DOCSLIB.ORG

District Disaster Risk Management Plan for Siraha District

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
District Disaster Risk Management Plan for Siraha District Ministry of Agriculture Food and Agriculture and Cooperatives (MOAC) Organization of the United Nations Disaster Risk Management Plan Siraha District April 2011 Priority Framework for Action Climate Change Adaptation and Disaster Risk Management in Agriculture Publisher: Government of Nepal Ministry of Agriculture and Cooperatives Kathmandu, Nepal Copyright: April 2011 Ministry of Agriculture and Cooperatives Government of Nepal Prepared under the FAO Technical Assistance to the Government of Nepal (TCP/NEP/3201 (D) and UNJP/NEP/OO5/UNJ) 2 Table of Contents Acronyms and Abbreviations Preface Executive Summary Pages 1. Introduction ....................................................................................................... 1 1.1. The Rationale for District Disaster Risk Management Plans ................................ 1 1.2. Objectives of the Siraha DDRMP .................................................................... 1 1.3. Methodology ................................................................................................. 4 1.3.1. Framework for DDRMP Preparation ............................................................ 4 1.3.2. Building the picture – Assessing the disaster context in Siraha ........................ 4 1.3.3. Data collection methods ............................................................................. 6 1.4. Layout of the Plan ......................................................................................... 9 1.5. The DDRMP in application........................................................................... 10 1.5.1. DDRMP as a Planning Document .............................................................. 10 1.5.2. Assumptions of the DDRMP ..................................................................... 10 2. DDRMP in context ............................................................................................ 11 2.1. Background ................................................................................................ 11 2.1.1. Risk of Disasters in Nepal ......................................................................... 11 2.1.2. National Scenario of Disasters ................................................................... 11 2.1.3. Agricultural Loss due to Disasters ............................................................. 12 2.1.4. Disasters and Climate Change ................................................................... 13 2.2. Institutional responses to disasters ................................................................. 14 2.2.1. International Framework and conventions................................................... 14 2.2.2. Implementation Strategy and Follow Up ..................................................... 16 2.3. Linking the National Strategy to the District Context ....................................... 17 3. Siraha DDRMP ................................................................................................... 18 3.1. Introduction to Siraha ................................................................................... 18 3.1.1. Geo-physical Settings............................................................................... 18 3.1.2. Configuration of Social Fabric .................................................................. 20 3.1.3. Natural Resource Endowment ................................................................... 20 3.1.4. Natural and Historical Landmarks ............................................................. 21 3.1.5. Livelihood Assets .................................................................................... 21 3.2. District Disaster Scenario ............................................................................. 22 3.2.1. Hazard analysis: Prioritization of hazards in the District ............................... 22 3.3. Impacts and Vulnerability Assessment ........................................................... 25 3.4. District Capacity Assessment ........................................................................ 31 3.4.1. Livelihood Assets .................................................................................... 31 3.4.2. Natural Resource Endowments .................................................................. 32 3.4.3. Household-level capabilities ..................................................................... 33 3.4.4. Public Service Facilities ........................................................................... 35 3.4.5. Institutional Capacity ............................................................................... 36 3.5. Action Plan ................................................................................................. 51 3.5.1. District priorities on disaster risk reduction ................................................. 51 3.5.2. Linkage between district and the National Priorities ..................................... 51 3.5.3. Overall recommendations ......................................................................... 53 3.6. Hazard Focus .............................................................................................. 54 3.7. Detailed Plan of Activities ............................................................................ 55 4. References ........................................................................................................ 67 5. Annexes ............................................................................................................ 70 Annex 1: Summary of National Plan for Disaster Risk Management ................................ 71 Annex 2: Standard Operating Procedures for District Departments and Agencies .............. 73 Annex 3: Schedule of Program .................................................................................... 80 Annex 4: Participants of PVA Exercise in Siraha District ......................................... 81 Annex 5: Field Tools Used for Detailed Planning ..................................................... 84 Annex 6: Contact Lists of Service Institutions ............................................................... 86 Annex 7: Central Level Cluster Details ....................................................................... 111 Annex 8: Name list of District Implementation Task Group (DTITG) ............................ 116 ii List of Tables Table 1: Aim, goals and objectives of Siraha's DDRMP inline with the HFA and National Strategy for Disaster Risk Management (NSDRM) in Nepal ................................................ 3 Table 2: Steps to assessing the disaster context of Siraha .................................................................. 5 Table 3: Information collection and management .............................................................................. 8 Table 4: Summary of Disaster Events between 1971 and 2007 in Nepal (Source: Dis-Inventar Database, NSET) ................................................................................................................. 12 Table 5: Major Losses in Agricultural Sector by Natural Disasters ................................................. 12 Table 6: Status of flood damage on major crops in Nepal during 2004 ((Bimonthly Bulletin of Crop and Livestock Situation, ABPSD and MoAC 2004) .................................................. 13 Table 7: Implementation of the strategy: Responsibility and Use by Different Stakeholders.......... 16 Table 8: National Strategy Priority Sectors ...................................................................................... 17 Table 9: Siraha (Lahan) climate ....................................................................................................... 18 Table 10: Siraha (Siraha) climate ..................................................................................................... 19 Table 11: Siraha (Lahan) Climate - graph ........................................................................................ 19 Table 12: Siraha (Siraha) climate - graph ......................................................................................... 20 Table 13: Topographical Distribution and Land Use (Area in ha.) (DADO 2009) .......................... 20 Table 14: Important Historical Landmarks in Siraha ....................................................................... 21 Table 15: Identified Hazards in the District ..................................................................................... 22 Table 16: Historical Account of major floods in Siraha ................................................................... 23 Table 17: Epidemic prone VDCs in Siraha District ......................................................................... 24 Table 18: Prioritized Hazards in Siraha District ............................................................................... 24 Table 19: Siraha priority hazards...................................................................................................... 25 Table 20: Siraha hazard calendar ..................................................................................................... 25 Table 21: Impacts and Vulnerability on Agriculture and Food Security .......................................... 26 Table 22: Impacts and Vulnerability on Health ................................................................................ 27 Table 23: Impacts and Vulnerability on Education .......................................................................... 28 Table 24: Impacts
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 1 Fao/Global Environment Facility Project Document
    FAO/GLOBAL ENVIRONMENT FACILITY PROJECT DOCUMENT Project title: Reducing vulnerability and increasing adaptive capacity to respond to impacts of climate change and variability for sustainable livelihoods in agriculture sector in Nepal Project Symbol: GCP/NEP/071/LDF Recipient Country: Nepal Resource Partner: Global Environment Facility (GEF) FAO Project ID: 616181 GEF Project ID: 5111 Government/other counterparts: Ministry of Agricultural Development (MOAD), Department of Agriculture (DOA), Department of Livestock Services (DLS), Nepal Agricultural Research Council (NARC) and Department of Hydrology and Meteorology (DHM) Expected OED (Starting Date): January 2015 Expected NTE (End date): December 2018 Contribution to FAO’s Strategic objective/Organizational Result: SO2: Increase and improve Strategic Framework: provision of goods and services from agriculture, forestry and fisheries in a sustainable manner. Organizational Outcomes 1 (output 1.1 and 1.2) Country Programming Framework Outcome: 4.3 (CLIMATE CHANGE): Institutional and technical capacities for adaptation to climate change in agriculture strengthened and adaptive capacity of vulnerable communities enhanced. GEF Focal Area/LDCF/SCCF: Least Developed Country Fund GEF/LDCF/SCCF Strategic Objectives: CCA1: Reducing vulnerability – Reduce vulnerability to the adverse impacts of climate change, including variability, at local, national, regional and global level CCA2: Increasing Adaptive Capacity: Increase adaptive capacity to respond to the impacts of climate change, including variability, at local, national, regional and global level CCA3: Adaptation Technology Transfer: Promote transfer and adoption of adaptation technology Environment impact assessment Category: A B C √ Financing Plan: GEF/LDCF/SCCF allocation USD 2,689,498 Co-financing FAO/UTF USD 8,620,000 FAO/MTF USD 1,170,000 Government USD 3,200,000 Sub-total Co-Financing: USD 12,990,000 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Nepal is one of the most vulnerable countries to climate change impacts.
    [Show full text]
  • Code Under Name Girls Boys Total Girls Boys Total 010290001
    P|D|LL|S G8 G10 Code Under Name Girls Boys Total Girls Boys Total 010290001 Maiwakhola Gaunpalika Patidanda Ma Vi 15 22 37 25 17 42 010360002 Meringden Gaunpalika Singha Devi Adharbhut Vidyalaya 8 2 10 0 0 0 010370001 Mikwakhola Gaunpalika Sanwa Ma V 27 26 53 50 19 69 010160009 Phaktanglung Rural Municipality Saraswati Chyaribook Ma V 28 10 38 33 22 55 010060001 Phungling Nagarpalika Siddhakali Ma V 11 14 25 23 8 31 010320004 Phungling Nagarpalika Bhanu Jana Ma V 88 77 165 120 130 250 010320012 Phungling Nagarpalika Birendra Ma V 19 18 37 18 30 48 010020003 Sidingba Gaunpalika Angepa Adharbhut Vidyalaya 5 6 11 0 0 0 030410009 Deumai Nagarpalika Janta Adharbhut Vidyalaya 19 13 32 0 0 0 030100003 Phakphokthum Gaunpalika Janaki Ma V 13 5 18 23 9 32 030230002 Phakphokthum Gaunpalika Singhadevi Adharbhut Vidyalaya 7 7 14 0 0 0 030230004 Phakphokthum Gaunpalika Jalpa Ma V 17 25 42 25 23 48 030330008 Phakphokthum Gaunpalika Khambang Ma V 5 4 9 1 2 3 030030001 Ilam Municipality Amar Secondary School 26 14 40 62 48 110 030030005 Ilam Municipality Barbote Basic School 9 9 18 0 0 0 030030011 Ilam Municipality Shree Saptamai Gurukul Sanskrit Vidyashram Secondary School 0 17 17 1 12 13 030130001 Ilam Municipality Purna Smarak Secondary School 16 15 31 22 20 42 030150001 Ilam Municipality Adarsha Secondary School 50 60 110 57 41 98 030460003 Ilam Municipality Bal Kanya Ma V 30 20 50 23 17 40 030460006 Ilam Municipality Maheshwor Adharbhut Vidyalaya 12 15 27 0 0 0 030070014 Mai Nagarpalika Kankai Ma V 50 44 94 99 67 166 030190004 Maijogmai Gaunpalika
    [Show full text]
  • Contract for Consultant's Services
    1-2 Province Government Province No.2 Ministry of Physical Infrastructure Development Janakpurdham REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS for Selection of Consulting Services for: Feasibility Study of Madheshi Sahid Marg (East-West Highway) RFP No.: MoPID/P2/FS/R/03/2077/078 Financing Agency: Province Government Package No.: Three Chainage: From 162+600 to 238+430 Km District: Sarlahi and Rautahat Road Section: Sarlahi and Rautahat Consultant's Name and address: May 2021 TABLE OF CONTENTS Section 1 – Letter of Invitation Section 2 – Instructions to Consultants and Data Sheet Section 3 – Technical Proposal – Standard Forms Section 4 – Financial Proposal – Standard Forms Section 5 – Eligible Countries Section 6 – Corrupt and Fraudulent Practices Section 7–Terms of Reference Section 8– Conditions of Contract and Contract Forms ii TABLE OF CLAUSES PART I Section 1. Letter of Invitation Section 2. Instructions to Consultants and Data Sheet A. General Provisions 1.Definitions 2.Introduction 3.Conflict of Interest 4.Unfair Competitive Advantage 5.Corrupt and Fraudulent Practices 6.Eligibility B. Preparation of Proposals 7.General Considerations 8.Cost of Preparation of Proposal 9.Language 10.Documents Comprising the Proposal 11.Only One Proposal 12.Proposal Validity 13.Clarification and Amendment of RFP 14.Preparation of Proposals – Specific Considerations 15.Technical Proposal Format and Content 16.Financial Proposal C. Submission, Opening and Evaluation 17.Submission, Sealing, and Marking of Proposals 18.Confidentiality 19.Opening of Technical Proposals 20.Proposals Evaluation 21.Evaluation of Technical Proposals 22.Financial Proposals for QBS 23.Public Opening of Financial Proposals (for QCBS, FBS, and LCS methods) 24.Correction of Errors 25.Taxes iii 1-iv 26.Conversion to Single Currency 27.Combined Quality and Cost Evaluation 28.Negotiations 29.Conclusion of Negotiations 30.Award of Contract D.
    [Show full text]
  • Food Insecurity and Undernutrition in Nepal
    SMALL AREA ESTIMATION OF FOOD INSECURITY AND UNDERNUTRITION IN NEPAL GOVERNMENT OF NEPAL National Planning Commission Secretariat Central Bureau of Statistics SMALL AREA ESTIMATION OF FOOD INSECURITY AND UNDERNUTRITION IN NEPAL GOVERNMENT OF NEPAL National Planning Commission Secretariat Central Bureau of Statistics Acknowledgements The completion of both this and the earlier feasibility report follows extensive consultation with the National Planning Commission, Central Bureau of Statistics (CBS), World Food Programme (WFP), UNICEF, World Bank, and New ERA, together with members of the Statistics and Evidence for Policy, Planning and Results (SEPPR) working group from the International Development Partners Group (IDPG) and made up of people from Asian Development Bank (ADB), Department for International Development (DFID), United Nations Development Programme (UNDP), UNICEF and United States Agency for International Development (USAID), WFP, and the World Bank. WFP, UNICEF and the World Bank commissioned this research. The statistical analysis has been undertaken by Professor Stephen Haslett, Systemetrics Research Associates and Institute of Fundamental Sciences, Massey University, New Zealand and Associate Prof Geoffrey Jones, Dr. Maris Isidro and Alison Sefton of the Institute of Fundamental Sciences - Statistics, Massey University, New Zealand. We gratefully acknowledge the considerable assistance provided at all stages by the Central Bureau of Statistics. Special thanks to Bikash Bista, Rudra Suwal, Dilli Raj Joshi, Devendra Karanjit, Bed Dhakal, Lok Khatri and Pushpa Raj Paudel. See Appendix E for the full list of people consulted. First published: December 2014 Design and processed by: Print Communication, 4241355 ISBN: 978-9937-3000-976 Suggested citation: Haslett, S., Jones, G., Isidro, M., and Sefton, A. (2014) Small Area Estimation of Food Insecurity and Undernutrition in Nepal, Central Bureau of Statistics, National Planning Commissions Secretariat, World Food Programme, UNICEF and World Bank, Kathmandu, Nepal, December 2014.
    [Show full text]
  • Of Hetauda-Dhalkebar-Duhabi 400 Kv TL
    Updated Resettlement Action Plan (RAP) of Hetauda-Dhalkebar-Duhabi 400 kV TL Submitted To: Nepal India Electricity Transmission and Trade Project Hetauda-Dhalkebar-Duhabi 400 kV Transmission Line Nepal Electricity Authority Kharipati, Bhaktapur Prepared And Submitted By: Environment and Social Studies Department Engineering Services Directorate Nepal Electricity Authority Kharipati, Bhaktapur May, 2017 Updated Resettlemention Action Plan i ABBREVIATIONS CBO Community Based Organization CDO Chief District Officer CDC Compensation Determination Committee CFUG Community Forest User Group DADO District Agriculture Development Office DDC District Development Committee DFO District Forest Office DHO District Health Office EIA Environmental Impact Assessment EMF Electromagnetic Fields ESMF Environmental and Social Management Framework ESSD Environment and Social Studies Department FGD Focus Group Discussion GON Government of Nepal HEP Hydro Electric Project HH Household HDD-ESMU Hetauda-Dhalkebar-Duhabi Environnent & Social Mgmt. Unit INPS Integrated Nepal Power System IPP Independent Power Producers IRPA International Radiation Protection Association KIIs Key Informant Interviews km Kilometer kV Kilovolt LCF Local Consultative Forum LDO Local Development Officer LARU Land Acquisition and Rehabilitation Unit NEA Nepal Electricity Authority NRs. Nepalese Rupees NGO Non Governmental Organization PAF Project Affected Family PAP Project Affected Person PCU Program Coordination Unit PRA Participatory Rapid Appraisal RAP Resettlement Action Plan ROW
    [Show full text]
  • Resettlement Action Plan (RAP) of Hetauda-Dhalkebar-Duhabi 400 Kv and Dhalkebar-Bhittamod 400 Kv TL Project
    Resettlement Action Plan (RAP) of Hetauda-Dhalkebar-Duhabi 400 Public Disclosure Authorized kV And Dhalkebar-Bhittamod 400 kV TL Project (Angle Tower, Sub-stations and Structures) Public Disclosure Authorized Prepared And Submitted By: Public Disclosure Authorized Environment And Social Studies Department Engineering Services Nepal Electricity Authority Kharipati, Bhaktapur February, 2011 Public Disclosure Authorized Resettlemention Action Plan ABBREVIATIONS CBO Community Based Organization CDO Chief District Officer CDC Compensation Determination Committee CFUG Community Forest User Group DADO District Agriculture Development Office DDC District Development Committee DFO District Forest Office DHO District Health Office EIA Environmental Impact Assessment EMF Electromagnetic Fields ESMF Environmental and Social Management Framework ESSD Environment and Social Studies Department FGD Focus Group Discussion GON Government of Nepal HEP Hydro Electric Project HH Household HDD~ESMU Hetauda-D.halkebar-Duhabi Environnent & Social Mgmt. Unit INPS Integrated Nepal Power System IPP Independent Power Producers IRPA International Radiation Protection Association KlIs Key Informant Interviews km Kilometer kV Kilovolt LCF Local Consultative Forum LDO Local Development Officer LARU Land Acquisition and Rehabilitation Unit NEA Nepal Electricity Authority NRs. Nepalese Rupees NGO Non Governmental Organization PAF Project Affected Family PAP Project Affected Person PCU Program Coordination Unit PRA Participatory Rapid Appraisal RAP Resettlement Action
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental Assessment Document Initial Environmental Examination
    Environmental Assessment Document Initial Environmental Examination Loan Number: 2102 NEP August 2009 Nepal: Community-Managed Irrigated Agricultural Sector Project Mainawati Irrigation Sub-Project, Siraha Prepared by the Government of Nepal The Environmental Assessment is a document of the borrower. The views expressed herein do not necessarily represent those of ADB’s Board of Directors, Management, or staff, and may be preliminary in nature. Appendix J : Initial Environmental Examination (IEE) INITIAL ENVIRONMENTAL EXAMINATION MAINAWATI IRRIGATION SUB-PROJECT, SIRAHA DISTRICT I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1. This initial environmental examination (IEE) was undertaken for the Mainawati Irrigation Subproject under Community Managed Irrigated Agriculture Sector Project under ADB Loan 2102 NEP to meet the Asian Development Bank’s (ADB) requirements for environmental assessment process and documentation prior to Subproject approval, following the procedures in ADB’s Environmental Assessment Guidelines (2003), and the Project’s Environmental Assessment and Review Procedures. 2. The subproject does not pass through any environmentally sensitive ecological area. It is the rehabilitation of the existing irrigation scheme where the system is already in operation since many years. Apart from some construction related impacts, the subproject will have minimal impact on the environment. Hence the subproject has been categorized under Category B as per the Environment Assessment Policy, 2002. 3. This Initial Environmental Examination (IEE) was based on data collected during the Joint Walkthrough Survey. The objective of the IEE is to analyze the adverse environmental impacts arising from site selection, design, construction and operation of the subproject. The mitigation of any such effect to acceptable levels was sought through implementation of a set of clearly defined and costed mitigation measures which have been included in the cost estimates.
    [Show full text]
  • Council Notification Letter
    GLOBAL ENVIRONMENT FACILITY INVESTING IN OUR PLANET Naoko Ishii CEO and Chairperson March 18, 2015 Dear LDCF /SCCF Council Member: F AO as the Implementing Agency for the project entitled: Nepal: Reducing Vulnerability and Increasing Adaptive Capacity to Respond to Impacts of Climate Change and Variability for Sustainable Livelihoods in Agriculture Sector in Nepal has submitted the attached proposed project document for CEO endorsement prior to final approval of the project document in accordance. with F AO procedures. The Secretariat has reviewed the project document. It is consistent with the proposal approved by LDCF/SCCF Council in May 2013 and the proposed project remains consistent with the Instrument and LDCF/SCCF policies and procedures. The attached explanation prepared by F AO satisfactorily details how Council's comments have been addressed. I am, therefore, endorsing the project document. We have today posted the proposed project document on the GEF website at www.TheGEF.org. If you do not have access to the Web, you may request the local field office of UNDP or the World Bank to download the document for you. Alternatively, you may request a copy of the document from the Secretariat. If you make such a request, please confirm for us your current mailing address. Sincerely, Naoko Ishii Chief Executive Officer and Chairperson Attachment: GEFSEC Project Review Document Copy to: Country Operational Focal Point, GEF Agencies, STAP, Trustee 1818 H Street, NW• Washington, DC 20433 •USA Tel:+ 1 (202) 473 3202 - Fax:+ 1 (202) 522
    [Show full text]
  • Unheeded Agonies Women's Reproductive Rights Program (WRRP)
    1 2 Please purchase 'e-PDF Converter and Creator' on http://www.e-pdfconverter.com to remove this message. Published by Unheeded Agonies Women's Reproductive Rights Program (WRRP) A Study of Uterine Prolapse Prevalence and it's Causes in Centre for Agro-Ecology and Development (CAED) Siraha and Saptari Districts, Nepal Post Box 4555, Kathmandu, Nepal Phone: 0977 1 6632942 Email: [email protected] September, 2007 Citation: Pradhan, S. 2007. Unheeded Agonies - A Study on Uterine Prolapse Prevalence and it's Causes in Siraha and Saptari Districts. Women's Reproductive Rights Program (WRRP), Centre for Agro-Ecology and Development (CAED), Kathmandu, Nepal. Supported by Fastenopfer-The Swiss Catholic Lenten Fund Luzern, Switzerland. www.fastenopfer.ch Photoes by Women's Reproductive Rights Program (WRRP) WRRP/CAED Center for Agro-Ecology and Development (CAED) Kathmandu Cover Design by 2007 Pramod Dahal with friends Cover Sketch by Anonymous Layout Design by Bimal Bogati 3 4 Please purchase 'e-PDF Converter and Creator' on http://www.e-pdfconverter.com to remove this message. Acknowledgement Executive Summary On behalf of WRRP/CAED, I would like to thank the respondents, who, despite their busy time, provided hours of their valuable time to Reproductive morbidity is one of the major problems faced by Nepali tell us about their problem to make us understand their situation women. Uterine Prolapse (falling of womb) is one of the poignant issues better. This research is dedicated to them. Special thanks go to the of reproductive health. It is a consequence of multiple pregnancies intertwined with abject poverty and discriminatory practices against enumerators Ambika Devi Chaudhary, Bhikni Devi Chaudhary, women in the society.
    [Show full text]
  • TSLC PMT Result
    Page 62 of 132 Rank Token No SLC/SEE Reg No Name District Palika WardNo Father Mother Village PMTScore Gender TSLC 1 42060 7574O15075 SOBHA BOHARA BOHARA Darchula Rithachaupata 3 HARI SINGH BOHARA BIMA BOHARA AMKUR 890.1 Female 2 39231 7569013048 Sanju Singh Bajura Gotree 9 Gyanendra Singh Jansara Singh Manikanda 902.7 Male 3 40574 7559004049 LOGAJAN BHANDARI Humla ShreeNagar 1 Hari Bhandari Amani Bhandari Bhandari gau 907 Male 4 40374 6560016016 DHANRAJ TAMATA Mugu Dhainakot 8 Bali Tamata Puni kala Tamata Dalitbada 908.2 Male 5 36515 7569004014 BHUVAN BAHADUR BK Bajura Martadi 3 Karna bahadur bk Dhauli lawar Chaurata 908.5 Male 6 43877 6960005019 NANDA SINGH B K Mugu Kotdanda 9 Jaya bahadur tiruwa Muga tiruwa Luee kotdanda mugu 910.4 Male 7 40945 7535076072 Saroj raut kurmi Rautahat GarudaBairiya 7 biswanath raut pramila devi pipariya dostiya 911.3 Male 8 42712 7569023079 NISHA BUDHa Bajura Sappata 6 GAN BAHADUR BUDHA AABHARI BUDHA CHUDARI 911.4 Female 9 35970 7260012119 RAMU TAMATATA Mugu Seri 5 Padam Bahadur Tamata Manamata Tamata Bamkanda 912.6 Female 10 36673 7375025003 Akbar Od Baitadi Pancheswor 3 Ganesh ram od Kalawati od Kalauti 915.4 Male 11 40529 7335011133 PRAMOD KUMAR PANDIT Rautahat Dharhari 5 MISHRI PANDIT URMILA DEVI 915.8 Male 12 42683 7525055002 BIMALA RAI Nuwakot Madanpur 4 Man Bahadur Rai Gauri Maya Rai Ghodghad 915.9 Female 13 42758 7525055016 SABIN AALE MAGAR Nuwakot Madanpur 4 Raj Kumar Aale Magqar Devi Aale Magar Ghodghad 915.9 Male 14 42459 7217094014 SOBHA DHAKAL Dolakha GhangSukathokar 2 Bishnu Prasad Dhakal
    [Show full text]
  • Reducing Vulnerability and Increasing Adaptive Capacity To
    Project Evaluation Series 04/2020 Terminal evaluation of the project “Reducing vulnerability and increasing adaptive capacity to respond to impacts of climate change and variability for sustainable livelihoods in agriculture sector in Nepal” Project Evaluation Series 04/2020 Terminal evaluation of the project “Reducing vulnerability and increasing adaptive capacity to respond to impacts of climate change and variability for sustainable livelihoods in agriculture sector in Nepal” Project code: GCP/NEP/070/LDF GEF ID: 5111 FOOD AND AGRICULTURE ORGANIZATION OF THE UNITED NATIONS Rome, 2020 Required citation: FAO. 2020. Terminal evaluation of the project “Reducing vulnerability and increasing adaptive capacity to respond to impacts of climate change and variability for sustainable livelihoods in agriculture sector in Nepal”. Project Evaluation Series, 04/2020. Rome. The designations employed and the presentation of material in this information product do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) concerning the legal or development status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. Dashed lines on maps represent approximate border lines for which there may not yet be full agreement. The mention of specific companies or products of manufacturers, whether or not these have been patented, does not imply that these have been endorsed or recommended by FAO in preference to others of a similar nature that are not mentioned. The views expressed in this information product are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of FAO.
    [Show full text]
  • A Review of Simarongarh's History on Its Nexus Areas with References Of
    18 Prakash Darnal A Review of Simarongarh’s History on Its Nexus Areas with References of Archaeological Evidences Prakash Darnal Abstract After the Lichachhavi period, Nepal was bounded within the Kathmandu valley only. Sinja emerged as a powerful state in the west of Nepal. Likewise, Karnata dynasty became strong and powerful to the south of Nepal in the beginning of 10th and 11th century A. D. They were so strong and powerful that they attacked Kathmandu valley several times and plundered for the sake of wealth. So Simraongarh was once an important medieval kingdom of Nepal. It was established by Karnata dynasty Nanyadev in 1097 A. D. After capturing Mithila, Nanyadev began to rule it from Simraongarh. He has been credited in the records for the unification of Tirhut. Under the Karnatas Tirhut had developed on economic, social and cultural which was also known as golden age. They ruled over Mithila for about 227 years and after that Gayasuddin Tuglak conquered. Muslims ruled about three hundred years, and then it came under Sens of Makawanpur. Lohang Sen had extended his territories up to Vijayapur. When Prithivi Narayan Shah conquered Makawanpur in 1762 A. D. all part of eastern Terai including Tirhut or Mithila became integral part of Nepal. After the Anglo Nepal war in 1814 - 16 A.D., Nepal lost some parts of eastern Terai, it came again under its jurisdiction in Sugauli Treaty of 1816 A.D. But now people seem to forget Simarongarh which was once so rich and highly developed. Therefore, the objective of this article is not only to remind of its glorious past history but also to prove how important this area through archaeological findings.
    [Show full text]