DOCSLIB.ORG

Humanitarian Infograms Afghanistan

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Humanitarian Infograms Afghanistan Humanitarian Infograms Afghanistan Content: • Security Incidents against Aid Workers • Civilian Casualties • Landmine Casualties • Internally Displaced Persons January – March 2010 This document and the information contained in it may be reproduced totally or partially by mechanical, electronic or magnetic means, while source is always mentioned. Kabul, Afghanistan, April 2010 © Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs This product may be downloaded from: http://ochaonline.un.org/afghanistan Contact: Omar Adrian Gonzalez de la Hoz [email protected] Synopsis Security Incidents Number of Security Incidents 45 Against Aid Workers Number of Affected Provinces 20 January – March 2010 Number of Affected Districts 31 OCHA | UN | Afghanistan Average of Security Incidents per Month 15 Source: UN Department of Safety and Security Security Incidents China Total Incidents Uzbekistan Tajikistan 1 2 3 4 - 10 Turkmenistan Turkmenistan KunduzKunduz JawzjanJawzjan BalkhBalkh TaTa kha kha r r BadakhshanBadakhshan FaryabFbF aryab SamanganSamangan BaghlanBaghlan According to UNDSS, between 1st January SariSari PulPul PanjsherPanjsher Nuristan st BadghisBadghis and 31 March 2010, a total of 45 security KunarKunar Bamyan KapisaKapisa incidents in which an aid worker was Bamyan LaghmanLaghman Kabul Kabul involved were reported in 31 districts in 10 Kabul Ghor Wardak Herat Wardak Nangarhar Herat LogarLogar Afghanistan. Daykundi KhostKhost Kabul (Kabul) is the most affected district Ghazni PaktyaPaktya followed by Kandahar (Kandahar) and Uruzgan Herat (Herat) with 10, 7 and 3 incidents FarahFarah PaktikaPaktika respectively. ZabulZabul Security Incidents: Top 10 Districts during 1st Quarter 2010 Kandahar 7 12 KandaharKandahar Pakistan 10 Hilmand IranIran Nimroz Nimroz 8 6 4 2 0 Security Incidents against Aid Workers by Incident Type Security Incidents Intimidation of aid workers was Against Aid Workers the most reported type of incident Intimidation during first quarter in 2010, 15 in January – March 2010 2% 2% ttltotal represen ting 28%fth28% of the a ll Others incidents. OCHA | UN | Afghanistan 4% Crime 4% Source: UN Department of Safety and Security 4% 28% Abduction 5% Arrest Armed clash 11% IED detonated Suicide attack Assassination 24% 16% Mine/UXO incident Year/Month Jan Feb Mar 2009 18 33 28 2010 20 14 20 Security Incidents against Aid Workers by Target Group Except for January 2010, there was a decrease of security incidents against aid workers in 2010’s first quarter compared with the same period in 2009. 100% Nat NGO 90% 80% Int NGO 70% Security Incidents against Aid Workers by Month (Comparison: 2009 and 2010) 60% Civilians 50% 35 40% 30 30% 20% UN 25 10% 20 2009 Incidents 0% 2010 % Sec. Inc. No. 15 10 5 The UN (21 incidents) was the most 0 targeted group during the first quarter of Jan Feb Mar 2010 followed by Civilians (18 Incidents) Months contracted on a temporary basis for aid agency, according to UNDSS reports. The Security Incidents against aid workers’ Percentage of Change (between 1st quarter 2009 Security Incidents and 1st quarter 2010), is a measure of difference between the number of incidents that Against Aid Workers occurred during 1st quarter 2009 and the number of incidents that occurred during 1st quarter 2010. The sign of deviation, either positive or negative, indicates whether the total of Percentage of Change between st incidents occurred during 1 quarter 2010 is larger than or smaller than the total of incidents 1st Qu arter 2009 and 1st QarterQuarter occurred during 1st quarter 2009. The magnitude of the value reports how different (in the percentage scale shown in the right) the total of incidents occurred during 1st quarter in 2010 2010 is from the total of incidents occurred during 1st quarter in 2009. OCHA | UN | Afghanistan Source: UN Department of Safety and Security China Uzbekistan Tajikistan Security Incidents Percentage of Change Decrease >100% Decrease between 99.99% and 0.01% Nor Decrease or Increase Kaldar Increase between 0.01% and 50% Turkmenistan 100.00 % Increase >100% Turkmenistan KunduzKunduz JawzjanJawzjan BalkhBalkh Ta kha r Badakhshan FaryabFaryab Aliabad Ta kha r Badakhshan 100.00 % 100% Increase: There are 21 districts Almar 100.00 % SamanganSamangan BaghlanBaghlan where no security incidents against aid Muqur SariSari PulPul Kahmard workers were reported by UNDSS in first Nari 100.00 % 100.00 % Nuristan Badghis Sayd Khel 100.00 % Badghis 100.00 % quarter 2009, and where during the first ParwanParwan KunarKunar Bamyan Mir Kohsan Bamyan Bacha Kot quarter 2010 there were incidents 100.00 % 100.00 % Kabul Bihsud Herat KabulKabul reported in those districts by the same Ghor 53.33 % 100.00 % 66.67 % Ghor Wardak Nangarhar LogarLogar Pachir source. HHerateear a t Wa Agam 100.00 % Daykundi Charkh 100.00 % PaktyaPaktya Increase between 1% and 67%: Kabul Ghazni KhostKhost Tan i (Kabul), Pashtun Kot (Faryab), Herat Chora 100.00 % 100.00 % (Herat), Kandahar (Kandahar) and FarahFarah UruzganUruzgan PaktikaPaktika Pusht Rod Zabul Gardez (Paktya), are districts with an 100.00 % Zabul increase of security incidents in the first quarter 2010 compared with the same Lashkar Gah period in 2009. 100.00 % KandaharKandahar Zaranj Pakistan 100.00 % Nor increase or decrease: Chapa Dara Iran Hilmand Iran NimrozNimroz (Kunar), Fayzabad (Badakhshan), Maymana (Faryab), Tirin Kot (Uruzgan) and Saydabad (Wardak) districts did not present any change in these two periods. Decrease: Kunduz (Kunduz), Puli Alam (Logar) and Jalalabad (Nangarhar) presented a decrease of incidents during these two compared periods. Synopsis Civilian Casualties Number of Civilian Deaths 583 Number of Injured Civilians 906 January – March 2010 Number of Affected Districts 132 OCHA | UN | Afghanistan Source: UN Office of the High Commissioner of Human Rights China Civilian Casualties Total Civilian Deaths Uzbekistan Tajikistan Incident without Civilian Deaths 1 - 7 8 - 17 18 - 33 34 - 57 Turkmenistan JawzjanJawzjan KunduzKunduz BalkhBalkh TaTa kha kha r r BadakhshanBadakhshan Between 1st January and 31st SamanganSamangan March, the UN Office of the High BaghlanBaghlan Commissioner of Human Rights SariSari PulPul Faryab Faryab Nuristan (UNOHCHR) reported 583 civilian Badghis Badghis ParwanParwan deaths and 906 injured civilians in KunarKunar BamyanBamyan 132 districts in Afghanistan. Kabul Ghor Wardak Kabul LogarLogar Nangarhar 30% o f all civili an death s durin g th e Herat Daykundi first quarter in 2010 were in three Paktya Ghazni Paktya districts: Nad Ali (Hilmand), KhostKhost Shahidi Lashkar Gah (Hilmand), and Hassas Uruzgan 33 FarahFarah Kandahar (Kandahar). Zabul Dihrawud Zabul 22 PaktikaPaktika Nahri Sarraj Nad Ali 22 Kandahar 57 Lashkar 51 Kandahar Gah Kandahar Civilian Casualties: Top 10 Districts during 1st Quarter 2010 52 Pakistan 60 Iran Iran NimrozNimroz 50 40 30 Hilmand 20 10 0 Civilian Casualties by Incident Type Civilian Casualties 3% According to the UN Office of 3% IED 4% the High Commissioner of Human Rights, the most deadly 27% Suicide Attack (BB/ January – March 2010 8% VB) type of incident for civilians is Shooting IED followed by Suicide Attack OCHA | UN | Afghanistan (BB/VB). 48% of the civilian Air Attack Source: UN Office of the High Commissioner of Human 9% deaths during first quarter 2010 Rights Execution/ are attributed to these two Assassination causes. Mortar/ Rocket/ Grenade Attack 12% Search/ Raid 21% Escalation of Force/ Force Protection 13% Ground Engagement Y/MthYear/Month Jan FbFeb Mar 2009 170 180 191 2010 139 147 118 Civilian Casualties by st Condition There was a decrease of civilian deaths duringgp the period between 1 January 100% and 31st March 2010 compared with the same period in 2009. 80% Injured 60% 40% Civilian Casualties by Month (Comparison: 2009 and 2010) 20% Killed 200 0% 180 160 Condition 140 120 Deaths 2009 100 2010 80 The UN Office of the High 60 Civilian 40 Commissioner of Human Rights No 20 reported 61% of the civilian 0 casualties d uri ng thi s peri o d in Jan Feb Mar 2010 were injured. Months The Civilian Casualties’ Percentage of Change (between 1st quarter in 2009 and 2010), is a Civilian Casualties measure of difference between the number of civilian deaths occurred during 1st quarter st Percentage of Change between 2009 and the number of civilian deaths occurred during 1 quarter 2010. The sign of st st deviation, either positive or negative, indicates whether the total of civilian deaths occurred 1 Quarter 2009 and 1 Quarter during 1st quarter 2010 is larger than or smaller than the total of civilian deaths occurred 2010 during 1st quarter 2009. The magnitude of the value reports how different (in the percentage OCHA | UN | Afghanistan scale shown in the right) the total of civilian deaths occurred during 1st quarter in 2010 is Source: UN Office of the High Commissioner of Human st from the total of civilian deaths occurred during 1 quarter in 2009. Rights China Civilian Casualties Uzbekistan Tajikistan PtfChPercentage of Change Decrease >100% Decrease between 99.99% and 0.01% Nor Decrease or Increase Increase between 0.01% and 50% Turkmenistan JawzjanJawzjan Khwaja Ghar Increase > 50% Turkmenistan Qush Tepa BalkhBalkh 100.00 % 100.00 % Mazari Shari KunduzKunduz 100.00 % Aliabad TaTa kha kha r r BadakhshanBadakhshan Sari Pul 100.00 % 100.00 % 100% Increase: There are 26 districts without SamanganSamangan civilian deaths reported in the first quarter FaryabFaryab BaghlanBaghlan 2009, whilst during the first quarter 2010 Muqur SariSari PulPul Shutul 87.50 % there were
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Maah/Mrrd/Fao/Wfp National Crop Output Assessment
    FAO FAAHM/AFGHANISTAN OSRO/AFG/111/USA MAAH/MRRD/FAO/WFP NATIONAL CROP OUTPUT ASSESSMENT 10th May to 5th June 2003 Farmer met in Badghis while weeding his rain-fed wheat field, 23 May 2003. Raphy Favre, FAO/FAIT Agronomist Consultant, Mission TL Anthony Fitzherbert, FAO Consultant Javier Escobedo, FAO Emergency Agronomist Consultant 25th July 2003 Kabul TABLE OF CONTENT I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY II. INTRODUCTION III. METHODOLOGY 1. Estimation of Yield 1.1 Field Measurements for Yield Estimates 1.2 Crop Development Stage at the Time of the Assessment 1.3 Interviews with Farmers in the Field 1.4 Selection of Districts and Transects 1.5 Selection of Fields 2. Estimation of Land planted 3. Market Prices IV. RESULTS 4. Estimated Planted Area 4.1 Irrigated Land 4.2 Rain-fed Land 5. Estimated Wheat Yield 5.1 Irrigated Land 5.2 Rain-fed Land 6. Estimated Wheat Production 6.1 Irrigated Land 6.2 Rain-fed Land 6.3 Total Production 6.4 Agricultural Constraints in 2003 7. Estimated Barley Production at Regional Level 8. Wheat Grain Prices V. CONCLUSION & RECOMMENDATIONS ANNEXES ANNEX I - Changes of the Itinerary and Teams Composition due to Security Situation in Southern Afghanistan ANNEX II - Participants ANNEX III - Mission Itinerary and Districts covered by the Survey 2 TABLES Table 1: Estimated irrigated cultivated land in 2003; Total irrigated land cultivated In 2003, irrigated Wheat cultivated and irrigated Barley cultivated in 2003. Table 2: Estimated rain-fed cultivated land in 2003; Total rain-fed land cultivated in 2003, rain-fed Wheat cultivated and rain-fed Barley cultivated in 2003.
    [Show full text]
  • Men, Masculinities, Conflict and Peacebuilding in Afghanistan
    Navigating norms and insecurity: Men, masculinities, conflict and peacebuilding in Afghanistan WORKING PAPER | NOVEMBER 2018 Henri Myrttinen European Union initiative CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ........................................................................................................................... 1 INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................................................... 2 GENDER, CONFLICT AND PEACEBUILDING .............................................................................................. 3 Why masculinities? ............................................................................................................................. 4 BACKGROUND ......................................................................................................................................... 5 Project background ............................................................................................................................. 5 Women, peace and security in Afghanistan ....................................................................................... 6 Background to the target provinces ................................................................................................... 7 RESEARCH FINDINGS ............................................................................................................................. 11 Gender norms ..................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Update on Firing Ranges (Frs), June 2021 Firing Ranges (Frs) Background
    State Ministry for Disaster Management and Humanitarian Affairs Directorate of Mine Action Coordination (DMAC) Mine Action Programme of Afghanistan (MAPA) Update On Firing Ranges (FRs), June 2021 Firing Ranges (FRs) Background Total # # of FRs # of FRs # of FRs # of FRs # of FRs Countries Remarks of FRs Surveyed Completed Cancelled Released Remaining United 85 85 62 0 62 23 UK also have contribution in some State (US) US FRs in Helmand Province German 6 3 2 0 2 4 Fortunately Germany also contracted its one FR in Balkh. Status of 3 FRs is not clear yet. New 5 5 0 1 1 4 Four FRs is ongoing and will be Zealand completed by November 2021 (NZ) Different 16 16 2 2 4 12 Two FRs cleared and two were Countries cancelled Grand 112 109 66 3 69 43 Total Firing Ranges (FRs) Geographical Locations & Status Map Graphical Representation – FRs Status 1,400 1,235 1,200 1,000 800 679.5 600 540 400 200 15.6 - Released Worked on Open Total Achievements (LR and PDIA) § 69 FRs , covering 540 sq. km area released. § Over 184,000 items of EO destroyed § Post Demining Impact Assessment (PDIA) conducted on 21 released FRs. After FR clearance the land is used for agriculture Released/Closed FRs Location Map 69 FRs Released/Closed- 540 Sq Km FRs Remaining Contamination Location Map 39 FRs Open - 679.5 Sq Km 4 FRs Worked on – 15.6 Sq Km Remaining Open FRs-Details Region Province District Village Contaminated By Status Hazard ID Hazard Name Longitude Latitude Hazard Area FR Belongs To Remarks Central Kapisa Tagab Tagab ANSF/NATO/ISAF Open Hz-ID-22430 AF/0205/00827/FR0001B
    [Show full text]
  • Länderinformationen Afghanistan Country
    Staatendokumentation Country of Origin Information Afghanistan Country Report Security Situation (EN) from the COI-CMS Country of Origin Information – Content Management System Compiled on: 17.12.2020, version 3 This project was co-financed by the Asylum, Migration and Integration Fund Disclaimer This product of the Country of Origin Information Department of the Federal Office for Immigration and Asylum was prepared in conformity with the standards adopted by the Advisory Council of the COI Department and the methodology developed by the COI Department. A Country of Origin Information - Content Management System (COI-CMS) entry is a COI product drawn up in conformity with COI standards to satisfy the requirements of immigration and asylum procedures (regional directorates, initial reception centres, Federal Administrative Court) based on research of existing, credible and primarily publicly accessible information. The content of the COI-CMS provides a general view of the situation with respect to relevant facts in countries of origin or in EU Member States, independent of any given individual case. The content of the COI-CMS includes working translations of foreign-language sources. The content of the COI-CMS is intended for use by the target audience in the institutions tasked with asylum and immigration matters. Section 5, para 5, last sentence of the Act on the Federal Office for Immigration and Asylum (BFA-G) applies to them, i.e. it is as such not part of the country of origin information accessible to the general public. However, it becomes accessible to the party in question by being used in proceedings (party’s right to be heard, use in the decision letter) and to the general public by being used in the decision.
    [Show full text]
  • Central Region CP 2012.Pdf (English)
    Central Region Contingency Plan Humanitarian Regional Team Multi-Hazard Contingency Plan Central Region (Kabul, Kapisa, Logar, Wardak, Panjshir and Parwan Provinces) Period Covered March – December 2012 Last updated 19 Mar 2012 Central Region Contingency Plan Central Region Contingency Plan Table of Contents 1 Introduction .............................................................................................. 4 1.1 Regional Context by Hazards .................................................................... 4 1.1.1 Hazards and Risk Analysis .................................................................. 6 1.1.2 Cross-cutting Risks ........................................................................... 7 2 Coordination Arrangements ............................................................................ 8 2.1 National / Local Authorities’ responsibilities ................................................. 8 2.1.1 Disaster occurrence ......................................................................... 8 2.1.2 Operational procedures ..................................................................... 8 2.2 Humanitarian community: UN AFPs, INGOs and NNGOs ..................................... 9 2.2.1 The cluster approach ........................................................................ 9 2.3 Overview of Emergency Preparedness and Response Partners .... Error! Bookmark not defined. 2.4 Response Matrix................................................................................... 10 ANNEXES (see separate
    [Show full text]
  • Country Profiles
    Global Coalition EDUCATION UNDER ATTACK 2020 GCPEA to Protect Education from Attack COUNTRY PROFILES AFGHANISTAN Attacks on education accelerated in Afghanistan during the reporting period. In 2018, a dramatic rise in attacks on schools occurred, almost half of which were associated with the use of educational facilities for voter registration and polling; polling-related attacks also occurred throughout the 2019 presidential elections process. Threats and attacks against students and education personnel also increased, particularly in areas of the country controlled by non-state armed groups. Context The 2017-2019 reporting period saw increased fighting between theAfghan government, international forces, and non- state armed groups, including the Taliban and the “Islamic State of Khorasan Province” (ISKP) in Afghanistan. In 2019, multiple peace talks between the United States and the Taliban took place in Qatar amidst ongoing fighting, however no peace deal was reached during the reporting period.238 Fighting between armed parties, along with targeted attacks by the Taliban and “ISKP”, caused substantial numbers of civilian casualties.239 In 2019, the United Nations Assistance Mission in Afghanistan (UNAMA) recorded 3,403 civilian deaths and 6,989 civilian injuries – the lowest level of civilian casualties recorded since 2013.240 However, significant periods of violence occurred during the year; between July and September 2019, UNAMA recorded the highest number of civilian casualties in a single quarter since 2009.241 Violence particularly impacted young people in 2019, when the UN reported that children comprised 30 percent of all civilian causalities and 78 percent of all casualties from explosive remnants of war (ERW) and landmines.242 Rising insecurity appeared to have a negative effect on school attendance.
    [Show full text]
  • AFGHANISTAN: Health Organizations in Districts (3W) October 2012
    AFGHANISTAN: Health Organizations in Districts (3W) October 2012 Darwaz AKDN Darwazbala AKDN 2 3 DRAFT Shaki 2 AKDN Kuf Ab AKDN WORK IN PROGRESS 2 Khw2ahan TA J I K I S T A N CAF, Medair Raghistan 3 CAF, Kinder Berg Shighnan Note: WHO supports government in national coverage U Z B E K I S TA N AKDN 5 Darqad Chah Ab CAF 2 Yangi CAF Yawan Kohistan 3 Q3ala 5 Shahri Buzurg CAF CAF, Merlin 1 CAF Qarqin Khwaja BahCaAwF uddin BDN, MOVE 2 CAF, Turkish 4 Yaftal Sufla 2 2 Shortepa Foundation CAF, 6Kinder 3 CHA Berg, Merlin Fayzabad Kham Ab Dashti 1 Sharak Hairatan 2 AKDN1,4 ARCS, Arghanj BDN, MOVE Imam Sahib Qala CAF, ICRC, Shahada Khaw Khani Chahar Mangajek Kaldar ARCS, Merlin CAF Kinder CAF, SHDP 5 Khwaja Du 3 Berg, MoPH CAF Qurghan Bagh 1 MOVE, SAF CHA 13 9 4 3 AADA Koh Mardyan C H I N A AADA 2 2 8 Dashte Archi Rustaq Argo 1 SAF BDN Dawlatabad Khwaja Baha3rak Kinder Berg, 4 CAF, CDAP CAF Kinder Berg, Jawzjan CHA Ghar 5 Merlin Hazar Merlin, SHDP 1 2 Aqcha Qalay-I- Zal CAF Sum1uch Khash 2 Khulm Kunduz Andkhoy BDN Chahar Bolak Balkh Merlin SHDP Kishim Darayim SHDP 2 CA4F, Kinder 3 Qaramqol Khaniqa 7 ARCS, 4 Nahri CHA Kunduz Baharak 3 CAF, AADA Fayzabad ARCS, CHA 12 7 5 23 Berg, Merlin Jurm Warduj AADA 1 BDN, MOVE BDN, CHA, Mazari ShSahraifhi ARCS, Kinder Taluqan Kinder Berg 2 BDN Kinder Berg, SHDP ARCS, Kinder 3 Kinder Berg, AFGA, ARCS, CHA, IAM, Berg, Merlin, Kalfagan 7 Tashkan 3 JACK CHA MoPH, 1B5erg, MoPH, Merlin, 5 AKDN, Shibirghan LEPCO, MoPH, MSI, Chahar Dara SHDP 22 Marmul Spinzar SHDP, Turkish CAF, Kinder Berg, Ishkashiem Afghan turk, Merlin
    [Show full text]
  • AFGHANISTAN Ministry of Agriculture and Animal Husbandry FAAHM Food, Agriculture and Animal Husbandry Information Management and Policy Unit
    AFGHANISTAN Ministry of Agriculture and Animal Husbandry FAAHM Food, Agriculture and Animal Husbandry Information Management and Policy Unit Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations AGRICULTURE AND FOOD PRODUCTION IN POST-WAR AFGHANISTAN A REPORT ON THE WINTER AGRICULTURAL SURVEY 2002-2003 Hector Maletta - Raphy Favre Kabul, August 2003 With technical support provided by FAO íthrough the Agriculture and Economic Develop- ment Division (ESA) and Emergency Operations and Rehabilitation Division (TCE)í and financial support provided by the United States of America (OSRO/AFG/111/USA), Germany (GCP/AFG/026/GER), and the World Food Programme (Afghanistan Country Office). Executive summary Four fifths of the Afghan population live in rural areas, and most are farmers or farm labourers. The Winter Survey provides an account of the structure of the farming sector and the rural farming population in Afghanistan, with an emphasis on food security. The 2002-2003 crop season in Afghanistan was the first one planted and harvested in relative peace, after the end of a long period of domestic and international strife and political instability, and also the first one after the long drought that afflicted the country since 1999, a plight that in many parts of the country ended only with the Autumn rains in late 2002. After staging a healthy recovery in 2002, but still with many areas under the effects of the drought, agriculture in Afghanistan continued its recovery in the 2002-2003 crop year with a significant increase in areas planted, and an very good harvest. This report is mainly based on a nationwide survey, the Winter Survey (December 2002-January 2003), which covered all the agro-ecological zones and relevant watersheds, interviewing nearly 5000 farmers in more than 500 rural communities.
    [Show full text]
  • Count Region Province District Village IS ID SHA ID SVP Lat SVP Long
    ANNEX 10 - SHAs identified during Confirmation Assessment Count Region Province District Village IS ID SHA ID SVP Lat SVP Long SHA Area SHA Device SHAstatus No of Hazards Surveyed Area of Hazards 1 Central Kabul Bagrami Butkhak CA-6 CA-4 34.46378 69.42714 306,000 AP Cancelled 2 Central Kabul Dih Sabz Khwaja Chesht HQ-1083 CA-3 34.65697 69.25761 70,000 AP Closed 1 53552 3 Central Kabul Guldara Deh-e Myana HQ-1288 CA-3 34.74586 69.03626 4,000 AP/ERW Closed 1 2000 4 Central Kabul Kabul Aqebe Zearat u Sakhy HQ-1757 CA-2 34.87142 69.24842 100,000 AP Closed 1 33549 5 Central Kabul Kabul Centeral army devision HQ-1737 CA-2 34.46156 69.11007 90,000 AP Closed 2 99538 6 Central Kabul Kabul KABUL CA-5 CA-1 34.51401 69.18581 1,950 AP Cancelled 7 Central Kabul Kabul PUL CHARKHAI CA-2 CA-1 34.54718 69.33878 22,000 AP Closed 1 14380 8 Central Kabul Kabul Qala-I- Hashmatkhan HQ-322 CA-2 34.49690 69.18284 80,000 AP Closed 3 227116 9 Central Kabul Kalakan Zama HQ-169 CA-6 34.70583 69.19410 74,000 AP Cancelled 10 Central Kabul Mir Bacha Kot Mushwani Bala HQ-301 CA-7 34.76641 69.09549 1,485 AP Cancelled 11 Central Kabul Paghman Badamqol HQ-833 CA-6 34.46465 68.91219 960,000 AP/AT Closed 17 859371 12 Central Kabul Paghman Gulghandi (Katakhel) HQ-856 CA-5 34.50769 68.37740 370,000 AP/ERW Cancelled 13 Central Kabul Paghman Qal'eh-ye Hakim HQ-835 CA-5 34.60910 68.96502 5,000 AP Closed 1 9204 14 Central Kabul Paghman Qal'eh-ye Hakim HQ-835 CA-6 34.61459 68.96737 93,000 AP Cancelled 15 Central Kabul Qarabagh Qarah Bagh CA-15 CA-1 34.83640 69.24240 176,000 AP/AT/ERW
    [Show full text]
  • AFGHANISTAN South: Fighting and Civilian Displacement Continued
    AFGHANISTAN Weekly Humanitarian Update (24 – 30 May 2021) KEY FIGURES IDPs IN 2021 (AS OF 30 MAY) 115,825 People displaced by conflict (verified) 100,730 Received assistance (including 2020 caseload) NATURAL DISASTERS IN 2021 (AS OF 30 MAY) 22,624 Number of people affected by natural disasters Conflict incident UNDOCUMENTED RETURNEES Internal displacement IN 2021 (AS OF 30 MAY) 473,480 Disruption of services Returnees from Iran 5,233 Returnees from Pakistan 12 South: Fighting and civilian displacement continued Returnees from other Fighting between Afghan National Security Forces (ANSF) and a non-state countries armed group (NSAG) continued in Hilmand, Kandahar and Zabul provinces with HUMANITARIAN RESPONSE improvised explosive device (IED) attacks and armed clashes that affected PLAN (HRP) REQUIREMENTS & civilians and humanitarian activities. FUNDING In Kandahar province, armed clashes were reported in Panjwaiy, Shah Wali Kot, 1.28B Khakrez, Maywand and Zheray districts. A total of 3,500 people from Maywand Requirements (US$) – HRP district were displaced to Kandahar city due to fighting with further displacement 2021 predicted due to continued fighting. Insecurity and illegal check points in Khakrez, Shah Wali Kot and Dahla Dam are affecting farmers who are not able to access 171.5M water for their agricultural activities in Arghandab, Panjwaiy, Zheray Kandahar 13.4% funded (US$) in 2021 Dand and Daman districts. AFGHANISTAN HUMANITARIAN In Hilmand province, fighting continued in Bolan, Nahr-e-Saraj, Lashkargah, Nad- FUND (AHF) 2021 e-Ali and Nawa-e-Barakzaiy districts. According to WHO, the Bolan Basic Health Clinic in Hilmand province was recently closed due to fighting in the area 40.70M depriving more than 13,000 people of their access to basic health services.
    [Show full text]
  • Humanitarian Who What Where Humanitarian Who What Where
    +XPDQLWDULDQ:KR:KDW:KHUH $IJKDQLVWDQ 3URJUHVV5HSRUWDVRIVW -DQXDU\ 3UHOLPLQDU\UHYLHZRIWKHGDWD More detailed reports may be prepared via: http://3w.unocha.org This document and the information contained in it may be reproduced totally or partially by mechanical, electronic or magnetic means, while source is always mentioned. Sources: National and International NGOs, United Nations. Ka bu l, AfAfgh han ist an, Fe bruary 2010 © Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs Send your feedback and/or inputs to Omar Adrian Gonzalez de la Hoz ([email protected]) WhoͲWhatͲWhere NumberofPrimaryBeneficiariesperOrganizationandSector Education AͲAid 3,692 AAoB 90 BRAC 120,000 CARE 32,230 CHA 48,347 DRSA 180 IOM 5,800 JACK 2,975 OxfamGB 500 SCA 182,668 SCͲSN 49,003 SVF 1,496 UMCOR 250 WADAN 1,834 WCH 6,063 EmergencyShelter ACTED 21,000 UMCOR 450 FoodSecurityandAgriculture AͲAid 4,088 ActionAid 13,416 CaritasGermany 9,030 Concern 150,000 CRS 60,000 DACAAR 205 MADERA 15,090 OxfamGB 7,481 OXFAMNovib 8,349 WFP Logistics PACTEC 4,000 MultiͲSector AͲAid 1,423,806 MADERA 0 Solidarités 25,000 Nutrition OXFAMNovib 90,831 Protection INTERSOS 48 WCH 1,016 WASH ACF 276,850 ACTED 5,408 ActionAid 0 CaritasGermany 15,435 Concern 25,000 CRAA 200,000 DACAAR 949,836 MADERA 0 Solidarités 418,688 TearFund 17,710 UMCOR 12,000 CapacityBuilding ACTED 178 ActionAid 17,680 CaritasGermany 60 MADERA 1,115 OxfamGB 351,500 OXFAMNovib 5,510 TearFund 18,000 WhoͲWhatͲWhere InterventionsMatrixbyProvince FoodSecurityand Province Education Wash EmergencyShelter EmergencyTelecoms
    [Show full text]
  • Detailed Social and Gender Assessment
    Horticulture Value Chain Development Sector Project (RRP AFG 51039) Supplementary Document 21: Detailed Social and Gender Assessment Contents Acronyms i 1. Executive Summary 1 2. Current Socio-economic Situation 3 2.1. Increase in the poverty rate 3 2.2. Conflict and Food Security 4 3. Population 6 3.1. Internally displaced people 7 3.2. Returnees 8 4. Ethnicity 9 5. Gender 10 5.1. National Gender Situation Overview 10 5.2. Women’s Access to Justice 11 5.3. Women and Health Care 11 5.4. Women and Education 12 5.5. Women and Employment 13 5.6. Women and Agriculture in Afghanistan 14 6. Education 16 7. Health 19 7.1. Children Health 19 7.2. Maternal Health 19 8. Employment 20 8.1. Economic sectors and socio-economic development 21 8.2. Formal and informal employment 21 8.3. Unemployment and economic migrants 22 8.4. Agriculture and employment 22 9. Access to Services 23 10. Provinces 24 10.1. Bamyan 25 10.2. Ghazni 26 10.3. Kabul 27 10.4. Khost 29 10.5. Kunar 30 10.6. Laghman 30 10.7. Logar 32 10.8. Nangahar 33 10.9. Paktya 34 10.10. Paktika 35 10.11. Wardak 36 Acronyms ALCS Afghanistan Living Condition Survey ANP Afghan National Police IDP Internally Displaced Person IPC Intergrated Food Security Phase Classification MAIL Ministry of Agriculture, Irrigation and Livestock NGO non-government organization i 1. Executive Summary 1. Afghanistan ranks 169th1 (out of 188 countries) in the United Nations Development Programme Human Development Index. This index is based on a number of economic, social, and health factors.
    [Show full text]