DOCSLIB.ORG

Aliran Monthly : Vol.25(8) Page 1 PP3739/12/2005 ISSN 0127

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Aliran Monthly : Vol.25(8) Page 1 PP3739/12/2005 ISSN 0127 PP3739/12/2005 ISSN 0127 - 5127 / RM4.00 / 2005:Vol.25No.8 Aliran Monthly : Vol.25(8) Page 1 COVER STORY A Perspective on National Unity Memorandum presented by Aliran to the Parliamentary Select Committee on National Unity Datuk Dr Maximus Ongkili: Chairman, Parliamentary Select Committee on National Unity n behalf of Aliran OO Kesedaran Negara, we OOO wish to thank the Select Committee for inviting us to make a presentation today. Even so, we’re uncertain how the views of a socially conscious, proudly dissenting, reform-ori- ented NGO – sometimes casti- gated for being ‘anti-government’ by Barisan Nasional politicians – form a critical and balanced ap- That is true no matter how gravely will be received by a Select Com- proach to the subject of ‘national we speak of the tasks of nation mittee coming from a Parliament unity’. building, no matter how fre- that is over 90 per cent Barisan quently we talk of stability, har- Nasional. No fixed meaning mony and goodwill. But we are here nonetheless be- Let’s begin by admitting the obvi- As an ideal the desirability of ‘na- cause we have things to say ous. ‘National unity’ defies sim- tional unity’ seems incontestable which others may not raise. And, ple and stable definition. Discur- for a nation that is so often de- with due respect to other represen- sively, ‘national unity’ has no scribed as being deeply divided tations to this Select Committee, fixed meaning that all Malaysians along ethnic lines. we mean to offer ‘contrarian’ can accept without debate or disa- views that we believe should in- greement. Yet, we are more likely to be able Aliran Monthly : Vol.25(8) Page 2 EDITOR'S NOTE We all desire national unity - but what exactly is it? Our cover story says that it must be based on a cel- CONTENTS ebration of our diversity, commitment to pluralism, respect for democracy, dedication to justice and soli- darity with all in need. COVER STORY ••• A Perspective On National Unity 222 G Lim argues that that if we are to have a new agenda ••• Debating An Equitable Malaysia 777 for Malaysia, let us first have a debate in which eve- ryone can participate. His article takes off from last FEATURES month’s AM cover story and ties in with the theme of national unity based on justice, equity, and par- ••• UMNO Has Failed The Poor Malays 111111 ticipatory democracy. ••• Pearl Lost In The Garbage And Jerebu 131313 Imagine, Mahathir, who governed using unjust laws ••• The API Nightmare 151515 such as the ISA and POPO, speaking at Sukaham’s ••• POPO - The Other ISA 161616 human rights day celebration! He criticised US-UK ••• Why Did The Chicken Cross actions in Iraq but was muted on his dismal domes- tic human rights record. We carry a protest by 30 The Border? 191919 NGOs while P Ramakrishnan reminds us of how ••• Merdeka! Merdeka! Merdeka! 242424 the former premier trampled on human rights dur- ••• You Are Not Serious, Suhakam! 262626 ing his tenure. Will Mahathir ever acknowledge - let ••• Remember How You Trampled On alone apologise for - these violations? John Hilley, Human Rights, Tun Mahathir? 282828 after discussing the question of leaders apologising ••• Political Contrition 303030 for past actions, says that Mahathir’s stand on Iraq would be more convincing should he one day call ••• Orang Asli Land Rights Upheld 404040 for a repeal of the ISA and justice for those who suf- fered during his tenure. That would be the day! REGULARS ••• LettersLettersLetters 33 Our back cover story by Colin Nicholas reports on the stunning Court of Appeal decision upholding OTHERSOTHERSOTHERS Orang Asli land rights. Now the Orang Asli are look- ing for the former DG of the Department of Orang ••• Subscription Form 232323 Asli Affairs to make good on his promise that they could kick him on the butt if they won their case. Angeline Loh, in another story, reminds us that Penangites are living in blissful ignorance amidst the rubbish and smog. Enjoy our centre pages, where Shakila Manan writes on “Hen or Rooster?”, a chil- Published by dren’s theatre performance with a difference. Aliran Kesedaran Negara (ALIRAN) 103, Medan Penaga, 11600 Jelutong, ALIRANALIRANALIRAN is a Reform Movement dedicated to Penang, Malaysia. Justice, Freedom & Solidarity and listed on the Tel : (04) 658 5251 Fax : (04) 658 5197 roster of the Economic and Social Council of the United Nations. Founded in 1977, Aliran welcomes Homepage : http://www.aliran.com all Malaysians above 21 to be members. Contact the Hon. Secretary or visit our webpage. Printed by Percetakan Tujuh Lapan Enam Sdn. Bhd. No. 16, Lengkangan Brunei, 55100 Pudu, Kuala Lumpur. Aliran Monthly : Vol.25(8) Page 3 to capture the reality of ‘national when they find it profitable to Of course, each of these meanings unity’ by remembering the signs warn that ours is a fragile unity of ‘national unity’ may be differ- of its absence – that is, serious that can be shattered at a mo- ently interpreted, even chal- strife, violent conflicts, persistent ment’s notice. lenged. Still, we can highlight cer- crises and relentless turmoil. tain aspects of each of these mean- Hence, the same politicians see no ings in order to render it compre- Why do we say all this at the out- problem in congratulating them- hensible, acceptable and practica- set? It is not because we are com- selves on how well they foster ble. placent about the state of our so- muhibbah while they keep harking ciety. We aren’t. to ‘May 13’ or show during elec- Here, we give one example directly tion campaigns horrifying films of while we will indirectly refer to But we know that ‘national Bosnia-Herzegovina, Rwanda, the others later. unity’, as a goal, is elusive and eas- Afghanistan under the Taliban, ily subjected to manipulation. We ‘September 11’, and so on. Celebration know that ‘national unity’, re- of Diversity garded to be under threat, is readily Actually, ordinary Malaysians used to justify unconscionable aren’t stupid. They realise that practices by those in power. those who most loudly shout ‘na- tional unity’ are often those who End schizophrenia undermine it most callously. and hypocrisy! Hence, to the distinguished mem- We’re regularly reminded that bers of this Select Committee our ‘national unity’ is critical. Some first point about ‘national unity’ people think that that will bring is this: Tell the politicians, not least foreign tourists and global inves- those of the Barisan Nasional, to tors to us. finish with this kind of hypocrisy. Tell them honestly and bluntly to We’d like to think that ‘national stop mixing self-praise with ill- unity’ is more than that. ‘National disguised threats. unity’ should allow us to live in peace among ourselves, permit us A national Putrajaya: How does this opulence to prosper and enable us to leave unity of substance contribute to national unity? something valuable to future gen- erations. Our second point is: ‘National Partly by accident and partly by unity’, like other objectives and achievement, we’ve kept our cul- Yet, we find that we are almost policies that impact upon social tural diversity intact. Today no schizophrenic over ‘national life, begins as an empty vessel that one wants to talk of assimilation. unity’. Or, rather, our politicians needs filling. Just what do we fill We’re aware of the range of our – with few and notable exceptions it with? cultural heritage. However, we – are schizophrenic in this regard. can’t simply resign ourselves to We in Aliran propose that ‘na- living with our differences. On the one hand, they love to pose tional unity’ be invested with the as our natural custodians of ‘na- following substance and mean- Truly, we must celebrate our cul- tional unity’. They pat themselves ings: tural diversity. Only then can we on the back whenever they find it set aside the old and silly lament useful to proclaim that we are har- • Celebration of our diversity that we are not ‘homogenous’ – monious and stable. • Commitment to pluralism as if only cultural drabness can • Respect for democracy save us. Only thus will we stop On the other hand, it is second • Dedication to justice believing that Malaysians have no habit with them to threaten us • Solidarity with all in need. common and binding values. Aliran Monthly : Vol.25(8) Page 4 Only a proactive celebration of our the ethnic conflicts that plagued Over the past two decades, many diversity can prevent our ethnic, our immediate post-Merdeka era. of our communities have been dis- cultural, religious and linguistic We are not submerged in the re- possessed of land, resources and variations from becoming gional confrontations of post-co- customary rights. They have suf- unbridgeable schisms to be lonial Southeast Asia. fered ecological collapse and en- preyed upon by unscrupulous vironmental degradation. politicians. If anything, we’ve been living in times of rapid development, late In whose name? Across the world, we in fact mar- industrialisation and intensifying ket our cultures and heritage as integration with the global In the name of development, poor ‘tourism products’. Should we economy. For us, this experience and meek communities have been then leave it only to the foreign tour- has been generally happier than uprooted and displaced. In the ist to find our diversity quaint? for many others. name of foreign investment, the erosion, denial and repression of Across the globe, the government But maybe our relative fortune has the rights of labour to organise has promoted the Multimedia Su- blinded us to an important lesson and unionise has been sanc- per Corridor, among other things, from history.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • THE UNREALIZED MAHATHIR-ANWAR TRANSITIONS Social Divides and Political Consequences
    THE UNREALIZED MAHATHIR-ANWAR TRANSITIONS Social Divides and Political Consequences Khoo Boo Teik TRENDS IN SOUTHEAST ASIA ISSN 0219-3213 TRS15/21s ISSUE ISBN 978-981-5011-00-5 30 Heng Mui Keng Terrace 15 Singapore 119614 http://bookshop.iseas.edu.sg 9 7 8 9 8 1 5 0 1 1 0 0 5 2021 21-J07781 00 Trends_2021-15 cover.indd 1 8/7/21 12:26 PM TRENDS IN SOUTHEAST ASIA 21-J07781 01 Trends_2021-15.indd 1 9/7/21 8:37 AM The ISEAS – Yusof Ishak Institute (formerly Institute of Southeast Asian Studies) is an autonomous organization established in 1968. It is a regional centre dedicated to the study of socio-political, security, and economic trends and developments in Southeast Asia and its wider geostrategic and economic environment. The Institute’s research programmes are grouped under Regional Economic Studies (RES), Regional Strategic and Political Studies (RSPS), and Regional Social and Cultural Studies (RSCS). The Institute is also home to the ASEAN Studies Centre (ASC), the Singapore APEC Study Centre and the Temasek History Research Centre (THRC). ISEAS Publishing, an established academic press, has issued more than 2,000 books and journals. It is the largest scholarly publisher of research about Southeast Asia from within the region. ISEAS Publishing works with many other academic and trade publishers and distributors to disseminate important research and analyses from and about Southeast Asia to the rest of the world. 21-J07781 01 Trends_2021-15.indd 2 9/7/21 8:37 AM THE UNREALIZED MAHATHIR-ANWAR TRANSITIONS Social Divides and Political Consequences Khoo Boo Teik ISSUE 15 2021 21-J07781 01 Trends_2021-15.indd 3 9/7/21 8:37 AM Published by: ISEAS Publishing 30 Heng Mui Keng Terrace Singapore 119614 [email protected] http://bookshop.iseas.edu.sg © 2021 ISEAS – Yusof Ishak Institute, Singapore All rights reserved.
    [Show full text]
  • Malaysia: the 2020 Putsch for Malay Islam Supremacy James Chin School of Social Sciences, University of Tasmania
    Malaysia: the 2020 putsch for Malay Islam supremacy James Chin School of Social Sciences, University of Tasmania ABSTRACT Many people were surprised by the sudden fall of Mahathir Mohamad and the Pakatan Harapan (PH) government on 21 February 2020, barely two years after winning the historic May 2018 general elections. This article argues that the fall was largely due to the following factors: the ideology of Ketuanan Melayu Islam (Malay Islam Supremacy); the Mahathir-Anwar dispute; Mahathir’s own role in trying to reduce the role of the non-Malays in the government; and the manufactured fear among the Malay polity that the Malays and Islam were under threat. It concludes that the majority of the Malay population, and the Malay establishment, are not ready to share political power with the non- Malays. Introduction Many people were shocked when the Barisan National (BN or National Front) govern- ment lost its majority in the May 2018 general elections. After all, BN had been in power since independence in 1957 and the Federation of Malaysia was generally regarded as a stable, one-party regime. What was even more remarkable was that the person responsible for Malaysia’s first regime change, Mahathir Mohammad, was also Malaysia’s erstwhile longest serving prime minister. He had headed the BN from 1981 to 2003 and was widely regarded as Malaysia’s strongman. In 2017, he assumed leader- ship of the then-opposition Pakatan Harapan (PH or Alliance of Hope) coalition and led the coalition to victory on 9 May 2018. He is remarkable as well for the fact that he became, at the age of 93, the world’s oldest elected leader.1 The was great hope that Malaysia would join the global club of democracy but less than two years on, the PH government fell apart on 21 February 2020.
    [Show full text]
  • Research Commons at The
    http://waikato.researchgateway.ac.nz/ Research Commons at the University of Waikato Copyright Statement: The digital copy of this thesis is protected by the Copyright Act 1994 (New Zealand). The thesis may be consulted by you, provided you comply with the provisions of the Act and the following conditions of use: Any use you make of these documents or images must be for research or private study purposes only, and you may not make them available to any other person. Authors control the copyright of their thesis. You will recognise the author’s right to be identified as the author of the thesis, and due acknowledgement will be made to the author where appropriate. You will obtain the author’s permission before publishing any material from the thesis. The Defence of Ethnic Identity in Malaysia A thesis submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in International Relations and Security Studies at The University of Waikato by Melanie Jones-Leaning The University of Waikato 2010 Abstract The changing dynamics of interstate conflict in the post-Cold War environment led scholars to debate the relevance of established security theory. While traditionalists maintained that the state-centric theory should retain its primacy, others argued for a security agenda, not only broadened or widened to include other sectors, but one deepened or extended to include the individual and larger societal groupings as referent objects of security. In the 1990s, the Copenhagen Peace Research Institute developed a reformulated and expanded security agenda which recognized five dimensions of security – political, military, economic, environmental and societal.
    [Show full text]
  • An Analysis of the Underlying Factors That Affected Malaysia-Singapore Relations During the Mahathir Era: Discords and Continuity
    An Analysis of the Underlying Factors That Affected Malaysia-Singapore Relations During the Mahathir Era: Discords and Continuity Rusdi Omar Thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Discipline of Politics and International Studies School of History and Politics Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences The University of Adelaide May 2014 TABLE OF CONTENTS TITLE PAGE TABLE OF CONTENTS i ABSTRACT v DECLARATION vi ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS vii ABBREVIATIONS/ACRONYMS ix GLOSSARY xii 1 INTRODUCTION 1 1.1. Introductory Background 1 1.2. Statement of the Problem 3 1.3. Research Aims and Objectives 5 1.4. Scope and Limitation 6 1.5. Literature Review 7 1.6. Theoretical/ Conceptual Framework 17 1.7. Research Methodology 25 1.8. Significance of Study 26 1.9. Thesis Organization 27 2 HISTORICAL BACKGROUND OF MALAYSIA-SINGAPORE RELATIONS 30 2.1. Introduction 30 2.2. The Historical Background of Malaysia 32 2.3. The Historical Background of Singapore 34 2.4. The Period of British Colonial Rule 38 i 2.4.1. Malayan Union 40 2.4.2. Federation of Malaya 43 2.4.3. Independence for Malaya 45 2.4.4. Autonomy for Singapore 48 2.5. Singapore’s Inclusion in the Malaysian Federation (1963-1965) 51 2.6. The Period after Singapore’s Separation from Malaysia 60 2.6.1. Tunku Abdul Rahman’s Era 63 2.6.2 Tun Abdul Razak’s Era 68 2.6.3. Tun Hussein Onn’s Era 76 2.7. Conclusion 81 3 CONTENTIOUS ISSUES IN MALAYSIA-SINGAPORE RELATIONS 83 3.1. Introduction to the Issues Affecting Relations Between Malaysia and Singapore 83 3.2.
    [Show full text]
  • No. 266 Malaysia's Past Successes and Uncertain Future: Graduating
    The RSIS Working Paper series presents papers in a preliminary form and serves to stimulate comment and discussion. The views expressed in this publication are entirely those of the author(s), and do not represent the official position of RSIS. If you have any comments, please send them to [email protected]. Unsubscribing If you no longer want to receive RSIS Working Papers, please click on “Unsubscribe” to be removed from the list. No. 266 Malaysia’s Past Successes and Uncertain Future: Graduating from the Middle or Caught in the Middle? Hooi Hooi Lean and Russell Smyth S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies Singapore 6 January 2014 About RSIS The S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies (RSIS) was established in January 2007 as an autonomous School within the Nanyang Technological University. Known earlier as the Institute of Defence and Strategic Studies when it was established in July 1996, RSIS‟ mission is to be a leading research and graduate teaching institution in strategic and international affairs in the Asia Pacific. To accomplish this mission, it will: Provide a rigorous professional graduate education with a strong practical emphasis, Conduct policy-relevant research in defence, national security, international relations, strategic studies and diplomacy, Foster a global network of like-minded professional schools. GRADUATE EDUCATION IN INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS RSIS offers a challenging graduate education in international affairs, taught by an international faculty of leading thinkers and practitioners. The Master of Science (MSc) degree programmes in Strategic Studies, International Relations, Asian Studies, and International Political Economy are distinguished by their focus on the Asia Pacific, the professional practice of international affairs, and the cultivation of academic depth.
    [Show full text]
  • Aliran Monthly : Vol.26(10) Page 1 PP3739/12/2006 ISSN 0127
    PP3739/12/2006 ISSN 0127 - 5127 / RM4.00 / 2006:Vol.26No.10 Aliran Monthly : Vol.26(10) Page 1 COVER STORY Lost on the way to 2020 A commentary on the Umno General Assembly 2006 by Khoo Boo Teik hose who had their eyes, TT ears, heads, and hearts TTT assailed by the live tele- cast of the Umno General Assembly last month may be driven to find some balm in the following words: Today we have Malays and Bumiputera as heads of departments, scientists, actuaries, nuclear physi- cists, surgeons, experts in the fields of medicine and aviation, bankers and corporate leaders. In fact, some are already managers of major conglome- rates worth billions of ringgit and able to acquire bigger companies in the open market or participate in mergers and acquisitions which are complex and sophisticated. Alien pride Thus spoke Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad with undisguised pride in Malay attainments after a lifetime’s anxiety that to be Malay was to be backward. Yet his anxiety was never fully assuaged. He left office warning of a ‘second Malay dilemma’, downcast at the thought that he and the Malays had let each other down. But his sense of pride, even though it came before the fall in July 1997, must have been alien to the delegates who made up Aliran Monthly : Vol.26(10) Page 2 EDITOR'S NOTE In the lead story, Khoo Boo Teik comments on how UMNO got lost on the way to 2020. CONTENTS If the goal is 100% national unity, the UMNO of 2006 has taken us 30% forward, 70% back- COVER STORY ward.
    [Show full text]
  • Background Paper
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by eDoc.VifaPol Background Paper No. 14 / September 2011 Malaysia’s New Economic Model Is the Malaysian government serious about economic liberalisation? Wan Saiful Wan Jan In March 2010, the Prime Minister of Malaysia launched the first part of Malaysia’s “New Economic Model” (NEM). It calls for a more liberalised economy and reduced government in- tervention. It also proposes a radical shift from the heavily pro-Malay affirmative action prac- tices that have been in place since the 1970s to a more inclusive and race-blind system. How- ever, when the final part of the NEM was published in December 2010, the initial radicalism and boldness seem to have been watered down following pressure from Malay nationalists. Pro-Malay agenda reappeared. Several actions by the government indicated that they are not as committed to economic liberalisation as they claimed to be when the NEM was first an- nounced. Nevertheless, overall, the NEM still promises significant steps towards the right di- rection. This paper provides an explanation of the NEM and a critical assessment of the poli- tics around it. Executive Summary Multi-ethnic Malaysia, politically dominated by its Malay majority, has been seeking to reduce inter- and intra-ethnic income-disparities for decades. The "New Economic Policy" (NEP), intro- duced in 1971, led to pro-Malay affirmative action policies, which are still in place today. In terms of economic development, Malaysia has made strides and growth has been decent. But continuous government intervention in the economy sees the country now stuck in a middle income trap.
    [Show full text]
  • Wawasan 2020: at the End of the Day Even Art Is Not Important
    Y A O S O U C H O U Wawasan 2020: At the End of the Day Even Art is Not Important l d ı v a n_8 The attempt was as banal as it was futile: another effort by the Malaysian authorities to impose censorship upon an artist. Over several decades, Ahmad Fuad Osman’s art practice has dealt with ethnic identity, national memory and particularly, government abuse of power. Acclaimed as one of the most prominent artists working in Malaysia today, his engaging and sophisticated art has been exhibited recently at the 2016 Singapore Biennale: An Atlas of Mirrors and the 2019 Sharjah Biennial: Leaving the Echo Chamber. Malaysia was ready to acknowledge the achievements of one of its proud sons when the Balai Seni Negara (National Art Gallery of Malaysia) gave him a mid-career exhibition in October 2019, which he ironically titled At the End of the Day Even Art is Not Important (1990-2019). The exhibition consisted of a variety of media—painting, installation and photography, selected and approved by the Bali. On 21 January, 2020, three months into the exhibition, Osman was informed that four of his works would be withdrawn following a complaint from a Gallery Board member. The works in question were Untitled (2012), posters of Anwar Ibrahim with a black eye, a reference to his assault by the Inspector General of Police while in detention before his sodomy trial in 1988; Dreaming of Being A Somebody Afraid of Being A Nobody (2019), portraits of Mohamed Azmin, Dr. Mahathir bin Mohamad and Anwar Ibrahim, key figures in the struggle for power that led to the collapse of the reformist government that came to power after the 2018 general election; Imitating the Mountain (2004), a painting of a naked man lying on his back against the backdrop of a mountain, and Mak Bapak Borek, Anak Cucu Cicit Pun Rintik (2015-18), an installation of overweight white ceramic pigs sited before a gold-plated rock.
    [Show full text]
  • The Origins and Evolution of Ethnocracy in Malaysia
    Volume 7 | Issue 47 | Number 4 | Article ID 3259 | Nov 16, 2009 The Asia-Pacific Journal | Japan Focus The Origins and Evolution of Ethnocracy in Malaysia Geoff Wade The Origins and Evolution of1957 Constitution has been used as a basis for Ethnocracy in Malaysia all manner of exclusionist and discriminatory policies which have become increasingly Geoff Wade socially encompassing, producing a situation where non-Malay members of Malaysian 1. Introduction society feel themselves excluded and thereby ignored in terms of access to “public” facilities, How is it that today in the diverse, multi-ethnic funds and opportunities. The March 2008 polity of Malaysia (where government figures election results were in part a reflection of give a population breakdown of 65%sentiments over this socially inequitable Bumiputra, 26% Chinese and 8% Indian), a situation. single ethnic group completely controls - and occupies virtually all positions in - the judiciary, 2. The History of Ethnocracy in public administrative organs, the police, the Malaya/Malaysia from 1942 armed forces and increasingly the universities? While Malays constitute a majority of the Let us begin the account with 1942, and population of this nation, their presence in all proceed to earlier times later in the paper. these spheres of power far exceeds their ratio Even from the beginning of the Japanese within the general population. How did this invasion and occupation of Malaya and situation emerge and how has it evolved? Singapore over the period 1941-45, it was obvious to the British and others that there would need to be a real reassessment of the British role in the peninsula and Borneo post- war.
    [Show full text]
  • In Malaysia: Pakatan Rakyat’S Mobilization of Dissent Between Reformasi and the Tsunami
    Networks in Pursuit of a “Two-Coalition System” in Malaysia: Pakatan Rakyat’s Mobilization of Dissent between Reformasi and the Tsunami Khoo Boo Teik* In Malaysia’s 12th general election, in March 2008, three opposition parties col- lectively cracked the hegemony of the ruling coalition, Barisan Nasional (BN, or National Front). As the opposition parties formed a coalition called Pakatan Rakyat (PR, or People’s Alliance), a two-coalition system appeared to have taken shape. This essay analyzes how PR reached that electoral outcome by moving from “imagin ing” to “realizing” dissent. Imagining and realizing dissent are not treated as disparate acts here but as tasks borne by qualitatively different networks that helped PR to overcome its structural, organizational, and resource disadvantages. The first networks considered are the cyber-networks that used ICT-sited or -enabled links to construct an alternative media linking PR’s organizers and sup- porters in an imagined community of dissent. PR’s second type of network con- sisted of physical coalitions—groups and organizations that connected the PR parties with their allies in civil society and their supporters at large. Their common objective was to mobilize dissent for electoral contestation. Even after 2008, how- ever, PR was vulnerable to regime harassment and blandishments because it was missing a third type of network that would link party structures and social, com- munity, and civic associations. By analyzing PR’s networks, this essay offers a fresh perspective on the travails of building a two-coalition system. Keywords: Malaysia, 2008 general election, Pakatan Rakyat, cyber-networks, two-coalition system In Malaysia’s 12th general election, held on March 8, 2008, 49 percent of the electorate voted for the non-formalized opposition coalition—made up of Parti Keadilan Rakyat (PKR, or People’s Justice Party), Parti Islam (PAS, or Islamic Party), and Democratic Action Party (DAP)—and finally cracked the hegemonic hold of the ruling coalition, Barisan Nasional (BN, or National Front).
    [Show full text]
  • A Study of Issues During the 13 General Election
    Jurnal Komunikasi Malaysian Journal of Communication Jilid 33(2) 2017: 13-26 SPECIAL ARTICLES ON AGENDA SETTING Media Agenda and Public Agenda: A Study of Issues during the 13th General Election AINI MAZNINA A. MANAF International Islamic University Malaysia [email protected] MALIA TAIBI Universiti Malaysia Sarawak [email protected] KAMARUZZAMAN ABDUL MANAN International Islamic University Malaysia [email protected] ABSTRACT Media might play an important role in public’s voting decision. Even so, it is unknown whether the media agenda counterpart public agenda with regard to the level of importance of the issues covered in the media. This study examined the issues of concern by the Malaysian mainstream newspapers, as well as the issues of concern by the public during the 13th General Election (GE 13). In particular, this study explored the relationship between media and public agenda; as well as the relationship between Malay language newspaper agenda and the Malay public agenda. Content analysis and survey were performed to fulfil these objectives. The findings showed that the media has different agenda from the public. In addition, the Malay newspaper and public of the same ethnic group do not share similar agenda of issues. On top of that, the findings showed the priority of issues perceived by media and public are different. While the public see national security as the most important issue of the country, media on the other hand, set religion and politics as the priority in their agenda. Keywords: Malay newspaper, media agenda, public agenda, issues, 13th General Election INTRODUCTION The results of 13th general election brought a new political scenario in Malaysia.
    [Show full text]
  • Fifty Years of Malaysia's New Economic Policy: Three Chapters
    No. 2021 - 07 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fifty Years of Malaysia’s New Economic Policy: Three Chapters with No Conclusion Lee Hwok Aun ISEAS - Yusof Ishak Institute, Singapore July 2021 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Abstract The New Economic Policy (NEP) which focused on poverty reduction and social restructuring has transformed Malaysia since 1971. Pro-Bumiputera affirmative action was intensively pursued and has continuously faced pushback, with heightened debate at key junctures. The NEP was marred by gaps and omissions, notably its ambiguity on policy mechanisms and long- term implications, and inordinate emphasis on Bumiputera equity ownership. Broader discourses have imbibed these elements and tend to be more selective than systematic in policy critique. During the late 1980s, rousing deliberations on the successor to the NEP settled on a growth-oriented strategy that basically retained the NEP framework and extended ethnicity- driven compromises. Since 2010, notions of reform and alternatives to the NEP’s affirmative action programme have been propagated, which despite bold proclamations, again amount to partial and selective – not comprehensive – change. Affirmative action presently drifts along, with
    [Show full text]