DOCSLIB.ORG

1 Fao/Global Environment Facility Project Document

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
1 Fao/Global Environment Facility Project Document FAO/GLOBAL ENVIRONMENT FACILITY PROJECT DOCUMENT Project title: Reducing vulnerability and increasing adaptive capacity to respond to impacts of climate change and variability for sustainable livelihoods in agriculture sector in Nepal Project Symbol: GCP/NEP/071/LDF Recipient Country: Nepal Resource Partner: Global Environment Facility (GEF) FAO Project ID: 616181 GEF Project ID: 5111 Government/other counterparts: Ministry of Agricultural Development (MOAD), Department of Agriculture (DOA), Department of Livestock Services (DLS), Nepal Agricultural Research Council (NARC) and Department of Hydrology and Meteorology (DHM) Expected OED (Starting Date): January 2015 Expected NTE (End date): December 2018 Contribution to FAO’s Strategic objective/Organizational Result: SO2: Increase and improve Strategic Framework: provision of goods and services from agriculture, forestry and fisheries in a sustainable manner. Organizational Outcomes 1 (output 1.1 and 1.2) Country Programming Framework Outcome: 4.3 (CLIMATE CHANGE): Institutional and technical capacities for adaptation to climate change in agriculture strengthened and adaptive capacity of vulnerable communities enhanced. GEF Focal Area/LDCF/SCCF: Least Developed Country Fund GEF/LDCF/SCCF Strategic Objectives: CCA1: Reducing vulnerability – Reduce vulnerability to the adverse impacts of climate change, including variability, at local, national, regional and global level CCA2: Increasing Adaptive Capacity: Increase adaptive capacity to respond to the impacts of climate change, including variability, at local, national, regional and global level CCA3: Adaptation Technology Transfer: Promote transfer and adoption of adaptation technology Environment impact assessment Category: A B C √ Financing Plan: GEF/LDCF/SCCF allocation USD 2,689,498 Co-financing FAO/UTF USD 8,620,000 FAO/MTF USD 1,170,000 Government USD 3,200,000 Sub-total Co-Financing: USD 12,990,000 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Nepal is one of the most vulnerable countries to climate change impacts. Climate and its variability is already affecting Nepal’s agriculture sector. The climate related hazards like floods, drought, hailstorms, heat and cold waves; and pests and diseases, soil erosion, deforestation, desertification are recurring and pose severe threats to the sector. The poor and marginalized groups of people residing in the rural areas are usually hit hardest by the consequences of climate change and increasing frequency of natural hazards. Increasing trends of extreme climate events and natural disasters due to climate change could undermine future food security. Although the Government of Nepal has constantly responded to climate risks, a renewed focus on reducing vulnerability and increasing adaptive capacity to respond to impacts of climate change and variability is crucially needed to save agricultural livelihoods. In response to the request from the Government of Nepal, FAO has prepared the proposal aimed at strengthening institutional and technical capacities for reducing vulnerability and promoting climate- resilient practices, strategies and plans for effectively responding to the impacts of climate change and variability in agriculture sector. The project components include: (1) Strengthening of technical and institutional capacities and integrating adaptation into food and agriculture policies, strategies and plans; (2) Assessment, monitoring and providing advance early warning information on vulnerabilities,risks of climate change and agrometeorological forecasts to assist better adaptation planning; (3) Improving awareness, knowledge and communication on climate impacts and adaptation; (4) Prioritizing and implementing local investment for strengthened livelihoods and sources of income and transfer of relevant adaptation technology for reducing climate risks in agriculture. The LDCF project focuses four districts in two development regions: Eastern Development Region (Udayapur and Siraha) and Western Development Region (Argakhanchi and Kapilbastu). In general, the focus districts represent two eco-regions - mid-hills (Udayapur and Argakhanchi) and terai (Siraha, Kapilbastu). The project will employ a participatory learning and doing approach through farmer field schools at the local level to reduce the vulnerability and promote adaptive capacity to effectively respond to climate change impacts. The direct beneficiaries of the project are 120 farmer groups (~3000 farmers) in 24 selected Village Development Committees (VDC). The national level staff of MOAD, Department of Agriculture (DOA) and Department of Livestock Services (DLS) and district staff from DOA, DLS, Local Development, Department of Irrigation and Non-governmental Organizations (NGO)/Community Based Organizations (CBO) is the second level of beneficiaries through capacity development programmes. The project contributes to national priorities under National Adaptation Programme of Action (NAPA), National Agriculture Sector Development Priority (NASDP) and the Priority Framework of Action (2011 – 2020) (PFA) on Climate Change Adaptation and Disaster Risk Management of the Ministry of Agricultural Development (MOAD) and recently developed Agriculture Development Strategy (ADS) 2013. The project focuses the key elements of GEF LDCF objective CCA-1 on reducing vulnerability to adverse impacts of climate change and objective CCA-2 on increasing adaptive capacity to respond to the impacts of climate change and CCA-3 on adaptation technology transfer. The project is consistent with GEF Agency’s (FAO) Strategic Objective 2 (SO2): Increase and improve provision of goods and services from agriculture, forestry and fisheries in a sustainable manner, and Country Programming Framework (CPF) Outcome: 4.3 (climate change): Institutional and technical capacities for adaptation to climate change in agriculture strengthened and adaptive capacity of vulnerable communities enhanced. The project will be implemented for a period of 48 months (4 years) with a total budget of USD 15,679,498 of which USD 2,689,498 with GEF LDCF resources. 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION 1. RELEVANCE (STRATEGIC FIT AND RESULTS ORIENTATION) ...... 5 1.1 GENERAL CONTEXT .................................................................................................... 5 1.1.1 Rationale .................................................................................................................. 19 1.1.2 FAO’s comparative advantage ............................................................................ 2524 1.1.3 Participants and other stakeholders ..................................................................... 2625 1.1.4 Lessons learned from past and related work including evaluations .................... 3029 1.1.5 Links to national development goals, strategies, plans, policy and legislation, GEF/LDCF/SCCF and FAO’s Strategic Objectives .................................................... 3231 SECTION 2 – PROJECT FRAMEWORK AND EXPECTED RESULTS .................. 3534 2.1 PROJECT STRATEGY ............................................................................................. 3534 2.2 PROJECT OBJECTIVES .......................................................................................... 3534 2.3 EXPECTED PROJECT OUTCOMES....................................................................... 3534 2.4 PROJECT COMPONENTS AND OUTPUTS .......................................................... 3534 2.5 ADAPTATION BENEFITS ...................................................................................... 4443 2.6 COST EFFECTIVENESS (ALTERNATIVE STRATEGIES AND METHODOLOGIES CONSIDERED) ............................................................................ 4544 2.7 INNOVATIVENESS ................................................................................................. 4544 SECTION 3 – FEASIBILITY ........................................................................................... 4645 3.1 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT....................................................... 4645 3.2 RISK MANAGEMENT ............................................................................................. 4847 4.1 INSTITUTIONAL ARRANGEMENTS .................................................................... 4948 4.2 IMPLEMENTATION ARRANGEMENTS .............................................................. 5855 4.3 FINANCIAL PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT ................................................. 6461 4.3.1 Financial plan (by component, outputs and co-financier) ................................... 6461 4.3.2 GEF/LDCF/SCCF inputs .................................................................................... 6461 4.3.3 Government inputs .............................................................................................. 6461 4.4.4. FAO inputs ......................................................................................................... 6462 4.4.5 Other co-financiers inputs ................................................................................... 6562 4.4.6. Financial management of and reporting on GEF/LDCF/SCCF resources ......... 6562 4.4. PROCUREMENT ..................................................................................................... 6663 4.5 MONITORING AND REPORTING ......................................................................... 6664 4.5.1 Oversight and monitoring responsibilities ..................................................... 6764 3 4.5.2. Indicators and information sources ...................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Food Insecurity and Undernutrition in Nepal
    SMALL AREA ESTIMATION OF FOOD INSECURITY AND UNDERNUTRITION IN NEPAL GOVERNMENT OF NEPAL National Planning Commission Secretariat Central Bureau of Statistics SMALL AREA ESTIMATION OF FOOD INSECURITY AND UNDERNUTRITION IN NEPAL GOVERNMENT OF NEPAL National Planning Commission Secretariat Central Bureau of Statistics Acknowledgements The completion of both this and the earlier feasibility report follows extensive consultation with the National Planning Commission, Central Bureau of Statistics (CBS), World Food Programme (WFP), UNICEF, World Bank, and New ERA, together with members of the Statistics and Evidence for Policy, Planning and Results (SEPPR) working group from the International Development Partners Group (IDPG) and made up of people from Asian Development Bank (ADB), Department for International Development (DFID), United Nations Development Programme (UNDP), UNICEF and United States Agency for International Development (USAID), WFP, and the World Bank. WFP, UNICEF and the World Bank commissioned this research. The statistical analysis has been undertaken by Professor Stephen Haslett, Systemetrics Research Associates and Institute of Fundamental Sciences, Massey University, New Zealand and Associate Prof Geoffrey Jones, Dr. Maris Isidro and Alison Sefton of the Institute of Fundamental Sciences - Statistics, Massey University, New Zealand. We gratefully acknowledge the considerable assistance provided at all stages by the Central Bureau of Statistics. Special thanks to Bikash Bista, Rudra Suwal, Dilli Raj Joshi, Devendra Karanjit, Bed Dhakal, Lok Khatri and Pushpa Raj Paudel. See Appendix E for the full list of people consulted. First published: December 2014 Design and processed by: Print Communication, 4241355 ISBN: 978-9937-3000-976 Suggested citation: Haslett, S., Jones, G., Isidro, M., and Sefton, A. (2014) Small Area Estimation of Food Insecurity and Undernutrition in Nepal, Central Bureau of Statistics, National Planning Commissions Secretariat, World Food Programme, UNICEF and World Bank, Kathmandu, Nepal, December 2014.
    [Show full text]
  • Natural Resource, Market Demand and Target Group Analysis of Siraha District-Development Management Institute
    Published by: Micro-Enterprise Development Programme Ministry of Industry United Nations Development Programme June 2013 Copyright © 2013 Micro-Enterprise Development Programme (MEDEP)/UNDP All rights are reserved. No part of this edited volume may be reproduced by any means, nor transmitted, nor translated into a machine language without the written permission of the publisher. ISBN: 978-99946-916-6-1 Printed in Nepal at : Office Support Service Centre Chhapakhana P. Ltd. Teku, Kathmandu Tel.: 4240571 Email.: [email protected] Natural Resource, Market Demand and Target Group Analysis of Siraha District1 Abstract MEDEP was piloted in 1998. It expanded to 36 districts by 2010 in its third phase (2008-13). The development objective of the programme was to contribute to reduce poverty among low-income families in rural areas, and to ensure the institutional development and capacity building of local service delivery organizations to work as catalysts in the development of rural micro-enterprise sector. In order to reach its target group, MEDEP conducts natural resource, market demand and target group surveys in the new programme districts. As Siraha was added as a new programme district in the third phase, this study was conducted to furnish these information. On the basis of the major findings, this study concluded that Siraha district has a high potential of developing micro- enterprises to create employment and income-generating opportunities for the MEDEP's target groups. For implementation effectiveness and better results, MEDEP should concentrate its programme on 32 new VDCs clustered around six market centres. Entrepreneurs should be supported in marketing skill development, market survey and marketing.
    [Show full text]
  • Council Notification Letter
    GLOBAL ENVIRONMENT FACILITY INVESTING IN OUR PLANET Naoko Ishii CEO and Chairperson March 18, 2015 Dear LDCF /SCCF Council Member: F AO as the Implementing Agency for the project entitled: Nepal: Reducing Vulnerability and Increasing Adaptive Capacity to Respond to Impacts of Climate Change and Variability for Sustainable Livelihoods in Agriculture Sector in Nepal has submitted the attached proposed project document for CEO endorsement prior to final approval of the project document in accordance. with F AO procedures. The Secretariat has reviewed the project document. It is consistent with the proposal approved by LDCF/SCCF Council in May 2013 and the proposed project remains consistent with the Instrument and LDCF/SCCF policies and procedures. The attached explanation prepared by F AO satisfactorily details how Council's comments have been addressed. I am, therefore, endorsing the project document. We have today posted the proposed project document on the GEF website at www.TheGEF.org. If you do not have access to the Web, you may request the local field office of UNDP or the World Bank to download the document for you. Alternatively, you may request a copy of the document from the Secretariat. If you make such a request, please confirm for us your current mailing address. Sincerely, Naoko Ishii Chief Executive Officer and Chairperson Attachment: GEFSEC Project Review Document Copy to: Country Operational Focal Point, GEF Agencies, STAP, Trustee 1818 H Street, NW• Washington, DC 20433 •USA Tel:+ 1 (202) 473 3202 - Fax:+ 1 (202) 522
    [Show full text]
  • Reducing Vulnerability and Increasing Adaptive Capacity To
    Project Evaluation Series 04/2020 Terminal evaluation of the project “Reducing vulnerability and increasing adaptive capacity to respond to impacts of climate change and variability for sustainable livelihoods in agriculture sector in Nepal” Project Evaluation Series 04/2020 Terminal evaluation of the project “Reducing vulnerability and increasing adaptive capacity to respond to impacts of climate change and variability for sustainable livelihoods in agriculture sector in Nepal” Project code: GCP/NEP/070/LDF GEF ID: 5111 FOOD AND AGRICULTURE ORGANIZATION OF THE UNITED NATIONS Rome, 2020 Required citation: FAO. 2020. Terminal evaluation of the project “Reducing vulnerability and increasing adaptive capacity to respond to impacts of climate change and variability for sustainable livelihoods in agriculture sector in Nepal”. Project Evaluation Series, 04/2020. Rome. The designations employed and the presentation of material in this information product do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) concerning the legal or development status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. Dashed lines on maps represent approximate border lines for which there may not yet be full agreement. The mention of specific companies or products of manufacturers, whether or not these have been patented, does not imply that these have been endorsed or recommended by FAO in preference to others of a similar nature that are not mentioned. The views expressed in this information product are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of FAO.
    [Show full text]
  • NEPAL- Siraha District Fire Incident (As of 18 May 2012)
    NEPAL- Siraha District Fire Incident (as of 18 May 2012) Badahara Michaiyamal Legend Pipra Karjanha +$ District HQ Phulwariya Municipality Gamadaha Roads Ramnagar Michaiya Chandrodayapur Gobinapur Taregana Bridge Road; Highway Rampur Birta Mukashar Bishnupurkatti 8 Kalabanzaar Gautadi District Road Malhaniya Khori Feeder Road Chandra Lalpur Lalpur Other Road Maheshpur Pattar Dhodna Boundary Radhapur Bhediya International Boundary 7 Sitron Sitapur (Pra.Da.) Chandrayodhyapur Ashonpur District Boundary 5 6 Bhotraha VDC Boundary Itatar 3 Dumari Gamadaha Ayoudhanagar Houses Burnt Aurahi VDC 2 Majhauliya Lalpur Siraha 9 Ashokpur Wolkawa Govindapur Malahaniya Null Chikna Dhangadhi Barchawa Naraha Wolkawa 103 -135 Aurahi Bishnupur Rampurwa Kalyanpur Jaabdi Bhadaiya 302 - 410 Devipur Betauna Bashtipur Aurahi VDC Phulkaha Patti 26°45'0"N Durgapur Itari Parsahi Rajpur Siraha Hanumannagar (Pra.Dha.) Arnama Rampur Bishnupurmahishoth Mahanaur Bellhi Pathariyatharutole 26°37'30"N Chatari Bhawanipur Thalaha Kataha Harkatti Lahan Municipality 1 4 JanakpurN.P. Laxmipur (Pra.Ma.) Shukhipur LahanN.P. Shishbani Belaha Mohanpur Kamalpur Pipra (Dhanawar) Bhramhamangorchhari Aarnama Pokharbhinda Hanumannagar (Pra.Ma.) Gauripur Kushahallaxminiya Sarswor Shilorwa Sonmati Bhawanipurkalabanjar Kabilashi Maheshpur Gamahariya Bidhanagar Sitapur (Pra.Ra.) Gadha +$ Hakpara SirahaN.P. Krishnapur Laxmipur (Patari) Pipra Tulshipur Tenuwapatti Map Doc Name: Siraha Municipality Mahadewa Portaha Nepal_Seti_River_Flood_A4_18May_2012_v1 Mauwahi Khurkiyahi Sakhuwa Nankarkatti
    [Show full text]
  • Save the Children
    SAVE THE CHILDREN FINAL EVALUATION Save The Children (USA) Siraha District, Nepal Child Survival VII Project December 1994 Prepared by: Ms. Joan Venghaus Dr. A. Tariq Ihsan Karen LeBan Dr. Mahendra K. Chhetri Mr. Satya Bahadur Shresthal Agency for International Development Grant # AID-PDC-0500-G-00-1077-00 October 1, 1991 - December 30, 1994 SAVE THE CHILDREN (USA) Child Survival VII Project, Sirahi District, Nepal Final Evaluation Contents Page Selected Abbreviations 1 Acknowledgments 1 Executive Summary 2-3 1. PROJECT BACKGROUND and DESCRIPTION 4 -5 1I. FINAL EVALUATION II.A. Objectives 6 l.B. Evaluation Team 6 II.C. Schedule / Field Visits 7 1.D. Methodology 7 Ill. PROJECT OBJECTIVES 8-9 IV. PROJECT ACCOMPLISHMENTS and LESSONS LEARNED IV.A. Project Accomplishments A.1. Immunization 10-12 A2. Diarrheal Disease Management 13- 14 A.3. Vitamin A / Nutrition 15-17 A.4. Ante-Natal / Delivery Services 18 - 19 A.5. ARI 20-21 A.6. Family Planning 22- 23 A.7. Nonformal Education 24-26 A.8. Others (HIS) 27 IV.B. Project Expenditure B.1. Pipeline Analysis 28 B.2. Budget Comparison (DIP / Actual) 28 B.3. Handling of Finances 28-29 B.4. Lessons Learned (Project Expenditure) 29 IV.C. Lessons Learned 30 - 33 V. PROJECT SUSTAINABILITY V.A. Community Participation A. 1. Identification 34 A.2. Community Perception 34 A.3. Efforts to Enable Communities to Sustain Activities 34 A.4. Participation in Design, Implementation, Evaluation 34 - 35 A.5. Functioning Health Committees 35 A.6. Issues Addressed by Health Committees 35 A.7. Methods in Providing Direction 35 A.8.
    [Show full text]
  • Saath-Saath Project
    Saath-Saath Project Saath-Saath Project THIRD ANNUAL REPORT August 2013 – July 2014 September 2014 0 Submitted by Saath-Saath Project Gopal Bhawan, Anamika Galli Baluwatar – 4, Kathmandu Nepal T: +977-1-4437173 F: +977-1-4417475 E: [email protected] FHI 360 Nepal USAID Cooperative Agreement # AID-367-A-11-00005 USAID/Nepal Country Assistance Objective Intermediate Result 1 & 4 1 Table of Contents List of Acronyms .................................................................................................................................................i Executive Summary ............................................................................................................................................ 1 I. Introduction ........................................................................................................................................... 4 II. Program Management ........................................................................................................................... 6 III. Technical Program Elements (Program by Outputs) .............................................................................. 6 Outcome 1: Decreased HIV prevalence among selected MARPs ...................................................................... 6 Outcome 2: Increased use of Family Planning (FP) services among MARPs ................................................... 9 Outcome 3: Increased GON capacity to plan, commission and use SI ............................................................ 14 Outcome
    [Show full text]
  • Study to Identify Appropriate Approach and Strategies for Sustainable Sanitation Intervention in Terai
    Study to Identify Appropriate Approach and Strategies for Sustainable Sanitation Intervention in Terai Prepared by Bishwa N Paudyal Senior Consultant P O Box: 7162, Kathmandu Tel: +977-1-5000572, 9851146055 For ESDMS/DWSS Panipokhari, Kathmandu, Nepal Table of Contents Abbreviations .................................................................................................................................. 4 CHAPTER – I: CONTEXT AND METHODOLOGY ................................................................................ 5 1. BACKGROUND: ........................................................................................................................ 5 2. SCOPE OF STUDY: .................................................................................................................... 6 3. METHODOLOGY:...................................................................................................................... 6 3.1. STUDY AREA:........................................................................................................................ 7 3.2. METHODS AND TOOLS: ....................................................................................................... 8 CHAPTER – II: COUNTRY CONTEXT AND FINDINGS ....................................................................... 10 1. COUNTRY CONTEXT:.............................................................................................................. 10 1.1 WASH IN NEPAL................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • School Record 075-07-11.Xlsx
    EMIS Reported School 2075 School Total SN School Local Level District Code Students 1 150010001 Hari Bansha Pra V Shambhunath Nagarpalika Saptari 200 2 150010002 Rajowoti Adharbhut Vidyalaya Shambhunath Nagarpalika Saptari 717 3 150010003 Adharbhut Vidyalaya Satbedaha Shambhunath Nagarpalika Saptari 187 4 150020002 Basic S Bathanaha Dakneshwori Nagarpalika Saptari 227 5 150020003 Saraswati Ma V Aurhi Dakneshwori Nagarpalika Saptari 496 6 150030001 Janata Ni Ma V Kanchanroop Nagarpalika Saptari 260 7 150030002 Pra V Bhodaha Kanchanroop Nagarpalika Saptari 174 8 150040001 Madrassa Kashimul Ulum Pra V Bairwa Kanchanroop Nagarpalika Saptari 187 9 150040003 La Na U Ma V Bairwa Kanchanroop Nagarpalika Saptari 617 10 150050001 Sarbajanik Adharbhut Vidyalaya Mohanpur Agnisair Krishnasavaran Gaunpalika Saptari 237 Shree Adharbhut Bidyalaya Chapki 11 150050002 Agnisair Krishnasavaran Gaunpalika Saptari 193 Bakdhuwa-1,Saptari 12 150050003 Hirawati Adharbhut School Bakdhuwa-5 Agnisair Krishnasavaran Gaunpalika Saptari 220 13 150050004 Shree Ra. Secondary School Ratawala Agnisair Krishnasavaran Gaunpalika Saptari 244 14 150050005 Madarsa Darul Kuran Agnisair Krishnasavaran Gaunpalika Saptari 92 15 150060001 Pra V Mansapur Tilatha Koiladi Gaunpalika Saptari 264 16 150060003 Pra V Sadaipar Tilatha Koiladi Gaunpalika Saptari 195 17 150060004 Ma V Topa Tilatha Koiladi Gaunpalika Saptari 909 18 150060005 Harihar Hari Na Prv Sadepar Tilatha Koiladi Gaunpalika Saptari 101 19 150060008 Pathivara Ebs Tilatha Koiladi Gaunpalika Saptari 74 20 150070004 Ma V
    [Show full text]
  • Fb C/Ljgb S"Df/ /Fpt आडिल कुमारी गुप्ता जगन्नाथ स
    खुला प्रलतयोलगता配मक परीक्षाको वीकृ त नामावली वबज्ञापन नं. : २०७७/७८/२१ (प्रदेश नं. २) तह : ४ पदः सहायक रोल नं. उ륍मेदवारको नाम उ륍मेदवारको नाम ललंग सम्륍मललत हुन चाहेको समूह थायी म्ि쥍ला थायी न. पा. / गा.वव.स बािेको नाम बाबुको नाम 1 AACHAL RAUT cf+rn /fpt Female ख쥍ु ला, महिला, मधेशी Bara Nijgadh hgswf/L k|;fb c/ljGb s"df/ /fpt 2 AADALI KUMARI GUPTA आडिल कु मारी गुप्ता Female ख쥍ु ला, महिला, मधेशी Dhanusa Janakpur जगन्नाथ साह डिजय साह 3 AAISHA KHATOON cfO;f vft"g Female ख쥍ु ला, महिला, मधेशी Dhanusa Tarapatti Sirsiya dxdb cf]lndg dxdb /lkms 4 AAKASH KUMAR JHA cfsfz s"""df/ ‰mf Male ख쥍ु ला, मधेशी Dhanusa janakpurdham k"/Gb/ ‰mf clg?$ ‰mf 5 AAKRITI NIDHI आकृ डि डिडि Female ख쥍ु ला, महिला Dhanusa Janakpur हररिाथ डिडि सडु िल कु मार डिडि 6 AANAND KUMAR YADAV cfgGb s"df/ ofbj Male ख쥍ु ला, मधेशी Siraha Pipra Pra Pi d"lgnfn ofba dxfb]j ofbj 7 AARADHNA CHAUDHARY अराििा चौिरी Female ख쥍ु ला, महिला, मधेशी Mahottari Jaleshwar शभु करण चौिरी श्याम डकशोर चौिरी 8 AARATI KARN आरिी कणण Female ख쥍ु ला, महिला, मधेशी Dhanusa Tarapatti Sirsiya प्रमोद लाल कणण डिरेन्द्र लाल कण ण कायस्थ 9 AARTI CHAUDHARY आरिी चौिरी Female ख쥍ु ला, महिला, आहिवासी / जनजाति Bara Baragadi टुगर चौिरी zf]ef चौिरी 10 AARTI GIRI cf/lt lul/ Female ख쥍ु ला, महिला Dhanusa chhireswarnath v*\u axfb"/ lu/L kf]i^ axfb"/ lu/L 11 AARTI GUPTA आरिी गुप्ता Female ख쥍ु ला, महिला Parsa sabaithawa गौरी प्रसाद गुप्ता सरु ेश कु मार गुप्ता 12 AARTI KUMARI JHA cf/tL s'df/L emf Female ख쥍ु ला, महिला Dhanusa Laxmipur Bageba afn s[ifण emf OGb| gf/fo)f emf 13 AARTI KUMARI SHRESTHA cf/lt s"df/L >]i& Female ख쥍ु ला, महिला,
    [Show full text]
  • District Disaster Risk Management Plan for Siraha District
    Ministry of Agriculture Food and Agriculture and Cooperatives (MOAC) Organization of the United Nations Disaster Risk Management Plan Siraha District April 2011 Priority Framework for Action Climate Change Adaptation and Disaster Risk Management in Agriculture Publisher: Government of Nepal Ministry of Agriculture and Cooperatives Kathmandu, Nepal Copyright: April 2011 Ministry of Agriculture and Cooperatives Government of Nepal Prepared under the FAO Technical Assistance to the Government of Nepal (TCP/NEP/3201 (D) and UNJP/NEP/OO5/UNJ) 2 Table of Contents Acronyms and Abbreviations Preface Executive Summary Pages 1. Introduction ....................................................................................................... 1 1.1. The Rationale for District Disaster Risk Management Plans ................................ 1 1.2. Objectives of the Siraha DDRMP .................................................................... 1 1.3. Methodology ................................................................................................. 4 1.3.1. Framework for DDRMP Preparation ............................................................ 4 1.3.2. Building the picture – Assessing the disaster context in Siraha ........................ 4 1.3.3. Data collection methods ............................................................................. 6 1.4. Layout of the Plan ......................................................................................... 9 1.5. The DDRMP in application..........................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Monsoon Preparedness Assessment: 14 Earthquake Affected Priority Districts and the Terai Districts
    MONSOON PREPAREDNESS ASSESSMENT: 14 EARTHQUAKE AFFECTED PRIORITY DISTRICTS AND THE TERAI DISTRICTS FINAL REPORT NEPAL 2016 Monsoon Preparedness Assessment, Nepal 2016 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The annual monsoon season typically occurs in Nepal during July and August, with heavy rains and winds damaging housing, roads and other infrastructure as well as bringing increased flood and landslide risk. Ahead of the 2016 monsoon, concerns were raised that destabilization in terrain conditions caused by the 2015 earthquakes could significantly increase the risk of landslides during monsoon rains, both in areas historically prone to landslides and flash floods and areas that have become susceptible following the earthquakes. Furthermore, heavy rains could trigger the movement of loose rubble accumulated by the co-seismic landslides that followed the earthquakes.1 In preparation for the 2016 monsoon, the Shelter Cluster was developing a contingency plan focusing on the 14 earthquake priority districts2, along with the 22 Terai districts3 that have in the past been affected by widespread flooding during monsoon seasons. This assessment was launched to inform this planning through a macro-level analysis secondary data to identify areas vulnerable to monsoon impacts and estimate potential caseloads; along with collection and analysis of primary data to understand expectations of assistance, level of preparation and potential coping strategies, with a specific focus on families living in emergency (tents/tarpaulin) or temporary (CGI) shelter. While addressing the assessment objectives, the study also generated findings on underlying vulnerabilities amongst populations at risk of monsoon impacts. Key findings are summarised below. Landslide hazard and flood risk mapping Using post 2015 earthquake landslide susceptibility data, the Village Development Committees (VDCs)4 across all 14 earthquake affected priority districts were classified as having low, medium or high landslide susceptibility5 (see Map 1).
    [Show full text]