Florida Aviation and Space Law Update Florida Aviation Law Journal

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Florida Aviation and Space Law Update Florida Aviation Law Journal A Publication of The Florida Bar Aviation Law Committee To Promote Education in the Florida Aviation Community Volume 2, Issue 3 Florida Aviation Law Journal November 2012 Florida Aviation and Space Law Update Timothy M. Ravich* In 2012, I launched the “Florida Aviation landing, a passenger on a commercial flight and Space Law Report” (“FASLR”), a detailed from Phoenix, Arizona, to Fort Lauderdale, review of important aviation related decisions Florida, allegedly stole $500 from a fel- reported in Florida, including by federal dis- low passenger’s purse. A flight attendant trict courts and the Eleventh Circuit Court intervened and compelled the return of IN THIS ISSUE of Appeals. The the money. The In Case You Missed It ................4 FASLR also pres- airplane was not ents new or pro- in Florida’s terri- Airline Window Shade Wars ......5 posed rules, reg- tory at any point It Happens Like Clockwork ........6 ulations, and leg- when the theft Crime Or Punishment - Your islation impactful or recovery of Choice, Your Wallet ...............7 of the practices the money took IRS Chief Counsel Advice of aviation law- place, but when Could Result in IRS Auditors yers in Florida. the airplane Applying Federal Excise Published twice landed, the Bro- Tax to Part 91 Management yearly (May and ward County Arrangements ........................8 November), the Sheriff’s Office In Memoriam ............................14 FASLR focuses effected an ar- on six areas of rest and the crim- aviation law: (1) inal defendant Source: Photo By: Gerald L. Maatman, Jr. and Laura Maechtlen airports and land was charged and use; (2) corporate and general aviation; (3) convicted of grand theft in excess of $300. labor and employment; (4) litigation; (5) The conviction was overturned under regulatory law; and (6) space law. In doing Fla. Stat. § 910.005 (2008) on the basis Editorial Board: so, the FASLR both reflects how dynamic the that Florida did not have jurisdiction be- cause all of the elements of the theft oc- S. V. (Steve) Dedmon practice of aviation law is in our jurisdiction curred before the airplane reached Florida. Editor-in-Chief and serves as a resource for aviation and aerospace practitioners in Florida. The state’s criminal jurisdiction statute Below are excerpts from the November “is unique in that it encompasses both Committee Officers: issue of the FASLR in what will be a regular the completed offense and the attempt Charles R. Morgenstein aviation and space law update in upcoming as the same offense.” The passenger at Chair Vectors publications. I hope this resource issue neither committed a theft “wholly or partly within” Florida nor did her action Frank Bradley Harris will be not only personally informative, but “constitute an attempt to commit an offense Vice Chair also professionally practical as you encoun- ter aviation related issues in your practice. within Florida.” Consequently, the convic- Robert Patrick Phillips I. Airports and Land Use tion should have been dismissed and was Vice Chair Sanders v. State, 77 So. 3d 914 (Fla. 4th reversed by Florida’s Fourth District Court Walter G. Campbell, Jr. DCA 2012) of Appeal. Board Liaison Approximately forty-five minutes prior to See “Space Law Update” page 11 “Read Back” By S.V. (Steve) Dedmon Since our last issue of Vectors there was our Septem- by the committee four years ago and since its inception ber meeting, a January aviation certification examination has been awarded to a deserving Embry-Riddle Aeronau- course review, our annual June meeting and another tical University student. The picture commemorating the September meeting. As you can see, either the commit- event and details are included herein on page 4. After the tee is very busy or the Vectors publication needs to be introductions, we began to launch the presentations by published more often; and the answer to that is BOTH! our most capable crew. So, this becomes a year in review edition. First off the deck was Pat Phillips discussing the FAA At the September 2011 installment Jack Haun, Director and their responsibility or lack thereof in regulating towers of Maintenance at Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University affecting aviation. The presentation was quite comprehen- in Daytona Beach, spoke to the members regarding Six sive as it included constitutional preemption issues and ap- Things Pilots Should Know and Where to Find Them plicable cases as well as the FAA’s statutory responsibility in the Aircraft Logbooks. Harry Lee Cole IV then hosted under the FAA Act of 1958 and various CFRs. Additionally, a spirited discussing revolving around the case of U.S. the FCC’s responsibility was discussed as well as zoning Aviation Underwriters vs. Pilatus Business Aircraft issues, which related back to preemption. There was also Ltd. Following him was Jerry Trachtman. His topic, Aus- discussion pertaining to lighting and FAA guidelines. tralian Courts Breathe Life into Toxic Cabin Air Litiga- Second, in what is now becoming SOP, Don Anderson tion brought the members up-to-date on current/pending presented current developments in aviation. Cases relating litigation affecting passengers traveling on commercial air to general and personal jurisdiction and their influence on carriers. Following Jerry was Don Anderson and Recent aviation were emphasized. The most telling was challeng- Developments in Aviation, and finally Hunter Chamberlin ing the traditional law school concept of a product being in discussing Mechanics Liens and Non Judicial Sales: the “stream of commerce” to establish personal jurisdiction Taking What’s Not Yours…Yet. As you can see, the top- over a manufacturer. The court has now concluded there ics and subject matter are well worth the Continuing Legal should be a “stream of commerce plus” test, thus raising Education hours. the traditional standard. Preemption was discussed as The certification review for board certification in avia- well as it related to field preemption of federal verses state tion law was done after the conclusion of the Aviation Law law. Forum non-conveins and diversity issues were also and Insurance Symposium at its January meeting. The discussed. presenters including Don Maciejewski, Ed (Skip) Booth, Although he was unable to attend in person, Mohammad Norris Richey, Jeff Ludwig, Ed Curtis, Pat Phillips, Stuart Ahmed Faruqui was able to present via teleconferencing. Goldstein and Jerry Trachtman voluntarily give their time Tim Ravich had advised the membership prior to the meet- to assist their colleagues sitting for the examination. The ing this was a viable alternative to physically being there, topics are taken from the bibliography supplied by the Bar which is a great way to participate and get way to get credit and the topics include litigation, enforcement, international for participating via technology. Mohammad presented a law, airport land use, labor relations, air taxi operations, typical commercial aviation scenario and analyzed it in the aircraft registration, and space law. Even if someone is context of a party filing bankruptcy under Chapter 7 or 11. not sitting for the examination, it is a thorough review of Required financial forms were discussed as well as means aviation law and well worth one’s time. for a creditor to protect its assets when in possession of As the air boss told Maverick in Top Gun when he others. requested a flyby, “Ghost Rider, the pattern is full,” best To get everyone back to terra firma there were a flurry of described the Aviation Law Bar Committee’s June 2012 “carrier traps.” Robert Feldman discussed board certifica- meeting in conjunction with the Bar’s annual meeting in tion and membership in the Lawyer-Pilots Bar Association. Orlando. Although the airspace was congested, those in Christopher Jahr presented whether the committee wanted the pattern were the consummate professionals. to consider creating Bar approved aviation CLEs and the Chair, Tim Ravich began by welcoming everyone fol- whats and wherefores that would entail. Tim then passed lowed by the members introducing themselves, where out information about his Florida Aviation and Space Law they were from and their areas of practice. As part of Report initiative. the introductions I was able to update the committee on Finally, there was a change in command as Tim was Jerome Williams, the 2012-2013 recipient of the Eilon honored for his leadership as he passed the responsibility Krugman-Kadi scholarship. The scholarship was endowed Continued on next page 2 Spa in Jacksonville. surrounding intent to defraud, respon- “Read Back” The first presenter was Barbara sibility, and culpability of mechanics Continued from previous page Duffy of RotorWorld LLC in Orlando. actions related to the repair of aircraft. She began with a simulated emer- The opinions were varied depending to incoming chair Charlie Morgenstein gency in the meeting room as a means on one’s propensity to allege wrong- and co-chairs Brad Hassell and Pat to focus the group on the precious doing or defend it. The final emphasis Phillips. Charlie challenged us to be a seconds related to emergency actions was, if criminalizing the actions of me- part of Eilon’s legacy by contributing and gave an overview of the simulation chanics is here, what will be the result to the aforementioned scholarship, itself and everyone’s reactions to the on industry as mechanics rethink their reminded us of the Bar’s agenda, and given instructions. She then moved on responsibilities and career choice in asked for suggestions for speakers as to using an actual crash case as the light of potential criminal prosecution. well as possible additional committee backdrop for her presentation which The last presenter was Jason Lo- activities. He then officially made his involved a group of aircraft flying in renzon who is the principle of Lorenzon first command decision and adjourned formation resulting in one of them Immigration Law based in Indepen- the meeting.
Recommended publications
  • Aviation Law 2015 3Rd Edition
    ICLG The International Comparative Legal Guide to: Aviation Law 2015 3rd Edition A practical cross-border insight into aviation law Published by Global Legal Group, with contributions from: Alexander Holburn Beaudin + Lang LLP Locke Lord Edwards LLP Ali Budiardjo, Nugroho, Reksodiputro Maciel, Norman & Asociados Arnecke Siebold Rechtsanwälte Partnerschaftsgesellschaft McAfee & Taft Arte Law Firm MMMLegal - Legal Counsels Bahas, Gramatidis & Partners NDR – Neville de Rougemont & Associates Cabinet BOPS – SCP Bouckaert Ormen Passemard Ozturk & Partners Chacón & Rodríguez, S.C. Rojs, Peljhan, Prelesnik & Partners Christodoulou & Mavrikis Inc. Salazar & Asociados Condon & Forsyth LLP Studio Pierallini DDSA – De Luca, Derenusson, Schuttoff e Azevedo Taylor English Duma LLP Advogados Ventura Garcés & López-Ibor Abogados Dingli & Dingli Law Firm VISCHER AG Kaye Scholer LLP Worldwide Airports Lawyers Association (WALA) Kromann Reumert Kubes Passeyrer Attorneys at Law The International Comparative Legal Guide to: Aviation Law 2015 General Chapters: 1 The Use of Personal Data by the Commercial Aviation Industry – Alan Meneghetti, Locke Lord Edwards LLP 1 2 The Aviation Industry – Constant Change Leading to Tales of the Unexpected – Philip Perrotta, Contributing Editors Kaye Scholer LLP 4 Alan Meneghetti, Locke Lord Edwards LLP and Philip 3 Recent Developments in U.S. Aviation Law – 2015 – Unmanned Aircraft Systems Perrotta, Kaye Scholer LLP – Donald R. Andersen, Taylor English Duma LLP 8 Head of Business Development 4 The Cape Town Convention: An Evolving Process (with Side Notes on Selected Issues) Dror Levy – Erin M. Van Laanen & Maria E. Gonzalez, McAfee & Taft 11 Sales Director 5 The Need to Extend WALA’s Presence in the Airport Industry – Alan Meneghetti & Michael Siebold, Florjan Osmani Worldwide Airports Lawyers Association (WALA) 16 Commercial Director Antony Dine Account Directors Country Question and Answer Chapters: Oliver Smith, Rory Smith Senior Account Manager 6 Argentina Maciel, Norman & Asociados: Rogelio N.
    [Show full text]
  • Aviation Law Review
    Aviation Law Review Sixth Edition Editor Sean Gates lawreviews © 2018 Law Business Research Ltd Aviation law Review Sixth Edition Reproduced with permission from Law Business Research Ltd This article was first published in August 2018 For further information please contact [email protected] Editor Sean Gates lawreviews © 2018 Law Business Research Ltd PUBLISHER Tom Barnes SENIOR BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT MANAGER Nick Barette BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT MANAGERS Thomas Lee, Joel Woods SENIOR ACCOUNT MANAGER Pere Aspinall ACCOUNT MANAGERS Sophie Emberson, Jack Bagnall PRODUCT MARKETING EXECUTIVE Rebecca Mogridge RESEARCHER Keavy Hunnigal-Gaw EDITORIAL COORDINATOR Hannah Higgins HEAD OF PRODUCTION Adam Myers PRODUCTION EDITOR Tessa Brummitt SUBEDITOR Gina Mete CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER Paul Howarth Published in the United Kingdom by Law Business Research Ltd, London 87 Lancaster Road, London, W11 1QQ, UK © 2018 Law Business Research Ltd www.TheLawReviews.co.uk No photocopying: copyright licences do not apply. The information provided in this publication is general and may not apply in a specific situation, nor does it necessarily represent the views of authors’ firms or their clients. Legal advice should always be sought before taking any legal action based on the information provided. The publishers accept no responsibility for any acts or omissions contained herein. Although the information provided is accurate as of July 2018, be advised that this is a developing area. Enquiries concerning reproduction should be sent to Law Business
    [Show full text]
  • Recent Cases and Developments in Aviation Law Donald R
    Journal of Air Law and Commerce Volume 60 | Issue 1 Article 2 1994 Recent Cases and Developments in Aviation Law Donald R. Andersen Follow this and additional works at: https://scholar.smu.edu/jalc Recommended Citation Donald R. Andersen, Recent Cases and Developments in Aviation Law, 60 J. Air L. & Com. 3 (1994) https://scholar.smu.edu/jalc/vol60/iss1/2 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Journals at SMU Scholar. It has been accepted for inclusion in Journal of Air Law and Commerce by an authorized administrator of SMU Scholar. For more information, please visit http://digitalrepository.smu.edu. RECENT CASES AND DEVELOPMENTS IN AVIATION LAW DONALD R. ANDERSEN* TABLE OF CONTENTS I. JURISDICTION ................................ 5 A. SUBJECT-MATTER JURISDICTION .............. 5 B. FOREIGN SOVEREIGN IMMUNITIES ACT ....... 7 C. FORUM NON CONVENIENS ................... 8 D. FEDERAL REMOVAL .......................... 9 II. PREEM PTION ................................. 14 A. PRODUCTS LIABILITY ........................ 14 B. AIRLINE DEREGULATION ACT ................ 26 1. PersonalInjury or Wrongful Death Claims .................................. 26 2. Air CarrierBusiness Practice Claims ...... 34 3. Air CarrierEmployment Practice Claims ... 39 4. Implied Preemption of Air Carier Claims.. 43 III. WARSAW CONVENTION AND AIR CARRIER LIABILITY ..................................... 51 A. WARSAW JURISDICTION, PREEMPTION AND REMOVAL ................................... 51 B. PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE UNDER WARSAW CONVENTION ............................... 53 1. Notice of Liability Limitations ............ 53 * Partner, Drew, Eckl & Farnham, Atlanta, Georgia; B.E.S., Georgia Institute of Technology, with honors 1973;J.D., University of Georgia School of Law, cum laude, 1976, Order of the Coif, Articles Editor, Georgia Law Review 1975-76; member, The Florida Bar and State Bar of Georgia.
    [Show full text]
  • In-Flight Crimes, the Tokyo Convention, and Federal Judicial Jurisdiction, 35 J
    Journal of Air Law and Commerce Volume 35 | Issue 2 Article 2 1969 In-Flight Crimes, The okyT o Convention, and Federal Judicial Jurisdiction Jacob M. Denaro Follow this and additional works at: https://scholar.smu.edu/jalc Recommended Citation Jacob M. Denaro, In-Flight Crimes, The Tokyo Convention, and Federal Judicial Jurisdiction, 35 J. Air L. & Com. 171 (1969) https://scholar.smu.edu/jalc/vol35/iss2/2 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Journals at SMU Scholar. It has been accepted for inclusion in Journal of Air Law and Commerce by an authorized administrator of SMU Scholar. For more information, please visit http://digitalrepository.smu.edu. IN-FLIGHT CRIMES, THE TOKYO CONVENTION, AND FEDERAL JUDICIAL JURISDICTION By JACOB M. DENAROt I. INTRODUCTION A T TOKYO in 1963, a specialized agency of the United Nations 1 drafted a convention directed against offenses committed on board aircraft. The United States is signatory to that convention; but neither that sovereign nor a requisite number of States necessary to effectuate the document have as yet ratified the Tokyo Convention. Whether the Conven- tion should be ratified is a matter seriously being considered by the United States Government. The decision is dependent on two vital factors. First, it depends upon the ability of the Convention to respond to serious de- ficiencies presently existent in international criminal air law. Second, it depends upon the capacity of federal law to complement the Convention in areas which are intrinsically related to the subject matter of that docu- ment but which are, because of their inherently domestic nature, inappro- priate areas for a multilateral treaty.
    [Show full text]
  • Corporate Civil Airlines Criminal Responsibility Against Theft of Passengers Luggage in Terms of the Aspect of Criminal Law Indonesia
    Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, volume 192 1st International Conference on Indonesian Legal Studies (ICILS 2018) Corporate Civil Airlines Criminal Responsibility against Theft of Passengers Luggage in Terms of the Aspect of Criminal Law Indonesia Benny Sumardiana Aviation Law Expertise at Department of Criminal Law, Faculty of Law, Universitas Negeri Semarang (UNNES), Indonesia Email: [email protected] Abstract—Air transportation has a place in the hearts of the people, As a major transportation. Airline offers a lot of facilities that can be enjoyed passengers. The facilities are all about comfort in flight And its land crew service facilities. But, among the various strengths there is one community concerns that’s the theft was to passengers luggage, Loss of luggage or the contents of the luggage that missing. It is come to the attention of the public because so may cause adverse effect to airlines passengers. To this article will be discussed how the law aspect of airline responsibility over the phenomena.Corporate in this matter is an airline flight as the subject of a criminal act flight law make a different form of criminal responsibility with the individual criminal accountability. So, examined and discussed legal issues related to this is Reduction policy of criminal acts of flight in indonesia and Corporate civil airlines criminal responsibility Against theft passengers luggage In terms of the aspect of criminal law indonesiaWriting method of this legal research is a normative juridical research conducted by collecting primary, secondary and tertiary legal materials through literature study. The legal substance studied is Code No.
    [Show full text]
  • Aviation Law 2021
    Aviation Law 2021 A practical cross-border insight into aviation law Ninth Edition Featuring contributions from: ǼLEX Furtună și Asociații PRAT & CIA. Abogados AEROHELP Law Office Goemans, De Scheemaecker & De Wit RadcliffesLeBrasseur UK LLP Augusta Abogados Gross, Orad, Schlimoff & Co. (GOS) Raful Sicard Polanco & Fernández AZB & Partners IUNO SARANJIT SINGH, Advocates & Solicitors Bahar K&L Gates LLP SRPP Ltd. Benn-Ibler Rechtsanwaelte GmbH Kreindler & Kreindler LLP Studio Pierallini Canales, Dávila, De la Paz, Enríquez, Sáenz, Leal, S.C. Maples Group Urwantschky Dangel Borst PartmbB Clyde & Co Mori Hamada & Matsumoto VISCHER AG Fox Rothschild LLP Phoebus, Christos Clerides & Associates LLC Worldwide Airports Lawyers Association (WALA) Table of Contents Industry Chapter WALA: Bringing Together Airport Lawyers During the 1 Worst Shock to the Aviation Industry in History Elizabeth Albergoni, Worldwide Airports Lawyers Association (WALA) Expert Chapters (Still) Investing in Mid-Life Aviation Assets 4 Philip Perrotta, K&L Gates LLP The Use of Personal Data in the Commercial Aviation Industry 10 Alan D. Meneghetti, RadcliffesLeBrasseur UK LLP Examining Airline Woes and Passenger Rights 16 in the 2020–2021 Environment Marc S. Moller & Justin T. Green, Kreindler & Kreindler LLP Regulations on Drone Flights in Japan 22 Hiromi Hayashi & Koji Toshima, Mori Hamada & Matsumoto Q&A Chapters Austria India 27 Benn-Ibler Rechtsanwaelte GmbH: 111 AZB & Partners: Anand Shah & Rishiraj Baruah Mag. Irena Gogl-Hassanin, LL.M. Indonesia Belgium 122 Bahar: Wahyuni Bahar, Fairuz Rista Ismah & 33 Goemans, De Scheemaecker & De Wit: Putu Surya Resa Birgitta Van Itterbeek & Annick Sleeckx Ireland British Virgin Islands 130 Maples Group: Donna Ager, Mary O’Neill & 44 Maples Group: Michael Gagie, Rebecca Lee & Mary Dunne James Kinsley Israel Cayman Islands 143 Gross, Orad, Schlimoff & Co.
    [Show full text]
  • What Is International Aviation Law?
    Cambridge University Press 978-1-107-02052-8 - The Principles and Practice of International Aviation Law Brian F. Havel and Gabriel S. Sanchez Excerpt More information 1 What Is International Aviation Law? 1.1. introduction: a book about international aviation law 1.1.1. Introducing Aviation Law in Its International Dimension In his landmark casebook-treatise Aviation Law, Professor Andreas Lowenfeld set out to answer the challenge of his friend, Judge Henry Friendly, that there would only be value in giving the rules and regulations governing air transport separate treatment if “the heads of [the] given subject can be examined in a more illuminating fashion with reference to each other than with reference to 1 other branches of law.” Despite Judge Friendly’s negative appraisal of the possibility, Lowenfeld prevailed. Aviation Law – expanded considerably with the publication of its second edition in 1981 – provided an integrated overview and analysis of the broad, and occasionally disparate, “heads” (e.g., economic, safety, and tort) of U.S. aviation law to a generation of students, practitioners, and academics before tumbling into obsolescence as its author abandoned 2 further updates in favor of new research agendas. As the size and format of the book you currently hold in your hands (or have downloaded to your eReader) 3 make apparent, The Principles and Practice of International Aviation Law 1 Andreas F. Lowenfeld, Aviation Law: Cases and Materials xiii (1972) (internal quotation marks omitted). 2 See, e.g., Andreas F. Lowenfeld, International Economic Law (2d ed. 2008); Andreas F. Lowenfeld, International Litigation and Arbitration (3d ed.
    [Show full text]
  • Employment & Labour Law 2019
    ICLG The International Comparative Legal Guide to: Employment & Labour Law 2019 9th Edition A practical cross-border insight into employment and labour law Published by Global Legal Group, with contributions from: A. Lopes Muniz Advogados Associados Filion Wakely Thorup Angeletti LLP MJM Limited ACG International GANADO Advocates Monereo Meyer Abogados Al Hashmi Law GERLACH Rechtsanwälte Mori Hamada & Matsumoto Amit, Pollak, Matalon & Co. Hamdan AlShamsi Lawyers and ONV LAW AnJie Law Firm Legal Consultants People + Culture Strategies BAS - Sociedade de Advogados, SP, RL Hassan Radhi & Associates Porzio Ríos García Carnelutti Law Firm Hogan Lovells R&T Asia (Thailand) Limited CDZ Legal Advisors Homburger Rátkai Law Firm Cheadle Thompson & Haysom Inc. Attorneys Hughes Hubbard & Reed LLP SANDIVA Legal Network Debarliev, Dameski & Kelesoska, Koushos Korfiotis Papacharalambous LLC Seow & Associates Attorneys at Law Lakshmikumaran & Sridharan SEUM Law Deloitte Kosova Sh.p.k. Latournerie Wolfrom Avocats Udo Udoma & Belo-Osagie Deloitte Legal Sh.p.k. Law firm Šafar & Partners, Ltd Waselius & Wist DQ Advocates Limited Lewis Silkin Winkler Partners Egorov Puginsky Afanasiev & Partners Lund Elmer Sandager Law Firm LLP EmpLaw Advokater AB Lydian Esenyel|Partners Lawyers & Consultants McCann FitzGerald Etude Jackye Elombo Meridian Law Chambers The International Comparative Legal Guide to: Employment & Labour Law 2019 Country Question and Answer Chapters: 1 Albania Deloitte Legal Sh.p.k.: Sabina Lalaj & Ened Topi 1 2 Australia People + Culture Strategies: Joydeep Hor & Therese MacDermott 11 3 Austria GERLACH Rechtsanwälte: Roland Gerlach & Markus Loescher 18 Contributing Editors 4 Bahamas Meridian Law Chambers: Dywan A. G. R. Rodgers 24 Stefan Martin & Jo Broadbent, Hogan Lovells 5 Bahrain Hassan Radhi & Associates: Ahmed Abbas & Sayed Jaffer Mohammed 30 Sales Director 6 Belgium Lydian: Jan Hofkens & Alexander Vandenbergen 37 Florjan Osmani 7 Bermuda MJM Limited: Fozeia Rana-Fahy 44 Account Director Oliver Smith 8 Brazil A.
    [Show full text]
  • Ad Coelum Maxim As Applied to Aviation Law Lora D
    Notre Dame Law Review Volume 21 | Issue 3 Article 1 3-1-1946 Ad Coelum Maxim As Applied to Aviation Law Lora D. Lashbrook Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarship.law.nd.edu/ndlr Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Lora D. Lashbrook, Ad Coelum Maxim As Applied to Aviation Law, 21 Notre Dame L. Rev. 143 (1946). Available at: http://scholarship.law.nd.edu/ndlr/vol21/iss3/1 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by NDLScholarship. It has been accepted for inclusion in Notre Dame Law Review by an authorized administrator of NDLScholarship. For more information, please contact [email protected]. NOTRE DAME LAWYER A Quarterly Law Review VOL. XXI MARCH, 1946 NO. 3 THE "AD COELUM" MAXIM AS APPLIED TO AVIATION LAW T IIE rapid development of the use of the air as a medium of commercial transportation has raised the question of the application of the ancient maxim "Cujus est solum eius est usque ad coelum et ad inferas" which means "He who owns the soil owns everything above and below, from heaven to hell."' The maxim had its origin in England and fol- lowed the body of common law from that country into the jurisprudence of the United States. In order to understand why the maxim is important we must trace it to its origin and then follow it back down through the courts as it has been applied to specific cases. Although the courts have never hesitated to deny its application -to cases involving aviation, it is still being offered as a plea when property owners believe they are being damaged by the operation of aircraft over their property or by the proximity of airports to their homes.
    [Show full text]
  • The Duty to Warn in Aviation Law: a New Tort Theory in the Aftermath of Pan American Flight 103
    NYLS Journal of Human Rights Volume 8 Issue 1 VOLUME VIII Fall 1990 Part One Article 7 1990 The Duty to Warn in Aviation Law: A New Tort Theory in the Aftermath of Pan American Flight 103 Cynthia Dokas Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.nyls.edu/journal_of_human_rights Part of the Air and Space Law Commons, Constitutional Law Commons, National Security Law Commons, and the Torts Commons Recommended Citation Dokas, Cynthia (1990) "The Duty to Warn in Aviation Law: A New Tort Theory in the Aftermath of Pan American Flight 103," NYLS Journal of Human Rights: Vol. 8 : Iss. 1 , Article 7. Available at: https://digitalcommons.nyls.edu/journal_of_human_rights/vol8/iss1/7 This Notes and Comments is brought to you for free and open access by DigitalCommons@NYLS. It has been accepted for inclusion in NYLS Journal of Human Rights by an authorized editor of DigitalCommons@NYLS. THE DUTY TO WARN IN AVIATION LAW: A NEW TORT THEORY IN THE AFTERMATH OF PAN AMERICAN FLIGHT 103" I. INTRODUCTION I wish my life and decisions to depend on myself, not on external forces of whatever kind. I wish to be the instrument of my own, not of other men's, acts of will. I wish to be a subject, not an object; to be moved by reasons, by conscious purposes which are my own, not by causes which affect me, as it were, from outside. I wish, above all, to be conscious of myself as a thinking, willing, active being, bearing responsibility for his choices and able to explain them by reference to his own ideas and purposes.
    [Show full text]
  • Aviation Criminal Laws Applicable in Indonesia 1
    IOSR Journal of Applied Chemistry (IOSR-JAC) e-ISSN: 2278-5736.Volume 9, Issue 2 Ver. I (Feb. 2016), PP 49-61 www.iosrjournals.org Aviation Criminal Laws Applicable In Indonesia 1 Dr Amand Sudiro and Dr K.Martono Abstract: This Article deals with introduction, legal ground of aviation criminal law, aviation criminal law for domestic flight including (a) penal code (KUHP),(b) Act Number 15 of 2003, (c) Act Number 1 of 2009; aviation criminal law for international flight includes (a) Tokyo Convention of 1963 includes the main content of the Tokyo Convention of 1963, jurisdiction, power of the aircraft commander and duties of States, ( b) The Hague Convention of 1970 includes scope of application, jurisdiction, (c) Montreal Convention of 1971, (d) Montreal Protocol of 1988;aviation criminal law related to ASEAN includes (a) aviation security in the AMAAS, (b) counter-terrorism action plan in Indonesia; Aviation criminal cases and others in Indonesia includes (a) hijacking, (b) aviation criminal related to aircraft accidents, (c) aviation criminal related to terrorism, and (d) entering the Indonesian territory without permission. Keywords: aviation criminal, hijacking, terrorism, and Indonesia. I. Introduction Within the period of 30 (thirty) years from 1980 to 2010, hijacking incidents have accounted to 46 (forty six) events which shook the international community. One of the eventful incidents that occurred in Indonesian territory was the hijacking of flight Garuda Indonesia GA 206 on March 28, 1981. This was the first serious Indonesian
    [Show full text]
  • Aviation/Aerospace Education & Research
    Journal of Aviation/Aerospace Education & Research Volume 16 Number 2 JAAER Winter 2007 Article 3 Winter 2007 Aviation Law: Cases and Materials Steve V. Dedmon Follow this and additional works at: https://commons.erau.edu/jaaer Scholarly Commons Citation Dedmon, S. V. (2007). Aviation Law: Cases and Materials. Journal of Aviation/Aerospace Education & Research, 16(2). Retrieved from https://commons.erau.edu/jaaer/vol16/iss2/3 This Book Review is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Journal of Aviation/Aerospace Education & Research by an authorized administrator of Scholarly Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Dedmon: Aviation Law: Cases and Materials Book Review: Aviation Law FORUM Book Review A YLA TION LA W: CASES AND M.4 TERL4LS BY ROBERT M. JARVIS, JAMES T. CROUSE, JAMES R. FOX & GREGORY W. WALDEN. DURHAM, NC: CAROLINA ACADEMIC PRESS, 2006. PP. VIIl947. USD 110.00. ISBN; 159460-030-9. A YLA TION LA W: CASES AND MATER. - TEQCHER'S MANUAL BY ROBERT M. JARVIS, JAMES T. CROUSE, JAMES R. FOX & GREGORY W. WALDEN. DURHAM NC: CAROLINA ACADEMIC PRESS, 2006. PP W90.N.P. S.V. (STEVE) DEDMON Just to- clarify my position from the beginning, this is a great book. However, to avoid the very appearance of impropriety I must disclose Robert M. Jarvis was my faculty advisor as a 1L while attending Nova southeastern University in 1995. I remember our initial meeting over a pizza lunch during which he solicited comments concerning our law school experience up to that point.
    [Show full text]