DOCSLIB.ORG

American Orchid Society Handbook on Judging

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
American Orchid Society Handbook on Judging AMERICAN ORCHID SOCIETY HANDBOOK ON JUDGING (Effective March 21, 2021) PREFACE The Handbook on Judging, hereinafter referred to as the Handbook, is the official policy statement of the AOS regarding the operation of its judging system. It is published on the AOS website and in OrchidPro. Changes to the Handbook, as adopted from time to time by the JC with the approval of the Board of Trustees, are published on the AOS website and in OrchidPro. These changes become effective once published. Observance of the rules stated herein is mandatory upon AOS judges as well as show officials and individual exhibitors. Failure to observe the rules may result in disqualification of judges from service, of shows from the privilege of offering AOS judging, or of exhibitors from eligibility to receive AOS awards. All judges are required to maintain continuous AOS membership, thereby maintaining access to OrchidPro and the current edition of the Handbook as published. Table of Contents I. AMERICAN ORCHID SOCIETY JUDGING SYSTEM .................................................................................... 4 1.1 Mission .......................................................................................................................................... 4 1.2 History ........................................................................................................................................... 4 1.3 Judging Centers (locations and dates established): ......................................................................... 5 1.4 Award Records ............................................................................................................................... 6 II. JUDGING COMMITTEE ......................................................................................................................... 7 2.1 Organization .................................................................................................................................. 7 2.2 Meetings ....................................................................................................................................... 7 2.3 Duties and Responsibilities ............................................................................................................ 7 2.4 Duties and Responsibilities of JC Chair ........................................................................................... 8 2.5 Judging Policy Task Force ............................................................................................................... 8 2.6 Judging Ethics Task Force ............................................................................................................... 8 2 7 Judging Handbook Task Force ........................................................................................................ 8 III. JUDGING CENTER COMMITTEES ......................................................................................................... 9 3.1 Organization .................................................................................................................................. 9 3.2 Duties of Officers ........................................................................................................................... 9 3.3 Meetings ..................................................................................................................................... 11 3.4 Qualifications and Terms of Office................................................................................................ 13 3.5 Establishment of New Judging Centers ......................................................................................... 13 3.6 Criteria for Relocation of a Judging Center ................................................................................... 15 3.7 Criteria for the Probation or Dissolution of a Judging Center: ....................................................... 15 3.8 Center Representation at the JC ................................................................................................... 16 3.9 Judging Centers and Affiliated Societies ....................................................................................... 16 IV. JUDGES............................................................................................................................................. 17 4.1 Judges .......................................................................................................................................... 17 4.2 Appointment and Accreditation ................................................................................................... 17 4.3 Continuing Status ......................................................................................................................... 22 4.4 Judging Center Assignment .......................................................................................................... 22 4.5 Knowledge and Abilities ............................................................................................................... 22 4.6 Responsibilities ............................................................................................................................ 23 4.7 Judges’ Education ........................................................................................................................ 24 4.8 Conduct of Judges ........................................................................................................................ 25 4.9 Separation from Service ............................................................................................................... 26 4.10 Returning to Service ................................................................................................................... 27 Top of the Document Page 2 of 72 4.11 Suspension, Termination and/or Lesser Sanctions ...................................................................... 28 V. JUDGING PROCESS ............................................................................................................................ 32 5.1 Purpose of Judging ....................................................................................................................... 32 5.2 Judging Materials ......................................................................................................................... 32 5.3 Submission of Plants for Judging................................................................................................... 32 5.4 Care and Disposition of Plants ...................................................................................................... 33 5.5 Judging Practice ........................................................................................................................... 33 5.6 Judging at Orchid Shows .............................................................................................................. 39 5.7 Outreach Judging ......................................................................................................................... 41 VI. AMERICAN ORCHID SOCIETY AWARDS .............................................................................................. 42 6.1 Purpose and Granting of Awards .................................................................................................. 42 6.2 Awards for Individual Plants (and Special Groups of Plants).......................................................... 42 6.3 Awards for Display of Plants, Flowers, and Educational Material .................................................. 48 VII. JUDGING CRITERIA AND POINT SCALES ............................................................................................ 51 7.1 Quality ......................................................................................................................................... 51 7.2 Point Scales for AOS Awards - Flower Quality ............................................................................... 55 7.3 Point Scale for AOS Awards - Other .............................................................................................. 55 7.4 Principles of Design ...................................................................................................................... 57 7.5 Measurement and Description ..................................................................................................... 58 VIII. AN ORCHID JUDGE’S GLOSSARY ...................................................................................................... 64 IX. INFORMATIONAL NOTES................................................................................................................... 69 Top of the Document Page 3 of 72 I. AMERICAN ORCHID SOCIETY JUDGING SYSTEM (Revisions Approved April 23, 2020) 1.1 Mission Among the goals of the American Orchid Society (AOS) are the promotion of knowledge and appreciation of orchids by the public, as well as the education of the public relative to orchids. The AOS Judging System, as implemented by this Handbook, is designed to support these goals by providing a process to its members, affiliated societies, and orchid growers everywhere (both domestic and international) by which their orchids can be evaluated and judged for AOS awards. AOS judges provide this service through regularly scheduled judging sessions at the various AOS judging centers and additional sites, at AOS-sanctioned shows, and at other AOS-sanctioned events, such
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Generic and Subtribal Relationships in Neotropical Cymbidieae (Orchidaceae) Based on Matk/Ycf1 Plastid Data
    LANKESTERIANA 13(3): 375—392. 2014. I N V I T E D P A P E R* GENERIC AND SUBTRIBAL RELATIONSHIPS IN NEOTROPICAL CYMBIDIEAE (ORCHIDACEAE) BASED ON MATK/YCF1 PLASTID DATA W. MARK WHITTEN1,2, KURT M. NEUBIG1 & N. H. WILLIAMS1 1Florida Museum of Natural History, University of Florida Gainesville, FL 32611-7800 USA 2Corresponding author: [email protected] ABSTRACT. Relationships among all subtribes of Neotropical Cymbidieae (Orchidaceae) were estimated using combined matK/ycf1 plastid sequence data for 289 taxa. The matrix was analyzed using RAxML. Bootstrap (BS) analyses yield 100% BS support for all subtribes except Stanhopeinae (87%). Generic relationships within subtribes are highly resolved and are generally congruent with those presented in previous studies and as summarized in Genera Orchidacearum. Relationships among subtribes are largely unresolved. The Szlachetko generic classification of Maxillariinae is not supported. A new combination is made for Maxillaria cacaoensis J.T.Atwood in Camaridium. KEY WORDS: Orchidaceae, Cymbidieae, Maxillariinae, matK, ycf1, phylogenetics, Camaridium, Maxillaria cacaoensis, Vargasiella Cymbidieae include many of the showiest align nrITS sequences across the entire tribe was Neotropical epiphytic orchids and an unparalleled unrealistic due to high levels of sequence divergence, diversity in floral rewards and pollination systems. and instead to concentrate our efforts on assembling Many researchers have posed questions such as a larger plastid data set based on two regions (matK “How many times and when has male euglossine and ycf1) that are among the most variable plastid bee pollination evolved?”(Ramírez et al. 2011), or exon regions and can be aligned with minimal “How many times have oil-reward flowers evolved?” ambiguity across broad taxonomic spans.
    [Show full text]
  • Download As .PDF Document
    London Orchid Society Useful Orchid Research Sources June 29, 2017 Database Information Programs OrchidWiz AOS Orchids Plus https://www.orchidwiz.com http://secure.aos.org/produ / cts/142-orchids-plus-online- and-software.aspx Websites AOS - Basics of Orchid Names AOS - Orchid Awards & Judging http://www.aos.org/orchids http://www.aos.org/orchid- /additional- awards-judging.aspx resources/basics-of-orchid- names.aspx AOS - Orchidist’s Glossary Bibliorchidea - Swiss Orchid Foundation http://www.aos.org/orchids https://orchid.unibas.ch/ind /orchidists-glossary.aspx ex.php?option=com_conten t&view=article&id=4&Itemi d=115&lang=en Biodiversity Heritage Library Botanicus Digital Library http://www.biodiversitylibr http://www.botanicus.org/ ary.org/search?SearchTerm browse/titles/O =orchid&SearchCat=S&retur n=ADV#/subjects The British Orchid Council Canadian Orchid Congress - Culture Sheets http://www.british-orchid- http://canadianorchidcongr council.info/BOC2014/index ess.ca/Engnames.pdf .html Canadian Orchid Congress - English Common Orchid Digital Media Repository Names to Latin Names http://canadianorchidcongr http://libx.bsu.edu/cdm/lan ess.ca/Engnames.pdf dingpage/collection/BrckrO rchd Encyclopaedia Angraecorum Encyclopedia of Life http://www.angraecum.org http://www.eol.org/pages/ / 8156/overview Page 1 London Orchid Society Useful Orchid Research Sources June 29, 2017 Herbario AMO ING - Index Nominum Genericorum http://www.herbarioamo.o http://botany.si.edu/ing/ rg/ Integrated Taxonomic Information System The International Plant Names Index (IPNI) https://www.itis.gov/ http://www.ipni.org/ipni/ plantnamesearchpage.do Internet Orchid Species Photo Encyclopedia London Orchid Society documents http://www.orchidspecies.c http://londonorchidsociet om/ y.com/MiscFile.asp London Orchid Society Picture Reference Query McAllen International Orchid Society Journal http://londonorchidsociety.
    [Show full text]
  • ORQUÍDEAS DE CUNDINAMARCA: CONSERVACIÓN Y APROVECHAMIENTO SOSTENIBLE Conservación Orquídeas De
    ISBN: 978-958-5418-30-1 ISBN: ORQUÍDEAS DE CUNDINAMARCA CONSERVACIÓN Y APROVECHAMIENTO SOSTENIBLE : CONSERVACIÓN ORQUÍDEAS DE CUNDINAMARCA Y APROVECHAMIENTO SOSTENIBLE ORQUÍDEAS DE CUNDINAMARCA CONSERVACIÓN Y APROVECHAMIENTO SOSTENIBLE Citación de obra completa sugerida: Castellanos-Castro, C. y Torres-Morales, G. 2018. Orquídeas de Cundinamarca: conservación y aprovechamiento sostenible. Insti- tuto de Investigación de Recursos Biológicos Alexander von Humboldt, Pontificia Universidad Javeriana, Jardín Botánico de Bogotá ORQUÍDEAS DE “José Celestino Mutis”, Corporación Colombiana de Investigación Agropecuaria Corpoica, Gobernación de Cundinamarca. Bogotá CUNDINAMARCA D.C., Colombia. 328 p. Citación de capítulo sugerida: conservaciÓN Y Ibarra, J., Rincón-Useche, C., Rincón, A., Cely, N. y Rojas, C. 2018. Aprovechamiento comercial de orquídeas: Contexto socioeconó- APROVECHAMIENTO mico en San Antonio del Tequendama y Fusagasugá. En: Castellanos-Castro, C. y Torres-Morales, G. Orquídeas de Cundinamarca: SOSTENIBLE conservación y aprovechamiento sostenible (92 - 125 pp.) Instituto de Investigación de Recursos Biológicos Alexander von Hum- boldt, Pontificia Universidad Javeriana, Jardín Botánico de Bogotá “José Celestino Mutis”, Corporación Colombiana de Investiga- ción Agropecuaria Corpoica, Gobernación de Cundinamarca. Bogotá D.C., Colombia. SISTEMA GENERAL DE REGALÍAS Fondo de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación GOBERNACIÓN DE CUNDINAMARCA Orquídeas de Cundinamarca: conservación y aprovechamiento sostenible / editado por Carolina Castellanos-Castro
    [Show full text]
  • Physiology / Fisiología
    Botanical Sciences 98(4): 524-533. 2020 Received: January 08, 2019, Accepted: June 10, 2020 DOI: 10.17129/botsci.2559 On line first: October 12, 2020 Physiology / Fisiología ASYMBIOTIC GERMINATION, EFFECT OF PLANT GROWTH REGULATORS, AND CHITOSAN ON THE MASS PROPAGATION OF STANHOPEA HERNANDEZII (ORCHIDACEAE) GERMINACIÓN ASIMBIÓTICA, EFECTO DE LOS REGULADORES DE CRECIMIENTO VEGETAL Y EL QUITOSANO EN LA PROPAGACIÓN MASIVA DE STANHOPEA HERNANDEZII (ORCHIDACEAE) ID JESÚS ARELLANO-GARCÍA1, ID OSWALDO ENCISO-DÍAZ2, ID ALEJANDRO FLORES-PALACIOS3, ID SUSANA VALENCIA-DÍAZ1, ID ALEJANDRO FLORES-MORALES4, ID IRENE PEREA-ARANGO1* 1Centro de Investigación en Biotecnología, Universidad Autónoma del Estado de Morelos, Cuernavaca. Morelos, Mexico. 2Facultad de Ciencias Biológicas y Agropecuarias, Campus Tuxpan, Universidad Veracruzana, Veracruz, Mexico. 3Centro de Investigación en Biodiversidad y Conservación, Universidad Autónoma del Estado de Morelos, Cuernavaca, Morelos, Mexico. 4Facultad de Ciencias Biológicas, Universidad Autónoma del Estado de Morelos, Cuernavaca, Morelos, Mexico. *Author for correspondence: [email protected] Abstract Background: Stanhopea hernandezii was collected from natural habitat in Mexico for its beautiful fragrant flowers. Biotechnological strategies of propagation may satisfy the market demand and are useful for conservation programs. Hypothesis: Vigorous seedlings of S. hernandezii can be produced in vitro by asymbiotic seed germination techniques and the addition of chitosan to the culture medium in the temporary immersion system (RITA®) and in semi-solid medium systems. Methods: The first step was the in vitro germination of seeds obtained from a mature capsule of wild plants, followed by multiplication via adventitious protocorm induction known as protocorm-like bodies, using plant growth regulators. For this purpose, we utilized Murashige and Skoog (MS) basal medium amended with 0.5 mg/L α-Naphthaleneacetic acid, combined with different concentrations of 6- Benzylaminepurine (1, 3, and 5 mg/L).
    [Show full text]
  • Pollinator Specificity and Seasonal Patterns in the Euglossine Bee-Orchid Mutualism at La Gamba Biological Station
    Acta ZooBot Austria 156, 2019, 171–181 Pollinator specificity and seasonal patterns in the euglossine bee-orchid mutualism at La Gamba Biological Station Santiago R. Ramirez The plant family Orchidaceae exhibits some of the most spectacular and intricate ad- aptations for insect pollination. Across the Neotropical region male euglossine bees provide pollination services to approx. 700 orchid species that have evolved scent pro- duction in exchange for sexual reproduction. Male orchid bees collect scents from flowers and other sources to concoct perfume mixtures that they use as pheromone analogs during courtship display. Although the pollination biology of some of these associations has been studied in detail for some orchid taxa, community-wide analyses of this mutualism are lacking. Here I present an analysis of the plant-pollinator affilia- tion patterns and phenology among scent-producing orchids and male euglossine bees based on 960 bee-orchid interactions obtained over the course of five years of sampling at La Gamba Biological Station (south-western Costa Rica). I identify a highly nested plant-pollinator network that is composed of 24 bee species and 17 orchid genera. Some orchid genera exhibit pronounced flowering seasonality, with most of the diver- sity of interactions taking place during the dry season (March-April) and few orchid taxa blooming throughout the year. The architecture of the plant-pollinator network also revealed a substantial degree of pollinator sharing among orchid genera, suggest- ing that distantly related lineages independently converged on the use of similar pol- linator bee assemblages. RAMIREZ S.R., 2019: Bestäuberspezifizität und jahreszeitliche Variation in Pracht- bienen-Orchideen Mutualismen an der Tropenstation La Gamba.
    [Show full text]
  • Mr. Auguste R. Endrés: Not a Journey Into the Life and Work of the Greatest Orchidologist to Ever Visit Costa Rica Franco Pupulin, Carlos Ossenbach and Rudolph Jenny
    Mr. Auguste R. Endrés: Not A Journey into the life and work of the greatest orchidologist to ever visit Costa Rica FRANCO PUPULIN, CARLOS OSSENBACH AND RUDOLPH JENNY “WE GREATLY REGRET TO HEAR OF THE DEATH OF THE EXCELLENT BOTANICAL COLLECTOR, M. ENDRES. WE ARE PROMISED AN ACCOUNT OF HIS CAREER FROM PROF. Reichenbach.” (ANONYMOUS, 1875). With these scanty words, and the promise of a note on his orchidologic journey — that will never be written — botany took leave of A.R. Endrés in May 1875. His name, variously spelled as Endres, Enderes and Enders, had appeared sporadically in the Gardener’s Chronicle since 1871, associated with orchid novelties, mostly just botanical curiosities, surfacing from Costa Rica. The brief obituary of the Gardener’s Chronicle’s publisher placed a tombstone on the short and obscure career of just another plant collector who had died doing his job. Time can be unfair. It may seem strange to begin our story on Endrés from the end, but — as we will see — during some 150 years it proved to be quite difficult to unravel the story of his life from the beginning, even to find a date and a place to begin the tale of a prodigious man who had a surname, but not a known forename to start with. His end itself has long been a mystery, nothing more than a myth passed from mouth to mouth, according to which Endrés was murdered in Colombia. “Riohacha — a man lies face down near an unplucked orchid” (Kaufman and Kaufman 1999). Mr. Auguste R. Endrés: Not So Mysterious After All A Journey into the life and work of the greatest orchidologist to ever visit Costa Rica FRANCO PUPULIN, CARLOS OSSENBACH AND RUDOLPH JENNY Lycaste dowiana, dedicated to Capt.
    [Show full text]
  • The Orchid Flora of the Colombian Department of Valle Del Cauca Revista Mexicana De Biodiversidad, Vol
    Revista Mexicana de Biodiversidad ISSN: 1870-3453 [email protected] Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México México Kolanowska, Marta The orchid flora of the Colombian Department of Valle del Cauca Revista Mexicana de Biodiversidad, vol. 85, núm. 2, 2014, pp. 445-462 Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México Distrito Federal, México Available in: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=42531364003 How to cite Complete issue Scientific Information System More information about this article Network of Scientific Journals from Latin America, the Caribbean, Spain and Portugal Journal's homepage in redalyc.org Non-profit academic project, developed under the open access initiative Revista Mexicana de Biodiversidad 85: 445-462, 2014 Revista Mexicana de Biodiversidad 85: 445-462, 2014 DOI: 10.7550/rmb.32511 DOI: 10.7550/rmb.32511445 The orchid flora of the Colombian Department of Valle del Cauca La orquideoflora del departamento colombiano de Valle del Cauca Marta Kolanowska Department of Plant Taxonomy and Nature Conservation, University of Gdańsk. Wita Stwosza 59, 80-308 Gdańsk, Poland. [email protected] Abstract. The floristic, geographical and ecological analysis of the orchid flora of the department of Valle del Cauca are presented. The study area is located in the southwestern Colombia and it covers about 22 140 km2 of land across 4 physiographic units. All analysis are based on the fieldwork and on the revision of the herbarium material. A list of 572 orchid species occurring in the department of Valle del Cauca is presented. Two species, Arundina graminifolia and Vanilla planifolia, are non-native elements of the studied orchid flora. The greatest species diversity is observed in the montane regions of the study area, especially in wet montane forest.
    [Show full text]
  • Lankesteriana 4(3): 213-221
    LANKESTERIANA 4(3): 213-221. 2004. STANHOPEINAE MESOAMERICANAE (ORCHIDACEAE). III. REESTABLECIMIENTO DE STANHOPEA RUCKERI Y UNA ESPECIE NUEVA: STANHOPEA CONFUSA 1 2 GÜNTER GERLACH & JORGE BEECHE 1 Botanischer Garten München-Nymphenburg, Menzinger Str. 65, 80638 München, Alemania. [email protected] 2 Jardín Botánico Lankester, Universidad de Costa Rica ABSTRACT. Stanhopea ruckeri Lindl. is new interpreted and so reestablished. The name S. inodora is trans- fered to its synonymy, because of investigations in the Lindley Herbarium. Stanhopea gibbosa auct. is found to be not identical with the holotype of S. gibbosa Rchb.f., so it was necessary to describe it as a new species. Because of the confusion around its identity, it is named S. confusa. RESUMEN. Stanhopea ruckeri se interpreta y se reestablece. Después de examinar el Herbario de Lindley, el nombre S. inodora se transfiere a la sinonimia de S. ruckeri. Se descubrió que Stanhopea gibbosa auct. no es igual que el holotipo de S. gibbosa Rchb.f.; por tanto, se describe una especie nueva, que debido a la con- fusión sobre su identidad se nombra S. confusa. PALABRAS CLAVE / KEY WORDS: Orchidaceae, Stanhopeinae, Stanhopea confusa, Stanhopea gibbosa, Stanhopea inodora, Stanhopea ruckeri, new orchid species, Costa Rica, Panamá, Mesoamérica En el marco de los trabajos de preparación del Stanhopea, tomando en cuenta la compleja mor- tratamiento de Orchidaceae para la Flora fología de las flores. Como pionero, él hizo estudios Mesoamericana, detectamos varias curiosidades en la de plantas vivas y las comparó con las flores her- taxonomía y la sistemática de las especies de borizadas. Dodson (1963) ilustró S.
    [Show full text]
  • Epilist 1.0: a Global Checklist of Vascular Epiphytes
    Zurich Open Repository and Archive University of Zurich Main Library Strickhofstrasse 39 CH-8057 Zurich www.zora.uzh.ch Year: 2021 EpiList 1.0: a global checklist of vascular epiphytes Zotz, Gerhard ; Weigelt, Patrick ; Kessler, Michael ; Kreft, Holger ; Taylor, Amanda Abstract: Epiphytes make up roughly 10% of all vascular plant species globally and play important functional roles, especially in tropical forests. However, to date, there is no comprehensive list of vas- cular epiphyte species. Here, we present EpiList 1.0, the first global list of vascular epiphytes based on standardized definitions and taxonomy. We include obligate epiphytes, facultative epiphytes, and hemiepiphytes, as the latter share the vulnerable epiphytic stage as juveniles. Based on 978 references, the checklist includes >31,000 species of 79 plant families. Species names were standardized against World Flora Online for seed plants and against the World Ferns database for lycophytes and ferns. In cases of species missing from these databases, we used other databases (mostly World Checklist of Selected Plant Families). For all species, author names and IDs for World Flora Online entries are provided to facilitate the alignment with other plant databases, and to avoid ambiguities. EpiList 1.0 will be a rich source for synthetic studies in ecology, biogeography, and evolutionary biology as it offers, for the first time, a species‐level overview over all currently known vascular epiphytes. At the same time, the list represents work in progress: species descriptions of epiphytic taxa are ongoing and published life form information in floristic inventories and trait and distribution databases is often incomplete and sometimes evenwrong.
    [Show full text]
  • Aechmea Information Compiled by Theresa M
    Aechmea Information compiled by Theresa M. Bert, Ph.D. (corresponding author) and Harry E. Luther, Director, Mulford B. Foster Bromeliad Identification Center (last update: January 2005) Welcome to the Aechmea species list. All taxonomic entities for the genus Aechmea listed in Luther (2004) & new species & taxonomic revisions since that publication up to September 2004 are included here. The information provided for each taxon is summarized from the references & citations provided at the end of the list. In the table, the citations are denoted by superscripted numbers. This information is not all-inclusive of everything that is known about each species, but much information is included. We did not include information on citings during personal expeditions unless they were documented in the literature & also provided unique information on the biology, ecology, or taxonomy of the species. Nor did we include information on cultivation. This is a dynamic table. As authoritative information becomes available, we will update this table. We also invite input. If you know of a well-documented fact about a species in this list, please provide the corresponding author with the information & the literature citation in which that information appears. (We reserve the right to accept or deny inclusion of any information provided to us.) We also welcome your thoughts on the type of information that should be included in this list. Blank fields denote no information is available. All currently recognized taxonomic entities of each species are listed, including subspecies, varieties, & forms. When the lower taxonomic level of these plants is the same as the species, only the species name is given (e.g., Aechmea distichantha var.
    [Show full text]
  • E29695d2fc942b3642b5dc68ca
    ISSN 1409-3871 VOL. 9, No. 1—2 AUGUST 2009 Orchids and orchidology in Central America: 500 years of history CARLOS OSSENBACH INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL ON ORCHIDOLOGY LANKESTERIANA INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL ON ORCHIDOLOGY Copyright © 2009 Lankester Botanical Garden, University of Costa Rica Effective publication date: August 30, 2009 Layout: Jardín Botánico Lankester. Cover: Chichiltic tepetlauxochitl (Laelia speciosa), from Francisco Hernández, Rerum Medicarum Novae Hispaniae Thesaurus, Rome, Jacobus Mascardus, 1628. Printer: Litografía Ediciones Sanabria S.A. Printed copies: 500 Printed in Costa Rica / Impreso en Costa Rica R Lankesteriana / International Journal on Orchidology No. 1 (2001)-- . -- San José, Costa Rica: Editorial Universidad de Costa Rica, 2001-- v. ISSN-1409-3871 1. Botánica - Publicaciones periódicas, 2. Publicaciones periódicas costarricenses LANKESTERIANA i TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction 1 Geographical and historical scope of this study 1 Political history of Central America 3 Central America: biodiversity and phytogeography 7 Orchids in the prehispanic period 10 The area of influence of the Chibcha culture 10 The northern region of Central America before the Spanish conquest 11 Orchids in the cultures of Mayas and Aztecs 15 The history of Vanilla 16 From the Codex Badianus to Carl von Linné 26 The Codex Badianus 26 The expedition of Francisco Hernández to New Spain (1570-1577) 26 A new dark age 28 The “English American” — the journey through Mexico and Central America of Thomas Gage (1625-1637) 31 The renaissance of science
    [Show full text]
  • 10 Stanhopea Naurayi.Indd
    LANKESTERIANA 5(1): 77-79. 2005. ANOTHER NEW SPECIES OF STANHOPEA (ORCHIDACEAE) FROM PERU RUDOLF JENNY Moosweg 9, 3112 Allmendingen, Switzerland. [email protected] ABSTRACT. A new species of Stanhopea (S. naurayi Jenny), recently collected in Peru, is described and illustrated. Not closely allied with any other known species from Peru, it is relatively similar to some forms of the Mexican S. oculata (Lodd.) Lindl. but with flowers one third smaller. RESUMEN. Se describe e ilustra la nueva especie Stanhopea naurayi Jenny, de Perú. No es pariente cercana de ninguna otra especie conocida en Perú; más bien se parece a algunas formas de S. oculata (Lodd.) Lindl., de México, pero con flores un tercio menores. KEY WORDS / PALABRAS CLAVE: Orchidaceae, Stanhopea, Stanhopea naurayi, Peru. Together with the material of Stanhopea manriquei growths. Pseudobulbs ovoid, strongly ribbed when Jenny & Nauray, described 2004 in Lankesteriana aged and furrowed, 3 cm high and 3 cm wide, always [4(2): 109], I also got pickled and dried flowers of unifoliate. Leaves coarse and leathery, petiolate, a second unknown species (no. 7989) from David lanceolate, plicate and acute, 35-40 cm long and up Bennett jr. in Lima. As Stanhopea manriquei the other to 9 cm wide, petiole round and one-sidely notched, 7 species also showed up in the collection of Alfredo cm long. Inflorescence directed downwards from the Manrique and both have been (following David base of the pseudobulb, up to 20 cm long and with few Bennett) collected somewhere in the Department Puno (3) loosely arranged flowers, covered by large, spread without any detailed information about exact locality out broadly triangular and acute bracts.
    [Show full text]