DOCSLIB.ORG

Resettlement Policy Framework

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Public Disclosure Authorized HIS MAJESTY’S GOVERNMENT OF NEPAL MINISTRY OF LOCAL DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT OF LOCAL INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT AND AGRICULTURE ROADS Public Disclosure Authorized ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL MANAGEMENT FRAMEWORK Public Disclosure Authorized RURAL ACCESS IMPROVEMENT PROJECT Public Disclosure Authorized FINAL DRAFT NOVEMBER 29, 2004 Abbreviations Acronyms APP Agricultural Perspective Plan B.S. Bikram Sambat CAS Country Assistance Strategy CBO Community Based Organization CDC Compensation Determination Committee CDO Chief District Officer CFUG Community Forestry User Groups COI Corridor of Impact DDC District Development Committee DOLIDAR Department of Local Infrastructure Development and Agricultural Roads DTMP District Transportation Master Plan EA Environmental Assessment EIA Environmental Impact Assessment EMG Environmental Management Group EMP Environmental Management Action Plan EMP Environmental Management Plan EPA Environmental Protection Act EPA 97 Environmental Protection Act 1997 EPR 97 Environmental Protection Regulation 1997 (amendment 1999) ESA Environmental and Social Assessment ESAF Environmental and Social Assessment Framework ESIA Environmental and Social Impact Assessment HMG His Majesty’s Government HMG/N His Majesty’s Government of Nepal IBRD International Bank for Rural Development IDA International Development Association IEE Initial Environmental Examination IP Indigenous People IUCN International Conservation Union LCF Land Compensation Framework LEF Land Entitlement Framework LIL Learning and Innovation Loan MoH Ministry of Home MoLD Ministry of Local Development MoLRM Ministry of Land Reform and Management MoPE Ministry of Population and Environment MoWT Ministry of Works and Transport NGO Non-Governmental Organization NPC National Planning Commission NRATSP Nepal Rural Accessibility and Transport Service Project PAF Project Affected Families PWD Public Works Directives RAP Resettlement Action Plan RIP Rural Infrastructure Project ROW Right of Way SA Social Assessment SAP Social Action Plan SPAF Seriously Project Affected Families TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................................ i 1. INTRODUCTION................................................................................................................... 1 Project Description............................................................................................................. 2 Project Components............................................................................................................ 2 Project Districts.................................................................................................................. 4 2. APPROACH AND METHODOLOGY................................................................................. 7 Objectives And Scope Of The Environmental And Social Management Framework......... 7 Environment Aspects .......................................................................................................... 7 Social Aspects ..................................................................................................................... 9 3. POLICES, REGULATIONS AND GUIDELINES ............................................................ 12 Relevant HMGN Policies.................................................................................................. 12 HMGN’s Legislative Framework and Guidelines ............................................................ 13 HMGN Policies Supporting Vulnerable Communities ..................................................... 15 World Bank Environment and Social Safeguard Policies ................................................ 17 Comparison of HMGN and World Bank Policies on involuntary resettlement and land acquistion ................................................................................................................... 20 Recommendations............................................................................................................. 23 4. IDENTIFICATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL IMPACTS ..................... 24 General ............................................................................................................................. 24 Environmental Review...................................................................................................... 24 Environmental impacts on sample raip sub-projects........................................................ 30 Social Review.................................................................................................................... 30 Conclusions....................................................................................................................... 36 5. ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL MANAGEMENT FRAMEWORK....................... 37 General ............................................................................................................................. 37 Environment Assessment And Management ..................................................................... 38 Environmental Screening Process ....................................................................... 38 Environmental Screening Criteria ....................................................................... 38 Environmental Assessment Process for RAIP .................................................................. 39 Initial Environmental Examination .................................................................................. 39 Environmental Impact Assessment ................................................................................... 42 Rural Access Improvement Project Environment and Social Management Framework Environmental Impact Prediction..................................................................................... 43 Environmental and Social Mitigation Measures in RAIP................................................. 46 Approach to Mitigation Measure......................................................................... 46 Implementation Mitigation Measures for RAIP................................................................ 47 Implementation of Mitigation Measures........................................................................... 48 Environmental Management Plan .................................................................................... 51 Capacity building.............................................................................................................. 54 6. RESETTLEMENT POLICY FRAMEWORK................................................................... 55 Description and Objectives............................................................................................... 55 Social Screening ............................................................................................................... 55 Voluntary Land Donation................................................................................................. 55 Involuntary Resettlement and Land Acquisition............................................................... 56 Eligibility Criteria ............................................................................................................ 57 Subproject Resettlement Action Plans .............................................................................. 61 Implementation Process.................................................................................................... 61 Grievance Redress Mechanisms ....................................................................................... 61 Funding Arrangements ..................................................................................................... 62 Consultation /Participation .............................................................................................. 62 Monitoring and Evaluation............................................................................................... 62 Capacity Building ............................................................................................................. 63 7. VULNERABLE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK............................. 64 Description And Objectives .............................................................................................. 64 Policies Strategies And Actions........................................................................................ 64 Subproject Vulnerable Communities Development Plans................................... 64 Social Uplift Activities ........................................................................................ 65 Strategy for Vulnerable Communities Development........................................... 65 8. Consultation/Information Dissemination/Documentation Activity Supporting Monitoring and Evaluation of RAIP Implementation ........................................................................... 68 9. IMPLEMENTATION ARRANGEMENTS ....................................................................... 71 Institutional Arrangements ............................................................................................... 71 General................................................................................................................. 71 Institutional Arrangement for ESMF Implementation......................................... 71 Monitoring And Evaulation .............................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • Food Insecurity and Undernutrition in Nepal

    Food Insecurity and Undernutrition in Nepal

    SMALL AREA ESTIMATION OF FOOD INSECURITY AND UNDERNUTRITION IN NEPAL GOVERNMENT OF NEPAL National Planning Commission Secretariat Central Bureau of Statistics SMALL AREA ESTIMATION OF FOOD INSECURITY AND UNDERNUTRITION IN NEPAL GOVERNMENT OF NEPAL National Planning Commission Secretariat Central Bureau of Statistics Acknowledgements The completion of both this and the earlier feasibility report follows extensive consultation with the National Planning Commission, Central Bureau of Statistics (CBS), World Food Programme (WFP), UNICEF, World Bank, and New ERA, together with members of the Statistics and Evidence for Policy, Planning and Results (SEPPR) working group from the International Development Partners Group (IDPG) and made up of people from Asian Development Bank (ADB), Department for International Development (DFID), United Nations Development Programme (UNDP), UNICEF and United States Agency for International Development (USAID), WFP, and the World Bank. WFP, UNICEF and the World Bank commissioned this research. The statistical analysis has been undertaken by Professor Stephen Haslett, Systemetrics Research Associates and Institute of Fundamental Sciences, Massey University, New Zealand and Associate Prof Geoffrey Jones, Dr. Maris Isidro and Alison Sefton of the Institute of Fundamental Sciences - Statistics, Massey University, New Zealand. We gratefully acknowledge the considerable assistance provided at all stages by the Central Bureau of Statistics. Special thanks to Bikash Bista, Rudra Suwal, Dilli Raj Joshi, Devendra Karanjit, Bed Dhakal, Lok Khatri and Pushpa Raj Paudel. See Appendix E for the full list of people consulted. First published: December 2014 Design and processed by: Print Communication, 4241355 ISBN: 978-9937-3000-976 Suggested citation: Haslett, S., Jones, G., Isidro, M., and Sefton, A. (2014) Small Area Estimation of Food Insecurity and Undernutrition in Nepal, Central Bureau of Statistics, National Planning Commissions Secretariat, World Food Programme, UNICEF and World Bank, Kathmandu, Nepal, December 2014.
  • Natural Resource, Market Demand and Target Group Analysis of Siraha District-Development Management Institute

    Natural Resource, Market Demand and Target Group Analysis of Siraha District-Development Management Institute

    Published by: Micro-Enterprise Development Programme Ministry of Industry United Nations Development Programme June 2013 Copyright © 2013 Micro-Enterprise Development Programme (MEDEP)/UNDP All rights are reserved. No part of this edited volume may be reproduced by any means, nor transmitted, nor translated into a machine language without the written permission of the publisher. ISBN: 978-99946-916-6-1 Printed in Nepal at : Office Support Service Centre Chhapakhana P. Ltd. Teku, Kathmandu Tel.: 4240571 Email.: [email protected] Natural Resource, Market Demand and Target Group Analysis of Siraha District1 Abstract MEDEP was piloted in 1998. It expanded to 36 districts by 2010 in its third phase (2008-13). The development objective of the programme was to contribute to reduce poverty among low-income families in rural areas, and to ensure the institutional development and capacity building of local service delivery organizations to work as catalysts in the development of rural micro-enterprise sector. In order to reach its target group, MEDEP conducts natural resource, market demand and target group surveys in the new programme districts. As Siraha was added as a new programme district in the third phase, this study was conducted to furnish these information. On the basis of the major findings, this study concluded that Siraha district has a high potential of developing micro- enterprises to create employment and income-generating opportunities for the MEDEP's target groups. For implementation effectiveness and better results, MEDEP should concentrate its programme on 32 new VDCs clustered around six market centres. Entrepreneurs should be supported in marketing skill development, market survey and marketing.
  • World Bank Document

    World Bank Document

    Project name: Project for Strenghtening National Rural Transport Program New Activities Loan: IDA-5336 & H8990 Modified Activities Procurement Plan Version: 2016-2 Canceled Activities Status: Approved Activities without Modification Date of Last Change of Status: 04/11/2015 Public Disclosure Authorized Category Works: Activities ShowHide Total days of End of No Objection Publication / No Objection to Contract (between Bid Contract Description Reference # Province/State Documents Invitation Bid Opening Evaluation of Bids Evaluation Report Signature Date Opening and (Completed) P.P. - Executing Agency: 2016-2-DOLIDAR - Method: NCB (National Competitive 5.Construction of Sandhikhark-Dharapani- SNRTP-22-NCB-O-SNRTP-ARG-W-NCB-1.05- Lumbini Zone N/A 01/02/14 03/03/14 18/03/14 N/A 10/05/14 68 11/05/15 Maidan Rd. (08 Km) UG-070-71 DTO Arghakhanchi Contract under execution Post Review N/A 15/03/14 14/04/14 15/05/14 N/A 11/07/14 88 Public Disclosure Authorized 6. Construction of Sandhikhark-Nuwakot- SNRTP-23-NCB-O-SNRTP-ARG-W-NCB-1.06- Lumbini Zone N/A 01/02/14 03/03/14 18/03/14 N/A 10/05/14 68 11/05/15 Asurkot-Pyuthan Rd. (07 Km): UG-070-71 DTO Arghakhanchi Contract under execution Post Review N/A 15/03/14 15/04/14 14/05/14 N/A 15/07/14 91 3. Construction of Mandredhunga – SNRTP-80-NCB-O-SNRTP-NUW-W-NCB-16.03-Bagmati Zone N/A 17/01/14 16/02/14 03/03/14 N/A 02/05/14 75 10/12/15 Khargabhanjyang-Gorsyang –Dangsing Road UG-070-71 (12.00 km) DTO Nuwakot Contract under execution Post Review N/A 04/03/14 06/04/14 14/05/14 N/A 30/05/14 54 1.
  • Saath-Saath Project

    Saath-Saath Project

    Saath-Saath Project Saath-Saath Project THIRD ANNUAL REPORT August 2013 – July 2014 September 2014 0 Submitted by Saath-Saath Project Gopal Bhawan, Anamika Galli Baluwatar – 4, Kathmandu Nepal T: +977-1-4437173 F: +977-1-4417475 E: [email protected] FHI 360 Nepal USAID Cooperative Agreement # AID-367-A-11-00005 USAID/Nepal Country Assistance Objective Intermediate Result 1 & 4 1 Table of Contents List of Acronyms .................................................................................................................................................i Executive Summary ............................................................................................................................................ 1 I. Introduction ........................................................................................................................................... 4 II. Program Management ........................................................................................................................... 6 III. Technical Program Elements (Program by Outputs) .............................................................................. 6 Outcome 1: Decreased HIV prevalence among selected MARPs ...................................................................... 6 Outcome 2: Increased use of Family Planning (FP) services among MARPs ................................................... 9 Outcome 3: Increased GON capacity to plan, commission and use SI ............................................................ 14 Outcome
  • Extensive Bamboo Production-To-Consumption Systems in Eastern Nepal: a Case Study

    Extensive Bamboo Production-To-Consumption Systems in Eastern Nepal: a Case Study

    Extensive Bamboo Production-to-Consumption Systems in Eastern Nepal: a Case Study INBAR Working Paper No. 17 Madhav B. Karki International Development Research Centre (IDRC), New Delhi, India Gopal R. Sherchan Forest Research and Survey Centre, Kathmandu, Nepal Jay Bahadur S. Karki Tribhuvan University Institute of Forestry, Pokhara, Nepal International Network for Bamboo and Rattan (INBAR) Forest Research and Survey Centre, Nepal Tribhuvan University, Institute of Forestry, Nepal International Network for Bamboo and Rattan 1998 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopy, recording or any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher. The presentation of material in this publication and in maps which appear herein does not imply the expression of any opinion on the part of INBAR. concerning the legal status of any country, or the delineation of frontiers or boundaries. ISBN U-86247-34-3 Designed and Printed by: Artstock, New Delhi, INDIA CONTENTS FOREWORD INTRODUCTION Overview Resource Distribution Bamboo as an Economic Crop Production and Consumption Major Uses of Bamboo Constraints and Potential of the Bamboo Sector CASE STUDY FRAMEWORK AND METHODS Theoretical Considerations 7 Framework 8 Objectives 8 Study Area 9 Data Collection 15 Research Methods 16 CASE STUDY FINDINGS 17 General Findings 17 Development Options 27 Policy and Institutional Issues 30 IMPLICATIONS OF THE STUDY 31 Major highlights 31 Implications of the Findings 31 Consequences and Outcome Analyses 33 RECOMMENDATIONS 35 Major Recommendations 35 An Indicative List of Investment Projects 36 REFERENCES 38 FURTHER READING 39 ANNEXE 40 1 FOREWORD Nepal - with its rugged terrain, under-developed infrastructure, burgeoning popu- lation, poor communication links, limited human resource base, low literacy, deteriorating forests, etc.
  • Terai Flood | August 2017

    Terai Flood | August 2017

    NEPAL Terai Flood | August 2017 A REPORT ON THE FOOD SECURITY IMPACT OF THE 2017 FLOOD IN THE TERAI Comprehensive report based on the results of ad hoc District Food Security Network (DFSN) meetings in 15 districts (23-29 August and 9-17 September 2017) Background Heavy monsoon rainfall during 10-13 August 2017 triggered severe flash floods and land- Figure 1: Water level of Ruikhola river at Bankatta. Source: DHM slides in 35 out of 75 districts in Nepal (see Figures 1 and 2). An Initial Rapid Assessment (IRA) conducted in 28 districts revealed that floods and landslides claimed 141 lives, injured 117 persons, displaced 460,900 people, and left 24 missing. Damage to houses, infrastruc- tures, and productive resources was severe; roughly 65,000 houses were completely de- stroyed and 120,100 houses were partially damaged (Nepal Red Cross Society, IRA Compi- lation Report, 20 August 2017). The southern Terai plains were critically affected by the floods and experienced severe hu- manitarian implications in terms of damage to houses, displacement, food security, health and sanitation, access to basic services, and losses in agricultural production. The Ministry of Agricultural Development (MoAD) has estimated 57 million USD in losses of major crops in 30 districts, of which approximately 56.7 million USD in losses occurred in Terai districts. A quick nutrition assessment conducted by the Nutrition Cluster reported high levels of undernutrition (wasting) in the flood-affected Terai districts. NeKSAP undertook a 72-hour assessment of the flood using satellite images, the IRA, sec- ondary data, and field information. The results indicated that Saptari, Rautahat, Mahottari, Bardiya and Banke were the most flood-affected districts, followed by Sarlahi, Siraha, Parsa and Dhanusha (Nepal Terai Flood Update Version 2.0).
  • A Report on Food Security Impact of 2017 Flood in Terai

    A Report on Food Security Impact of 2017 Flood in Terai

    NEPAL Terai Flood | August 2017 A REPORT ON FOOD SECURITY IMPACT OF 2017 FLOOD IN TERAI Based on the results of ad hoc District Food Security Network (DFSN) meetings in 10 districts (23-29 August 2017) http://www.nepalitimes.com/blogs/thebrief/ Background Heavy monsoon rainfall during 10-13 August 2017 triggered severe flash floods Figure 1: Water level of Babai river at Chepang. Source: DHM and landslides in 32 out of 75 districts in Nepal (see Figures 1 and 2). An Initial Rapid Assessment conducted in 28 districts revealed that floods and landslides claimed 141 lives, injured 117 persons, displaced 460,900 people, and left 24 missing. Damage to houses, infrastructures, and productive resources was severe; roughly 65,000 houses were completely destroyed and 120,100 houses were par- tially damaged (Nepal Red Cross Society, IRA Compilation Report, 20 August 2017). The southern Terai plains were critically affected by the floods and experienced severe humanitarian implications in terms of damage to houses, displacement, food security, health and sanitation, access to basic services, and losses in agricul- tural production. The Ministry of Agricultural Development (MoAD) has estimated 57 million USD in losses of major crops in 30 districts, of which approximately 56.7 million USD in losses occurred in Terai districts. A quick nutrition assessment con- ducted by the Nutrition Cluster and District Public Health Offices reported high levels of undernutrition (wasting) in the flood-affected Terai districts. NeKSAP undertook a 72-hour assessment of the flood using satellite images, the IRA, secondary data, and field information. The results indicated that Saptari, Rau- tahat, Mahottari, Bardiya and Banke were most flood-affected districts, followed by Sarlahi, Siraha, Parsa and Dhanusha (Nepal Terai Flood Update Version 2.0).
  • World Bank Document

    World Bank Document

    Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized procurement planisirrelevantthisstage. at Since thisisanongoing project,thatstartedinApril 2014,submissionaseparate ofsummary Strengthening the National Rural Transport Program theNationalRuralTransport(P132750) Strengthening PROCUREMENT Nepal : Project for Strengthening the National Rural Transport Program PLAN General Information Country: Nepal Bank’s Approval Date of the Original Procurement Plan: 2017-10-18 Revised Plan Date(s): (comma delineated, leave blank if none)2018-10-02 Project ID: P132750 GPN Date: Project Name: Project for Strengthening the National Rural Transport Program Loan / Credit No: IDA / 53360, IDA / H8990 Executing Agency(ies):Department of Local Infrastructure Development and Agricultural Roads WORKS Bid Evaluation Activity Reference No. / Draft Bidding Loan / Credit Market Procurement Prequalification Actual Amount Process Draft Pre-qualification Prequalification Specific Procurement Bidding Documents Proposal Submission / Report and Description Component Review Type Method Document / Signed Contract Contract Completion No. Approach Process (Y/N) (US$) Status Documents Evaluation Report Notice / Invitation as Issued Opening / Minutes Recommendation for Justification Award Planned Actual Planned Actual Planned Actual Planned Actual Planned Actual Planned Actual Planned Actual Planned Actual Planned Actual SNRTP-KAN-W-NCB-10.04- UG-070-71 / Kanchanpur: Single Stage - One IDA / 53360 Prior Request for
  • Global Initiative on Out-Of-School Children

    Global Initiative on Out-Of-School Children

    ALL CHILDREN IN SCHOOL Global Initiative on Out-of-School Children NEPAL COUNTRY STUDY JULY 2016 Government of Nepal Ministry of Education, Singh Darbar Kathmandu, Nepal Telephone: +977 1 4200381 www.moe.gov.np United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO), Institute for Statistics P.O. Box 6128, Succursale Centre-Ville Montreal Quebec H3C 3J7 Canada Telephone: +1 514 343 6880 Email: [email protected] www.uis.unesco.org United Nations Children´s Fund Nepal Country Office United Nations House Harihar Bhawan, Pulchowk Lalitpur, Nepal Telephone: +977 1 5523200 www.unicef.org.np All rights reserved © United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF) 2016 Cover photo: © UNICEF Nepal/2016/ NShrestha Suggested citation: Ministry of Education, United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF) and United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO), Global Initiative on Out of School Children – Nepal Country Study, July 2016, UNICEF, Kathmandu, Nepal, 2016. ALL CHILDREN IN SCHOOL Global Initiative on Out-of-School Children © UNICEF Nepal/2016/NShrestha NEPAL COUNTRY STUDY JULY 2016 Tel.: Government of Nepal MINISTRY OF EDUCATION Singha Durbar Ref. No.: Kathmandu, Nepal Foreword Nepal has made significant progress in achieving good results in school enrolment by having more children in school over the past decade, in spite of the unstable situation in the country. However, there are still many challenges related to equity when the net enrolment data are disaggregated at the district and school level, which are crucial and cannot be generalized. As per Flash Monitoring Report 2014- 15, the net enrolment rate for girls is high in primary school at 93.6%, it is 59.5% in lower secondary school, 42.5% in secondary school and only 8.1% in higher secondary school, which show that fewer girls complete the full cycle of education.
  • (Covid-19) Health Cluster Coordination Meeting

    (Covid-19) Health Cluster Coordination Meeting

    #20_CORONAVIRUS DISEASE (COVID-19) HEALTH CLUSTER COORDINATION MEETING 20TH AUGUST 2020 (2 PM) DR LUNGTEN Z. WANGCHUK CLUSTER CO-LEAD COVID 19 AFFECTED DISTRICTS NUMBER OF PCR TESTING SITES / WEEK Total No. of Additional Total No. of 40 Labs in labs last labs this labs this 38 provinces week week week 35 Province 1 3 1 4 28 28 Province 2 3 0 3 25 26 21 22 22 22 Bagmati 19 19 20 20 18 1 19 18 15 16 13 Gandaki 2 0 2 11 Province 5 6 0 6 1 2 Karnali 4 0 4 Sudurpachi 2 0 2 m Total Labs 38 2 40 No. of PCR testing sites 7th August – 19th August, 2020 NUMBER OF PCR POSITIVE FOR COVID-19/ WEEK CumulativeCumulative No.No. of PCRPCR teststests and and positive positive results results per per week week 575000 55438830000 16000 28938 28000 13850 140 14000 26000 475000 2443212024000 12000 22000 21390 375000 10020000 10000 19273 Nationally 18094 18000 17177 16423 82 8016000 - 554388 Tests done 2750008000 - 28938 Tested 14046 14000 6012000 Positive for 6000 54 175000 10728 10000 45 COVID-19 408000 4000 7177 6000 75000 4364 20 2000 16 4000 2300 9 2000 3 886 5 -250000 1 11 1 11 1 11 1 1 1 3 1 5 91 16 451 54 821 243427 0 0 Week 5 Week 6 Week 7 Week 8 Week 9 Week Week Week Week Week Week Week Week Week Week 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 Total PCR done Positive cases th Total PCR done Positive cases 7 August – 19th August, 2020 # Laboratory 1 National Public Health Laboratory 21 Central Diagnostic Laboratory and Research Center, Kamalpokhari 2 B.
  • Study to Identify Appropriate Approach and Strategies for Sustainable Sanitation Intervention in Terai

    Study to Identify Appropriate Approach and Strategies for Sustainable Sanitation Intervention in Terai

    Study to Identify Appropriate Approach and Strategies for Sustainable Sanitation Intervention in Terai Prepared by Bishwa N Paudyal Senior Consultant P O Box: 7162, Kathmandu Tel: +977-1-5000572, 9851146055 For ESDMS/DWSS Panipokhari, Kathmandu, Nepal Table of Contents Abbreviations .................................................................................................................................. 4 CHAPTER – I: CONTEXT AND METHODOLOGY ................................................................................ 5 1. BACKGROUND: ........................................................................................................................ 5 2. SCOPE OF STUDY: .................................................................................................................... 6 3. METHODOLOGY:...................................................................................................................... 6 3.1. STUDY AREA:........................................................................................................................ 7 3.2. METHODS AND TOOLS: ....................................................................................................... 8 CHAPTER – II: COUNTRY CONTEXT AND FINDINGS ....................................................................... 10 1. COUNTRY CONTEXT:.............................................................................................................. 10 1.1 WASH IN NEPAL................................................................................................................

  • A Trimester Newsletter of Paf Vol 4

    PAF gets new VC 3 8 PO/CO Corner 4 District Focus - Jumla Sectoral Focus: Enhancing 9 Rural Access for the Poor Article : PAF Operation in 5 Protected Areas 10 Titibits 6 Success Stories INSIDE 12 PAF in Brief Wives create employment for husbands Women of Kadal village of Khirsain plantations can be seen everywhere - 9 in the remote and poor far- in the village, where a large stretch western district of Doti, who were of land in the past used to remain ever pushed to disadvantaged unused and barren. position and braved exclusion, have won a sharp turn in their lives in “Working as a community guard in recent years. These days they are Mumbai, my husband used to remit earning enough and running their just Rs 10,000 to Rs 15,000 in a year. households, assuming the decision But working together in farm, me and making role and leading changes in my husband make Rs 40,000 in just the family as well as community. one season,” says Dusa Devi Ayer of Kadal. That is not all. They have even started to compel their husbands Her husband Tek Bahadur Ayer too working in India to earn living to is happy with the income and is return home to work in the income readily working for his wife in the generating activities they started. farms. “I never imagined we could make decent earning in the village Opportunities to make decent itself. In Mumbai I used to serve income have surfaced in the village other. Back home, I am helping my mainly after women in the village wife and have become self- jumped into commercial vegetables employed,” says Tek Bahadur.