011-23256286 Nagpur : Kundanlal Chandak Industrial Estate, Ghat Road, Nagpur - 440 018. Phone: 0712-2738731, 3296733; Telefax: 0712-2721216 Bengaluru : Plot No. 91-33, 2nd Main Road, Seshadripuram, Behind Nataraja Theatre, Bengaluru - 560 020. Phone: 080-41138821; Mobile: 09379847017, 09379847005 Hyderabad : No. 3-4-184, Lingampally, Besides Raghavendra Swamy Matham, Kachiguda, Hyderabad - 500 027. Phone: 040-27560041, 27550139 Chennai : New No. 48/2, Old No. 28/2, Ground Floor, Sarangapani Street, T. Nagar, Chennai - 600 012. Mobile: 09380460419 Pune : “Laksha” Apartment, First Floor, No. 527, Mehunpura, Shaniwarpeth (Near Prabhat Theatre), Pune - 411 030. Phone: 020-24496323, 24496333; Mobile: 09370579333 Lucknow : House No. 731, Shekhupura Colony, Near B.D. Convent School, Aliganj, Lucknow - 226 022. Phone: 0522-4012353; Mobile: 09307501549 Ahmedabad : 114, “SHAIL”, 1st Floor, Opp. Madhu Sudan House, C.G.
    [Show full text]
  • THE PLYMOUTH COLONY PATENT: Setting the Stage by Peggy M
    THE PLYMOUTH COLONY PATENT: setting the stage by Peggy M. Baker, Director & Librarian Pilgrim Society & Pilgrim Hall Museum 2007 The legal arrangements under which the Pilgrims journeyed to America and established their colony, and which, ultimately, resulted in the colony’s demise in 1692 are among the most confusing aspects of the Plymouth experience. The “correct” way to proceed, as outlined in the surviving documents (and many documents do not survive), did not always reflect how affairs were actually conducted. And the entire system of establishing and governing colonies was so new and experimental that rules were often changed to meet new circumstances (and information on how and why these changes occurred is generally incomplete). As a result, scholars frequently disagree about what actually did happen! What follows is, therefore, not a definitive answer but the scenario that seems most likely. First, let’s set the stage. In the 16th century, Europe expanded its boundaries as voyages of exploration brought increased geographical knowledge and an interest in faraway lands. At the same time, an increase in personal wealth and the development of capitalism led to the rise of both a very wealthy landed aristocracy and a rich merchant class possessing money (and, therefore, political clout) and the ambition to make even more money. The marriage of these factors resulted in new “financial opportunities” - schemes by which adventuresome aristocrats and rich merchants would make a profit on their money by investing in colonies. Making money in colonies required a lot of money to begin with, more than even the richest aristocrats or merchants had.
    [Show full text]
  • Exploring the Bounds of Liberty
    Exploring the Bounds of Liberty Exploring the Bounds of LIBERTY Political Writings of Colonial British America from the Glorious Revolution to the American Revolution 2 volume i Edited and with an Introduction by Jack P. Greene and Craig B. Yirush Latin Translations by Kathleen Alvis liberty fund This book is published by Liberty Fund, Inc., a foundation established to encourage study of the ideal of a society of free and responsible individuals. The cuneiform inscription that serves as our logo and as the design motif for our endpapers is the earliest-known written appearance of the word “freedom” (amagi), or “liberty.” It is taken from a clay document written about 2300 b.c. in the Sumerian city-state of Lagash. C ompilation, introduction, translations, editorial matter, and index © 2018 by Liberty Fund, Inc. Front: “Vintage engraving of Boston Harbour showing the Dartmouth, which was one of the ships boarded during the Boston Tea Party, a political protest by the Sons of Liberty in Boston, a city in the British colony of Massachusetts, against the tax policy of the British government and the East India Company, which controlled all the tea imported into the colonies.” Used by permission © iStock.com/duncan 1890. Spine: Library of Congress, dated 1758: “A general map of the middle British colonies in America: Viz. Virginia, Maryland, Delaware, Pensilvania, New-Jersey, New-York, Connecticut, and Rhode-Island: Of Aquanishuonigy the country of the Confederate Indians comprehending Aquanishuonigy proper, their places of residence, Ohio and Tuchsochruntie their deer hunting countries, Couchsachrage and Skaniadarade, their beaver hunting countries, of the Lakes Erie, Ontario, and Champlain, .
    [Show full text]
  • Anti-Catholicism and Colonial New England" (2015)
    John Carroll University Carroll Collected Masters Essays Theses, Essays, and Senior Honors Projects Spring 2015 NEW ENGLAND’S GOD: ANTI- CATHOLICISM AND COLONIAL NEW ENGLAND Matthew .J Nowak John Carroll University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://collected.jcu.edu/mastersessays Part of the History Commons Recommended Citation Nowak, Matthew J., "NEW ENGLAND’S GOD: ANTI-CATHOLICISM AND COLONIAL NEW ENGLAND" (2015). Masters Essays. 17. http://collected.jcu.edu/mastersessays/17 This Essay is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses, Essays, and Senior Honors Projects at Carroll Collected. It has been accepted for inclusion in Masters Essays by an authorized administrator of Carroll Collected. For more information, please contact [email protected]. NEW ENGLAND’S GOD: ANTI-CATHOLICISM AND COLONIAL NEW ENGLAND An Essay Submitted to the Office of Graduate Studies College of Arts & Sciences of John Carroll University in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts By Matthew J. Nowak 2015 Introduction The Puritans left England because of Roman Catholicism. Either because of perceived threats by Catholics or Pseudo-Catholics or their detestation of the continued presence of Catholic influence in church, government, and society, Puritans believed there existed a better way of life outside the sway of Catholicism. The people who left England during the seventeenth century and founded the colonies of New England – Massachusetts, Connecticut, Plymouth, Rhode Island, and New Haven – did so in the spirit of religion and reform. Born from the turmoil of religious persecution and political experimentalism, New England Puritanism – which is the primary focus of this discussion – created a unique overarching society that focused on godliness, Biblical law, substantive justice, participation, and cohesion.
    [Show full text]
  • How Americans Invented Modern Money, 1607-1692
    How Americans Invented Modern Money, 1607-1692 Dror Goldberg Department of Economics, Bar Ilan University, Israel Department of Economics, Leonard N. Stern School of Business, New York University (visiting, Spring 2012) April 2012 Abstract English America experienced the fastest monetary evolution in history. Within less than a century, simple commodity money was followed by sophisticated commodity money, coins, banknotes, and an original invention of fiat money – which spread from there to the rest of the world. I attribute this evolution to English regulation. Regulation of religion in England and regulation of colonial currency, land, trade, piracy, and polity, inadvertently propelled the evolution of money in America and especially in Massachusetts through various channels, including the English revolutions and civil wars that turned colonial regulation on and off. 1 Note: This is a preliminary and incomplete sketch of a monograph I am writing under an advance contract with The University of Chicago Press for its new series “Markets and Governments in Economic History.” Much of this document is a 1:10 scale model of the book. Only the most general sources are listed in the end. Please do not cite without permission. Comments are welcomed at [email protected]. For we must consider that we shall be a city upon a hill. The eyes of all people are upon us. - John Winthrop, Governor of the Massachusetts Bay Company, 1630 In this extremity they presently found out an expedient, which may serve as an example, for any people in other parts of the world, whose distresses may call for a sudden supply of money to carry them through any important expedition.
    [Show full text]
  • In the Wake of War: Violence, Identity, and Cultural Change In
    IN THE WAKE OF WAR: VIOLENCE, IDENTITY, AND CULTURAL CHANGE IN PURITAN MASSACHUSETTS, 1676-1713 A Thesis by CHARLES ROBERT HEATON Submitted to the Office of Graduate Studies of Texas A&M University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF ARTS August 2011 Major Subject: History In the Wake of War: Violence, Identity, and Cultural Change in Puritan Massachusetts, 1676-1713 Copyright 2011 Charles Robert Heaton IN THE WAKE OF WAR: VIOLENCE, IDENTITY, AND CULTURAL CHANGE IN PURITAN MASSACHUSETTS, 1676-1713 A Thesis by CHARLES ROBERT HEATON Submitted to the Office of Graduate Studies of Texas A&M University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF ARTS Approved by: Chair of Committee, April Lee Hatfield Committee Members, Cynthia A. Bouton James Burk Head of Department, Walter L. Buenger August 2011 Major Subject: History iii ABSTRACT In the Wake of War: Violence, Identity, and Cultural Change in Puritan Massachusetts, 1676-1713. (August 2011) Charles Robert Heaton, B.A., Methodist University Chair of Advisory Committee: Dr. April Lee Hatfield This thesis seeks to grasp how King Philip‟s War influenced cultural evolution in Massachusetts in order to determine whether it produced a culture of violence and conflict amongst the Anglo-Puritan inhabitants of the Massachusetts Bay colony following the conflict. Specifically, this work uses primary sources produced by European inhabitants of Massachusetts Bay to examine the period between 1676 and 1713. Chapter II examines the impact of King Philip‟s War on the evolution of colonists‟ attitudes towards Indians by tracing the development of scalp bounties in Massachusetts.
    [Show full text]