Drug-Induced Pruritus: a Review

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Drug-Induced Pruritus: a Review Acta Derm Venereol 2009; 89: 236–244 REVIEW ARTICLE Drug-induced Pruritus: A Review Adam REICH1, Sonja STÄNDER2 and Jacek C. SZepietowsKI1,3 1Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, Wroclaw Medical University, 2Clinical Neurodermatology, Department of Dermatology, University Hospital of Münster, Germany, and 3Institute of Immunology and Experimental Therapy, Polish Academy of Sciences, Wroclaw, Poland Pruritus is an unpleasant sensation that leads to scrat- polate to drugs that are prescribed mainly in outpatient ching. In addition to several diseases, the administration clinics, as only inpatients were analysed. In another of drugs may induce pruritus. It is estimated that pru- study on skin reactions due to antibacterial agents used ritus accounts for approximately 5% of all skin adverse in 13,679 patients treated by general practitioners, reactions after drug intake. However, to date there has cutaneous adverse effects were reported in 135 (1%) been no systematic review of the natural course and pos- subjects, and general pruritus accounted for 13.3% of sible underlying mechanisms of drug-induced pruritus. these reactions (4). In a recent analysis of 200 patients For example, no clear distinction has been made between with drug reactions, 12.5% showed pruritus without acute or chronic (lasting more than 6 weeks) forms of skin lesions (5). However, only a few drugs have been pruritus. This review presents a systematic categoriza- analysed more carefully in relation to pruritus, mainly tion of the different forms of drug-induced pruritus, with antimalarials, opioids, and hydroxyethyl starch (see special emphasis on a therapeutic approach to this side- below). Furthermore, analysing the available data on effect. Key words: itch; pruritus; chronic; medication; other drugs, it is sometimes very difficult to distinguish side-effects. between “pure” drug-induced pruritus and symptomatic pruritus accompanying, for example, drug-induced (Accepted January 19, 2009.) urticaria or lichenoid eruptions (1, 6, 7). Acta Derm Venereol 2009; 89: 236–244. The natural course of drug-induced pruritus depends on the drug applied and is not stereotypical. Drug- Adam Reich, Department of Dermatology, Venereology induced pruritus may be acute (lasting only several and Allergology, Wroclaw Medical University, Ul. T. days) or chronic (longer duration for weeks or months). Chalubinskiego 1, PL-50-368 Wroclaw, Poland. E-mail: It may start with the first drug administration or may [email protected] be delayed in time. For instance, in case of liver dys- function, pruritus usually appears several weeks after Pruritus is an unpleasant sensation that leads to intensive the start of the treatment (8–11), although it was also scratching (1). Chronic pruritus (lasting longer than 6 reported after relatively short-term therapy periods (12). weeks) is the most common symptom in dermatology Drug-induced pruritus can be localized or generalized and can occur with or without visible skin lesions. Vari- (1, 6, 13), and may resolve shortly after drug disconti- ous skin and systemic diseases have been characterized nuation (14) or may persist even for several months or to be associated with the presence of pruritus, and dif- years after treatment withdrawal (15–17). ferent mechanisms have been proposed to explain its The pathogenesis of drug-induced pruritus differs origin (1, 2). depending upon the causative agent. Pruritus may be We present herein a detailed literature review in order secondary to drug-induced skin lesions, but a number to analyse the frequency and course of drug-induced of other possible mechanisms of drug-induced pruritus pruritus, describe the most frequent drugs inducing have been postulated, including cholestatic liver injury, acute and chronic pruritus, and present a new systematic xerosis of the skin, deposits of drugs or their metabolites categorization of the different forms of drug-induced in the skin, phototoxicity, or neurological alterations. pruritus, with special emphasis on a therapeutic ap- Often, the underlying mechanism is not known (18). proach to this side-effect. CATEGORIES OF DRUG-INDUCED PRURITUS GENERAL CONSIDERATIONS Summarizing our literature research, for some drugs The prevalence of drug-induced pruritus has not been a clear time-relation has been described and interrup- studied well so far. In one large epidemiological study tion of the drug leads to cessation of pruritus. Pruritus it has been shown that, among hospitalized patients, usually lasts less than 6 weeks in this group, fulfilling pruritus without concomitant skin lesions accounted the definition of acute pruritus. In other drugs, pruritus for approximately 5% of adverse reactions after drug lasts much longer due to the underlying mechanisms. intake (3). However, these data are difficult to extra- For example, in hydroxyethyl starch (HES)-induced Acta Derm Venereol 89 © 2009 The Authors. doi: 10.2340/00015555-0650 Journal Compilation © 2009 Acta Dermato-Venereologica. ISSN 0001-5555 Drug-induced pruritus 237 pruritus, neuronal storage of the substance evokes may suffer from generalized itching (64, 65, 139). pruritus, which slowly relieves after degradation of Chloroquine-induced pruritus is the most common the substance. This can be grouped as chronic pruri- adverse drug reaction experienced by Black Africans, tus, since it lasts for more than 6 weeks. In addition, and negatively affects compliance with antimalarial many drugs are described to induce chronic pruritus by therapy (62). It has been shown that more than 10% unknown mechanisms. In this group of drug-induced of pregnant women avoided malaria chemoprophylaxis pruritus, therapy is very difficult, including the decision with chloroquine due to the fear of pruritus (67). An- to interrupt or change the drug prescription. According other study on antenatal patients documented that the to our experience, interruption for at least 6 weeks is frequency of pruritus with chloroquine was the only necessary to prove that chronic pruritus is due to the factor that correlated with the continuation of the use accused drug. In sum, several groups of drug-induced of this drug for malaria (140). pruritus can be defined, as summarized in Table I. Pruritus was also reported after other antimalarials, The most important groups of drugs that might be such as amodiaquine, halofantrine and hydroxychloro- responsible for pruritus are listed in Table II. However, quine, although less commonly and with lower intensity these data must be considered with some caution, as it is (68–71). Frequently, aquagenic or post-wetness type almost impossible to mention all drugs that could evoke of pruritus without visible skin lesions was observed, itching. Pruritus is most often mentioned as a complica- usually located in the lower extremities and back (71). tion after systemic drugs. However, pruritus may also It appeared approximately 1–3 weeks after initiation accompany local skin or mucous membrane reaction of treatment and developed mainly after hot showers, after topical application of different medicines, e.g. beginning within minutes of water contact, persisting at ciprofloxacin (132) or calcineurin inhibitors (133). a high intensity for several minutes, and then remaining at low intensity for several hours (71). The pathogenesis of chloroquine-induced pruritus ACUTE PRURITUS remains unclear. Genetic background seems to be a Pruritus induced by chloroquine and other antimalarials strong predisposing factor, as this symptom is observed mainly in Black Africans. Chloroquine has been shown Chloroquine, a widely used anti-malarial agent, may to release histamine, and antihistamic drugs have been produce pruritus of unknown mechanism in up to 60– demonstrated to be effective in a subgroup of patients 70% of Black Africans (61–64). This type of pruritus (61, 62, 72). Severity of pruritus also correlated with has been considered as severe in almost 60% of pruritic the antecedent malaria parasite density in the blood subjects (62–64). Interestingly, chloroquine-induced (61). Furthermore, there was a reduced frequency of the pruritus is uncommon in Caucasian or Asian people sickle cell trait among itchers relative to non-itchers, (65, 66). In the study by Bussaratid et al. (65) among while glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase deficiency Thailand’s population only 1.9% of over 1000 malaria was more common among pruritics than non-pruritics patients experienced pruritus due to chloroquine (141). In addition, it was suggested that subjects with therapy. Regarding Black Africans, pruritus appeared pruritus may present slower metabolism of chloroquine, mainly in young patients (< 40 years of age) and the leading to higher plasma concentrations of chloroquine, majority of patients experienced the onset of itching although the overall pharmacokinetic patterns were within the first 24 h after chloroquine ingestion (64). comparable in both pruritic and non-pruritic patients Pruritus lasted longer than 48 h after the last dose of (73, 74). Another possibility is mediation of pruritus chloroquine in nearly half of the patients (64). The in malaria individuals by endogenous opioid peptides longest duration for chloroquine-induced pruritus via μ-opioid receptors (62, 75). Based on these data, was 7 days (139). Chloroquine-induced pruritus may it seems that chloroquine-induced pruritus should be be limited to the hands and feet, while other subjects considered as a multifactorial phenomenon. Table I. Drug-induced pruritus (without
Recommended publications
  • Domains: 1. Optimizing Medication Use, Using Front- and Back Office Strategies 2
    A SUPPLEMENTARY TABLES Table S1: Domains and themes in the action plan of the Belgian Government (2015-2020) Domains: 1. Optimizing medication use, using front- and back office strategies 2. Continuity of pharmacotherapy in light of transmural care 3. Scientific skills of the hospital pharmacist 4. Transfer of information to and communication with the patient Themes: 2015: anchoring the minimal conditions for the application of clinical pharmacy 2016: development of a structured method for the anamnesis, registration and communication of the medication on admission and discharge 2017: application of clinical pharmacy for specific therapies 2018: application of risk screening for patient groups 2019: application of risk screening for medication groups or pathologies 2020: evaluation of the development of clinical pharmacy in the Belgian hospitals and evaluation of the action plan 2015-2020 Table S2: Anatomical and therapeutic classes of the drugs involved in the discrepancies detected after medication reconciliation n (%) Example(s) of discrepancy Gastro-intestinal system 43 (35.2%) antacids 6 O: antacid PRN antihistaminics 1 O: ranitidine 150 mg 1 pd proton pump inhibitors 5 O: pantoprazole 20 mg 1 pd propulsives 3 O: domperidone PRN; N: alizapride laxatives 9 O: macrogol PRN or 1 pd, bisacodyl PRN or 1 pd antipropulsives 2 O: loperamide 1 pd probiotics 1 O: frequent need for probiotics antidiabetics 1 D: dose repaglinide unknown multivitamins 5 O: multivitamins 1 pd vitamin D 5 O: vitamin D 1 per week vitamin B 2 N: vitamin B complex
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix A: Potentially Inappropriate Prescriptions (Pips) for Older People (Modified from ‘STOPP/START 2’ O’Mahony Et Al 2014)
    Appendix A: Potentially Inappropriate Prescriptions (PIPs) for older people (modified from ‘STOPP/START 2’ O’Mahony et al 2014) Consider holding (or deprescribing - consult with patient): 1. Any drug prescribed without an evidence-based clinical indication 2. Any drug prescribed beyond the recommended duration, where well-defined 3. Any duplicate drug class (optimise monotherapy) Avoid hazardous combinations e.g.: 1. The Triple Whammy: NSAID + ACE/ARB + diuretic in all ≥ 65 year olds (NHS Scotland 2015) 2. Sick Day Rules drugs: Metformin or ACEi/ARB or a diuretic or NSAID in ≥ 65 year olds presenting with dehydration and/or acute kidney injury (AKI) (NHS Scotland 2015) 3. Anticholinergic Burden (ACB): Any additional medicine with anticholinergic properties when already on an Anticholinergic/antimuscarinic (listed overleaf) in > 65 year olds (risk of falls, increased anticholinergic toxicity: confusion, agitation, acute glaucoma, urinary retention, constipation). The following are known to contribute to the ACB: Amantadine Antidepressants, tricyclic: Amitriptyline, Clomipramine, Dosulepin, Doxepin, Imipramine, Nortriptyline, Trimipramine and SSRIs: Fluoxetine, Paroxetine Antihistamines, first generation (sedating): Clemastine, Chlorphenamine, Cyproheptadine, Diphenhydramine/-hydrinate, Hydroxyzine, Promethazine; also Cetirizine, Loratidine Antipsychotics: especially Clozapine, Fluphenazine, Haloperidol, Olanzepine, and phenothiazines e.g. Prochlorperazine, Trifluoperazine Baclofen Carbamazepine Disopyramide Loperamide Oxcarbazepine Pethidine
    [Show full text]
  • Genital Lichen Simplex Chronicus (Eczema, Neurodermatitis, Dermatitis) !
    Libby Edwards, MD Genital Lichen Simplex Chronicus (eczema, neurodermatitis, dermatitis) ! Lichen simplex chronicus (LSC), or eczema, is a common skin condition that is very itchy. Although not dangerous in any way, both the itching, and the pain from rubbing and scratching, can be miserable. Eczema/LSC of the genital area most often affects the scrotum of men, the vulva of women, or the rectal skin of both. Many people with eczema/LSC have had sensitive skin or eczema/LSC on other areas of the skin at some point, and many have a tendency towards allergies, especially hay fever or asthma. ! The skin usually appears red or dark, and thick from rubbing and scratching, sometimes with sores from scratching. ! The cause of eczema/LSC is not entirely clear. However, eczema/LSC starts with irritation that triggers itching. Often, at the office visit with the health care provider, the original infection or other initial cause of irritation is no longer present. Common triggers include a yeast or fungus infection, an irritating medication, moisturizer or lubricant, a wet bathing suit, anxiety or depression, over-washing, panty liners, sweat, heat, urine, a contraceptive jelly, an irritating condom, or any other activity or substance that can irritate the skin and start the itching. ! Although rubbing and scratching often feel good at first, rubbing irritates the skin and ultimately makes itching even worse, so that there is more scratching, then more itching, then more scratching. This is called the “itch-scratch cycle.” Treatment is very effective and requires clearing any infection and avoiding irritants as well as using a strong cortisone.
    [Show full text]
  • Inhibitory Effect of Eslicarbazepine Acetate and S-Licarbazepine on 2 Nav1.5 Channels
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.04.24.059188; this version posted August 14, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY 4.0 International license. 1 Inhibitory effect of eslicarbazepine acetate and S-licarbazepine on 2 Nav1.5 channels 3 Theresa K. Leslie1, Lotte Brückner 1, Sangeeta Chawla1,2, William J. Brackenbury1,2* 4 1Department of Biology, University of York, Heslington, York, YO10 5DD, UK 5 2York Biomedical Research Institute, University of York, Heslington, York, YO10 5DD, UK 6 * Correspondence: Dr William J. Brackenbury, Department of Biology and York Biomedical 7 Research Institute, University of York, Wentworth Way, Heslington, York YO10 5DD, UK. Email: 8 [email protected]. Tel: +44 1904 328284. 9 Keywords: Anticonvulsant, cancer, epilepsy, eslicarbazepine acetate, Nav1.5, S-licarbazepine, 10 voltage-gated Na+ channel. 11 Abstract 12 Eslicarbazepine acetate (ESL) is a dibenzazepine anticonvulsant approved as adjunctive treatment for 13 partial-onset epileptic seizures. Following first pass hydrolysis of ESL, S-licarbazepine (S-Lic) 14 represents around 95 % of circulating active metabolites. S-Lic is the main enantiomer responsible 15 for anticonvulsant activity and this is proposed to be through the blockade of voltage-gated Na+ 16 channels (VGSCs). ESL and S-Lic both have a voltage-dependent inhibitory effect on the Na+ current 17 in N1E-115 neuroblastoma cells expressing neuronal VGSC subtypes including Nav1.1, Nav1.2, 18 Nav1.3, Nav1.6 and Nav1.7.
    [Show full text]
  • Eslicarbazepine Acetate: a New Improvement on a Classic Drug Family for the Treatment of Partial-Onset Seizures
    Drugs R D DOI 10.1007/s40268-017-0197-5 REVIEW ARTICLE Eslicarbazepine Acetate: A New Improvement on a Classic Drug Family for the Treatment of Partial-Onset Seizures 1 1 1 Graciana L. Galiana • Angela C. Gauthier • Richard H. Mattson Ó The Author(s) 2017. This article is an open access publication Abstract Eslicarbazepine acetate is a new anti-epileptic drug belonging to the dibenzazepine carboxamide family Key Points that is currently approved as adjunctive therapy and monotherapy for partial-onset (focal) seizures. The drug Eslicarbazepine acetate is an effective and safe enhances slow inactivation of voltage-gated sodium chan- treatment option for partial-onset seizures as nels and subsequently reduces the activity of rapidly firing adjunctive therapy and monotherapy. neurons. Eslicarbazepine acetate has few, but some, drug– drug interactions. It is a weak enzyme inducer and it Eslicarbazepine acetate improves upon its inhibits cytochrome P450 2C19, but it affects a smaller predecessors, carbamazepine and oxcarbazepine, by assortment of enzymes than carbamazepine. Clinical being available in a once-daily regimen, interacting studies using eslicarbazepine acetate as adjunctive treat- with a smaller range of drugs, and causing less side ment or monotherapy have demonstrated its efficacy in effects. patients with refractory or newly diagnosed focal seizures. The drug is generally well tolerated, and the most common side effects include dizziness, headache, and diplopia. One of the greatest strengths of eslicarbazepine acetate is its ability to be administered only once per day. Eslicar- 1 Introduction bazepine acetate has many advantages over older anti- epileptic drugs, and it should be strongly considered when Epilepsy is a common neurological disorder affecting over treating patients with partial-onset epilepsy.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 25 Mechanisms of Action of Antiepileptic Drugs
    Chapter 25 Mechanisms of action of antiepileptic drugs GRAEME J. SILLS Department of Molecular and Clinical Pharmacology, University of Liverpool _________________________________________________________________________ Introduction The serendipitous discovery of the anticonvulsant properties of phenobarbital in 1912 marked the foundation of the modern pharmacotherapy of epilepsy. The subsequent 70 years saw the introduction of phenytoin, ethosuximide, carbamazepine, sodium valproate and a range of benzodiazepines. Collectively, these compounds have come to be regarded as the ‘established’ antiepileptic drugs (AEDs). A concerted period of development of drugs for epilepsy throughout the 1980s and 1990s has resulted (to date) in 16 new agents being licensed as add-on treatment for difficult-to-control adult and/or paediatric epilepsy, with some becoming available as monotherapy for newly diagnosed patients. Together, these have become known as the ‘modern’ AEDs. Throughout this period of unprecedented drug development, there have also been considerable advances in our understanding of how antiepileptic agents exert their effects at the cellular level. AEDs are neither preventive nor curative and are employed solely as a means of controlling symptoms (i.e. suppression of seizures). Recurrent seizure activity is the manifestation of an intermittent and excessive hyperexcitability of the nervous system and, while the pharmacological minutiae of currently marketed AEDs remain to be completely unravelled, these agents essentially redress the balance between neuronal excitation and inhibition. Three major classes of mechanism are recognised: modulation of voltage-gated ion channels; enhancement of gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA)-mediated inhibitory neurotransmission; and attenuation of glutamate-mediated excitatory neurotransmission. The principal pharmacological targets of currently available AEDs are highlighted in Table 1 and discussed further below.
    [Show full text]
  • Lichen Simplex Chronicus
    LICHEN SIMPLEX CHRONICUS http://www.aocd.org Lichen simplex chronicus is a localized form of lichenified (thickened, inflamed) atopic dermatitis or eczema that occurs in well defined plaques. It is the result of ongoing, chronic rubbing and scratching of the skin in localized areas. It is generally seen in patients greater than 20 years of age and is more frequent in women. Emotional stress can play a part in the course of this skin disease. There is mainly one symptom: itching. The rubbing and scratching that occurs in response to the itch can become automatic and even unconscious making it very difficult to treat. It can be magnified by seeming innocuous stimuli such as putting on clothes, or clothes rubbing the skin which makes the skin warmer resulting in increased itch sensation. The lesions themselves are generally very well defined areas of thickened, erythematous, raised area of skin. Frequently they are linear, oval or round in shape. Sites of predilection include the back of the neck, ankles, lower legs, upper thighs, forearms and the genital areas. They can be single lesions or multiple. This can be a very difficult condition to treat much less resolve. It is of utmost importance that the scratching and rubbing of the skin must stop. Treatment is usually initiated with topical corticosteroids for larger areas and intralesional steroids might also be considered for small lesion(s). If the patient simply cannot keep from rubbing the area an occlusive dressing might be considered to keep the skin protected from probing fingers. Since this is not a histamine driven itch phenomena oral antihistamines are generally of little use in these cases.
    [Show full text]
  • Drug Repurposing for the Management of Depression: Where Do We Stand Currently?
    life Review Drug Repurposing for the Management of Depression: Where Do We Stand Currently? Hosna Mohammad Sadeghi 1,†, Ida Adeli 1,† , Taraneh Mousavi 1,2, Marzieh Daniali 1,2, Shekoufeh Nikfar 3,4,5 and Mohammad Abdollahi 1,2,* 1 Toxicology and Diseases Group (TDG), Pharmaceutical Sciences Research Center (PSRC), The Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences (TIPS), Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran 1417614411, Iran; [email protected] (H.M.S.); [email protected] (I.A.); [email protected] (T.M.); [email protected] (M.D.) 2 Department of Toxicology and Pharmacology, School of Pharmacy, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran 1417614411, Iran 3 Personalized Medicine Research Center, Endocrinology and Metabolism Research Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran 1417614411, Iran; [email protected] 4 Pharmaceutical Sciences Research Center (PSRC) and the Pharmaceutical Management and Economics Research Center (PMERC), Evidence-Based Evaluation of Cost-Effectiveness and Clinical Outcomes Group, The Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences (TIPS), Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran 1417614411, Iran 5 Department of Pharmacoeconomics and Pharmaceutical Administration, School of Pharmacy, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran 1417614411, Iran * Correspondence: [email protected] † Equally contributed as first authors. Citation: Mohammad Sadeghi, H.; Abstract: A slow rate of new drug discovery and higher costs of new drug development attracted Adeli, I.; Mousavi, T.; Daniali, M.; the attention of scientists and physicians for the repurposing and repositioning of old medications. Nikfar, S.; Abdollahi, M. Drug Experimental studies and off-label use of drugs have helped drive data for further studies of ap- Repurposing for the Management of proving these medications.
    [Show full text]
  • The Dyshidrotic Eczema Area and Severity Index – a Score Developed for the Assessment of Dyshidrotic Eczema
    Clinical and Laboratory Investigations Dermatology 1999;198:265–269 Received: September 29, 1998 Accepted: February 19, 1999 The Dyshidrotic Eczema Area and Severity Index – A Score Developed for the Assessment of Dyshidrotic Eczema E. Vocks a S.G. Plötz b J. Ring a aDepartment of Dermatology and Allergology Biederstein, Technical University München, and bResearch Center Borstel, Center for Medicine and Bioscience, Borstel, Germany Key Words factors, such as atopic eczema, contact allergy or mycosis, Severity index • Dyshidrotic eczema • Pompholyx • but many cases are also classified as idiopathic [1–3]. As it Treatment study can be very resistant to treatment [4], studies with regard to new therapeutic modalities in dyshidrotic eczema are important. The evaluation of therapeutic effects is carried Abstract out by different methods. In most studies global assessment Background: Dyshidrotic eczema of the palms and soles methods like grading of improvement [5–8] are used. Hand is a common condition, which can be rather resistant to eczema scoring systems which are applied to eczema on the treatment. Therapy studies and their comparability are of palmar and dorsal hands are not specific for the distinct fea- clinical importance. Objective: As standardized assess- tures of dyshidrotic eczema [9]. Since the assessment meth- ment methods for the severity of this particular form of ods for dyshidrotic eczema are not standardized, therapeutic eczema are lacking, we developed a severity index for studies are not comparable and data cannot be utilized for dyshidrotic eczema. Methods: The Dyshidrotic Eczema epidemiologic purposes. As there is no specific scoring sys- Area and Severity Index (DASI) is based on the severity tem existing, we developed a severity index for dyshidrotic grade of single items – number of vesicles per square eczema on the occasion of a half-side treatment study with centimetre (V), erythema (E), desquamation (S) and itch tap water iontophoresis [10].
    [Show full text]
  • The Use of Stems in the Selection of International Nonproprietary Names (INN) for Pharmaceutical Substances
    WHO/PSM/QSM/2006.3 The use of stems in the selection of International Nonproprietary Names (INN) for pharmaceutical substances 2006 Programme on International Nonproprietary Names (INN) Quality Assurance and Safety: Medicines Medicines Policy and Standards The use of stems in the selection of International Nonproprietary Names (INN) for pharmaceutical substances FORMER DOCUMENT NUMBER: WHO/PHARM S/NOM 15 © World Health Organization 2006 All rights reserved. Publications of the World Health Organization can be obtained from WHO Press, World Health Organization, 20 Avenue Appia, 1211 Geneva 27, Switzerland (tel.: +41 22 791 3264; fax: +41 22 791 4857; e-mail: [email protected]). Requests for permission to reproduce or translate WHO publications – whether for sale or for noncommercial distribution – should be addressed to WHO Press, at the above address (fax: +41 22 791 4806; e-mail: [email protected]). The designations employed and the presentation of the material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the World Health Organization concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. Dotted lines on maps represent approximate border lines for which there may not yet be full agreement. The mention of specific companies or of certain manufacturers’ products does not imply that they are endorsed or recommended by the World Health Organization in preference to others of a similar nature that are not mentioned. Errors and omissions excepted, the names of proprietary products are distinguished by initial capital letters.
    [Show full text]
  • 288 Part 348—External Analgesic Drug Products
    Pt. 348 21 CFR Ch. I (4–1–11 Edition) should be used and any or all of the ad- Subpart C—Labeling ditional indications for sunscreen drug 348.50 Labeling of external analgesic drug products may be used. products. (c) Warnings. The labeling of the AUTHORITY: 21 U.S.C. 321, 351, 352, 353, 355, product states, under the heading 360, 371. ‘‘Warnings,’’ the warning(s) for each in- gredient in the combination, as estab- SOURCE: 57 FR 27656, June 19, 1992, unless otherwise noted. lished in the warnings section of the applicable OTC drug monographs un- less otherwise stated in this paragraph Subpart A—General Provisions (c). § 348.1 Scope. (1) For combinations containing a skin (a) An over-the-counter external an- protectant and a sunscreen identified in algesic drug product in a form suitable §§ 347.20(d) and 352.20(b). The warnings for topical administration is generally for sunscreen drug products in recognized as safe and effective and is § 352.60(c) of this chapter are used. not misbranded if it meets each condi- (2) [Reserved] tion in this part and each general con- (d) Directions. The labeling of the dition established in § 330.1 of this product states, under the heading ‘‘Di- chapter. rections,’’ directions that conform to (b) References in this part to regu- the directions established for each in- latory sections of the Code of Federal gredient in the directions sections of Regulations are to chapter I of title 21 the applicable OTC drug monographs, unless otherwise noted. unless otherwise stated in this para- § 348.3 Definitions.
    [Show full text]
  • Deadly Pediatric Poisons: Nine Common Agents That Kill at Low Doses Joshua B
    Emerg Med Clin N Am 22 (2004) 1019–1050 Deadly pediatric poisons: nine common agents that kill at low doses Joshua B. Michael, MD, Matthew D. Sztajnkrycer, MD, PhD* Department of Emergency Medicine, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN 55905, USA Children are exposed more frequently to potentially toxic substances than any other age group [1]. According to data compiled by the American Association of Poison Control Centers (AAPCC), more than 1.3 million exposures involving children age 12 and younger were reported to poison control centers in 2001 [2]. Of these, more than 1 million (79%) involved children 3 years old or younger. The peak incidence for pediatric poisonings occurs in toddlers age 1 to 3 years, as does the peak incidence for hospitalization [3]. Most exposures in this age group are unintentional and reflect acquisition of developmental milestones and subsequent behaviors while exploring the environment. Children may be attracted to potentially toxic substances based on color or appearance of the agent or the container, mistakenly identifying it as a candy or beverage. Younger children are more willing to taste dangerous substances than older children and perform hand-mouth behaviors nearly 10 times an hour [4,5]. Physical environmental change plays a significant role in the epidemiology of accidental ingestion [6]. In approximately half of all accidental poisonings, the product either was in use at the time of ingestion or had been moved recently from its usual storage site. Ingestion characteristics differ significantly in toddler exposures com- pared with adolescent or adult exposures [7]. Most exposures are nontoxic because the intent is exploration rather than self-harm.
    [Show full text]