DOCSLIB.ORG

510(K) SUBSTANTIAL EQUIVALENCE DETERMINATION DECISION SUMMARY ASSAY ONLY TEMPLATE

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
510(K) SUBSTANTIAL EQUIVALENCE DETERMINATION DECISION SUMMARY ASSAY ONLY TEMPLATE 510(k) SUBSTANTIAL EQUIVALENCE DETERMINATION DECISION SUMMARY ASSAY ONLY TEMPLATE A. 510(k) Number: k153596 B. Purpose for Submission: New Device C. Measurand: Oxcarbazepine Metabolite D. Type of Test: Homogenous enzyme immunoassay E. Applicant: ARK Diagnostics, Inc. F. Proprietary and Established Names: ARK Oxcarbazepine Metabolite Assay G. Regulatory Information: Product Classification Regulation Section Panel Code POX II 862.3645 - Neuroleptic drugs 91 - Toxicology radioreceptor assay test system. DLJ II 862.3200 - Clinical toxicology 91 - Toxicology calibrator LAS I, reserved 862.3280 - Clinical toxicology 91 - Toxicology control material H. Intended Use: 1. Intended use(s): See indications for use. 1 2. Indication(s) for use: The ARK Oxcarbazepine Metabolite Assay is a homogeneous enzyme immunoassay intended for the quantitative determination of Oxcarbazepine Metabolite in human serum on automated clinical chemistry analyzers. The measurements obtained are used in monitoring levels of Oxcarbazepine Metabolite to help ensure appropriate therapy. The ARK Oxcarbazepine Metabolite Calibrator is intended for use in calibration of the ARK Oxcarbazepine Metabolite Assay. The ARK Oxcarbazepine Metabolite Control is an assayed quality control material intended for use in quality control of the ARK Oxcarbazepine Metabolite Assay. 3. Special conditions for use statement(s): For prescription use only 4. Special instrument requirements: The assay was validated on the Beckman Coulter AU480 automated clinical chemistry analyzer. I. Device Description: The ARK Oxcarbazepine Metabolite Assay is a homogeneous immunoassay based on competition between drug in the specimen and Oxcarbazepine Metabolite labeled with the enzyme glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PDH) for binding to the antibody reagent. The ARK Oxcarbazepine Metabolite Assay consists of reagents R1 (anti-Oxcarbazepine Metabolite polyclonal antibody with substrate) and R2 (Oxcarbazepine Metabolite labeled with bacterial G6PDH enzyme). ARK Oxcarbazepine Metabolite Calibrator is comprised of a synthetic protein matrix and consists of a six-level set to calibrate the assay. The ARK Oxcarbazepine Metabolite Control is comprised of a synthetic protein matrix and consists of a three level set used for quality control of the assay. J. Substantial Equivalence Information: 1. Predicate device name(s): Emit 2000 Carbamazepine Assay, ARK Topiramate Calibrator, ARK Topiramate Control 2. Predicate 510(k) number(s): k010814 (assay); k083799 (calibrator and control) 2 3. Comparison with predicate: Assay Similarities Item Candidate Device (ARK Predicate Device (Emit Oxcarbazepine Assay) 2000 Carbamazepine Assay, k010814) Intended Use/Indications The ARK Oxcarbazepine The Emit® 2000 for Use Metabolite Assay is Carbamazepine Assay is a intended for the quantitative homogeneous enzyme determination of immunoassay intended for Oxcarbazepine Metabolite use in the quantitative in human serum on analysis of carbamazepine automated clinical in human serum or plasma. chemistry analyzers. The The results obtained helps measurements obtained are physicians individualize used in monitoring levels of dosage regimens. Oxcarbazepine Metabolite to help ensure appropriate therapy. Sample Type Serum Serum or plasma Methodology Homogenous enzyme Same immunoassay (EIA) Reagent components Two (2) reagent system: Two (2) reagent system: Anti- Oxcarbazepine Antibody/Substrate Metabolite Reagent (R1) containing Antibody/Substrate Reagent mouse monoclonal (R1) containing rabbit antibodies to polyclonal antibodies to carbamazepine, glucose-6- Oxcarbazepine Metabolite, phosphate, nicotinamide glucose-6- phosphate, adenine dinucleotide. nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide, bovine serum Enzyme Reagent (R2) albumin, sodium azide, and containing carbamazepine stabilizers labeled with bacterial G6PDH, buffer. Enzyme Reagent (R2) containing Oxcarbazepine Sodium azide, buffer, Metabolite labeled with preservatives, and bacterial G6PDH, buffer, stabilizers bovine serum albumin, sodium azide, and stabilizers Testing environment Routine clinical laboratory Same Reagent condition and Liquid, 2-8°C Same 3 Assay Similarities Item Candidate Device (ARK Predicate Device (Emit Oxcarbazepine Assay) 2000 Carbamazepine Assay, k010814) storage Assay Differences Item Candidate Device (ARK Predicate Device (ARK Oxcarbazepine Assay) Topiramate Assay, k083799) Analyte Oxcarbazepine metabolite Carbamazepine Controls: Similarities and Differences Item Candidate Device (ARK Predicate Device (ARK Oxcarbazepine Control) Topiramate Control; k083799) Intended Use/Indications The ARK Oxcarbazepine The ARK Topiramate for Use Metabolite control is an Control is intended for use assayed quality control in quality control of the material intended for use in ARK Topiramate Assay. quality control of the ARK Oxcarbazepine Metabolite Assay. Matrix Synthetic protein matrix Same (buffer, bovine serum albumin, preservatives) Levels 3 (LOW, MID, HIGH) Same Calibrators: Similarities and Differences Item Candidate Device (ARK Predicate Device (ARK Oxcarbazepine Topiramate Calibrator; Calibrator) k083799) Intended Use/Indications ARK Oxcarbazepine The ARK Topiramate for Use Metabolite Calibrator is Calibrator is intended for intended for use in use in calibration of the calibration of the ARK ARK Topiramate Assay. Oxcarbazepine Metabolite Assay. Matrix Synthetic protein matrix Same (buffer, bovine serum albumin, preservatives) Levels 6 Same 4 K. Standard/Guidance Document Referenced (if applicable): · Evaluation of Precision of Quantitative Measurement Procedures; Approved Guideline- Third Edition (EP05-A3) · Interference Testing in Clinical Chemistry; Approved Guideline - Second Edition (EP07-A2) · Measurement Procedure Comparison and Bias Estimation Using Patient Samples; Approved Guideline - Third Edition (EP09-A3) · Evaluation of the Linearity of Quantitative Measurement Procedures: A Statistical Approach; Approved Guideline (EP6-A) · Evaluation of Detection Capability for Clinical Laboratory Measurement Procedures; Approved Guideline - Second Edition (EP17-A2) L. Test Principle: The ARK Oxcarbazepine Metabolite Assay is a homogeneous immunoassay based on competition between drug in the specimen and Oxcarbazepine Metabolite labeled with the enzyme glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PDH) for binding to the antibody reagent. As the latter binds antibody, enzyme activity decreases. In the presence of drug from the specimen, enzyme activity increases and is directly proportional to the drug concentration. Active enzyme converts the coenzyme nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NAD) to NADH that is measured spectrophotometrically as a rate of change in absorbance. Endogenous serum G6PDH does not interfere with the results because the coenyzme NAD functions only with the bacterial enzyme used in the assay. M. Performance Characteristics (if/when applicable): 1. Analytical performance: a. Precision/Reproducibility: Data for the precision evaluation studies (total and within-laboratory precision) were collected on a single Beckman Coulter AU480 automated clinical chemistry analyzer. Each level of control and patient sample was assayed in quadruplicate twice a day over twenty non-consecutive days. A total of 160 determinations were made for each sample. One calibration was performed during this interval. A total of 6 samples (3 levels of human serum pooled specimens containing Oxcarbazepine Metabolite, and 3 levels of ARK Oxcarbazepine Metabolite controls) were used in the study. Mean oxcarbazepine metabolite, standard deviation (SD) and coefficients of variation (%CVs) were calculated for within-run, between-day, and total precision. 5 Sample N Mean Within Run Between Day Total ( g/mL) SD CV SD CV SD CV (%) (%) (%) ARK Control LOW 160 3.0 0.12 4.0 0.12 4.1 0.17 5.7 MID 160 10.1 0.37 3.6 0.33 3.2 0.48 4.8 HIGH 160 30.2 0.99 3.3 1.19 3.9 1.54 5.1 Human Serum LOW 160 3.1 0.12 3.9 0.12 4.0 0.17 5.5 MID 160 10.1 0.38 3.8 0.36 3.6 0.55 5.5 HIGH 160 30.4 1.10 3.6 1.11 3.7 1.55 5.1 b. Linearity/assay reportable range: Linearity was evaluated according to the CLSI EP6-A standard. A series of 8 concentrations (1.00, 3.00, 5.00, 10.00, 20.00, 30.00, 40.00, and 50.00 g/mL) in human serum were prepared by proportionally diluting a spiked high Oxcarbazepine Metabolite concentration serum sample pool with a negative serum pool. Two analytical runs of three replicates of each sample (6 replicates total) were measured for each concentration, and the mean of the measured concentration was compared to the theoretical expected Oxcarbazepine Metabolite concentrations based on the first order and second order linear regression analysis. The linear regression results using the sample concentrations listed above are: Analyzer Slope Intercept R2 AU480 1.0388 -0.0693 0.9994 This evaluation supports linearity within the claimed measuring range of 1.0 to 37.0 g/mL. Recovery An analytical recovery study was conducted on the Beckman Coulter AU480 to determine the effect of differing ratios of Oxcarbazepine Metabolite enantiomers (S- or R- enantiomer; ratio hereafter S:R) on recovery by spiking Oxcarbazepine Metabolite into human serum negative for Oxcarbazepine Metabolite. The results are as follows: 6 Mean Recovered Concentration ( g/mL) Theoretical S:R 1:1 S:R 4:1 S:R 9:1 S:R 19:1 Concentration ( g/mL) 1.0 0.77 0.93 0.98 0.95 4.0 3.78 3.92 3.94 3.86 8.0 7.47 8.18 8.16 7.82 15.0 14.10 15.80 14.91 15.42 20.0 19.03 21.69 19.81 21.02 35.0 33.74 34.71 33.52 36.16 45.0 42.89 46.88 44.63 49.46 c.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Appendix A: Potentially Inappropriate Prescriptions (Pips) for Older People (Modified from ‘STOPP/START 2’ O’Mahony Et Al 2014)
    Appendix A: Potentially Inappropriate Prescriptions (PIPs) for older people (modified from ‘STOPP/START 2’ O’Mahony et al 2014) Consider holding (or deprescribing - consult with patient): 1. Any drug prescribed without an evidence-based clinical indication 2. Any drug prescribed beyond the recommended duration, where well-defined 3. Any duplicate drug class (optimise monotherapy) Avoid hazardous combinations e.g.: 1. The Triple Whammy: NSAID + ACE/ARB + diuretic in all ≥ 65 year olds (NHS Scotland 2015) 2. Sick Day Rules drugs: Metformin or ACEi/ARB or a diuretic or NSAID in ≥ 65 year olds presenting with dehydration and/or acute kidney injury (AKI) (NHS Scotland 2015) 3. Anticholinergic Burden (ACB): Any additional medicine with anticholinergic properties when already on an Anticholinergic/antimuscarinic (listed overleaf) in > 65 year olds (risk of falls, increased anticholinergic toxicity: confusion, agitation, acute glaucoma, urinary retention, constipation). The following are known to contribute to the ACB: Amantadine Antidepressants, tricyclic: Amitriptyline, Clomipramine, Dosulepin, Doxepin, Imipramine, Nortriptyline, Trimipramine and SSRIs: Fluoxetine, Paroxetine Antihistamines, first generation (sedating): Clemastine, Chlorphenamine, Cyproheptadine, Diphenhydramine/-hydrinate, Hydroxyzine, Promethazine; also Cetirizine, Loratidine Antipsychotics: especially Clozapine, Fluphenazine, Haloperidol, Olanzepine, and phenothiazines e.g. Prochlorperazine, Trifluoperazine Baclofen Carbamazepine Disopyramide Loperamide Oxcarbazepine Pethidine
    [Show full text]
  • Inhibitory Effect of Eslicarbazepine Acetate and S-Licarbazepine on 2 Nav1.5 Channels
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.04.24.059188; this version posted August 14, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY 4.0 International license. 1 Inhibitory effect of eslicarbazepine acetate and S-licarbazepine on 2 Nav1.5 channels 3 Theresa K. Leslie1, Lotte Brückner 1, Sangeeta Chawla1,2, William J. Brackenbury1,2* 4 1Department of Biology, University of York, Heslington, York, YO10 5DD, UK 5 2York Biomedical Research Institute, University of York, Heslington, York, YO10 5DD, UK 6 * Correspondence: Dr William J. Brackenbury, Department of Biology and York Biomedical 7 Research Institute, University of York, Wentworth Way, Heslington, York YO10 5DD, UK. Email: 8 [email protected]. Tel: +44 1904 328284. 9 Keywords: Anticonvulsant, cancer, epilepsy, eslicarbazepine acetate, Nav1.5, S-licarbazepine, 10 voltage-gated Na+ channel. 11 Abstract 12 Eslicarbazepine acetate (ESL) is a dibenzazepine anticonvulsant approved as adjunctive treatment for 13 partial-onset epileptic seizures. Following first pass hydrolysis of ESL, S-licarbazepine (S-Lic) 14 represents around 95 % of circulating active metabolites. S-Lic is the main enantiomer responsible 15 for anticonvulsant activity and this is proposed to be through the blockade of voltage-gated Na+ 16 channels (VGSCs). ESL and S-Lic both have a voltage-dependent inhibitory effect on the Na+ current 17 in N1E-115 neuroblastoma cells expressing neuronal VGSC subtypes including Nav1.1, Nav1.2, 18 Nav1.3, Nav1.6 and Nav1.7.
    [Show full text]
  • Eslicarbazepine Acetate: a New Improvement on a Classic Drug Family for the Treatment of Partial-Onset Seizures
    Drugs R D DOI 10.1007/s40268-017-0197-5 REVIEW ARTICLE Eslicarbazepine Acetate: A New Improvement on a Classic Drug Family for the Treatment of Partial-Onset Seizures 1 1 1 Graciana L. Galiana • Angela C. Gauthier • Richard H. Mattson Ó The Author(s) 2017. This article is an open access publication Abstract Eslicarbazepine acetate is a new anti-epileptic drug belonging to the dibenzazepine carboxamide family Key Points that is currently approved as adjunctive therapy and monotherapy for partial-onset (focal) seizures. The drug Eslicarbazepine acetate is an effective and safe enhances slow inactivation of voltage-gated sodium chan- treatment option for partial-onset seizures as nels and subsequently reduces the activity of rapidly firing adjunctive therapy and monotherapy. neurons. Eslicarbazepine acetate has few, but some, drug– drug interactions. It is a weak enzyme inducer and it Eslicarbazepine acetate improves upon its inhibits cytochrome P450 2C19, but it affects a smaller predecessors, carbamazepine and oxcarbazepine, by assortment of enzymes than carbamazepine. Clinical being available in a once-daily regimen, interacting studies using eslicarbazepine acetate as adjunctive treat- with a smaller range of drugs, and causing less side ment or monotherapy have demonstrated its efficacy in effects. patients with refractory or newly diagnosed focal seizures. The drug is generally well tolerated, and the most common side effects include dizziness, headache, and diplopia. One of the greatest strengths of eslicarbazepine acetate is its ability to be administered only once per day. Eslicar- 1 Introduction bazepine acetate has many advantages over older anti- epileptic drugs, and it should be strongly considered when Epilepsy is a common neurological disorder affecting over treating patients with partial-onset epilepsy.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 25 Mechanisms of Action of Antiepileptic Drugs
    Chapter 25 Mechanisms of action of antiepileptic drugs GRAEME J. SILLS Department of Molecular and Clinical Pharmacology, University of Liverpool _________________________________________________________________________ Introduction The serendipitous discovery of the anticonvulsant properties of phenobarbital in 1912 marked the foundation of the modern pharmacotherapy of epilepsy. The subsequent 70 years saw the introduction of phenytoin, ethosuximide, carbamazepine, sodium valproate and a range of benzodiazepines. Collectively, these compounds have come to be regarded as the ‘established’ antiepileptic drugs (AEDs). A concerted period of development of drugs for epilepsy throughout the 1980s and 1990s has resulted (to date) in 16 new agents being licensed as add-on treatment for difficult-to-control adult and/or paediatric epilepsy, with some becoming available as monotherapy for newly diagnosed patients. Together, these have become known as the ‘modern’ AEDs. Throughout this period of unprecedented drug development, there have also been considerable advances in our understanding of how antiepileptic agents exert their effects at the cellular level. AEDs are neither preventive nor curative and are employed solely as a means of controlling symptoms (i.e. suppression of seizures). Recurrent seizure activity is the manifestation of an intermittent and excessive hyperexcitability of the nervous system and, while the pharmacological minutiae of currently marketed AEDs remain to be completely unravelled, these agents essentially redress the balance between neuronal excitation and inhibition. Three major classes of mechanism are recognised: modulation of voltage-gated ion channels; enhancement of gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA)-mediated inhibitory neurotransmission; and attenuation of glutamate-mediated excitatory neurotransmission. The principal pharmacological targets of currently available AEDs are highlighted in Table 1 and discussed further below.
    [Show full text]
  • Eslicarbazepine Acetate for the Adjunctive Treatment of Partial-Onset Seizures with Or Without Secondary Generalisation in Patients Over 18 Years of Age
    Effective Shared Care Agreement (ESCA) Eslicarbazepine acetate For the adjunctive treatment of partial-onset seizures with or without secondary generalisation in patients over 18 years of age. AREAS OF RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE SHARING OF CARE This shared care agreement outlines suggested ways in which the responsibilities for managing the prescribing of eslicarbazepine acetate for epileptic seizures can be shared between the specialist and general practitioner (GP). You are invited to participate however, if you do not feel confident to undertake this role, then you are not obliged to do so. In such an event, the total clinical responsibility for the patient for the diagnosed condition remains with the specialist. Sharing of care assumes communication between the specialist, GP and patient. The intention to share care will be explained to the patient by the specialist initiating treatment. It is important that patients are consulted about treatment and are in agreement with it. Patients with epilepsy are usually under regular specialist follow-up, which provides an opportunity to discuss drug therapy. The doctor who prescribes the medication legally assumes clinical responsibility for the drug and the consequences of its use. RESPONSIBILITIES and ROLES Specialist responsibilities 1. Confirm the diagnosis of epilepsy. 2. Confirm the patient has used oxcarbazepine (at maximum tolerated dose) or has documentation of intolerance. 3. Obtain approval via Trust’s DTC (or equivalent decision making body) before eslicarbazepine acetate is initiated. Please complete details on page 3. 4. Perform baseline assessment and periodic review of renal and hepatic function (as indicated for each patient). 5. Discuss the potential benefits, treatment side effects, and possible drug interactions with the patient.
    [Show full text]
  • Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Interactions Between Antiepileptics and Antidepressants Domenico Italiano University of Messina, Italy
    University of Kentucky UKnowledge Psychiatry Faculty Publications Psychiatry 11-2014 Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Interactions between Antiepileptics and Antidepressants Domenico Italiano University of Messina, Italy Edoardo Spina University of Messina, Italy Jose de Leon University of Kentucky, [email protected] Right click to open a feedback form in a new tab to let us know how this document benefits oy u. Follow this and additional works at: https://uknowledge.uky.edu/psychiatry_facpub Part of the Psychiatry and Psychology Commons Repository Citation Italiano, Domenico; Spina, Edoardo; and de Leon, Jose, "Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Interactions between Antiepileptics and Antidepressants" (2014). Psychiatry Faculty Publications. 40. https://uknowledge.uky.edu/psychiatry_facpub/40 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Psychiatry at UKnowledge. It has been accepted for inclusion in Psychiatry Faculty Publications by an authorized administrator of UKnowledge. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Interactions between Antiepileptics and Antidepressants Notes/Citation Information Published in Expert Opinion on Drug Metabolism & Toxicology, v. 10, Issue 11, p. 1457-1489. © 2014 Taylor & Francis Group This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis Group in Expert Opinion on Drug Metabolism & Toxicology in Nov. 2014, available online: http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1517/ 17425255.2014.956081 Digital Object Identifier (DOI) http://dx.doi.org/10.1517/17425255.2014.956081 This article is available at UKnowledge: https://uknowledge.uky.edu/psychiatry_facpub/40 1 This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis Group in Expert Opinion on Drug Metabolism & Toxicology in Nov.
    [Show full text]
  • APTIOM (Eslicarbazepine Acetate) Is (S)-10-Acetoxy-10,11-Dihydro-5H­ Dibenz[B,F]Azepine-5-Carboxamide
    HIGHLIGHTS OF PRESCRIBING INFORMATION Monitor and discontinue if another cause cannot be established. (5.2, 5.3, These highlights do not include all the information needed to use 5.4) APTIOM safely and effectively. See full prescribing information for • Hyponatremia: Monitor sodium levels in patients at risk or patients APTIOM. experiencing hyponatremia symptoms. (5.5) • Neurological Adverse Reactions: Monitor for dizziness, disturbance in gait APTIOM® (eslicarbazepine acetate) tablets, for oral use and coordination, somnolence, fatigue, cognitive dysfunction, and visual Initial U.S. Approval: 2013 changes. Use caution when driving or operating machinery. (5.6) • Withdrawal of APTIOM: Withdraw APTIOM gradually to minimize the ---------------------------RECENT MAJOR CHANGES-------------------------­ risk of increased seizure frequency and status epilepticus. (2.6, 5.7, 8.1) Indications and Usage (1) 9/2017 • Dosage and Administration (2) 9/2017 Drug Induced Liver Injury: Discontinue APTIOM in patients with jaundice Warnings and Precautions (5) 9/2017 or evidence of significant liver injury. (5.8) • Hematologic Adverse Reactions: Consider discontinuing. (5.10) ----------------------------INDICATIONS AND USAGE--------------------------­ APTIOM is indicated for the treatment of partial-onset seizures in patients 4 ------------------------------ADVERSE REACTIONS------------------------------­ years of age and older. (1) • Most common adverse reactions in adult patients receiving APTIOM (≥4% and ≥2% greater than placebo): dizziness, somnolence, nausea, headache, ----------------------DOSAGE AND ADMINISTRATION----------------------­ diplopia, vomiting, fatigue, vertigo, ataxia, blurred vision, and tremor. (6.1) • Adult Patients: The recommended initial dosage of APTIOM is 400 mg • Adverse reactions in pediatric patients are similar to those seen in adult once daily. For some patients, treatment may be initiated at 800 mg once patients. daily if the need for seizure reduction outweighs an increased risk of adverse reactions.
    [Show full text]
  • Neuropathic Pain – Pharmacological Management: Draft Scope for Consultation [11Th June to 9Th July 2012] Page 1 of 9 DRAFT
    DRAFT NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR HEALTH AND CLINICAL EXCELLENCE SCOPE 1 Guideline title Neuropathic pain: the pharmacological management of neuropathic pain in adults in non-specialist settings 1.1 Short title Neuropathic pain – pharmacological management 2 The remit This is an update of ‘Neuropathic pain – pharmacological management’ (NICE clinical guideline 96). 3 Clinical need for the guideline 3.1 Epidemiology a) Neuropathic pain refers to a heterogeneous group of disorders resulting from damage to, and dysfunction of, the peripheral and central nervous systems. Common examples of peripheral neuropathic pain include painful diabetic neuropathy, post-herpetic neuralgia and trigeminal neuralgia. Common examples of central neuropathic pain include pain after stroke and after spinal cord injury. b) The main clinical features of neuropathic pain are continuous or intermittent spontaneous pain, typically described as burning, aching or shooting in quality. It is an unpleasant sensory and emotional experience and can have a significant impact on the Neuropathic pain – pharmacological management: draft scope for consultation [11th June to 9th July 2012] Page 1 of 9 DRAFT quality of life, general health, psychological health, and social and economic well-being of people with neuropathic pain. c) Neuropathic pain is an important cause of chronic pain and commonly occurs in people with diabetes and following herpes zoster infection. Neuropathic pain is diagnosed and managed in primary care and secondary care as well as by specialist pain management services (services that provide comprehensive assessment and multi-modal management of all types of pain, including neuropathic pain). However, there is limited evidence on the incidence and prevalence of neuropathic pain outside of specialist pain management services.
    [Show full text]
  • Journal of Central Nervous System Disease a Review Of
    Journal of Central Nervous System Disease OPEN ACCESS Full open access to this and thousands of other papers at EXPERT REVIEW http://www.la-press.com. A Review of Eslicarbazepine Acetate for the Adjunctive Treatment of Partial-Onset Epilepsy Rajinder P. Singh and Jorge J. Asconapé Department of Neurology, Stritch School of Medicine, Loyola University Medical Center, Maywood, Illinois 60153, USA. Corresponding author email: [email protected] Abstract: Eslicarbazepine acetate (ESL) is a novel antiepileptic drug indicated for the treatment of partial-onset seizures. Structurally, it belongs to the dibenzazepine family and is closely related to carbamazepine and oxcarbazepine. Its main mechanism of action is by blocking the voltage-gated sodium channel. ESL is a pro-drug that is rapidly metabolized almost exclusively into S-licarbazepine, the biologically active drug. It has a favorable pharmacokinetic and drug-drug interaction profile. However, it may induce the metabolism of oral contraceptives and should be used with caution in females of child-bearing age. In the pre-marketing placebo-controlled clinical trials ESL has proven effective as adjunctive therapy in adult patients with refractory of partial-onset seizures. Best results were observed on a single daily dose between 800 and 1200 mg. In general, ESL was well tolerated, with most common dose-related side effects including dizziness, somnolence, headache, nausea and vomiting. Hyponatremia has been observed (0.6%–1.3%), but the incidence appears to be lower than with the use of oxcarbazepine. There is very limited information on the use of ESL in children or as monotherapy. Keywords: eslicarbazepine, licarbazepine, dibenzazepine, voltage-gated sodium channel, partial-onset seizures, epilepsy Journal of Central Nervous System Disease 2011:3 179–187 doi: 10.4137/JCNSD.S4888 This article is available from http://www.la-press.com.
    [Show full text]
  • Beyond Amitriptyline
    children Review Beyond Amitriptyline: A Pediatric and Adolescent Oriented Narrative Review of the Analgesic Properties of Psychotropic Medications for the Treatment of Complex Pain and Headache Disorders Robert Blake Windsor 1,2,*, Michael Sierra 2,3, Megan Zappitelli 2,3 and Maria McDaniel 1,2 1 Division of Pediatric Pain Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Prisma Health, Greenville, SC 29607, USA; [email protected] 2 School of Medicine Greenville, University of South Carolina, Greenville, SC 29607, USA; [email protected] (M.S.); [email protected] (M.Z.) 3 Division of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Department of Psychiatry, Prisma Health, Greenville, SC 29607, USA * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 30 October 2020; Accepted: 25 November 2020; Published: 2 December 2020 Abstract: Children and adolescents with recurrent or chronic pain and headache are a complex and heterogenous population. Patients are best served by multi-specialty, multidisciplinary teams to assess and create tailored, individualized pain treatment and rehabilitation plans. Due to the complex nature of pain, generalizing pharmacologic treatment recommendations in children with recurrent or chronic pains is challenging. This is particularly true of complicated patients with co-existing painful and psychiatric conditions. There is an unfortunate dearth of evidence to support many pharmacologic therapies to treat children with chronic pain and headache. This narrative review hopes to supplement the available treatment options for this complex population by reviewing the pediatric and adult literature for analgesic properties of medications that also have psychiatric indication. The medications reviewed belong to medication classes typically described as antidepressants, alpha 2 delta ligands, mood stabilizers, anti-psychotics, anti-sympathetic agents, and stimulants.
    [Show full text]
  • West Essex CCG Anticholinergic Side-Effects and Prescribing Guidance
    Anticholinergic side-effects and prescribing guidance . Anticholinergic (antimuscarinic) medications: associated with increased risks of impaired cognition and falls in patients over the age of 65 years. Recent research also points to a link to mortality increasing with the number and potency of anticholinergic agents prescribed. Anticholinergic Syndrome: is a state of confusion with characteristic features related to dysfunction of the autonomic parasympathetic (cholinergic) nervous system. Symptoms classified into systemic and CNS manifestations: o Systemic (peripheral) symptoms: Blurred vision, photophobia, non-reactive mydriasis, loss of accommodation response, flushed and dry skin, dry mouth, tachycardia, hypertension and fever. Gastrointestinal and urinary motility are frequently reduced o CNS symptoms: Delirium, agitation, disorientation, and visual hallucinations. Ataxia, choreoathetosis, myoclonus and seizures may also occur without peripheral symptoms. Medication Issues: several commonly prescribed medications that may not be thought of as anticholinergic have significant anticholinergic effects, which when taken with known anticholinergic medication can increase the risk of adverse effects. Many medication groups e.g. antihistamines, tricyclic antidepressants, drugs for asthma and COPD, cold preparations, hyoscine have varying degrees of anticholinergic activity and have the potential to cause Anticholinergic Syndrome . Clinicians should be aware of the risk for chronic anticholinergic toxicity and the fact that not all the symptoms may manifest in patients and if they do suffer some symptoms they could be wrongly attributed to another diagnosis Evidence . A study of patients over 65 found that 20% of participants who scored four or more had died by the end of the two year study period compared with 7% of patients with a score of zero.
    [Show full text]
  • Drug-Induced Pruritus: a Review
    Acta Derm Venereol 2009; 89: 236–244 REVIEW ARTICLE Drug-induced Pruritus: A Review Adam REICH1, Sonja STÄNDER2 and Jacek C. SZepietowsKI1,3 1Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, Wroclaw Medical University, 2Clinical Neurodermatology, Department of Dermatology, University Hospital of Münster, Germany, and 3Institute of Immunology and Experimental Therapy, Polish Academy of Sciences, Wroclaw, Poland Pruritus is an unpleasant sensation that leads to scrat- polate to drugs that are prescribed mainly in outpatient ching. In addition to several diseases, the administration clinics, as only inpatients were analysed. In another of drugs may induce pruritus. It is estimated that pru- study on skin reactions due to antibacterial agents used ritus accounts for approximately 5% of all skin adverse in 13,679 patients treated by general practitioners, reactions after drug intake. However, to date there has cutaneous adverse effects were reported in 135 (1%) been no systematic review of the natural course and pos- subjects, and general pruritus accounted for 13.3% of sible underlying mechanisms of drug-induced pruritus. these reactions (4). In a recent analysis of 200 patients For example, no clear distinction has been made between with drug reactions, 12.5% showed pruritus without acute or chronic (lasting more than 6 weeks) forms of skin lesions (5). However, only a few drugs have been pruritus. This review presents a systematic categoriza- analysed more carefully in relation to pruritus, mainly tion of the different forms of drug-induced pruritus, with antimalarials, opioids, and hydroxyethyl starch (see special emphasis on a therapeutic approach to this side- below). Furthermore, analysing the available data on effect.
    [Show full text]