DOCSLIB.ORG

4. General Government Expenditures

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
4. General Government Expenditures III. PUBLIC FINANCE AND ECONOMICS 4. General government expenditures Governments spend money to provide goods and services differences between countries. Between 2000 and 2009, the and redistribute income. Like government revenues, largest increases in government expenditures per person government expenditures reflect historical and current were recorded in Korea, Estonia and Ireland (over 6%) while political decisions but are also highly sensitive to economic in Austria, Italy, Japan and Switzerland the increases were developments. General government spending as a share of equal to or below 1%; and in Israel there was no change. GDP and per person provide an indication of the size of the government across countries. However, the large variation in these ratios highlights different approaches to delivering public goods and services and providing social protection, not necessarily differences in resources spent. For instance, Methodology and definitions if support is given via tax breaks rather than direct Government expenditures data are derived from the expenditures, expenditure/GDP ratios will naturally be OECD National Accounts Statistics, which are based on lower. In addition, it is important to note that the size of the System of National Accounts (SNA), a set of inter- expenditures does not reflect government efficiency or nationally agreed concepts, definitions, classifica- productivity. tions and rules for national accounting. In SNA Government expenditures represented 46% of GDP across terminology, general government consists of central, OECD member countries in 2009. In general, OECD-EU state and local governments and social security member countries have a higher ratio than other OECD funds. member countries. Denmark, Finland and France spend Gross domestic product (GDP) is the standard the most as a share of GDP, with government expenditures measure of the value of the goods and services equal to or above 56%, whereas Mexico, Chile, Korea and produced by a country during a period. Government Switzerland spend the least, with shares between 24% and expenditures per person were calculated by convert- 34% of GDP. ing total government expenditures to USD 2009 using Since 2000, the size of government spending increased in the OECD/Eurostat purchasing power parities (PPP) for the majority of OECD member countries by an average of GDP and dividing by population (for the countries 4.3 percentage points of GDP. Most of this increase occurred whose source is the IMF Economic Outlook an implied since the start of the financial and economic crisis. PPP conversion rate was used). PPP is the number of Between 2000 and 2007, OECD member countries decreased units of country B’s currency needed to purchase the their share of government spending on average by same quantity of goods and services in country A. 0.6 percentage points of GDP. After the start of crisis, the share of government spending increased by 4.9 percentage points across the OECD during 2007-09. Only part of this increase reflects declining GDP; part also reflects increased government expenditures precipitated by the need to ensure Further reading the stability of the financial system and to stimulate the economy in response to the crisis. During 2007-09, the larg- OECD (2011), National Accounts at a Glance 2010, OECD est increases in government expenditures as a share of GDP Publishing, Paris. occurred in Ireland (+12.1 percentage points) and Estonia (+10.8 percentage points), whereas Israel was the only OECD member country that recorded a decrease in the ratio Figure notes (–0.7 percentage points). Data for Australia, Japan, Korea, New Zealand and the Russian Federation The difference in government expenditures per person is are for 2008 rather than 2009. Data for Mexico are for 2003 rather very large between OECD member countries. Luxembourg than 2000. Data for the Russian Federation are for 2002 rather spends almost eleven times more per person than Mexico, than 2000. although expenditures per person in Mexico have been 4.1: Data for 2000 for Turkey and for 2000 and 2007 for Chile are not avail- increasing at an above average pace. Though government able and these countries are not included in the average (OECD32). expenditures per person rose in all OECD member coun- 4.3: Data for Chile and Turkey are not available. tries except Israel since 2000, there have been significant Information on data for Israel: http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/888932315602. 64 GOVERNMENT AT A GLANCE 2011 © OECD 2011 III. PUBLIC FINANCE AND ECONOMICS 4. General government expenditures 4.1 General government expenditures as a percentage of GDP (2000, 2007 and 2009) % 2009 2007 2000 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 k d n s d y d y n d s g d n d n a r n ce m ria d n r ia n ia n n n ea ia n u t n gal way blic ael ada ur blic key alia r azil rica dia es ma la a eece Italy ga tu r u pai ton sr n tate u tr rla Chile r atio In n n n r wede r us gdomrla rela r rman S s I S eala ur Japa Ko B r Chin Fi F G A n Icela un loven I No E Pola Ca T us Mexico do De S Belgi H S Po Ge OECD32 A th Af n ited xembow Z witze u I n u e S o ited Ki Nethe L N n FedeS n U lovak Rep ia U Czech Rep S uss R Source: For OECD countries: OECD National Accounts Statistics. For the other major economies (excluding the Russian Federation): International Monetary Fund (2010), Economic Outlook, April 2011, IMF, Washington DC. 1 2 http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/888932389873 4.2 General government expenditures 4.3 Annual real percentage change of general per person (2009) government expenditures per person (2000 to 2009) Luxembourg Korea Norway Estonia Denmark Ireland Netherlands Sweden Poland Austria Mexico Finland Greece Belgium United Kingdom Ireland Czech Republic United States France Iceland Iceland United States United Kingdom Slovenia Germany Hungary Italy Finland Canada Greece Luxembourg OECD34 OECD32 Switzerland Spain Spain New Zealand Australia Netherlands Slovenia Japan Slovak Republic New Zealand Portugal Israel Norway Portugal Belgium Czech Republic Australia Hungary Slovak Republic Canada Estonia France Poland Germany Korea Sweden Turkey Denmark Chile Mexico Austria Italy Russian Federation Japan Brazil Switzerland South Africa Israel China India Indonesia Russian Federation 0 5 000 10 000 15 000 20 000 25 000 30 000 35 000 01234 5 678 2009 USD PPP % Source: For OECD countries: OECD National Accounts Statistics. For the other Source: OECD National Accounts Statistics. major economies (excluding the Russian Federation): International 1 2 http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/888932389911 Monetary Fund (2010), Economic Outlook, April 2011, IMF, Washington DC. 1 2 http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/888932389892 GOVERNMENT AT A GLANCE 2011 © OECD 2011 65 From: Government at a Glance 2011 Access the complete publication at: https://doi.org/10.1787/gov_glance-2011-en Please cite this chapter as: OECD (2011), “General government expenditures”, in Government at a Glance 2011, OECD Publishing, Paris. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1787/gov_glance-2011-10-en This work is published under the responsibility of the Secretary-General of the OECD. The opinions expressed and arguments employed herein do not necessarily reflect the official views of OECD member countries. This document and any map included herein are without prejudice to the status of or sovereignty over any territory, to the delimitation of international frontiers and boundaries and to the name of any territory, city or area. You can copy, download or print OECD content for your own use, and you can include excerpts from OECD publications, databases and multimedia products in your own documents, presentations, blogs, websites and teaching materials, provided that suitable acknowledgment of OECD as source and copyright owner is given. All requests for public or commercial use and translation rights should be submitted to [email protected]. Requests for permission to photocopy portions of this material for public or commercial use shall be addressed directly to the Copyright Clearance Center (CCC) at [email protected] or the Centre français d’exploitation du droit de copie (CFC) at [email protected]..
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Simplified WWII Timeline
    ~ Belz Museum of Asian and Judaic Art ~ Holocaust Memorial Gallery ~ Simplified World War II Timeline 1933 JANUARY 30, 1933 German President Paul von Hindenburg appointed Adolf Hitler chancellor. At the time, Hitler was leader of the National Socialist German Workers' Party (Nazi party). FEBRUARY 27-28, 1933 The German parliament (Reichstag) building burned down under mysterious circumstances. The government treated it as an act of terrorism. FEBRUARY 28, 1933 Hitler convinced President von Hindenburg to invoke an emergency clause in the Weimar Constitution. The German parliament then passed the Decree of the Reich President for the Protection of Nation (Volk) and State, popularly known as the Reichstag Fire Decree, the decree suspended the civil rights provisions in the existing German constitution, including freedom of speech, assembly, and press, and formed the basis for the incarceration of potential opponents of the Nazis without benefit of trial or judicial proceeding. MARCH 22, 1933 The SS (Schutzstaffel), Hitler's “elite guard,” established a concentration camp outside the town of Dachau, Germany, for political opponents of the regime. It was the only concentration camp to remain in operation from 1933 until 1945. By 1934, the SS had taken over administration of the entire Nazi concentration camp system. MARCH 23, 1933 The German parliament passed the Enabling Act, which empowered Hitler to establish a dictatorship in Germany. APRIL 1, 1933 The Nazis organized a nationwide boycott of Jewish-owned businesses in Germany. Many local boycotts continued throughout much of the 1930s. APRIL 7, 1933 The Nazi government passed the Law for the Restoration of the Professional Civil Service, which excluded Jews and political opponents from university and governmental positions.
    [Show full text]
  • Krakow HISTORY
    Krakow HISTORY The first documented reference to Krakow can be found in records from 965 of the Cordova merchant Abraham ben Jacob. He mentions a rich burg city situated at the crossing of trade routes and surrounded by woods. In the 10th century Mieszko I incorporated Krakow into the Polish state. During the times of Boleslaw the Brave, the bishopric of Krakow was established (1000) and the construction of Wawel Cathedral began. In 1038, Casimir I the Restorer made Wawel Castle its seat, thus making Krakow the capital of Poland. The high duke Boleslav V the Chaste following the example of Wrocław, introduced city rights modelled on the Magdeburg law allowing for tax benefits and new trade privileges for the citizens in 1257. In the 15th century, Krakow became the center of lively cultural, artistic, and scientific development. Photo: A fragment of colourful woodcut depicting Krakow. Source: https://www.muzeumkrakowa.pl The 17th and 18th centuries were a period of a gradual decline of the city's importance. Due to the first partition of Poland in 1772, the southern part of Little Poland was seized by the Austrian army. On March 24, 1794 Kościuszko's Insurrection began in Krakow. Temporarily included into the Warsaw Duchy, it was given the status of a "free city" after Napoleon's downfall. After the defeat of the November Insurrection (1831), Krakow preserved its autonomy as the only intact part of Poland. In 1846, it was absorbed into the Austrian Monarchy again. After independence was regained in 1918, Krakow became a significant administrative and cultural center.
    [Show full text]
  • Poles Under German Occupation the Situation and Attitudes of Poles During the German Occupation
    Truth About Camps | W imię prawdy historycznej (en) https://en.truthaboutcamps.eu/thn/poles-under-german-occu/15596,Poles-under-German-Occupation.html 2021-09-25, 22:48 Poles under German Occupation The Situation and Attitudes of Poles during the German Occupation The Polish population found itself in a very difficult situation during the very first days of the war, both in the territories incorporated into the Third Reich and in The General Government. The policy of the German occupier was primarily aimed at the liquidation of the Polish intellectual elite and leadership, and at the subsequent enslavement, maximal exploitation, and Germanization of Polish society. Terror was conducted on a mass and general scale. Executions, resettlements, arrests, deportations to camps, and street round-ups were a constant element of the everyday life of Poles during the war. Initially the policy of the German occupier was primarily aimed at the liquidation of the Polish intellectual elite and leadership, and at the subsequent enslavement, maximal exploitation, and Germanization of Polish society. Terror was conducted on a mass and general scale. Food rationing was imposed in cities and towns, with food coupons covering about one-third of a person’s daily needs. Levies — obligatory, regular deliveries of selected produce — were introduced in the countryside. Farmers who failed to deliver their levy were subject to severe repressions, including the death penalty. Devaluation and difficulty with finding employment were the reason for most Poles’ poverty and for the everyday problems in obtaining basic products. The occupier also limited access to healthcare. The birthrate fell dramatically while the incidence of infectious diseases increased significantly.
    [Show full text]
  • The Architecture of the Third Reich in Cracow – a Dissonant Heritage?1
    RIHA Journal 0253 | 20 December 2020 The Architecture of the Third Reich in Cracow – a Dissonant Heritage? 1 Jacek Purchla Abstract On 12 October 1939, Hitler signed a decree creating the Generalgouvernement (General Government), which comprised the Polish lands occupied by Germany but not subsumed directly into the Reich. Cracow became the capital of the General Government. This decided the fate of the city, for which the Nazi authorities had essentially predestined the role not only of capital of this Nebenland, but also that of a model German city in the East. How, then, should we evaluate the contribution of the Third Reich to the shaping of Cracow's cultural landscape during the 1,961 days of the city's enforced status as capital? There is no unequivocal answer to this question, and the building stock left by the Germans in Cracow is extremely heterogeneous. We do have a certain number of intriguing examples of the dissonant heritage left by the German Third Reich in Cracow today. These represent above all a broad spectrum of conflicts of memory, and also the problem of non-memory. Contents The General Government and its capital Cracow as a "model German city" in the East Architect Richard Rattinger Hubert Ritter and his "Generalbebaungsplan von Krakau" Hans Frank as "the great builder of Cracow" The new residential quarter "Nur für Deutsche" The architectural heritage of the Third Reich in Cracow – a dissonant heritage? "Krakauer Burg" The Holocaust and places of memory 1 This article has been based on the research partially earlier presented in Polish, in a book: Jacek Purchla, Miasto i polityka.
    [Show full text]
  • Poland Study Guide Poland Study Guide
    Poland Study Guide POLAND STUDY GUIDE POLAND STUDY GUIDE Table of Contents Why Poland? In 1939, following a nonaggression agreement between the Germany and the Soviet Union known as the Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact, Poland was again divided. That September, Why Poland Germany attacked Poland and conquered the western and central parts of Poland while the Page 3 Soviets took over the east. Part of Poland was directly annexed and governed as if it were Germany (that area would later include the infamous Nazi concentration camp Auschwitz- Birkenau). The remaining Polish territory, the “General Government,” was overseen by Hans Frank, and included many areas with large Jewish populations. For Nazi leadership, Map of Territories Annexed by Third Reich the occupation was an extension of the Nazi racial war and Poland was to be colonized. Page 4 Polish citizens were resettled, and Poles who the Nazis deemed to be a threat were arrested and shot. Polish priests and professors were shot. According to historian Richard Evans, “If the Poles were second-class citizens in the General Government, then the Jews scarcely Map of Concentration Camps in Poland qualified as human beings at all in the eyes of the German occupiers.” Jews were subject to humiliation and brutal violence as their property was destroyed or Page 5 looted. They were concentrated in ghettos or sent to work as slave laborers. But the large- scale systematic murder of Jews did not start until June 1941, when the Germans broke 2 the nonaggression pact with the Soviets, invaded the Soviet-held part of Poland, and sent 3 Chronology of the Holocaust special mobile units (the Einsatzgruppen) behind the fighting units to kill the Jews in nearby forests or pits.
    [Show full text]
  • The Bureaucracy of Annihilation
    7 The Bureaucracy of Annihilation RAUL HILBERG We are, all of us who have thought and written about the Holocaust, accustomed to thinking of this event as unique. There is no concept in all history like the Final Solution. There is no precedent for the almost endless march of millions of men, women, and children into gas cham­ bers. The systematization of this destruction process sets it aside from all else that has ever happened. Yet if we examine this event in detail, ob~ serving the progression of small steps day by day, we see much in the destruction of Jewry that is familiar and even commonplace in the con­ text of contemporary institutions and practices. Basically, the Jews were destroyed as a consequence of a multitude of acts performed by a phalanx of functionaries in public offices and private enterprises, and many of 'these measures, taken one by one, tum out to be bureaucratic, embedded ih habit, routine, and tradition. It is almost a case of regarding the whole upheaval in all of its massiveness as something incredible, and then ob­ serving the small components and seeing in them very little that one could not expect in a modem society. One can go further and assert that it is the very mundaneness and ordinariness of these everyday official actions which made the destruction process so crass. Never before had the total experience of a modem bureaucracy been applied to such an undertaking. Never before had it produced such a result. 119 RAUL HILBERG The uprooting and annihilation of European Jewry was a multi, pronged operation of a highly decentralized apparatus.
    [Show full text]
  • 'Germanization' in Occupied Poland: Disunity, Inconsistency, And
    Mosher ‘Germanization’ in Occupied Poland: Disunity, Inconsistency, and Contradiction within the Nazi Administration. BEN MOSHER Following the invasion of Poland in September 1939, the Nazi’s began a program designed to Germanize the territory in which they occupied. The Germanization program involved reordering Polish society, and its people, according to the requirements of Nazi racial theory, thus bringing it in line with Hitler’s vision for the German Reich. However, Hitler’s grand vision for Poland was not implemented with any uniformity, and the Germanization program was plagued by internal inconsistency and contradiction from the outset. Drawing upon Ian Kershaw’s work, this paper will advance a reconceptualization of Hitler’s role as leader of the Nazi administration, emphasizing his characteristic detachment from the everyday functions of the Nazi bureaucracy. Instead of working from the dictates of their Fuehrer, Nazi officials worked to advance Hitler’s general vision with their own personalized policies. As a consequence, in Poland, the Germanization program varied tremendously according to the personal judgment of individual Nazi administrators. This point is illustrated through an analysis of Hitler’s laissez-faire brand of administrative rule, the autonomous competition that was cultivated amongst Nazi officials, and the ambiguities associated with the ‘racial status’ of the Polish population. This paper demonstrates that the fragmented nature of the Nazi Germanization program stems from Hitler’s non-interventionist brand of leadership, which afforded district officials with the administrative autonomy to enact his vision as they saw fit. On October 8, 1939, Adolf Hitler issued the Annexation Decree, officially commencing what would become a 6-year Nazi occupation of Polish territory.
    [Show full text]
  • Secondary Source Information
    Secondary Source Information From 1941 to 1945, German authorities transferred thousands of Lodz ghetto Jews to a number of forced labor and concentration camps and deported over 100,000 Jews from the Lodz ghetto to their deaths at the Chelmno and Auschwitz-Birkenau killing centers. The timeline and general histories below may provide valuable clues about specific camps and transports that included Jewish prisoners from the Lodz ghetto. TIMELINE OF TRANSPORTS INCLUDING LODZ GHETTO JEWS FEBRUARY 1940 – AUGUST 1944 ¾ Forced Labor Camps ¾ Chelmno ¾ Auschwitz AUGUST 1944 – MAY 1945 ¾ Bergen-Belsen ¾ Buchenwald ¾ Dachau ¾ Flossenbürg ¾ Gross-Rosen ¾ Mauthausen ¾ Natzweiler-Struthof ¾ Neuengamme ¾ Sachsenhausen ¾ Stutthof TIMELINE: Transports & Prisoner Registrations of Lodz ghetto Jews Size of Assigned Date Event From To Transport(s) Prisoner #'s Comments - 1942 - 14 Transports; Killed Jan. 16-29 Deportation Lodz Chelmno More than 10,000 in gas vans Approximately Feb. 22-28 Deportation Lodz Chelmno 7,025 Killed in gas vans March (daily) Deportation Lodz Chelmno More than 24,650 Killed in gas vans Approximately April 1-2 Deportation Lodz Chelmno 2,350 Killed in gas vans May 4-15 Deportation Lodz Chelmno More than 10,900 Killed in gas vans 298 people registered May 14 Arrival Lodz Auschwitz unknown 35363-35660 as prisoners 22 people registered July 15 Arrival Lodz Auschwitz unknown 46938-46959 as prisoners 19 people registered July 16 Arrival Lodz Auschwitz unknown 8726-8744 as prisoners Killed in gas vans; predominantly children under age 10, the elderly and Sept. 5-12 Deportation Lodz Chelmno More than 15,675 sick. 67759-67801, 43 men admitted, 19 Oct.
    [Show full text]
  • German Economic Policy and Forced Labor of Jews in the General Government, 1939–1943 Witold Wojciech Me¸Dykowski
    Macht Arbeit Frei? German Economic Policy and Forced Labor of Jews in the General Government, 1939–1943 Witold Wojciech Me¸dykowski Boston 2018 Jews of Poland Series Editor ANTONY POLONSKY (Brandeis University) Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data: the bibliographic record for this title is available from the Library of Congress. © Academic Studies Press, 2018 ISBN 978-1-61811-596-6 (hardcover) ISBN 978-1-61811-597-3 (electronic) Book design by Kryon Publishing Services (P) Ltd. www.kryonpublishing.com Academic Studies Press 28 Montfern Avenue Brighton, MA 02135, USA P: (617)782-6290 F: (857)241-3149 [email protected] www.academicstudiespress.com This publication is supported by An electronic version of this book is freely available, thanks to the support of libraries working with Knowledge Unlatched. KU is a collaborative initiative designed to make high quality books Open Access for the public good. The Open Access ISBN for this book is 978-1-61811-907-0. More information about the initiative and links to the Open Access version can be found at www.knowledgeunlatched.org. To Luba, with special thanks and gratitude Table of Contents Acknowledgements v Introduction vii Part One Chapter 1: The War against Poland and the Beginning of German Economic Policy in the Ocсupied Territory 1 Chapter 2: Forced Labor from the Period of Military Government until the Beginning of Ghettoization 18 Chapter 3: Forced Labor in the Ghettos and Labor Detachments 74 Chapter 4: Forced Labor in the Labor Camps 134 Part Two Chapter
    [Show full text]
  • Forced and Slave Labor in Nazi-Dominated Europe
    UNITED STATES HOLOCAUST MEMORIAL MUSEUM CENTER FOR ADVANCED HOLOCAUST STUDIES Forced and Slave Labor in Nazi-Dominated Europe Symposium Presentations W A S H I N G T O N , D. C. Forced and Slave Labor in Nazi-Dominated Europe Symposium Presentations CENTER FOR ADVANCED HOLOCAUST STUDIES UNITED STATES HOLOCAUST MEMORIAL MUSEUM 2004 The assertions, opinions, and conclusions in this occasional paper are those of the authors. They do not necessarily reflect those of the United States Holocaust Memorial Council or of the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum. First printing, April 2004 Copyright © 2004 by Peter Hayes, assigned to the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum; Copyright © 2004 by Michael Thad Allen, assigned to the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum; Copyright © 2004 by Paul Jaskot, assigned to the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum; Copyright © 2004 by Wolf Gruner, assigned to the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum; Copyright © 2004 by Randolph L. Braham, assigned to the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum; Copyright © 2004 by Christopher R. Browning, assigned to the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum; Copyright © 2004 by William Rosenzweig, assigned to the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum; Copyright © 2004 by Andrej Angrick, assigned to the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum; Copyright © 2004 by Sarah B. Farmer, assigned to the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum; Copyright © 2004 by Rolf Keller, assigned to the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum Contents Foreword ................................................................................................................................................i
    [Show full text]
  • The Holocaust (Shoah) (1939-1945)
    The Holocaust (Shoah) (1939-1945) This essay is not meant to be comprehensive. Rather, this is a narrative summary of my presentation. Holocaust historian Karl Schleunes wrote about the “Twisted Road to Auschwitz” that explored how the Nazis ended up building camps of mass murder. It is a useful description as it allows us to blend together some of the myriad forces acting together to create a “perfect storm.” As survivor Emil Fackenheim writes, “The murder camp was not an accidental by-product of the Nazi empire. It was its essence.” Nazi Germany was on a trajectory of mass murder and atrocity from its onset. The unfolding of genocides in Europe is a complex phenomenon, but for our purposes we will focus on: Nazi “ideology” and the bureaucratic, competitive, feudal nature of the Nazi state; process and innovation; Hitler’s function as leader and individual initiatives of “working towards the Führer”; the influence of the unfolding wartime situation; and the influence of location, specifically Eastern Europe. Ideology is not something that can be imposed “from the top.” Rather, ideology is a packaged expression of cultural symbols, desires, and perspectives that “make sense” to a public at large. Holocaust historian Doris Bergen sums up Nazi ideology with the phrase, “Race and Space.” Nazism was rooted in racial theory that had become popular within professional circles by the turn of the twentieth century. For the Nazis, “racial” survivor was predicated on a social Darwinist view of natural competition and survival. Not only was it necessary to weed out “threatening” gene pools from the “Aryan” it was also necessary for the “Aryan” to find living space or lebensraum.
    [Show full text]
  • Institute of National Remembrance
    Institute of National Remembrance https://ipn.gov.pl/en/news/4113,A-nation-of-murderers-or-some-victims-do-not-deserve-to-be-rememb ered.html 2021-10-02, 14:42 05.05.2020 A nation of murderers, or some victims do not deserve to be remembered. A review of Jan Grabowski's book "Na posterunku. Udział polskiej policji granatowej i kryminalnej w zagładzie Żydów" [At the post. The participation of the Polish Blue Police and Polish Criminal Police in the Extermination of Jews], Wydawnictwo Czarne, Wołowiec 2020. During a pandemic, issues such as historical publications become of secondary importance, giving way to other aspects of our social life. That is why the launch of Jan Grabowski's book Na posterunku. Udział polskiej policji granatowej i kryminalnej w zagładzie Żydów has gone by practically unnoticed. The author, who has been dealing with the subject of the Holocaust in Poland for years, is as well-known as he is controversial. His theses, concerning the conscious and voluntary participation of Poles in the Holocaust, presented in the book Judenjagd. Polowanie na Żydów 1942–1945. Studium dziejów pewnego powiatu (2011) and the collective work edited by him and Barbara Engelking Dalej jest noc. Losy Żydów w wybranych powiatach okupowanej Polski (2018) – have sparked off numerous disputes. The Blue Police in source materials This time the author has taken up the topic of the Polish Police in the General Government (the so-called Navy Blue Police, formally established by the Germans under the name Polnische Polizei im Generalgouvernement) and the Polish Criminal Police (Polnische Kriminalpolizei – the so-called Polish Kripo).
    [Show full text]