DOCSLIB.ORG

Shady Grove Sector Plan Minor Master Plan Amendment

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Shady Grove Sector Plan Minor Master Plan Amendment Committee: PHED AGENDA ITEM 11A&B Committee Review: Completed March 23, 2021 Staff: Pamela Dunn, Senior Legislative Analyst Worksession Montgomery Glenn Orlin, Senior Analyst County Council Purpose: To make preliminary decisions – straw vote expected Keywords: #Shady Grove, Minor Master Plan Amendment SUBJECT Council worksession to discuss the recommendations of the Planning, Housing, and Economic Development (PHED) Committee regarding the Planning Board Draft of the Shady Grove Sector Plan Minor Master Plan Amendment. EXPECTED ATTENDEES Casey Anderson, Chair, Montgomery County Planning Board Gwen Wright, Director, Planning Department Mike Riley, Director, Montgomery Parks Carrie Sanders, Chief, Mid-County Planning, Planning Department Jessica McVary, Master Plan Supervisor, Mid-County Planning Nkosi Yearwood, Planner Coordinator, Mid-County Planning Patrick Reed, Transportation Planner Coordinator, Mid-County Planning Steve Findley, Environmental Planner Coordinator, Mid-County Planning Eric Graye, Planning Supervisor, Countywide Planning & Policy Christopher Conklin, Director, Montgomery County Department of Transportation Hannah Henn, Deputy Director, Montgomery County Department of Transportation Andrew Bossi, Director’s Office, Montgomery County Department of Transportation COUNCIL DECISION POINTS & COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION • Council will take straw votes on the recommendations of the PHED Committee regarding the Planning Board Draft of the Shady Grove Sector Plan Minor Master Plan Amendment. • The recommendations (too numerous to list here) are covered in two separate staff reports. The staff report labeled Agenda Item 11A addresses the land use; zoning; historic preservation; urban design; parks, trails and open space; and community facility recommendations in the Plan. The staff report labeled Agenda Item 11B addresses recommendations related to transportation infrastructure and adequacy, as well as development staging. DESCRIPTION/ISSUE On October 15, 2020, the Montgomery County Planning Board approved the Shady Grove Sector Plan Minor Master Plan Amendment. The Plan makes recommendations for urban design; land use and zoning; historic resources; and parks, trails and open spaces within the Shady Grove Sector Plan area, as well as recommendations intended to address transportation capacity; development staging; overall circulation; and pedestrian and bikeways connections within the Plan area. SUMMARY OF KEY DISCUSSION POINTS • The PHED Committee held three worksessions on the Plan. • The staff report for the first worksession, held on March 1, can be viewed at: https://www.montgomerycountymd.gov/council/Resources/Files/agenda/cm/2021/20210301/ 20210301_PHED2.pdf • The staff report for the second worksession, held on March 15, can be viewed at: https://www.montgomerycountymd.gov/council/Resources/Files/agenda/cm/2021/20210315/ 20210315_PHED1.pdf • The staff report for the third worksession, held on March 18, can be viewed at: https://www.montgomerycountymd.gov/council/Resources/Files/agenda/cm/2021/20210318/ 20210318_PHED-5.pdf • The Planning Board Draft of the Shady Grove Sector Plan Minor Master Plan Amendment can be viewed at: https://montgomeryplanning.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/Shady-Grove-Minor-Master- Plan-Amendment-Planning-Board-Draft-12-17-20.pdf This report contains: Staff Report for Agenda Item 11A: Memorandum on urban design, zoning, historic resources, and other land use-related recommendations Staff Report for Agenda Item 11B: Memorandum on transportation infrastructure, development staging and adequacy. Alternative format requests for people with disabilities. If you need assistance accessing this report you may submit alternative format requests to the ADA Compliance Manager. The ADA Compliance Manager can also be reached at 240-777-6197 (TTY 240-777-6196) or at [email protected] Agenda Item #11A March 23, 2021 M E M O R A N D U M March 18, 2021 TO: County Council FROM: Pamela Dunn, Senior Legislative Analyst SUBJECT: Shady Grove Sector Plan Minor Master Plan Amendment PURPOSE: Worksession – Review PHED Committee Recommendations This memorandum presents the recommendations of the Planning, Housing, and Economic Development (PHED) Committee regarding the Shady Grove Sector Plan Minor Master Plan Amendment. A separate memorandum from Glenn Orlin will address the Committee’s transportation recommendations. This memorandum covers recommendations on urban design, land use, zoning, housing, parks, trails and open space, sustainability, historic resources, and community facilities, both property-specific recommendations and broader recommendations for the Plan area in general. The PHED Committee’s recommendations are highlighted in bold. Councilmembers may wish to bring their copy of the Plan to the meeting. BACKGROUND The Shady Grove Sector Plan Minor Master Plan Amendment encompasses a plan area defined by several major transportation facilities, including Frederick Road (MD 355), the Intercounty Connector (MD 200), Shady Grove Road, Redland Road, Midcounty Highway, the Metrorail station and tracks, the CSX rail tracks, and the future Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) corridor along MD 355. The Plan area is home to a variety of residential, commercial, industrial, and institutional uses. Established residential neighborhoods are primarily in the northern and southeastern portions of the Plan area. A variety of public facilities, including Blueberry Hill Local Park, Redland Local Park, Washington Grove Conservation Park, Mill Creek Stream Valley Park, and Shady Grove Middle School provide recreational and educational opportunities to residents in these areas. Single-use commercial areas along Crabbs Branch Way, Frederick Road (MD 355) and Oakmont Avenue further define the Plan area. In addition, the Plan area is adjacent to three municipalities: the City of Rockville, the City of Gaithersburg, and the Town of Washington Grove. Since 20061, the Plan area’s size has been modified with the annexations of three properties by the Cities of Gaithersburg and Rockville. Families represent a majority of households, 72 percent, in the study area. Single-headed households account for approximately 28 percent of residents, which is comparable to the Countywide average of 30 percent. The area’s household types for owner-occupied (63 percent) and rental-occupied (36 percent) housing are comparable to the Countywide averages. The study area’s white population (57 percent) is higher than the Countywide average of 46 percent and the percentages of Asians (18 percent) and Hispanics (20 percent) are also higher than the Countywide averages of 14 percent and 18 percent, respectively. African Americans account for 14 percent of residents in the study area, which is lower than the Countywide average of 17 percent. The vision of this Sector Plan Amendment is to create a future Shady Grove Metro Station area that is home to a mixed-use, pedestrian-oriented environment with attractive streetscapes, distinctive architecture, and a sense of place that is complemented with public art, facilities and amenities, and new mobility options. This vision is consistent with the 2006 Shady Grove Sector Plan, which aimed to transform a light industrial area into a new mixed-use community near the Shady Grove Metro Station PLAN RECOMMENDATIONS On pages 18-19 of the Planning Board Draft Sector Plan Amendment, key recommendations are organized under one of the following eight categories2: Urban Design, Land Use and Zoning, Housing, Mobility, Parks, Trails and Open Space, Sustainability, Historic Resources, and Community Facilities. As the name suggests, the key recommendations offer a summarized view of the most prominent recommendations under each area of focus. I. Urban Design (pages 21-29) This Sector Plan Amendment confirms the framework recommended by the 2006 Plan; design recommendations are focused on neighborhoods that remain undeveloped or areas where potential has changed as a result of development approvals, changes in zoning, or annexations by adjacent municipalities. Design guidance is focused on commercial clusters on Shady Grove Road and Metro East, West, and South neighborhoods. According to the Sector Plan Amendment, development within the Metro neighborhoods should promote quality building and site design for all new development; prioritize development at strategic locations; focus improvements along existing streets that connect to the Metro station and communities on both sides of the rail tracks; and concentrate public open space at locations supportable by existing and proposed connections, integrated as accessible amenities. In addition, redevelopment and new construction should create a pattern of interconnected streets and public open spaces with street-oriented buildings; explore a vertical use mix, where feasible; consider horizontal mixes to retain existing uses or create unique local character; consider different and innovative types of development; prioritize development along Somerville Drive and Redland Road; reduce the size of larger blocks to promote pedestrian activity; encourage quality building and site design elements; and ensure design of new buildings provides amenities supportive of pedestrian, bicycle, and micro-mobility circulation. 1 The current Sector Plan for this area was adopted in 2006. 2 Each one a chapter in the plan. 2 With respect to urban design and open space, the Sector Plan Amendment confirms several of the components of the open space system recommended by the 2006 Plan
Load more

Recommended publications
  • National Capital Region Federal Parking Study
    National Capital Region Federal Parking Study An Accessibility-Based Approach for Federal Facilities Parking Policies September 2017 Notice This document was prepared by the U.S. Department of Transportation for the National Capital Planning Commission. The United States Government assumes no liability for the contents or use thereof. The United States Government does not endorse products or manufacturers. Trade or manufacturers’ names appear herein solely because they are considered essential to the objective of this report. ii Page Intentionally Left Blank iii Acknowledgements The U.S. Department of Transportation John A. Volpe National Transportation Systems Center (Volpe Center) prepared this study on behalf of the National Capital Planning Commission (NCPC). The project team consisted of David Daddio (team leader), Jessica Baas, and Drew Quinton of the Transportation Planning Division, Stephen Zitzow-Childs of the Organization Performance Division, and Scott Smith of the Technology Innovation & Policy Division. Kael Anderson of NCPC’s Planning Research and Policy Division was the project lead. Michael Weil, Michael Sherman, Jennifer Hirsch, and Paul Jutton contributed to the effort. NCPC and the Volpe Center would like to thank the Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments for providing access to the regional transportation model. Dusan Vuksan, Roland Milone, and Meseret Seifu fielded questions and supplied model outputs. iv Table of Contents Executive Summary ...........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Creating a Future for Greenbelt Road/MD-193
    TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE PANEL REPORT Creating a Future for Greenbelt Road/MD-193 WASHINGTON, DC SPONSORED BY: City of Greenbelt City of College Park Town of Berwyn Heights Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments June 4-5, 2018 Washington ABOUT ULI WASHINGTON A DISTRICT COUNCIL OF THE URBAN LAND INSTITUTE ULI Washington is a district council of the Urban Land Institute (ULI), a nonprofit education and research organization supported by its members. Founded in 1936, the Institute today has over 32,000 members worldwide representing the entire spectrum of land use planning and real estate development disciplines working in private enter-prise and public service. As the preeminent, multidisciplinary real estate forum, ULI facilitates the open exchange of ideas, information, and experi- ence among local, national, and international industry leaders and policy makers dedicated to creating better communities. ULI’s mission is to provide leadership in the responsible use of land and in creat- ing and sustaining thriving communities worldwide. ULI Washington carries out the ULI mission locally by sharing best practices, building consensus, and advanc- ing solutions through educational programs and community outreach initiatives. ABOUT THE TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE PANEL (TAP) PROGRAM The objective of ULI Washington’s Technical Assistance Panel (TAP) program is to provide expert, multidisciplinary, and objective advice on land use and real estate is-sues facing public agencies and nonprofit organizations in the Metropolitan Washing-ton Region. Drawing from its extensive membership base, ULI Washington conducts one and one-half day Panels offering objec- tive and responsible advice to local decision-makers on a wide variety of land use and real estate issues, ranging from site-specific projects to public pol- icy questions.
    [Show full text]
  • Shuttle Services at Metro Facilities August 2011
    Shuttle Services at Metro Facilities August 2011 Shuttle Services at Metro Facilities Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority Office of Bus Planning August 2011 Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority Office of Bus Planning Jim Hamre, Director of Bus Planning Krys Ochia, Branch Manager 600 5th Street NW Washington, DC 20001 Parsons Brinckerhoff Brian Laverty, AICP, Project Manager Nicholas Schmidt, Task Manager 1401 K Street NW, Suite 701 Washington, DC 20005 Contents Executive Summary ES-1 Existing Conditions ES-1 Policies and Procedures ES-2 Future Demand ES-3 Recommendations ES-4 Introduction 1 Study Process 3 Coordination 3 On-Site Observations 3 Operating Issues 3 Future Demand 4 Permitting and Enforcement 4 Existing Conditions 7 Key Observations 8 Operating Issues 9 Policies and Procedures 17 Permitting 17 Enforcement 19 Future Demand 25 Methodology 25 Results 28 Recommendations 33 Facility Design 34 Demand Management 37 Permitting 39 Enforcement 42 Contents | i Figures Figure ES-1: Future Shuttle Demand Estimate ES-4 Figure 1: Location of Peer U.S. Transit Agencies 4 Figure 2: Study Stations 7 Figure 3: Vehicles in Tight Turning Areas May Block Bus Bay Entrances (New Carrollton Station) 11 Figure 4: Long Kiss & Ride Queue (New Carrollton Station) 11 Figure 5: Pedestrian Shortcut (Southern Avenue Station) 11 Figure 6: Shuttle Blocking Kiss & Ride Travel Lane (King Street Station) 12 Figure 7: Shuttle Blocking Bus Stop (Anacostia Station) 13 Figure 8: Typical Signs Prohibiting Non-Authorized Access to Station Bus Bays
    [Show full text]
  • FTA WMATA Safetrack Project Management Oversight Report May
    FOIA Exemption: All (b)(6 Monthly Report SafeTrack Program Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority (WMATA) May 2017 Progress Surge 14 – Prince George’s Plaza Station to Greenbelt Station – Track 2 at completion of Surge 14. June 26, 2017 PMOC Contract Number: DTFT60-14-D-00011 Task Order Number: 006, Project Number: DC-27-5272, Work Order No. 01 OPs Referenced: 01, 25 Hill International, Inc. One Commerce Square 2005 Market Street, 17th Floor Philadelphia, PA 19103 PMOC Lead: Michael E. Radbill, P.E. Length of Time PMOC Assigned to Project under current Contract: 3 Years, 1 Month Length of Time PMOC Lead Assigned to Project: 5 Years, 2 Months TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ...................................................................................................... 1 A. PROGRAM DESCRIPTION .............................................................................................. 1 B. PROGRAM STATUS ....................................................................................................... 2 C. CORE ACCOUNTABILITY INFORMATION ....................................................................... 3 D. MAJOR PROBLEMS/ISSUES ........................................................................................... 4 MAIN REPORT ....................................................................................................................... 6 1. PROGRAM STATUS ........................................................................................................... 6 2. PROGRAM COST ............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Shady Grove Sector Plan Minor Master Plan Amendment: Work Session No
    ONTGOMERY OUNTY LANNING EPARTMENT M C P D THE MARYLAND-NATIONAL CAPITAL PARK AND PLANNING COMMISSION MCPB Item No. Date: 09/10/2020 Shady Grove Sector Plan Minor Master Plan Amendment: Work Session No. 4: Mobility Analysis Nkosi Yearwood, Planner Coordinator, Mid-County Planning Division [email protected], (301) 495-1332 Patrick Reed, Planner Coordinator, Mid-County Planning Division [email protected], (301) 495-4538 Jessica McVary, Master Plan Supervisor, Mid-County Planning Division [email protected], (301) 495-4723 Carrie Sanders, Chief, Mid-County Planning Division [email protected], (301) 495-4653 Completed: 09/04/2020 SUMMARY The fourth Shady Grove Sector Plan Minor Master Plan Amendment work session will focus on: 1. Key Plan area transportation comments and recommendations; 2. Comments received from the public, stakeholders and the Planning Board in previous work sessions; and 3. Suggested changes for the Planning Board’s consideration. On December 5, 2019, staff presented the Plan’s key preliminary transportation recommendations to the Planning Board. The Board largely supported the preliminary recommendations, including enhancements to Crabbs Branch Way, general Vision Zero safety recommendations, and the removal of the MD 355 and Gude Drive interchange from the Master Plan of Highways and Transitways. During the Board’s review of the preliminary recommendations in December 2019, the Planning Board posed transportation-related questions regarding the
    [Show full text]
  • Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority (WMATA)
    Description of document: Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority (WMATA) memoranda from the Deputy General Manager of Administration and Chief Financial Officer (DGMA/CFO) to the General Manager and Chief Executive Officer (GM/CEO), January 1, 2012 - March 31, 2012 Released date: 23-May-2014 Posted date: 23-June-2014 Source of document: Office of General Counsel PARP Administrator Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority 600 Fifth Street, NW Washington, D.C. 20001 The governmentattic.org web site (“the site”) is noncommercial and free to the public. The site and materials made available on the site, such as this file, are for reference only. The governmentattic.org web site and its principals have made every effort to make this information as complete and as accurate as possible, however, there may be mistakes and omissions, both typographical and in content. The governmentattic.org web site and its principals shall have neither liability nor responsibility to any person or entity with respect to any loss or damage caused, or alleged to have been caused, directly or indirectly, by the information provided on the governmentattic.org web site or in this file. The public records published on the site were obtained from government agencies using proper legal channels. Each document is identified as to the source. Any concerns about the contents of the site should be directed to the agency originating the document in question. GovernmentAttic.org is not responsible for the contents of documents published on the website. May 23, 2014 Re: PARP Request No. 12-0163 This is in response to your request for a copy of each Memorandum from the Deputy General Manager of Administration and Chief Financial Officer (DGMA/CFO) to the General Manager and Chief Executive Officer (GM/CEO) during January 1, 2012 - March 31, 2012.
    [Show full text]
  • Metrorail Station Access & Capacity Study (2008)
    METRORAIL STATION ACCESS & CAPACITY STUDY Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority Final Report April 2008 METRORAIL STATION ACCESS & CAPACITY STUDY CONTENTS Executive Summary....................................................................................................................................................1 Background..............................................................................................................................................................1 Findings....................................................................................................................................................................1 Ridership Trends ................................................................................................................................................2 Station Trends .....................................................................................................................................................4 Conclusion ...............................................................................................................................................................6 Section 1 Study Purpose and Approach...........................................................................................................7 1.1 Background ...................................................................................................................................................8 1.2 Regional Growth and Development........................................................................................................10
    [Show full text]
  • A Comparative Study of Bangkok's Mass Rapid Transit System
    Project Number: 48-JFZ-BKST A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF BANGKOK'S MASS RAPID TRANSIT SYSTEM An Interactive Qualifying Project Report submitted to the Faculty of WORCESTER POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of Bachelor of Science By Pitchaya Lekeagkarat Vacharaporn Paradorn Krisnapong Uampornvanich Date: March 1, 2001 Approved: Professor John F. Zeugner AUTHORSHIP PAGE This project was entirely a group effort. All three members equally contributed in the research, data gathering, analysis and final write-up. Page missing or incorrectly numbered in original IQP/MQP SCANNING PROJECT George C. Gordon Library WORCESTER POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This project examines the feasibility of the implementation of the Bangkok Mass Transit System (BTS) in Thailand in term of applicability, history organizational structure, management, technology, financial situation, and social impact. Moreover, this project includes a comparison among BTS and three other U.S. transit systems; Metro D.C., Miami Dade Transit, and San Francisco BART. The project begins with a background history of the development of mass rapid transit in Bangkok. The government of Thailand has concerned about the traffic crisis in Bangkok, the capital of Thailand, for at least thirty years. The best solution to the critical traffic problem with the minimum environmental impact is the construction of a mass rapid transit system. The objective of the mass rapid transit is to provide the people of Bangkok with a fast, clean, affordable
    [Show full text]
  • Mobility Assessment Report
    Sector Plan DRAFT mobility assessment report Abstract This report documents how well the County is meeting its goals for mobility of cars, cyclists, pedestrians, and transit, by measuring and analyzing historical, current, and future traffic congestion data and trends. Source of Copies The Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission 8787 Georgia Avenue Silver Spring, MD 20910 Also available at www.MontgomeryPlanning.org/transportation Staff Draft Prepared by the Montgomery County Planning Department April 2014 Contents Introduction 1 Highlights 2 Total Vehicle Miles Traveled Intersections Roadways Pedestrians and Bicyclists Ride On Metrobus Metrorail Travel Trends 4 National, State, and Local Vehicle Miles Traveled 4 InterCounty Connector (MD 200) Effects on Local Roads 4 Congested Intersections 6 Most Congested Intersections by CLV 8 Other Congested Intersections 18 Intersection Exceeding Policy Area Congestion Standards 23 Congested Roadways 24 Non-Auto Travel Trends 38 Pedestrian and Bicycling Analysis 38 Transit Analysis 43 Ride On Bus WMATA Metrobus WMATA Metrorail References 49 Maps Map 1 Ten Most Congested Intersections 7 Map 2 Intersections Exceeding LATR Standard 23 Map 3 Roadway Analysis Coverage with Policy Areas 25 Map 4 Pedestrian Activity 39 Map 5 Bike Count Locations 40 Map 6 Total Bike Split Movement Analysis 41 Map 7 Average Daily Ridership: Ride On Bus 43 Map 8 Average Peak Headways: Ride On Bus 44 Map 9 Metrobus Daily Revenue Trips 45 Map 10 Metrobus Daily Headways 46 Map 11 Metrobus Ridership per Revenue
    [Show full text]
  • Fy 2027 Alexandria Transit Company (Dash) Transit Development Plan
    FY 2022 – FY 2027 ALEXANDRIA TRANSIT COMPANY (DASH) TRANSIT DEVELOPMENT PLAN ADOPTED BY THE ATC BOARD OF DIRECTORS ON MAY 12, 2021 703.746.DASH (3274) DASHBUS.COM 3000 BUSINESS CENTER DR, ALEXANDRIA TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 / Executive Summary ............................................................................................................................. 1 1.1 / System Performance ..................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 / FY 2022 Service & Fare Change Recommendations ..................................................................... 2 1.4 / ATC Capital Program Summary .................................................................................................... 4 2.0 / TDP Background ................................................................................................................................... 5 2.1 / Purpose & Format ......................................................................................................................... 5 2.2 / Process & Timeline ........................................................................................................................ 5 2.3 / Alexandria Transit Vision Plan ...................................................................................................... 6 3.0 / System Summary ................................................................................................................................. 8 3.1 / Service Area .................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • FTA WMATA Metrorail Safety Oversight Inspection Reports, August 2016
    Inspection Form Form FTA-IR-1 United States Department of Transportation FOIA Exemption: All (b)(6) Federal Transit Administration Agency/Department Information YYYY MM DD Inspection Date Report Number 20160804-WMATA-TW-1 2016 08 04 Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Rail Agency Rail Agency Name RTTO Sub- Department Authority Department Name Email Office Phone Mobile Phone Rail Agency Department Contact Information Inspection Location Surge #6 Takoma and Silver Spring Station Platforms Inspection Summary Inspection Activity # 1 2 3 4 5 6 Activity Code OPS – GEN – OBS Inspection Units 1 Inspection Subunits 2 Defects (Number) 0 Recommended Finding No Remedial Action Required No Recommended Reinspection No Activity Summaries Platform Inspection at Takoma and Silver Spring Inspection Activity # 1 Inspection Subject Activity Code OPS GEN OBS Stations Job Briefing Accompanied Out Brief 1000 - Outside Employee No No Time No Inspector? Conducted 1400 Shift Name/Title Related Reports Related CAPS / Findings Ref Rule or SOP Standard Other / Title Checklist Reference Related Rules, SOPs, Standards, or Other Main RTA FTA Yard Station OCC At-grade Tunnel Elevated N/A Track Facility Office Inspection Location Track Type X X From To Red Line Track Chain Marker Takoma Station Silver Spring Station Line(s) B07-B08 Number and/or Station(s) Head Car Number Number of Cars Vehicles Equipment Inspector in Charge - Signature Digitally signed by TERRELL A WILLIAMS Date DN: c=US, o=U.S. Government, ou=DOT Headquarters, ou=FTAHQ, 8/04/2016 TERRELL A WILLIAMS cn=TERRELL A WILLIAMS Date: 2016.08.08 14:41:35 -04'00' Inspector in Charge – Name Inspection Team Terrell Williams Terrell Williams Form FTA-IR-1 Version date: 1/19/16 Form FTA-IR-1 United States Department of Transportation Federal Transit Administration FWSO Inspectors inspected SafeTrack operations at the Takoma and Silver Spring 0 station platforms during this fourth day of Surge #6 which is a continuous single tracking segment between the stations.
    [Show full text]
  • Newsletters Is Distributed by Email Only to Paid Members
    Note: The complete Newsletters is distributed by email only to paid members. Newsletter No. 10, 2018 October 2018 Website: http://www.crystalcitycivic.org/ Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/crystalcitycivic/ Arlington to Study Dockless Bikeshare Bikes, Scooters Inside this Issue: Civic Association Issues Pedestrians Watch Your Back (Editorial) Next CCCA Meetings ART Bus 20th Anniversary Uber/Lyft Parking Lot on S. Eads Street Arlington Public Library’s New Logo New County Resident Ombudsman Crystal City Development and Planning Issues NOVA’s First African-American Female Battalion Chief (Editorial) Crystal City Development Paralyzed Arlington Gauging Community Satisfaction (Editorial) Save the Full 18th Street Park Where to place the Arlington County car Decal? Voting Precinct 006 Finds a Home! Arlington Schools Make a Connection that Counts Crystal Drive two-way conversion Permanent Drug Take-Back Boxes Clark Street demolition update Arlington Tourism Revenue Hits Record $3.3B in 2017 ART 43 schedule changes effective Sept. 30 USS Arlington Sails on Eve of 9/11 Anniversary Amazon's goal Police Community Outreach Teams Quarterly Meetings Jeff Bezos on HQ2 Save the Date: Opioids Epidemic Community Forum Update on VRE Station (Editorial) – Decision on New VRE Location Other News: Painted Bikes and Twirlers National Project Journey Update Café Italia Reincarnated: Federico Ristorante New Dulles facial recognition system Metro contracting team for Potomac Yard station Arlington Neighborhood Village October Events New Pentagon Fashion Center
    [Show full text]