<<

packaging in the : A comparison by flavor and flavor capsule presence

Jennifer Brown, MPH Katherine Clegg Smith, PhD Meng Zhu, PhD Meghan Moran, PhD Connie Hoe, PhD Joanna Cohen, PhD

Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health Funding source: This work was supported with funding from Bloomberg Philanthropies’ Bloomberg Initiative to Reduce Use (Bloomberg.org).

Industry funding: None

Off medication uses discussed: None

©©2019, 2014, Johns Hopkins UniverUniversity.sity. All rights reserved. Background • 22.7% of adult population in the Philippines smokes

• Philippines has a high market share

Source: World Health Organization

©©2019, 2014, Johns Hopkins UniverUniversity.sity. All rights reserved. Flavored

• Menthol cigarettes are associated with initiation and decreased likelihood of quitting and staying quit

• Flavor capsule cigarettes associated with misperceptions of harm and appeal to youth

©©2019, 2014, Johns Hopkins UniverUniversity.sity. All rights reserved. Marketing • Cigarette packaging is an important marketing tool

• No research has examined difference between menthol and non- packaging

©©2019, 2014, Johns Hopkins UniverUniversity.sity. All rights reserved. Objective To compare and describe the similarities and differences in packaging components being used between packs that vary by flavor and flavor capsule presence that were on the market in the Philippines in 2016.

©©2019, 2014, Johns Hopkins UniverUniversity.sity. All rights reserved. Research questions

• What structural components (pack type, opening style, shape) are used to package cigarettes?

• What graphic components (color, imagery, descriptors) are used on cigarette packaging?

• Are there differences and/or similarities between groups of packaging that vary by flavor and capsule presence and the structural and graphic components used?

©©2019, 2014, Johns Hopkins UniverUniversity.sity. All rights reserved. Methods

©©2019, 2014, Johns Hopkins UniverUniversity.sity. All rights reserved. Methods • Packs coded for structural elements and graphic components

• Quantitative content analysis

• Compared prevalence of structural elements and graphic components across categories of packs (distinguished by flavor and flavor capsule) using Fisher’s exact test

©©2019, 2014, Johns Hopkins UniverUniversity.sity. All rights reserved. Variable Definition No flavor No indication that pack is flavored and no distinguishable flavor/taste/aroma other than tobacco is displayed on or stick “Menthol” or “mint” appears as a descriptor on Menthol or mint cigarette pack or stick Characterizing flavor A characterizing flavor other than “menthol” or other than mint or “mint” is displayed as a descriptor on the cigarette menthol packaging or stick, including, but not limited to caramel//, /canella or other spice, /, fruit or citrus, , alcoholic beverage, energy drink Non-characterizing Indication that pack is flavored but no flavor distinguishable flavor/taste/aroma other than tobacco is displayed on cigarette pack or stick Flavor capsule pack Pack that indicates in any way that the user is able to change the stick flavor (e.g. convertibles, click and roll, activate)

©©2019, 2014, Johns Hopkins UniverUniversity.sity. All rights reserved. Results (N=75)

FLAVOR FLAVOR CAPSULE No flavor Menthol or mint Characterizing Non- flavor – not characterizing menthol or mint flavor

No

n/a n/a (n=0) (n=0)

Group 1: Non-flavor Group 2: Menthol non- non-capsule (n=36) capsule (n=23) Yes

n/a (n=0)

Group 3: Menthol Group 4: Non-characterizing or other flavor capsule (n=10) capsule (n=6)

©©2019, 2014, Johns Hopkins UniverUniversity.sity. All rights reserved. Results – Structural elements

Group 1: Group 2: Group 3: Group 4: 1 1 1 2 2 3 Non- Menthol Menthol Non- vs vs vs vs vs vs flavored non-capsule capsule (n=10) characterizing 2 3 4 3 4 4 non- (n=23) or other flavor capsule capsule (n=6) (n=36) n(%) n(%) n(%) n(%) Pack type* ** Hard 27 (75.0) 11 (47.8) 10 (100) 6 (100) Soft 9 (25.0) 12 (52.2) 0 (0) 0 (0) Traditional 36 (100) 23 (100) 10 (100) 6 (100) shape Slim pack* 2 (5.6) 1 (4.3) 0 (0) 2 (33.3)

*p<0.05; values are from Fisher’s exact test **p<0.008, adjusted for multiple comparisons; values are from Fisher’s exact tests

©©2019, 2014, Johns Hopkins UniverUniversity.sity. All rights reserved. Group 1: Non- Group 2: Group 3: Group 4: flavored non- Menthol non- Menthol capsule Non-characterizing capsule (n=36) capsule (n=23) (n=10) or other flavor capsule (n=6)

n(%) n(%) n(%) n(%) Pack type* Hard 27 (75.0) 11 (47.8) 10 (100) 6 (100) Soft 9 (25.0) 12 (52.2) 0 (0) 0 (0)

Examples of menthol non-capsule soft packs (group 2) Examples of menthol capsule hard packs (group 3)

©©2019, 2014, Johns Hopkins UniverUniversity.sity. All rights reserved. Results – Graphic components Group 1: Group 2: Group 3: Group 4: 1 1 1 2 2 3 Non-flavored Menthol Menthol Non- vs vs vs vs vs vs non-capsule non- capsule (n=10) characterizing 2 3 4 3 4 4 (n=36) capsule or other flavor (n=23) capsule(n=6) n(%) n(%) n(%) n(%) Green* 1 (2.8) 21 (91.3) 6 (60) 2 (33.3) ** **

Blue 9 (25.0) 2 (8.7) 5 (50) 2 (33.3)

Purple* 0 (0) 0 (0) 2 (20) 0 (0)

Masculine 1 (2.8) 0 (0) 0 (0) 1 (16.7) appeal Less harm 1 (2.8) 1 (4.3) 0 (0) 0 (0) “Taste” 3 (8.3) 1 (4.3) 2 (20) 2 (33.3) “Fresh”* 0 (0) 0 (0) 1 (10) 3 (50) ** ** “Cool/ice”* 0 (0) 1 (4.3) 3 (30) 1 (16.7) “Sensation” 0 (0) 1 (4.3) 2 (20) 0 (0) Technology* 3 (8.3) 1 (4.3) 10 (100) 6 (100) ** ** ** ** *p<0.05; values are from Fisher’s exact test **p<0.008, adjusted for multiple comparisons; values are from Fisher’s exact tests

©©2019, 2014, Johns Hopkins UniverUniversity.sity. All rights reserved. Group 1: Non- Group 2: Group 3: Group 4: flavored non- Menthol non- Menthol capsule Non-characterizing or capsule (n=36) capsule (n=23) (n=10) other flavor capsule(n=6) n(%) n(%) n(%) n(%) Green* 1 (2.8) 21 (91.3) 6 (60) 2 (33.3)

Example of green menthol non-capsule pack Example of green menthol capsule pack

©©2019, 2014, Johns Hopkins UniverUniversity.sity. All rights reserved. Group 1: Non- Group 2: Group 3: Group 4: flavored non- Menthol non- Menthol capsule Non-characterizing or capsule (n=36) capsule (n=23) (n=10) other flavor capsule(n=6) n(%) n(%) n(%) n(%) “Fresh”* 0 (0) 0 (0) 1 (10) 3 (50)

Examples of non-characterizing flavor capsule pack displaying “fresh”

©©2019, 2014, Johns Hopkins UniverUniversity.sity. All rights reserved. Group 1: Non- Group 2: Group 3: Group 4: flavored non- Menthol non- Menthol capsule Non-characterizing or capsule (n=36) capsule (n=23) (n=10) other flavor capsule(n=6) n(%) n(%) n(%) n(%) Technology* 3 (8.3) 1 (4.3) 10 (100) 6 (100)

Examples of menthol capsule packs using technology imagery

©©2019, 2014, Johns Hopkins UniverUniversity.sity. All rights reserved. Non-characterizing or other flavor capsule cigarettes (n=6)

2 other flavor capsule packs: Coffee flavor with ice coffee flavor and coffee flavor with coffee flavor

4 non- characterizing flavor capsule packs: “Fresh” and green color could potentially indicate menthol flavoring

©©2019, 2014, Johns Hopkins UniverUniversity.sity. All rights reserved. Strengths & limitations

+ First study to describe differences in packaging between menthol and non-menthol packs

+ Data collected in geographically and culturally diverse areas in the Philippines

- Sample was collected in 2016; likely changes to market

- Not able to confirm meaning of structural elements and graphic components to consumers

©©2019, 2014, Johns Hopkins UniverUniversity.sity. All rights reserved. Conclusions

• Different materials, color (green), descriptors (“fresh”, technology terms) and imagery (technology) are used on cigarette packaging to distinguish between cigarette types in the Philippines

• Findings highlight the need for a greater awareness of the potential for different packaging components to convey product characteristics to consumers, some that may be misleading or that are attractive to a new generation of smokers

• Can inform future policy as the Philippines and other countries consider bans on and displays at point-of-sale and adoption of

©©2019, 2014, Johns Hopkins UniverUniversity.sity. All rights reserved. Next steps

• Future research will explore consumer perceptions of menthol and flavor capsule cigarette packaging and assess whether distinguishing marketing features are associated with:  Attractiveness  Less harm  Intention to try

©©2019, 2014, Johns Hopkins UniverUniversity.sity. All rights reserved. Thank you! [email protected]

©©2019, 2014, Johns Hopkins UniverUniversity.sity. All rights reserved.