DOCSLIB.ORG

Einstein's Dice and Schrödinger's

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Einstein's Dice and Schrödinger's Free ebooks ==> www.Ebook777.com www.Ebook777.com Einstein’s Dice and Schrödinger’s Cat Free ebooks ==> www.Ebook777.com www.Ebook777.com Einstein’s Dice and Schrödinger’s Cat How Two Great Minds Battled Quantum Randomness to Create a Unifi ed Theory of Physics Paul Halpern, PhD A Member of the Perseus Books Group New York Free ebooks ==> www.Ebook777.com Copyright © 2015 by Paul Halpern Published by Basic Books, A Member of the Perseus Books Group All rights reserved. Printed in the United States of America. No part of this book may be reproduced in any manner whatsoever without written permission except in the case of brief quotations embodied in critical articles and reviews. For infor- mation, address Basic Books, 250 West 57th Street, New York, NY 10107. Books published by Basic Books are available at special discounts for bulk pur- chases in the United States by corporations, institutions, and other organizations. For more information, please contact the Special Markets Department at the Perseus Books Group, 2300 Chestnut Street, Suite 200, Philadelphia, PA 19103, or call (800) 810-4145, ext. 5000, or e-mail [email protected]. Designed by Pauline Brown Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Halpern, Paul, 1961– Einstein’s dice and Schrödinger’s cat : how two great minds battled quantum randomness to create a unifi ed theory of physics / Paul Halpern, PhD. pages cm Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 978-0-465-07571-3 (hardcover) — ISBN 978-0-465-04065-0 (e-book) 1. Quantum chaos. 2. Quantum theory—Philosophy. 3. Physics—Philosophy. 4. Unifi ed fi eld theories. 5. Einstein, Albert, 1879–1955. 6. Schrödinger, Erwin, 1887–1961. I. Title. QC174.17.C45H35 2015 530.13'3—dc23 2014041325 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 www.Ebook777.com Dedicated to the memory of Max Dresden, my PhD advisor, whose passion for the history of twentieth-century physics was truly inspiring Free ebooks ==> www.Ebook777.com Well who am I? (This question is meant in general, the “I” not referring just to the present writer.) The Image of God, gifted with power of thought to try and understand His world. However naive my attempt at this may be, I do have to value it higher than scrutinizing Nature for the purpose of inventing a device to . say, avoid splashing my spectacles in eating a grapefruit, or other very handy conveniences of life. —Erwin Schrödinger, “The New Field Theory” www.Ebook777.com Contents Acknowledgments ix introduction Allies and Adversaries 1 chapter one The Clockwork Universe 13 chapter two The Crucible of Gravity 43 chapter three Matter Waves and Quantum Jumps 75 chapter four The Quest for Unification 109 chapter five Spooky Connections and Zombie Cats 127 chapter six Luck of the Irish 159 chapter seven Physics by Public Relations 183 chapter eight The Last Waltz: Einstein’s and Schrödinger’s Final Years 203 conclusion Beyond Einstein and Schrödinger: The Ongoing Search for Unity 223 Further Reading 237 Notes 241 Index 255 vii Free ebooks ==> www.Ebook777.com www.Ebook777.com Acknowledgments would like to acknowledge the outstanding support of my family, I friends, and colleagues in helping me see this project to completion. Thanks to the faculty and staff of the University of the Sciences, in- cluding Helen Giles-Gee, Heidi Anderson, Suzanne Murphy, Elia Es- chenazi, Kevin Murphy, Brian Kirschner, and Jim Cummings, and to my colleagues in the Department of Math, Physics, and Statistics and the Department of Humanities, for supporting my research and writing. I am grateful for the camaraderie of the history of science community, including the APS Forum on the History of Physics, the Philadelphia Area Center for History of Science, and the AIP Center for History of Physics. The warm support of the Philadelphia Science Writers Associ- ation, including Greg Lester, Michal Mayer, Faye Flam, Dave Goldberg, Mark Wolverton, Brian Siano, and Neil Gussman, is most appreciated. Thanks to historians of science David C. Cassidy, Diana Buchwald, Tilman Sauer, Daniel Siegel, Catherine Westfall, Robert Crease, and Peter Pesic for useful suggestions and to Don Howard for offering helpful references. I greatly appreciate the help of Schrödinger’s family, including Leonhard, Arnulf, and Ruth Braunizer, in addressing ques- tions about his life and work. I’m grateful to musician Roland Orzabal and philosopher Hilary Putnam for kindly answering questions about their work. Thanks to science writer Michael Gross for his friendly advice on German culture and language. I appreciate the encourage- ment of David Zitarelli, Robert Jantzen, Linda Dalrymple Hender- son, Roger Stuewer, Lisa Tenzin-Dolma, Jen Govey, Cheryl Stringall, Tony Lowe, Michael LaBossiere, Peter D. Smith, Antony Ryan, David Bood, Michael Erlich, Fred Schuepfer, Pam Quick, Carolyn Brodbeck, Marlon Fuentes, Simone Zelitch, Doug Buchholz, Linda Holtzman, Mark Singer, Jeff Shuben, Jude Kuchinsky, Kris Olson, Meg and Woody Carsky-Wilson, Carie Nguyen, Lindsey Poole, Greg Smith, Joseph Ma- guire, Doug DiCarlo, Patrick Pham, and Vance Lehmkuhl. I offer my ix Free ebooks ==> www.Ebook777.com Acknowledgments sincere appreciation to Ronan and Joe Mehigan for their photographs of Schrödinger locations in Dublin. Thanks to the Princeton Univer- sity Library Manuscripts Division for permission to peruse the Albert Einstein Duplicate Archives and other research materials and to the American Philosophical Society Library for access to the Archive for the History of Quantum Physics. Many thanks to Barbara Wolff and the Albert Einstein Archives in Jerusalem for reviewing my quotes from Einstein’s correspondence to Schrödinger. Thanks to the Royal Irish Academy for information about their proceedings. I thank the John Simon Guggenheim Foundation for a 2002 fellowship, during which I fi rst encountered the Einstein-Schrödinger correspondence. Thanks to my editor, T. J. Kelleher, for his outstanding guidance and useful suggestions, and to the staff of Basic Books, including Collin Tracy, Quynh Do, Betsy DeJesu, and Sue Warga, for their help. I thank my marvelous agent, Giles Anderson, for his enthusiastic support. Special thanks to my wife, Felicia; my sons, Eli and Aden; my par- ents, Bernice and Stanley Halpern; my in-laws, Arlene and Joseph Fin- ston; Richard, Anita, Jake, Emily, Alan, Beth, Tessa, and Ken Halpern; Aaron Stanbro; Lane and Jill Hurewitz; Shara Evans; and other family members for all their love, patience, advice, and support. x www.Ebook777.com INTRODUCTION Allies and Adversaries his is the tale of two brilliant physicists, the 1947 media war that Ttore apart their decades-long friendship, and the fragile nature of scientifi c collaboration and discovery. When they were pitted against each other, each scientist was a Nobel laureate, well into middle age, and certainly past the peak of his major work. Yet the international press largely had a different story to tell. It was a familiar narrative of a seasoned fi ghter still going strong versus an upstart contender hungry to seize the trophy. While Albert Einstein was extraordinarily famous, his every pronouncement covered by the media, relatively few readers were conversant with the work of Aus- trian physicist Erwin Schrödinger. Those following Einstein’s career knew that he been working for decades on a unifi ed fi eld theory. He hoped to extend the work of nineteenth-century British physicist James Clerk Maxwell in uniting the forces of nature through a simple set of equations. Maxwell had provided a unifi ed explanation for electricity and magnetism, called electromagnetic fi elds, and identifi ed them as light waves. Einstein’s own general theory of relativity described gravity as a warping of the geometry of space and time. Confi rmation of the theory had won him fame. However, he didn’t want to stop there. His dream was to incor- porate Maxwell’s results into an extended form of general relativity and thereby unite electromagnetism with gravity. Every few years, Einstein had announced a unifi ed theory to great fanfare, only to have it quietly fail and be replaced by another. Starting in the late 1920s, one of his primary goals was a deterministic alter- native to probabilistic quantum theory, as developed by Niels Bohr, Werner Heisenberg, Max Born, and others. Although he realized that quantum theory was experimentally successful, he judged it incomplete. 1 Free ebooks ==> www.Ebook777.com Einstein’s Dice and Schrödinger’s Cat In his heart he felt that “God did not play dice,” as he put it, couching the issue in terms of what an ideal mechanistic creation would be like. By “God” he meant the deity described by seventeenth-century Dutch philosopher Baruch Spinoza: an emblem of the best possible natural order. Spinoza had argued that God, synonymous with nature, was immutable and eternal, leaving no room for chance. Agreeing with Spinoza, Einstein sought the invariant rules governing nature’s mech- anisms. He was absolutely determined to prove that the world was absolutely determined. Exiled in Ireland in the 1940s after the Nazi annexation of Austria, Schrödinger shared Einstein’s disdain for the orthodox in- terpretation of quantum mechanics and saw him as a natural col- laborator. Einstein similarly found in Schrödinger a kindred spirit. After sharing ideas for unifi cation of the forces, Schrödinger suddenly announced success, generating a storm of attention and opening a rift between the men. You may have heard of Schrödinger’s cat—the feline thought ex- periment for which the general public knows him best. But back when this feud took place, few people outside of the physics community had heard of the cat conundrum or of him. As depicted in the press, he was just an ambitious scientist residing in Dublin who might have landed a knockout punch on the great one. The leading announcer was the Irish Press, from which the interna- tional community learned about Schrödinger’s challenge.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Belated Decision in the Hilbert-Einstein Priority Dispute
    (10). As described above, the severely opis- Dinosauria (Univ. of California Press, Berkeley, CA, However, the overall similarity of the pelvis of Archae- 1990). opteryx to those of the enantiornithine birds, espe- thopubic condition of their pelvis is consis- 10. L. Hou, L. D. Martin, Z. Zhou, A. Feduccia, Science cially the presence of the hypopubic cup, as well as tent with the notion that these birds roost- 274, 1164 (1996). the morphology of the London and Berlin Archae- ed in trees. In contrast, based primarily on 11. Q. Ji and S. Ji, Chin. Geol. 10, 30 (1996); see also V. opteryx specimens, offer support for our interpreta- disputed measurements of claw curvature, Morell, Audubon 99, 36 (1997). tion of the pelvic structure of these early birds [L. D. 12. Rather than representing primitive archosaurian Martin, in Origin of the Higher Groups of Tetrapods, Archaeopteryx has been interpreted as structures, it is probable that the hepatic-piston dia- H. P. Schultze and L. Trueb, Eds. (Cornell Univ. adapted primarily for a terrestrial rather phragm systems in crocodilians and theropods are Press, Ithaca, NY, 1991), pp. 485–540. than an arboreal existence (18). However, convergently derived. Pelvic anatomy in early “pro- 18. D. S. Peters and E. Go¨ rgner, in Proceedings of the II todinosaurs” such as Lagosuchus, as well as in all International Symposium of Avian Paleontology, K. as in the enantiornithines, the morphology ornithischian dinosaurs, shows no evidence of the Campbell, Ed. (Los Angeles Museum of Natural His- of Archaeopteryx’s pelvis is best interpreted pubis having served as a site of origin for similar tory Press, Los Angeles, CA, 1992), pp.
    [Show full text]
  • Einstein's Washington Manuscript on Unified Field Theory
    Einstein’s Washington Manuscript on Unified Field Theory Tilman Sauer∗ and Tobias Schütz† Institute of Mathematics Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz D-55099 Mainz, Germany Version of August 25, 2020 Abstract In this note, we point attention to and briefly discuss a curious manu- script of Einstein, composed in 1938 and entitled “Unified Field Theory,” the only such writing, published or unpublished, carrying this title without any further specification. Apparently never intended for publication, the manuscript sheds light both on Einstein’s modus operandi as well as on the public role of Einstein’s later work on a unified field theory of gravitation and electromagnetism. arXiv:2008.10005v1 [physics.hist-ph] 23 Aug 2020 ∗[email protected] †[email protected] 1 1 The “Washington manuscript” In July 1938, the Princeton based journal Annals of Mathematics published a paper On a Generalization of Kaluza’s Theory of Electricity in its Vol. 39, issue No. 3 (Einstein and Bergmann, 1938). The paper was co-authored by Albert Einstein (1879–1955) and his then assistant Peter Gabriel Bergmann (1915– 2002). It presented a new discussion of an approach toward a unified theory of the gravitational and electromagnetic fields based on an extension of the number of physical dimensions characterizing space-time. Such five-dimensional theories had been discussed already a number of times, notably by Theodor Kaluza in 1921, and then again in the late twenties by Oskar Klein and others (Goenner, 2004). Einstein had contributed to the discussion already in 1923 and in 1927, but had given up the approach in favor of another one based on distant parallelism (Sauer, 2014).
    [Show full text]
  • Einstein's Equations for Spin $2 $ Mass $0 $ from Noether's Converse
    Einstein’s Equations for Spin 2 Mass 0 from Noether’s Converse Hilbertian Assertion November 9, 2016 J. Brian Pitts Faculty of Philosophy, University of Cambridge [email protected] forthcoming in Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics Abstract An overlap between the general relativist and particle physicist views of Einstein gravity is uncovered. Noether’s 1918 paper developed Hilbert’s and Klein’s reflections on the conservation laws. Energy-momentum is just a term proportional to the field equations and a “curl” term with identically zero divergence. Noether proved a converse “Hilbertian assertion”: such “improper” conservation laws imply a generally covariant action. Later and independently, particle physicists derived the nonlinear Einstein equations as- suming the absence of negative-energy degrees of freedom (“ghosts”) for stability, along with universal coupling: all energy-momentum including gravity’s serves as a source for gravity. Those assumptions (all but) imply (for 0 graviton mass) that the energy-momentum is only a term proportional to the field equations and a symmetric curl, which implies the coalescence of the flat background geometry and the gravitational potential into an effective curved geometry. The flat metric, though useful in Rosenfeld’s stress-energy definition, disappears from the field equations. Thus the particle physics derivation uses a reinvented Noetherian converse Hilbertian assertion in Rosenfeld-tinged form. The Rosenfeld stress-energy is identically the canonical stress-energy plus a Belinfante curl and terms proportional to the field equations, so the flat metric is only a convenient mathematical trick without ontological commitment. Neither generalized relativity of motion, nor the identity of gravity and inertia, nor substantive general covariance is assumed.
    [Show full text]
  • Selected Papers on Teleparallelism Ii
    SELECTED PAPERS ON TELEPARALLELISM Edited and translated by D. H. Delphenich Table of contents Page Introduction ……………………………………………………………………… 1 1. The unification of gravitation and electromagnetism 1 2. The geometry of parallelizable manifold 7 3. The field equations 20 4. The topology of parallelizability 24 5. Teleparallelism and the Dirac equation 28 6. Singular teleparallelism 29 References ……………………………………………………………………….. 33 Translations and time line 1928: A. Einstein, “Riemannian geometry, while maintaining the notion of teleparallelism ,” Sitzber. Preuss. Akad. Wiss. 17 (1928), 217- 221………………………………………………………………………………. 35 (Received on June 7) A. Einstein, “A new possibility for a unified field theory of gravitation and electromagnetism” Sitzber. Preuss. Akad. Wiss. 17 (1928), 224-227………… 42 (Received on June 14) R. Weitzenböck, “Differential invariants in EINSTEIN’s theory of teleparallelism,” Sitzber. Preuss. Akad. Wiss. 17 (1928), 466-474……………… 46 (Received on Oct 18) 1929: E. Bortolotti , “ Stars of congruences and absolute parallelism: Geometric basis for a recent theory of Einstein ,” Rend. Reale Acc. dei Lincei 9 (1929), 530- 538...…………………………………………………………………………….. 56 R. Zaycoff, “On the foundations of a new field theory of A. Einstein,” Zeit. Phys. 53 (1929), 719-728…………………………………………………............ 64 (Received on January 13) Hans Reichenbach, “On the classification of the new Einstein Ansatz on gravitation and electricity,” Zeit. Phys. 53 (1929), 683-689…………………….. 76 (Received on January 22) Selected papers on teleparallelism ii A. Einstein, “On unified field theory,” Sitzber. Preuss. Akad. Wiss. 18 (1929), 2-7……………………………………………………………………………….. 82 (Received on Jan 30) R. Zaycoff, “On the foundations of a new field theory of A. Einstein; (Second part),” Zeit. Phys. 54 (1929), 590-593…………………………………………… 89 (Received on March 4) R.
    [Show full text]
  • Einstein's Life and Legacy
    Reflections Einstein's Life and Legacy Introduction Albert Einstein is the most luminous scientist of the past century, and ranks with Isaac Newton as one among the greatest physicists of all time. There is an enormous amount of material to choose from in talking about Einstein. He is without doubt also the most written about scientist of the past century, may be of all time. The Einstein Archives contain about 43,000 documents, and so far as I know the "Collected Papers of Albert Einstein" have only come upto 1917 with Volume 8 in English translation; another 32 volumes remain to be produced. In the face of all this, this account must be severely selective, and coherent as well. Einstein's life was incredibly rich and intense in the intellectual sense. This will become clear as I go along. In any case let me begin by presenting in Box 1 a brieflisting of a few important dates in his life, howsoever inadequate it may be. He was scientifically active essentially from 1902 upto 1935 at the highest imaginable levels, thus for more than three decades. The Miraculous Year Now let us turn to technical matters. First, a brief mention of his creative outburst of 1905, whose centenary we are celebrating this year. There were four fundamental papers, and the doctoral thesis, all in the six months from March to September. The first paper on the light quantum concept and explanation of the photo electric effect was submitted to Annalen der Physik in March; the second on Brownian Motion in May; and the third setting out the Special Theory of Relativity in June.
    [Show full text]
  • PLUNGE #305 - William K
    20--MANCHESTER HERALD, Friday, Oct. 1.^, 1989 READ YOUR AD: ClassiFed odvertlsoments a r t I qi^ cars I CARS [g^CARS I CARS W E D ELIVER taken by telephone os o conyenlence. The FOR SALE FOR SALE FOR SALE Manchester Herald Is responsible For only one FOR SALE For Horr>© Del: 'sry. Call Incorrect Insertion and then only tor the size oF 6 4 7 - 9 9 4 6 the original Insertion. E . rorswhichdonot lessen the yolue oF the advertisement will not be 1984 HONDA Civic Wagon CHEVROLET 1980 Ma­ O L D S M O B IL E 1981 R e­ CHEVROLET 1985 Celeb­ Monday to Friday. 9 to 6 - 646-0767 or 649-4554, libu - 4 door, good gency - Loaded, must rity wagon. Excellent corrected by on additional Insertion._____________ J o c k . ________ condition. $1,250. 643- sell. 643-1364.___________ condition. V-6 auto­ 1986 JEEP Wogoneer Li­ 5484. 1984 CELEBRITY-4door, matic, power steerlng- /brakes, air, cruise. CARS mited - Excellent con­ CHEVROLET 1974 Co­ Fully equipped, excel­ CARS CARS dition, 43,000 miles, moro - New point, new lent condition. $3,500. $4,500 or best otter. IQI i FOR SALE 647-8894. FOR SALE automatic, olr condl- vinvl top, 6 cylinder 1987 MUSTANG LX - 4 I^^H foR sale FOR SALE tlonlng, om/tm automatic, $1,750. Ne­ cylinder, hatchback, 5 cassette, leather Inte- gotiable. 649-8944, speed, $6,500. 646-2392. rlor. $10,900, 643-2938. leave message. TRUCKS/VANS 1984 FORD Escort Wagon C O R V E T T E 1971 S tlno STEAL It.
    [Show full text]
  • Cracking the Einstein Code: Relativity and the Birth of Black Hole Physics, with an Afterword by Roy Kerr / Fulvio Melia
    CRA C K I N G T H E E INSTEIN CODE @SZObWdWbgO\RbVS0W`bV]T0ZOQY6]ZS>VgaWQa eWbVO\/TbS`e]`RPg@]gS`` fulvio melia The University of Chicago Press chicago and london fulvio melia is a professor in the departments of physics and astronomy at the University of Arizona. He is the author of The Galactic Supermassive Black Hole; The Black Hole at the Center of Our Galaxy; The Edge of Infinity; and Electrodynamics, and he is series editor of the book series Theoretical Astrophysics published by the University of Chicago Press. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago 60637 The University of Chicago Press, Ltd., London © 2009 by The University of Chicago All rights reserved. Published 2009 Printed in the United States of America 18 17 16 15 14 13 12 11 10 09 1 2 3 4 5 isbn-13: 978-0-226-51951-7 (cloth) isbn-10: 0-226-51951-1 (cloth) Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Melia, Fulvio. Cracking the Einstein code: relativity and the birth of black hole physics, with an afterword by Roy Kerr / Fulvio Melia. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. isbn-13: 978-0-226-51951-7 (cloth: alk. paper) isbn-10: 0-226-51951-1 (cloth: alk. paper) 1. Einstein field equations. 2. Kerr, R. P. (Roy P.). 3. Kerr black holes—Mathematical models. 4. Black holes (Astronomy)—Mathematical models. I. Title. qc173.6.m434 2009 530.11—dc22 2008044006 To natalina panaia and cesare melia, in loving memory CONTENTS preface ix 1 Einstein’s Code 1 2 Space and Time 5 3 Gravity 15 4 Four Pillars and a Prayer 24 5 An Unbreakable Code 39 6 Roy Kerr 54 7 The Kerr Solution 69 8 Black Hole 82 9 The Tower 100 10 New Zealand 105 11 Kerr in the Cosmos 111 12 Future Breakthrough 121 afterword 125 references 129 index 133 PREFACE Something quite remarkable arrived in my mail during the summer of 2004.
    [Show full text]
  • 0045-Flyer-Einstein-En-2.Pdf
    FEATHERBEDDINGCOMPANYWEIN HOFJEREMIAHSTATUESYN AGOGEDREYFUSSMOOSCEMETERY MÜNSTERPLATZRELATIVI TYE=MC 2NOBELPRIZEHOMELAND PERSECUTIONAFFIDAVIT OFSUPPORTEMIGRATIONEINSTEIN STRASSELETTERSHOLOCAUSTRESCUE FAMILYGRANDMOTHERGRANDFAT HERBUCHAUPRINCETONBAHNHOF STRASSE20VOLKSHOCHSCHULEFOU NTAINGENIUSHUMANIST 01 Albert Einstein 6 7 Albert Einstein. More than just a name. Physicist. Genius. Science pop star. Philosopher and humanist. Thinker and guru. On a par with Copernicus, Galileo or Newton. And: Albert Einstein – from Ulm! The most famous scientist of our time was actually born on 14th March 1879 at Bahnhofstraße 20 in Ulm. Albert Einstein only lived in the city on the Danube for 15 months. His extended family – 18 of Einstein’s cousins lived in Ulm at one time or another – were a respected and deep-rooted part of the city’s society, however. This may explain Einstein’s enduring connection to the city of his birth, which he described as follows in a letter to the Ulmer Abend- post on 18th March 1929, shortly after his 50th birthday: “The birthplace is as much a unique part of your life as the ancestry of your biological mother. We owe part of our very being to our city of birth. So I look on Ulm with gratitude, as it combines noble artistic tradition with simple and healthy character.” 8 9 The “miracle year” 1905 – Einstein becomes the founder of the modern scientific world view Was Einstein a “physicist of the century”? There‘s no doubt of that. In his “miracle year” (annus mirabilis) of 1905 he pub- lished 4 groundbreaking works along- side his dissertation. Each of these was worthy of a Nobel Prize and turned him into a physicist of international standing: the theory of special relativity, the light quanta hypothesis (“photoelectric effect”), Thus, Albert Einstein became the found- for which he received the Nobel Prize in er of the modern scientific world view.
    [Show full text]
  • Essays on Einstein's Science And
    MAX-PLANCK-INSTITUT FÜR WISSENSCHAFTSGESCHICHTE Max Planck Institute for the History of Science PREPRINT 63 (1997) Giuseppe Castagnetti, Hubert Goenner, Jürgen Renn, Tilman Sauer, and Britta Scheideler Foundation in Disarray: Essays on Einstein’s Science and Politics in the Berlin Years ISSN 0948-9444 PREFACE This collection of essays is based on a series of talks given at the Boston Colloquium for Philosophy of Science, March 3 – 4, 1997, under the title “Einstein in Berlin: The First Ten Years.“ The meeting was organized by the Center for Philosophy and History of Science at Boston University and the Collected Papers of Albert Einstein, and co-sponsored by the Max Planck Institute for the History of Science. Although the three essays do not directly build upon one another, we have nevertheless decided to present them in a single preprint for two reasons. First, they result from a project that grew out of an earlier cooperation inaugurated by the Berlin Working Group “Albert Einstein.“ This group was part of the research center “Development and Socialization“ under the direction of Wolfgang Edel- stein at the Max Planck Institute for Human Development and Education.1 The Berlin Working Group, directed by Peter Damerow and Jürgen Renn, was sponsored by the Senate of Berlin. Its aim was to pursue research on Einstein in Berlin with particular attention to the relation between his science and its context. The research activities of the Working Group are now being continued at the Max Planck Institute for the History of Science partly, in cooperation with Michel Janssen, John Norton, and John Stachel.
    [Show full text]
  • Sacred Rhetorical Invention in the String Theory Movement
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Communication Studies Theses, Dissertations, and Student Research Communication Studies, Department of Spring 4-12-2011 Secular Salvation: Sacred Rhetorical Invention in the String Theory Movement Brent Yergensen University of Nebraska-Lincoln, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/commstuddiss Part of the Speech and Rhetorical Studies Commons Yergensen, Brent, "Secular Salvation: Sacred Rhetorical Invention in the String Theory Movement" (2011). Communication Studies Theses, Dissertations, and Student Research. 6. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/commstuddiss/6 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Communication Studies, Department of at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Communication Studies Theses, Dissertations, and Student Research by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. SECULAR SALVATION: SACRED RHETORICAL INVENTION IN THE STRING THEORY MOVEMENT by Brent Yergensen A DISSERTATION Presented to the Faculty of The Graduate College at the University of Nebraska In Partial Fulfillment of Requirements For the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Major: Communication Studies Under the Supervision of Dr. Ronald Lee Lincoln, Nebraska April, 2011 ii SECULAR SALVATION: SACRED RHETORICAL INVENTION IN THE STRING THEORY MOVEMENT Brent Yergensen, Ph.D. University of Nebraska, 2011 Advisor: Ronald Lee String theory is argued by its proponents to be the Theory of Everything. It achieves this status in physics because it provides unification for contradictory laws of physics, namely quantum mechanics and general relativity. While based on advanced theoretical mathematics, its public discourse is growing in prevalence and its rhetorical power is leading to a scientific revolution, even among the public.
    [Show full text]
  • Einstein, Eddington, and the Eclipse: Travel Impressions
    EINSTEIN, EDDINGTON, AND THE ECLIPSE: TRAVEL IMPRESSIONS ESSAY 195 INTRODUCTION The total solar eclipse that occurred on 29 May 1919—perhaps considered the most famous solar eclipse ever—was exceptional for a variety of scientific, political, social, and even religious reasons. At just over five minutes of totality (more precisely, 302 seconds), it was a long eclipse. Behind the sun appeared the Taurus constellation, which included the Hyades, the brightest star cluster in the ecliptic. The preparations of the British teams that observed it, and which are the subject of this essay, took place in the middle of the Great War, during a period of international instability. The observation locations selected by these specialists were in the tropics, in distant regions unknown to most astronomers, and thus required extensive preparations. These places included the city of Sobral, in the north-eastern state of Ceará in Brazil, and the equatorial island of Príncipe, then part of the Portuguese empire, and today part of the Republic of São Tomé and Príncipe. Located in the Gulf of Guinea on the West African coast, Príncipe was then known as one of the world’s largest cocoa producers, and was under international suspicion for practicing slave labour. Additionally, among the teams of expeditionary astronomers from various countries—including the United Kingdom, the United States, and Brazil—there was not just one, but two British teams. This was an uncommon choice given the material, as well as the scientific and financial effort involved, accentuated by the unfavourable context of the war. The expedition that observed at Príncipe included Arthur Stanley Eddington (1882– 1944), the astrophysicist and young director of the Cambridge Observatory, as well as the clockmaker and calculator Edwin Turner Cottingham (1869–1940); the expedition that visited Brazil included Andrew Claude de la Cherois Crommelin (1865–1939), and Charles Rundle Davidson (1875–1970), both experienced astronomers at the Greenwich Observatory (see pp.
    [Show full text]
  • Miniaturized Single Particle Dissolution Testing
    MINIATURIZED SINGLE PARTICLE DISSOLUTION TESTING Sami Svanbäck University of Helsinki Faculty of Pharmacy Division of Pharmaceutical Technology September 2013 Contents LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS................................................................................ 1 INTRODUCTION.........................................................................................................1 2 DISSOLUTION.............................................................................................................1 2.1 Three physical models of dissolution....................................................................3 2.2 Three single particle models of dissolution, and beyond.......................................6 2.3 The intrinsic dissolution rate..................................................................................9 3 SOLUBILITY .............................................................................................................10 4 FACTORS AFFECTING THE DISSOLUTION RATE AND SOLUBILITY IN AQUEOUS MEDIA – IN VITRO AND IN VIVO.........................................................13 4.1 Sink conditions.....................................................................................................14 4.2 The effect of pH...................................................................................................14 4.3 Particle size, shape and agitation.........................................................................16 4.4 Solid state properties............................................................................................18
    [Show full text]