Wollschlager Thesis

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Wollschlager Thesis Nematocysts of the Invasive Species Cordylophora caspia THESIS Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Science in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Jennifer Wollschlager, B.S. Graduate Program in Evolution, Ecology and Organismal Biology The Ohio State University 2011 Master's Examination Committee: Meg Daly, Advisor John Freudenstein Norman Johnson Copyright by Jennifer Wollschlager 2011 Abstract Although there is significant genetic diversity within the hydroid Cordylophora caspia, the species has not been formally split into genetically defined distinct species. This is due in part to the physiological and morphological plasticity of C. caspia : all morphological characters used to distinguish species in Cordylophora are phenotypically plastic in this species and unreliable for classification. One potential source of characters not yet explored in C. caspia are nematocysts. Nematocysts have been widely used in taxonomy of Cnidaria, and in some cases, have a strong functional component and so may be subject to or correspond with ecotype. Elucidating the cnidom of lineages of C. caspia will help determine whether or not nematocysts are good indicators for different genetic lineages of this group, and whether nematocysts are functionally differentiated in populations from different habitats. A one-way ANOVA was used to determine if means between populations differed for euryteles or desmonemes, the two types of nematocysts found in C. caspia. Means between populations differed for euryteles (p<0.001) and desmonemes (p<0.001), although no correlation could be found between clade or salinity. This indicates that nematocysts within C. caspia are not phenotypically plastic or taxonomically informative. Nematocysts may be correlated to another environmental factor, such as prey type, size, and abundance in the location of each population. These morphological characters may still aid in distinguishing more distantly related species such as Cordylophora japonica. Further study of reproductive compatibility and ii morphometric features (e.g., branching pattern, hydrocaulus length) may provide some means of separating lineages in this cosmopolitan invasive species. iii Acknowledgments Thanks are due to Meg Daly, Paul Larson, Anthony D’Orazio, and Jennifer Yi for collection aid, Abby Reft for Scanning Electron Micrographs and collection aid, Nadine Folino-Rorem for providing animals, Meg Daly, Norman Johnson, and John Freudenstein for input on my thesis, and The Ohio State University. iv Vita May 2008…………………………..B.S. Marine Science, Biology Track, Eckerd College 2008 to present……………………..Graduate Teaching Associate, Department of Evolution, Ecology, and Organismal Biology, The Ohio State University Fields of Study Major Field: Evolution, Ecology and Organismal Biology v Table of Contents Abstract ............................................................................................................................... ii Acknowledgments............................................................................................................ ivv Vita ...................................................................................................................................... v List of Tables ................................................................................................................... viii List of Figures .................................................................................................................... ix Introduction ......................................................................................................................... 1 Diversity and Systematics of Cordylophora caspia ........................................................ 7 A Potential Solution for this Species Complex ............................................................. 12 Methods............................................................................................................................. 18 Sample Collection ......................................................................................................... 18 Nematocyst Measurement ............................................................................................. 18 DNA Extraction, Amplification, and Sequencing ......................................................... 20 Statistical Analysis of Nematocyst Sizes ...................................................................... 21 Results ............................................................................................................................... 23 Discussion ......................................................................................................................... 38 vi References ......................................................................................................................... 43 vii List of Tables Table 1. Amplification primers ........................................................................................ 21 Table 2. P-values from a one-way ANOVA testing between polyp averages ................. 24 Table 3. Summary of statistical groups............................................................................ 30 Table 4. Summary of eurytele data .................................................................................. 31 Table 5. Summary of desmoneme data ............................................................................ 37 viii List of Figures Figure 1. Sketch of a Cordylophora colony....................................................................... 2 Figure 2. Phylogenetic tree based on mtDNA ................................................................... 5 Figure 3. Global distribution of Cordylophora lineages .................................................... 6 Figure 4. Scanning electron microscope image of a discharged eurytele capsule ........... 15 Figure 5. Scanning electron microscope image of a discharged desmoneme capsule ..... 16 Figure 6. Stained euryteles and desmonemes .................................................................. 17 Figure 7. Normal quantile plot of residuals of euryteles ................................................. 26 Figure 8. Boxplot of eurytele lengths by polyp and population ...................................... 27 Figure 9. Boxplot of eurytele lengths by population ....................................................... 28 Figure 10. Boxplot of eurytele lengths by groups ............................................................. 29 Table 11. Normal quantile plot of residuals of desmonemes ........................................... 33 Table 12. Boxplot of desmoneme lengths by polyp and population................................ 34 Table 13. Boxplot of desmoneme lengths by population ................................................ 35 Table 14. Boxplot of desmoneme lengths by groups ....................................................... 36 ix Introduction The Ponto-Caspian invasive hydrozoan Cordylophora caspia is one of only a handful of cnidarians that live in fresh rather than marine waters (Janowski et al. 2008). It can tolerate a range of salinities, from brackish (~ 15 ‰) to freshwater, giving it a wide range of suitable habitat (reviewed in Roos 1979; Folino 2000). In a laboratory setting, C. caspia can survive at salinities as high as 30 ‰ (Kinne 1958). It is a clonal organism that also reproduces sexually, allowing it to be able to spread over substrate rapidly and spread planulae to new substrate locations. It grows by adding more hydranths to hydrocauli, the upright branches, or by extending the attached stolon (hydrorhiza) for more hydrocauli (Fig. 1) (Kinne 1958; Fulton 1962; Jormalainen et al. 1994). Gonophores, the reproductive structures, branch from the hydranths (Fig. 1) (Jormalainen et al. 1994). Cordylophora caspi a is often associated with zebra mussels ( Dreissena polymorpha ), another Ponto-Caspian invasive species, and, like D. polymorpha , it is also biofouling, causing industrial and ecological problems (Folino 2000; Musko et al. 2008). The spread of C. caspia is difficult to control because colonies are able to “die back” to structures called menonts, in which the tissue shrinks back into the stolon (Fig. 1). Menonts are ecologically resilient and allow a colony to survive stressful and changing environments, because a colony can regenerate from a menont when environmental 1 conditions are right (Roos 1979; Folino 2000). This diversity of growth and reproductive mechanisms and its broad salinity tolerance enhance the capacity of C. caspia to invade. Figure 1. A. Part of a Cordylophora colony with gastrozooids, female gonophores, and epiphauna. Scale is 5 mm. Camera lucida drawing (Roos 1979). B. A drawing of the anatomy of an upright stalk and hydrorhiza of Cordylophora (Folino 2000 re-drawn from Marcum and Dichl 1978). C. Menonts in hydrorhiza and base of hydrocaulus. Scale is 1 mm. Camera lucida drawing (Roos 1979). Although its success as an invader comes largely from being clonal and phenotypically plastic (Roman and Darling 2007), there is also evidence for multiple invasions of C. caspia into different localities throughout the world (Folino-Rorem et al. 2009). Multiple invasions greatly increase genetic diversity of the invader species in the new habitat, and thus are thought to increase invasion success (Roman and Darling 2007). Multiple invasions can even increase the genetic diversity of an invasive 2 population to higher
Recommended publications
  • Cordylophora Caspia (Pallas, 1771)
    Método de Evaluación Rápida de Invasividad (MERI) para especies exóticas en México Cordylophora caspia (Pallas, 1771) Cordylophora caspia (Pallas, 1771) Foto: Horia R. Galea Fuente: WoRMS taxa. Cordylophora caspia es una importante fuente animal de ensuciamiento y atasco de sistemas industriales de refrigeración de agua. Compite con especies nativas por espacio y alimento. Grandes colonias densas pueden modificar los hábitats bentónicos, provocando cambios estructurales en las comunidades pelárgicas y bentónicas (MAAMA, 2013). Información taxonómica Reino: Animalia Phylum: Cnidaria Clase: Hydrozoa Orden: Anthoathecata Familia: Cordylophoridae Género: Cordylophora Especie: Cordylophora caspia (Pallas, 1771) Nombre común: Hidroide esturialino, freshwater hydroid, euryhaline hydroid. Resultado: 0.5281 Categoría de riesgo: Muy alto 1 Método de Evaluación Rápida de Invasividad (MERI) para especies exóticas en México Cordylophora caspia (Pallas, 1771) Descripción de la especie Hidroide colonial de color marrón claro, que puede alcanzar hasta 10 cm de altura. La colonia puede tener ramificaciones ocasionalmente por lados alternativos; las ramas están rodeadas en la base y tiene pólipos terminales, de color blanquecino o rosa pálido, con tentáculos incoloros, en número de 12 a 16, repartidos irregularmente sobre la superficie del pólipo. La boca nace en una probóscide cónica pero truncada. Cada rama tiene órganos reproductivos en número de uno a tres, en forma de pera de tallos cortos (MAAMA, 2013). Distribución original Región Ponto-Caspiana
    [Show full text]
  • Summary Report of Nonindigenous Aquatic Species in U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Region 5
    Summary Report of Nonindigenous Aquatic Species in U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Region 5 Summary Report of Nonindigenous Aquatic Species in U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Region 5 Prepared by: Amy J. Benson, Colette C. Jacono, Pam L. Fuller, Elizabeth R. McKercher, U.S. Geological Survey 7920 NW 71st Street Gainesville, Florida 32653 and Myriah M. Richerson Johnson Controls World Services, Inc. 7315 North Atlantic Avenue Cape Canaveral, FL 32920 Prepared for: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service 4401 North Fairfax Drive Arlington, VA 22203 29 February 2004 Table of Contents Introduction ……………………………………………………………………………... ...1 Aquatic Macrophytes ………………………………………………………………….. ... 2 Submersed Plants ………...………………………………………………........... 7 Emergent Plants ………………………………………………………….......... 13 Floating Plants ………………………………………………………………..... 24 Fishes ...…………….…………………………………………………………………..... 29 Invertebrates…………………………………………………………………………...... 56 Mollusks …………………………………………………………………………. 57 Bivalves …………….………………………………………………........ 57 Gastropods ……………………………………………………………... 63 Nudibranchs ………………………………………………………......... 68 Crustaceans …………………………………………………………………..... 69 Amphipods …………………………………………………………….... 69 Cladocerans …………………………………………………………..... 70 Copepods ……………………………………………………………….. 71 Crabs …………………………………………………………………...... 72 Crayfish ………………………………………………………………….. 73 Isopods ………………………………………………………………...... 75 Shrimp ………………………………………………………………….... 75 Amphibians and Reptiles …………………………………………………………….. 76 Amphibians ……………………………………………………………….......... 81 Toads and Frogs
    [Show full text]
  • Aquatic Nuisance Species Management Plan
    NORTH CAROLINA ria ut N e Mystery er Prim es S Wat ros in na e Ch il Aquatic ish F on Nuisance Li rn Sna Species Nor the kehead Marbled Cray fish Hydrill a h Spo fis tted Jelly MANAGEMENT PLAN NORTH CAROLINA AQUATIC NUISANCE SPECIES MANAGEMENT PLAN Prepared by the NC Aquatic Nuisance Species Management Plan Committee October 1, 2015 Approved by: Steve Troxler, Commissioner North Carolina Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services Donald R. van der Vaart, Secretary North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality Gordon Myers, Executive Director North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission TABLE OF CONTENTS Acknowledgements Executive Summary I. Introduction .....................................................................................................................................................................................................................1 The difference between Aquatic Invasive Species (AIS) and Aquatic Nuisance Species (ANS) ................................................................5 Plan Purpose, Scope and Development ............................................................................................................................................................................. 5 Aquatic Invasive Species Vectors and Impacts ............................................................................................................................................................... 6 Interactions with Other Plan ................................................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • CNIDARIA Corals, Medusae, Hydroids, Myxozoans
    FOUR Phylum CNIDARIA corals, medusae, hydroids, myxozoans STEPHEN D. CAIRNS, LISA-ANN GERSHWIN, FRED J. BROOK, PHILIP PUGH, ELLIOT W. Dawson, OscaR OcaÑA V., WILLEM VERvooRT, GARY WILLIAMS, JEANETTE E. Watson, DENNIS M. OPREsko, PETER SCHUCHERT, P. MICHAEL HINE, DENNIS P. GORDON, HAMISH J. CAMPBELL, ANTHONY J. WRIGHT, JUAN A. SÁNCHEZ, DAPHNE G. FAUTIN his ancient phylum of mostly marine organisms is best known for its contribution to geomorphological features, forming thousands of square Tkilometres of coral reefs in warm tropical waters. Their fossil remains contribute to some limestones. Cnidarians are also significant components of the plankton, where large medusae – popularly called jellyfish – and colonial forms like Portuguese man-of-war and stringy siphonophores prey on other organisms including small fish. Some of these species are justly feared by humans for their stings, which in some cases can be fatal. Certainly, most New Zealanders will have encountered cnidarians when rambling along beaches and fossicking in rock pools where sea anemones and diminutive bushy hydroids abound. In New Zealand’s fiords and in deeper water on seamounts, black corals and branching gorgonians can form veritable trees five metres high or more. In contrast, inland inhabitants of continental landmasses who have never, or rarely, seen an ocean or visited a seashore can hardly be impressed with the Cnidaria as a phylum – freshwater cnidarians are relatively few, restricted to tiny hydras, the branching hydroid Cordylophora, and rare medusae. Worldwide, there are about 10,000 described species, with perhaps half as many again undescribed. All cnidarians have nettle cells known as nematocysts (or cnidae – from the Greek, knide, a nettle), extraordinarily complex structures that are effectively invaginated coiled tubes within a cell.
    [Show full text]
  • First Record of Cordylophora Caspia (Hydrozoa: Cnidaria) in the Tagus Estuary, Central Portugal Anxo Conde1,2, Jorge Domi’Nguez2,Ju’ Lio M
    Marine Biodiversity Records, page 1 of 6. # Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 2013 doi:10.1017/S1755267213000833; Vol. 6; e114; 2013 Published online First record of Cordylophora caspia (Hydrozoa: Cnidaria) in the Tagus estuary, central Portugal anxo conde1,2, jorge domi’nguez2,ju’ lio m. novais1,† and fran ramil2 1IBB—Institute for Biotechnology and Bioengineering, Center for Biological and Chemical Engineering, Instituto Superior Te´cnico (IST), 1049-001 Lisbon, Portugal, 2Departamento de Ecoloxı´a e Bioloxı´a Animal, Universidade de Vigo, Vigo E-36310, Spain, †Deceased The Ponto-Caspian hydroid Cordylophora caspia has been found for the first time in the Tagus estuary. There is only one previous citation for this invasive species in Portuguese waters. The colonies of C. caspia were branched and had healthy gas- trozooids and gonophores. The specimens were collected from a saline boundary zone characterized by high fluctuations in salinity (maximum of 15.3 and minimum of 0.2) and high suspended solids loading. Cordylophora caspia is capable of colo- nizing man-made infrastructures such as industrial facilities and can inhabit both brackish and freshwater environments. These features of C. caspia, together with its resilience when in a dormant stage (menonts), indicate that the monitoring of this invasive species is advisable in the Tagus estuary. Keywords: Cordylophora caspia, invasive species, salinity, turbidity, Iberian Peninsula Submitted 14 May 2013; accepted 14 September 2013 INTRODUCTION adjustments that enable it to live in soft water of low alkalinity (Smith et al., 2002), in agreement with the alternative proposal The Ponto-Caspian invasive species Cordylophora caspia of Hutchinson (1993) and against Arndt’s (1984)prediction.
    [Show full text]
  • Pathways for Non-Native Species in Denmark
    department of geosciences and natural resource management university of copenhagen department of geosciences and natural resource management universitety of copenhagen rolighedsvej 23 DK-1958 frederiksberg c tel. +45 3533 1500 www.ign.ku.dk Pathways for non-native species in Denmark Corrie Lynne Madsen, Christina Marita Dahl, Karen Bruun Thirslund, Fabienne Grousset, Vivian Kvist Johannsen and Hans Peter Ravn IGN Report April 2014 Title Pathways for non-native species in Denmark Authors Corrie Lynne Madsen, Christina Marita Dahl, Karen Bruun Thirslund, Fabienne Grousset, Vivian Kvist Johannsen and Hans Peter Ravn Citation Madsen, C. L., Dahl, C. M., Thirslund, K. B., Grousset, F., Johannsen, V. K. and Ravn, H. P. (2014): Pathways for non-native species in Denmark. Department of Geosciences and Natural Resource Management, University of Copenha- gen, Frederiksberg. 131 pp. Publisher Department of Geosciences and Natural Resource Management University of Copenhagen Rolighedsvej 23 DK-1958 Frederiksberg C Tel. +45 3533 1500 [email protected] www.ign.ku.dk Responsible under the press law Niels Elers Koch ISBN 978-87-7903-656-7 Cover Karin Kristensen Cover Photos Hans Ulrik Riisgård Hans Peter Ravn Jonas Roulund Published This report is only published at www.ign.ku.dk Citation allowed with clear source indication Written permission is required if you wish to use the name of the institute and/or part of this report for sales and advertising purposes 1. Preface This report is a collaboration between the Danish Nature Agency and Department for Geosciences and Natural Resource Management, University of Copenhagen. It is an update and analysis of knowledge on introduction pathways for non‐native species into Denmark in order to meet the demands for common efforts addressing challenges from alien invasive species.
    [Show full text]
  • A New Species of Pachycordyle (Hydrozoa, Clavidae) from Lake Biwa (Japan), with Remarks on This and Related Clavid Genera*
    SCI. MAR., 64 (Supl. 1): 225-236 SCIENTIA MARINA 2000 TRENDS IN HYDROZOAN BIOLOGY - IV. C.E. MILLS, F. BOERO, A. MIGOTTO and J.M. GILI (eds.) A new species of Pachycordyle (Hydrozoa, Clavidae) from Lake Biwa (Japan), with remarks on this and related Clavid genera* SOFIA D. STEPANJANTS1, OLEG A. TIMOSHKIN2, 3, BORIS A. ANOKHIN1 and TATIANA O. NAPARA4 1Zoological Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 199034 St.Petersburg, Russia. 2Center for Ecological Research, Kyoto Universitat. 509-3 Otsuka Kamai-Tanakami Otsu 520-2113, Japan. 3Limnological Institute of the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Ul. Ulan-Batorskaya, 3, P.O.Box 4199, 664033 Irkutsk, Russia. 4Institute of Cytology of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 194064 St.Petersburg, Russia. SUMMARY: The history of research on species of Pachycordyle and related genera is discussed. A description and differ- ential diagnosis of a new species, Pachycordyle kubotai, is presented. Hydroid colonies, hydranths, and gonophores of this species are described in detail. Peculiarities of medusoid development and oocyte maturation are analyzed. The genus Pachycordyle is rediagnosed and an identification key to species assigned to it is provided. Clavopsella is regarded as con- generic with Pachycordyle. Thieliana is established as a new genus for species subsequently and erroneously assigned to Clavopsella. The taxonomic status of species referable to Thieliana is discussed. Justification is provided for our position that these genera belong to the family Clavidae. Characteristics of genera assigned to the family Clavidae are summarized. Data on the geographic distribution and ecology of the species of Cordylophora, Pachycordyle, and Thieliana, referred here to the subfamily Cordylophorinae, are presented.
    [Show full text]
  • International Conference on Aquatic Invasive Species
    FINAL PROGRAM Global Action Against Aquatic Invasive Species October 22-26, 2017 Marriott Coral Springs Fort Lauderdale, Florida th 20International Conference on Aquatic Invasive Species Host Conference Secretariat ICAIS Steering Committee Tracey Cooke Lyn Gettys Conference Secretariat Chair, Technical Program Committee Executive Director, Invasive Species Centre University of Florida IFAS Center for Aquatic and Invasive Plants Technical Program Committee Sarah Bailey Sophie Monfette Fisheries and Oceans Canada Ontario Federation of Anglers and Hunters Becky Cudmore Alison Morris Fisheries and Oceans Canada Ontario Federation of Anglers and Hunters Erika Jensen Jeff Brinsmead Great Lakes Commission Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry Jill Wingfield Stephen Phillips Great Lakes Fishery Commission Pacific States Marine Fisheries Commission Frances Lucy Jaimie T.A. Dick Institute of Technology, Sligo Queen's University Belfast Glenn Benoy Rob Leuven International Joint Commission Radboud University Nijmegen Rebecca Schroeder Renata Claudi Invasive Species Centre RNT Consulting Deb Sparks Douglas Jensen Invasive Species Centre University of Minnesota Sea Grant Program Lauren Tonelli Al Cofrancesco Invasive Species Centre U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Gail Wallin Linda Nelson Invasive Species Council of B.C. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Conference Administrator Elizabeth Muckle-Jeffs The Professional Edge Toll Free (North America) 1-800-868-8776 International: 613-732-7068 E: [email protected] Web: www.icais.org
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental Heterogeneity and Benthic Macroinvertebrate Guilds in Italian Lagoons Alberto Basset, Nicola Galuppo & Letizia Sabetta
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by ESE - Salento University Publishing Transitional Waters Bulletin TWB, Transit. Waters Bull. 1(2006), 48-63 ISSN 1825-229X, DOI 10.1285/i1825226Xv1n1p48 http://siba2.unile.it/ese/twb Environmental heterogeneity and benthic macroinvertebrate guilds in italian lagoons Alberto Basset, Nicola Galuppo & Letizia Sabetta Department of Biological and Environmental Sciences and Technologies University of Salento S.P. Lecce-Monteroni 73100 Lecce RESEARCH ARTICLE ITALY Abstract 1 - Lagoons are ecotones between freshwater, marine and terrestrial biotopes, characterized by internal ecosystem heterogeneity, due to patchy spatial and temporal distribution of biotic and abiotic components, and inter-ecosystem heterogeneity, due to the various terrestrial-freshwater and freshwater-marine interfaces. 2 - Here, we carried out an analysis of environmental heterogeneity and benthic macro-invertebrate guilds in a sample of 26 Italian lagoons based on literature produced over a 25 year period.. 3 - In all, 944 taxonomic units, belonging to 13 phyla, 106 orders and 343 families, were recorded. Most species had a very restricted geographic distribution range. 75% of the macroinvertebrate taxa were observed in less than three of the twenty-six lagoons considered. 4 - Similarity among macroinvertebrate guilds in lagoon ecosystems was remarkably low, ranging from 10.5%±7.5% to 34.2%±14.4% depending on the level of taxonomic resolution. 5 - Taxonomic heterogeneity was due to both differences in species richness and to differences in species composition: width of seaward outlet, lagoon surface area and water salinity were the most important factors affecting species richness, together accounting for up to 75% of observed inter-lagoon heterogeneity, while distance between lagoons was the most significant factor affecting similarity of species composition.
    [Show full text]
  • Working Group on Introductions and Transfers of Marine Organisms (WGITMO)
    ICES Advisory Committee on the Marine Environment ICES CM 2004/ACME:05 Ref. E, G Report of the Working Group on Introductions and Transfers of Marine Organisms (WGITMO) 25–26 March 2004 Cesenatico, Italy This report is not to be quoted without prior consultation with the General Secretary. The document is a report of an Expert Group under the auspices of the International Council for the Exploration of the Sea and does not necessarily represent the views of the Council. TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Page 1 OPENING OF THE MEETING AND INTRODUCTION........................................................................................ 1 2 TERMS OF REFERENCE, ADOPTION OF AGENDA, SELECTION OF RAPPORTEUR .................................. 1 2.1 Terms of Reference......................................................................................................................................... 1 2.2 Status of the terms of references ..................................................................................................................... 1 2.3 Adoption of the Agenda.................................................................................................................................. 2 2.4 Selection of Rapporteur .................................................................................................................................. 2 3 REVIEW OF THE 2003 WGITMO REPORT........................................................................................................... 2 4 DISCUSSION PAPER OF THE EUROPEAN
    [Show full text]
  • Current and Potential Aquatic Invasive Species in Ontario and the Great Lakes Region: a Compilation of Ecological Information
    Science and Research Information Report IR-16 Current and potential aquatic invasive species in Ontario and the Great Lakes region: A compilation of ecological information Science and Research Information Report IR-16 Current and potential aquatic invasive species in Ontario and the Great Lakes region: A compilation of ecological information Elizabeth C. Hatton1, Jeffrey D. Buckley1, Shannon A. Fera1,2, Samantha Henry1, Len M. Hunt3, D. Andrew R. Drake4 and Timothy B. Johnson1 1 Aquatic Research and Development Section, Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry (MNRF), 41 Hatchery Lane, Picton, ON K0K 2T0 2 Current address: Fisheries Section, Species Conservation Policy Branch, MNRF, 300 Water Street, Peterborough, ON K9J 8M5 3 Centre for Northern Forest Ecosystem Research, MNRF, 103-421 James St S, Thunder Bay, ON P7E 2V6 4 Great Lakes Laboratory for Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, Fisheries and Oceans Canada, 867 Lakeshore Road, Burlington, ON L7S 1A1 2019 Science and Research Branch Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry © 2019, Queen’s Printer for Ontario Copies of this publication are available from [email protected]. Cette publication hautement spécialisée, Current and Potential Aquatic Invasive Species in Ontario and the Great Lakes Region: A Compilation of Ecological Information, n’est disponible qu’en anglais conformément au Règlement 671/92, selon lequel il n’est pas obligatoire de la traduire en vertu de la Loi sur les services en français. Pour obtenir des renseignements en français, veuillez communiquer avec le ministère des Richesses naturelles et des Forêts au [email protected]. Some of the information in this document may not be compatible with assistive technologies.
    [Show full text]
  • Puget Sound Expedition
    Report of the Puget Sound Expedition September 8-16, 1998 A Rapid Assessment Survey of Non-indigenous Species in the Shallow Waters of Puget Sound Prepared by Andrew Cohen, Claudia Mills, Helen Berry, Marjorie Wonham, Brian Bingham, Betty Bookheim, James Carlton, John Chapman, Jeff Cordell, Leslie Harris, Terrie Klinger, Alan Kohn, Charles Lambert, Gretchen Lambert, Kevin Li, David Secord and Jason Toft For the Washington State Department of Natural Resources, Olympia, WA United States Fish and Wildlife Service, Lacey, WA November 1998 For additional copies of this report, contact: Nearshore Habitat Program Aquatic Resources Division Washington State Department of Natural Resources 1111 Washington Street SE PO Box 47027 Olympia, WA 98504-7027 (360) 902-1100 Report of the Puget Sound Expedition Sept. 8-16, 1998 Contents Summary .............................................................................................................1 Methods...............................................................................................................2 Non-indigenous Species Collected.......................................................................5 Future Research and Reports, Research Needs...................................................17 Acknowledgments .............................................................................................18 Literature Cited..................................................................................................19 Tables 1 Non-indigenous and Cryptogenic Species Collected .....................................6
    [Show full text]