DOCSLIB.ORG

The Descendants of Thomas Lamkin

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Descendants of Thomas Lamkin THE DESCENDANTS OF THOMAS LAMKIN THE DESCENDANTS OF THOMAS LAMKIN OF THE NORTHERN NECK OF VIRGINIA Compiled by Dr. Harold E. Wilkins Edited by Barbara J. Mathews, CG 17^ r ^t? NEWBURY STREET PRESS Boston, Massachusetts 2001 Published and distributed by NEWBURY STREET PRESS 101 Newbury Street Boston, Massachusetts 02116-3007 special publications imprint of the New England Historic Genealogical Society All rights reserved Copyright © 2001 New England Historic Genealogical Society International Standard Book Number: 0-88082-116-7 Library of Congress Card Number: 00-108587 No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or any information storage or retrieval systems, without permission in writing from the copyright holder, except for the inclusion of brief quotations in a review. Printed in the United States of America TABLE OF CONTENTS Preface vii First Generation 1 Second Generation 11 Third Generation 25 Fourth Generation 47 Fifth Generation 103 Sixth Generation 173 Bibliography .231 Index 239 Preface My grandmother was Bertha Ella Lamkin (1873-1896) of Franklin County, Maine. Her great grandfather, Arial, arrived undocumented in the town of Jay just before the turn of the 18th century. He was traced up the Androscoggin River to Stratford, New Hampshire and thence to Stratford, Connecticut, the origin of the only Lamkin family at that time in New England. Arial's great grandfather, Thomas3, was seen in the vital records of Eastham, Massachusetts, where he married in 1719. He was similarly undocumented. No definitive monograph or book devoted to the Lamkin surname has been found. Research into 17th century court records of Virginia's Northern Neck, while studying the Southern Lamkins, led to the discovery of three individuals, all named Thomas Lamkin. They were a generation apart, seemingly father, son and grandson, residing near the head of the very short Yeocomico River which empties into the Potomac River a short distance from the Chesapeake Bay. This finding, nowhere published, led to this book which is devoted to the first six generations of this family. Lamkin has been used throughout as the spelling of the name despite many other variations; most commonly Lampkin, Lambkin and Lamkins. The surname is the same. From the very beginning different spellings are seen, with documents not uncommonly demonstrating two versions in the same archive. My research has led me to believe that perhaps the origin of more than 90% of persons in this country with this surname, regardless of spelling or race could possibly be traceable to Thomas Lamkin (c.1620-1665) of Northumberland County, Virginia. Thomas Saxe of Lancaster Co., Virginia, in a will dated 11 Jan 1654/551 names a Mr. Lamkin and his wife who are to receive cattle. Note, however, that, if this refers to our Thomas Lamkin, who is documented in this county at this time, it would be the only time in the records where he received the title "Mr." 'Beverly Fleet, Virginia Colonial Abstracts, Vol. I, 4, citing Lancaster Co., Va. Record Book 2, 1644-1656,11. vii No connection between Jeremiah Lampin of Surry County, Virginia and the Lamkin family was found. Lambdens also came to Virginia in the early 1600's and include a Robert Lambden who owned property in Westmoreland and Northumberland Counties. This is a separate unrelated surname as is Lumpkin, which is also at times confused with Lampkin. While I have had the good fortune to have capable, experienced, professional help in constructing this book, the responsibility for the amateurish flavor and the inevitable errors is mine. Many pardons for each. I am greatly indebted to the many Lamkin, Lampkin, Lambkin and Lamkins cousins who have made contributions and given assistance with this publication. Foremost are the following. John Frederick Dorman who edited an article in his The Virginia Genealogist7 for Barbara Mathews and me, revising and correcting citations to primary Virginia records. These have been utilized in Chapters 2-4, many identified with the initials, JFD. Secondly to the late Richard Henry Lampkin, Jr. (11 Jul 1911-23 Oct 1999) of Bradenton, FL who made his meticulous unpublished research into the fourth, fifth and sixth generations of his Northern Neck line available to me. His work is acknowledged by his initials in the citations. Thirdly to BettyJean Thomas of Bluffdale, Utah whose greatly admired mother in law was a California Lamkin with roots in the Culpeper County, Virginia branch for which, unfortunately, thus far, only onomastic connections to the Northumberland County Lamkins have been found. Betty Jean's research, which now may be found on the web in LDS's Ancestral File, also extends over decades and was kindly made available and utilized mainly for generations seven to twelve which are to be available in manuscript form at the NEHGS Library at 101 Newbury Street in Boston. It is anticipated that this MSS will eventually be posted on the NEHGS website. The many others who have provided information for this book have been recognized in a footnote at an appropriate place in the text to follow. Among those deserving special recognition are: Charles Putnam of Acton, Massachusetts who first postulated the occupation of mariner for Thomas3; Margaret F. Ernest of Seattle and Nancy French Dodge of Colebrook, N.H. 2Wilkins & Mathews, The Legatees of Hannah (Cox) [Lamkin] Demonville, 8 Sep 1744, Westmoreland Co., Va., The Virginia Genealogist, vol. 43, [1999], 83-101, 200-217. Vlll for help with Northern States and Canadian lines; Ella Henning for Michigan descendants; W. Preston Haynie for Northumberland Co., Va. court house records; Darlene Tallent for Westmoreland Co. court house records. Robert Rudolph, Deborah Mullins, Dorothy Groh, Cynthia Johnson, Dorothy Sudikas, Sybil K. Woods and Richard I. Luht, III are representatives of those who sent multiple contributions and are gratefully acknowledged. Sincere thanks to the staff at the Newbury Street Press, Thomas Kozachek, Jayna Stafford and Linda Austin, under the guidance and direction of D. Brenton Simons and to co-author Barbara Mathews who organized my genealogical notes and put them into manuscript form all the while supplementing the same with her own research. Truly a great effort and an invaluable key to this project. HaroldE. Wilkins, M.D. geneohal@aol. com Downey, California 21 June 2000 IX First Generation 1. THOMAS1 LAMKIN, b. prob. England, poss. Norwich, Norfolk, say 1610, if he can be identified with the Thomas Lamkin in the bill of complaint cited below, or at least bef. 1626, assuming he was 21 years old when he married; d. bef. 20 November 1665, when his orphan Mary was put out to John and Elizabeth Modey;'1' m. (1) bef. 1647, when their eldest son was bom, ELEANOR ,[21 emigrated to Virginia from England bef. 6 October 1653, when Thomas received land for having brought her over, d. bet. 14 November 1662 and 20 November 1665; m. (2) prob. in Northumberland County, Virginia, bef. 20 November 1665, CONNEGAN WALKER, dau. of John Walker; Thomas and Connegan (Walker) Lamkin had no known children. Little can be said for certain about Thomas1 Larrikin's origins.13' Nor is it known when or under what circumstances he came to the Virginia Colony. A bill of complaint by the Fellows and Scholars of Christ's College, Cambridge, against one William Armiger, dated 21 June 1634, mentions a Thomas Lamkin as a late renter of a three-quarter-acre croft near North Creek Priory, in Norwich, Norfolk.'4' If this is the same Thomas, then he emigrated to the Virginia Colony sometime after 1634, possibly as an indentured servant, a common means of paying one's passage. Learning the profitable but labor-intensive occupation of tobacco farming and, perhaps, working for his own freedom, he would have had to accumulate enough wealth to pay for Eleanor's passage. She must have arrived before 1647, when her eldest child, John, was born. The family located in Lancaster County in the recently opened Northern Neck, a peninsula jutting into the Chesapeake Bay between the Potomac and Rappahannock Rivers. This area was known as •Northumberland Co., Va., Court Order, 1652-1678,213 (FHL 32,642). See also W Preston Haynie, Records of Indentured Servants and of Certificates of Land, Northumberland County, Virginia (Bowie, Md.: Heritage Books, 1996), 81. "Her last name was abstracted as "?Lusher," but this may well have been Lamkin. On the surname Lamkin-Lambkin-Lampkin, Percy Hide Reaney notes that for "the suffix -kin ... a Flemish origin can confidently be ascribed to some of these names . Lambkin and Lampking are diminutives of Lambert, a name found in Flanders." He cites as examples the names "Lambekyn Flandrensis," "Lamkynus de Braban (of Brabant)" and "Lambert de Colom (of Bologne)." The Origin of English Surnames (New York: Barnes and Noble), 213-14. See also George Redmonds, Surnames and Genealogy (Boston: NEHGS, 1997). Today the surname is common in the counties from Lincoln to Kent on the east coast of England, as may be gleaned from a survey of names on pages 8,204 through 89,822 in the International Genealogical Index, 1992 Family History Library, hereafter (FHL). Noel Currier-Briggs, Virginia Settlers and English Adventurers, 3 vols, in 1 (Baltimore: Genealogical Publishing Company, 1970), 617-19. On 21 June 1634, Thomas Lamkin was mentioned as a late renter of 1 V/t acres of land and a 3-rood (3A acre) croft ("Joy's Croft") near North Creek Priory. 2 The Descendants of Thomas Lamkin "Chicacoan" prior to 1648 and was set aside by the colonial government for the use of the native American tribes under the control of Powhatan. After settling down, Thomas accepted the responsibility of developing a plantation.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Title 26 Department of the Environment, Subtitle 08 Water
    Presented below are water quality standards that are in effect for Clean Water Act purposes. EPA is posting these standards as a convenience to users and has made a reasonable effort to assure their accuracy. Additionally, EPA has made a reasonable effort to identify parts of the standards that are not approved, disapproved, or are otherwise not in effect for Clean Water Act purposes. Title 26 DEPARTMENT OF THE ENVIRONMENT Subtitle 08 WATER POLLUTION Chapters 01-10 2 26.08.01.00 Title 26 DEPARTMENT OF THE ENVIRONMENT Subtitle 08 WATER POLLUTION Chapter 01 General Authority: Environment Article, §§9-313—9-316, 9-319, 9-320, 9-325, 9-327, and 9-328, Annotated Code of Maryland 3 26.08.01.01 .01 Definitions. A. General. (1) The following definitions describe the meaning of terms used in the water quality and water pollution control regulations of the Department of the Environment (COMAR 26.08.01—26.08.04). (2) The terms "discharge", "discharge permit", "disposal system", "effluent limitation", "industrial user", "national pollutant discharge elimination system", "person", "pollutant", "pollution", "publicly owned treatment works", and "waters of this State" are defined in the Environment Article, §§1-101, 9-101, and 9-301, Annotated Code of Maryland. The definitions for these terms are provided below as a convenience, but persons affected by the Department's water quality and water pollution control regulations should be aware that these definitions are subject to amendment by the General Assembly. B. Terms Defined. (1) "Acute toxicity" means the capacity or potential of a substance to cause the onset of deleterious effects in living organisms over a short-term exposure as determined by the Department.
    [Show full text]
  • NON-TIDAL BENTHIC MONITORING DATABASE: Version 3.5
    NON-TIDAL BENTHIC MONITORING DATABASE: Version 3.5 DATABASE DESIGN DOCUMENTATION AND DATA DICTIONARY 1 June 2013 Prepared for: United States Environmental Protection Agency Chesapeake Bay Program 410 Severn Avenue Annapolis, Maryland 21403 Prepared By: Interstate Commission on the Potomac River Basin 51 Monroe Street, PE-08 Rockville, Maryland 20850 Prepared for United States Environmental Protection Agency Chesapeake Bay Program 410 Severn Avenue Annapolis, MD 21403 By Jacqueline Johnson Interstate Commission on the Potomac River Basin To receive additional copies of the report please call or write: The Interstate Commission on the Potomac River Basin 51 Monroe Street, PE-08 Rockville, Maryland 20850 301-984-1908 Funds to support the document The Non-Tidal Benthic Monitoring Database: Version 3.0; Database Design Documentation And Data Dictionary was supported by the US Environmental Protection Agency Grant CB- CBxxxxxxxxxx-x Disclaimer The opinion expressed are those of the authors and should not be construed as representing the U.S. Government, the US Environmental Protection Agency, the several states or the signatories or Commissioners to the Interstate Commission on the Potomac River Basin: Maryland, Pennsylvania, Virginia, West Virginia or the District of Columbia. ii The Non-Tidal Benthic Monitoring Database: Version 3.5 TABLE OF CONTENTS BACKGROUND ................................................................................................................................................. 3 INTRODUCTION ..............................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • “Willie Or Billy” Claiborne, A.K.A
    OLD WEST STORUES William Floyd “Willie or Billy” Claiborne, a.k.a. “The Kid” Or was his name Calyborne? Clayborn? Or was it Claborn? Or did Billy even know. There are copies of his signature in at least two of these versions. All his trial documents list him as Clayborne. Viola Slaughter, wife of the noted Arizona lawman John Horton Slaughter, knew him well and spelled it as Claibourne. Well, we do know for sure that he was born in Mississippi. Or was it Louisiana? But more than likely it was in Alabama. The 1870 census shows records that would fit all three states. The record for Mississippi spells the name as Claborn, but the census takers were not the best for spelling. But this one seems to best fit the bill for Billy (Photo at right) and it shows that he was born in Alabama. He stated in court that he was born on October 21, 1860, and was from Mississippi. So we accept the date and the fact that he probably meant that he was raised in Mississippi. He migrated to the Devil’s River area of west Texas where some accounts say he killed two men. He became a cowboy and went to work for John Horton Slaughter. He was part of a crew that drove a Slaughter herd of cattle from Texas to Arizona and stayed. On October 1, 1881, in Charleston, Arizona Territory (now a ghost town), he shot and killed a blacksmith named James Hickey at Harry Queen’s Saloon. Exactly why he did it is not known.
    [Show full text]
  • Maryland's 2016 Triennial Review of Water Quality Standards
    Maryland’s 2016 Triennial Review of Water Quality Standards EPA Approval Date: July 11, 2018 Table of Contents Overview of the 2016 Triennial Review of Water Quality Standards ............................................ 3 Nationally Recommended Water Quality Criteria Considered with Maryland’s 2016 Triennial Review ............................................................................................................................................ 4 Re-evaluation of Maryland’s Restoration Variances ...................................................................... 5 Other Future Water Quality Standards Work ................................................................................. 6 Water Quality Standards Amendments ........................................................................................... 8 Designated Uses ........................................................................................................................... 8 Criteria ....................................................................................................................................... 19 Antidegradation.......................................................................................................................... 24 2 Overview of the 2016 Triennial Review of Water Quality Standards The Clean Water Act (CWA) requires that States review their water quality standards every three years (Triennial Review) and revise the standards as necessary. A water quality standard consists of three separate but related
    [Show full text]
  • 2014 Virginia Freshwater Fishing & Watercraft Owner’S Guide
    2014 Virginia Freshwater Fishing & Watercraft Owner’s Guide Free Fishing Days: June 6–8, 2014 National Safe Boating Week: May 17–23, 2014 www.HuntFishVA.com Table of Contents Freshwater Fishing What’s New For 2014................................................5 Fishing License Information and Fees ....................................5 Commonwealth of Virginia Freshwater/Saltwater License Lines on Tidal Waters .........................8 Terry McAuliffe, Governor Reciprocal Licenses .................................................8 General Freshwater Fishing Regulations ..................................9 Department of Game Game/Sport Fish Regulations.........................................11 Creel and Length Limit Tables .......................................12 and Inland Fisheries Trout Fishing Guide ................................................18 Bob Duncan, Executive Director 2014 Catchable Trout Stocking Plan...................................20 Members of the Board Special Regulation Trout Waters .....................................22 Curtis D. Colgate, Chairman, Virginia Beach Fish Consumption Advisories .........................................26 Ben Davenport, Vice-Chairman, Chatham Nongame Fish, Reptile, Amphibian, and Aquatic Invertebrate Regulations........27 David Bernhardt, Arlington Let’s Go Fishing Lisa Caruso, Church Road Fish Identification and Fishing Information ...............................29 Charles H. Cunningham, Fairfax Public Lakes Guide .................................................37 Garry L. Gray,
    [Show full text]
  • Northumberland County Tidal Marsh Inventory
    W&M ScholarWorks Reports 2-1975 Northumberland County Tidal Marsh Inventory Gene M. Silberhorn Virginia Institute of Marine Science Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.wm.edu/reports Part of the Terrestrial and Aquatic Ecology Commons Recommended Citation Silberhorn, G. M. (1975) Northumberland County Tidal Marsh Inventory. Special Report in Applied Marine Science and Ocean Engineering No. 58. Virginia Institute of Marine Science, College of William and Mary. https://doi.org/10.21220/V5Z13J This Report is brought to you for free and open access by W&M ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Reports by an authorized administrator of W&M ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. NORTHUMBERLAND COUNTY TIDAL MARSH INVENTORY Special Report No. 58 in Applied Marine Science and Ocean Engineering G. M. Silberhorn Virginia Institute of Marine Science Gloucester Point, Virginia 23062 Dr. William J. Hargis, Jr., Director February 1975 Acknowledgments The publication and distribution of this report have been provided by the Department of Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Office of Coastal Zone Management, Grant No. 04-5-158-5001. The author wishes to thank Dr. William J. Hargis, Jr., Dr. Michael E. Bender, Mr. John Pleasants, Col. George Dawes and Mr. Kenneth Moore for their constructive criticism and suggestions which have assisted in the development of this publication. Thanks also to Col. Dawes and Mr. Joseph Dalton, Chairman of the Northumberland County Wetlands Board for their assistance in the field. Also, information regarding fish populations in small marshes was provided by Mr. Carl Hershner, for which I am very grateful.
    [Show full text]
  • National Register of Historic Places Registration Form
    (Rev. 1U-9D) NPS Form 10-900 OMB NO.1024-0018 United States Department of the Interior National Park Service NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES REGISTRATION FORM This form is for use In llori~inatlngor requestingdctcrminat~onsfor indiv~dualproperties and di:;uicts. See instmclions In How toConlpletc theNational Register of H~siorlcPlaces Registration Form (National Kep~stcrBullcr~n 16A). Complete each itemby marking "x" intheappropriateboxor by enterlng the information requeried Ilariy item does not apply to the propeny being ducumented, cnter "NIA" for "not applicable." For functions, architectural class~fication,~natcrials, and arras of significancc, enter only categories and subcategories from the ~nstructions Place additional entries and narrative items on conllllualton sheets (NPSFonn 10-900a) Usc a typewriter, word processor, or computer, to complete aH items. I. Name of Property historic name Kinsate Historic District other nameslsite number VDHR #096-0090 2. Location street & number Area inctudine parts of Bank Street, Great House, Kinsale, Plain View. and Kinsale Bridpe roads; Cat Nap and Yeocomico lanes, Pier Place, Sipournev Drive. an:dSteamboat Landinp. not for publication N/A city or town Kinsale vicinity state Virginia codexcounty Westmoreland code - t93 Zip 22488 3. StatelFederal Agency Certification As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act 01' 1986,as amended, 1 hereby cerlify that this -X- nomination -request for determination of eligibility meets the documentation standards for registering properties inthe National Register of Historic Places and meets the procedural and professionaI requirements set forth in 36 CFR Part 60. In my opinion, the property -X- meets -does not meet the National Register Criteria.
    [Show full text]
  • The Cowboys-Henchmen Group
    TOMBSTONE PERSONALITIES THE COWBOYS- HENCHMEN GROUP The Cowboys were a gang of rustlers and stagecoach robbers that operated in and around the Tombstone area from roughly 1876 to 1881. Although legend has portrayed them as a well-organized criminal organization, their members were known to come and go at will and the activities committed by them were rarely well planned or coordinated. Most of the crimes were random jobs committed by individual members with no other goal than to seize loot that would later be squandered in the saloons, brothels and gambling parlors of the area’s boomtowns. The Clanton family’s ranch was the unofficial headquarters of the gang and the family led many of the large scale rustling operations. Although Newman “Old Man” Clanton was considered the leader of the gang, it was an honorary title at best. Usually, the gang would ride into Mexico, round up a few hundred head of cattle and drive them back across the border, selling them to various government and private contractors in and around the Tombstone area. They gained valuable combat experience in running fights against Mexican ranchers and Federales, Mexico’s national police force and border guard. The most heinous crime ever committed by the gang was the Skeleton Canyon Massacre. It was conspicuous not only for the barbarity of the attack but for also being the biggest operation ever mounted by the gang, with most of its members participating. The Cowboys ambushed a pack train of smugglers from Mexico who used the valley to move surreptitiously between Mexico and the United States.
    [Show full text]
  • English Duplicates of Lost Virginia Records
    T iPlCTP \jrIRG by Lot L I B RAHY OF THL UN IVER.SITY Of ILLINOIS 975.5 D4-5"e ILL. HJST. survey Digitized by the Internet Archive in 2012 with funding from University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign http://archive.org/details/englishduplicateOOdesc English Duplicates of Lost Virginia Records compiled by Louis des Cognets, Jr. © 1958, Louis des Cognets, Jr. P.O. Box 163 Princeton, New Jersey This book is dedicated to my grandmother ANNA RUSSELL des COGNETS in memory of the many years she spent writing two genealogies about her Virginia ancestors \ i FOREWORD This book was compiled from material found in the Public Record Office during the summer of 1957. Original reports sent to the Colonial Office from Virginia were first microfilmed, and then transcribed for publication. Some of the penmanship of the early part of the 18th Century was like copper plate, but some was very hard to decipher, and where the same name was often spelled in two different ways on the same page, the task was all the more difficult. May the various lists of pioneer Virginians contained herein aid both genealogists, students of colonial history, and those who make a study of the evolution of names. In this event a part of my debt to other abstracters and compilers will have been paid. Thanks are due the Staff at the Public Record Office for many heavy volumes carried to my desk, and for friendly assistance. Mrs. William Dabney Duke furnished valuable advice based upon her considerable experience in Virginia research. Mrs .Olive Sheridan being acquainted with old English names was especially suited to the secretarial duties she faithfully performed.
    [Show full text]
  • VIRGINIA WORKING WATERFRONT MASTER PLAN Guiding Communities in Protecting, Restoring and Enhancing Their Water-Dependent Commercial and Recreational Activities
    VIRGINIA WORKING WATERFRONT MASTER PLAN Guiding communities in protecting, restoring and enhancing their water-dependent commercial and recreational activities JULY 2016 This planning report, Task 92 was funded by the Virginia Coastal Zone Management Program at the Department of Environmental Quality through Grant #NA15NOS4190164 of the U.S. Department of Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, under the Coastal Zone Management Act of 1972, as amended. The views expressed herein are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the U.S. Department of Commerce, NOAA, or any of its subagencies. 1 Table of Contents I. Introduction ..................................................................................................... 4 II. Acknowledgements ......................................................................................... 6 III. Executive Summary ......................................................................................... 8 IV. Working Waterfronts – State of the Commonwealth ................................. 20 V. Northern Neck Planning District Commission ............................................. 24 A. Introduction ................................................................................................................................. 25 B. History of Working Waterfronts in the Region .......................................................................... 26 C. Current Status of Working Waterfronts in the Region.............................................................
    [Show full text]
  • OK CORRAL GIJIDC MAP the October 26
    OK CORRAL GIJIDC MAP The October 26. 1881. historic and controverisal shoot-out at the OK Corral resulted in the deaths of three men and the severe wounding of two others in thirty seconds of gunplay that still echoes among these silent buildings. The inevitable confrontation climaxed months of allegations, arrests, pistol whippings, threats and rumors. On one side were Ike and Billy Clanton, supposed rustlers and highwaymen, and Tom and Frank McLaury, hard-working ranchers; on the other side were Tombstone's Chief of Police. Virgil Earp, his brothers Morgan and Wyatt(a reputed Deputy U.S. Marshal), and their friend Doc Holliday. In the bloody encounter. Frank and Tom McLaury and Billy Clanton died, and Virgil and Morgan Earp were seriously wounded. For a detailed account of the fight, buy a copy of the 1881 Edition of the TOMBSTONE EPITAPH, on sale at the Corral, or Epitaph office. V h% — LEGEND 1 -Ticket Office and Waiting n-Horse and Mule Stall Room Entrance to Tombstone 12-Entrance to Site of Earp- Historama. Clanton Gunfight 2-Teamster5 Recreation Room, 13-Stalls containing 1879 hearse. 14-Crib 3-Bunkhouse for Caretaker. containing items from 18S0's. 15-Fly's Photo Studio 4-Jail False Fronts 16-Fly's Gallery and Rooming House 5-Doctor's Office 17-Gate to Fremont Street Wild Bunch 6-Saloon Shows and 18-Cowboy'5 Dance Hall 7-Bank filming movies 19-lke Clanton 8-Two-Story Building: 20-Billy Claiborne Down-Stairs: OK Corral Office 21-Tom McLaury Up-Stairs: Sleeping Quarters for Stage 22-Frank McLaury Drivers, Mule Skinners 23-Doc Holliday 9-Blacksmith shop 24-Wyatt Earp 25-Virgil Earp 10-Storage for Rigs and City of Tombstone Fire 26-Morgan Earp 'mmomim 4II1 lU' lUL Equipment 27-Billy Clanton X 28-Copyof 1881 Epitaph YOU ARE HERE .
    [Show full text]
  • M a R Y L a N D V I R G I N
    300 ¢ U.S. Coast Pilot 3, Chapter 12 26 SEP 2021 77°20'W 77°W 76°40'W 76°20'W 39°N Annapolis Washington D.C. 12289 Alexandria PISCATAWAY CREEK 38°40'N MARYLAND 12288 MATTAWOMAN CREEK PATUXENT RIVER PORT TOBACCO RIVER NANJEMOY CREEK 12285 WICOMICO 12286 RIVER 38°20'N ST. CLEMENTS BAY UPPER MACHODOC CREEK 12287 MATTOX CREEK POTOMAC RIVER ST. MARYS RIVER POPES CREEK NOMINI BAY YEOCOMICO RIVER Point Lookout COAN RIVER 38°N RAPPAHANNOCK RIVER Smith VIRGINIA Point 12233 Chart Coverage in Coast Pilot 3—Chapter 12 NOAA’s Online Interactive Chart Catalog has complete chart coverage http://www.charts.noaa.gov/InteractiveCatalog/nrnc.shtml 26 SEP 2021 U.S. Coast Pilot 3, Chapter 12 ¢ 301 Chesapeake Bay, Potomac River (1) This chapter describes the Potomac River and the above the mouth; thence the controlling depth through numerous tributaries that empty into it; included are the dredged cuts is about 18 feet to Hains Point. The Coan, St. Marys, Yeocomico, Wicomico and Anacostia channels are maintained at or near project depths. For Rivers. Also described are the ports of Washington, DC, detailed channel information and minimum depths as and Alexandria and several smaller ports and landings on reported by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE), these waterways. use NOAA Electronic Navigational Charts. Surveys and (2) channel condition reports are available through a USACE COLREGS Demarcation Lines hydrographic survey website listed in Appendix A. (3) The lines established for Chesapeake Bay are (12) described in 33 CFR 80.510, chapter 2. Anchorages (13) Vessels bound up or down the river anchor anywhere (4) ENCs - US5VA22M, US5VA27M, US5MD41M, near the channel where the bottom is soft; vessels US5MD43M, US5MD44M, US4MD40M, US5MD40M sometimes anchor in Cornfield Harbor or St.
    [Show full text]