A Legal Analysis of Aviation Security Under the International Legal Regime

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

A Legal Analysis of Aviation Security Under the International Legal Regime A Legal Analysis of Aviation Security under the International Legal Regime Presented by JUNG, SANG YOOL Faculty of Law Institute of Air and Space Law Mc Gill University, Montreal, Canada March 2005 A thesis submitted to McGill University in partial fulfillment of the requirements of the degree ofMaster of Laws (LL.M.) © JUNG, SANG-YOOL, 2005 Library and Bibliothèque et 1+1 Archives Canada Archives Canada Published Heritage Direction du Branch Patrimoine de l'édition 395 Wellington Street 395, rue Wellington Ottawa ON K1A ON4 Ottawa ON K1A ON4 Canada Canada Your file Votre référence ISBN: 0-494-12675-2 Our file Notre référence ISBN: 0-494-12675-2 NOTICE: AVIS: The author has granted a non­ L'auteur a accordé une licence non exclusive exclusive license allowing Library permettant à la Bibliothèque et Archives and Archives Canada to reproduce, Canada de reproduire, publier, archiver, publish, archive, preserve, conserve, sauvegarder, conserver, transmettre au public communicate to the public by par télécommunication ou par l'Internet, prêter, telecommunication or on the Internet, distribuer et vendre des thèses partout dans loan, distribute and sell th es es le monde, à des fins commerciales ou autres, worldwide, for commercial or non­ sur support microforme, papier, électronique commercial purposes, in microform, et/ou autres formats. paper, electronic and/or any other formats. The author retains copyright L'auteur conserve la propriété du droit d'auteur ownership and moral rights in et des droits moraux qui protège cette thèse. this thesis. Neither the thesis Ni la thèse ni des extraits substantiels de nor substantial extracts from it celle-ci ne doivent être imprimés ou autrement may be printed or otherwise reproduits sans son autorisation. reproduced without the author's permission. ln compliance with the Canadian Conformément à la loi canadienne Privacy Act some supporting sur la protection de la vie privée, forms may have been removed quelques formulaires secondaires from this thesis. ont été enlevés de cette thèse. While these forms may be included Bien que ces formulaires in the document page count, aient inclus dans la pagination, their removal does not represent il n'y aura aucun contenu manquant. any loss of content from the thesis. ••• Canada ABSTRACT The safety of civil aviation has been endangered not only by terrorism, but also by many other unlawful acts committed by persons with varying motivation. The international community has worked to provide a secure and safe air transportation system for general people and thus has deve10ped aviation security systems in the legal and technical fields to combat and prevent the man-made intentional harm against civil aviation. The legal instruments are mainly based on several multilateral conventions, resolutions and dec1arations. They are aIl focused on how to eliminate safe heavens for unlawful actors against civil aviation, secure the safety of passenger and crew, and facilitate the resumption of affected aircraft. The technical instruments, dealing with specific preventive security measures to suppress the unlawful a cts against civil aviation 0 n a p ractical b asis, have b een d eveloped b y ICAO as "Standards and R ecommended P ractices" ( SARPs) in the f orm 0 f Annexes. In addition, t 0 promote global aviation security, ICAO launched its "Univers al Security Audit Programme" immediately following the tragic events of September Il, 2001. This thesis critically analyses the legal and technical aviation security systems under current international legal regimes and provides several recommendations to improve the remaining problems in the international aviation security system. Résumé La sûreté de l'aviation civile a été mise en péril, non seulement par le terrorisme, mais aussi par d'autres actes d'intervention illicites commis par des personnes ayant des motifs variés. La communauté internationale a travaillé afin d'assurer un système de transport aérien sécuritaire et sûr pour les voyageurs et a ainsi développé des systèmes de sûreté pour l'aviation dans les domaines légal et technique afin de combattre et de prévenir le dommage causé par l'humain contre l'aviation civile. Les instruments légaux sont basés principalement sur plusieurs conventions multilatérales, déclarations et résolutions. Ils se concentrent tous sur la façon d'éliminer les zones protégées pour les acteurs illicites contre l'aviation civile, d'assurer la sûreté du passager et de l'équipe et de faciliter la reprise d'aéronef affecté. Les instruments techniques de sûreté utilisés comme des mesures préventives spécifiques afin de réprimer les interventions illicites contre l'aviation civile sur une base pratique ont été développés par l'OACI sous le nom de «Normes et pratiques recommandées» (SARP) dans la forme d'Annexes. D'autant plus, afin de promouvoir la sûreté globale de l'aviation, l'OACI a établi le «Programme universel d'audits de sûreté» immédiatement après les évènements tragiques du Il septembre 2001. Cette thèse analyse de façon critique les systèmes de sûreté légal et technique d'aviation sous les régimes légaux internationaux actuels et fournit de nombreuses recommandations afin d'améliorer les problèmes restants dans le système de sûreté d'aviation internationale. ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENT First of aIl, l would like to use this opportunity to express my special thanks to my colleagues and supervisors in my office in Korea who inspired and supported me to study abroad for aviation security. Next, l should like to express my sincere appreciation and gratitude to my thesis supervisor, Professor Dr. Michael Milde for his sincere guidance and advice. In addition, l greatly benefited from his illustrious knowledge of international aviation law, moral rectitude and humanity in his lectures. Also, l must thank Mr. Chang, Man-Heui, a diplomat belonging to the representative office of Korea on the Council of ICAO, for pro vi ding me with ICAO Documents and valuable materials for my research, Mrs. Nancy Park, Ms. Helen Dragatsi and my c1assmate Mr. Yaw Otu Nyampong for their linguistic assistance while l wrote this thesis, and my lifelong friend Hwang, Jung-Ho for sparking me to see the world when he made a gift to me of a book about Law Schools in North America 12years ago. FinaIly, l would like to thank my wife Jang, Ji-Hyun for her quiet and sincere support ofmy studies at McGill University in Montreal and my two lovely children, Hyun-Seo and Hyun­ Sung for inspiring me do my best whenever l see them. l would like to dedicate this work to my family and friends. iii Table of Contents Page Abstract .................................................................................................. i Resume ................................................................................................... ii Acknowledgements .................................................................................... iii INTRODUCTION ................................................................................... 1 CHAPTER 1. Aviation Security System before the Tokyo Convention of 1963 .............. 3 1. The 1937 Geneva Convention for the Prevention and Punishment of Terrorism .......... 3 2. The D.N. Charter ..................................................................................... 5 3. The 1944 Chicago Convention on International Civil Aviation .............................. 6 4. The 1958 Geneva Convention on the High Seas .............................................................. 9 5. Conclusion ............................................................................................ Il CHAPTER II. Aviation Security System under Multilateral Conventions ................... 12 1. Background and Generalities............................................................................................. 12 2. The Tokyo Convention of 1963 ................................................................. 15 A. Scope of Application ............................................................................. 15 B. Jurisdiction .......................................................................................... 16 C. Powers of t he A ircraft Commander and 0 thers .......................................... 17 D. Powers and Duties of Contracting States .................................................... 18 E. Extradition ........................................................................................ 19 F. Conclusion ......................................................................................... 20 3. The Hague Convention of 1970 ................................................................. 21 A. Introduction ........................................................................................ 21 B. Scope of Application ............................................................................. 22 C. Jurisdiction ........................................................................................... 24 D. Powers and Duties of States ................................................................... 25 (a) Severity of the Penalty .......................................................................... 25 (b) M andatory Legal P roceedings ... ........................................................... 26 (c) Other Rights and Obligations ................................................................. 27 E. Extradition ........................................................................................... 28 F. Conclusion ..........................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • Aviation Law 2015 3Rd Edition
    ICLG The International Comparative Legal Guide to: Aviation Law 2015 3rd Edition A practical cross-border insight into aviation law Published by Global Legal Group, with contributions from: Alexander Holburn Beaudin + Lang LLP Locke Lord Edwards LLP Ali Budiardjo, Nugroho, Reksodiputro Maciel, Norman & Asociados Arnecke Siebold Rechtsanwälte Partnerschaftsgesellschaft McAfee & Taft Arte Law Firm MMMLegal - Legal Counsels Bahas, Gramatidis & Partners NDR – Neville de Rougemont & Associates Cabinet BOPS – SCP Bouckaert Ormen Passemard Ozturk & Partners Chacón & Rodríguez, S.C. Rojs, Peljhan, Prelesnik & Partners Christodoulou & Mavrikis Inc. Salazar & Asociados Condon & Forsyth LLP Studio Pierallini DDSA – De Luca, Derenusson, Schuttoff e Azevedo Taylor English Duma LLP Advogados Ventura Garcés & López-Ibor Abogados Dingli & Dingli Law Firm VISCHER AG Kaye Scholer LLP Worldwide Airports Lawyers Association (WALA) Kromann Reumert Kubes Passeyrer Attorneys at Law The International Comparative Legal Guide to: Aviation Law 2015 General Chapters: 1 The Use of Personal Data by the Commercial Aviation Industry – Alan Meneghetti, Locke Lord Edwards LLP 1 2 The Aviation Industry – Constant Change Leading to Tales of the Unexpected – Philip Perrotta, Contributing Editors Kaye Scholer LLP 4 Alan Meneghetti, Locke Lord Edwards LLP and Philip 3 Recent Developments in U.S. Aviation Law – 2015 – Unmanned Aircraft Systems Perrotta, Kaye Scholer LLP – Donald R. Andersen, Taylor English Duma LLP 8 Head of Business Development 4 The Cape Town Convention: An Evolving Process (with Side Notes on Selected Issues) Dror Levy – Erin M. Van Laanen & Maria E. Gonzalez, McAfee & Taft 11 Sales Director 5 The Need to Extend WALA’s Presence in the Airport Industry – Alan Meneghetti & Michael Siebold, Florjan Osmani Worldwide Airports Lawyers Association (WALA) 16 Commercial Director Antony Dine Account Directors Country Question and Answer Chapters: Oliver Smith, Rory Smith Senior Account Manager 6 Argentina Maciel, Norman & Asociados: Rogelio N.
    [Show full text]
  • Air India Flight 182
    Smith AAR AI 182 John Barry Smith www.corazon.com [email protected] Copyright 2001 All Rights Reserved AIRCRAFT ACCIDENT REPORT Air India Flight 182 1 Smith AAR AI 182 Report on the Accident to Boeing 747-237B VT-EFO, Air India Flight 182, Off Cork, Ireland on 23 June 1985 by John Barry Smith, Independent Aircraft Accident Investigator Abstract: Air India Flight 182, a Boeing 747-237B, registration VT-EFO, was on a flight from Mirabel airport, Montreal, Canada, to Heathrow airport, London, UK, when it disappeared from the radar scope at a position of latitude 51 degrees 0 minutes North and longitude 12 degrees 50 minutes West at 0714 Greenwich Mean Time (GMT), 23 June 1985, and the pieces crashed into the ocean about 110 miles west of Cork, Ireland. There were no survivors among the 329 passengers and crew members. There was unanimous official opinion among authorities that an inflight breakup caused by an explosion in the forward cargo compartment occurred. Based on the direct, tangible and circumstantial evidence of four similar accidents as described in six aircraft accident reports and using the benefit of hindsight, the conclusion of this investigator and author of this report is that the probable cause of the accident to Air India Flight 182 was faulty wiring shorting on the door unlatch motor causing the forward cargo door to inadvertently rupture open in flight probably at one or both of the midspan latches leading to an explosion of explosive decompression in the forward cargo compartment and subsequent aircraft breakup. Contents: 1. Air India Flight 182 Glossary Acronyms References and Source Materials Definitions Formatting Style Introduction 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Aviation Law Review
    Aviation Law Review Sixth Edition Editor Sean Gates lawreviews © 2018 Law Business Research Ltd Aviation law Review Sixth Edition Reproduced with permission from Law Business Research Ltd This article was first published in August 2018 For further information please contact [email protected] Editor Sean Gates lawreviews © 2018 Law Business Research Ltd PUBLISHER Tom Barnes SENIOR BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT MANAGER Nick Barette BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT MANAGERS Thomas Lee, Joel Woods SENIOR ACCOUNT MANAGER Pere Aspinall ACCOUNT MANAGERS Sophie Emberson, Jack Bagnall PRODUCT MARKETING EXECUTIVE Rebecca Mogridge RESEARCHER Keavy Hunnigal-Gaw EDITORIAL COORDINATOR Hannah Higgins HEAD OF PRODUCTION Adam Myers PRODUCTION EDITOR Tessa Brummitt SUBEDITOR Gina Mete CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER Paul Howarth Published in the United Kingdom by Law Business Research Ltd, London 87 Lancaster Road, London, W11 1QQ, UK © 2018 Law Business Research Ltd www.TheLawReviews.co.uk No photocopying: copyright licences do not apply. The information provided in this publication is general and may not apply in a specific situation, nor does it necessarily represent the views of authors’ firms or their clients. Legal advice should always be sought before taking any legal action based on the information provided. The publishers accept no responsibility for any acts or omissions contained herein. Although the information provided is accurate as of July 2018, be advised that this is a developing area. Enquiries concerning reproduction should be sent to Law Business
    [Show full text]
  • Canadian Airmen Lost in Wwii by Date 1943
    CANADA'S AIR WAR 1945 updated 21/04/08 January 1945 424 Sqn. and 433 Sqn. begin to re-equip with Lancaster B.I & B.III aircraft (RCAF Sqns.). 443 Sqn. begins to re-equip with Spitfire XIV and XIVe aircraft (RCAF Sqns.). Helicopter Training School established in England on Sikorsky Hoverfly I helicopters. One of these aircraft is transferred to the RCAF. An additional 16 PLUTO fuel pipelines are laid under the English Channel to points in France (Oxford). Japanese airstrip at Sandakan, Borneo, is put out of action by Allied bombing. Built with forced labour by some 3,600 Indonesian civilians and 2,400 Australian and British PoWs captured at Singapore (of which only some 1,900 were still alive at this time). It is decided to abandon the airfield. Between January and March the prisoners are force marched in groups to a new location 160 miles away, but most cannot complete the journey due to disease and malnutrition, and are killed by their guards. Only 6 Australian servicemen are found alive from this group at the end of the war, having escaped from the column, and only 3 of these survived to testify against their guards. All the remaining enlisted RAF prisoners of 205 Sqn., captured at Singapore and Indonesia, died in these death marches (Jardine, wikipedia). On the Russian front Soviet and Allied air forces (French, Czechoslovakian, Polish, etc, units flying under Soviet command) on their front with Germany total over 16,000 fighters, bombers, dive bombers and ground attack aircraft (Passingham & Klepacki). During January #2 Flying Instructor School, Pearce, Alberta, closes (http://www.bombercrew.com/BCATP.htm).
    [Show full text]
  • Recent Cases and Developments in Aviation Law Donald R
    Journal of Air Law and Commerce Volume 60 | Issue 1 Article 2 1994 Recent Cases and Developments in Aviation Law Donald R. Andersen Follow this and additional works at: https://scholar.smu.edu/jalc Recommended Citation Donald R. Andersen, Recent Cases and Developments in Aviation Law, 60 J. Air L. & Com. 3 (1994) https://scholar.smu.edu/jalc/vol60/iss1/2 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Journals at SMU Scholar. It has been accepted for inclusion in Journal of Air Law and Commerce by an authorized administrator of SMU Scholar. For more information, please visit http://digitalrepository.smu.edu. RECENT CASES AND DEVELOPMENTS IN AVIATION LAW DONALD R. ANDERSEN* TABLE OF CONTENTS I. JURISDICTION ................................ 5 A. SUBJECT-MATTER JURISDICTION .............. 5 B. FOREIGN SOVEREIGN IMMUNITIES ACT ....... 7 C. FORUM NON CONVENIENS ................... 8 D. FEDERAL REMOVAL .......................... 9 II. PREEM PTION ................................. 14 A. PRODUCTS LIABILITY ........................ 14 B. AIRLINE DEREGULATION ACT ................ 26 1. PersonalInjury or Wrongful Death Claims .................................. 26 2. Air CarrierBusiness Practice Claims ...... 34 3. Air CarrierEmployment Practice Claims ... 39 4. Implied Preemption of Air Carier Claims.. 43 III. WARSAW CONVENTION AND AIR CARRIER LIABILITY ..................................... 51 A. WARSAW JURISDICTION, PREEMPTION AND REMOVAL ................................... 51 B. PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE UNDER WARSAW CONVENTION ............................... 53 1. Notice of Liability Limitations ............ 53 * Partner, Drew, Eckl & Farnham, Atlanta, Georgia; B.E.S., Georgia Institute of Technology, with honors 1973;J.D., University of Georgia School of Law, cum laude, 1976, Order of the Coif, Articles Editor, Georgia Law Review 1975-76; member, The Florida Bar and State Bar of Georgia.
    [Show full text]
  • In-Flight Crimes, the Tokyo Convention, and Federal Judicial Jurisdiction, 35 J
    Journal of Air Law and Commerce Volume 35 | Issue 2 Article 2 1969 In-Flight Crimes, The okyT o Convention, and Federal Judicial Jurisdiction Jacob M. Denaro Follow this and additional works at: https://scholar.smu.edu/jalc Recommended Citation Jacob M. Denaro, In-Flight Crimes, The Tokyo Convention, and Federal Judicial Jurisdiction, 35 J. Air L. & Com. 171 (1969) https://scholar.smu.edu/jalc/vol35/iss2/2 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Journals at SMU Scholar. It has been accepted for inclusion in Journal of Air Law and Commerce by an authorized administrator of SMU Scholar. For more information, please visit http://digitalrepository.smu.edu. IN-FLIGHT CRIMES, THE TOKYO CONVENTION, AND FEDERAL JUDICIAL JURISDICTION By JACOB M. DENAROt I. INTRODUCTION A T TOKYO in 1963, a specialized agency of the United Nations 1 drafted a convention directed against offenses committed on board aircraft. The United States is signatory to that convention; but neither that sovereign nor a requisite number of States necessary to effectuate the document have as yet ratified the Tokyo Convention. Whether the Conven- tion should be ratified is a matter seriously being considered by the United States Government. The decision is dependent on two vital factors. First, it depends upon the ability of the Convention to respond to serious de- ficiencies presently existent in international criminal air law. Second, it depends upon the capacity of federal law to complement the Convention in areas which are intrinsically related to the subject matter of that docu- ment but which are, because of their inherently domestic nature, inappro- priate areas for a multilateral treaty.
    [Show full text]
  • Corporate Civil Airlines Criminal Responsibility Against Theft of Passengers Luggage in Terms of the Aspect of Criminal Law Indonesia
    Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, volume 192 1st International Conference on Indonesian Legal Studies (ICILS 2018) Corporate Civil Airlines Criminal Responsibility against Theft of Passengers Luggage in Terms of the Aspect of Criminal Law Indonesia Benny Sumardiana Aviation Law Expertise at Department of Criminal Law, Faculty of Law, Universitas Negeri Semarang (UNNES), Indonesia Email: [email protected] Abstract—Air transportation has a place in the hearts of the people, As a major transportation. Airline offers a lot of facilities that can be enjoyed passengers. The facilities are all about comfort in flight And its land crew service facilities. But, among the various strengths there is one community concerns that’s the theft was to passengers luggage, Loss of luggage or the contents of the luggage that missing. It is come to the attention of the public because so may cause adverse effect to airlines passengers. To this article will be discussed how the law aspect of airline responsibility over the phenomena.Corporate in this matter is an airline flight as the subject of a criminal act flight law make a different form of criminal responsibility with the individual criminal accountability. So, examined and discussed legal issues related to this is Reduction policy of criminal acts of flight in indonesia and Corporate civil airlines criminal responsibility Against theft passengers luggage In terms of the aspect of criminal law indonesiaWriting method of this legal research is a normative juridical research conducted by collecting primary, secondary and tertiary legal materials through literature study. The legal substance studied is Code No.
    [Show full text]
  • IE UN Gets Chinese Red Plaiil to Settle
    •.VA'VjWi >AGE SIXTEEN BIONDAY, MARCH 30, 1958 Average Daily Net Press Run iHanrl;eBtfr lEu^ning For tlw Week Ended The Weather M erck SS. 16.5S Pereeaat at 0. 8. Weniher B m aa Representatives of the eight fight it and stated that nation­ Manchester High school seniors focus attention on cancer at this A bout Town Mayor Slates wide collaboration to concentrate period, and ./ who visited the UN In New York on 10,933 Meetly rloudy tonight and March 10. unoei the sponsorship on cancer will be made during WHEREAS, the Americap'^Can- April. SPECIALIZING IN Member of the Audit TifckaU are - now on »ale from of the Rotary Club, together with cer .Society will conduct /its an- ^ IE Wedneeday. Rsfai likely Wednee-. Bureau «t CIrcnIatione Ui« foUowinc for the banquet of Lewis H. Piper, faculty advisor of Cancer Month The text of the proclamation nual crusade to enllghtcr( and ed-1 CUSTOM BUILT HOMES day night. Mbilmum tonight IS, the Mafllaneae Society to be held the Current Affairs Club, will be follows: ucate the public and false funds Manchester’—>A City of Village Charm during the month of April, , on May 17: pearl Street Barber guests of the Rotary Club tomor­ WHEREAS, the people of Man­ GENERAL CONTRACTING Shop, Wait Side Barber Shop. row night. Priscilla Torrance and Proclamation Anks Sup­ chester have demonstrated ad­ THEREFO RE, J, .Shei^'ood G. VOL. LXXII, NO. 153 (Clneelfled Advertlelng flh Page 14) Mw. Walter Iriah at 10 Depot Albert Guay will tell of the exper­ mirably in previous periods of Bowers,.
    [Show full text]
  • Aviation Law 2021
    Aviation Law 2021 A practical cross-border insight into aviation law Ninth Edition Featuring contributions from: ǼLEX Furtună și Asociații PRAT & CIA. Abogados AEROHELP Law Office Goemans, De Scheemaecker & De Wit RadcliffesLeBrasseur UK LLP Augusta Abogados Gross, Orad, Schlimoff & Co. (GOS) Raful Sicard Polanco & Fernández AZB & Partners IUNO SARANJIT SINGH, Advocates & Solicitors Bahar K&L Gates LLP SRPP Ltd. Benn-Ibler Rechtsanwaelte GmbH Kreindler & Kreindler LLP Studio Pierallini Canales, Dávila, De la Paz, Enríquez, Sáenz, Leal, S.C. Maples Group Urwantschky Dangel Borst PartmbB Clyde & Co Mori Hamada & Matsumoto VISCHER AG Fox Rothschild LLP Phoebus, Christos Clerides & Associates LLC Worldwide Airports Lawyers Association (WALA) Table of Contents Industry Chapter WALA: Bringing Together Airport Lawyers During the 1 Worst Shock to the Aviation Industry in History Elizabeth Albergoni, Worldwide Airports Lawyers Association (WALA) Expert Chapters (Still) Investing in Mid-Life Aviation Assets 4 Philip Perrotta, K&L Gates LLP The Use of Personal Data in the Commercial Aviation Industry 10 Alan D. Meneghetti, RadcliffesLeBrasseur UK LLP Examining Airline Woes and Passenger Rights 16 in the 2020–2021 Environment Marc S. Moller & Justin T. Green, Kreindler & Kreindler LLP Regulations on Drone Flights in Japan 22 Hiromi Hayashi & Koji Toshima, Mori Hamada & Matsumoto Q&A Chapters Austria India 27 Benn-Ibler Rechtsanwaelte GmbH: 111 AZB & Partners: Anand Shah & Rishiraj Baruah Mag. Irena Gogl-Hassanin, LL.M. Indonesia Belgium 122 Bahar: Wahyuni Bahar, Fairuz Rista Ismah & 33 Goemans, De Scheemaecker & De Wit: Putu Surya Resa Birgitta Van Itterbeek & Annick Sleeckx Ireland British Virgin Islands 130 Maples Group: Donna Ager, Mary O’Neill & 44 Maples Group: Michael Gagie, Rebecca Lee & Mary Dunne James Kinsley Israel Cayman Islands 143 Gross, Orad, Schlimoff & Co.
    [Show full text]
  • What Is International Aviation Law?
    Cambridge University Press 978-1-107-02052-8 - The Principles and Practice of International Aviation Law Brian F. Havel and Gabriel S. Sanchez Excerpt More information 1 What Is International Aviation Law? 1.1. introduction: a book about international aviation law 1.1.1. Introducing Aviation Law in Its International Dimension In his landmark casebook-treatise Aviation Law, Professor Andreas Lowenfeld set out to answer the challenge of his friend, Judge Henry Friendly, that there would only be value in giving the rules and regulations governing air transport separate treatment if “the heads of [the] given subject can be examined in a more illuminating fashion with reference to each other than with reference to 1 other branches of law.” Despite Judge Friendly’s negative appraisal of the possibility, Lowenfeld prevailed. Aviation Law – expanded considerably with the publication of its second edition in 1981 – provided an integrated overview and analysis of the broad, and occasionally disparate, “heads” (e.g., economic, safety, and tort) of U.S. aviation law to a generation of students, practitioners, and academics before tumbling into obsolescence as its author abandoned 2 further updates in favor of new research agendas. As the size and format of the book you currently hold in your hands (or have downloaded to your eReader) 3 make apparent, The Principles and Practice of International Aviation Law 1 Andreas F. Lowenfeld, Aviation Law: Cases and Materials xiii (1972) (internal quotation marks omitted). 2 See, e.g., Andreas F. Lowenfeld, International Economic Law (2d ed. 2008); Andreas F. Lowenfeld, International Litigation and Arbitration (3d ed.
    [Show full text]
  • Florida Aviation and Space Law Update Florida Aviation Law Journal
    A Publication of The Florida Bar Aviation Law Committee To Promote Education in the Florida Aviation Community Volume 2, Issue 3 Florida Aviation Law Journal November 2012 Florida Aviation and Space Law Update Timothy M. Ravich* In 2012, I launched the “Florida Aviation landing, a passenger on a commercial flight and Space Law Report” (“FASLR”), a detailed from Phoenix, Arizona, to Fort Lauderdale, review of important aviation related decisions Florida, allegedly stole $500 from a fel- reported in Florida, including by federal dis- low passenger’s purse. A flight attendant trict courts and the Eleventh Circuit Court intervened and compelled the return of IN THIS ISSUE of Appeals. The the money. The In Case You Missed It ................4 FASLR also pres- airplane was not ents new or pro- in Florida’s terri- Airline Window Shade Wars ......5 posed rules, reg- tory at any point It Happens Like Clockwork ........6 ulations, and leg- when the theft Crime Or Punishment - Your islation impactful or recovery of Choice, Your Wallet ...............7 of the practices the money took IRS Chief Counsel Advice of aviation law- place, but when Could Result in IRS Auditors yers in Florida. the airplane Applying Federal Excise Published twice landed, the Bro- Tax to Part 91 Management yearly (May and ward County Arrangements ........................8 November), the Sheriff’s Office In Memoriam ............................14 FASLR focuses effected an ar- on six areas of rest and the crim- aviation law: (1) inal defendant Source: Photo By: Gerald L. Maatman, Jr. and Laura Maechtlen airports and land was charged and use; (2) corporate and general aviation; (3) convicted of grand theft in excess of $300.
    [Show full text]
  • Employment & Labour Law 2019
    ICLG The International Comparative Legal Guide to: Employment & Labour Law 2019 9th Edition A practical cross-border insight into employment and labour law Published by Global Legal Group, with contributions from: A. Lopes Muniz Advogados Associados Filion Wakely Thorup Angeletti LLP MJM Limited ACG International GANADO Advocates Monereo Meyer Abogados Al Hashmi Law GERLACH Rechtsanwälte Mori Hamada & Matsumoto Amit, Pollak, Matalon & Co. Hamdan AlShamsi Lawyers and ONV LAW AnJie Law Firm Legal Consultants People + Culture Strategies BAS - Sociedade de Advogados, SP, RL Hassan Radhi & Associates Porzio Ríos García Carnelutti Law Firm Hogan Lovells R&T Asia (Thailand) Limited CDZ Legal Advisors Homburger Rátkai Law Firm Cheadle Thompson & Haysom Inc. Attorneys Hughes Hubbard & Reed LLP SANDIVA Legal Network Debarliev, Dameski & Kelesoska, Koushos Korfiotis Papacharalambous LLC Seow & Associates Attorneys at Law Lakshmikumaran & Sridharan SEUM Law Deloitte Kosova Sh.p.k. Latournerie Wolfrom Avocats Udo Udoma & Belo-Osagie Deloitte Legal Sh.p.k. Law firm Šafar & Partners, Ltd Waselius & Wist DQ Advocates Limited Lewis Silkin Winkler Partners Egorov Puginsky Afanasiev & Partners Lund Elmer Sandager Law Firm LLP EmpLaw Advokater AB Lydian Esenyel|Partners Lawyers & Consultants McCann FitzGerald Etude Jackye Elombo Meridian Law Chambers The International Comparative Legal Guide to: Employment & Labour Law 2019 Country Question and Answer Chapters: 1 Albania Deloitte Legal Sh.p.k.: Sabina Lalaj & Ened Topi 1 2 Australia People + Culture Strategies: Joydeep Hor & Therese MacDermott 11 3 Austria GERLACH Rechtsanwälte: Roland Gerlach & Markus Loescher 18 Contributing Editors 4 Bahamas Meridian Law Chambers: Dywan A. G. R. Rodgers 24 Stefan Martin & Jo Broadbent, Hogan Lovells 5 Bahrain Hassan Radhi & Associates: Ahmed Abbas & Sayed Jaffer Mohammed 30 Sales Director 6 Belgium Lydian: Jan Hofkens & Alexander Vandenbergen 37 Florjan Osmani 7 Bermuda MJM Limited: Fozeia Rana-Fahy 44 Account Director Oliver Smith 8 Brazil A.
    [Show full text]