DOCSLIB.ORG

Displacement Overview Gedeo Zone (Snnpr)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Displacement Overview Gedeo Zone (Snnpr) DISPLACEMENT OVERVIEW GEDEO ZONE (SNNPR) SITE LEVEL ASSESSMENT 12 - 18 JULY 2018 KEY SITE INFORMATION KEY IDP INFORMATION 23 Spontaneous Camps 134 106 Collective Centres 4 Completely Inaccesible Sites Total Collective Sites 276,939 1 Dispersed Settlements 130 Total Displaced People In Collective Sites 19 Inaccesible Sites By Car 44,005 Collective Sites Assessed 123 Collective Sites with SMC Total Displaced Households In Collective Sites 127 Collective Sites with SMA Sidama Hadiya Arsi KTAlaba DEMOGRAPHICS Dila Town Sidama Hadiya ! Dila Town Wolayita West Arsi Population Location IDPs D!ila Zuria Sidama Abaya ÔÔ Bale Population in collective centres 217,971 Wenago Ô Gamo GofaGedio Bule Guji Population in spontaneous camps 58,518 ! Ô West Guji Abaya Yirgachefe Town Borena Liben Population in dispersed settlements 450 ! Dila Zuria ÔÔ Yirgachefe Ô Origins Zone Woreda Ô Ô ! Wenago Bule Ô Origin of the largest IDP group West Guji Kerca Ô Kochere ! Ô WGeestd eGbuji Ô Gelana MOBILITY Kercha Month of arrival Sites at which IDPs ÔÔ Yirgachefe Bule Hora Ô Ô Ô of the first IDP group March intend to return ÔÔ Yirgachefe Town Gedeo ÔÔ 116 Ô Ô Guji Ô Ô Gelana ÔÔ Ô Ô Month of arrival Time Frame Ô July ÔÔ Legend of the last IDP group Unknown Displaced individuals Ô Ô ÔKochere ÔÔ Collective sites (includes spontaneous ÔÔÔ Ô ÔÔ Ô ! 7,705 - 10,000 ÔÔÔ ÔÔ camps and collective centers) ÔÔ Ô Ô Displaced individuals (from Sites) SHELTER* Key Shelter Indicators ! 10,001 - 50,000 Ô Ô 7,705 - 10,000 Sites where >50% households living outside/open spaces 7 50,001 - 100,000 Ô Ô ! ÔÔÔÔ Ô ÔÔ ÔÔ ÔÔÔ Hambela Wamena ÔÔÔÔ Ô ÔÔÔ 10,001 - 50,000 Sites where >50% households living in permanent shelter 67 ! 100,001 - 129,629 West Guji Gedeb 50,001 - 100,000 Ô Kercha Sites where >50% households in below standard shelters 18 Ô This map is for illustration purposes only. The boundaries and 100,001 - 129,629 names shown and the designations used on this map do not Sites where >50% households in emergency shelters 23 imply official endorsement or acceptance by the International Bule Hora 0 3 6 12 18 No IDPs in collective sites Organization for Migration. Kms Most needed NFI in the majority of sites Kitchen Hera Liphitu Sets Garba 02 Kerca 01 METHODOLOGY Key Wash Indicators The DTM Rapid Response Site Assessment tool is desigend to provide detailed information Main source of drinking water Water taps at site level for emergencies occuring outside the DTM Mobility Tracking data collection WASH periods. IDP community leaders collaborated closely with IOM as key informants during the Sites where>50% people without enough drinking water 59 assessment. The aim of this assessment is to provide the humanitarian community with up- Sites where >50% people without functioning latrine 64 to-date information on the locations, needs and demographics of displaced populations. Sites where >50% people living in areas where open 40 defecation is frequently visible Sites where >50% people living in areas where dumped 45 garbage is frequently visible *Site totals may not sum to the total number of sites assessed as Sites where >50% people without enough containers to 90 each indicator may not apply to every site and multiple indicators fetch/store water may apply to the same site. DISPLACEMENT OVERVIEW GEDEO ZONE (SNNPR) SITE LEVEL ASSESSMENT 12 - 18 JULY 2018 Key Food and Nutrition Indicators How do most households access food? Food distri- PROTECTION Key Protection Indicators bution Number of sites at which security is provided 109 When was the last time food was distributed in the majority of sites Within the Who provides security at the majority of sites? Police/ month Militia FOOD Sites where > 50% households recieved food assistance 96 Number of sites at which security incidents are reported 46 Number of sites with access to a market 118 COMMUNICATION Most common reason for lack of market access Far from site Key Communication Indicators Number of sites where screening was conducted for malnourished 94 At the majority of sites, where do most residents get their Local children and/or pregnant and lactating women information/ news from? Leaders Number of sites where supplementary feeding is available for 66 At the majority of sites, what additional information would be most safety and pregnant and lactating mothers beneficial for IDPs? security Number of sites where supplementary feeding is available for 63 situation in children origin Key Health Indicators HEALTH Number of sites at which unusual number of deaths in the last 30 Key Livelihood Indicators month were observed? LIVELIHOOD Occupation/trade of IDPs in the majority of sites None Number of sites at which unusual deaths of animals were observed 10 Number of sites where 25% or more IDPs have access to income 3 in the last month? generating activities At the majority of sites how long does it take to reach the health Off-site Number of sites with livestock on site 45 facility? (less than 30 min- Number of sites where 25% or more IDPs have access to land 4 utes) In the majority of sites, where are most women are delivering Health childern? facilities Are most women seeing health professionals during their yes pregnancy? EDUCATION Key Education Indicators Number of sites with access to alternative basic education (ABE) 2 Number of sites with access to formal primary education (FPE) 2 * This DTM report is intended to provide a summary of the key sectoral indicators and demographic data collected during the rapid site assessment. For comprehensive data on all indicators please see the full dataset available on request from DTM Ethiopia, dtmethiopia@ iom.int. DISPLACEMENT OVERVIEW BULE WOREDA, GEDEO ZONE (SNNPR) SITE LEVEL ASSESSMENT 12 - 18 JULY 2018 KEY SITE INFORMATION KEY IDP INFORMATION 0 Spontaneous Camps 10 Collective Centres 10 Collective Sites with SMC 10 10 Collective Sites with SMA 7,705 Total Displaced People In Collective Sites 0 Dispersed Settlements Total Collective 1,490 Total Displaced Households In Collective Sites 1 Inaccesible Sites Sites DEMOGRAPHICS Population Location IDPs SN147 8602 Ô Population in collective centres 7,705 Hadiya Arsi Population in spontaneous camps 0 KTAlaba Dila Town SN131 Hadiya ! Ô Ô Wolayita West Arsi Population in dispersed settlements 0 Dila Zuria ÔSN130 Sidama Abaya ! ÔSN129 Bale Origins Zone Woreda Wenago Gamo GofaGedio Bule SN135 Origin of the largest IDP group West Guji Dimtu Hambala /Hambela Ô West Guji Guji Ô ! Dila Zuria SN127Ô SN128 Wamena Yirgachefe To!wn Borena Liben SN132 Yirgachefe ÔÔ ÔÔSN134 Legend Ô Month of arrival MOBILITY Sites at which IDPs Ô Ô Collective sites (includes spontaneous ! camps & collective centers) ÔÔ of the first IDP group June intend to return Kochere Ô Displaced individuals (from Sites) ! Wenago Bule Ô SN136 10 (7,705 IDPs) Gedeb Ô 7,705 - 10,000 Gelana 10,001 - 50,000 SN133 Ô Month of arrival Time Frame ÔÔ Kercha June Bule Hora 50,001 - 100,000 of the last IDP group Unknown 100,001 - 129,629 No IDPs in collective sites Ô SHELTER Key Shelter Indicators HH Yirgachefe ÔÔ Site ID Site Name Sites where >50% households living outside/open spaces 0 SN127 Wetatoch Maikele Displaced individuals Sites where >50% households living in permanent 6 SN128 Fird Bet 03 Bule ! 7,705 - 10,000 shelter 30861 SN129 02 FTC Ô Ô Guji Sites where >50% households in below standard shelters 1 Ô ! 10,001 - 50,000 SN130 Sefere Selam ! 50,001 - 100,000 SN131 Congress Miker Bet Sites where >50% households in emergency shelters 2 SN132 Kilito Kalehiwot Church Most needed NFI in the majority of sites Kitchen Sets ! 100,001 - 129,629 SN133 Elalcha Loke SN134 Sika This map is for illustration purposes only. The boundaries and Key Wash Indicators SN135 Bule Daro School names shown and the designations used on this maÔp do not imply offi5ci3al7 e7n3dorsement or acceptance by the International 0 1.5 3 6 9 SN136 Suko Main source of drinking water Water taps Kms WASH Organization for Migration. Ô Ô Ô Sites where>50% people without enough drinking water 5 Ô Sites where >50% people without functioning latrine 7 Sites where >50% people living in areas where open 2 defecation is frequently visible Sites where >50% people living in areas where dumped 3 garbage is frequently visible Sites where >50% people without enough containers to 6 fetch/store water DISPLACEMENT OVERVIEW BULE WOREDA, GEDEO ZONE (SNNPR) SITE LEVEL ASSESSMENT 12 - 18 JULY 2018 Key Food and Nutrition Indicators PROTECTION Key Protection Indicators How do most households access food? Food distri- bution Number of sites at which security is provided 10 When was the last time food was distributed in the majority of sites Within the Who provides security at the majority of sites? Police/ Militia FOOD month Sites where > 50% households recieved food assistance 8 Number of sites at which security incidents are reported 2 Number of sites with access to a market 9 Most common reason for lack of market access Distance COMMUNICATION Number of sites where screening was conducted for malnourished 9 children and/or pregnant and lactating women Key Communication Indicators Number of sites where supplementary feeding is available for 6 At the majority of sites, where do most residents get their Family and pregnant and lactating mothers information/ news from? friends Number of sites where supplementary feeding is available for 5 At the majority of sites, what additional information would be most safety and children beneficial for IDPs? security situation in origin Key Health Indicators Number of sites at which unusual number of deaths
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Districts of Ethiopia
    Region District or Woredas Zone Remarks Afar Region Argobba Special Woreda -- Independent district/woredas Afar Region Afambo Zone 1 (Awsi Rasu) Afar Region Asayita Zone 1 (Awsi Rasu) Afar Region Chifra Zone 1 (Awsi Rasu) Afar Region Dubti Zone 1 (Awsi Rasu) Afar Region Elidar Zone 1 (Awsi Rasu) Afar Region Kori Zone 1 (Awsi Rasu) Afar Region Mille Zone 1 (Awsi Rasu) Afar Region Abala Zone 2 (Kilbet Rasu) Afar Region Afdera Zone 2 (Kilbet Rasu) Afar Region Berhale Zone 2 (Kilbet Rasu) Afar Region Dallol Zone 2 (Kilbet Rasu) Afar Region Erebti Zone 2 (Kilbet Rasu) Afar Region Koneba Zone 2 (Kilbet Rasu) Afar Region Megale Zone 2 (Kilbet Rasu) Afar Region Amibara Zone 3 (Gabi Rasu) Afar Region Awash Fentale Zone 3 (Gabi Rasu) Afar Region Bure Mudaytu Zone 3 (Gabi Rasu) Afar Region Dulecha Zone 3 (Gabi Rasu) Afar Region Gewane Zone 3 (Gabi Rasu) Afar Region Aura Zone 4 (Fantena Rasu) Afar Region Ewa Zone 4 (Fantena Rasu) Afar Region Gulina Zone 4 (Fantena Rasu) Afar Region Teru Zone 4 (Fantena Rasu) Afar Region Yalo Zone 4 (Fantena Rasu) Afar Region Dalifage (formerly known as Artuma) Zone 5 (Hari Rasu) Afar Region Dewe Zone 5 (Hari Rasu) Afar Region Hadele Ele (formerly known as Fursi) Zone 5 (Hari Rasu) Afar Region Simurobi Gele'alo Zone 5 (Hari Rasu) Afar Region Telalak Zone 5 (Hari Rasu) Amhara Region Achefer -- Defunct district/woredas Amhara Region Angolalla Terana Asagirt -- Defunct district/woredas Amhara Region Artuma Fursina Jile -- Defunct district/woredas Amhara Region Banja -- Defunct district/woredas Amhara Region Belessa --
    [Show full text]
  • Midterm Survey Protocol
    Protocol for L10K Midterm Survey The Last 10 Kilometers Project JSI Research & Training Institute, Inc. Addis Ababa, Ethiopia October 2010 Contents Introduction ........................................................................................................................................................ 2 The Last Ten Kilometers Project ............................................................................................................ 3 Objective one activities cover all the L10K woredas: .......................................................................... 4 Activities for objectives two, three and four in selected woredas ...................................................... 5 The purpose of the midterm survey ....................................................................................................... 6 The midterm survey design ...................................................................................................................... 7 Annex 1: List of L10K woredas by region, implementation strategy, and implementing phase ......... 10 Annex 2: Maps.................................................................................................................................................. 11 Annex 3: Research questions with their corresponding study design ...................................................... 14 Annex 4: Baseline survey methodology ........................................................................................................ 15 Annex 5: L10K midterm survey
    [Show full text]
  • Humanitarian Bulletin
    Humanitarian Bulletin Ethiopia Issue #3| 17– 23 Feb. 2020 In this issue Recovery programming to returnees P.1 US$51.5 required for DL response P.2 Ethiopia’s ratification of the Kampala HIGHLIGHTS Convention P.2 • A US$20 million The personal story of Damma Abbalosa, recovery project an IDP in Hara Kela, Guji Zone P.3 (2019-2022) to benefit 50,000 Funding update P.4 households heavily impacted by the Gedeo-West Guji Displacement. • The project seeks to complement 50,000 returnee HHs in Gedeo and West Guji humanitarian assistance by zones to benefit from recovery programming supporting IDPs and local communities as A four-year recovery project (2019-2022) is underway in Gedeo zone SNNP region and per UNDP’s global West Guji zone, Oromia region with a total required budget of US$20 million. The project 3x6 approach that targets 50,000 households heavily impacted by the Gedeo-West Guji displacement in builds resilience in Kercha and Hamela Wamena woredas of West Guji Zone and Gedeb and Yirgachefe post-crisis situations woredas of Gedeo Zone. The project comes in complement of humanitarian assistance by for vulnerable groups supporting IDPs and local communities in the next phase towards recovery as per UNDP’s through introducing global 3x6 approach that builds resilience in post-crisis situations for vulnerable groups sustainable through introducing sustainable livelihoods. livelihoods. FIGURES People People in need targeted Food/Non- 8.4 M 7 M food SAM 544K 444K MAM 3.9 M 3.1 M IDPs 1.01M 1.01M Returnees 1.78 M 1.78 M HUMANITARIAN FUNDING US$1.001 billion Requirement for 2020 Ethiopia Humanitarian Response Plan Figure 1 IDPs sheltering at Harmufo site, Gedeb town at the height of the crisis in July 2018.
    [Show full text]
  • Ethiopia: West Guji – Gedeo Conflict Displacement Flash Update 2
    Ethiopia: West Guji – Gedeo Conflict Displacement Flash Update 2 22 May 2018 Highlights • A rapid assessment conducted in Gedeo zone (SNNPR) found that at least 274,5481 people were displaced from West Guji (Oromia) to Gedeo zone following the violence that erupted along the regional boundary in mid-April. Some 84,000 people were also displaced in West Guji zone. More than 4,000 houses were reportedly burnt down or damaged in West Guji and livelihoods destroyed. • Official reports indicate that as of early May, 102,593 people of the 274,548 people displaced in Gedeo were returned to their villages in West Guji zone • The Government, the local community and civil society were the first and main responders to date, with sup- port from few partners. Significant gaps in food, shelter, NFI and WaSH are reported • Although there were no reported health outbreaks so far, AWD, scabies and measles are potential health risks due to the use of water from unsafe sources, open defecation, overcrowded shelter and sharing of clothes. The overcrowded shelter conditions within hosting households also present protection concerns. Dara Sidama Dila I. Displacement overview ! 12,176 452 Bore Chichu A rapid assessment conducted in Gedeo zone ! 3,772 (SNNPR) from 2 to 8 May found that at least Dila Zuria stite eturns 274,548 people (139,494 male; 135,104 female) Wenago einin ! were displaced from West Guji (Oromia) to Gedeo Bule isceent 4,844 ! Koti ! zone, following the inter-communal violence that 8,198 Ilalcha ! erupted in mid-April 2018 along the borders of the Wenago Bule Abaya two zones.
    [Show full text]
  • Socio-Economic Assessment
    SOCIO-ECONOMIC ASSESSMENT SNNP IAIP and RTC Report Produced by: WSP in collaboration with Engineer Tequam Water Resources Development and Environment Consultancy (ETWRDEC) DATE: JANUARY 2018 Socio-Economic Assessment – SNNP IAIP & RTCDraft January 2018 Table of Contents 1 INTRODUCTION .................................................................... 1 1.1 social areas of influence (AoI) – social study area ............................................................................................................ 1 1.2 administrative and demographic environment ......................................................................................... 1 1.3 migration patterns .............................................................................3 1.4 land use, livelihood and vulnerability .......................................3 1.5 ethnicity, religion and language ................................................. 4 1.6 education .............................................................................................. 4 1.7 household income and expenditure ........................................ 4 1.8 existing infrastructure .................................................................... 5 1.9 national holidays ............................................................................... 5 2 SOCIO-ECONOMIC PROFILE OF PEOPLE IN THE PROJECT AREA (BASED ON WSP SURVEY) ............................................. 7 2.1 methodology .......................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • World Bank Document
    Sample Procurement Plan (Text in italic font is meant for instruction to staff and should be deleted in the final version of the PP) Public Disclosure Authorized (This is only a sample with the minimum content that is required to be included in the PAD. The detailed procurement plan is still mandatory for disclosure on the Bank’s website in accordance with the guidelines. The initial procurement plan will cover the first 18 months of the project and then updated annually or earlier as necessary). I. General 1. Bank’s approval Date of the procurement Plan: Updated Procurement Plan, M 2. Date of General Procurement Notice: Dec 24, 2006 Public Disclosure Authorized 3. Period covered by this procurement plan: The procurement period of project covered from year June 2010 to December 2012 II. Goods and Works and non-consulting services. 1. Prior Review Threshold: Procurement Decisions subject to Prior Review by the Bank as stated in Appendix 1 to the Guidelines for Procurement: [Thresholds for applicable procurement methods (not limited to the list below) will be determined by the Procurement Specialist /Procurement Accredited Staff based on the assessment of the implementing agency’s capacity.] Public Disclosure Authorized Procurement Method Prior Review Comments Threshold US$ 1. ICB and LIB (Goods) Above US$ 500,000 All 2. NCB (Goods) Above US$ 100,000 First contract 3. ICB (Works) Above US$ 15 million All 4. NCB (Works) Above US$ 5 million All 5. (Non-Consultant Services) Below US$ 100,000 First contract [Add other methods if necessary] 2. Prequalification. Bidders for _Not applicable_ shall be prequalified in accordance with the provisions of paragraphs 2.9 and 2.10 of the Public Disclosure Authorized Guidelines.
    [Show full text]
  • Oromia Region Administrative Map(As of 27 March 2013)
    ETHIOPIA: Oromia Region Administrative Map (as of 27 March 2013) Amhara Gundo Meskel ! Amuru Dera Kelo ! Agemsa BENISHANGUL ! Jangir Ibantu ! ! Filikilik Hidabu GUMUZ Kiremu ! ! Wara AMHARA Haro ! Obera Jarte Gosha Dire ! ! Abote ! Tsiyon Jars!o ! Ejere Limu Ayana ! Kiremu Alibo ! Jardega Hose Tulu Miki Haro ! ! Kokofe Ababo Mana Mendi ! Gebre ! Gida ! Guracha ! ! Degem AFAR ! Gelila SomHbo oro Abay ! ! Sibu Kiltu Kewo Kere ! Biriti Degem DIRE DAWA Ayana ! ! Fiche Benguwa Chomen Dobi Abuna Ali ! K! ara ! Kuyu Debre Tsige ! Toba Guduru Dedu ! Doro ! ! Achane G/Be!ret Minare Debre ! Mendida Shambu Daleti ! Libanos Weberi Abe Chulute! Jemo ! Abichuna Kombolcha West Limu Hor!o ! Meta Yaya Gota Dongoro Kombolcha Ginde Kachisi Lefo ! Muke Turi Melka Chinaksen ! Gne'a ! N!ejo Fincha!-a Kembolcha R!obi ! Adda Gulele Rafu Jarso ! ! ! Wuchale ! Nopa ! Beret Mekoda Muger ! ! Wellega Nejo ! Goro Kulubi ! ! Funyan Debeka Boji Shikute Berga Jida ! Kombolcha Kober Guto Guduru ! !Duber Water Kersa Haro Jarso ! ! Debra ! ! Bira Gudetu ! Bila Seyo Chobi Kembibit Gutu Che!lenko ! ! Welenkombi Gorfo ! ! Begi Jarso Dirmeji Gida Bila Jimma ! Ketket Mulo ! Kersa Maya Bila Gola ! ! ! Sheno ! Kobo Alem Kondole ! ! Bicho ! Deder Gursum Muklemi Hena Sibu ! Chancho Wenoda ! Mieso Doba Kurfa Maya Beg!i Deboko ! Rare Mida ! Goja Shino Inchini Sululta Aleltu Babile Jimma Mulo ! Meta Guliso Golo Sire Hunde! Deder Chele ! Tobi Lalo ! Mekenejo Bitile ! Kegn Aleltu ! Tulo ! Harawacha ! ! ! ! Rob G! obu Genete ! Ifata Jeldu Lafto Girawa ! Gawo Inango ! Sendafa Mieso Hirna
    [Show full text]
  • Demography and Health
    SNNPR Southern Nations Nationalities and Peoples Demography and Health Aynalem Adugna, July 2014 www.EthioDemographyAndHealth.Org 2 SNNPR is one of the largest regions in Ethiopia, accounting for more than 10 percent of the country’s land area [1]. The mid-2008 population is estimated at nearly 16,000,000; almost a fifth of the country’s population. With less than one in tenth of its population (8.9%) living in urban areas in 2008 the region is overwhelmingly rural. "The region is divided into 13 administrative zones, 133 Woredas and 3512 Kebeles, and its capital is Awassa." [1] "The SNNPR is an extremely ethnically diverse region of Ethiopia, inhabited by more than 80 ethnic groups, of which over 45 (or 56 percent) are indigenous to the region (CSA 1996). These ethnic groups are distinguished by different languages, cultures, and socioeconomic organizations. Although none of the indigenous ethnic groups dominates the ethnic makeup of the national population, there is a considerable ethnic imbalance within the region. The largest ethnic groups in the SNNPR are the Sidama (17.6 percent), Wolayta (11.7 percent), Gurage (8.8 percent), Hadiya (8.4 percent), Selite (7.1 percent), Gamo (6.7 percent), Keffa (5.3 percent), Gedeo (4.4 percent), and Kembata (4.3 percent) …. While the Sidama are the largest ethnic group in the region, each ethnic group is numerically dominant in its respective administrative zone, and there are large minority ethnic groups in each zone. The languages spoken in the SNNPR can be classified into four linguistic families: Cushitic, Nilotic, Omotic, and Semitic.
    [Show full text]
  • (Coffea Arabica L.) Quality Determining Factors in Gedeo Zone, Southern Ethiopia
    Vol. 14(28), pp. 1216-1228, 11 July, 2019 DOI: 10.5897/AJAR2019.14116 Article Number: CE6D21861350 ISSN: 1991-637X Copyright ©2019 African Journal of Agricultural Author(s) retain the copyright of this article http://www.academicjournals.org/AJAR Research Full Length Research Paper Assessment of pre and post-harvest management practices on coffee (Coffea arabica L.) quality determining factors in Gedeo zone, Southern Ethiopia Kidist Teshome1, Zerihun Girma2 and Biniam Eshetu3* 1Department of Horticulture, College of Agriculture and Natural Resource, Dilla University, Dilla Ethiopia. 2Department of Horticulture, College of Agriculture and Natural Resource, Dilla University, Dilla Ethiopia. 3 Department of Agricultural Economics, College of Agriculture and Natural Resource, Dilla University, Dilla Ethiopia. Received 17 April, 2019; Accepted 7 June, 2019 In Gedeo zone, coffee quality is declining from time to time due to several improper pre and post- harvest management practices. Therefore, this study was designed with the objective of assessing impact of pre and post-harvest management practices on Coffea arabica L. quality determining factors in Gedeo zone, Southern Ethiopia. Totally, 90 household respondents were used from three Woredas and selected purposively. Finally, quantitative data was analyzed by employing SPSS (version 20). In pre harvesting practices, the result indicated that most of the respondents owned old coffee trees (>20 years), prune their tree frequently within one year interval and observed various diseases on their coffee tree. According to the survey result, majority of farmers use shade trees, which is the most common cropping practiced by coffee producing farmers in the study area, and majority of the farmers use dry method of coffee processing.
    [Show full text]
  • Ethiopia Humanitarian Situation Report
    UNICEF ETHIOPIA HUMANITARIAN SITUATION REPORT ETHIOPIA Humanitarian Situation Report SitRep # 5 - Reporting Period May 2019 SITUATION IN NUMBERS Highlights 4.89 million # of children in need of humanitarian Failed spring rains this year in parts of Afar, Amhara, Oromia and Somali regions have renewed concerns about another drought affecting children, assistance (Ethiopia Humanitarian Needs Overview 2019) further compounding vulnerabilities in regions already suffering from chronic food insecurity, prolonged and complex population displacements, and increased risks to outbreaks of cholera and measles. These regions 8.86 million also have over-stretched health care systems, poor access to water, and # of people in need recurrent outbreaks of preventable diseases. (Ethiopia Humanitarian Needs Overview 2019) As of April 2019, UNICEF has supported the screening and admission of 110,826 children under the age of five for severe acute malnutrition (SAM) 3.19 million treatment and the numbers are expected to grow with the projected Internally displaced persons in Ethiopia drought in the country. (Ethiopia Humanitarian Needs Overview 2019) UNICEF Ethiopia urgently requires US$ 5.4 million to replenish its nutrition commodities pipeline for the expected surge in severe acute malnutrition 919,938 (SAM) in 2019. In addition, US$ 2.45 million is required to rehabilitate 35 Registered refugees and asylum seekers in water schemes and provide durable safe water and sanitation for the most Ethiopia vulnerable children, including displaced children,
    [Show full text]
  • Periodic Monitoring Report Working 2016 Humanitarian Requirements Document – Ethiopia Group
    DRMTechnical Periodic Monitoring Report Working 2016 Humanitarian Requirements Document – Ethiopia Group Covering 1 Jan to 31 Dec 2016 Prepared by Clusters and NDRMC Introduction The El Niño global climactic event significantly affected the 2015 meher/summer rains on the heels of failed belg/ spring rains in 2015, driving food insecurity, malnutrition and serious water shortages in many parts of the country. The Government and humanitarian partners issued a joint 2016 Humanitarian Requirements Document (HRD) in December 2015 requesting US$1.4 billion to assist 10.2 million people with food, health and nutrition, water, agriculture, shelter and non-food items, protection and emergency education responses. Following the delay and erratic performance of the belg/spring rains in 2016, a Prioritization Statement was issued in May 2016 with updated humanitarian requirements in nutrition (MAM), agriculture, shelter and non-food items and education.The Mid-Year Review of the HRD identified 9.7 million beneficiaries and updated the funding requirements to $1.2 billion. The 2016 HRD is 69 per cent funded, with contributions of $1.08 billion from international donors and the Government of Ethiopia (including carry-over resources from 2015). Under the leadership of the Government of Ethiopia delivery of life-saving and life- sustaining humanitarian assistance continues across the sectors. However, effective humanitarian response was challenged by shortage of resources, limited logistical capacities and associated delays, and weak real-time information management. This Periodic Monitoring Report (PMR) provides a summary of the cluster financial inputs against outputs and achievements against cluster objectives using secured funding since the launch of the 2016 HRD.
    [Show full text]
  • Ethiopia Administrative Map As of 2013
    (as of 27 March 2013) ETHIOPIA:Administrative Map R E Legend E R I T R E A North D Western \( Erob \ Tahtay Laelay National Capital Mereb Ahferom Gulomekeda Adiyabo Adiyabo Leke Central Ganta S Dalul P Afeshum Saesie Tahtay Laelay Adwa E P Tahtay Tsaedaemba Regional Capital Kafta Maychew Maychew Koraro Humera Asgede Werei Eastern A Leke Hawzen Tsimbila Medebay Koneba Zana Kelete Berahle Western Atsbi International Boundary Welkait Awelallo Naeder Tigray Wenberta Tselemti Adet Kola Degua Tsegede Temben Mekele Temben P Zone 2 Undetermined Boundary Addi Tselemt Tanqua Afdera Abergele Enderta Arekay Ab Ala Tsegede Beyeda Mirab Armacho Debark Hintalo Abergele Saharti Erebti Regional Boundary Wejirat Tach Samre Megale Bidu Armacho Dabat Janamora Alaje Lay Sahla Zonal Boundary Armacho Wegera Southern Ziquala Metema Sekota Endamehoni Raya S U D A N North Wag Azebo Chilga Yalo Amhara East Ofla Teru Woreda Boundary Gonder West Belesa Himra Kurri Gonder Dehana Dembia Belesa Zuria Gaz Alamata Zone 4 Quara Gibla Elidar Takusa I Libo Ebenat Gulina Lake Kemkem Bugna Kobo Awra Afar T Lake Tana Lasta Gidan (Ayna) Zone 1 0 50 100 200 km Alfa Ewa U Fogera North Farta Lay Semera ¹ Meket Guba Lafto Semen Gayint Wollo P O Dubti Jawi Achefer Bahir Dar East Tach Wadla Habru Chifra B G U L F O F A D E N Delanta Aysaita Creation date:27 Mar.2013 P Dera Esite Gayint I Debub Bahirdar Ambasel Dawunt Worebabu Map Doc Name:21_ADM_000_ETH_032713_A0 Achefer Zuria West Thehulederie J Dangura Simada Tenta Sources:CSA (2007 population census purpose) and Field Pawe Mecha
    [Show full text]