Land at North Harlow: Gilston Area Concept Brochure 22Nd MAY 2014 CONTENTS

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Land at North Harlow: Gilston Area Concept Brochure 22Nd MAY 2014 CONTENTS LAND AT NORTH HARLOW: GILSTON AREA CONCEPT BROCHURE 22ND MAY 2014 CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION........................................................................................3 2.0 BACKGROUND.........................................................................................4 3.0 PLANNING CONTEXT...............................................................................5 4.0 HOUSING NEED.......................................................................................6 5.0 PRINCIPLES OF DEVELOPMENT ...........................................................7 6.0 SITE ANALYSIS 6.1 MASTER PLANNING.........................................................................9 6.2 TRAnsport & ACCESS.................................................................17 6.3 LANDSCAPE...................................................................................29 7.0 INITIAL DESIGN CONCEPTS.................................................................40 8.0 SOCIAL AND ECONOMIC BENEFITS.....................................................42 9.0 SUMMAry & NEXT STEPS.....................................................................43 1.0 INTRODUCTION This document is submitted as part of the supporting planning case for a residentially led, mixed use development of the Land North of Harlow Town, on behalf of our client City and Provincial Properties (CPP). CPP is one of the UK’s premier developers and one of the two main landowners within the Gilston Area identified for future housing growth. They have assembled a team of leading core advisors at this stage of the project, as listed below. • Savills (planning consultants) • Spacecraft Architects (masterplanners / architects) • Alan Baxter Associates (transportation consultants) • Churchman Landscape Architects (landscape consultants) The aim is to make the very best of the unique opportunity to deliver a high quality and sustainable development as part of the wider masterplan for the Gilston Area, which would contribute towards meeting the District’s existing and future housing needs, within East Hertfordshire District Council (EHDC) emerging District Plan plan period. 3 2.0 BACKGROUND The site is approximately 114 hectares and is located north of Harlow within the Gilston Area of the District of East Hertfordshire. The site is located east and west of Church Lane, north of the A414. The site is currently within the Green Belt and is in use as agricultural land, with some built form to include an existing farmstead (Brickhouse Farm) within the central part of the site. It GILSTON PARK is well contained by natural field boundaries to its north, the A414 to its south and a hedgerow as the site’s western boundary. The surrounding area to the north, east and west consists largely of countryside, primary agricultural use and pockets of woodland. SITE Further to its designation as Green Belt, the site contains modest pockets of land designated as an Area of Archaeological SITE Significance and is adjacent to two Wildlife Sites. Other than the Grade II Listed Brickhouse Farm and associated Barn and Stable, the site does not contain any other heritage A414 assets and it is not within a Flood Risk Zone. TRAINLINE RIVER STORT HARLOW TOWN PINNACLE Fig 1 Site Within Existing Context Form 4 3.0 PLANNING CONTEXT The NPPF sets out the Government’s current and future It states that Green Belt boundaries should only be altered in requirements for significantly boosting the country’s supply of “exceptional circumstances” and “through the preparation or housing, in order to facilitate nationwide economic growth. review of the Local Plan.” If under review, it is recommended that the local authority “not include land which it is unnecessary The National Planning Policy Framework establishes key priorities to keep permanently open,” and “define boundaries clearly, to “boost significantly the supply of housing,” “meet the needs of using physical features that are readily recognisable and likely present and future generations” and “widen the choice of high to be permanent.” quality homes.” It also places significant weight on sustainable economic growth - both in terms of new economic development In considering the value of Green Belt land, the NPPF identifies and new homes. 5 purposes of the Green Belt . These are: The NPPF requires Council’s to allocate land to meet objectively 1. To check unrestricted sprawl of large built-up areas; assessed needs in order to boost the supply of housing. Paragraph 47 states that Local Planning Authorities (LPAs) should use 2. To prevent neighbouring towns from merging into one their evidence base to ensure that housing targets, based on another; objectively assessed needs, for market and affordable housing in the housing market area are set. 3. To assist in safeguarding the countryside from encroachment; The NPPF dictates that LPAs should identify and annually update a supply of specific deliverable sites sufficient to provide five 4. To preserve the setting and special character of historic years worth of housing against their housing requirements with towns; and an additional buffer of 5% (moved forward from later in the plan period) to ensure choice and competition in the market for land. 5. To assist in urban regeneration by encouraging the recycling of derelict and other urban land. The NPPF also states that LPAs must identify a supply of specific, developable sites or broad locations for growth for years 6-10, In order to meet objectively assessed needs EHDC and where possible for years 11-15. acknowledge that they will need to release Green Belt land to accommodate their future housing requirements. Logically, it For market and affordable housing, the NPPF states that LPAs makes sense that land which contributes least to the purposes should illustrate the expected rate of housing delivery through of the Green Belt should be released. a housing trajectory for the plan period and set out a housing implementation strategy for the full range of housing, describing Prior to consideration within the emerging District Plan, the how they will maintain delivery of a five-year supply of housing Gilston Area was an established residential allocation within land to meet their own target. the South East Regional Plan. Paragraph 83 of the NPPF states that LPAs with Green Belts in their administrative area should establish Green Belt boundaries in their Local Plans which set the framework for settlement policy. 5 4.0 HOUSING NEED The current Development Plan for the East Herts District In order to meet the future housing needs of the District and comprises: adjoining Local Authorities, EHDC have identified, at draft Policy GA1, the “Gilston Area” a Broad Location for development in • National Planning Policy Framework (2012) contributing a total of between 5,000 and 10,000 new homes to the year 2031 and beyond, with 3,000 new homes allocated to • Saved Policies from East Herts Local Plan (2007; Saved come forward pre-2031. Importantly, the CPP land is included 2010) within this draft allocation. In principle, EHDC’s recognition of the Gilston Area for accommodating future housing growth • Various Supplementary Planning Documents (SPDs) is strongly supported. However it is considered that there is an opportunity for positively achieving in the region of 5,000 The Council are in the process of preparing a new District Plan, new homes within the plan period to 2031, in order to create which once adopted, will become the key document guiding the planning certainty within EHDC’s emerging District Plan and direction of planning and development within the District up to meet pressing future housing needs within the local area. These 2031. specific planning issues are addressed more comprehensively within Savills Planning Representations Document, which form The latest version of the emerging District Plan is the Preferred part of CPP’s formal representations. Options Consultation Document, which was published for public consultation in February 2014. Within this version, EHDC identify a minimum housing delivery target of 15,000 dwellings for the plan period of 2011 to 2031; however the planning representations that accompany the submission of this brochure question whether this target is sufficient to accommodate objectively assessed needs, the requirements of neighbouring authorities under the duty to cooperate and the historic undersupply of housing within East Herts. Notwithstanding this, even at a minimum housing target of 15,000 units, EHDC acknowledge that consideration must be given to the release of Green Belt land within the District. To assist this, the Council have produced a number of evidence base documents including a Strategic Land Availability Assessment (SLAA) (October 2012, with an update due in Summer 2014), a District-Wide Green Belt Review – Part 1 (September 2013) and EHDC’s Interim Development Strategy (January 2014). EHDC have also published and Interim Sustainability Appraisal Report (January 2014). 6 5.0 PRINCIPLES OF DEVELOPMENT Land at North Harlow, as part of the wider Gilston Area, offers a unique opportunity to deliver a sustainable development capable of capable of providing for a significant proportion of housing needs within the emerging District Plan plan period (and beyond). In light of the housing requirement and the necessity for Green Belt release within the plan period, the Gilston Area is the only location in the district that is capable of sustainably delivering the required levels of future growth. Based on the proposed
Recommended publications
  • The Hundred Parishes HUNSDON
    The Hundred Parishes An introduction to HUNSDON 4 miles NW of Harlow. Ordnance Survey grid square TL4114. Postcode SG12 8NJ. Access: B180, no train station. The village is served by bus routes 351 (Hertford to Bishop‘s Stortford), C3 (Waltham Cross to Hertford or Harlow) and 5 (South End to Harlow Sats. only). County: Hertfordshire. District: East Hertfordshire. Population: 1,080 in 2011. The village of Hunsdon was registered in the Domesday Book of 1086. The village centre is dominated by the 15th-century village hall, originally a house called ’The Harlowes’ which had previously been the village school as far back as at least 1806. The hall faces one of the village’s original 5 greens, mainly now used as a pub car park but also the site of the war memorial. A number of houses in the village date back to the same period as the hall, including ’White Horses’ to the right of the village hall, while many others are of subsequent centuries. Hunsdon’s greatest claim to fame is as the site of Hunsdon House to the east of the church. The house was built in the 15th century by Sir William Oldhall, but by the 16th century the building and its extensive parks were in the hands of the Crown. Henry VIII rebuilt the house expanding it into a palatial estate in the Tudor style, complete with royal apartments and even a moat, making it into a splendid palace. Henry spent much of his leisure time at Hunsdon hunting in the well stocked deerpark. All of the King’s children lived there, Mary until her accession to the throne, Elizabeth and particularly Prince Edward.
    [Show full text]
  • Eco-Hydrological Survey of Hunsdon Mead Sssi – Unit 2, Roydon Mead 2015 - 2017
    ECO-HYDROLOGICAL SURVEY OF HUNSDON MEAD SSSI – UNIT 2, ROYDON MEAD 2015 - 2017 FLOODPLAIN MEADOWS PARTNERSHIP AMBASSADOR PROGRAMME SPRING VIEW OF ROYDON MEAD (2015) Sonja Kaupe Natural England June 2017 Floodplain Meadows Partnership Ambassador Programme – Hunsdon Mead Unit 2 (Roydon Mead) - 2015-2017. 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Roydon Mead is part of Hunsdon Mead SSSI, designated for its floodplain meadow plant communities. It is one of the remaining sites in the area still managed on the ancient Lammas system of hay making followed by winter grazing. Roydon Mead is the smaller of the two units of the SSSI and is a complex of meadows, privately owned, that seasonally flood from the Canons Brook. High nutrients levels and waterlogging have been known issues on the site and may be a threat to the existing plant communities. This 2 year study was lead as part of the Floodplain Meadow Partnership Ambassador programme. Its aim was to study the different aspects influencing the ecology of floodplain meadows, understand a site and make informed management recommendations. The conclusions of this study reinforced the known issues and hopefully underpinned it with useful data. The main grassland community still shows an interesting list of positive MG4 indicator species and indeed some part of the site display a species rich sward. Other parts of the site though suffer from the water logging and the high nutrient levels and this reflects in the plant community with a seasonal shift between an MG4c and MG15b community, both being at the higher end of both the water and fertility spectrum. Management recommendations have been made to address both issues and hopefully help the site to recover towards a species rich floodplain meadow.
    [Show full text]
  • RIVER STORT DRAFT CATCHMENT MANAGEMENT PLAN May 1991
    NRA Thames 252 RIVER STORT DRAFT CATCHMENT MANAGEMENT PLAN FLOOD DEFENCE AND THE ENVIRONMENT May 1991 NRA National Rii'ers Authority Thames Region U lJ \ T lW ltS RIVER STORT DRAFT CATCHMENT MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR FLOOD DEFENCE AND THE ENVIRONMENT MAY 1991 prepared by The National Rivers Authority Thames Region with the assistance of Land Use Consultants Flynn and Kothweii Herts and Middlesex Wildlife Trust Essex Wildlife Trust Lee Donaldson Associates ENVIRONMENT AGENCY 123198 A VISION FOR THE RIVER STORT CATCHMENT The river corridors of ihe Stort Catchment are a valuable natural resource, comprising sensitive ecological habitats, a landscape of considerable diversity and value, and areas which are popular for informal recreation. The Stort Navigation is of particular historical significance and its characteristics make it unique in the Thames Region. The objective of the NRA TR is to conserve and, wherever possible, enhance the value of this resource. This will be achieved through appropriate direct management of the water environment, including the provision of appropriate standards of urban flood protection, and partnership with the riparian local authorities, British Waterways Board and other interested organisations. A central part of this objective is to secure the designation of the corridor of the Lower Stort Valley and the Stort Navigation as a ’Special Heritage Area* in the statutory development plans. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Aim of the Catchment Management Plan Under the 1989 Water Act the National Rivers Authority (NRA) is required to conserve and enhance the water environment. Such an important role requires a multi-disciplinary approach; catchment management planning seeks to provide a multi-disciplinary strategy for each catchment.
    [Show full text]
  • Harlow District Council Local Wildlife Site Review
    HARLOW DISTRICT COUNCIL LOCAL WILDLIFE SITE REVIEW 2010 FINAL March 2011 EECOS Abbotts Hall Farm, Great Wigborough, Colchester, Essex, CO5 7RZ 01621 862986, [email protected] Company Registered No. 2853947 VAT Registered No. 945 7459 77 IMPORTANT NOTES Nomenclature The terms "Site of Importance for Nature Conservation" (SINC), “Wildlife Sites” and “County Wildlife Site” (CoWS) used in previous reports are here replaced by the currently generally accepted term of “Local Wildlife Site” (LoWS). The term should be viewed in a national context, with “Local” referring to county level significance. Rationale It is hoped that this identification of Local Wildlife Sites is not seen as a hindrance to the livelihood of those landowners affected, or an attempt to blindly influence the management of such sites. It is an attempt to describe the wildlife resource we have in the county as a whole, which has been preserved thus far as a result of the management by landowners. The Essex Wildlife Trust and the Local and Unitary Authorities of Essex hope to be able to help landowners retain and enhance this biodiversity for the future. In recent years, the existence of a Local Wildlife Site on a farm has been seen as an advantage when applying for grant-aid from agri-environment schemes, with such grants favouring areas with a proven nature conservation interest. Public Access Identification as a Local Wildlife Site within this report does not confer any right of public access to the site, above and beyond any Public Rights of Way that may exist. The vast majority of the Sites in the county are in private ownership and this should be respected at all times.
    [Show full text]
  • Landscape and Visual Appraisal August 2016
    Gilston Area - Landscape and Visual Appraisal August 2016 Gilston Area Landscape and Visual Appraisal August 2016 i Gilston Area - Landscape and Visual Appraisal August 2016 Contents 1 Introduction 1 1.1 Preamble 1 1.2 Purpose and Scope of Report 1 2 Methodology 2 2.1 General 2 2.2 Study Area 2 2.3 The Main Stages of the Appraisal 3 3 Baseline Conditions 4 3.1 Overview 4 3.2 Landscape Conditions 4 3.3 Visual Conditions 9 4 The Proposed Development 10 4.1 Overview 10 4.2 The Villages 10 4.3 Landscape Proposals 10 5 Potential Landscape and Visual Effects 12 5.1 Overview 12 5.2 Landscape Effects 12 5.3 Visual Effects 13 6 Summary 49 6.1 Overview 49 6.2 Landscape Appraisal 49 6.3 Visual Appraisal 49 ii Gilston Area - Landscape and Visual Appraisal August 2016 1 Introduction 1.1 Preamble 1.1.1 Places for People (PfP) and City & Provincial Properties (CPP) are jointly promoting a strategic development of 10,000 new homes on land to the north of Harlow, referred to as the ‘Gilston Area’ in the draft East Herts District Plan. This strategic development is being promoted in order to assist in meeting the housing and regeneration needs of both East Hertfordshire and Harlow. 1.1.2 The Gilston Area has been identified as a Broad Location for New Development within the Preferred Options version of East Hertfordshire District Council’s District Plan. 1.2 Purpose and Scope of Report 1.2.1 This Landscape and Visual Appraisal (LVA) has been prepared by Capita to support the evidence base for the Gilston Area development.
    [Show full text]
  • Phase 1 Habitat Survey Rosewood Farm Essex
    PHASE 1 HABITAT SURVEY ROSEWOOD FARM ESSEX Prepared Checked Approved Version Date Date Date by by by R1 Jack 11/06/2013 Thomas 14/06/2013 Graeme 14/06/2013 Fenwick McQuillan Skinner PHASE 1 HABITAT SURVEY ROSEWOOD FARM COMMON ROAD BROADLEY COMMON ESSEX EN9 2DF GRID REF: TL 422 071 FOR NIC PEACE Naturally Wild Consultants Limited Office 38 Evans Business Centre Unit 1 Stephenson Court Skippers Lane Ind. Est. Middleborough TS6 6UT Email: [email protected] Page 2 of 27 NP-13-01 11/06/2013 Phase 1 Habitat Survey, Rosewood Farm, Essex Contents Page EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 4 1 INTRODUCTION 5 1.1 Background 5 2 RELEVANT LEGISLATION & POLICY 6 3 PHASE 1 HABITAT SURVEY 6 3.1 Objective of Survey 6 3.2 Survey Area 6 3.3 Habitat Description 7 3.4 Survey Constraints 7 4 METHODOLOGY 8 5 RESULTS 9 5.1 Desktop Study 9 5.1.1 Desktop Study 9 5.1.2 Statutory and Non-statutory Search 10 5.2 Site Visit 12 5.2.1 On Site Ecological Features 12 5.2.2 Off Site Ecological Features 13 5.2.3 Protected Species 13 5.2.4 Phase 1 Habitat Map 15 6 EVALUATION & RECOMMENDATIONS 17 7 SITE IMAGES 18 8 REFERENCES 25 9 APPENDIX 25 8.1 Additional Information for the Legislation 25 of Other Protected Species Page 3 of 27 NP-13-01 11/06/2013 Phase 1 Habitat Survey, Rosewood Farm, Essex EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Naturally Wild were commissioned to undertake a Phase 1 Habitat Survey at Rosewood Farm, and associated land to the south, which is located directly off Common Road, Broadley Common, Essex.
    [Show full text]
  • Trustees' Report and Financial Statements Year Ended 31 March
    HERTFORDSHIRE AND MIDDLESEX WILDLIFE TRUST LIMITED (A company limited by guarantee) Company Registration Number 816710 Charity Number 239863 TRUSTEES’ REPORT AND FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE YEAR ENDED 31 MARCH 2018 CONTENTS Legal and administrative information 2 Trustees’ Report consisting of the following: Introduction 3 Structure, governance and management 4 Trust vision, objectives and strategic plans 8 Review of year ended 31 March 2018 9 Headline actions for year ending 31 March 2019 18 Financial review and results for the year 20 Statement of Trustees’ responsibilities 25 Independent auditor’s report 26 Statement of financial activities 29 Balance sheet 30 Statement of cash flows 31 Notes forming part of the financial statements for the year ended 31 March 2018 32 HERTFORDSHIRE AND MIDDLESEX WILDLIFE TRUST LIMITED LEGAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE INFORMATION Honorary President Sir Simon Bowes-Lyon, KCVO Honorary Vice President Robert Wilson Council of Management (Trustees) Olivia Bertham Andy Brown Dr Veronica Edmonds-Brown (Vice Chairman) Dr Agneta Burton Keith Cotton Peter Delaloye Clive Hinds (Treasurer) Paul Knutson Sarah Kohl Michael Master (Chairman) Andrew Woods Chairman, Finance & Resources Clive Hinds Committee Chairman, Conservation, Community Dr Veronica Edmonds-Brown & Education Committee Chairman, Health & Safety Committee Sarah Kohl Chief Executive Lesley Davies Senior Management Team Vicky Barrett, Finance Manager (01/17 to 01/18) Sally Clark, Finance Manager (from 01/18) Dr Tom Day, Head of Living Landscapes Emma Norrington,
    [Show full text]
  • Landscape Character Assessment ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
    Front and Back Cover:Front and Back Cover 1/10/07 13:47 Page 1 Supplementary Planning Document Development Plans Team September 2007 Supplementary Planning Document (SPD) to the East Herts Local Plan Second Review 2007 September 2007 CONTENTS PAGE Pages 1.0 Introduction 1 2.0 Purpose & Status 2-3 3.0 Background & Context 4-7 4.0 The Landscape of Hertfordshire 8-15 5.0 Methodology 16-23 6.0 Landscape Character Areas 24-26 Appendix A Bibliography 278 Appendix B Glossary 280 Appendix C Field Survey Sheet 282 Appendix D Landscape Character Area Map 284 (Separate A1 sheet) East Herts District Landscape Character Assessment ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The Landscape Partnership produced this technical study on behalf of East Herts District Council in partnership with Hertfordshire County Council (HCC). The Landscape Partnership Ltd is a prac- tice registered with the Landscape Institute and the Royal Town Planning Institute and is a member of the Institute of Environmental Management and Assessment. This document could not have been achieved without the com- bined efforts of the staff of Hertfordshire County Council, East Hertfordshire District Council, North Hertfordshire District Council, their consultants Babtie, The Living Landscapes Project and The Landscape Partnership Limited. The project was financially spon- sored by the following: Countryside Management Services (work- ing in Hertfordshire and Barnet), East Hertfordshire District Council, Hertfordshire Biological Records Centre (HBRC), and Hertfordshire County Council. The Landscape Partnership would like to thank all those who par- ticipated and in particular: * Members of HCC staff, especially Simon Odell, Head of Landscape, who supplied unfailing encouragement, quotations and many photographs; Frances Hassett, HBRC, who enabled Trevor James, (formerly HBRC) to make further contributions from his intimate knowledge of the ecology of the county; Alison Tinniswood for her assistance on the county's history and Lynn Dyson-Bruce, on secondment from English Heritage, for her valiant work on the historic landscape data.
    [Show full text]
  • Local Government and Society in Early Modern England: Hertfordshire and Essex, C
    Louisiana State University LSU Digital Commons LSU Doctoral Dissertations Graduate School 2003 Local government and society in early modern England: Hertfordshire and Essex, C. 1590-- 1630 Jeffery R. Hankins Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_dissertations Part of the History Commons Recommended Citation Hankins, Jeffery R., "Local government and society in early modern England: Hertfordshire and Essex, C. 1590-- 1630" (2003). LSU Doctoral Dissertations. 336. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_dissertations/336 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at LSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in LSU Doctoral Dissertations by an authorized graduate school editor of LSU Digital Commons. For more information, please [email protected]. LOCAL GOVERNMENT AND SOCIETY IN EARLY MODERN ENGLAND: HERTFORDSHIRE AND ESSEX, C. 1590--1630 A Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy In The Department of History By Jeffery R. Hankins B.A., University of Texas at Austin, 1975 M.A., Southwest Texas State University, 1998 December 2003 Acknowledgments I would like to thank my advisor Dr. Victor Stater for his guidance in this dissertation. Dr. Stater has always helped me to keep the larger picture in mind, which is invaluable when conducting a local government study such as this. He has also impressed upon me the importance of bringing out individual stories in history; this has contributed greatly to the interest and relevance of this study.
    [Show full text]
  • Essex Bap Grassland Study
    ESSEX BAP GRASSLAND STUDY Final Report for Essex Biodiversity Project and Essex County Council September 2011 Client: Essex Biodiversity Project and Essex County Council Title: Essex BAP Grassland Study Project No: 403 Date of Issue: 22 September 2011 (V3) Status: Final Signed on behalf of Applied Ecology Ltd: Dr Duncan Painter Director CONTACT DETAILS: APPLIED ECOLOGY LTD St. John's Innovation Centre Cowley Road Cambridge CB4 0WS Tel: 01223 422 116 Fax: 01223 420 844 Mobile: 07725 811 777 Email: [email protected] Essex BAP Grassland Study Final Report Contents 1 Introduction ............................................................................................................................1 1.1 Background..............................................................................................................................1 2 Grassland Inventory..............................................................................................................2 2.1 Methods....................................................................................................................................2 2.2 Results.......................................................................................................................................4 2.3 Conclusions..............................................................................................................................8 3 Grassland Types.....................................................................................................................9
    [Show full text]
  • The Epping Forest District Local Plan
    The Epping Forest District Local Plan Interim SA Report July 2012 UNITED KINGDOM & IRELAND Prepared for: SA of the Epping Forest District Local Plan REVISION SCHEDULE Rev Date Details Prepared by Reviewed by Approved by 1 July 2012 Interim SA Report for publication Chris Eves Steve Smith Steve Smith alongside the „Community Graduate Associate Associate Choices‟ consultation document Consultant and subsequent consideration by the Council. Mark Fessey Senior Consultant URS Infrastructure and Environment UK Limited 6-8 Greencoat Place London, SW1P 1PL Telephone: +44(0)20 7798 5000 Fax: +44(0)20 7798 5001 SA of the Epping Forest District Local Plan Limitations URS Infrastructure & Environment UK Limited (“URS”) has prepared this Report for the sole use of Epping Forest District Council (“Client”) in accordance with the Agreement under which our services were performed. No other warranty, expressed or implied, is made as to the professional advice included in this Report or any other services provided by URS. The conclusions and recommendations contained in this Report are based upon information provided by others and upon the assumption that all relevant information has been provided by those parties from whom it has been requested and that such information is accurate. Information obtained by URS has not been independently verified by URS, unless otherwise stated in the Report. The methodology adopted and the sources of information used by URS in providing its services are outlined in this Report. The work described in this Report was undertaken between May 2012 and July 2012 and is based on the conditions encountered and the information available during the said period of time.
    [Show full text]
  • ASSESSMENT of FIVE YEAR HOUSING LAND SUPPLY EPPING FOREST DISTRICT COUNCIL April 2016 Green Planning Studio
    Unit D, Lunesdale, Upton Magna Business Park, Upton Magna, Shrewsbury, SY4 4TT ASSESSMENT OF FIVE YEAR HOUSING LAND SUPPLY EPPING FOREST DISTRICT COUNCIL April 2016 Green Planning Studio Ltd Unit D Lunesdale Upton Magna Business Park Shrewsbury SY4 4TT Tel: 01743 709364 Fax: 01743 709385 Email: [email protected] GPS Ref: 15_685_SPEA1 Client: Richard Spearman 1 CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION_______________________________________________________3 2. EPPING FOREST DISTRICT COUNCIL 5 YEAR HOUSING LAND SUPPLY POSITION___4 3. EPPING FOREST DISTRICT COUNCIL HOUSING REQUIREMENT_________________5 4. HOUSING SUPPLY_____________________________________________________8 5. CONCLUSIONS_______________________________________________________10 APPENDICES APPENDIX A – EPPING FOREST DISTRICT COUNCIL’S ‘5 YEAR ASSESSMENT OF LAND SUPPLY’ - APRIL 2016 APPENDIX B – EPPING FOREST DISTRICT COUNCIL’S AUTHORITY MONITORING REPORT 2014/15 - APRIL 2016 APPENDIX C – OPINION RESEARCH SERVICES’ WEST ESSEX AND EAST HERTFORDSHIRE STRATEGIC HOUSING MARKET ASSESSMENT - SEPTEMBER 2015 2 1. INTRODUCTION 1.1. Green Planning Studio Ltd has been instructed by Mr Richard Spearman to undertake an assessment of Epping Forest District Council’s current five year housing land supply position. This assessment is undertaken in line with advice and guidance set out in both the National Planning Policy Framework and the Planning Practice Guidance. 1.2. The assessment will address the following in turn: - Epping Forest District Council 5 year housing land supply position - Epping Forest
    [Show full text]