DOCSLIB.ORG

Health & Wellbeing Ward Profile Droylsden East

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Health & Wellbeing Ward Profile Droylsden East HEALTH & WELLBEING WARD PROFILE DROYLSDEN EAST Population 11,691 ♂49.0% ♀51.0% Male Population 5,723 Droylsden East Population (2.7% Since 2001) Female Population 5,968 (Tameside Male Population 49.1%) (Tameside Population +2.9% Since 2001) (Tameside Female Population 50.9%) Droylsden East is one of two Droylsden Wards that are located in the North-West of the borough to the north of Audenshaw and to the west of Ashton-under-Lyne. The population of Droylsden East increased by 2.7% between the 2001 and 2011 censuses. The proportion of the Droylsden population of white ethnicity is higher than the Tameside and England averages at 93.3%, with a lower proportion of the popula- tion categorised as Indian, Pakistani or Bangladeshi. Employment 62.2% 1.9% 12.3% Employment Rate Job Seekers Allowance Claimant Rate Out of Work Benefit Claimants 9th Highest in Tameside (Tameside Average=2.8%) (Tameside Average=13.6%) (Tameside Average=61.3%) The employment rate in Droylsden East is marginally higher than the Tameside Economic Status (% Aged 16-74) average, due to a higher proportion of people employed full time within the ward. Droylsden Droylsden Tameside England The proportion of the working age population claiming out of work benefits in East Droylsden East is lower than the Tameside average, which in turn is due in the East (%) (%) (%) (Number) main to a lower proportion of the working age population claiming Job Seekers Allowance. Claimant rates for the other rates of out of work benefits are approxi- Economically Active 6063 69.5 68.8 69.9 mate to the Tameside average Employee (Full Time) 3679 42.1 40.6 38.6 Employee (Part Time) 1141 13.1 13.2 13.7 Self-Employed 606 6.9 7.4 9.7 Unemployed 407 4.7 5.0 4.4 Full Time Student 230 2.6 2.5 3.4 Out of Work Benefit Claimants (% Aged 16-64) Economically Inactive 2667 30.5 31.2 30.1 Droylsden Droylsden Tameside England Job Seekers Allowance Claimants by Ward (% Aged 16-64) East East (%) (%) (%) (Number) Job Seekers Allowance (JSA) 165 1.9 2.8 2.8 Employment Support Allowance (ESA) 715 8.4 8.8 8 Lone Parents (claiming Income Sup- 135 1.6 1.6 1.4 port) Other 30 0.4 0.4 0.4 Total out of work benefit claimants 1045 12.3 13.6 12.6 Education and Training 29.2% 68.5% 57.9% Residents Aged 16+ without Early Years Foundation Stage: Pupils Achieving 5 GCSEs any Qualifications 5 Year Olds with a Good Level Including English and Maths at (Tameside Average=28.1%) of Development Grades A*-C (Tameside Average=59.9%) (Tameside Average=56.5%) Approximately 30% of the Droylsden East adult population does not have any qualifications. There is a lower proportion of Droylsden East residents whose highest achieved qualification is degree level or higher compared to the Tameside average. Within the 2011/12 school year, the proportion of pupils achieving 5 GCSEs including English and Maths at grades A*-C in Droylsden East was marginally higher than the Tameside average. The proportion of 5 year olds achieving a good level of development on the Early Years Foundation Stage in Droylsden East is the third highest out of all wards in Tameside. Highest Achieved Qualification (% Aged 16+) Droylsden Tameside England (%) East (%) (%) No Qualifications 29.2 28.1 22.5 Level 1: 1-4 GCSEs or Equivalent 17.5 16.1 13.3 Level 2: 5+ GCSEs or Equivalent 17.7 17.3 15.2 Level 3: 2+ A-Levels or Equivalent 12.5 12.1 12.4 Level 4 and above: Degree Level 15.0 17.5 27.4 Apprenticeship 4.5 3.6 3.6 3.7 5.7 5.7 Other Qualifications Housing 5,127 13.1% 2.9% Number of Households Fuel Poor Households Households without Central Heating (Tameside Average=14.1%) (Tameside Average=2.8%) The housing stock in Droylsden East consists in the majority of semi-detached Housing Type (% Households) and terraced housing. Two thirds of homes in Droylsden East are owner occu- pied, which is marginally higher than the Tameside average. Droylsden Tameside England East (%) (%) (%) Approximately 1 in 8 households in Droylsden East are fuel poor and 1 in 35 households in Droylsden East have no central heating. House: Detached 12.0 11.3 22.3 House: Semi-Detached 38.5 37.5 30.7 Levels of housing overcrowding in Droylsden East are approximate to the Tameside average. House: Terraced 31.7 35.7 24.5 Flat/ Apartment: Purpose Built Block 15.4 13.4 16.7 Flat/ Apartment: Converted House 1.4 1.2 4.3 Housing Tenure (% Households) Flat/ Apartment: In Commercial Building 1.0 0.9 1.1 Droylsden Tameside England Caravan or other Mobile/ Temporary Structure 0 <0.1 0.4 East (%) (%) (%) Owner Occupied 66.1 63.8 63.3 Modelled Percentage of Households in Fuel Poverty Private Rented 14.7 13.2 16.8 Social Rented 17.5 21.5 17.7 Shared Ownership (part owned and part rented) 0.4 0.3 0.8 Living Rent Free 1.3 1.1 1.3 Household Overcrowding (% Households) Droylsden Tameside England East (%) (%) (%) Room Overcrowding 6.4 6.1 8.7 Bedroom Overcrowding 3.6 3.9 4.6 Health 7.1% 21.2% 152.7 per 100,000 u75 population Poor Health (Self-Reported) Limiting Long Term Illness or Disability Under-75 CVD Mortality Rate (DSR) 8th Lowest in Tameside, average 7.3%) (Tameside Average =20.9%) (2nd Highest in Tameside, average = 86.4) Residents of Droylsden East have levels of limiting long term illness or disability and a level of self reported poor health that compares to the Tameside average. Male life expectancy within the ward is approximate to the Tameside average, whereas Female life expectancy is 4th high- est out of allTameside wards. The registered prevalence of hypertension and heart failure within the ward is higher than the Tameside average. Percentage Limiting Long Term Illness or Disability Males Females Tameside Average 30 ♂ ♀ 25 Life Expectancy Life Expectancy 20 76.2 82.5 9th Highest in Tameside 4th Highest in Tameside 15 Tameside Average=76.1 Tameside Average=80.3 10 Under 75 All-Cause Under 75 All-Cause 5 Mortality Rate Mortality Rate % Limiting TermLong Illness or Disability 0 614.3 370.2 (per 100,000 u75 Population) (per 100,000 u75 Population) 4th Highest in Tameside 9th Highest in Tameside Tameside Average=560.6 Tameside Average=358.9 Distribution of Acorn Wellbeing Groups in Droylsden East The profile of Acorn Wellbeing groups in Droylsden East are detailed in the map (next page) and chart (bottom) :- The highest represented Wellbeing Acorn Group in Droylsden East at 43.7% of the population is the ‘Caution’ group’. These are areas where the health and wellbeing of the population is generally good with a below average incidence of illness. However, the population within the ’Caution’ group do exhibit some unhealthy behaviours that may lead to ill-health. Within the ‘caution’ group there are lower levels of smoking, with a lower prevalence of high blood pressure, but a higher prevalence of obesity and high cholesterol. The ‘At Risk’ group represents 26.7% of the Droylsden East population. Areas represented by the ‘At Risk’ group generally do not have a high inci- dence of illness, but multiple unhealthy lifestyle behaviours such as smoking, excess alcohol consumption and poor diets that put the population at risk of future health problems. Unhealthy lifestyle behaviours within the ‘At Risk’ group are compounded by social issues such as unemployment and debt, which can lead to low mental wellbeing. The ‘Health Challenges’ group makes up 18.9% of the Droylsden East population. These are areas with the highest levels of illness and risky behav- iours now and within the past that lead to health challenges. They are typically some of the most deprived neighbourhoods and those with the highest elderly populations. This group has the highest prevalence of smoking and lowest consumption of fruit and vegetables. There may also be issues with isolation and mental wellbeing within the ‘Health Challenges’ group. The ‘Healthy’ group makes up 10.7% of the Droylsden East population. These are areas with very low levels of illness and good lifestyle behaviours. These areas are typically more affluent, often with a high proportion of older residents. Levels of smoking are very low and consumption of fruit and vegetables are high. 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% Map of Droylsden East, illustrating where the four main ‘Acorn’ wellbeing groups are placed Acorn Wellbeing Profile of the Droylsden East Population The profile of Acorn Wellbeing types in Droylsden East are detailed in the table and charts opposite. There are four Acorn Wellbeing types that make up ap- proximately 60% of the Droylsden East population:- The highest represented Wellbeing Acorn Type in Droylsden East at 23.2% of the population is ‘Everything in Moderation’. This type is the most av- erage for family structure and housing. They are more likely to live in a 3 bedroom semi detached property which is owner occupied. There are low lev- els of benefit claimants within this type. They tend to work in intermediate occupations or junior managerial roles, with an income slightly higher than the national average. Health of people within this type is generally good with lower than average smoking rates, although levels of obesity and the propor- tion drinking more than recommended levels are higher than average. The ‘Everyday Excesses’ type accounts for 15.3% of the Droylsden East population.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Boundary Review 2013 England Secondary Consultation
    Boundary Review 2013 England Secondary Consultation Submission of the Labour Party Page 1 of 50 1) General Points a) Submission This submission is made on behalf of the Labour Party and the nine regional Labour parties within England. The submission represents the Labour’s Party’s response to the representations made to the Commission, both orally at the public hearings and in writing during the Initial Consultation Period and published by the Commission on 6 March 2012. The Labour Party made a detailed formal submission of its own which included a number of counter proposals. We have now considered the options further in each region, including those counter proposals submitted by others. We will refer to them in this response. While we are not formally amending our submission we will indicate those points and proposals with which we agree, and those with which we disagree. b) Factors to be considered In assessing the merits of different proposals we will as far as possible be guided by the stipulations of Clause 5 (1) of Schedule 2 to the Parliamentary Voting System and Constituencies Act 2011 which lays down the rules by which the Commission shall conduct the review. Under the terms of the Act1, the Commission may, in choosing between different schemes, take into account i) Special Geographical Circumstances, including the size shape and accessibility of a constituency ii) Local government boundaries iii) The boundaries of existing constituencies iv) Any local ties that would be broken by changes to constituencies 1 Parliamentary Voting System and Constituencies Act 2011, Schedule 2 Clause 5 (1).
    [Show full text]
  • Elections 2008:Layout 1.Qxd
    ELECTIONS REPORT Thursday 1 May 2008 PREPARED BY CST 020 8457 9999 www.thecst.org.uk Copyright © 2008 Community Security Trust Registered charity number 1042391 Executive Summary • Elections were held on 1st May 2008 for the • The other far right parties that stood in the Mayor of London and the London Assembly, elections are small and were mostly ineffective, 152 local authorities in England and all local although the National Front polled almost councils in Wales 35,000 votes across five London Assembly constituencies • The British National Party (BNP) won a seat on the London Assembly for the first time, polling • Respect – The Unity Coalition divided into two over 130,000 votes. The seat will be taken by new parties shortly before the elections: Richard Barnbrook, a BNP councillor in Barking Respect (George Galloway) and Left List & Dagenham. Barnbrook also stood for mayor, winning almost 200,000 first and second • Respect (George Galloway) stood in part of the preference votes London elections, polling well in East London but poorly elsewhere in the capital. They stood • The BNP stood 611 candidates in council nine candidates in council elections outside elections around England and Wales, winning London, winning one seat in Birmingham 13 seats but losing three that they were defending. This net gain of ten seats leaves • Left List, which is essentially the Socialist them holding 55 council seats, not including Workers Party (SWP) component of the old parish, town or community councils. These Respect party, stood in all parts of the
    [Show full text]
  • Notice of Poll
    NOTICE OF POLL Tameside Metropolitan Borough Election of a Borough Councillor for Droylsden East Notice is hereby given that: 1. A poll for the election of a Borough Councillor for Droylsden East will be held on Thursday 8 March 2018, between the hours of 7:00 am and 10:00 pm. 2. The number of Borough Councillors to be elected is one. 3. The names, home addresses and descriptions of the Candidates remaining validly nominated for election and the names of all persons signing the Candidates nomination paper are as follows: Names of Signatories Name of Candidate Home Address Description (if any) Proposers(+), Seconders(++) & Assentors BOYLE 29 Hiltons Farm Close, Labour Party Michael J Smith (+) Teresa A Smith (++) Laura Audenshaw, M34 5JP David J Mills Patricia Larkin Jane S Goodier David H Mitchell James Middleton Geoffrey Howarth Patrick Quinn Stuart Pearson OFFERMAN 23 Shire Croft, Mossley, Liberal Democrats Stephen Lightfoot (+) Claus Barthel (++) Shaun OL5 OAR Valerie Barthel John White Leslie Barlow Carol Oakes Andrew Downs Danielle Moore Lesley Betton Christine Drysdale STEVENSON 10 Saxon Street, The Conservative Party Hazel Stevenson (+) David Stevenson (++) Matt Droylsden, M43 7FR Candidate Joan Smith William R Smith Jennie L Davies Mark A Coyle Michael Sharp Carole Sharp Paul S Davies Steven Lewis TRAIN 34 Parvet Avenue, Green Party Barbara Ganson (+) Mark Jackson (++) Annie Droylsden, Manchester, Anthony J Torkington Gillian A Ingham M43 7SB Richard Ingham Maureen Street Gary Ward Elizabeth Ingham Peter Rothwell James F Brown
    [Show full text]
  • (Public Pack)Agenda Document for Scrutiny Co-Ordinating Board, 13/10
    Date: 5 October 2016 Please note the earlier start time Town Hall, Penrith, Cumbria CA11 7QF Tel: 01768 817817 Email: [email protected] Dear Sir/Madam Special Scrutiny Co-ordinating Board Agenda - 13 October 2016 Notice is hereby given that a special meeting of the Scrutiny Co-ordinating Board will be held at 6.00 pm on Thursday, 13 October 2016 at the Council Chamber, Town Hall, Penrith. 1 Apologies for Absence 2 Declarations of Interest To receive declarations of the existence and nature of any private interests, both disclosable pecuniary and any other registrable interests, in any matter to be considered or being considered. 3 2018 Review of Parliamentary Constituencies (Pages 3 - 48) To consider report G30/16 of the Deputy Chief Executive which is attached and which is to inform Members of the proposals of the Boundary Commission for England in relation to the 2018 Review of Parliamentary Constituencies and how they will affect Cumbria and Eden in particular, and to determine a means to enable the Council’s response to the consultation on them. RECOMMENDATION: That Members comment upon the proposals of the Boundary Commission with a view to recommending a response to Council. 4 Any Other Items which the Chairman decides are urgent 5 Date of Next Scheduled Meeting Yours faithfully M Neal Deputy Chief Executive (Monitoring Officer) Matthew Neal www.eden.gov.uk Deputy Chief Executive Democratic Services Contact: L Rushen Please Note: Access to the internet in the Council Chamber and Committee room is available via the guest wi-fi
    [Show full text]
  • Final Recommendations on the Future Electoral Arrangements for Tameside
    Final recommendations on the future electoral arrangements for Tameside Report to The Electoral Commission August 2003 © Crown Copyright 2003 Applications for reproduction should be made to: Her Majesty’s Stationery Office Copyright Unit. The mapping in this report is reproduced from OS mapping by The Electoral Commission with the permission of the Controller of Her Majesty’s Stationery Office, © Crown Copyright. Unauthorised reproduction infringes Crown Copyright and may lead to prosecution or civil proceedings. Licence Number: GD 03114G. This report is printed on recycled paper. Report no. 349 2 Contents Page What is The Boundary Committee For England? 5 Summary 7 1 Introduction 11 2 Current electoral arrangements 13 3 Draft recommendations 17 4 Responses to consultation 19 5 Analysis and final recommendations 21 6 What happens next? 33 Appendices A Final recommendations for Tameside: Detailed mapping 35 B Guide to interpreting the first draft of the electoral change Order 37 C First draft of electoral change Order for Tameside 39 3 4 What is The Boundary Committee for England? The Boundary Committee for England is a committee of The Electoral Commission, an independent body set up by Parliament under the Political Parties, Elections and Referendums Act 2000. The functions of the Local Government Commission for England (LGCE) were transferred to The Electoral Commission and its Boundary Committee on 1 April 2002 by the Local Government Commission for England (Transfer of Functions) Order 2001 (SI 2001 No. 3692). The Order also transferred to The Electoral Commission the functions of the Secretary of State in relation to taking decisions on recommendations for changes to local authority electoral arrangements and implementing them.
    [Show full text]
  • Denton, Droylsden & Audenshaw: Area Profile
    A profile of needs and services about children, young people and their families In the Ashton area of Tameside December 2007 1 Ashton: Profile of need and services Introduction This is a selective statistical profile of needs and services in the Ashton area – one of four areas chosen as a basis from which future integrated services for children, young people and families will be delivered. The other areas are Stalybridge, Mossley & Dukinfield; Hyde, Hattersley & Longdendale and Denton, Droylsden & Audenshaw. Companion profiles of these other areas are also available. This profile has a focus on data that has relevance to children and families rather than other community members (e.g. older people). The data selected is not exhaustive; rather, key indicators of need are selected to help produce an overall picture of need in the area and offer some comparisons between different localities (mainly wards) within the area. Some commentary is provided as appropriate. It is expected that the profile will aid planning and delivery of services. The profile has two parts: Part 1 focuses on the presentation of basic need data whilst Part 2 focuses on services. 2 Contents Ashton: Profile of need and services ...............................................................2 Introduction ...................................................................................................2 Contents........................................................................................................3 Part 1: Basic need data................................................................................6
    [Show full text]
  • Electoral Review – Council Size Proposal – December 2020 1 Tameside Electoral Review Council Size Proposal – Decemeber
    ELECTORAL REVIEW – COUNCIL SIZE PROPOSAL – DECEMBER 2020 TAMESIDE ELECTORAL REVIEW COUNCIL SIZE PROPOSAL – DECEMEBER 2020 The Local Government Boundary Commission for England (LGBCE) have informed Tameside Council they are to undertake an electoral review. The last such review was in 2003 and agreed the size of the council to be 57 councillors across 19 wards (three councillors per ward). This report is the Tameside Council size proposal (Stage 1) to the LGBCE. In addition, Tameside Council has provided the supporting information requested by the LGBCE. The report is structured as below: 1. Executive summary 2. Tameside the place and its communities 3. Electoral forecasts 4. Governance and decision making 5. Local and sub-regional arrangements 6. Scrutiny and regulatory functions 7. Representational role of councillors in the local community 8. Other 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1.1 Tameside Council proposes a council size of 57 councillors across 19 wards (three councillors per ward). No change from the current council size. 1.2 In coming to the decision to propose a council size of 57 councillors a range of evidence and a number of factors were considered and balanced. They included: population and elector growth; increasing diversity of local communities; governance and decision making; scrutiny and regulatory functions; changing nature of case work in terms of volume, scope and complexity; representation of individuals and communities beyond the formal governance arrangements; major changes such as Greater Manchester devolution and health and social care integration. 1.3 The population and electorate of Tameside has grown considerably since the last electoral review in 2003. 12,800 more population, an increase of 6% (which is above the national average), and 10,600 more electors, an increase of 6.6%.
    [Show full text]
  • Area Profile
    A profile of needs and services about children, young people and their families In the Denton, Droylsden & Audenshaw area of Tameside December 2007 1 Denton, Droylsden & Audenshaw: Profile of need and services Introduction This is a selective statistical profile of needs and services in the Denton, Droylsden & Audenshaw area – one of four areas chosen as a basis from which future integrated services for children, young people and families will be delivered. The other areas are Stalybridge, Mossley & Dukinfield; Hyde, Hattersley & Longdendale and Ashton-under-Lyne. Companion profiles of these other areas are also available. This profile has a focus on data that has relevance to children and families rather than other community members (e.g. older people). The data selected is not exhaustive; rather, key indicators of need are selected to help produce an overall picture of need in the area and offer some comparisons between different localities (mainly wards) within the area. Some commentary is provided as appropriate. It is expected that the profile will aid planning and delivery of services. The profile has two parts: Part 1 focuses on the presentation of basic need data whilst Part 2 focuses on services. 2 ContentsContentsContents Introduction ...................................................................................................2 Contents ...............................................................................................3 Part 1: Basic need data................................................................................6
    [Show full text]
  • Final Recommendations - North West Region
    Final recommendations - North West region Contents 1. Initial/revised proposals overview p1 6. Sub-region 1: Cumbria p11, recommendations p12 2. Number of representations received p3 7. Sub-region 2: Lancashire p13, recommendations p18 3. Campaigns p5 8. Sub-region 3: Merseyside p20, recommendations p21 4. Major issues p6 9. Sub-region 4: Greater Manchester, the Wirral and Cheshire Greater Manchester p21, recommendations p27 the Wirral p30, recommendations p31 Cheshire p31, recommendations p33 5. Final recommendations p8 Appendix A Initial/revised proposals overview 1. The North West region was allocated 68 constituencies under the initial and revised proposals, a reduction of seven from the existing allocation. In formulating the initial and revised proposals the Commission decided to construct constituencies using the following sub-regions: Table 1A - Constituency allocation Sub-region Existing allocation Allocation under initial Allocation under revised proposals proposals Cumbria 6 5 5 Lancashire 16 14 14 Merseyside (less the 11 10 10 Wirral) Greater Manchester, the 42 39 39 Wirral and Cheshire 2. Under the initial proposals 14 of the existing 75 constituencies were unchanged. The revised proposals retained 13 of the existing constituencies unchanged, (a reduction of one). The theoretical entitlement of 25.37 constituencies in Greater Manchester and 10.34 constituencies in Cheshire meant that both counties had to contain constituencies that crossed their respective county boundaries. Under both sets of proposals it was proposed to have two constituencies ​ that crossed county boundaries. We decided not to propose constituencies that crossed the Greater Manchester ​ boundary in the north with Lancashire. The reasons for this are that there was no requirement for Lancashire to have a 1 constituency that crosses the county boundary with Greater Manchester and, even if this crossing had been proposed it still would be necessary to construct a cross-county constituency between Cheshire and Greater Manchester in the south.
    [Show full text]
  • Your Councillors 2019 - 2020
    Your Councillors 2019 - 2020 Audenshaw Droylsden East Godley (Hyde) Newton (Hyde) Stalybridge South Councillor Councillor Councillor Councillor Councillor Councillor Councillor Councillor Councillor Councillor Councillor Councillor Councillor Councillor Councillor Teresa Smith Oliver Ryan Charlotte Martin David Mills Susan Quinn Laura Boyle Joe Kitchen Jim Fitzpatrick Betty Affleck Peter Robinson Philip Fitzpatrick Helen Bowden Doreen Dickinson Liam Billington Clive Patrick 7 Birchwood 134 Stamford Road c/o Tameside One 78A Market Street 161 Droylsden Road 29 Hiltons Farm Close 29 Welbeck Road 1 Douglas Street 11 Nicholson Road 64 Ash Tree Road 2 Lovell Drive 120 Clarendon Road 106 Stocks Lane Flat 28, Millers Wharf 11 Moorgate Cottages Droylsden Audenshaw Market Place Droylsden Droylsden Audenshaw Hyde Hyde Hyde Hyde Hyde Hyde Stalybridge Corn Mill Lane Carrbrook M43 7ST M34 5LA Ashton-under-Lyne M43 6DE M34 5ZT M34 5JP SK14 5PN SK14 1QF SK14 4QH SK14 4EP SK14 4DP SK14 2LJ SK15 2TQ Stalybridge SK15 2EA Stalybridge SK15 3NT OL6 6BH Tel: 371 0765 Tel: 07972 693756 Tel: 342 3021 Tel: 07925 743301 Tel: 292 6493 Tel: 07588 628587 Tel: 366 55781 Tel: 368 8813 Tel: 366 6372 Tel: 366 1755 Tel: 368 5006 Tel: 285 1225 Tel: 303 10201 Tel: 07415 501700 Tel: 01457 837786 Denton North East Droylsden West Hurst (Ashton) St. Michael’s (Ashton) Waterloo (Ashton) Councillor Councillor Councillor Councillor Councillor Councillor Councillor Councillor Councillor Councillor Councillor Councillor Councillor Councillor Councillor Denise Ward Vincent Ricci Allison Gwynne Ged Cooney Barrie Holland Ann Holland Leigh Drennan Dolores Lewis Mike Glover Margaret Sidebottom Bill Fairfoull Yvonne Cartey Pauline Hollinshead Vimal Choksi Lee Huntbach 41 Broomfields 19 Hewitt Avenue 139 St Annes Road 28 Parvet Avenue 47 Shelley Grove 47 Shelley Grove c/o Tameside One 65 Green Lane 80 Hall Road 57 Hadfield Crescent 5 Stalyhill Drive 112 Whiteacre Road 37 Holden Clough Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Local Election Results 2007
    Local Election Results May 2007 Andrew Teale August 12, 2017 2 LOCAL ELECTION RESULTS 2007 Typeset by LATEX Compilation and design © Andrew Teale, 2011. Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.3 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation; with no Invariant Sections, no Front-Cover Texts, and no Back-Cover Texts. A copy of the license is included in the section entitled “GNU Free Documentation License”. This file is available for download from http://www.andrewteale.me.uk/ The LATEX source code is available for download at http://www.andrewteale.me.uk/pdf/2007-source.zip Please advise the author of any corrections which need to be made by email: [email protected] Change Log 12th August 2017: Correction to Market ward, Cambridge (thanks to Colin Rosentiel). 1st August 2015: Gain information added for Walsall. 14th April 2015: The seat won by Gwenda Thomas in the Welsh Assembly was Neath, not Gower. 1st April 2015: Blandford Old Town ward, North Dorset was LD gain from C. 22nd March 2015: Chadsmead ward, Lichfield was 1 LD gain from Lab, not 1 LD gain from C. 15th March 2015: Dorchester East ward, West Dorset was 2 LD holds; Dor- chester North ward, West Dorset was 1 LD gain from Ind. 13th March 2015: Winstanley ward, Blaby was 1 C gain from Lab; Calverton ward, Gedling was 2 Calverton First Independents gain from Lab.. 1st March 2015: Consolidated results for Taunton Deane corrected.
    [Show full text]
  • Local Government Boundary Commission for England Report No.220 LOCAL GOVERNMENT
    Local Government Boundary Commission For England Report No.220 LOCAL GOVERNMENT BOUNDARY COMMISSION FOR ENGLAND REPORT NO. 220. LOCAL GOVERNMENT BOUNDARY COMMISSION FOR ENGLAND CHAIRMAN Sir Edmund Compton GCB,KBE DEPUTY CHAIRMAN Mr J M Rankin QC MEMBERS Lady Bowden Mr J T Brockbank Professor Michael Chisholm Mr R R Thornton CB DL Sir Andrew Wheatley CBE To the Rt Hon Merlyn Rees, MP Secretary of State for the Home Department PROPOSALS FOR REVISED ELECTORAL ARRANGEMENTS FOR THE METROPOLITAN BOROUGH OF TAMESIDE 1. We, the Local Government Boundary Commission for England, having carried out our initial review of the electoral arrange- ments for the metropolitan borough of Tameside in accordance with the requirements of section 63 of, and Schedule 9 to, the Local Government Act 1972, present our proposals for the future electoral arrangements for that borough. 2. In accordance with the procedure laid down in section 60(1) and (2) of the 1972 Act, notice was given on 28 August 1975 that we were to undertake this review. This was incorporated in a consultation letter addressed to the Tameside Borough Council, copies of which were circulated to Greater Manchester County Council, the Members of Parliament for the constituencies concerned arid the headquarters of the main.political parties. Copies were also sent to the editors of local newspapers circulating in the area and of the local government press. Notices inserted in the local press announced the start of the review and invited comments from members of the public and from any interested bodies. 3. Tameside Borough Council were invited to prepare a draft scheme of representation for our consideration.
    [Show full text]