13Th International Conference on Aquatic Invasive Species

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

13Th International Conference on Aquatic Invasive Species 13th International Conference on Aquatic Invasive Species HOSTED BY September 20 to 24, 2004 Lynch West County Hotel Ennis, County Clare, Ireland Conference Host Institute of Technology, Sligo, Ballinode, Sligo, Ireland Honourary Conference Co-Chairs Pat the Cope Gallagher, Minister of State, Department of Environment and Local Government, Ireland Timothy R.E. Keeney, Deputy Assistant Secretary of Commerce for Oceans and Atmosphere, USA John Cooley, Regional Director General, Fisheries and Oceans Canada, Canada Technical Programme Committee Chair: Frances Lucy, Institute of Technology, Sligo Past Chair: Beth MacKay, Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources Renata Claudi, RNT Consulting Inc., Emeritus Dan Minchin, Marine Organism Investigations Charles Boylen, Darrin Fresh Water Institute Robert Hester, Ontario Power Generation Ron Pierce, Fisheries and Oceans Canada Dennis Wright, Fisheries and Oceans Canada Francine MacDonald, Ontario Federation of Anglers and Hunters Sharon Gross, US Geological Survey Bivan Patnaik, US Coast Guard Stephen McElvany, US Office of Naval Research Margaret Dochoda, Great Lakes Fishery Commission Glenn Rhett, US Army Engineer Research & Development Center David F. Reid, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) Pam Thibodeaux, US Fish & Wildlife Service Contents Conference Program . i MONDAY SEPTEMBER 20 International Cooperation Towards Science, Policy and Information Exchange Vectors, Detectors and Inspectors . 1 Dan Minchin, Marine Organism Investigations, Ireland Managing the Global Invasive Species Problem – Some Lessons Learned From Experience with National, Regional and Global Programmes . 2 Greg Sherley, Principal Regional Scientist, New Zealand Department of Conservation, New Zealand Invasive Aquatic Species and Ships Across the Sea – the IMO Response, Reflections and Direction. 3 Jean-Claude Sainlos, Director, Marine Environment Division, International Maritime Organization, England Two Nations, One Ecosystem, Working Together on Aquatic Invasive Species Management and Control . 5 The Rt. Hon. Herb Gray, Chair, Canadian Section, and The Hon. Dennis Schornack, Chair, United States, International Joint Commission Directions in Policy and Action on Aquatic Invasive Species in the United States. 6 Timothy R.E. Keeney, Deputy Assistant Secretary of Commerce for Oceans and Atmosphere, NOAA Integrating Science With Policy: The Canadian Experience . 7 John Cooley, Regional Director General, Fisheries and Oceans Canada, Canada Invasive Species in Ireland . 8 Jamie T.A. Dick, Quercus, Queen’s University, Belfast, Northern Ireland Introduced Aquatic Species in Europe — An Attempt at an Inventory . 9 Stephan Gollasch, GoConsult, Germany Aquatic Species Introduced in Europe – An Attempt at an Inventory . 10 Charles L. Griffiths, University of Cape Town, South Africa Post-border Management of Non-native Marine Species in New Zealand. 11 Maria Cassidy, Ministry of Fisheries, New Zealand The Aquatic Nuisance Species Task Force: A Mechanism to Coordinate Efforts to Combat Aquatic Nuisance Species in Order to Protect US Waters . 12 Everett Wilson, US Fish & Wildlife Service, Aquatic Nuisance Species Task Force, Executive Secretary, USA European Cooperation in Research, Information Exchange and Management of Aquatic Invasive Species . 13 Vadim Panov, Zoological Institute of the Russian Academy of Science, Russia Shipping: Updates on the Issues A Global Perspective on Shipping as a Vector for New Introductions . 14 Stephan Gollasch, Go Consult, Germany, Invited Bioinvasions in North America’s Great Lakes and the Shipping Vector . 15 Edward L. Mills, Cornell University, USA Vectors for Introduction of Alien Macroalgae in Europe: Hull Fouling . 16 Frédéric Mineur, Queen's University Belfast, Northern Ireland Quantifying the Efficacy of Mid-ocean Ballast Water Exchange: An Experimental Approach . 17 Emma Verling, Smithsonian Environmental Research Center, USA Ballast Water Management: Toward Understanding Treatment Efficacy . 18 Gregory M. Ruiz, Smithsonian Environmental Research Center, USA Shipping: Advances in Science Modeling of Ballast Water Flow Dynamics to Understand Ballast Water Exchange . 20 Stephan Verosto, Naval Sea Systems Command Carderock, Surface Warfare Center Division, USA Transfer of Nonindigenous Species to the Laurentian Great Lakes in Residual Ballast Water From No-ballast-on-board (NOBOB) Vessels . 21 Colin D.A. van Overdijk, Great Lakes Institute for Environmental Research, University of Windsor, Canada Modeling the Risk of Invasion by Diapausing Eggs in Residual Ballast Sediments. 22 Sarah A. Bailey, Great Lakes Institute for Environmental Research, University of Windsor, Canada Viability of Invertebrate Diapausing Eggs Exposed to Saltwater: Implications for Great Lakes’ Ship Ballast Management . 23 Derek K. Gray, Great Lakes Institute for Environmental Research, University of Windsor, Canada Biology of Invading Fishes The Spread of Dace – an Invasive Fish Species in Ireland . 24 Brian Hayden, Central Fisheries Board, Ireland Preliminary Results on the Movements and Microhabitat Use of Introduced Pumpkinseed (Lepomis gibbosus) in Small English Streams . 25 Salius Stakenas, Centre for Environment, Fisheries & Aquatic Science (CEFAS), England Risk Assessment of Introduced Black Carp in the United States: Potential Geographic Range and Ecological Impacts . 26 Leo G. Nico and Howard L. Jelks, US Geological Survey, FISC – Center for Aquatic Resources Studies Invasive Freshwater Fish and Water Clarity Decline in New Zealand, North Island Lakes . 27 David Rowe, National Institute for Water and Atmospheric Research, New Zealand Aquatic Invasive Species Impacts Upon the Lake Erie Sport Fishery. 28 Fred L. Snyder, Ohio Sea Grant, USA Complex Interactions Between Native and Invasive Fish: The Simultaneous Effects of Multiple Negative Interactions . 29 Russell Rader, Brigham Young University, USA Occurrence of an Introduced Freshwater Fish, the Rio Grande Cichlid (Cichlasoma cyanoguttatum), in Estuarine Habitats of Southeastern Louisiana, USA: Can We Assume That Estuaries are Effective Barriers to Expansion?. 30 Martin T. O'Connell, University of New Orleans, USA Early Life Interactions Between Native Cyprinids and Invasive Sunbleak Leucaspius deliniatus in a Three-lake System . 31 Kathleen Beyer, University of Hull, England Heterosporis Sp. (Microspora): A New Parasite From Yellow Perch (Perca flavescens) And Walleye (Stizostedion vitreum) In Minnesota, Wisconsin and Lake Ontario, North America . 32 Dan Sutherland, University of Wisconsin - La Crosse, USA Global Management Efforts Guilty Until Proven Innocent or Innocent Until Proven Guilty? The Further Development of Criteria for Assigning Introduced versus Endemic Status . 33 Marnie Campbell, Ministry of Fisheries, New Zealand Guilty Until Proven Innocent or Innocent Until Proven Guilty? The Practical Biosecurity Management of Cryptogenic Species . 34 Chad Hewitt, Ministry of Fisheries, New Zealand Italian Project on Aquatic Invasive Species in Italian Seas . 35 Franco Andaloro, Central Institute of Research Applied to the Sea (ICRAM), Italy The Proposed Australian System for the Prevention and Management of Marine Pest Incursions . 36 Jacinta Innes, Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forests, Australia Status, Environmental Considerations for Invasive Seaweads for the Pacific Coast of North America. 37 Hans Herrmann, Commission for Environmental Cooperation of North America Prediction Modeling and Risk Assessment Developing Technologies for AIS Risk Assessment for US Army Corps of Engineers Projects . 38 Alfred F. Cofrancesco, Jr., US Army Engineer Research & Development Center, USA Life-history Variation and the Spread of Aquatic Nonindigenous Species Across Ontario Lakes . 39 Jim Muirhead, Great Lakes Institute, University of Windsor, Canada Emerging Threats: Potential Geographic Distributions of Temperate Aquatic Invasive Species . 40 Daniel A. Kluza, US Environmental Protection Agency, USA Watershed Characteristics and Nonindigenous Fish in Mid-Atlantic Streams . 41 Michael W. Slimak, US Environmental Protection Agency, USA Shipping: Advances in Science US Coast Guard Shipboard Technology Evaluation Program . 42 Richard Everett, US Coast Guard, USA The US Ballast Water Technology Demonstration Program: Progress Report . 43 Pamela Thibodeaux, US Fish & Wildlife Service, USA Evaluation of Filtration Components for Ballast Water Treatment . 44 Edward J. Lemieux, Naval Research Laboratory, USA Evaluation of a New Method for Control of Aquatic Invasive Species: Effects of Carbon Dioxide and Stack Gas Supersaturation on LT50. 45 Barnaby J. Watten, US Geological Survey, USA Rapid Deoxygenation of Ballast Water: Effectiveness and Applicability of a Bio-reactive Process . 46 Yves de Lafontaine, Environment Canada, Canada Treatment of Ships’ Ballast Water Using the Strong Dielectric Barrier Discharge . 47 Mingdong Bai, Dalian Maritime University, China Development, Verification and Installation of Electro-ionization Technology for Ballast Water Treatment on a Cruise Ship . 48 C.E. Bud Leffler, Marine Environmental Partners, USA Engineered Biomimetic Surfaces to Reduce Ulva Zoospore Settlement . 50 Anthony Brennan, University of Florida, USA Acute Toxicity of SeaKleen (Menadione) to Zooplankton Diapausing Eggs . 51 David Raikow, NOAA, Great Lakes Environmental Research Laboratory, USA Development of Full-Scale Ballast Water Treatment Systems for the Control of Aquatic Nuisance Species. 52 Tom Mackey, Hyde Marine Inc. Design
Recommended publications
  • Christine Joyce I I ~ Io From: Janet K Adachi [[email protected]] Sent: Thursday, November 11,20106:54 PM To: Christine Joyce Cc: Lauren Rosenzweig Morton
    Page 1 of 1 Christine Joyce I I ~ iO From: Janet K Adachi [[email protected]] Sent: Thursday, November 11,20106:54 PM To: Christine Joyce Cc: Lauren Rosenzweig Morton Subject: BOS Consent Agenda - Conservation Commission appointment Hi, Christine, Would you add to the consent agenda, for the 11/22 meeting, the appointment of Amy Green as Conservation Commissioner? Commission Chairman Terry Maitland, Natural Resources Director Tom Tidman and Commissioner Andy Magee--who has worked with her on projects--support her appointment. I also met and talked with Ms. Green this morning during the Commission’s walk of the Wetherbee Land forest (for which the Town must develop a forest management plan). Thanks. Janet Original Message From: Christine Joyce To: Janet Adachi Sent: Tuesday, November 09, 2010 12:40 PM Subject: FW:Cons corn applicant for processing Original Message From: [email protected] [mailto:ATH-MGR-COPIER©acton-ma.gov] Sent: Tuesday, November 09, 2010 12:43 PM To: Christine Joyce Subject: Scan from a Xerox WorkCentre Please open the attached document. It was scanned and sent to you using a Xerox multifunction device. Attachment File Type: pdf multifunction device Location: machine location not set Device Name: ATH-MGR-COPIER For more information on Xerox products and solutions, please visit http://www.xerox.com 11/12/2010 Jc~\e~\s~— The Volunteer Coordinating Committee met November 8, 2010 and interviewedVèoLtrt~.Amy ~\cri’\ Green for an opening on the Conservation Committee. She is a certified Professional Wetland Scientist but does not do any consulting within the Town ofActon.
    [Show full text]
  • Development of Species-Specific Edna-Based Test Systems For
    REPORT SNO 7544-2020 Development of species-specific eDNA-based test systems for monitoring of non-indigenous Decapoda in Danish marine waters © Henrik Carl, Natural History Museum, Denmark History © Henrik Carl, Natural NIVA Denmark Water Research REPORT Main Office NIVA Region South NIVA Region East NIVA Region West NIVA Denmark Gaustadalléen 21 Jon Lilletuns vei 3 Sandvikaveien 59 Thormøhlensgate 53 D Njalsgade 76, 4th floor NO-0349 Oslo, Norway NO-4879 Grimstad, Norway NO-2312 Ottestad, Norway NO-5006 Bergen Norway DK 2300 Copenhagen S, Denmark Phone (47) 22 18 51 00 Phone (47) 22 18 51 00 Phone (47) 22 18 51 00 Phone (47) 22 18 51 00 Phone (45) 39 17 97 33 Internet: www.niva.no Title Serial number Date Development of species-specific eDNA-based test systems for monitoring 7544-2020 22 October 2020 of non-indigenous Decapoda in Danish marine waters Author(s) Topic group Distribution Steen W. Knudsen and Jesper H. Andersen – NIVA Denmark Environmental monitor- Public Peter Rask Møller – Natural History Museum, University of Copenhagen ing Geographical area Pages Denmark 54 Client(s) Client's reference Danish Environmental Protection Agency (Miljøstyrelsen) UCB and CEKAN Printed NIVA Project number 180280 Summary We report the development of seven eDNA-based species-specific test systems for monitoring of marine Decapoda in Danish marine waters. The seven species are 1) Callinectes sapidus (blå svømmekrabbe), 2) Eriocheir sinensis (kinesisk uldhånds- krabbe), 3) Hemigrapsus sanguineus (stribet klippekrabbe), 4) Hemigrapsus takanoi (pensel-klippekrabbe), 5) Homarus ameri- canus (amerikansk hummer), 6) Paralithodes camtschaticus (Kamchatka-krabbe) and 7) Rhithropanopeus harrisii (østameri- kansk brakvandskrabbe).
    [Show full text]
  • The Role of Neaxius Acanthus
    Wattenmeerstation Sylt The role of Neaxius acanthus (Thalassinidea: Strahlaxiidae) and its burrows in a tropical seagrass meadow, with some remarks on Corallianassa coutierei (Thalassinidea: Callianassidae) Diplomarbeit Institut für Biologie / Zoologie Fachbereich Biologie, Chemie und Pharmazie Freie Universität Berlin vorgelegt von Dominik Kneer Angefertigt an der Wattenmeerstation Sylt des Alfred-Wegener-Instituts für Polar- und Meeresforschung in der Helmholtz-Gemeinschaft In Zusammenarbeit mit dem Center for Coral Reef Research der Hasanuddin University Makassar, Indonesien Sylt, Mai 2006 1. Gutachter: Prof. Dr. Thomas Bartolomaeus Institut für Biologie / Zoologie Freie Universität Berlin Berlin 2. Gutachter: Prof. Dr. Walter Traunspurger Fakultät für Biologie / Tierökologie Universität Bielefeld Bielefeld Meinen Eltern (wem sonst…) Table of contents 4 Abstract ...................................................................................................................................... 6 Zusammenfassung...................................................................................................................... 8 Abstrak ..................................................................................................................................... 10 Abbreviations ........................................................................................................................... 12 1 Introduction ..........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Fisheries (Southland and Sub-Antarctic Areas Commercial Fishing) Regulations 1986 (SR 1986/220)
    Reprint as at 1 October 2017 Fisheries (Southland and Sub-Antarctic Areas Commercial Fishing) Regulations 1986 (SR 1986/220) Paul Reeves, Governor-General Order in Council At Wellington this 2nd day of September 1986 Present: The Right Hon G W R Palmer presiding in Council Pursuant to section 89 of the Fisheries Act 1983, His Excellency the Governor-Gener- al, acting by and with the advice and consent of the Executive Council, hereby makes the following regulations. Contents Page 1 Title, commencement, and application 4 2 Interpretation 4 Part 1 Southland area Total prohibition 3 Total prohibitions 15 Note Changes authorised by subpart 2 of Part 2 of the Legislation Act 2012 have been made in this official reprint. Note 4 at the end of this reprint provides a list of the amendments incorporated. These regulations are administered by the Ministry for Primary Industries. 1 Fisheries (Southland and Sub-Antarctic Areas Reprinted as at Commercial Fishing) Regulations 1986 1 October 2017 Certain fishing methods prohibited 3A Certain fishing methods prohibited in defined areas 16 3AB Set net fishing prohibited in defined area from Slope Point to Sand 18 Hill Point Minimum set net mesh size 3B Minimum set net mesh size 19 3BA Minimum net mesh for queen scallop trawling 20 Set net soak times 3C Set net soak times 20 3D Restrictions on fishing in paua quota management areas 21 3E Labelling of containers for paua taken in any PAU 5 quota 21 management area 3F Marking of blue cod pots and fish holding pots [Revoked] 21 Trawling 4 Trawling prohibited
    [Show full text]
  • 29 November 2005
    University of Auckland Institute of Marine Science Publications List maintained by Richard Taylor. Last updated: 31 July 2019. This map shows the relative frequencies of words in the publication titles listed below (1966-Nov. 2017), with “New Zealand” removed (otherwise it dominates), and variants of stem words and taxonomic synonyms amalgamated (e.g., ecology/ecological, Chrysophrys/Pagrus). It was created using Jonathan Feinberg’s utility at www.wordle.net. In press Markic, A., Gaertner, J.-C., Gaertner-Mazouni, N., Koelmans, A.A. Plastic ingestion by marine fish in the wild. Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology. McArley, T.J., Hickey, A.J.R., Wallace, L., Kunzmann, A., Herbert, N.A. Intertidal triplefin fishes have a lower critical oxygen tension (Pcrit), higher maximal aerobic capacity, and higher tissue glycogen stores than their subtidal counterparts. Journal of Comparative Physiology B: Biochemical, Systemic, and Environmental Physiology. O'Rorke, R., Lavery, S.D., Wang, M., Gallego, R., Waite, A.M., Beckley, L.E., Thompson, P.A., Jeffs, A.G. Phyllosomata associated with large gelatinous zooplankton: hitching rides and stealing bites. ICES Journal of Marine Science. Sayre, R., Noble, S., Hamann, S., Smith, R., Wright, D., Breyer, S., Butler, K., Van Graafeiland, K., Frye, C., Karagulle, D., Hopkins, D., Stephens, D., Kelly, K., Basher, Z., Burton, D., Cress, J., Atkins, K., Van Sistine, D.P., Friesen, B., Allee, R., Allen, T., Aniello, P., Asaad, I., Costello, M.J., Goodin, K., Harris, P., Kavanaugh, M., Lillis, H., Manca, E., Muller-Karger, F., Nyberg, B., Parsons, R., Saarinen, J., Steiner, J., Reed, A. A new 30 meter resolution global shoreline vector and associated global islands database for the development of standardized ecological coastal units.
    [Show full text]
  • Are Deep-Sea Fisheries Sustainable? a Summary of New Scientific Analysis: Norse, E.A., S
    RESEARCH SERIES AUGUST 2011 High biological vulnerability and economic incentives challenge the viability of deep-sea fisheries. ARE DEEP-SEA FISHERIES SUSTAINABLE? A SUMMARY OF NEW SCIENTIFIC AnaLYSIS: Norse, E.A., S. Brooke, W.W.L. Cheung, M.R. Clark, I. Ekeland, R. Froese, K.M. Gjerde, R.L. Haedrich, S.S. Heppell, T. Morato, L.E. Morgan, D. Pauly, U. R. Sumaila and R. Watson. 2012. Sustainability of Deep-sea Fisheries. Marine Policy 36(2): 307–320. AS COASTAL FISHERIES have declined around the world, fishermen have expanded their operations beyond exclusive economic zones (EEZs) to the high seas beyond EEZs, including the deep sea. Although the deep sea is the largest yet least ecologically productive part of the ocean, seamounts and other habitats can host significant amounts of some deep- sea fish species, especially when they aggregate to breed and feed. Many deep-sea fishes are slow to reproduce, or produce young only sporadically, however, making commercial fisheries unsustainable. Dr. Elliott Norse of the Marine Conservation Institute and a multidisciplinary team of co-authors analyzed data on fishes, fisheries and deep-sea biology and assessed key economic drivers and international laws to determine whether deep-sea commercial fishing could be sustainable. Ultimately, the authors conclude that most deep-sea fisheries are unsustainable, especially on the high seas. This Lenfest Research Series report is a summary of the scientists’ findings. DEEP-SEA FISHERIES As coastal fisheries have declined, fishing in the deep sea has increased. Technological advances have enabled fishing vessels to travel further from shore and locate aggregations of fish in depths that were unreachable years ago (see graphic).
    [Show full text]
  • The Biology of Casmara Subagronoma (Lepidoptera
    insects Article The Biology of Casmara subagronoma (Lepidoptera: Oecophoridae), a Stem-Boring Moth of Rhodomyrtus tomentosa (Myrtaceae): Descriptions of the Previously Unknown Adult Female and Immature Stages, and Its Potential as a Biological Control Candidate Susan A. Wineriter-Wright 1, Melissa C. Smith 1,* , Mark A. Metz 2 , Jeffrey R. Makinson 3 , Bradley T. Brown 3, Matthew F. Purcell 3, Kane L. Barr 4 and Paul D. Pratt 5 1 USDA-ARS Invasive Plant Research Laboratory, Fort Lauderdale, FL 33314, USA; [email protected] 2 USDA-ARS Systematic Entomology Lab, Beltsville, MD 20013-7012, USA; [email protected] 3 USDA-ARS Australian Biological Control Laboratory, CSIRO Health and Biosecurity, Dutton Park QLD 4102, Australia; jeff[email protected] (J.R.M.); [email protected] (B.T.B.); [email protected] (M.F.P.) 4 USDA-ARS Center for Medical, Agricultural and Veterinary Entomology, Gainesville, FL 32608, USA; [email protected] 5 USDA-ARS, Western Regional Research Center, Invasive Species and Pollinator Health Research Unit, 800 Buchanan Street, Albany, CA 94710, USA; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +1-954-475-6549 Received: 27 August 2020; Accepted: 16 September 2020; Published: 23 September 2020 Simple Summary: Rhodomyrtus tomentosa is a perennial woody shrub throughout Southeast Asia. Due to its prolific flower and fruit production, it was introduced into subtropical areas such as Florida and Hawai’i, where it is now naturalized and invasive. In an effort to find sustainable means to control R. tomentosa, a large-scale survey was mounted for biological control organisms.
    [Show full text]
  • Toxicity of Three Commercial Tannins to the Nuisance Invasive Species Limnoperna Fortunei (Dunker, 1857): Implications for Control
    © by PSP Volume 20 – No 6. 2011 Fresenius Environmental Bulletin TOXICITY OF THREE COMMERCIAL TANNINS TO THE NUISANCE INVASIVE SPECIES LIMNOPERNA FORTUNEI (DUNKER, 1857): IMPLICATIONS FOR CONTROL Patricio J. Pereyra1,*, Gustavo Bulus Rossini2 and Gustavo Darrigran1 1 GIMIP División Zoología de Invertebrados, Facultad de Ciencias Naturales y Museo, Universidad Nacional de La Plata, Paseo del Bosque s/n, (1900) La Plata, Argentina. 2 Centro de Investigaciones Medio Ambientales, CIC-PBA (1900) La Plata, Argentina. ABSTRACT habitats in the Neotropical region since there are no native freshwater bivalves that cause it [6]. Adding biocides to water is one strategy to control macrofouling organisms. A natural biocide that helps to Limnoperna fortunei infects man-made structures and prevent/control macrofouling of Limnoperna fortunei (Dun- causes macrofouling in three places in Southeast Asia: ker, 1857) on human installations is one way to minimize en- Hong Kong [9], Taiwan [10] and Japan [11]. In South Amer- vironmental impacts of different control strategies. Labora- ica, invasions have been recorded in various power stations tory tests were carried out to evaluate effects of three com- (nuclear, thermal and hydroelectric) [8], water treatment mercial tannis preparations (ECOTEC®-UA, ECOTEC®-L plants [6], and irrigation systems [7]. Among the many and ECOTEC®-MC) on the survival of two life-history problems caused by this species, the following are notewor- stages (larvae and adults) of L. fortunei. In addition tests thy: obstruction of filters and pipes, production of turbulent were performed on two non-target species, a crustacean flow, loss of hydraulic capacity and an increase in corrosion Daphnia magna and a plant Lactuca sativa, to evaluate [12].
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Invasive Species in the Northeastern and Southwestern Atlantic
    This is the author's accepted manuscript. The final published version of this work (the version of record) is published by Elsevier in Marine Pollution Bulletin. Corrected proofs were made available online on the 24 January 2017 at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2016.12.048. This work is made available online in accordance with the publisher's policies. Please refer to any applicable terms of use of the publisher. Invasive species in the Northeastern and Southwestern Atlantic Ocean: a review Maria Cecilia T. de Castroa,b, Timothy W. Filemanc and Jason M Hall-Spencerd,e a School of Marine Science and Engineering, University of Plymouth & Plymouth Marine Laboratory, Prospect Place, Plymouth, PL1 3DH, UK. [email protected]. +44(0)1752 633 100. b Directorate of Ports and Coasts, Navy of Brazil. Rua Te filo Otoni, 4 - Centro, 20090-070. Rio de Janeiro / RJ, Brazil. c PML Applications Ltd, Prospect Place, Plymouth, PL1 3DH, UK. d Marine Biology and Ecology Research Centre, Plymouth University, PL4 8AA, UK. e Shimoda Marine Research Centre, University of Tsukuba, Japan. Abstract The spread of non-native species has been a subject of increasing concern since the 1980s when human- as a major vector for species transportation and spread, although records of non-native species go back as far as 16th Century. Ever increasing world trade and the resulting rise in shipping have highlighted the issue, demanding a response from the international community to the threat of non-native marine species. In the present study, we searched for available literature and databases on shipping and invasive species in the North-eastern (NE) and South-western (SW) Atlantic Ocean and assess the risk represented by the shipping trade between these two regions.
    [Show full text]
  • Canadian Arctic Shipping
    Canadian Arctic Shipping: Issues and Perspectives Papers by: Adam Lajeunesse Will Russell A.E. Johnston INTERNATIONAL CENTRE FOR NORTHERN GOVERNANCE AND DEVELOPMENT Occasional Paper Series, Vol. 11-01 November 2011 Copyright © 2011 Adam Lajeunesse, Will Russell and A.E. Johnston International Centre for Northern Governance and Development University of Saskatchewan All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced in any form or by any means without the prior written permission of the publisher. In the case of photocopying or other forms of reprographic reproduction, please consult Access Copyright, the Canadian Copyright Licensing Agency, at 1–800–893–5777. Editing, design, and layout by Heather Exner-Pirot and Colleen Cameron. International Centre for Northern Governance and Development 117 Science Place University of Saskatchewan Saskatoon SK Canada S7N 5C8 Phone: (306) 966–1238 / Fax: (306) 966–7780 E-mail: [email protected] Website: www.usask.ca/icngd CONTENTS Executive Summary ................................................................................................................................. 2 A New Mediterranean? Arctic Shipping Prospects for the 21st Century, by Adam Lajeunesse ................................................................................................................................................... 4 Introduction .......................................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Arcola Malloi (Pastrana): Alligatorweed Stem Borer Moth Lepidoptera: Pyralidae Current Rating: Q Proposed Rating: D
    California Pest Rating Proposal Arcola malloi (Pastrana): Alligatorweed stem borer moth Lepidoptera: Pyralidae Current Rating: Q Proposed Rating: D Comment Period: 09/27/2019 through 11/11/2019 Initiating Event: An application was submitted for the purpose of releasing A. malloi in California for the control of alligatorweed. History & Status: Background: Arcola malloi, previously known as Vogtia malloi, is native to South America. It was released as a biological agent to control alligatorweed in the United States in the 1970s and in California in 1976. It is now established in the southeastern United States. The adult moth has a wingspan of approximately 30 mm. The female lays eggs on leaves and newly-hatched larvae tunnel into the stems. (Buckingham, 1996). Pupation occurs inside the plant. Arcola malloi attack aquatic and terrestrial alligatorweed stems, which turn yellow and die, and heavily damaged mats eventually rot and sink (Brown and Spencer, 1973). Field observations of 51 species of plants in the native habitat of A. malloi in Argentina, including seven species of Amaranthaceae (besides A. philoxeroides) and 26 species of Chenopodiaceae, did not reveal feeding damage by A. malloi on any except A. philoxeroides (Maddox and Hennessey, 1970). The host range of A. malloi was studied by Maddox and Hennessey (1970). They tested the ability of this moth to feed on 30 species of plants in six families. Full development was restricted to the tribe Gomphrenae, although there was moderate feeding on other Amaranthaceae and two species of Chenopodiaceae. In South America, A. malloi was reared from Alternanthera hassleriana and possibly Philoxerus portulacoides (Maddox and Hennessey, 1970), and it was found to develop on Blutaparon vermiculare in the southeastern United States.
    [Show full text]
  • Alligatorweed Scientific Name: Alternanthera Philoxeroides Order
    Common Name: Alligatorweed Scientific Name: Alternanthera philoxeroides Order: Caryophyllales Family: Amaranthaceae Wetland Plant Status: Obligatory Ecology & Description The stems of alligatorweed are long (up to 4 ft), hollow, and branched to allow the plant to float. The leaves are opposite, elongated, and elliptical with smooth edges. Leaves have a defined midrib with small pinnate veins. The plant produces a small cluster of white flowers during the warm parts of the year. The flowers are fragrant and consist of 6-10 florets and produce one small seed. Habitat The plant roots in shallow water (less than 6 ½ ft) and then begins to grow out from the anchor. This can be problematic as it can choke off entire waterways. The plant grows in segments and can grow roots or stems out of the nodes that separate each segmented piece. Distribution In the United States, alligatorweed is found from the southern marshes of Virginia to southern Florida and westward to Texas and is found in some parts of California. Native/Invasive Status Alligatorweed is a perennial non-native species of plant from South America that was accidentally introduced in the state of Florida. It is considered invasive in the United States, New Zealand, China, Australia, and Thailand. Alligatorweed is also considered to be a noxious plant because it disrupts water flow and aeration when it becomes thick. In times of high rain fall it can lead to flooding due to its clogging of the waterways. Wildlife Uses Mats of alligatorweed can be good habitat for many aquatic invertebrates and small fish that may serve as a food source for wildlife.
    [Show full text]