Electoral Performance of Far-Right Parties in the UK

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Electoral Performance of Far-Right Parties in the UK Electoral performance of far-right parties in the UK Standard Note: SN/SG/1982 Last updated: 29 June 2004 Author: Jessica Yonwin Social and General Statistics Section This note provides data on the electoral performance of the UK’s British National Party and National Front in local and parliamentary elections. This note has been updated to include results from the local elections held in England on 10 June 2004. It also comments upon results from various ward by-elections in 2002 and 2003, as well as overall results from the 2002 and 2003 local elections.1 As at 24 June 2004, the BNP had 21 councillors in local government in England. Contents A. Background 2 B. Electoral performance 2 1. Local elections 2 2. European elections 5 3. 1997 General Election 5 4. 2001 General Election 5 5. Table 1: Election performance: General and by elections 7 6. Table 2: 2001 General Election 8 7. Table 3: Ward-by-ward electoral performance of BNP in the 2004 local elections in England and Scotland (see note on page 3). 9 1 See also Library Research Paper 04/49 Local Elections 2004 (23 June 2004), 03/44 Local Elections 2003 (12 May 2003), and 02/33 Local Elections in England: 2 May 2002 (9 May 2002) Standard Notes are compiled for the benefit of Members of Parliament and their personal staff. Authors are available to discuss the contents of these papers with Members and their staff but cannot advise others. A. Background The National Front (NF) was formed in 1967 by the merger of the British National Party (BNP) and the League of Empire Loyalists. Since then, the NF has fielded candidates at all general elections, except 1987. These results are summarised in Table 1. The NF fielded most candidates in the 1979 general election, when it stood in almost half the constituencies in Britain. The NF polled 191,719 votes. All lost their deposits, as have all NF candidates at every general election. In terms of the average votes cast for each candidate, the NF performed better in the previous 1974 elections. During the mid-1970s, the NF enjoyed relative success in parliamentary by-elections. The second part of Table 1 details the National Front's best by-election performances in each Parliament since 1970. More recently, its by-election appearances have been much more sporadic, and its votes quite low. Neither the NF nor the BNP have had candidates in the three parliamentary by-elections held so far in the 2001 Parliament. In 1995, the National Front relinquished its name and re-branded itself as the National Democrats. This caused a split in the NF membership as some activists continued to remain loyal to a ‘residual’ National Front. The NF and BNP fielded candidates in the 1997 and 2001 general elections, while the National Democrats fielded candidates only in 1997. The BNP was formed in 1992 by the former leader of the National Front, John Tyndall. It remains UK’s largest extreme-right political party. The BNP achieved early notoriety when, in September 1993, the party secured the election of Derek Beacon in a by-election for the Millwall ward of the London Borough of Tower Hamlets. Beacon lost his seat in the 1994 borough-wide elections. In 1997, the party fielded over 50 candidates in the general election and, to the disquiet of many, qualified for a televised party election broadcast. B. Electoral performance 1. Local elections The extreme-right has tended to concentrate its local campaigning activities in urban districts with relatively high minority ethnic populations. The BNP has often exploited the delicate balance of local community relations in order to consolidate its electoral support and activist base. Over time, the success of extreme-right candidates has tended to be confined to local ward by-elections where turnout has been low. In the 2000 local elections, the BNP obtained 23% of the vote in Tipton Green while the NF polled 10% in Great Bridge, both wards in the metropolitan borough of Sandwell. In Bexley in July 2000, the BNP secured 26% in the North End ward by-election. In the GLA elections in 2000, the BNP polled 7.1% in City and East for the London-wide top-up seats, although elsewhere its vote did not exceed 4.6% (Havering and Redbridge). 2 Overall, the BNP polled 2.9% of the votes, below the 5% threshold necessary to obtain GLA representation through the top-up list system. In the 2004 GLA elections the BNP polled 90,365 votes, 4.8% of the vote, an increase of 1.9 percentage points on 2000. The ballot for the Mayor of London was held simultaneously with the 2000 and 2004 GLA elections. The BNP’s candidate in 2000, Michael Newland, polled 2% of first-preference votes and 3.2% of second-round votes. Newland was placed 7th out of 11 candidates. Newland fared best in City and East (4.5% of first-preference votes) and worst in West Central (0.9%). In 2004 the BNP candidate, Julian Leppert, polled 3.1% of first preference votes and 4.4% of second-choice votes across London. The areas with highest support were Havering and Redbridge (6%), City and East (6%) and Bexley and Bromley (4%). Julian Leppert was placed joint 6th (along with the Green Party), out of 10 candidates. Following the race riots in summer 2001 in the Lancashire towns of Burnley and Oldham, the BNP secured relatively high shares of the vote in by-elections held in several key wards during November 2001 – Lowerhouse (23%), Trinity (19%) and Rose Hill (19%). Note: Calculation of Vote Shares in Multi-Member Wards The method by which party shares of the vote are calculated for multi-member wards (such as local district or borough elections where, for example, two or three councillors are to be elected), tends to inflate the vote share for those parties fielding just one candidate. By convention, in multi-member ward elections the vote of each party’s best-placed candidate is used to calculate total vote and, hence, overall party shares of the vote. For instance, in a ward where three Labour candidates each received 1,000 votes, three Conservative candidates each received 500 votes and one BNP candidate received 700 votes, the three Labour candidates would be duly elected and the corresponding shares of the vote would be calculated thus: Labour % share = (1,000/(1,000+500+700))*100 OR (1,000/2,200)*100 = 45% Conservative % share = (500/2,200)*100 = 23% BNP % share = (700/2,200)*100= 32% In reality, however, the BNP candidate secured the votes of only 700 electors out of a total of 5,200 different votes cast, or 13%. In using the conventional methodology, the BNP’s share of the vote could be seen as being inflated by 19 percentage points. In this Standard Note the conventional approach has been retained. But it should be noted that where the BNP fielded only one candidate (which is the case in most instances), the reported share of the vote could be seen as subject to inflation. In the local elections in England on 2 May 2002, sixty-seven BNP candidates polled 30,998 votes in 26 local authority districts. The average BNP share of the vote was 16%. The average turnout in these wards was 35%, compared with an estimated 34% nationally. Three BNP candidates were returned in Burnley. 3 Interestingly, these were not the wards where the BNP secured its highest shares of the vote. Elsewhere in Burnley, the BNP polled 31.2% (Brunshaw ward) and 27.9% (Queensgate). In nearby Oldham, the BNP polled its highest share of the vote (35%) in St. James ward, and 30% in the ward of Chadderton South. In the Sunderland ward of Townend Farm, the BNP secured 28%. The BNP also fielded a candidate in the direct mayoral election in the London Borough of Newham where their candidate, Michael Davidson, polled 2,881 votes (7.2%) on a 27.6% turnout. Robin Evans, the BNP candidate for the Mill Hill ward in the Borough of Blackburn and Darwen, took the seat from the Liberal Democrats at a by-election held on 21 November 2002. Following a recount, the BNP polled 578 votes (33%), Labour 562 votes (32%), Liberal Democrats 505 votes (29%) and Conservatives 154 votes (9%). Turnout was 39%. In the June 2004 elections, there were no BNP candidates elected in Blackburn and Darwen. Robin Evans stood as an Independent candidate and was not re-elected. On 23 January 2003, Adrian Marsden won Mixenden ward of Calderdale council for the BNP, taking the seat from Labour. The BNP polled 679 votes (29.2%), Liberal Democrats 651 votes (28.0%), Labour 641 votes (27.6%), Conservatives 214 votes (9.2%), while the Independent candidate polled 142 votes (6.1%). Turnout was 37.1%. In the June 2004 local elections Adrian Marsden, was elected for the Town ward of Calderdale council, and Geoffrey Wallace and Richard Mulhall won seats in the Illingworth and Mixenden ward. Overall, in the 2003 local elections, the BNP fielded a total of 217 candidates in 71 local authorities in England and Scotland. The BNP won a total of 13 council seats, polling over 100,000 votes, averaging 17% of the vote in those wards where they fielded candidates. The BNP scored a key by-election victory in the Heckmondwicke ward of Kirklees Council on 14 August 2003. The BNP candidate, David Exley, polled 1,607 votes (44%), and held the seat, polling 2,076 votes in 2004.
Recommended publications
  • Prison Education in England and Wales. (2Nd Revised Edition)
    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 388 842 CE 070 238 AUTHOR Ripley, Paul TITLE Prison Education in England and Wales. (2nd Revised Edition). Mendip Papers MP 022. INSTITUTION Staff Coll., Bristol (England). PUB DATE 93 NOTE 30p. AVAILABLE FROMStaff College, Coombe Lodge, Blagdon, Bristol BS18 6RG, England, United Kingdom (2.50 British pounds). PUB TYPE Information Analyses (070) EDRS PRICE MF01/PCO2 Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS Adult Basic Education; *Correctional Education; *Correctional Institutions; Correctional Rehabilitation; Criminals; *Educational History; Foreign Countries; Postsecondary Education; Prisoners; Prison Libraries; Rehabilitation Programs; Secondary Education; Vocational Rehabilitation IDENTIFIERS *England; *Wales ABSTRACT In response to prison disturbances in England and Wales in the late 1980s, the education program for prisoners was improved and more prisoners were given access to educational services. Although education is a relatively new phenomenon in the English and Welsh penal system, by the 20th century, education had become an integral part of prison life. It served partly as a control mechanism and partly for more altruistic needs. Until 1993 the management and delivery of education and training in prisons was carried out by local education authority staff. Since that time, the education responsibility has been contracted out to organizations such as the Staff College, other universities, and private training organizations. Various policy implications were resolved in order to allow these organizations to provide prison education. Today, prison education programs are probably the most comprehensive of any found in the country. They may range from literacy education to postgraduate study, with students ranging in age from 15 to over 65. The curriculum focuses on social and life skills.
    [Show full text]
  • Rachel Reeves MP
    Rachel Reeves MP Monthly Report September 2014 Labour Member of Parliament for Leeds West, Shadow Secretary of State for Work & Pensions SUPPORT OUR LEEDS WEST LIBRARIES Constituency, following a number of 1000 signatures. closures in the past few years, and Leeds West now has the lowest Rachel has also hosted a public number of libraries in Leeds. For meetings at Bramley and Armley comparison, Elmet and Rothwell Library and a ‘read in’ event at Constituency has 7 Libraries. Bramley Library. A further read-in will be taking place at Armley Library on As part of the campaign, Rachel has Saturday 20th September from visited schools across Leeds West and 10am. There will be storytellers and Full crowd at Bramley Library chatted with pupils and teachers fun activities for kids. Public Meeting about their love of libraries. Armley writers, Alan Bennett and Barbara Rachel is spearheading a campaign Taylor-Bradford have sent messages against the proposed reduction of of support to the campaign, with Alan opening hours at Armley and Bennett writing, “...Every child in Bramley Libraries. Leeds today deserves these facilities and the support that I had Armley and Bramley are the only fifty years ago”. A petition against the libraries left in the Leeds West proposed cuts has received almost BRAMLEY VETERAN SECURES MEDAL Bramley war veteran Peter Paylor, Defence and was able to secure Mr age 91, has finally received his Paylor his medal after a 66 year wait. campaign medal for service in Palestine between 1945—1948, Rachel, who first met Mr Paylor at following intervention from Rachel the Bramley War Memorial and Bramley & Stanningley Councillor dedication ceremony, said, “After Kevin Ritchie.
    [Show full text]
  • Electoral Review of Salford City Council
    Electoral review of Salford City Council Response to the Local Government Boundary Commission for England’s consultation on Warding Patterns August 2018 1 1 Executive Summary 1.1 Salford in 2018 has changed dramatically since the city’s previous electoral review of 2002. Salford has seen a turnaround in its fortunes over recent years, reversing decades of population decline and securing high levels of investment. The city is now delivering high levels of growth, in both new housing and new jobs, and is helping to drive forward both Salford’s and the Greater Manchester economies. 1.2 The election of the Greater Manchester Mayor and increased devolution of responsibilities to Greater Manchester, and the Greater Manchester Combined Authority, is fundamentally changing the way Salford City Council works in areas of economic development, transport, work and skills, planning, policing and more recently health and social care. 1.3 Salford’s directly elected City Mayor has galvanised the city around eight core priorities – the Great Eight. Delivering against these core priorities will require the sustained commitment and partnership between councillors, partners in the private, public, community and voluntary and social enterprise sectors, and the city’s residents. This is even more the case in the light of ongoing national policy changes, the impending departure of the UK from the EU, and continued austerity in funding for vital local services. The city’s councillors will have an absolutely central role in delivering against these core priorities, working with all our partners and residents to harness the energies and talents of all of the city.
    [Show full text]
  • Leeds City Council Standards Committee Annual Report 2009
    Leeds City Council Standards Committee Annual Report 2009 – 2010 Introduction The Local Government Act 2000 requires councils to set up a standards committee. Standards committees have a proactive role in creating an ethical framework which governs the relationship between high standards of conduct and transparency and openness in decision making. As a result of the Local Government and Public Involvement in Health Act 2007 and the Standards Committee (England) Regulations 2008, the role of the Standards Committee also includes the local assessment of complaints made under the Member Code of Conduct. This is the Committee’s fifth Annual Report and it presents a summary of its work during the 2009-10 municipal year. The Committee’s Annual Return to Standards for England is appended to the report. This report supports the corporate governance arrangements of the Council by promoting good conduct and cascading information. Our Ambition “To help develop and maintain a climate of mutual trust and respect in which Members, officers and partners work effectively together to deliver the Council’s strategic and operational priorities and where the public can be assured that this is done in an honest, objective and accountable way.” 2 Foreword from the Chair Leeds City Council was announced as winner of the Standards and Ethics category at the Local Government Chronicle Awards 2010. The judging panel was impressed by the Leeds approach to ethical governance within the authority, and its commitment to promoting and maintaining high standards of Member conduct. Features of our work were also highlighted as a case study of notable practice in Standards for England’s most recent Annual Review.
    [Show full text]
  • South Leeds Neighbourhood Policing Team
    South Leeds Neighbourhood Policing Team newsNovember 2017 making a difference locally Police cadets & officers team up for a clean up! Visit us online at www.westyorkshire.police.uk Police Cadets make a difference! These are the Leeds South Volunteer Isle, and was organised by Councillor well together. The cadet leaders were Police Cadets, undertaking part of Kim Groves. very impressed with their work too! their two-year Duke of Edinburgh Award. This involved painting the barrier around Cadet Leaders present - Staff Officer the land, picking up the discarded litter Martin Stubbs, Staff Officer Ben Straker, As part of their DofE course they go out and planting bulbs around the trees and Staff officer Fiona Campbell, Staff into the community each month and the border. Officer George Clay, Staff Officer complete some voluntary work. The Declan Heaton. recent engagement day was on a part of All of the kids, who are aged between open land just off Old Run Road, Belle 13 - 15 years of age, all worked really Visit us online at www.westyorkshire.police.uk Holbeck Community Clean up Basis Yorkshire, along with West Yorkshire Police and Leeds City Council, are leading a community clean up in Holbeck on Thursday 7th December from 10am - 2pm. If you would like to help please contact us by emailing [email protected] or just turn up at St Matthew’s Community Centre on the day, where we will be based. All volunteers are greatly appreciated for as little or as much time as you can spare. Hot drinks and bacon sandwiches will also be available so feel free to pop in for a chat.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Boulsworth
    Boulsworth Profile Contents 1. Population 1.1. 2009 Estimates 1.2. Marital Status 1.3. Ethnicity 1.4. Social Grade 2. Labour Market 2.1. Economic Activity 2.2. Economic Inactivity 2.3. Employment Occupations 2.4. Key Out-of-Work Benefits 2.4.1. Jobseeker’s Allowance Claimants 2.4.2. JSA Claimants by Age and Duration 2.4.3. Benefit Claimants 2.4.4. Income Support 3. Health 3.1. Limiting Long-Term Illness 3.2. Disability Living Allowance Claimants 3.3. Incapacity Benefit / Severe Disablement Allowance 3.4. Under 18 Conception Rates 4. Crime 5. Housing 5.1. Household Types 5.2. Tenure 5.3. People per Household 5.4. Number of Rooms per Household 5.5. Persons per Room 5.6. Housing Stock 6. Education 6.1. Key Stage 2 Results 6.2. Adult Qualifications 1 1. Population 1.1. 2009 Estimates Boulsworth Pendle England Total % % % All All 5261 0-15 893 17.0% 20.5% 18.7% 16-24 500 9.5% 12.0% 12.0% 25-49 1759 33.4% 32.0% 35.0% 50-64 / 50-59 1035 19.7% 16.4% 14.9% 65 / 60 and over 1074 20.4% 19.1% 19.3% Males All 2586 0-15 444 17.2% 21.1% 19.5% 16-24 277 10.7% 12.6% 12.5% 25-49 853 33.0% 32.2% 35.5% 50-64 609 23.5% 20.0% 18.0% 65 and over 403 15.6% 14.1% 14.5% Females All 2675 0-15 449 16.8% 19.8% 18.0% 16-24 223 8.3% 11.5% 11.6% 25-49 906 33.9% 31.9% 34.4% 50-59 426 15.9% 12.9% 12.0% 60 and over 671 25.1% 23.9% 24.0% (Source: Office for National Statistics) Main Points: - The breakdown of age groups for the Boulsworth population shows that there is a greater proportion of older residents in the ward compared to the borough and national averages.
    [Show full text]
  • Nomination Paper Pack for By-Election of Hyde Newton on 5Th
    Nomination Paper Office Use Only No of Nomination Paper Time delivered Date delivered Initials Tameside Metropolitan Borough in order of delivery ELECTION OF A BOROUGH COUNCILLOR for Hyde Newton Date of Election: Thursday 5 February 2009 We the undersigned, being local government electors for the said Ward , do hereby nominate the under-mentioned person as a candidate at the said election. PLEASE COMPLETE IN CAPITALS (except where a signature is required) Candidate’s Other forename(s) Commonly used Commonly used Home Address surname forenames Description (if any) use no more than 6 words surname in full (if any) (if any) in full Title Email Address Telephone Electoral Number Signature Print Name as Signed Polling District Number Letters Proposer Seconder We the undersigned, being local government electors for the said Ward, do hereby assent to the foregoing nomination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Notes 1. The attention of candidates and electors is drawn to the rules for filling up nomination papers and provisions relating to nomination papers contained the election rules in Schedule 2 to the Local Election (Principle Areas) Rules 2006. 2. Where a candidate is commonly known by some title they may be described by their title as if it were their surname. 3. Where a candidate commonly uses a name which is different from any other name they have, the commonly used name may also appear on the nomination paper, but if it does so, the commonly used name (instead of any other name) will appear on the ballot paper. 4. But the ballot paper will show the other name if the Returning Officer thinks that the use of the commonly used name may (a) be likely to mislead or confuse electors, or (b) that the commonly used name is obscene or offensive.
    [Show full text]
  • 2005 No. 170 LOCAL GOVERNMENT, ENGLAND The
    STATUTORY INSTRUMENTS 2005 No. 170 LOCAL GOVERNMENT, ENGLAND The County of Lancashire (Electoral Changes) Order 2005 Made - - - - 1st February 2005 Coming into force in accordance with article 1(2) Whereas the Boundary Committee for England(a), acting pursuant to section 15(4) of the Local Government Act 1992(b), has submitted to the Electoral Commission(c) recommendations dated October 2004 on its review of the county of Lancashire: And whereas the Electoral Commission have decided to give effect, with modifications, to those recommendations: And whereas a period of not less than six weeks has expired since the receipt of those recommendations: Now, therefore, the Electoral Commission, in exercise of the powers conferred on them by sections 17(d) and 26(e) of the Local Government Act 1992, and of all other powers enabling them in that behalf, hereby make the following Order: Citation and commencement 1.—(1) This Order may be cited as the County of Lancashire (Electoral Changes) Order 2005. (2) This Order shall come into force – (a) for the purpose of proceedings preliminary or relating to any election to be held on the ordinary day of election of councillors in 2005, on the day after that on which it is made; (b) for all other purposes, on the ordinary day of election of councillors in 2005. Interpretation 2. In this Order – (a) The Boundary Committee for England is a committee of the Electoral Commission, established by the Electoral Commission in accordance with section 14 of the Political Parties, Elections and Referendums Act 2000 (c.41). The Local Government Commission for England (Transfer of Functions) Order 2001 (S.I.
    [Show full text]
  • Properties for Customers of the Leeds Homes Register
    Welcome to our weekly list of available properties for customers of the Leeds Homes Register. Bidding finishes Monday at 11.59pm. For further information on the properties listed below, how to bid and how they are let please check our website www.leedshomes.org.uk or telephone 0113 222 4413. Please have your application number and CBL references to hand. Alternatively, you can call into your local One Stop Centre or Community Hub for assistance. Date of Registration (DOR) : Homes advertised as date of registration (DOR) will be let to the bidder with the earliest date of registration and a local c onnection to the Ward area. Successful bidders will need to provide proof of local connection within 3 days of it being requested. Maps of Ward areas can be found at www.leeds.gov.uk/wardmaps Aug 4 2021 to Aug 9 2021 Ref Landlord Address Area Beds Type Sheltered Adapted Rent Description DOR Beech View , Aberford , Leeds, LS25 Single/couple 10984 Leeds City Council 3BW Harewood 1 Bungalow No No 88.49 No LANDSEER ROAD, BRAMLEY, LEEDS, Single person or couple 10987 Leeds City Council LS13 2QP Bramley and Stanningley 1 Flat No No 66.26 No COTTINGLEY TOWERS, Cottingley Single person or couple 10989 Leeds City Council Drive , Beeston , Leeds , LS11 0JH Beeston and Holbeck 1 Flat No No 69.44 No KINGSWAY, DRIGHLINGTON, Single person or couple 10993 Leeds City Council BRADFORD, LEEDS, BD11 1ET Morley North 1 Flat No No 66.30 No NEWHALL GARDENS, MIDDLETON, Single/couple 11000 Leeds City Council LEEDS, LS10 3TF Middleton Park 1 Flat No No 63.52 No NORTH
    [Show full text]
  • Agenda Morley Town Deal Board 12 April 2021
    Morley Town Deal Board Meeting Agenda pack Monday 12 April 2021 Morley Town Deal Board Agenda Thursday 12 April 2021 13:00- 14:30 Zoom Meeting ITEM 1. Welcome and apologies - 10.00 – 10.05 2. Declarations of interest – 10.05 – 10.10 3. Agree previous minutes – 10.10 – 10.20 4. Project updates – key challenges and programme – 10.20 – 11.20 5. Programme support – 11.20– 11.30 6. Communications & public affairs 11.30 – 11.50 7. AOB – 11.50 – 12.00 Attendees Gerald Jennings – Director, G.R. Jennings Properties Ltd Mark Goldstone – Head of Policy and Business Representation, West and North Yorkshire Chamber of Commerce Councillor Robert Finnigan – Morley Town Council Andrea Jenkyns – Member of Parliament, Morley and Outwood Steven Foster – Director, Land Securities Cameron Stephenson – Constituency Office Manager, Office of Andrea Jenkyns MP Rachael Kennedy – Morley Town Centre Manager Reverend Anthony Lee – Leader, Morley Community Church Counillor Neil Dawson, Morley South ward member Councillor Wyn Kidger, Morley South ward member Councillor Andrew Hutchison, Morley North ward member Martin Farrington – Director of City Development, Leeds City Council Dawn Ginns – Resident, Morley Apologies Morley Town Deal Board Meeting Agenda pack Monday 12 April 2021 Councillor Helen Hayden – Executive Member, Climate Change, Transport and Sustainable Development, Leeds City Council Rebecca Greenwood – Policy Officer, West Yorkshire Combined Authority Lorraine Coates, Area Lead Leeds City Region, Cities and Local Growth Unit Invited attendees Jessica Ashton – Senior Regeneration Officer, Leeds City Council Adam Brannen – Head of Regeneration, Leeds City Council Samuel Lewis – Principal Regeneration Officer, Leeds City Council Chris Brown - Regeneration Support Officer, Leeds City Council 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Parliamentary Debates (Hansard)
    Tuesday Volume 512 29 June 2010 No. 23 HOUSE OF COMMONS OFFICIAL REPORT PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES (HANSARD) Tuesday 29 June 2010 £5·00 © Parliamentary Copyright House of Commons 2010 This publication may be reproduced under the terms of the Parliamentary Click-Use Licence, available online through the Office of Public Sector Information website at www.opsi.gov.uk/click-use/ Enquiries to the Office of Public Sector Information, Kew, Richmond, Surrey TW9 4DU; e-mail: [email protected] 697 29 JUNE 2010 698 almost identical to the chances in the rest of Europe. House of Commons Does the Secretary of State therefore believe that a one-year survival indicator is a good idea both for Tuesday 29 June 2010 encouraging early diagnosis and for matching the survival rates of the best in Europe? The House met at half-past Two o’clock Mr Lansley: My hon. Friend makes an extremely good point. When we set out proposals for an outcomes PRAYERS framework, I hope that he and others will respond, because that is one of the ways in which we can best identify how late detection of cancer is leading to very [MR SPEAKER in the Chair] poor levels of survival to one year. I hope that we can think about that as one of the quality indicators that we shall establish. Oral Answers to Questions Diana R. Johnson (Kingston upon Hull North) (Lab): I welcome the Secretary of State to his new position and wish him well in his role. I understand that he is keeping HEALTH the two-week target for seeing a cancer specialist, but abandoning the work that the Labour Government did on the one-week target for access to diagnostic testing.
    [Show full text]
  • Kirklees Metropolitan Council
    KIRKLEES COUNCIL (TRAFFIC REGULATION) (NO. 6) ORDER 2014 LOWERHOUSES LANE, LOWERHOUSES, NEWSOME, HUDDERSFIELD The Council of the Borough of Kirklees ("the Council") in exercise of their powers under Sections 1, 2, 4, 32, 35, 45, 46, 47, 49 and 53 of the Road Traffic Regulation Act 1984 ("the Act"), Part 6 of the Traffic Management Act 2004, the Road Traffic (Permitted Parking Area and Special Parking Area) (Metropolitan Borough of Kirklees) Order 2006 and of all other enabling powers and after consultation with the Chief Officer of Police in accordance with Part III of Schedule 9 to the Act hereby makes the following Order which relates to a road in the Newsome ward in the Kirklees Metropolitan District:- PART I 1. Interpretation 1.1. Except where the context otherwise requires any reference in this Order to a numbered Article is a reference to the Article bearing that number in this Order and any reference in this Order to a numbered Schedule is a reference to the Schedule bearing that number in this Order. 1.2. In this Order except where the context otherwise requires the following expressions have the meanings hereby respectively assigned to them:- “civil enforcement officer” has the meaning given by S.76 of the 2004 Act. “enforcement authority” means the Council. “penalty charge” has the meaning given by S.92 of the 2004 Act. “subordinate legislation” has the same meaning as in Section 21 of the Interpretation Act 1978. "telecommunications apparatus" has the same meaning as in the Telecommunications Act 1984. “the 2004 Act” means the Traffic Management Act 2004.
    [Show full text]